Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $75/year. Or $400 for a lifetime membership. But I've read one PU member complaining he paid for a lifetime membership to Hegre, then it somehow got cancelled. I've read other people saying their lifetime memberships to other sites have been cancelled (to Playboy+, for example.) It even happened to me, at Glam Deluxe, while it was still alive.
-Some of the most gorgeous women in the world have appeared nude at Hegre. Except the same can be said for many of the best softcore sites on the internet: Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc. etc.
-The quality of the photographs is first-rate.
-The technical features for viewing the photographs is outstanding. One of the best sites for viewing photo sets online I've ever seen. Can flick through the photos, or examine them in detail.
-Photo sets are available in original, large size, medium size, and small size definition.
Cons:
-The photos are basically boring and sterile for me. Yes, there are lots of beautiful models, but there is a lack of eroticism to the photos. For one thing, the photographer seems to have created his photo sets by setting the camera to automatic, and it goes click-click-click-click while the model barely moves or changes her position. For another, he often cuts off part of the model's face.
I think the photographer is treating the model as a statue or a piece of meat, not as a real human person you want to relate to.
-Years ago, Hegre was softcore photosets. But for many years now, the site has featured mid-core and hard photos and videos.
-Maybe it's just me, but the Hegre hardcore photos and videos are just not arousing or exciting. The site seems sterile to me, in spite of the gorgeous models. If you have the same model at Hegre and at Metart or MPL studios or Femjoy (which are basically softcore), I much prefer the Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy photo sets, because the model seems
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
much more human.
Note: I'm now into my 70s, so I'm not as sensitive to nudity or semi-nudity as I was when I was younger. But I fail to appreciate most of the content at Hegre, while I can still find images from Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy that are enjoyable or arousing.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
The photo sets are technically first-rate photography, but in spite of the lovely models, I find the photos sterile.
I appreciate the technical features of the Hegre site: how easy it is to flick through a photo set, to enlarge any photo to examine it, the quality of the photos. Except the photos are sterile and boring. Boring because the images are a montage of a camera set to automatically capture a composite of the model who is barely moving, so each photo is almost an exact duplicate of the photo before it. Seems like a quick way to create a boring photo set, to me. With no thought to make it meaningful.
Then why am I a member for over a year?
Because I originally signed up for a year's membership, and then forgot to cancel.
Hegre has some truly lovely models. But I just can't appreciate the photography. Or the videos, which are now hardcore. I have nothing against hardcore, but I don't enjoy the hardcore at Hegre.
What I've written is my own personal opinion.
Most other PU member reviews that I've seen have rated Hegre in the 90s, and think it's one of the better high quality sites on the internet.
So, I suggest joining the site for a month, to see what the site has to offer, if it appeals to your tastes.
You might find it is a quality site that is definitely worth joining for a year or more.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They now have secure login and secure member pages. Until recently, the login, and the member pages, were sometimes secure, sometimes non-secure.
-Site updates twice a month with a new video.
-The models are young Eastern European girls, slender, white girls from around Russia.
If you're into Russian teen porn (Teen Mega World, Diesel network, Team Skeet, etc.) you will have seen many of these models at other sites.
-Many of the videos at the site are exclusive to the site. But there is some sharing with the DirtyFlix network, because both networks are managed by the same people.
Cons:
-Credit cards are no longer accepted for Young Libertines or the parent network, 18Videoz. You have to pay with cryptocurrency.
-During the year, at holidays, you can often find a price of $59.95/year, if you join through the 18Videoz.com site.
The 18 Videoz site/network has around 18 different sites, including the Young Libertines site.
So wait for a holiday special where you can join at $59.95 for 1 year through the 18Videoz site.
Note: There used to be holiday specials at $59.95/year, but maybe no longer, since they've stopped accepting credit card payment.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-It doesn't matter which definition of a video you download: Each definition of that video has the same file name.
So you have to manually change the file name if you want to download more than one definition of the file.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: young girls who sell their bodies to make extra cash.
Years ago, the site theme was young girls who sell their bodies to make extra cash.
But in the last few years, they dropped that theme, and have gone to straight porno, with no plot: young girls fucking.
Or if there is a plot, it's very simple: a girl meets a guy, and maybe they talk for a minute or two, before they start to fuck.
Even though there wasn't a lot of plot in the early videos, it did add a bit of meaning to the sex. A girl needs cash, she hooks up with some guy, and they have sex for money. So there's some meaning in how the girl and guy interact.
But the last few years, the plot is more like: Wham, bam, sex! Little to no build-up to the sex. Maybe Russians don't need a reason for sex, except being horny all the time. I wish I could meet some women like that where I live.
The models are young women, late teens or early twenties. Slender. White. Attractive to very attractive.
The videos are professionally shot. Good lighting, good sound control, nice sets.
So if you're into teen porn, this site should offer you plenty of content that you might enjoy.
I only wish they brought back the young libertine theme: porn is fantasy, I realize that, but a little bit of story adds meaning to two or more bodies slapping against each other. Even when the girls are attractive to very attractive, I want some meaning to the sex.
Giving the site a score of 85.
I don't like that the site (and network) no longer accepts credit card payment.
I haven't used cryptocurrency, and don't want to bother using it.
Would also like a bit of plot to the videos.
But the girls are attractive teens, and if you're into Russian teen porn, which is found at many teen porn sites, you've probably seen many of the girls at this site and network.
Note: both 18 Videoz and Dirty Flix networks have stopped accepting credit card payments. They only accept cryptocurrency.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price, if you snag a holiday discount. I joined for $5.00 for the first month. This is streaming only. Downloads would be a higher priced membership. My membership renews at $19.95/month (streaming only). I plan to cancel before the month ends.
-You get access to 5 sites in the network. AllBlackX, DarkX, EroticaX, HardX, LesbianX.
-Navigation within the network sites is easy. The sites are clearly and logically laid out. Switching between the sites is easy. You don't need to log out from a site to switch.
-You can watch the full video, or a trailer, to see what the movie is about.
-The model listing is mainly attractive white women. Not the most gorgeous or glamourous, but attractive.
-The videos are plot driven. The plots are simple, but they add a slight element of meaning to the sex. And give the models a chance to show off their acting talents.
-The videos are professionally shot: good technicals (clear, crisp images, good lighting, good focus, good sound control,
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
nice sets).
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-I believe there is a 300 GB daily download limit, which seems generous.
-The last few years, they have a 4K definition streaming/download option. But all their videos have a low, medium, high and full high definition options, as well, for streaming and downloads.
-Customer service is 24/7, for live chat, phone, and email.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are mainly minor. The small network gives you access to about 1,700+ glamcore videos for a low introductory price.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The offer I signed up for stated that for a single payment of $5.00 I would get 30 days streaming access to the network. But on the confirming email, it stated that the membership renews at the end of the 30 days at $19.95/month, for streaming only. I plan to cancel before the first month ends, but it would have been nice for the membership to end automatically, without having to cancel. Am I being too nit picky?
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-You get 2 confirming emails on signup. They could combine the 2 emails into one email, for less clutter.
-The network is owned and operated by Gamma Billing Inc, which owns and operates Adult Time. Adult Time uses FameSupport, which is excellent customer support. XEmpire uses a separate customer support named openlife. Why they use a different customer support from Fame Support I don't know. Or maybe openlife is Fame Support with a different name. Why have 2 different support teams when the owner/operator is the same for both networks?
-Your account is available for life. Meaning, you can log in to the site, even if you are not an active paying member. The benefit is that you can simply reactivate your account instead of opening a new one. Other than that, I'm not sure what the benefit is, of a lifetime membership. If your membership is not currently active, I doubt that you can stream or download any videos at the network. It seems like a trivial gimmick.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
For $5 for the first month, if you join in a holiday discount special, you can stream over 1,700 glamcore videos of good quality. Which is a cheap way of finding out if you want to join with a membership that includes downloading privileges.
The network videos are good quality, so it seems like a bargain price to me. Except I've currently enrolled in too many porn sites to really appreciate all this good to excellent porn I'm already paying for. That's a problem that probably applies to many porn users members.
I really need to cut down on my porn memberships, and focus on the porn sites that are really rewarding.
The Pure Taboo channel at Adult Time is an excellent story-driven hardcore porn of twisted desires, one of the best twisted desire sites I've ever seen. Metart is my favorite softcore glamcore photo site on the internet.
The Wow porn network has lovely teen porn models in crystal clear videos and photosets.
I've got lots of other site memberships that are probably wasted money because I don't have the time to visit them very often.
This includes Hegre, and a bunch of lesser quality sites/networks that would be a worthwhile join, but I don't have the time to visit them very often, so I'm just wasting money on sites that I don't visit very often.
I have nothing against the XEmpire network. For $5 (streaming only), it's an OK join. But the videos don't pop off the page to make me jump with joy.
I find more erotic, more arousing videos when I browse my Xvideos.Red membership.
So I'm giving the XEmpire network a score of 85. It's a good network, but nothing special. The internet has a massive amount of porn available, from low quality to medium quality to high quality. XEmpire has good quality glamcore porn, but it's not outstanding. The models are OK to attractive, the navigation is easy, but there are better sites out there for your porn dollars.
Except $5 for one month is the price of 2 cups of coffee at a restaurant. (Or one and a half cup at some restaurants).
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This is not a pro, but an important fact that should be noted:
If you join the site (She Is Nerdy) directly, the price is $29.95/month, or $119.95/year.
Joining through the Dirty Flix site (with a PU discount), the price is $15/month or $60/year, during holiday specials.
I joined for $60/year (recurring) during a holiday special. These discounts are given many times throughout the year.
Whether you join She Is Nerdy or Dirty Flix, you have access to the same sites. There are no sites in the network requiring a premium fee.
-The site (and network) is teen oriented. There is a ton of cute young models (mainly from Russia and surrounding areas) at the network.
-You get around 14 sites with a membership to the site or network.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads, as far as I can tell.
-Site updates with 3 or 4 new videos per month.
-Videos are presented in low, medium and high definition. For the last few years they've offered a 4K definition.
Cons:
-There appears to be both an open and a secure login page for the site/network.
If you open a non-secure login page, put a https in front of the address in the address section of your browser, and that should get you a secure page.
Secure pages are less prone to hacking, and also keep your usage details more private.
For example: http://members.dirtyflix.com/en/ is not secure. https://members.dirtyflix.com/en/ is secure.
-Not much effort is put into making the models attractive or glamourous with either make-up or clothing. But these are young (mainly late teen or early 20s) models who are naturally attractive.
-There is very little diversity in the models. Not a con for me, since these are white, slender teens, with attractive faces and bodies.
-In addition to the cheap clothes the models wear, the sets are also cheap. Cheap locations, cheap furniture. The saving grace is the models are attractive, and you can ignore the threadbare plots.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Ads on every page, standard for porn sites.
-The photosets are screencaps, so the quality is poor or just OK. Not worth collecting, even when the models are cute.
Looking at the network stats, you see that the network has a large amount of content.
The site stats include 177 videos plus matching photosets.
-The network has around 14 sites, so you get some diversity in the theme.
There is very little plot to the videos. You get a guy and a girl, and they suck and fuck. Little foreplay, it must be the water in Russia that makes these guys and gals so horny. (Joke, but it accurately describes the recurring plot, which is, "Hi, lets fuck already).
The site theme is "She is nerdy." They often establish this by having the model wear glasses. Or by putting her in a library or book store at the start of the video, to show she is intelligent or nerdy. What used to be called a bookworm, when I was growing up (in the Dark Ages).
But even nerdy girls are hot to trot, at least the ones shown at this site.
There are many fine teen networks on the internet.
If you find a holiday special, where you can join for $60 for a year, this might be a worthwhile join. The content is mainly exclusive. Although most models are featured at many different teen sites, the videos themselves are basically exclusive to the site.
The network gives you a chance to see some of your favorite Russian porn stars starting out as teens.
Could the site (and network) be improved? Obviously.
The technical features of the videos are good.
The cheap sets, cheap clothes, lack of a plot which might make the sex more memorable, degrade the viewing experience.
But if you know beforehand what to expect, $60 for a year's worth of porn is not bad.
There are many sites/networks I would join before joining this one, but the site/network is not a ripoff.
You get hundreds of cute East European teens, which is the main draw.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network. A teen oriented site. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network.
-Many of the models at the site and network are cute teens. I know I keep writing that there are lots of cute teens at many of these porn sites, but visit these sites, and see what you think: Michelle Can, Vika Lita, Dolce Vita, etc., these girls are cute and sexy.
Cons:
-If your login is not secure (no https in the address bar), just add the "s" character to the "http" in the address bar, for a secure login.
-Then, if your member pages are not secure, do the same: add the "s" character to the "http" in the address bar, for secure pages. Otherwise, your ISP will have a record of the pages you visit. Police can use your internet browsing records against you in court. https://members.dirtyflix.com/en/
-Archive site. Last video was added Jul 3, 2019. Before that, 1 or 2 videos were added per year. So the site never got much attention.
-The biller I used was Verotel. Not as easy as CCBill. You have to use your credit card # and expiration date of the card to communicate with Verotel, instead of your login details or other data.
Bottom Line:
This is an archive site. Stopped updating in 2019.
Site has 63 videos, with matching photosets.
The latest videos have a 4K option.
But even the earliest videos have a desktop and 1080p versions.
Along with a matching photoset for each video.
The photosets run around 80 to 100 photos per set.
-Young Courtesans is probably the best known site in the network. That is a fine site that has a simple plot that is easily filmed: a young girl needs money, so she has sex with a guy. The premise is simple but believable. Many of the models at the site are attractive, and the videos are professionally filmed: Excellent lighting, good colors, good sound control, good focus on the models.
I'm including Young Courtesans because it's my favorite site in the network. But recently they seem to have ignored the basic theme and are just adding any sex encounter for a young teen model, instead of the premise of sex for cash. Not a major defect, but the current theme seems to be a young girl having sex, instead of a young girl trading sex for money. When the Young Courtesan site first started out, they made it clear in the video the girl was trading sex for money, and it added a bit of meaning to the video.
The difference seems slight, but if you watch the older videos at Young Courtesans, and the newer ones, the newer videos lack impact or meaning beyond a horny girl having sex with a guy. With a courtesan, you expect a bit of eroticism or flavor beyond basic sex.
Although the site theme of revenge porn seems like it would be difficult to film, the site videos do a surprisingly good job with the premise. The plot is basically simple: the girl finds her boyfriend/husband is cheating on her and then she fucks some other guy and forces her partner to watch. It's not stupid comedy, but a nice hardcore sex video. The attractive models are a bonus. If they used the same plot at Pure Taboo (a site in Adult Time), the production values would be higher, the film more glossy, but this site gives you a cheaper but watchable version of revenge porn.
"Fucking in front of cuffed bf" with Vika Lita is surprisingly effective.
For one, Vika Lita (aka Belinda, Callie, Lizzy, Melissandra, Thalia D, Vialika) is a very attractive girl.
And she puts on a fine show fucking some guy in front of her tied-up boyfriend.
Actually, watching these videos, they put more thought into the videos than is first apparent.
In one video, you think the wife finds out her husband is cheating, and she has revenge sex with a friend. But at the end of the video, it turns out the wife and the husband were role playing, and he enjoys watching his wife get fucked by other men. Wich ads an unexpected twist to the plot.
I'm giving the site a score of 85.
It's an archive site, no longer updating.
An even though I think they do an okay job with the site theme of revenge porn, I personally think Young Courtesans is a better site because the idea of a young courtesan is more enjoyable than watching revenge porn.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. A fine network, with a discounted membership price of $60/year offered during holiday specials. The listed membership price is $120/year, but the normal PU discounted price is $95/year.
-All sites in the network are available with a regular membership. No sites require a premium upgrade.
-Unlimited streaming.
-There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, which is generous.
-Easy login, if you have cookies enabled.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Videos are offered in 480p for the very earliest videos. Then they started offering 720p and 1080p definition. Most videos were offered in 2 or more bit rates.
-There is a photoset associated with almost all videos. The photos are good quality, and many of the models are suprisingly attractive. So I can see why someone might collect the best of these photosets.
Cons:
-The biggest con is that the site stopped updating in 2017. It's an archive site.
-Two pre-checked cross-sales on the join pages. But a cross-sale is standard for any porn site join page.
-Ads on every member page. Again, standard for almost all porn sites.
-PU lists the site as "Shane Diesel's Bangin Babes". But the New Sensations network, and the site itself, call the site "shanedieselxxx".
Bottom Line:
Shane DieselXXX features a large black man (Shane Diesel) banging white women.
Interracial sex is a popular niche in porn.
Shane Diesel is featured as the stunt cock in all the videos.
There are 317 videos at the site.
This is an archive site, stopped updating in 2017.
The videos run around 28 to 40 minutes.
You get a photoset of the video with around 100 photos per set.
The individual photo in a set is 683x1024 pixels.
I assume the individual photo is an actual photo, and not a screen cap: the photos are well lit, OK to good colors, nicely foucused and centered. It's not a glamour photoset, just a record of individual women getting fucked by Shane Diesel. I have no interest in collecting these photosets. But if you're a fan of Shane Diesel, you might want to collect them.
The basic plot of most videos is Shane Diesel satisfying the basic urge of white women who want to fuck with a massive black cock. Shane Diesel is not a gangster, he knows he's the black man put on earth to let white women suck his dick, then ram that massive dick up their ass and pussy and drive them wild.
Shane Diesel comes across as the self-confident stud we've all wanted to be.
Shane Diesel is not as famous as Rocco Siffredi and Peter North, but his site does a fine job showcasing his talent.
Shane Diesel comes across as a smart guy who built a career and a business in porn.
You can actually purchase, on the internet, a 10 inch "replica of adult star Shane Diesel's cock and balls. Same feel! Same look! This huge ebony dildo is ready for you. Look and feels like Shane Diesel's cock. Firm, yet flexible design. Waterproof, non-vibrating dildo. Suction cup base for hands-free fun. Works with all lubes. Includes autographed photo of Shane Diesel. 100% phthalate free, safe for your body. Weighs 32.70 ounces. Shane Diesel Dildo from New Sensation Novelties NS Sex Toys. Made is the USA."
I don't have any experience with dildos, but 32.70 ounces sounds like a lot of dildo.
Watching a Shane Diesel video gives you a very different feeling from watching a Blacked.com or Blacked Raw video. Blacked.com and Blacked Raw are glamour style interracial porn, where one or more black men have sex with white women. The videos at those two sites are extremely high quality, in terms of the female talent, lighting, professional camera-work, settings, etc. The videos and photosets are of the highest glamcore quality you can find.
Shane Diesel is not glamour, it's more like reality porn, where you get a Okay-looking black man fucking white women. Some of the videos have a cuckold element as well, where you get a wimpy white guy fawning over an attractive white woman, shane diesel shows up and gives the woman a few kisses, he whips out his cock, the woman is so turned on she starts sucking it, and the white guy runs off in tears. Or the woman says she has a boyfriend who doesn't really satisfy her, and Shane smirks and says he's the black bull who will do the job on her.
You know you're not watching Shakespeare with these videos, but they are good quality porn:
Nice sets, the models are mainly attractive white women in their 20s or 30s, and Shane Diesel is excellent as a stunt cock.
I really appreciate the plots are not stupid or trying to be funny.
I'm giving the site a score of 85. If the site started updating again, the score would be higher. The videos at ShaneDiesel don't have the glossy feel of Blacked.com videos, but they are definitely watchable.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Devils Film used to be part of a large network of porn sites. But for the last few years, it was merged into Adult Time, an even bigger network of porn sites. Adult Time has over 55,000 hardcore videos, probably over 50,000 photosets based on those videos.
So you get full access to the Adult Time network with a Devils Film membership, and vice versa.
-Devils Film is for hardcore porn aficionados. You will find anal, threesomes, gangbang, and with other sites that are/were part of the Devils Film network, you can explore lots of other sex niches (trans, faux incest, inter-racial, etc.).
-What's amazing is that the site is still updating. You currently have 6630 videos that are part of the Devils Film site/channel. And more are coming. You could easily spend months watching just the videos at this one channel alone, not counting the 55,000+ other hardcore videos at Adult Time. That is an embarrassment of riches.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-As part of the Adult Time network, the site layout gives you the premium features of most porn sites: multiple definitions for streaming. If your membership inludes downloads, you get multiple definitions for downloads.
-You can watch the full video, or a trailer for the video.
-Streaming and downloads definition for most videos are 160p through 1080p.
-There is a nice, short text summary of the video. Plus plenty of tags that describe the action.
CONS(START OF):
-The site is pure hardcore. Sometimes you want a break from hardcore and want some softcore. Or something slightly more artistic.
-Most PU members want download privileges. Download privileges are normally not included with a monthly membership. Exotics4me writes that if you contact customer service, they might offer you downloading privileges with a monthly sub, and with a discounted rate.
-Because the site and network has such a huge amount of content, navigation can be difficult.
Bottom Line:
CONS-CONTINUED:
-Devils Film never concentrated on finding attractive models. If all you want in a sex video is bodies slapping together, without requiring the models to be good looking, the site gives you plenty of content in many different niches. However, I like the models to be cute or pretty, which limits the videos I enjoy at the site.
-4K videos are in the minority.
BOTTOM LINE-START OF:
-Maybe it's just me, but I find watching these videos to be a low-rent experience. Even when the videos are professionally shot with good to excellent technical qualities: nice sets, good focus, good lighting, good sound control, etc., watching these videos makes me feel I'm watching a crude porn video: unattractive stunt cocks, unattractive models, un-appealing sex, why-the-fuck-am-I wasting-my-time watching shit porn. It's not shit porn, it just seems like shit porn to me. This stuff is garbage, that I don't want to watch. Give me something prettier. Or more interesting. Or whatever. But not this shit.
I can find plenty to watch at Rocco Siffredi. Or Teen Mega World. Or the Wow sites. Or Let's Doe It or other networks. But most of the content at Devils Film is, for me, junk.
It's psychology. Even when I find a video that I should enjoy, because the models are cute, the plot is OK to good, I don't enjoy it, because I'm turned off by the junk videos I've just looked at prior to finding the good video.
For example:
"Seducing My Straight White Best Friend #02", with Coco Lovelock & Michelle Anderson, posted 2022-02-13.
Coco Lovelock is a cute white girl around 22 years old.
Michelle Anderson is a cute black girl around 20 years old.
They are playing students in an empty classroom, who have sex with each other.
Nice lesbian scene, that could be placed in many lesbian sites.
Do I enjoy watching it?
No.
Why?
I'm so turned off by the shit I've already seen at Devils Film, I can't enjoy watching this video, which should be enjoyable, but I can't enjoy it.
That's me. If I have to watch or slog through too many videos that I don't enjoy, I won't find pleasure even when I come across a video that I should normally like.
So I'm giving Devils Film a score of 85.
It's part of Adult Time, which normally would give a site a score in the 90s, because of access to the Adult Time network.
But I really dislike most of the content at Devils Film.
It's not to my taste.
Though some PU members might enjoy the content, and think the site is a fine addition to the Adult Time network.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the better sites in the Nubiles Porn network.
The idea is simple yet effective: easily filmed, without a lot of acting needed by the models, which is a good thing, since most models have limited acting ability. You are watching a model who is trying to enter porn. The casting director is another young model, who has some experience in porn, and she talks/directs the newbie through the shoot.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled.
-Most of the models are cute. Most porn sites focusing on teen models have a catalog of attractive young teens, so this site is just one more. But I do enjoy looking at fine young teens.
-Joining any site in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-The major con is the site stopped updating in 2015. So you only get 67 videos at the site.
-Do not join Nubiles-Casting.com directly.
The PU link gives you a discounted price of:
$14.98/month
$99.95/year
Or you can wait for a holiday special, when the prices might be even lower.
(Joining Nubiles-Casting.com or Nubiles Porn.com directly without using the PU link gives you much higher prices:
$29.32/month
$199.00/year
-A lot of ads for other porn sites. The first page you see when logging in is a full page of ads for other porn sites. Then, when you get to the member pages, you have ads for other porn sites on every member page.
Ads are now standard for porn sites. But since you already paid for your membership, you wish they didn't push the ads so much.
Most porn sites are having financial problems, starting with the financial meltdown in 2008, and now the covid epidemic has lasted for years. And the competition from tube sites and piracy are also major problems.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
So I guess porn sites are scrambling for every penny they can get, and we, as consumers, have to live with it.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Videos are offered in 270p through 1080p. No 4K option offered.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The main con is that the site stopped updating in 2015.
I think the network owners aren't thinking straight, or perhaps they don't care about the quality of the network. Or maybe they enjoy the stupid plots and stupid dialog featured at many of their sites: maybe they even think the stupid plots and poor acting are cute. Maybe they don't care, as long as they have content that will draw in subscribers. Whatever.
The Nubiles Casting site is one of the better sites in the network, because the acting is not cringe-worthy, and the plot makes sense.
Simple plot:
A girl who is new to porn (and most of these models actually are fairly new to porn at the time of filming) is trying out for a porn video. Another model, who has some porn experience, is the casting director, who talks the newbie into removing her clothes. Then the female casting director might make a move on the newbie, for some lesbian sex. Or she might bring the stunt cock into the room, and the stunt cock and the newbie have sex. With the casting director possibly joining in.
There can be slight variations on this simple theme, with two or more female models in the video (in addition to the female casting director).
Sounds simple, but it's easily filmed, without a lot of stupid dialogue or unconvincing acting needed, which makes watching these videos so much easier.
I shouldn't complain so much about stupid plots and stupid dialogue, after years of watching these videos. But it takes away, or destroys, any pleasure in watching many of these videos.
What makes these videos enjoyable?
The models are uniformly attractive. These are girls who are at or near the start of their porn career. Very little tattoos, not a lot of heavy makeup. These girls are the girl-next-door type, not porn stars. Slender bodies, almost no boob jobs.
Simple plots, minimal dialogue needed. Simple sets: a bedroom, a couch, simple, not expensive, but not overly cheap. Costumes are simple street clothes: many of the models wear cut-off shorts to showcase their legs and ass.
The vibe is: you are there, watching a casting call. Of an attractive young girl. Who gets naked, and has sex, with a stunt cock, maybe with the female casting director, maybe with another model who joins in.
This is such a welcome change from the stupid plots, stupid dialogue, lousy acting from the other sites in the network.
Also, it amazes me, how, year after year, all these cute young girls go into porn.
Most don't last very long.
So you have to enjoy them while they are still around.
And hope that your favorite models will last.
How can they improve the site?
Simple.
Stop updating sites that feature stupid plots, poor dialogue, poor acting, and start updating this site, with attractive models.
There was no reason to stop updating this site.
The videos were inexpensive to make. No reason at all, except for a lack of appreciation of what they were creating. They stopped making good porn, and concentrated on making shit porn.
However, they are smart enough to use attractive young girls for their models.
So they aren't completely stupid.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network, a fine teen-oriented network featuring young, attractive models.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Excellent quality videos and photosets.
-The photosets are made with real photos, not screencaps.
-You can stream the photosets in your choice of small, medium or large size.
-Videos offered in 270p, 360p, 540p, 720p, 1080p, 4K.
-You can stream movies in .25x, .50x, 1x, 1.5x, and 2x runtime.
-Members allowed to comment on scenes. Both positive and negative comments allowed. Many of the comments are stupid. But it's nice to see how opinion can vary so widely.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
Cons are minor. This is a fine site, a fine network.
-The plots are really stupid. Think of the videos as farce, which makes them more acceptable. Except that farce is more sensible than the videos shown at this site.
-There is a control to set the interval for a slide show, but the control is hard to use, it keeps disappearing from the monitor, so you can't set the rate the photos change very easily.
-The model page has very little information on the model. Here's a sample bio, for Gia Ohmy, a cute 22-year-old from the US.
My guess is that the site operators don't understand English very well, and when they write "Biography" for the model's page, they fill the section with porno-style blurbs, instead of giving any biographical facts.
"Look at the tits and ass that Gia Ohmy can't help but show off. Her big jiggling assets are almost as hot as her sex drive. Gia can't wait to get her clothes on the ground and a hard cock between her thighs, so don't delay this shorty's pleasure."
Bottom Line:
The videos shown as POV are just regular videos shot through a single camera. On a TBP review, a reviewer writes: "POV clearly focuses on point-of-view scenes where the male performer doubles as the cameraman." But that doesn't apply to the Princess Cum site. The cameraman is not the stunt cock. So my guess is that the term is loosely used.
The site theme is young girls getting fucked.
A sample plot summary is:
"Gia Ohmy is lying in bed reading with her vag and ass hanging out of her miniskirt when her stepbrother, Apollo Banks, walks past her open door. Apollo debates whether to say anything, but when he comes back past Gia's door he sees that she's now on her back, skirt hiked up to expose it all. He goes into Gia's room to ask what's going on. That's when Gia informs Apollo that she's been reading an article about how airing out her pussy before sex is very important. Gia has a date tonight, so she thought she'd try it out right away.
Apollo is as understanding as he can be, but he also points out that Gia has some bed fuzz on her pussy lips. She asks him to take it off for her, which prompts her to suggest that maybe she has really exposed herself because she secretly wants to fuck her stepbrother. Gia goes on to tell Apollo that he has 30 seconds to finger her pussy or she's putting it away. How could Apollo say no? He goes right to work finger banging his stepsis as she moans her delight. Since Gia can feel that Apollo is nice and hard, she unzips his jeans to get at his hardon. Her handie quickly turns into a blowjob as her horniness overcomes her.
When Gia rolls onto her back and spreads her thighs, Apollo just goes ahead and shoves it right in. It turns out that Apollo's stepsis is a wildcat in bed! She wants it on her hands and knees in doggy, which is the perfect opportunity for Apollo to worship her big ass with his hand. Gia rolls onto her side for some deep spooning sex next, but despite her orgasms she's not finished with Apollo yet. Pushing her stepbrother onto his back, Gia climbs on top and sinks her hairy pussy down onto his fuck stick for a stiffie ride. She winds up on her back with Apollo going to town as he tries to peak. When he's ready to cum, Apollo tries to pull out. Wrapping her legs and arms around him, Gia holds her stepbrother in for a creampie. Dripping with Apollo's cum, Gia is all satisfied smiles."
Gia Ohmy is an attractive blonde. Very pretty face, voluptuous body. Nicely photographed and videotaped. I only wish the plot made more sense. That there was some element of seduction or build-up to the sex, instead of foolishness. But the site specializes in foolish plots.
And they like to re-use some plot elements.
For example, the stunt cock often apologizes for not pulling out before he came.
And the girl says it doesn't matter. She loved it.
So the guy says it's lucky she's on birth control.
And the girl smiles and says she isn't.
So the guy looks startled, and confused.
While the girl just giggles or smiles happily.
So plots are minimal or stupid.
But the models are attractive.
And the sex is mainly bread-and-butter sex. Cock sucking, pussy licking, vaginal penetration, creampie.
The videos are professionally shot. Good camera work, good lighting and good colors, nice sets.
I don't appreciate the stupid plots. You're supposed to laugh at the models who are acting like sex-crazed idiots. But it's not my niche.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Prime network, which includes Club Sweethearts and Digital Desire, two excellent young adult sites.
-OldieX is a large site, with 582 videos. You have 571 photo sets, so almost all videos have a matching photo set.
-Videos for the last few years are available in 540p, 720p, 1080p, 4k. For both streaming and downloads.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads, as far as I can tell. Note: I don't download much, so I have little practical experience with download limits.
-The models are real people. What I mean is, you get old farts playing old farts. And young teens playing teens. And people in their twenties and thirties and forties playing their age.
-This is reality porn. Not a lot of plot. You get people on a cheap-looking set, and they start touching each other, kissing, fondling, having sex, don't need much or any build-up to the sex. Cheap street clothes (or cheap lingerie for the females sometimes), they speak in a foreign language.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
There are no subtitles, but you don't need subtitles anyway, because whatever they're saying is basically meaningless bullshit, other than the moans, groans, uuuuhhhsss, and other noises, which translate well enough.
-I think this site is one of the better example of reality porn, where you can believe what you are seeing, since there's almost no plot.
-Although videos and photosets are done on a shoe-string budget (cheap sets, cheap street or bedroom clothes, probably paid the models next to nothing), the technical qualities of the videos are good: good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control.
CONS(START OF):
-The model page is very limited. You don't get a nice thumbnail of the model by herself/himself, to show what the model looks like. You don't get much personal information on the model. What you get is links to the model's videos. Since the models are European, you can't even tell from the name whether the model is male or female,
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
since the thumbnails show a group photos, instead of a thumbnail of the individual model.
-Note: even when the models speak in English, their accent can be so heavy, I can't understand what they are saying. I think they are speaking Engish, but to me, it's just mangled speech.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Prices are in Euros. Not US dollars. So you will probably be charged a conversion fee.
-Login details are assigned, can't choose your own.
-Default file name is "720p_fullcomplete", so you have to manually change filename to include the data you want.
-You have to enter a captcha to login. But the captcha is easy to read.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site theme is a young person having sex with an older person.
Not my favorite niche. With 582 videos and 571 photo sets, this site should offer plenty of content for anyone who enjoys old vs young sex.
You have grandmas fucking young studs. Teens fucking older guys. Lesbian sex of old-young. Group sex mixing young and old in various ways, straight and lesbian.
Since I like pretty young models, this site does not appeal to me. There are some attractive young models, but they are mainly fucking older people.
Setting aside my personal preferences, I think this is might be a fine site for people into old-young. You get a wider range of old-young than I've ever seen. Most of the old-young sites I've seen are old guys fucking young girls. There are some sites with old women with young studs, but those sites are the minority, as far as I can tell.
However, this site goes far beyond what I've seen: this site mixes old-young for young-female/old-male, younger male-/older female, young-old lesbian, group sex with a young couple mixing it with an older couple, group sex with lots of young and old people going to it, multiple guys on an old woman, if you can think of any combination, they probably have it.
One of the sub-sites in the OldieX site is cuckoldest.com, which has husbands watching their wives get fucked by other men.
Adult Prime also has a live chat channel. I'm not into live chat, but this channel has a lot of attractive young teen models. The live chat channel has a wide range of models: mainly young, attractive models, but also young models on the heavy side, middle-aged models with different body types.
If you're into old-young and like unattractive older men and women, this is a fine site with plenty of content.
The videos were cheaply made (street or bedroom clothes, low-rent sets, amateur models), but the technical qualities of the videos are very good (good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control). So the videos are extremely watchable.
There is a photoset for almost every video. The photosets are nice quality screencaps, averaging 100-170 screencaps per set. The photosets are worth collecting as a fast way to review a video.
Giving the site a score of 85.
I wish the site more easily identified the name of each model.
And gave the downloaded video and photoset file non-generic names. Instead, you have to re-name each video and photoset to include the data you need.
But you get a large amount of good quality videos. And the screencap sets are nice quality.
So if you're into old-young, and really enjoy unattractive-looking people, this is a fine site.
And the cuckold adds some queer/kink content.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. You can usually find a holiday special of $60/year. The regular price with a PU discount is $120.
-New Sensations has around 15 sites. You get access to all the sites, none require a premium upgrade.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. No captcha or other problems.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-They did a network update, and made the public page and member pages refreshed with bigger thumbnails that makes the network and sites more appealing.
-A lot of attractive models. You can find loads of attractive models at many hard and soft porn sites. I can't say these models are exceptional, but many are attractive to very attractive.
-You can stream videos, or download them, in 720p, 1080p, 4K in 2 different bit rates for each definition.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-Last update was in February 2021.
-A page of ads when you log in, before you get to the member's area.
-Ads on every member page.
-The plots are mainly simplistic. Most porn stars/models are not very good actors. So you're depending on the model's good looks and acting ability to create some heat. Some models are fine actors, or they have some chemistry that jumps off the monitor to make a photo or video have heat.
-Lots of toy use. That's a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. Hitachi wand (the big-sized vibrator) and Sybian saddle (a vibrating dildo that a woman can ride) in different videos.
-A fair number of the videos are interview of the models. Again, a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. If I like a model, I'm more interested in her interview.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is lesbians having sex.
I think the plots are minimal. Many of the plots involve sex between a younger woman and an older woman (older woman in her late 30s or 40s). Many of the older women have breast implants.
Ivy Wolfe is a slut. I think she retired from porn in 2018. Cute face, slender body. She can put on a show. When I say "slut", I don't mean to be dis-respectful. I'm teasing. Ivy is lovely (she's more like cute or slightly pretty) and fucking hot.
Compare her to Alya Stark (aka Arya Stark), who is physically lovely, but her porn scenes are more sensual, not the same eroticism or heat, but Alya Stark is so gorgeous, you just want to kiss and lick and fuck that gorgeous face and body for hours.
Both models put on a show that's believable, and the models really seem to be getting off.
Note: Ivy Wolfe appears in Four Finger Club and HotWifeXXX.
Alya Stark does not appear in New Sensations, but I used her an example of a lovely young model (physically) who puts on a wonderful show.
Some of the videos have really attractive women.
And the videos can be slow, sensual, fun. Watch Eden Arya (aka Eden Addams) and Riley Nixon having some fun. Video titled "Eden's Trust Riley Will Take It Further", posted 08/18/2017.
Bottom line: there are plenty of cute or attractive models at the site.
And many of the videos are definitely worth watching.
You just have to sort through to find the videos that appeal to you.
The main benefit of the site is that it's part of the New Sensations network, which has a lot of attractive models, and a lot of videos and photosets that are worth examining.
I don't think this is one of the better lesbian sites, because I don't enjoy too many of the videos. But that's just me. If you personally enjoy more of the videos, then the site will have more value for you.
But I definitely think the site (and the network) are worth joining. Especially if you can find a $60/year membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Download managers are allowed, but please configure them to open one stream only to the server at the same time or your account will be blocked automatically. I rarely use a download manager, so this isn't a problem.
-Username and password are case sensitive. I copy and paste username and password, so no problem.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Very unusual for a porn site.
-CCBill was the default biller. An excellent biller. Never had a problem with them. Cancelling my membership should be easy.
-Access to the site is automatic, with no login needed, if you have cookies enabled.
-The technical features for viewing a photo or a photoset online are amazing: you can easily enlarge the photo by small percentages, and view portions of a single photo in detail. The best site for viewing photosets online I've seen so far. With amazingly beautiful models. The problem is that the photos seem so sterile. These are softcore glamcore photosets, but to me, they are non-erotic.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Movies have a trailer, if you want a preview of the video.
-Photographs are clear, crisp images, excellent colors and lighting, but surprisingly sterile, non-erotic, even though the images are of very lovely nude women. I don't know why the site is so unappealing for me. The models are uniformly gorgeous.
CONS(START OF):
-Comments (on photosets and videos) are allowed, but they are moderated. Unconstructive remarks or insulting/derogatory language or html links will be deleted. Many of the comments I've seen so far are not worth reading.
-In spite of the lovely models, a defect of the site is the over-use of the main photographer, Petter Hegre. He can lack imagination in his photos. Metart and many other glamour sites use a combination of contributing photographers, so you get different styles and ideas. Whereas at Hegre, the photosets can start to seem repetitious, in spite of the physical beauty of the models.
Bottom Line:
-It's been many years since I was a member of Hegre. The site has many of the most beautiful models in the world. What is different from Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy or other fine glamour photo sites? Nothing much, as far as I can tell. All these sites (and others) feature gorgeous women stunningly photographed. I'm not a connoisseur: I just enjoy looking at fine-looking women.
-The main value of any glamour porn site is the model listing: how attractive are the models?
The models at Hegre are among the most attractive women on the planet. If you're into fine looking women ages 18 to early 30s, this site has plenty of models that are worth viewing.
I'm looking at hannah, a white, slender model born April 1999, which would make her 22 years old. She is fucking gorgeous. She has 6 galleries and 2 movies at Hegre.
The photosets can be repetitious.
Hannah has 6 photosets.
In 5 of them she is completely nude, from start to finish.
In one set she starts off wearing a black top, black pants, black shoes and black socks.
The main difference of the 5 completely nude sets is:
1 set has a floor and a wall, and is empty of anything except the naked model.
A second set with a floor and wall, empty of anything except the naked model.
A third set with a floor and a wall(the wall is different in this set, a brick facade), and the floor is different (a wood floor), but the set is empty of anything except the naked model.
1 set has a rectangular pad, that the model can sit on, stand on, lean on.
1 set has a chair, that she can sit on or lean on or ignore the chair.
The 5 sets seem to have been shot in a hurry, with the model told to assume different poses in a minimal setting, with little or no thought to artistic expression or showmanship or anything: just minimal photos of a lovely young girl, but interest fades slowly or quickly, when you realize that's all there is. Which is a wasted opportunity of this model. She deserves better.
Looking at the photosets at Hegre, I realize, anew, that I appreciate my Metart photosets so much better. Metart presents lovely women in a variety of interesting, softcore poses. I can spend hours looking at some Metart sets, while I quickly get bored looking at a Hegre photoset (even if the Hegre model is just as lovely as the Metart model). There's more variety in the Metart photos compared to the Hegre photos.
And I begin to realize why it's been years since I re-joined the Hegre site:
Out of four leading softcore glamour sites (Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, Hegre), I rank Hegre at the bottom. All 4 sites have a collection of lovely young models. But the Hegre photosets are the least interesting of the 4 sites. That's my personal opinion, of course. But I've been a member of all 4 sites many times, and I've seen most of their photosets, and the only site I've joined with a lifetime membership is Metart, of those 4 sites (I have a lifetime membership to Sexart and The Life Erotic, part of the Metart network, but Metart is the only one of those 3 sites that I visit regularly.)
-Download options for a photoset at Hegre are:
(sample size for a photoset of 56 photos):
Mega Size Edition | 14000px, 182 MB
Super Size Edition | 10000px, 155 MB
Large Size Edition | 6000px, 39 MB
Collectors Edition | 3000px, 12 MB
Quick View Edition | 1200px, 2.8 MB
-Download options for a movie are:
Downloads
4K Ultra HD 2160p video | 3840x2160, 1.9 GB
Full HD 1080p video | 1920x1080, 969 MB
HD 720p video | 1280x720, 395 MB
SD 480p video | 848x480, 256 MB
SD 360p video | 640x360, 144 MB
SD 240p video | 416x240, 93 MB
The photography at Hegre is wonderfully crisp and clear, and the site has the best software for examining the photos in detail or in a slideshow.
Most photosets feature a model who is completely nude from start to finish.
And the set for the model is on is minimal: you have a model, and an empty room.
Or maybe there is a chair in the room.
Or maybe there is a mattress in the room.
That's it.
Is it lack of imagination, or striving for minimalism?
I imagine a photoshoot can be done quickly, because you tell the model to assume different poses, and shoot her quickly.
My reaction is to quickly lose interest, no matter how lovely or attractive the model can be.
I find the content at Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy is far more interesting and worthwhile viewing.
They are constantly adding new models to their catalog.
Almost all models are slender, white European teens (or early 20s).
The site has videos. The videos feature female masturbation, lesbian, some videos with a guy getting a hand massage on his penis.
Newer videos have 480p, 720p, 1080p, and 4K definition available.
CONTINUED IN THE FIRST REPLY BELOW:
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network.
-The network has over 1500 videos, and about 14 sites.
-All the sites are available with a basic membership. No premium sites, no extra charge for downloads.
The Brutal X site has 41 videos.
-The videos have a posting date for when they are added to the site.
-Navigation is simple and easy. A small site of 41 videos, so you would expect to be able to scan all the videos easily.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
Cons:
-Somehow, the dirtyflix.com site has both a secure and a non-secure page to login.
When you login through the non-secure page, you can see a popup on your browser that warns you the page is not secure, and is liable for hacking.
-Most of the time, the member pages are non-secure. But there might be member pages that are secure. I don't understand how a site can have both secure and non-secure login pages.
-Slow update rate. The site was started around Oct 2015, and only has 41 videos. So in 6 years and a few months, they've added 41 videos, which works out to 1 new video if they remember about the site. The most recent video was posted on Mar 8, 2021. So the site might be an archive site. Or, if they remember to start posting again, just another example of forgetting to post new videos.
-There is no PU discount for site membership. The listed price is $120/year, or $30/month. But if you wait for a holiday special (given throughout the year), you can join for $60/year.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The public page was updated last year with larger, brighter thumbnails to illustrate some of the network videos. But the member pages need the thumbnails to be updated as well: larger, brighter thumbnails to illustrate what the models look like: most of the models are attractive, which is the main draw of the site and network, so they need to show the models attractively, to draw customers in.
-The plots of Brutal X are simple but effective: a Russian man wants to teach a woman to be a woman, and rough sex is the best teacher. An American man wants to teach a woman a lesson, and he uses rough sex to teach her. But Russians have the advantage, because they know how to treat a woman. While Americans are less sure, and it takes a while before they realize that brutal sex is the answer to a woman's dreams.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Note: The Brutal X review at The Best Porn was posted in 2016, and has not been updated.
That review states that a membership in Brutal X gives you access to Brutal X, without any bonus content.
Since that time, Brutal X has been merged into the Dirty Flix network, which has around 14 sites you get access to.
Also, the Brutal X video count has increased from 10 to 41.
Site stats:
Videos: 41
Update rate: very slow. Last update was Mar 8, 2021. Before that, they posted 1 video per month, on average.
-Video runtime is 20 to 30 minutes.
-All the videos, even the earliest, are available in low, medium, high, and 4K definition.
Site theme: brutal sex.
With a title of "Brutal X", you expect over-the-top brutal fucking. Which is not quite what you get. I've seen sites where the fucking was over the top, harsh, brutal, and the women were screaming in pain. This is porn I'm talking about, so the screams were probably fake. And the sex would have been consensual, or it would be illegal.
Brutal over-the-top videos seem to show over-the-top brutality of one or more guys banging away on a woman, pulling her arms, slapping her face, ass, titties, pussy, jamming his/their cock(s) into the woman's mouth, pussy, ass, twisting her into painful positions, etc. during the fuck. The fuck seems more like torture than sex.
But that's not the case at Brutal X. This is where sweet, young innocent babes in nice dresses parade in front of young handsome stunt cocks who want to dominate these young pussies. So the stunt cocks grab the girl's ass, gropes her tits, the girl is fighting the guy because he's coming on too strong, the background music is blaring away to heighten the tension, the girl drops to the floor, the guy pulls out his cock (a sign of male aggression common in porn), the girl opens her mouth (Russian women have an instinct to open their mouth when they see a dick waving in front of their face), and the guy shoves his dick into the open mouth.
The girl is making noises (uuuhhhh, oooohhhhh, aaaaahhhhhh) that are not excitement but rejection, but the strong, powerful stunt cock ignores her resistance and treats her like the sex doll she was meant to be.
Russian men are my heroes: they know instinctively how women want to be treated.
The next time I go to the mall and find a good-looking teen, I will jump over all her while I listen to her moans and groans of excitement.
And if anyone in the crowd objects, I will show them the tapes that prove I was only exercising my manly rights.
Power to the male animal inside of all us red-blooded American men (who are really pussies compared to Russian men).
Actually, during the sex action I've seen at this site, the woman's moans turn softer, and maybe she's starting to enjoy the sex. I sure hope so, since the guy seems to be going all out, sticking his cock and fingers into the woman's mouth, slapping her ass, her face, sticking his cock into the woman's pussy, trying to blow his wad while giving the woman the best fuck of her life. And that all takes place in the first 3 or 4 minutes.
After that, what's left?
After all, the video runtime is 20 to 30 minutes.
So, it's more of the same.
More slapping, fucking, moaning, cocksucking, gagging (from the guy's cock buried too deep in the girl's mouth, maybe a little ass fucking for variety, the guy sticking his finger into the girl's pussy and ass and then putting it into the girl's mouth, and this continues for another 15 to 25 minutes. So both the guy and the girl get a real workout.
Or a different plot might be a guy's stepsister is acting like a real bitch, so he rips her clothes off and treats her to brutal sex.
As far as I'm concerned, I got the picture in the first 5 minutes or less.
My reaction was: brutal sex is not my favorite niche.
This site is basically boring for me.
And when the sex is more brutal, at other sites, it's just a fucking turn-off for me.
Other people might enjoy watching brutal sex videos.
I consider this site to focus on tame brutal sex.
But there are other sites that focus on rough brutal sex.
Different strokes for different folks.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Spoiled Virgins is part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. You get access to all 35 sites in the network with membership in any one of the sites.
-The main value in the site, and the network, is how many attractive virgins there are. These tender young teens are willing and able to give your their virginity because, underneath, they seem to be horny as hell. I wish, growing up, I knew how horny virgins really were.
-Defloration.com is a site from a different network that focuses on virgins losing their virginity. That site seems to give a more clinical approach to sex, where the sex is less spontaneous, but it also has many cute girls. However, I don't know if all the girls are really virgins, since I've seen many of them at other porn sites. How many times can a girl lose her virginity? In porn, evidently you can stay a virgin even if you get fucked in the mouth, the pussy, and the ass time and again.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Photosets are from 60 to 300 photos. I think these are still screencaps, but the improvement over the I Fucked Her Finally screencaps is large.
-You can select the interval of the slideshow for a photoset from 5 seconds to 25 seconds.
Or you can download the photoset for viewing later.
-There are no limits for streaming or downloads.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is the site is not updating.
They don't show the posting date for most videos posted at the site. But checking the list of recent updates to the network, there hasn't been a video posted to the site since April 23, 2021. It's entirely possible there hasn't been an update to the site in years.
-The site (and network) doesn't bother to date the videos posted, except for a listing of recent videos.
-Videos download with a generic file name, spoiledvirgins_182_1280.mp4. So you have to re-name the file to show the model's name and video title.
-The earliest videos have a very low definition, 320x240.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
More recent videos have your choice of definition from 288p through 2160p.
-Videos are often in Russian, with no subtitles. But the sex is what counts. The plot is either minimal or senseless.
-A lot of pre-checked cross-sales on the join pages.
-Almost all links work to stream the videos. I only found one video that had no link to stream the video, but you could download it to watch it on your PC. The video with no streaming link was titled "Young virgin girl fucked for the first time under a doctor's care".
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Virgins are the real thing. There's nothing better than knowing you're the first one to bonk a pretty girl. And if you have a good buddy available, the fun is more than doubled by having a threesome with a virgin.
There's one video where a guy gets to fuck a virgin with professional medical help from a nurse. The virgin isn't feeling well, so a nurse comes over and tells the virgin she needs to get fucked. The virgin starts sucking her boyfriend's cock while the nurse supervises. Then the boyfriend starts fucking the virgin on the couch, the no-longer-virgin is so excited the boyfriend flips the girl over and gives it to her doggy style, and finishes off with a facial.
From virgin to slut in one happy experience. And the nurse is there to make sure the virgin and her boyfriend end up completely satisfied. This is reality porn at its finest.
The videos at this site are better than the videos at the I Fucked Her Finally site. The camera work is better, the lighting is better, the sound control is better. The models are presented better.
In Russia, they often have a medical doctor or a nurse available, to check if a virgin needs to be deflowered for health reasons. This is useful if your girlfriend is afraid or reluctant to have sex: you have a medical professional backing you up. And in almost all the cases I've seen, the virgin ends up happy to get fucked.
I'm thinking of moving to Russia, where there are lots of cute virgins, and the they are willing and eager to get fucked by older men.
This site does not feature older men fucking young virgins. But there are sites in the network where older men are bonking cute young teens. It gives me hope that I too can find happiness in Russia.
Giving the site a score of 85. The site is not updating. I think the plots are ridiculous. The girls are attractive, and the videos are nicely shot. But the videos lack heat. There are better sites in the network you have access to.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site features models who are mainly young white, slender teens who are role-playing ballerinas. The models are mainly attractive and flexible, which is important when getting fucked. I get out of breath when bending over (I'm in my 70s), but these girls twist their bodies into impossible shapes and keep on fucking. You have to admire them for endurance and enthusiasm.
-The models are mainly A-list models. You've seen them at many different porn sites, if you're familiar with teen porn sites. Gina Gerson, Riley Star, Alexis Crystal, Sarah Kay, Piper Perri. Some of them are also featured at softcore photo sites like MetArt. Maybe it's psychology, but seeing them at MetArt and then at hardcore sites gives you a different perspective on these models.
-Easy navigation. Hot links to switch between the available sites.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-Your choice for streaming and/or downloads definitions from 270p through 1080p.
-Zip file for photo sets and screen caps.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
The photos were shot by a professional photographer: nicely focused, nicely centered, well lit, crystal clear images. The photo sets for a video are worth collecting.
-Exclusive content.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is this is an archive site. Last update was Sep 8, 2019. But even before then, updates were very spotty, going for months between updates.
-An ads splash page when you log in. But there are some very low-priced ads shown.
-You get access to the Nubiles.net site with a membership. Nubiles.net is the star of the Nubiles Porn network, but access to Nubiles.net is not as well advertised as the rest of the Nubiles Porn sites. Be sure to visit the Nubiles.net site, to see what the site has to offer. I think Nubiles.net, by itself, is worth the subscription price for the entire network. This con is that the Nubiles.net site is not clearly shown to be part of the network access.
-Small site. 39 videos total. Plus a photo set and a screen shot set.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
I don't know why there is a screen shot set, since the photo sets are excellently shot, with over 100 photos per set. If you have a fine photo set, what purpose does the screen cap set of the same video serve?
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Although this is hardcore, it's like a David Hamilton film with a harder edge: the set is a large room with a barre and the model and a stunt cock.
The plot is simple: an attractive young girl is practicing ballet, the stunt cock appears, he might help her with her practice for a few moments, but then they quickly get down and dirty. Except it's not dirty sex, but clean sex. The image of the young girl, often with her hair tied back in a bun. Wearing a see-through dance costume, simple yet showcasing the petite body.
Piper Perri, one of the featured models, has such a sweet little ass, seduces Skye West, and then Ryan Driler, the stunt cock, joins the fun. It's slow and sensual, and all 3 performers do a fine job.
The photography is crystal clear, the images focused and well lit, the technical features are excellent.
The simple, mainly empty room highlights the action: no distracting furniture to get in the way of your viewing. You have the ballet barre, the models, and that's it: Simple yet effective. The yummy female flesh is on view. Some of the models are fucking attractive, to put it mildly.
As I said, it's a small site. I have no idea why they didn't continue making more content for the site.
The site theme is simple. The production costs should be low, because the set is a large, empty room, simple costumes, the site theme is visual and easily captured. I think the producers of the network are idiots, because I really enjoy this site, versus the sites with lame plots that tax the models with limited acting skills and stupid dialog. Maybe the producers think the sites with lame plots and poor acting are funny, and they get a chuckle out of making stupid faux incest videos?
What I mean is, with such a clear, uncluttered scene, you can focus on the bodies of these cute young teens, and the camera does a fine job showcasing their tender young flesh.
Giving the site a score of 85. It's a small site. The theme is simple and easily filmed, and the videos (and photo sets) are excellent teen porn. Much more enjoyable than many of the videos at other sites in the network. I think they made a mistake by not updating the site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Time network. Which means you get a massive amount of quality porn with your membership.
-Customer support from FameSupport, which has a live chat line that is answered almost immediately. Support is 24/7, for live chat, email and telephone. Probably the best online support I've ever had, because of the live chat option.
-Videos are available for download and streaming from 160p thru 2160p.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, which seems like a huge amount of data to download.
-There is a photo set gallery for each video. The photo sets run around 35 photos per set, which seems small.
-Lola Fae, Chloe Foster, Jill Kassidy, Sophia Lux, Bunny Colby, Scarlett Sage, are just a few of the attractive models appearing at the site.
Cons:
-As part of the Adult Time network, you also get navigation problems: finding all the content at this site, or at other sites in the Adult Time network, can be a real headache.
-The photo sets download with a default numerical file name. So you have to rename them with the model's name, site, title, and posting date.
-The photo sets are OK photos: could be much better quality, especially when the models are cute. They are better than some screen caps, but you wouldn't collect them for presenting the models attractively, even when the models are naturally attractive.
-The videos often have a plot leading up to the sex. But that just shows how poor some of the models are in acting. However, I forgive them for poor acting ability, especially when the models are cute.
Bottom Line:
There are plenty of lesbian sites online.
I think Girlfriends Films is a good lesbian site. Not great, but good.
You have some very attractive young models.
You have a mix of young and old lesbians, with different body types.
They add a plot to create greater meaning for the sex, but the plots don't mean much.
Add weak plots with weaker acting skills, and like most porn, you have to turn off your brain to enjoy these videos. There are some sites that have interesting story lines, and the models and stunt cocks do a decent to good acting job, but these are in the minority. Pure Taboo comes to mind, and Viv Thomas has some very fine scenes. But Pure Taboo and Viv Thomas are premium porn sites, watching their videos is like watching a cinematic movie.
Giving GirlFriends Films a score of 85. If you're into lesbian porn, the Adult Time network has several channels that fit the bill, plus other channels that have some lesbian porn.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Exclusive content.
-This is an excellent glamour network with lots of lovely models. The selection of models ranges from merely attractive to fucking gorgeous. The star of the network is The White Boxxx, where they made an art form of taking attractive girls and presenting them as lovely as any movie star at her premiere. They use expensive sets, erotic lingerie, wonderful lighting, and smooth, professional videos that emphasize how lovely these models are.
-The background music at The White Boxxx is usually soft. Background music at other sites in the network can be loud, jarring. Meant to add some excitement to the video, but I find loud music to be distracting, and need to turn the volume down to make it less annoying.
-Runtime is around 20 - 30 minutes for a video.
-Some of the featured models include:
Agatha Vega, Anna ReyAriela Donovan, Arya Fae, Freya Mayer, Jessica Spielberg, Julia Red, Kenna James, Lena Reif, Lika Star, Liya Silver, Lola Myluv, Lovita Fate, Lucy Li.
Cons:
-Flash page of ads before you get into the members area.
Even after you hit the link, "Continue to members area", what opens, instead of a members area page, is another ad. Do these people understand English, or are they so focused on selling they think you're going to going to sign up for a site instead of wanting to view content you already paid for?
-Of course, there are also ads on every member page. What a suprise.
-Some of the ads are "Limited time offer". And there is a clock ticking down the time the offer is still valid. I don't have enough excitement in my life. This adds to the thrill, watching the ad before it expires. (Sarcasm). However, the ad starts with 19 hours 59 minutes. So I have plenty of time to think over the offer before it expires. However, I already have a membership in Nubiles Porn, so the ad is wasted on me.
-They've reduced the time limit that logs you out of the network. Minor annoyance, since it's easy to log back in,
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
and you get to see the flash page of ads again, before you can navigate to the members area.
-It gets boring watching the same intro section of each video that showcases the network, time after time, so there's a link that lets you skip the intro.
-The sex can be slow and sensual at the start, because they are trying to create erotic content, a visual feast. But the girls are so lovely, scenes can lack heat. Some scenes at Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, Teen Fidelity just have greater impact. But for pure visual splendor of the models, the settings, The White Boxxx is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet.
-There is a monthly limit of 100 video downloads for the network.
-A personal issue: a lot of the lovely models have tattoos. Some of the models have large tattoos that cover a lot of their body. I'm not a fan of tattoos. Think they distract from the model's beauty.
-Photo sets are tiny. Around 6 to 10 photos per set. The photos are from the accompanying video. These lovely models deserve more photos in a set. The photo sets are basically a wasted opportunity of these girls.
-All videos are offered in 240p through 1080p. Which is suprising for a glamcore network. Competing sites started offering 4K definition in 2015 or 2016.
-Network update rate is slow, about 10 to 14 new videos per month.
-Navigation can be clunky. You hit the back button, and you can be logged out of the site. Or you're still in the site, but you've lost your place in the site listing (you have to use clicks to get back the page you were viewing).
-Most sites don't update.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
BOTTOM LINE:
Lets Doe It network has 17 sites:
The different sites are meant to offer different porn themes:
The White Boxxx-333 scenes, the star of the network, is pure glamcore porn, one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet. Lovely models, videotaped in lush sets, excellent lighting that highlights the beauty of the models, expensive costumes.
A girl knows-200 scenes, a glamcore lesbian site.
Her Limit-151 scenes, a hardcore site featuring aggressive sex that pushes the models to the limit.
Horny Hostel-54 scenes, sex in a hostel.
Xchimera-35 scenes, fantasy sex that is supposed to be taboo. There were 35 scenes in Jan 2020. Then they supposedly updated the site in 2020 with 7 more scenes, but the count remained at 35. My guess is they did not update the site, just changed the posting date of 7 scenes to 2020. Which seems deceptive.
Scam Angels-50 scenes. Girls have sex with rich guys, then blackmail them.
Bitches Abroad-100 scenes. Girls travelling to different countries have sex with local studs.
Porno Acadamie-36 scenes. High school girls have sex in France.
Bums Bus-134 scenes. German girls have sex with guys who drive a van. An acquired taste. The van drivers are jerks who think they are really cool.
XXX Shades-124 scenes. Sex that is supposed to be erotic, based on the Fifty Shades of Grey movies.
Doe Projects-36 scenes. Pilots for possible series.
Relaxxxed-130 scenes. Massage videos.
Kinky In-Laws-30 scenes. Faux incest with step-families.
My Naughty Album-70 scenes. Sex between a model and her photographer in a photoshoot.
Bums Buero-53 scenes. Office sex.
Quest for Orgasm-80 scenes. Girl solo masturbation.
Bums Besuch-27 scenes. German fans get to have sex with porn stars.
Most of the sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years.
The network update rate is low: maybe 10+ videos in a month.
There are lots of really attractive models featured at the sites. And the videos, for the most part, are crystal clear images. The best sites are The White Boxxx, a great glamcore site. A Girl Knows, a glamcore lesbian site. Her Limit, extreme sex site, Horny Hostel, sex in a hostel, Bitches Abroad, where girls travelling to a foreign country hook up with a local stud, XXX Shades, where there's an element of BDSM, all have some worthwhile videos to watch. Mainly because the girls are so attractive.
Because of the slow update rate, because most sites are not updating, the 100 video download limit per month, I'm giving the network a score of 85.
If they increase the update rate, once the covid infection has passed, remove the 100 video/month download limit, improve the navigation, increase the time before you're logged out, decrease the amount of ads, the score would improve.
All these negatives mean the score is in the 80's range, where it used to be in the 90's.
They are making the network harder to use, for no reason that I can tell.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They've increased the thumbnail sizes on the public preview page, and made the thumbnails brighter, so the models, which are mostly cute teens to begin with, look more attractive.
-Dirty Flix is a network with 15 sites. You get access to all the sites, there are no sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-You can view the photo sets in an online slideshow, or download a zip file of the photo set.
-The network has hundreds of cute teens.
Cons:
-Regular membership is expensive. The listed price is $30/month, or $120/year. But you can find discounts that allow you to join for $15/month, or $60/year. I paid $60/year.
-Login is not secure. You get a popup warning you, when you enter your login details, "This conection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
Which is poor. The only way to get into the members area is through a non-secure gateway.
Note: sometimes you click on the login link, and you are directly entered into the non-secure members area, without having to enter your login details (with cookies enabled). But I would assume that is still open to hacking.
-A lot of videos/photo sets that are posted here are also posted at Videoz network, which is run by the same people. So it increases the update rate at both networks, using the same content.
-The login details (username and password) are computer generated. So have to write them down, you can't remember a nonsense string.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The photo sets only have one definition for the zip file. But because of the poor quality of the screen caps, even if the model is cute, I don't think the sets are worth collecting.
These are screen caps. The lighting varies wildly, from poor to good. The quality of the sets also varies wildly: the sets are an improvement from years ago, but can be cheap to nice.
-The photo set zip file downloads with the title of the video. But you have to manually add the model's name, the date posted, the name of the site.
-Ads on every member page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Network stats:
Movies: 1390.
Models: 727.
Photo sets: 1391.
Number of screen shots per photo set: around 50 to 80.
The photo sets are made from the accompanying video. The photo sets are screen shots. The quality of the photo sets can vary from poor to good.
The photo sets at the Wow network (a competing network) are real photos that are really excellent, much higher quality. The photo sets at Teen Mega World (a different competing network) are better quality than the Dirty Flix screen caps. The Dirty Flix network needs to invest in a good software program that will make better photos from their videos. The screen caps are better than what low-cost porn networks used to post many years ago, but compared to what competing hardcore teen sites offer, the Dirty Flix photo sets are usually lower quality.
Dirty Flix and 18Videoz are two networks offered by the same people.
The two networks are similar.
Both are hardcore teen.
The network structure is the same for both networks.
They even have the same ads for other sites at both networks.
If I had to join one network, I would choose the 18Videoz network. It has more content. 3,308 movies versus 1390. 2,249 models versus 1390. 18 sites versus 15 sites.
Both networks have a site structure that is easy to use. With a lot of attractive teen models. And a low membership price, if you find the $15/month or $60/year prices.
Both networks started off offering videos with low, medium and high definition.
Both networks upgraded their video player around May 2016.
Both network started offering 4K definition videos in November 2016.
Both sites offer a sorted video listing by newest, longest, or highest rated.
Both sites switched to a hot link of their models, where clicking on the model's name brings up her video content at the network.
I guess that Dirty Flix will soon offer a secure login, since 18Videoz now offers a secure login.
The 18Videoz network is strange: sometimes, the login is secure, sometimes it's non-secure. I'm guessing 18Videoz is switching over to secure access, and haven't finished the conversion completely. And since both networks have followed the same upgrades over the years, I assume that Dirty Flix will offer a secure login and secure member pages in the near future.
I'm giving Dirty Flix a score of 85. The 18Videoz network has more content, and more models. But both networks have the same structure that is easy to use.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of content. Domai was started back in 1997, so it was one of the earliest softcore photo sites on the internet.
-Instead of the high-gloss glamour style offered by many photo sites, Domai gives you basic nude softcore photos of young women (18 years old and older). Very little air-brushing that I could tell.
-The girls are mainly attractive to very attractive. Many of them are featured in other MetArt sites, as well as other photo sites.
-You get many of the same contributing photographers from the MetArt network, so you do get some variety of photographers, except that the overall style is simple nudes, simple costumes, nothing glamourous or exotic. Strictly softcore.
-There is a zip file for photoset downloads in low, medium, and high definition.
-Content is exclusive.
-There is a nice mix of indoor and outdoor sets.
-Codec for the photosets is efficient. The high-definition downloads are less than 300 MB, and the low-definition downloads are usually 10 MB or less
Cons:
-The main con is the price. Domai used to be, many years ago, a low-priced site (less than $10/month) that offered softcore nude photos. But it's now a fully priced site. $29.99/month, or $99.99/year. As a low-priced site, it was worth joining, because it has a large collection of nude models shot in a simple, non-glamorous style. But as a full-priced site, I would hesitate to join, because there are so many competing sites offering glamour-style photography.
-Photo only site. No videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join.
-They are running out of new photosets, so they are using some older content shot years ago.
But unless you've been a longtime porn addict, you probably won't realize that some of the content is old.
-The online slide-show mechanism is acceptable, but could be improved. You get a cropped photo with a large amount of black-space on both sides of the photo.
-Only basic data is provided on a model. Model's age when the set was posted, a few physical attributes. That's it.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Note: the downloaded model data sheet says the age shown is the age of the model when the set was shot. But it's really the age of the model when the set was posted. Which is obvious if you've followed some of these models, who look like teens in the photos, but the stated age is in their 30s. So unless these models have discovered the fountain of youth, you figure the site (and many other sites, due to covid) are using old content and posting it as new updates.
-Due to covid, the rate has slowed. It used to update 5 days a week, but now it's one new update every 3 or 4 days.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Domai offers a non-glamourous, basic softcore approach. Many years ago I was a member off and on. The catalog of models was the main attraction, combined with a low-priced membership.
But since MetArt took over the site from the original founder (Eolake Stobblehouse), they've raised the membership price, and it's now as expensive or more expensive than most glamour-style photo sites.
So in spite of the attractive models, I would hesitate to join the site.
Unless you're tired of the glamour-style approach many photosites use, and want something more basic.
Domain is a photo only site, no videos. So that could be a negative for some.
Also, the site is extreme softcore only. No masturbation or explicit scenes.
Site design is simple and basic. Which makes navigation easy.
Back when the original founder was running the site, it used to have more features: short erotic fiction, articles on how to enjoy life and erotic photography, a loyalty program to make membership even cheaper. But that was all dropped after MetArt took over.
Because some of the models are so lovely, and many of the rest are attractive, the site might be worth joining for a month or so.
But there is too much competition, both softcore and hardcore, for this site to stand out.
I'm giving the site a score of 85. Because I have fond memories of the site. But the price ($29.99/month) makes it expensive.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-X Empire is a small network of 5 sites. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all 5 sites.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You can choose your login details (username and password). Making them easy to remember.
-You get 2 confirming emails on sign-up. Stating your login details, and the terms of your membership.
-Customer service is 24/7, by live chat, phone, and email. Live chat responds within a few minutes.
-Navigation is easy. The sites are laid out clearly. You can sort by site, category (type of sex you want), model, or latest or highest rated video.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-X Empire is part of Gamma Entertainment, but they use a different biller, and support service from Adult Time. However, I assume the biller and support are first-rate, because it's part of Gamma Entertainment. The biller is olifehelp.
-This is a minor con. You have to login through the site you joined through. You can't login through any of the other sites in the network, or login through the main network.
-Membership can be streaming only, or streaming plus downloads. The streaming only membership is cheaper. Read what type of membership you are signing up for, which is not always made clear on the join page. I suggest using live chat to confirm whether you are getting downloads included.
-The public pages give you almost no information about the network, or any of the sites.
No sample videos, no model listing, nothing useful to determine whether the site is worth joining.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The Best Porn states there is a 300 GB daily limit for downloads.
Bottom Line:
Number of videos: around 1400.
Number of photosets: around 2200.
Number of photos per set: 140-200+
Newer videos can be streamed (and downloaded, if you have downloads) 360p through 4K.
The 4K option was added a few years ago.
You have 5 sites in the network.
-All Black X features black performers. Mainly male black on female black, but there are a few where it's solo black, or female black on female black.
-Dark X features a black guy on a white woman. But there are a few videos where you have 2 black men on a white woman.
Hard X features slightly more extreme sex. The largest site in the network, with 639 videos.
Lesbian X is a lesbian site, mainly white models.
The production values for the videos is good to excellent. The videos are crisp and clear images, good lighting, good colors. The models range from OK to very nice. But don't expect the models to compare to a glamcore site like the Vixen-Tushy sites, where the models are presented like movie stars. Even when you have the same models appearing at the X Empire and at the Vixen-Tushy sites, the models look so much better at Vixen-Tushy. Vixen-Tushy just makes videos with highest-quality production values (expensive sets, great lighting, expensive costumes, and a selection of models that ranges from lovely to fucking gorgeous).
The network has a lot of black performers (male and female).
And I like the Erotic X site, which uses a glamcore approach.
Navigation is easy.
There's advertising on every page, but that's standard for porn sites. Along with the pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
I'm giving X Empire a score of 85.
It's a worthwhile join, especially if you catch a holiday discount.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Time network.
-Site has 138 videos.
-The selection of models is first-rate: cute young teens and 20-year-old models.
-Login and member pages are secure(https).
-Customer support is first rate: 24/7 live chat, telephone, email.
-Videos are available for streaming and download in your choice of definition: 288p through 2160p.
-Members are allowed to comment, favorite videos, models, photosets. They leave negative comments on the site, unlike some sites that remove negative comments.
-There is a brief text description of the video, and the tags do a good job describing the action.
Cons:
-Navigation is the main con. There's so much content at the network (over 50,000 videos and almost as many photosets), that it's difficult to find the content that appeals to you.
That's good and bad: good, that you can find a lot of good to excellent hardcore videos; bad, because there will be a lot of content that doesn't fit your tastes.
-I wish there was a model listing for each individual channel, instead of a network model listing. You have over 13,500 models at the network. So the model listing is not helpful finding what models are included in a particular channel. I mean, you click on a model's thumbnail, it will show you what sites she appears in. But I want a simple listing of the models that appear at each channel.
Bottom Line:
-Jay is the role model of the father I always wanted to be:
He cares about his step-daughters.
When he catches them taking nude selfies on their phones, he tells them how concerned he is about their welfare. What if some pervert posts the pictures on the internet? The innocent girls' lives would be ruined.
Also, even though he admits he's not their real father, he says he has to know whether they are taking birth control pills: after all, you don't want a bunch of naked bastards running through the house without proper supervision.
Jay is a man I can really admire.
Also, Jay turns out to be a man with a sex drive.
He can often be found on his bed wanking off to the pictures of his naked step-daughters.
They are step-daughters, so it's not real incest.
In some states, a step-father may not legally have sex with his step-daughter, even if the sex was consensual. It's still called incest.
But in Jays POV, he believes that a little romance between a step-father and a step-daughter can bring them closer together.
Jay is a man who appreciates that step-daughters are often younger than the women he's married, so that adds freshness and spice to the sex.
Jay has a say in his household. He's not trying to take the place of their real dad, but he needs to be involved in the lives of his step-daughters. So if a step-daughter has any questions on sex, how to give a blow job, or whether anal sex is better than vaginal sex, Jay is the man to ask.
Jay is also willing to demonstrate his experience with his step-daughters, especially if they are young and cute and attractive.
Some of his step-daughters are unsure about Jay's rules, but Jay is such a smooth talker, that he soon convinces even the most uncertain girls that he is the man in charge.
Jay has practical advice for his girls: don't go by the videos you see on the internet.
They often give erroneous ideas about sex.
Sex should be between two warm, loving partners. Jay is a warm, loving partner.
Guys like Jay like their sex slow. Slow to start, then he can start pounding away as soon as the girl is warmed up.
Since Jay is married to their mothers, the sex between Jay and the girls is a secret because Jay doesn't want any problems with the women he married.
In conclusion, Jays POV is a teaching aid for people who want to marry women with step-daughters.
First, make sure it's legal to have sex with your step-daughter in the state you're living in.
Second, make sure you pick a woman with an attractive daughter. There's no sense fucking an unattractive step-daughter.
Third, tell the girl you're doing it for her own good. You want to teach her the joys of sex.
Much better than an inexperienced teen boy who doesn't know how to handle a young woman.
Be firm, be autoritative.
The step-daughter will learn valuable life lessons, while you get the benefit of teaching a young pussy how to fuck.
A classic win-win for everyone.
And if the mother does find out, tell her you did it for the daughter's sake.
Jays POV is an excellent site.
It gives you valuable life lessons on how to treat your stepdaughters.
The videos are clear and crisp, and the step-daughter models are young and attractive.
And once Jay gets into bed with them, due to Jay's coaching, they are soon able to give expert blowjobs. And to fuck like bitches in heat.
Be like Jay, and make sure when selecting a wife, that the stepdaughter is young, cute, and will fill your afternoons with sinful sex.
I'm giving the site a score of 85.
That's due to Jay being the pervert I always wanted to be, and for filming his experiences in such clear, crisp videos with these lovely young pussies.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Sometimes has a special discounted price or $5 for the first month.
Also, even though the ad did not specify any site except Erotica X, it came with access to the other four sites in the X Empire network.
-You get 2 confirming emails on joining. They give you your login details, plus the membership pricing.
-You can choose your username and password, to make remembering them easy.
-They have a nice model index.
-The content is advertised as exclusive.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So your membership should be secure from hacking, and your ISP has fewer records of your site usage.
-The network has over 1400 videos.
-The site (and network) has an active forum, where you can can interact with other members, models and staff. A lot of the comments seem useless to me: staff congratulating members on earning "Agrees badges"
CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION:
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
(if a member makes a comment, and other members agree with the comment, you can earn a "Agrees badge", or staff congratulating members for "First Anniversary badge", for staying a member for 1 year.
The forum does cover a wide range of dates and issues, and it can give some useful background on the site/network, if you're into historical data on how the network works.
-You do have downloading privileges for the photosets, which download in a zipped file of one definition.
-The photosets are collectible. The photos are focused, well-lit and provide a record of each accompanying video.
-The tags for a video describe the sex action fairly well. There is also a trailer to give you a better idea of the video action.
CONS(START OF):
-Although part of Gamma Entertainment (which owns Adult Time), you don't get access to the Adult Time network.
-The biller and support are not the regular Adult Time entities, but ones I've never heard of.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
But since they are part of Gamma Entertainment, I hope they will be OK.
-The Best Porn states there is a daily download limit of 300GB. But that seems to be a huge amount of data to download, and should not be a problem for most PU members.
-Sometimes you are timed out of the site, and have to solve 2 captcha to re-login.
-Although the confirming join email stated I had streaming and downloading privileges, it turns out I only have streaming privileges for videos. I can download the photosets.
-Slow update rate. The site averages about 2 new scenes per month. Partly the slow update rate can be explained by the covid epidemic, which has halted production for most porn studios.
-Search engine is poor: if you put in the search term "Sadie Blair", it returns videos for Sadie Blair, Chanel Preston, Cherie DeVille, Blair Williams, Edyn Blair.
-Ads on every page. But at the bottom of the page, so not so bad.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Current number of site videos: 347 scenes. The network has around 1,400 scenes.
Average runtime of video: 20-50 minutes.
Each video has a matching photoset.
All videos have the option to stream in 288p (or 360p) through 1080p.
The newer videos posted in the last few years usually have a 4K option.
You can add videos to a favorites list.
You can stream and download your favorite parts of each video, to save the "good parts".
You can play a slideshow of each photoset.
The videos and photosets have tags to help you sort/filter the content.
You can add your own tags, comments and ratings to the videos and photosets.
X Empire network has 5 sites:
All Black X
Dark X Erotica X Hard X
Lesbian X
I joined on a special discounted price of $5.00 for the first month.
The offer stated it was streaming only, with a membership in Erotic X.
It did not mention gaining access to the X Empire network of 5 sites.
However, once I joined and got the confirming emails, the emails stated I had access to streaming and downloading privileges.
Also, that I had access to all 5 sites in the X Empire network.
I don't know whether the ad I joined through was a mistake, or whether the site/network has messed up software, but I was happy to get access to all 5 sites, plus also getting full streaming + downloading privileges for $5 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month.
Note: after going to the member pages, I found that I had access to all 5 sites in the network.
I could also stream (photoplay) the photosets, and download them.
I could stream the videos, but downloading the videos required a $9.95 upgrade.
So the confirmation video was in error: I did not have downloading privileges for the videos.
Or, you could argue that downloading privileges for the photosets made the downloading claim true.
PU has a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
That is supposed to give access to the entire X Empire network, with full downloading privileges.
I would classify the videos (and photosets) as heartcore style.
Many of the videos have a plot where there is some problem between the model and the stunt cock: either they are both in other relationships, or they have a problem with each other emotionally. However, the stunt cock is supposed to be a smooth talker, who quickly convinces the model that they are right for each other, and a few kisses turn into sex. So the emotional feelings are supposed to lift the sex into a meaningful scene, where it's not just lust, but yearning and love and glowing sex.
Maybe if Disney opens an X-rated division, they can start making these kinds of films, and put them into the Adult Section of their Disneyland Parks (joke).
The selection of models is good. These are not the extremely attractive teen models of the Wow network, or even the very attractive-on-average teen models of the Teen Mega World network, but normally attractive models in their twenties. The models don't look like porn stars, but look like very attractive regular people. Not glammed up. Just good-looking females in their twenties. The videos and photosets are nice settings, nice furniture, the videos are clear, crisp, well shot and focused.
Maybe I'm bored with porn right now. I thought the videos and photosets were well done. Not outstanding, but well done. I'm not going to pay the $9.95 upgrade fee because I haven't found any special videos I want to collect. And I have so many other fine memberships already, that I don't need the videos from the Erotica X site. I have Adult Time network, the Wow network, and some other sites that are more than enough to add to my collection.
I'm giving the site, with it's access to the X Empire network, a score of 85.
It's a nice site, a nice network. But it doesn't impress me enough to extend my membership past the one month mark.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles porn network. One of the better networks on the internet.
-You get 18 sites included with a membership to the Nubiles Porn network.
You also get 5 pilot series/features that could be called sites.
The pilot series are ideas that have anywhere from 4 to 12 episodes, that, if they continue to grow, could be called new sites: except, that most of the pilot series stop shooting after a few episodes, and some other new series is started.
The 18 regular sites are listed below in the first reply to this review.
-Unlimited streaming and downloadings.
Note: I don't do a lot of downloading, so I haven't run into any limits. But sometimes a site will have download limits, and unless they express the limit clearly, I won't realize there is a limit. So be aware that when I say there are no download limits, I'm just going by my limited experience with downloads.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-One of the main benefits of the site (and the network) is how attractive the models are. Most of the models are good-looking teens.
-Login and member pages are secure: https.
-All content is exclusive to the site and the network.
-The technical features of the site are professional and excellent:
Videos can be streamed in your choice of definiton: 270p through 1080p.
-The videos can be streamed in your choice of playback speed: 0.25x through 2.0x.
Videos can be downloaded in your choice of definiton: 270p through 1080p.
Each video has an accompanying photoset. The photosets are real photos, below Metart standards, but worth collecting, especially since most of teen models are very attractive.
The photosets average 120 - 200 photos per set.
The average runtime for a video is 10 to 45 minutes. runtime grew longer as the site continued filming.
-The videos (and photosets) come with plenty of tags, and an excellent search engine.
-The video quality is crisp and clear.
Bottom Line:
CONS(start of):
The main con is that this is a tiny site, and it stopped updating in 2015, two years after it was started in 2013.
The site only has 67 videos total (with matching photosets for each video).
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is young girls being cast for the network. The casting agent is also a young girl. The vibe of the site is you are seeing a young girl acting as the casting director. She is not a hardened professional, but a young girl who seems new to porn, who is telling other young girls who are trying to break into porn to have sex with each other. And the casting director (Marissa Mei, is the first casting director), in addition to directing the girls how to put on a sex performance, also tends to get into the sex performance herself. So it's not heavy sex, but light sex, and even though it's a job where the models are getting paid to have sex, they are also trying to enjoy themselves and have some fun as well. And Marissa Mei also seems to be getting off on the girls she is directing.
I wouldn't call this glamcore porn, but the models can be very attractive: They are chosen for their looks: Marisa Mei is an attractive teen, and Catie Parker, a model in the second scene shot at the site, is 20 years old, with a sweet, lovely face, a body to die for, and an air of innocence and joy, a girl you could bounce on all day long (if you had the vigor and endurance of a teenager).
The MetArt site used to stand for Most Erotic Teens. Well, the Nubiles Casting site used most erotic teens to shoot their videos: these are seemingly sweet young girls who are exploring their sexual appetites, and doing it without any violence or pain or degradation: sweet, lovely sex with sweet young girls (and boys). So you get a mix of lesbian and boy-girl sex on display.
The sex is not wild or over-the-top, but a friendly view of models and stunt cocks who are meeting for the first time, and having sex.
The models appear to be young, at the start of their porn career. So you don't get the professional sex action that you find with most porn stars who've been doing this for years: instead, the action is mainly fresh, experimental (at least with the lesbian of two models appearing to put on a lesbian display).
The appeal of the site is that you are like a voyeur who is watching young teens meet and have sex.
It's hardcore porn, except it's like the fresh, innocent sex you would find in the teen exploitation movies from France in the 1970s or 1980s, where the sex could be tender young things first exploring the joys of sex. Sort of like the films of David Hamilton, who made Bilitis, Laura, and Tender Cousins. Except Hamilton's films were softcore porn. And the Nubiles Casting site is hardcore porn.
For me, the main appeal is the young, fresh models: they are not hardened porn stars, but fresh young beauties, even if I've seen them at other sites (which I have). But at Nubiles Casting, they appear to be at the early beginnings of their porn career.
If they started updating the site with new episodes, that would be great, because I thought this was one of the better sites in the network. A lot of the other sites in the network have really stupid plots, and the poor acting skills of the models make it worse. But for some reason, the site owners stopped updating Nubiles Casting in 2015, and this will remain a small, archive site.
A list of the network sites you have access to is shown in the first reply to this review.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month.
-Multiple choices for payment: Credit card, paypal, checking account.
-Multiple weekly updates for the network.
-Unlimited downloads and streaming.
-All content is exclusive.
-Includes access to the Nubiles Porn network.
-Login details work for all the sites you have access to (around 18 sites).
-Videos are offered for streaming and downloads in definitions from 240p through 4K.
-You can also stream the videos in 0.25x to 2.0x speed. (I don't know why you would want to change the speed, except maybe go to slow motion if you want to examine the "good" parts.)
Cons:
-Main con this is a tiny site. 42 videos total.
-Update rate 1 or 2 videos per month. But the network has multiple weekly updates.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: young girls (18 to early twenties) are porn star princesses. They demand attention from studs who are more than happy to fill their holes with cum.
That might be too abrupt a description, because these girls are also taking care of their boyfriends needs.
Number of site videos: 42
Number of photos per photoset: 70+
The photos in a photoset are real photos.
They also have a smaller photoset of screencaps. Not sure what the reason for the screencaps is.
The photoset of photos is good quality. Worth collecting, especially when the models are very attractive.
Blake Blossom is the kind of step-sister I've always wanted: a caring, loving girl (actually a woman, she's 20 years old, but a lovely face and a body-to-die-for). When she finds her step-brother jerking off in bed, she explains that masturbating is not the way to happiness: you need to find a real girl.
Her step-brother admits he admires Blake's boobs, and she's flattered. And she offers to help her step-brother because she really cares about him. So, first she shows him her boobs, then her ass. Only because she wants to help. Her boobs are large and firm, her ass is gorgeous. And the step-brother is unable to resist putting his cock into her pussy. Blake is angry at first, because she is only trying to help her step-brother stop masturbating, but then she decides his cock feels so good inside of her that it turns into a really good ride. So she and her step-brother end up really satisfied.
Moral of the story: helping your step-brother can be a wonderful experience.
These are the kind of stories that teach you about life. In living technicolor. With some good-looking cuties.
As a side note: If you're going to masturbate, soft toilet paper and some hand cream are very helpful.
But I'm not sure if doing it in bed is a good idea.
I think sitting on a chair would make less of a mess.
Just my thinking.
But if your sister comes into the room, the bed is more comfortable than doing it on a chair.
So maybe the bed is the right place, if your sister is going to help you out with your sex education.
Bottom line:
This is a small site with a slow update rate. But the videos are excellent: crystal clear, good color, and some of the models do a great job acting in what could be stupid plots: Blake Blossom has an expressive face, a voluptous body, and you just feel like she's really enjoying herself getting fucked by her step-brother. A real sweetie.
The site needs a faster update rate. But the models are cute young girls, and they do a fine job with the silly plots. Some PU members might get annoyed because the plots are so simple, but turn off your brain and enjoy the lovely girls.
Giving the site a score of 85. Because you get the site, plus access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network.
If the simple plots turn you off, you would give the site a lower score.
Also, the small number of videos hurts. But I just enjoy them, think they are funny.
They put me in a good humor.
Which is strange: because this is porn, supposed to be hot. But the videos are amusing to watch.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-$14.95/month discount offered by PU.
-TmwVRnet is part of the TMW (Teen Mega World) network.
With membership in any one of the sites, you get acccess to the entire network.
There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The TmwVRnet has 7 or 8 updates per month. That is the most updates, by far, of any actively updating site in the network. By update, I mean both a video and the accompanying photoset of the shoot.
-They upgraded the search engine for the site (and network). Now, when you put in a model's name in the search box, it returns her content at the network. Before, the search results were a jumbled mess, returning the model's content plus a slew of un-related content that had nothing to do with the model.
So the search function is very useful now.
-There is an excellent alphabetical listing of the models. With nice-sized thumbnails of the models that give you a clear picture of what the models look like. However, you have around 1,500 models at the network,
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
so searching through the model index would take a huge amount of time and patience. The model list is for the network. There is no model listing for each separate site.
-The models are late teens through the early 20s. Mainly white, Eastern European girls. Most speak Russian or some Eastern European language. Most of the models range from cute or attractive to very attractive.
-The posting date of the videos and photosets are displayed, so you know when the video and photoset was added.
-Navigation is simple. Both for the site and network. Can easily change between sites, without having to re-login. The model's page lists her contents at the entire network, not just for a single site.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. A nice feature, when many sites are starting to charge extra for downloads, or limiting the amount of downloads.
-The network offers up to 5K (2700p) videos
-Zip for each photoset. But they are not worth collecting, because the quality is poor.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
First, the photos are screencaps, and I've seen much better screen caps made from software at other porn sites. I'd guess that's partially because they were shooting for a VR video, and the software couldn't compensate for the difference from a normal film shoot. But also, the software they are using to create the photosets is not as good as the software some other porn sites are using to create photosets, because the photosets from other sites in the network is below the quality of photosets at some competing networks, especially the Wow sites. And far below the quality of the photosets at X-Art, which are probably photographs, not screen shots.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The photosets are screenshots made from some software program. The screenshots are just OK, better than the screenshots from years ago which were low-quality screenshots that were easy to recognize as screen shots. The screen shots for the last several years are better quality, but nowhere near a phtographic quality of even the lowest quality photos at photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios.
-Although the models mainly range from attractive to very attractive, there is not a wide range in age or body type or race: these are mainly white Eastern European girls of teens or early twenties. No milfs, very few Asians, Blacks or Latinos.
-Minimal information about a model is given. A model's page lists her debut age (for her first content at the network.) And that's it--except for some made-up bullshit about the model. Playboy and Penthouse back in the 1970s and 1980s made up better sounding bullshit about their centerfold models that was more believable.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Number of videos: 398
Number of photosets: 398 (photoset is made of screencaps from the video).
Number of photos per photoset: about 100
Video runtime: about 20-30 minutes.
Download choices for a sample video at the TmwVRnet site: type of file approximate file size
Oculus/Vive 3840x1920p 2.39 GB
Gear VR 2880x1440p 1.2 GB
PSVR 2880x1440p 1.03 GB
Smartphone 1920x960p 1.2 GB
MP4 1080p 588 MB
5K 5400x2700p 2.41 GB
MP4 480p 166.69 MB
For the network, on the videos posted for the last few years, I see downloads listed at 360p through 2160p (UHD).
The network started offering 1080p videos in May 2014.
Before that, the highest definition was 720p.
Videos range from 360p through the highest definition.
The network advertises that it offers 5K videos (2700p).
But I haven't found the links that downloads 5K video definition.
However, my computer equipment can only handle up to 1080p definition.
Also, since I have limited drive storage space, I normally download videos in 720p, which saves me storage space and gives me good visuals on any videos I watch.
TmwVRnet is the Virtual Reality site of the TMW network.
I don't have Virtual Reality equipment, so I can't comment on the effectiveness of the VR effect.
You can watch the videos without VR equipment, although there is a slight 3-D effect when watching a VR video at the site. Because the video was meant to be viewed as a VR video.
Actually, since I don't have VR equipment, when watching these videos, I get eye-strain. Not only does the video have a strange 3-D effect, but I start to get a headache from watching these videos.
So I'm not the primary target for these videos.
And I can't speak for how effective the VR effects are.
Unless you have VR equipment, I would guess the site has little appeal.
I'm basing that on my reaction of eye-strain from watching a few of these VR videos (in non-VR format).
Not only do these VR videos have a strange 3-D effect, but the videos give me a headache.
TMW also has live chat shows. I'm not into chat, but there appear to be over 90 live chat shows on their chat channel, which you can watch for free, or tip if you want. I don't know how they can have so many different chat shows live at the same time.
Out of the 90 live chat shows on the first page, you have:
-Most live chats are single female models
-3 chats are a single male model
-2 chats are 2 male models
-a few male-female model chats
-even fewer with a female model with 2 or more guys
-also a few with more than 1 female model and more than 1 guy
CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
