Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A network of primarily European sites. Two of the sites, The White Boxxx and A Girl Knows, are excellent glamcore sites. The White Boxxx has some of the finest glamcore videos on the internet, where they make an art of presenting attractive models in crystal clear videos.
-There's no limit on streaming the videos or photosets.
-You can download unlimited photosets. But see the CONS section why the photosets are not worth collecting.
-Content is exclusive.
-The models at some of their sites are stunning. Really gorgeous.
Cons:
-The video definition maxes out at 1080p, which is suprising for a glamcore network. Many porn sites started offering 4K videos years ago.
-Almost all videos have an accompanying photoset. But the photosets are not worth collecting. The photosets are tiny, around 10-13 photos per set. I have no idea why the photosets have such a small amount of photos. Seems like a wasted opportunity, when you consider how attractive many of these models are.
-There is a limit of 100 video downloads per month for the entire network.
-There is also a limit of 4 videos per day.
-You only get around 10 or 11 new videos per month for the network.
-Only 4 of the 18 sites are still updating. Most of the network sites stopped updating years ago.
Bottom Line:
The network covers different niches. The White Boxxx features girl/boy sex and some threesomes. A Girl Knows is a lesbian site. Both of those sites are high quality glamcore, with top-notch production values. The videos at The White Boxxx are the finest glamcore hardcore porn I've seen on the internet: the models are uniformly gorgeous (they are attractive to begin with, and every effort is made to present them looking as beautiful as possible). The settings are in a white room with one or two models and a stunt cock. The theme is sensuous hardcore. The photography (I really mean videography, but it's so crisp, clear and vivid you realize you are watching moving images) is top-notch. This isn't story-driven sex, the plot is minimal, but you are watching a premium product at The White Boxxx, the crown jewel of the Lets Doe It network
However, the value of the network is constantly going down. And since the price is not getting any less expensive, there's less reason to join the network.
-A few years ago you had access to over 40 different sites. Then they split the network into different networks, each requiring a separate membership. The Lets Doe It network has 18 sites.
-As time goes on, they keep putting limits on the members.
They started limiting downloads to 100 videos per month for the network. Before then, there were no limits.
Now they have an additional limit of 4 videos per day.
-Due to covid, the last few years the updates for the network have decreased.
They are now updating with 10 or 11 new videos per month for the network. They used to give far more updates.
-Only 4 of the 18 sites are updating. The other 14 sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years.
Inflation is everywhere. But it's stupid to keep paying the same price to get less porn, when there are so many great bargains in porn.
So I finally wised up, and will cancel my membership.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Exclusive content.
-This is an excellent glamour network with lots of lovely models. The selection of models ranges from merely attractive to fucking gorgeous. The star of the network is The White Boxxx, where they made an art form of taking attractive girls and presenting them as lovely as any movie star at her premiere. They use expensive sets, erotic lingerie, wonderful lighting, and smooth, professional videos that emphasize how lovely these models are.
-The background music at The White Boxxx is usually soft. Background music at other sites in the network can be loud, jarring. Meant to add some excitement to the video, but I find loud music to be distracting, and need to turn the volume down to make it less annoying.
-Runtime is around 20 - 30 minutes for a video.
-Some of the featured models include:
Agatha Vega, Anna ReyAriela Donovan, Arya Fae, Freya Mayer, Jessica Spielberg, Julia Red, Kenna James, Lena Reif, Lika Star, Liya Silver, Lola Myluv, Lovita Fate, Lucy Li.
Cons:
-Flash page of ads before you get into the members area.
Even after you hit the link, "Continue to members area", what opens, instead of a members area page, is another ad. Do these people understand English, or are they so focused on selling they think you're going to going to sign up for a site instead of wanting to view content you already paid for?
-Of course, there are also ads on every member page. What a suprise.
-Some of the ads are "Limited time offer". And there is a clock ticking down the time the offer is still valid. I don't have enough excitement in my life. This adds to the thrill, watching the ad before it expires. (Sarcasm). However, the ad starts with 19 hours 59 minutes. So I have plenty of time to think over the offer before it expires. However, I already have a membership in Nubiles Porn, so the ad is wasted on me.
-They've reduced the time limit that logs you out of the network. Minor annoyance, since it's easy to log back in,
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
and you get to see the flash page of ads again, before you can navigate to the members area.
-It gets boring watching the same intro section of each video that showcases the network, time after time, so there's a link that lets you skip the intro.
-The sex can be slow and sensual at the start, because they are trying to create erotic content, a visual feast. But the girls are so lovely, scenes can lack heat. Some scenes at Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, Teen Fidelity just have greater impact. But for pure visual splendor of the models, the settings, The White Boxxx is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet.
-There is a monthly limit of 100 video downloads for the network.
-A personal issue: a lot of the lovely models have tattoos. Some of the models have large tattoos that cover a lot of their body. I'm not a fan of tattoos. Think they distract from the model's beauty.
-Photo sets are tiny. Around 6 to 10 photos per set. The photos are from the accompanying video. These lovely models deserve more photos in a set. The photo sets are basically a wasted opportunity of these girls.
-All videos are offered in 240p through 1080p. Which is suprising for a glamcore network. Competing sites started offering 4K definition in 2015 or 2016.
-Network update rate is slow, about 10 to 14 new videos per month.
-Navigation can be clunky. You hit the back button, and you can be logged out of the site. Or you're still in the site, but you've lost your place in the site listing (you have to use clicks to get back the page you were viewing).
-Most sites don't update.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
BOTTOM LINE:
Lets Doe It network has 17 sites:
The different sites are meant to offer different porn themes:
The White Boxxx-333 scenes, the star of the network, is pure glamcore porn, one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet. Lovely models, videotaped in lush sets, excellent lighting that highlights the beauty of the models, expensive costumes.
A girl knows-200 scenes, a glamcore lesbian site.
Her Limit-151 scenes, a hardcore site featuring aggressive sex that pushes the models to the limit.
Horny Hostel-54 scenes, sex in a hostel.
Xchimera-35 scenes, fantasy sex that is supposed to be taboo. There were 35 scenes in Jan 2020. Then they supposedly updated the site in 2020 with 7 more scenes, but the count remained at 35. My guess is they did not update the site, just changed the posting date of 7 scenes to 2020. Which seems deceptive.
Scam Angels-50 scenes. Girls have sex with rich guys, then blackmail them.
Bitches Abroad-100 scenes. Girls travelling to different countries have sex with local studs.
Porno Acadamie-36 scenes. High school girls have sex in France.
Bums Bus-134 scenes. German girls have sex with guys who drive a van. An acquired taste. The van drivers are jerks who think they are really cool.
XXX Shades-124 scenes. Sex that is supposed to be erotic, based on the Fifty Shades of Grey movies.
Doe Projects-36 scenes. Pilots for possible series.
Relaxxxed-130 scenes. Massage videos.
Kinky In-Laws-30 scenes. Faux incest with step-families.
My Naughty Album-70 scenes. Sex between a model and her photographer in a photoshoot.
Bums Buero-53 scenes. Office sex.
Quest for Orgasm-80 scenes. Girl solo masturbation.
Bums Besuch-27 scenes. German fans get to have sex with porn stars.
Most of the sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years.
The network update rate is low: maybe 10+ videos in a month.
There are lots of really attractive models featured at the sites. And the videos, for the most part, are crystal clear images. The best sites are The White Boxxx, a great glamcore site. A Girl Knows, a glamcore lesbian site. Her Limit, extreme sex site, Horny Hostel, sex in a hostel, Bitches Abroad, where girls travelling to a foreign country hook up with a local stud, XXX Shades, where there's an element of BDSM, all have some worthwhile videos to watch. Mainly because the girls are so attractive.
Because of the slow update rate, because most sites are not updating, the 100 video download limit per month, I'm giving the network a score of 85.
If they increase the update rate, once the covid infection has passed, remove the 100 video/month download limit, improve the navigation, increase the time before you're logged out, decrease the amount of ads, the score would improve.
All these negatives mean the score is in the 80's range, where it used to be in the 90's.
They are making the network harder to use, for no reason that I can tell.
Thanks for the generous helping of information.
I believe you're right, the problem was with Firefox, not with Windows.
The new version of Down Them All is much harder to use, and I haven't tried to learn how to use it.
The old version of Down Them All was much simpler, easy to use.
At the moment, I'm kind of snowed with problems.
I got a re-newed desktop, which I'm learning to use.
And, off topic, I have a bunch of cavities in my teeth, which are going to be slow and expensive to fix, as well as freaken painful. The freaken pain has already started, and that's before they have pulled any teeth yet.
So until I get the time and energy (and ambition--at the moment, all I want to do is crawl into bed and hope the pain goes away), I won't be trying your excellent suggestion.
I think someone else suggested something similar a while back, but I didn't follow up on it, because I was thinking an older version of firefox might be more open to viruses.
But I hope to try your old version of firefox with the old down them all, because it was so easy to use.
sonofzog, another PU member, recently reported a slow connection with the Lets Doe It network.
Said that videos can take 20 minutes to download.
Said he contacted support to help fix the problem.
But he hasn't updated on whether the problem was fixed or not.
Did you contact support to see if they could increase your download speeds from the site?
I'm a current member of the site, and don't seem to have your problems.
But my Wi-Fi connection seems much slower than yours, so I'm more used to waiting for my laptop to make slow connections, and to download much more slowly.
Also, I haven't found a replacement for the Down Them All manager I used to use.
For many years I used Down Them All, it was free, simple, and easy to use.
Then Windows upgraded, and for many years, Down Them All would not work with the current edition of Windows.
Finally, they came out with a version of Down Them All that works with the current edition of Windows, but it seems much different, and I don't know how to use the new version of Down Them All. It's not easy and simple any more.
What download manager are you using?
I'm looking for a download manager that is free, simple, and easy to use.
I'm a current member of the Lets Doe It network.
Agree that the girls are mainly gorgeous. One of the main benefits of the site.
But if you're having log-in and page loading and download problems, that will ruin the value of the network.
I personally don't have those problems.
I hope that customer support was able to respond to fix your problems.
Some sites have great support, others are hit-and-miss, and other sites seem to ignore requests.
My download speeds from the network average around 2-5 Mbps, which is because I use my WiFi connection, which is on a 200 Mbps hardwired connection from Spectrum.
A WiFi connection is much slower than a hardwired connection.
But if you are able to get good download speeds from other paysites, and from a different computer, as well, I have no idea what is causing the problem.
Just random thoughts: are you using a VPN? That can cause slower download speeds, or even failure to communicate (if their server detects the use of a VPN).
Can you check your firewall to see if that is causing problems?
Can you check your connection to the internet?
If you're using WiFi, a slow or weak signal can interfere with downloads, or you can be disconnected without even realizing it sometimes. That was a common problem for me on my previous WiFi connection.
I'm not very tech savvy, but I do know there can be very many problems that reduce the effectiveness of a computer.
Hopefully, the paysite support team can check what's wrong.
If not, you should demand a refund of your membership payment.
I don't know if you can contact technical support through the live chat option, but that's the fastest way to contact them, instead of an email.
Hoping they can fix your problem.
If not, demand a refund, because you paid for a service, and you're not getting it.
(I know life isn't always fair. But you have a strong case for a refund, if the service is unsatisfactory. Or maybe an extension of your membership--if they fix the problem.)
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-An outstanding glamcore network. Many of the models range from attractive to freaking lovely.
-The White Boxxx channel, part of the network, is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet.
Not only are the models lovely, but the sets and makeup and costumes and filming techniques combine to make the models as lovely and glamourous as possible. Most models that appear at this channel are at their loveliest, and look better by far than at most other porn site appearances.
-The network has 17 channels. Some are archive channels that no longer update. But the best ones do update, especially The White Boxxx.
-Contents are exclusive.
-The network has all the trimmings of a high quality glamcore network:
-The videos can be streamed and downloaded in low, medium and high quality.
-Each video has a intro section, which can be skipped when streaming.
-The videos can be streamed in regular or slow motion.
-The videos and photo sets have multiple choices of definition.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The search covers the entire network, instead of a single channel.
-You can vote to like, dislike or choose as favorite.
-Can also comment on each video or photo set.
CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are basically minor. Especially when I consider the value of The White Boxxx channel.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The photo sets are tiny. Average 10 photos per set. Some of the models are gorgeous, and deserve a full gallery to feature their beauty.
-The search could be better. If you enter a model's name, such as Lena Reif, it returns all instances of any model with the name of Lena, instead of just instances of Lena Reif.
-This is a nit-pick. The White Boxxx videos focus on such high quality glamcore that the videos lose a little steam. They are great in visual quality and eroticism, but lack the impact of the Porn Fidelity, Teen Fidelity videos, which are high quality gonzo porn (I don't know if gonzo porn is the right term, because the Porn Fidelity/Teen
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Fidelityporn can be raw and powerful).
-Some of the channels are archive, that haven't updated in years.
-A nit-pick. Although you can vote to like or dislike a video or photo set, all I've seen are likes.
Not a single dislike of a video or photo set. Which seems unlikely.
-A nit-pick. Bottom of member page has a few small ads. Easily ignored.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Maybe I'm biased, but a few scenes from The White Boxxx channel are worth at least one month's membership price.
The first video I watched at the network was "Sensual threesome sex with a lucky guy".
This is at The White Boxxx, with Lena Reif, Shona River and Lutro (Lutro is the stunt cock).
Posted 2018-11-30.
For high quality glamcore sex, it doesn't get any better.
Watching Lena Reif's breasts swaying in lovely motion is truly poetry in motion.
Lena Reif, attractive face, lovely body, a wet dream come true.
And Shona River is a luscious babe, as well.
Except compared to Lena Reif, nobody compares to Lena Reif, great face, fantastic body, Lena Reif can put on a show that is priceless.
Network stats:
Number of channels: 17
Number of videos: 1,481
Number of photo sets: 1,468
Number of photos per photo set: 10
Bottom line update:
I am blown away by The White Boxxx channel of this network. I think it's the finest example of high quality glamcore porn on the internet. The models are georgeous, they are shown in expensive sets that highlight their beauty. The emphasis in on eroticism rather than sex, although the sex is hardcore.
There are defintely other channels in the network worth checking out.
And plenty of lovely or attractive models throughout the network.
But the crown jewel of the network is The White Boxxx channel.
I've giving the network a score of 95.
Join for a month, to sample their wares.
To see if a longer membership is to your taste.
I've joined the network for over 1 year now.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Lez Cuties is an educational site. It teaches you that no matter how cute a girl might be, no matter how young they are, you have to determine if they have lez tendencies before you get involved with them. Otherwise, if they turn out to be lezzies, you can get your heart broken.
However, if you're broad-minded, and don't mind sharing, you can get two or more cuties in your bed for the price of one. (Ha-ha. Get the joke: broad-minded.)
-The site title is appropriate. Most of the models are young and attractive: Lizzi Vogue (aka Lizi Vogue, Liz Vogue, Vika K, Pola, Kristin A, Wendy), Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, Geisha Kyd, etc. The list goes on and on. You need a porn site encyclopedia to keep track of the names these porn stars are known by, as well as the sites they appear at.
-As a site included in Adult Time, you get all the bells and whistles the network offers: Multiple definitions for streaming. Multiple definitions for downloads.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Read a review about the Adult Time network to get a full list of the many advantages of an Adult Time membership.
-The technical features of the videos are first rate: crystal clear videos, excellent lighting, good colors and sound control, expensive sets.
-Although many or most of the models are European, the videos are mainly in English.
-The site updates with 2 new videos per month. And if you want more lez content, there are plenty more lez sites in the Adult Time network, as well as lez content mixed in with the straight content in non-lez sites.
-Videos have a short text description of the plot. And there are tags that also define the video action. So you get a good idea of the plot (what little there is of a plot) from the text description and the tags.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are minor. Adult Time is probably the best bargain in paid porn today. You get a wide variety of niches, with over 55,000 hardcore videos of good quality, for a low price.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The easiest way to get downloading privileges is with a one-year membership. The normal monthly membership is streaming only. But exotics4me has written that if you contact customer service, they might offer you a monthly membership with streaming and downloading privileges, at a reduced price.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Navigation could be improved. The network has so much content, it's hard to get a listing of the content for each site. You need time and patience to find the content that fits your tastes.
-It's easy to get distracted while searching the content. Too many good looking models, too many sites that might appeal to you, get in the way of searching any one site. Maybe I'm weak minded, but I get distracted easily.
-The model page for a model has links to her videos at the network, but no bio or other information on the model.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Lez Cuties is part of 21 Naturals, which is part of 21 Sextury, which is part of Adult Time. So you get access to the entire Adult Time network.
The site title is apt: the models are almost all young, cute girls.
They do throw in some older models for variety of age and plot. But the older models are also attractive.
The site has 518 videos.
"Till Next Time", a Lez Cuties video posted 2022-03-24, features Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, and Geisha Kyd. Geisha Kyd has a boyfriend. You can tell right off the bat that Alexa Flexy and Bonnie Dolce are dyed-in-the-wool lesbians, because they are kissing each other a lot.
When Geisha Kyd drops by their house, bringing a new boyfriend, Alexa and Bonnie make them welcome. However, Geisha and Bonnie start kissing, right in front of the boyfriend, who smiles with embarrasment. Then Geisha says to her boyfriend that she's sorry, but it will have to be another time. And the boyfriend leaves.
This is why I said that before you get involved with a lez, make sure she will invite you to participate in any parties with her girlfriends. The guy is probably forced to masturbate by himself while the three girls are having sex.
Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, and Geisha Kyd are 3 really cute young girls. And they're really into each other. Bonnie doesn't want the boyfriend joining in, it's strictly girly sex today.
The boyfriend could have made the sex more interesting, if he was the take-charge type of guy.
But he's a wimp, who disappears when Geisha tells him to leave. And the 3 girls start making out.
So lots of kissing, caressing, pussy licking, finger-fucking,
Good, clean fun.
The three models are absolutely adorable.
Very pretty faces, great bodies.
And the sex is slow, gentle, the noises the models make are soft, not over-the-top, which is more realistic than fake screaming because someone is touching their breast or pussy.
So this is a fine to very fine scene.
Any quibbles about the video? Alexa Flexy has medium sized breasts. But they are so firm, even when they are being kissed, they don't move naturally. They're probably implants. I mean breast tissue is mainly fat, not muscle, so medium or large breasts, if natural, will jiggle. Flexy's breasts don't jiggle: they are not overly large, and her breasts are nice-looking, but I'm not a fan of breast implants. That's my personal preference. Many people enjoy medium or large breasts, and don't mind implants.
However, I discovered why they didn't need Geisha's boyfriend. During the sex, Alexa grabs a large plastic dildo, and uses it on Bonny's pussy. The boyfriend didn't have a cock as large as the dildo. The dildo might be plastic, instead of warm flesh, but these lezzies know how to use a dildo better than the wimpy boyfriend could use his cock. And then Geisha uses a tiny vibrator to use on Bonny while Bonny's pussy is getting fucked by Alexa. So the moans and groans get louder.
If you have an alpha male, like James Deen, who could take charge and use these women, then the women would probably have gone along with Deen. But the boyfriend was, apparently, a mild guy who put up no fuss when he was dismissed.
The moral of the story is: if you find your girlfriend is a carpet muncher, make sure she knows you're the boss man, and that you will be included in any flings she might have.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. Access to the Adult Time network makes joining this site a winning proposition. Adult Time has a huge number of really fine videos. The problem is finding the ones that will appeal to you. So you need time and patience to slog through the content, but there are, in addition to the good videos, some really fine videos that will make you glad you joined the network. And the Lez Cuties site has some very attractive models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Love Hairy is part of the Metart network. So you can expect the fine technical features of the Metart sites: Logical site structure, with easy navigation.
-Photosets have 3 main definitions: small, medium, large, with a zip file for each definition.
-The membership is inexpensive: $7.99/month, or $60/year. I don't know if this is a PU discounted price, or the regular price.
-The model listing can be sorted by alphabet or ratings (ratings by the members). The model listing is oversized thumbnails that give you a very good look at the model's face.
-Support is 24/7. This is email support. I don't believe Love Hairy support has live chat or a phone service.
-Excellent search engine.
-Lots of tags to explain/support the content(photosets and videos). Can use them to search for items of interest. But I prefer to use the model index, myself.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Nice photo player for streaming photosets.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Metart support watches the PU site, and often responds to reviews and comments about the Metart network with helpful suggestions and information.
CONS(START OF):
-Site content is not exclusive. All or most of the content has previously been posted at other sites in the Metart network.
-There are 172 videos, but the overwhelming amount of content is photos. You have 1,253 photosets. So the site is more for photo lovers than video lovers.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-They advertise daily updates, but the real update rate is very irregular. Probably because of the covid epidemic.
Bottom Line:
The site is a depository of models who have pubic hair.
The modern trend is for models to have no hair on their pubic area.
Except that some people prefer the older style where women did not shave their pussies clean.
Call it a fetish to prefer women with pubic hair. Or call it the natural look. Except even when it was normal for softcore porn to have women with pubic hair, the pubic hair was normally groomed or manicured.
A few models might have armpit hair, or hair on their legs, but those would be a definite minority. The site focuses on women with pubic hair.
Most men seem to prefer the clean-shaven pubic area on women, from the comments I've read at the Metart sites I visit.
Unless a women has a forest growing down between her legs, I think pubic hair can look attractive.
And the models at Love Hairy are definitely worth viewing. They are among some of the most beautiful women in the world. The Metart sites have, for over 20 years, been showcasing attractive teens and slightly older women.
The Love Hairy is more focused on photosets than videos, but you get both.
1,253 photosets. 172 videos. 490 models. 151 contributing photographers.
With a large number of photographers, you get to sample their different styles, although the basic approach is glamour photography.
If you're familiar with Metart.com, the main site in the Metart network, you will have seen most of the models at Love Hairy. The models at Love Hairy range from attractive to gorgeous.
You have hundreds of the loveliest women in the world featured here.
Go to the public pages of Love Hairy, and page through the model listing, and I believe you will agree with me. The thumbnails are mostly headshots, but many of these women could have been finalists in any major beauty contest in the world. They are that attractive.
This is psychological. And maybe it only applies to me. But the main Metart site, Metart.com, is too big. It has too much content. I get bored looking through their model listing, in spite of the lovely models. The physical beauty of the models loses its impact.
Although Love Hairy has fewer models (490 models at Love Hairy, versus 3,821 at Metart), and most of the models at Love Hairy also appear at MetArt, I can appreciate the models at Love Hairy more easily.
This is complicated.
Partially, it's because the brain gets overloaded with the huge amount of Metart content: too much of a good thing, and your appreciation starts to dwindle.
Partially, it's because I had a couple of bad experiences at Metart. I used to love the Metart site, even paid for a lifetime membership. But then I made a couple of comments at the site, and got flammed. This is foolish on my part, but I no longer love the site. I thought the Metart membership was supposed to support each other, but it turns out the Metart membership is composed of regular humans, who can be real dickheads at times.
I'm being foolish, and I'm aware of it, but I no longer respect the Metart membership.
I visit the site, since I paid for it, but I no longer look at the site with rose-colored glasses. Metart is a fine site with a lot of great models and great photography, but I no longer love the site.
And I'm reluctant to support any Metart sites with a paid subscription.
End of story.
Bottom line: Love Hairy is a fine site.
You have hundreds of lovely young women.
You have some of the best glamour photographers contributing their work.
You have a low membership price: both monthly, and yearly.
I don't think many PU members would go for a yearly membership, because of the slow update rate. WeAreHairy is a competing site in the hairy niche. It's far more expensive than Love Hairy, and the models are less attractive. But it updates faster, the videos and photosets are exclusive, and PU members seem to prefer it over Love Hairy for satisfying the hairy niche.
The main negative for We Are Hairy is the price: $34.95/month, or $79.95 for 3 months. Which is very expensive.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network. A teen oriented site. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network.
-Many of the models at the site and network are cute teens. I know I keep writing that there are lots of cute teens at many of these porn sites, but visit these sites, and see what you think: Michelle Can, Vika Lita, Dolce Vita, etc., these girls are cute and sexy.
Cons:
-If your login is not secure (no https in the address bar), just add the "s" character to the "http" in the address bar, for a secure login.
-Then, if your member pages are not secure, do the same: add the "s" character to the "http" in the address bar, for secure pages. Otherwise, your ISP will have a record of the pages you visit. Police can use your internet browsing records against you in court. https://members.dirtyflix.com/en/
-Archive site. Last video was added Jul 3, 2019. Before that, 1 or 2 videos were added per year. So the site never got much attention.
-The biller I used was Verotel. Not as easy as CCBill. You have to use your credit card # and expiration date of the card to communicate with Verotel, instead of your login details or other data.
Bottom Line:
This is an archive site. Stopped updating in 2019.
Site has 63 videos, with matching photosets.
The latest videos have a 4K option.
But even the earliest videos have a desktop and 1080p versions.
Along with a matching photoset for each video.
The photosets run around 80 to 100 photos per set.
-Young Courtesans is probably the best known site in the network. That is a fine site that has a simple plot that is easily filmed: a young girl needs money, so she has sex with a guy. The premise is simple but believable. Many of the models at the site are attractive, and the videos are professionally filmed: Excellent lighting, good colors, good sound control, good focus on the models.
I'm including Young Courtesans because it's my favorite site in the network. But recently they seem to have ignored the basic theme and are just adding any sex encounter for a young teen model, instead of the premise of sex for cash. Not a major defect, but the current theme seems to be a young girl having sex, instead of a young girl trading sex for money. When the Young Courtesan site first started out, they made it clear in the video the girl was trading sex for money, and it added a bit of meaning to the video.
The difference seems slight, but if you watch the older videos at Young Courtesans, and the newer ones, the newer videos lack impact or meaning beyond a horny girl having sex with a guy. With a courtesan, you expect a bit of eroticism or flavor beyond basic sex.
Although the site theme of revenge porn seems like it would be difficult to film, the site videos do a surprisingly good job with the premise. The plot is basically simple: the girl finds her boyfriend/husband is cheating on her and then she fucks some other guy and forces her partner to watch. It's not stupid comedy, but a nice hardcore sex video. The attractive models are a bonus. If they used the same plot at Pure Taboo (a site in Adult Time), the production values would be higher, the film more glossy, but this site gives you a cheaper but watchable version of revenge porn.
"Fucking in front of cuffed bf" with Vika Lita is surprisingly effective.
For one, Vika Lita (aka Belinda, Callie, Lizzy, Melissandra, Thalia D, Vialika) is a very attractive girl.
And she puts on a fine show fucking some guy in front of her tied-up boyfriend.
Actually, watching these videos, they put more thought into the videos than is first apparent.
In one video, you think the wife finds out her husband is cheating, and she has revenge sex with a friend. But at the end of the video, it turns out the wife and the husband were role playing, and he enjoys watching his wife get fucked by other men. Wich ads an unexpected twist to the plot.
I'm giving the site a score of 85.
It's an archive site, no longer updating.
An even though I think they do an okay job with the site theme of revenge porn, I personally think Young Courtesans is a better site because the idea of a young courtesan is more enjoyable than watching revenge porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. So you get a site structure that is easy to use.
-Search is good: can search by model, photographer, date posted.
-Daily update, either a photoset or a video.
-The models are attractive to gorgeous. Almost all are found at other sites in the Metart network.
-There is a short stat list for each model, showing her age, country, physical characteristics (eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, race).
-The model's page shows links to her photosets and videos at the site. There is also a separate listing of some of her appearances at other Metart sites.
-PU has a discounted price of $9.99 for the first month.
PU/TBP list the recurring price at $19.99/month, but when I click on the MetartX link from the PU site, and click on the join link, the recurring price I see is $24.99/month.
But for $9.99, you get a month's view of these lovely women, and can tell whether the site is worth a longer sub. The yearly sub is $99.95.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The site is suprisingly large.
Videos: 1270
Photosets: 1084
Models: 371
Contributing photographers: 43
-The video quality is up to Metart's exceptional quality.
-Content is exclusive.
-Videos are offered in 4k, 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p.
-Photosets are offered in low, medium, high definition.
-Metart X support is one of the finest support teams of any site. I thought it was the finest, until I joined Adult Time, which has a live chat option for support. Live chat is faster than email for response. But Metart has a fast response to emails, usually within 24 hours, and has always been helpful.
-No streaming or download limits for videos or photosets.
-If you have cookies enabled, login is automatic. You don't have to enter any login details, just go to the site, and the home page opens automatically.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Lack of variety in the models. Almost all are slender, white, late teens to twenties.
Not a con for me. This is the Metart comfort zone.
-I did not find a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. However, most times you sign up for a Metart site, there is a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Rocketgate was the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've used Rocketgate for years for different subscriptions, and never had a problem.
However, even though I assume Rocketgate was the payment processor, there was also a text message that ECHST.NET 866-452-5108 is the payment processor. ECHST.NET is a payment processor
that I've never used, as far as I can recall.
-This is a minor quibble: I tried to sign up with a different email address, and a different user name. But the site recognized me, and gave me my old username and old email address.
I was trying to use a new email address, because the old email gets over 100 spam messages each day. But I decided to accept using the old email address, and old username.
The Metart network, for years, has been trying to keep each subscriber to a single username.
Which can create problems for the user sometimes.
-Videos play with soft background music. The music is not jarring, but I don't think it adds to the mood or the experience.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Basically, Metart X is a smaller, more explicit version of Metart, which is the granddaddy (or grandmother, if you're trying to be non-sexist) of the Metart network.
The main focus of the site is lovely women masturbating. Metart is strictly softcore. With Metart X, they are trying to spice up the experience, and show you the models you crave getting down and dirty. Except not too dirty, since it's Metart.
A little wilder sex would be found at Sexart or Viv Thomas, also part of the Metart network.
The Metart network, and the Metart X site, feature women that are lovely to fucking gorgeous.
The women are late teens to early 30s in age. Most models start as teens, but a lot continue into their 20s and a few are still modelling in their 30s.
What's nice is there is not a lot of obvious plastic work done on the models: they mainly appear natural: not a lot of boob jobs, not a lot of botox. MetartX is now allowing tatoos on the models: Most Metart sites removed all tatoos by airbrushing in their photosets, but I guess the Metart network is moving into the modern age where they now allow the model's tatoos to remain on view.
I personally am not a fan of tatoos, but both men and women seem to find them attractive.
If you're a fan of Metart.com, and like the models, Metart X is a chance to view some of them in a more explicit setting. Metart is a giant site, with tens of thousand of softcore galleries, very softcore videos (that are mainly boring, in spite of the lovely models), and thousands of models. Metart X features a few hundred of the same models, in masturbation scenes.
The attraction is not so much the masturbation, but watching these fucking lovely women expose their bodies for your viewing pleasure.
I definitely think that for $9.99 for the first month, the site is worth joining.
Whether you think a longer stay is worthwhile is up to you.
But just watching some of these lovely models on display, in only a few of the better videos (better, meaning you really like the model, and also enjoy the videos she's in), is more than worth the admission price.
I should add that the videos are basically artistic, erotic porn: very gentle or mild. Don't expect violence or dirt or over-the-top acrobatics. If that's what you want, look elsewhere.
The videos and photosets are solo models. They don't bother shooting two female models together. And men? Men only appear in a few of the Metart network sites. I figure Metart doesn't think most men are attractive enough to be in porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Metart network. Excellent layout, easy navigation, all the bells and whistles of a first-rate glamour site.
-The quality of the models is the gold or platinum standard: lovely young women in their late teens or twenties.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Daily updates.
-Photosets go up to 720p, 1080p, 4K.
-Customer support is 24/7 by email. (No phone or live chat support.)
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-There is a blog, where you have a small photo (or very large-sized thumbnail) of different models, with a link to an erotic short story. The photos are clear, crisp images of these lovely young models, with a bit of erotic fiction to get you off.
-There are trailers for the videos, to give you a preview of the video.
-But the photosets and videos also have extensive tags, to describe them, that you can use for searching for content that interests you.
-No DRM. But most sites have stopped using DRM many years ago.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-If you're not a site member, you can buy individual photosets and videos. But that is expensive, and a one-month membership would be a cheaper option.
-PU discount to the site membership, $20/month, or $100/yearly. But sometimes you can find a holiday special for a lower price.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. This is a first-rate glamour site that showcases lovely young women masturbating. The women are are absolutely lovely.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Some PU members complain that almost all the models are slender, white, teen-or-early twenty models. They want more diversity in age, body type, race, whatever.
-The site favors girls with natural attributes. Some PU members (some people will always complain, no matter what happens) want girls with tattoos, implants, piercings, harder edge to the sex, for variety.
Note: if a girl does have tattoos, the site usually erases them with photoshop in the photosets.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-No bonus sites included. You get the Metartx site, and access to the live chat shows, which is standard for any Metart network site. But I'm not into live chat shows, too afraid I will get hooked and start spending serious money on these shows.
-The model index lists a few stats for the model, but almost no bio data:
The stats given include: eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, pubic hair style(shaved, trimmed, natural), ethnicity.
-The canned music at the start of the videos is annoying. Better if they deleted the music track.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: beautiful girls masturbating. You can think of this site as Metart (which is mainly softcore) with orgasm. Metart is mainly solo girl content, although there are sets with two or more girls. But it's strictly softcore.
Metartx is mainly solo girls masturbating. Some sets and videos have 2 girls. Masturbation could be considered mid-core or hardcore, depending on who you talk to.
Site stats:
Videos: 1,019
Video runtime: 10-20 minutes
Photosets: 830
Models: 306
Photographers: 40
The main draw to the site is how fucking lovely the models are.
And that the girls are masturbating, instead of the softcore solo action of nude modelling at Metart.
This site is what Playboy should have developed. Instead, Playboy magazine stopped their print magazine, and Playboy today is mainly a brand name that is remembered for its past glory from the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s.
I'm a sucker for lovely young women. And if they put on a show while mastubating, that only makes it better. Over time, since there is little or no plot, the sex can lose its impact.
But the girls are so lovely, the photography and videos shot with high quality film, nice settings: the girls are not just lovely, but adorable .
You get beautiful girls naked. The action is not rough or over-the-top, but sensual. You could say it's couple-friendly, but solo friendly, as well. Although the perfect solution would be for Metart X to send samples of these models to your home to see if they really match the fantasies they create in your mind.
Basically, as I already stated, Metart X focuses on solo girls masturbating. So it's a more erotic, more sensual site than Metart, with many of the same fine models. Many of the bells and whistles of a top-tier glamor site. A one-month membership is definitely worth your while at $20, or a cheaper membership if you can catch one on a holiday discount.
I'm giving the site a score of 90, because the girls are so lovely, the quality of the videos and photosets is outstanding, and the site is easy to use.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Probably the finest softcore porn site in the world. The site empasizes photo sets, but also has thousands of softcore videos.
-The site has thousands of models, many of them some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-The models are mainly white Eastern European teens, but there is a large number of models in their twenties and thirties as well.
Most of the older models started their careers as teens, and continued as models for years afterward.
-The site updates with 4 models each day, except for the first day of each month, where you get updates for 6 models. No other site (softcore glamour) comes close to the daily update rate of Metart.
-The photography at the site comes from hundreds of professional photographers, the largest stable of photographers of any site I know of.
Cons:
-The amount of softcore content at the site is huge. And that is a problem: You don't appreciate the quality of the photo sets because there are so many gorgeous models on display. That's human nature.
-The site structure is organized for easy navigation. The search is excellent. That's a plus, obviously, but people take the excellent organization and search capabilities for granted. Again, it's human nature to discount what you have in abundance.
-Most of the Metart videos are boring, in spite of how lovely the models can be. I don't know why. Softcore videos can be erotic, but I find that most photo sets are far more erotic than the videos. I'm guessing that there are too many factors that go into creating a video, and that it's easier or simpler to make an erotic photograph than an erotic video.
Bottom Line:
Metart is the finest softcore site I've ever found. Many of the models are some of the most beautiful women in the world. You have a vast amount of photosets, well over 2,000. You have over 4,000 models. You have no download limits for streaming or downloading. You have a daily update rate of 4 models each day (except for the first of the month, when you get 6 models).
Almost all photo sets have over 100 photos per set.
Metart started around 1999, so if you have your favorite models at the site, you can probably find several of her sets over time.
There is a brief model listing for most models, which give her physical attributes, and most model listings have a brief bio, which might be accurate (or wholly made-up, which is often the case with porn, going back to the days of Playboy and Penthouse).
Basically, I think Metart is the best softcore porn site on the internet. Because of the huge amount of photo sets of thousands of attractive girls. And the ease of navigating the site.
The membership price is no higher than any other softcore site, in spite of the massive amount of content.
However, some PU members might want Metart to have a more diverse selection of models: most models are white, slender, Eastern European teens. There are some Black, Asian, Latino models, but they are definitely the minority.
I'm giving the site a score of 98, because I think Metart is, as I said, the finest softcore glamcore site in the world.
And the support staff is superb. One of the best I've found. They are responsive to any emails asking for help from members, responding within 24 hours usually.
The PU site has a discounted price of $5 for the first month.
Any PU member who has not been a member of the site should grab that bargain.
And PU members who have been previous members of the site should also use that chance to see what new content is available since their last membership.
Like I said, Metart is the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
Metart and its sites accept Visa, Mastercard, Paypal.
I've been a member of Metart and some of its other sites for over 10 years now.
I've had few problems with my subs.
Never a billing problem.
Very rarely a problem with my password not working. Because they want you to use a single login for all your sites under the Metart network.
I think all my subs from Metart are/were from CCBill or Rocketgate.
I've never had any problems with those billers, that I can recall.
You didn't list what the biller is that Metart wants you to use. Perhaps if you showed it, I might (or might not) recognize it.
But if there is a billing problem, Metart is normally more than willing to fix it.
I've seen instances on PU (not a lot, but several) where Metart support staff cancelled overpayments to a PU member, or cancelled a sub with no charge.
So Metart support staff is friendly and easy to work with.
I used to think the Metart support staff email was one of the best around. But then I found Gamma support staff, which has a live chat, which is easier and faster than email. So I dropped Metart support staff to 2nd place.
I've seen an ad for Metart for $5 for the first month. Metart is probably the premier softcore photo site on the internet.
1000s of lovely models, first rate photography, a huge collection of photosets going back to around 1999.
If you've never been a member, or if you haven't joined recently, this is a fine chance to join for the lowest price of the year, to see these girls.
I believe that the sub includes unlimited downloading, but you have to check that out, since I'm a member already, and can't view the offer (I hit the offer link, and am automatically logged into the site, without being able to view the offer details).
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Probably the finest softcore photo site on the internet.
-The largest softcore photo site on the internet. See the bottom line section for the site statistics on the number of photo sets, the number of videos, the number of models, the number of contributing photograpers.
-Updates daily with 4 new items (photo set + video), except on the first of each month, when there are 6 new items.
-Photo sets are offered in a zip file of low, medium and high definition.
-Videos are offered in 270p through 4Kp for the last several years. Before that, the maximum definition offered was 1080p.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-Navigation is basically simple. Good search engine, tags for photo sets and videos. I mainly use the search engine to search for a particular model's content.
Cons:
The cons are basically minor.
-Years ago they had a simple way to list the contents by year and month. They still have a listing for year and month, but it takes more clicks to use it.
-I don't know why, but I find many softcore photo sets can be erotic. But it's much harder for a softcore video to be erotic. Many of the videos at MetArt are boring, in spite of how lovely the model can be, in spite of the model exposing her naked flesh.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-MetArt is a huge site. It can be overwhelming when you browse through the massive amount of photo sets and videos. It's a psychological effect, but it's easy to devalue the photo sets of these beautiful models because you have access to thousands of these sets.
-Most models range in age from 18 to about 30. Most models are white. Most models are slender to medium build. If these model characteristics fit what you're looking for, you're in luck. But some people want greater diversity.
Bottom Line:
MetArt is a softcore site. Don't join expecting hardcore content, you will be disappointed.
It features a collection of thousands of the most attractive women on the planet.
Site stats:
Films: 1,839
Galleries: 23,019
Models: 3,878
Photographers: 291
MetArt is probably the finest softcore site on the internet. Because of the low price (it's the same price as Femjoy, MPL Studios, and other fine photo sites), the massive amount of content, the easy navigation.
During the holidays, you can often find a special discount of $10 to $15 for the first month.
Which is not the case with Femjoy, MPL Studios, or other good softcore sites that only rarely offer a discounted price. Hegre usually offers $15 for the first month during holidays, but MetArt beats Hegre on amount of content, the update rate, and I prefer MetArt over Hegre for its content. I saw a special offer for a Labor Day discount of $5.00 for the first month for MetArt, which is a great price.
MetArt has excellent customer support. They will normally respond to an email within a few hours, and they make a real effort to solve any customer problems.
If you haven't joined MetArt before, and you enjoy softcore photos, I strongly recommend joining MetArt.
It's the finest softcore site on the internet, in my opinion. The beauty of the models, the massive amount of content, easy navigation, excellent customer support, make this the finest softcore site I've ever joined.
I've tried for over 1 hour to load the MetArt site in my Firefox browser.
All I get is a blank page.
Is the site under construction, maintenance, or under cyber attack?
MetArt will soon offer personal video message from models.
Don't know when it will happen.
But if you're a MetArt member, you can expect personal video messages from their models.
Don't know if that is free, or will cost.
But if the video is delivered in person by the model, that would be great.
Especially if you can choose the models you want.
In my dreams.
LOL.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the premier softcore glamcore sites on the internet.
-The biggest collection of models and photosets on the internet. The site has been around since 1999, and updates with 4 new sets (photosets + an occasional video) daily. On the first of the month, they update with 6 new sets.
-They offer a zip file for each photoset in 3 definitions: low, medium, high.
-They offer a streaming photoplayer to view the photosets, with a time-lag you choose for each photo.
-They offer a cover and also a clean cover (the cover of the photoset without any script) for each photoset or video. Useful for collectors who want a simple reference to the collected content.
-They offer unlimited streaming and downloading. Which is a nice feature, in the period where many sites are starting to charge extra for downloads or have download limits.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-They did a recent site update, and dropped some useful features:
They used to have a listing of all the sets posted for each year, with the years divided by months.
That feature is gone. It was an easy way to browse through the back catalog. Now, I don't know an easy way to browse through the back catalog in a systematic way.
-They used to have a feature where you could mark your favorite models and favorite photosets. That is gone.
-The videos at MetArt used to be boring. In spite of the nudity of pretty or lovely models, the videos had almost zero erotic content. Lately, the videos are showing some erotic content. Although there is no masturbation or sexual activity, the models are now allowed to touch themselves, which is a giant step forward. Almost all the videos are solo girls, but the new videos can be considered slightly erotic.
-The quality of the models has been going down recently. That is a personal opinion.
Bottom Line:
Stats
-Over 3,000 models.
-Over 21,000 photosets
-Almost 300 different contributing photographers
-Number of photos per photoset range from 100 to 170.
This is probably the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
I've been a member of this site, continously, for 7 years now.
Maybe I'm getting crotchety in my old age, but I personally don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I think the level of the model attractiveness has been going down.
I miss the old features, where you could list your favorite models and photosets.
I miss the listing of the site content by year and month, that made searching the content much easier.
The videos are getting slightly more erotic, whereas in years gone by, they were a waste of time and money and talent, because they were almost all boring.
But for variety, I think I should join MPL Studios, or Zemani, or Femjoy, or some other fine glamcore site.
This review is very subjective.
I wrote in an comment on MetArt a few months back, that I didn't like the recent changes at MetArt.
PU member blaine responded, on 10-29-19:
"Completely disagree, I love the new layout, look/feel of the website, I found all the important features still available, just access is more intuitive. Been subscribing to Met and the available network of sites for years, hadn't noticed any drop off in the quality of the models. But just my preference I guess. I still love the site."
Maybe my review is too subjective. But it reflects what I believe.
I don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I'm giving the site a score of 92. A few years back I gave it a 95. However, other PU members can score the site higher than I do, because they seem to appreciate the site more than I do.
But any score of 90 or more indicates an excellent site, on technical merits.
Different people have different points of view.
Normal.
I'm used to the old interface, so it's much easier to navigate.
The model history, as a drop-down item, seems to have disappeared.
And the streaming slide-show seems to have changed. The photos are now much smaller.
As for model attractiveness, I keep reading the MetArt member comments, and my tastes often disagree.
But that's life.
I much prefer the older sets, where I thought the level of model attractiveness was much higher.
Even though MetArt still keeps coming out with some stunning new models every so often.
I've been a member of MetArt for over 10 years, off and on.
Bought a lifetime membership a few years back.
So I want to like and enjoy the site.
But I still prefer the old layout over the new layout.
The update to the MetArt site was supposed to make the site faster and more responsive.
A new interface sometimes takes getting used to.
I can't find the older features that I liked.
So I'm not impressed with the update. It makes it harder for me to use the site, not easier.
In my opinion, the level of attractiveness of the models is going down.
So my enjoyment of the site has dropped.
"Sorry, you have submitted too many search requests in a short period of time. Please try again in a few moments."
That the message I get when searching for models' content.
Guess that MetArt is trying to reduce the load on their servers.
Or maybe trying to reduce their electric bill (joke).
MetArt, you used to be best in class.
What the heck happened to you?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
