In my opinion, the PU staff pay little attention to this site.
They seem to have too many other duties to carefully monitor what happens here.
So I truly doubt that Freddie will weigh in on the merits of your review of this site, unless you send her a personal email requesting a personal review of your review.
And even if you send her a personal email, who knows how much that will result in a staff decision on the merits of your review.
I assume that the review will be approved, because I can't find anything wrong with it. It wasn't written to be a fraudulent review.
Just my opinion, of course.
But Freddie seems to have a laissez-faire approach, which is probably due to the fact that she's not being paid enough to spend a lot of time at the PU site, but has to concentrate on her other duties, I'm assuming.
Which is different from your calm approach.
Different strokes, for different folks, I guess.
I admire your calm approach to life.
Your ability to see opposing viewpoints.
Wishing you well during this holiday season (is Black Friday a season, or should I consider this Thanksgiving? Joke.).
But you should definitely be eligible for the raffle, at least for the Mylfed review.
And in my opinion, this review of Mobile Ruth Blackwell should be eligible as well.
For what it's worth.
Peace, brother PU member.
(My blood seems to boil when I read some of mbaya's and tangub's comments. Grrrrr.)
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Time network.
-The young girls are mainly attractive teens or 20s models. Coco Lovelock, Haley Spades, Athena Faris, Khloe Kapri, Laney Grey, Haley Reed, etc. The older women playing the step-mothers are also attractive: Sofie Marie, Silvia Saige, etc.
-All memberships have unlimited streaming. You can stream videos in 288p through 2160p (4K).
-If you have downloading privileges, you can download the videos in 160p through 2160p (4K).
-Videos have a photoset which is based on the video. There's a zip file for the photoset.
Cons:
-Adult Time has different types of memberships. Many short-term memberships are streaming only. The easiest way to get downloading privileges is with a yearly membership. Except many PU members don't want to get locked into a yearly membership.
-Navigation can be confusing. Two main reasons: a huge amount of content, over 55,000 hardcore videos. Plus, content covering many different niches. So you've got, in the main, lots of content at most sites (hundreds of videos), and hundreds of different sites, and it's hard to get a simple listing for most of the sites. So even though the massive content is a positive, it's also a negative because finding the content that appeals to you can be time-consuming. And not as easy as it would be if they laid out the content into separate sites more logically, that can be searched more easily.
-A common negative is that the models start moaning loudly and screaming loudly to show fake excitement.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Some noises, some moans and groans would add to the excitement, if they are believable, but at Mommy's Girl, it's too fake, and takes away from the scene.
-With so much content, it's easy to start complaining about the quality of the content. That's human nature. Most of the content is good to excellent quality, in technical terms. But people will complain that the content is bland or repetitive or lacking freshness. Personally, I think there's a huge amount of content that I don't appreciate, but there's also a lot of content that I find appealing. Which is a navigation problem.
-A fairer complaint that people have with the site and network is variable download speeds. I don't see a lot of people complaining about streaming issues, but more people complain about download speeds which can vary a lot. Personally, I don't download very much, because I have a slow connection to my ISP, and it's not worth the hassle of wasting my time with downloads. But for people who want fast downloads, that is a valid issue, but they will have to live with what they get. There's no question but that Adult Time is a very popular network, and lots of people are streaming and downloading, which puts a strain on their servers.
-There's a model's page, but it only has links to the model's videos. No personal information.
-There's a 300 GB daily limit. Which seems huge to me, and should not be a problem for anyone who is not trying to download the entire network in a short time period.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Part of the Adult Time network. Adult Time advertises itself as the only porn site you'll ever need. I don't know how true that is, because I belong to many different porn sites, and I think many of them are worth joining.
However, if you are on a very limited budget, the Adult Time network gives you a tremendous amount of hardcore porn, covering many different niches.
Mommy's Girl features lesbian porn.
Specifically, old-young porn. Where a step-mother and her step-daughter are having sex. So it's part of the fake incest niche (or what I consider fake incest, which is sex between step-relatives, instead of real incest which would be sex between blood relatives).
-This is story-driven porn. The plots are supposed to be important. So the models get to demonstrate their acting chops. Except that many of these models can't act, and the plots and dialog are sophomoric, so you either turn off your brain, and try to focus on the physical attractiveness of the models, or ignore the plots and poor acting, and again, focus on the physical attractiveness of the models.
Adult Time network has other sites that either focus on lesbian action or feature lesbian action. Web Young, Girlsway, Girlfriends Films, Adam And Eve Pictures, 1111 Customs, Addicted2Girls, Teenage Lesbian, Sweetheart Video, etc.
With so many different sites featuring lesbian action, you should be able to find a lot of content that appeals to you, if you're into lesbian porn. At some Adult Time sites the plots are more believable, or the acting or sex is better.
I think that Mommy's Girl is a good addition to the Adult Time network.
The site gives you good lesbian porn with a plot.
The plots are often foolish.
The acting is not very good.
But the models are attractive.
And the technical qualities are good (good camera work, good lighting, nice sets, good sound control--except they moan and scream too much and too loud).
And you get access to the Adult Time network, which raises the score to 90.
Even if the Mommy's Girl site was poor, and it's not, access to the Adult Time network is worth 90 points by itself.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A site in the Nubiles Porn network. Join any one of the network sites, you get access to all the sites. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The technical qualities of the videos are excellent: professional videography (excellent focus on the models, crystal clear images, strong lighting, good sound control, nice sets,
-There are holiday discounts throughout the year for lowered membership prices. You can often join for $84/year, or $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $14.95/month.
-Navigation is easy. The site (and network) is laid out simply. You can easily switch between sites, or within the same site.
-Login is easy, if you have cookies enabled. Login details are then stored, and you just click to enter the site.
-Login and member pages are secure (https), which helps to keep your login details hidden, and your net history private.
-The site theme is step-mothers having sex with their step-sons, which is naughty incest. And the step-daughters are often
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
involved, which makes the sex even more of a family affair. So this hits the incest, young-old (step-son with step-mother), young-young (step-brother with step-sister), buttons.
-There is a text summary of the plot of each video, which describes the plot accurately. And the category listing can be used to search for videos that fit your niche.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Ads on every page. Again, standard for porn sites. The first page you see when logging in a page with ads for other sites, that you pass through to get to the members area. And there are ads for other sites on every members page.
-The plots for the videos are paper thin. Think of the plots as parodies, or really stupid plots. And the acting by the models is truly amateur-hour. Think of it as the models having fun saying trite lines with a smile and inviting you to giggle along with them, while enjoying the nudity and sex on display.
Bottom Line:
I'm not a fan of parody style porn. I don't enjoy the stupid plots, or the models acting like brainless sluts. The parody style is very popular, but I don't enjoy it.
If you do like parody style porn, this site gives you 177 videos with matching photosets. You also get a screen cap photoset for each video, which I think it overkill. Who needs a screen cap photoset, when you can view or collect a real photograph photoset of the same video?
The site started around October 2013, and it's still updating today with 1 or 2 or 3 new videos per month.
The young models are often attractive.
The older models often have breast implants.
The oldest videos are available in 270p through 1080p definition for streaming and downloads.
Newer videos starting a few years back offer a 4K definition.
The main plot theme is horny stepmothers teaching their naive, often backwards stepsons and stepdaughers how to satisfy their sex urges.
With age comes wisdom, and these MILF stepmothers are more than willing to teach their relatives the joys of sex.
The sex is basically bread and butter, not over the top: but you get blowjobs, handjobs, girl-boy, girl-girl, titty fuck, etc. etc. Almost no anal sex, that I could find.
I'm giving the site a score of 81. If you're into parody style porn, you would rate it higher.
But there are other sites in the network I enjoy more.
The nubiles.net site, which is included in network membership, is like an encyclopedia of young porn stars early in their careers, with around 4 videos and photosets of each model featured, and the nubiles.net site has thousands of attractive young porn stars.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU shows a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring.
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 17 different sites.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading privileges for the videos and photo sets.
-The technical features of the videos and photo sets are excellent: clear, crisp images, good to excellent flesh-tones of the models, nice sets, good lighting, good focus.
-There is a photo set for each video.
-Videos and photo sets come in your choice of multiple definitions.
-Site navigation is easy.
-Multiple tags and a text description describe the plot of each scene.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-The poor acting level of the models, the stupid scripts and dialogue are strong negatives that negate the technical qualities of the videos.
-The level of attractiveness of the models (both the teens and MILFs) is below average for the network.
Princess Cum, Nubiles Casting, Petite HD Porn, Petite Ballerinas Fucked, Nubiles.net, all have teen models that are far more attractive.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Advertising for competing sites and for the Nubiles Porn network take up a good part of the real estate of every member page. The good thing about the advertising for the Nubiles Porn network is that each hot link serves as a link to open that particular site.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 147
Runtimes: most videos run from 20 to 40 minutes.
All videos available in definition from 270p through 1080p.
Newer videos starting Oct 18, 2020 have a 4K option.
Photo sets have from 28 to 200 photos per set.
Site theme: Faux incest: a step-mother has sex, either with her step-daughter, or her step-son, or with her step-child and her step-child's sex partner.
So there's some old-young appeal, teen niche, milf niche, lesbian element. Because you have women in their 30s and 40s, you have a wider selection of body types beyond the slender teenagers.
The site falls into the reality porn niche, except when I watch these videos, they seem fake as hell. That's because of the poor acting abilities of the models and the stunt cocks, and the poor scripts, which are unbelievable.
=========
Edit:
I am confused about faux incest. I've read on the internet that laws regarding incest vary considerably between jurisdictions.
In many areas, legally, there is no difference between an adopted child and a biological child for incest.
To make that clear, an adopted child cannot marry the daughter or son of his adoptive parents, because the effect of the adoption order is to create a blood relationship between them.
I don't know why so many sites show fake incest (what I call fake incest, which is sex between step-relatives).
Most sites make it very clear there is no blood relation between the sex partners, but there is a step-relation between the sex partners.
So even though these are actors, not real blood relations and not real step-relatives, the sex between step-relatives would be illegal.
So what's the point of making it clear that the actors are playing step-relatives instead of blood relatives?
Since, legally, a step-relative is a blood relative?
In some jurisdictions, adopted siblings who are related by adoption only, but not by blood, can marry.
But that interpretation seems to be very limited.
=========
The main strengths of the site:
-You get access to all 17 sites of the Nubiles Porn network.
-The videos are professionally shot: Clear, crisp imagery, good lighting, nice sets, nice sound control.
-Easy site navigation.
-Easy to switch to a different site in the network.
-Relatively low membership price: $14.98/month with a PU discount.
The main cons of the site:
-The stupid plots. The poor acting.
-I don't find the models very attractive. Other sites in the network have more attractive models.
-I definitely enjoy many other sites in the network far more than I enjoy this site.
This is a personal opinion: I don't enjoy the site.
The Nubiles.net site (part of this network) is the main value of the network.
That site serves as an encyclopedia of teen porn starlets who are starting out in their careers.
There are other sites in the network that are worth viewing.
If Milf-teen incest porn is your fantasy, the site might be more pleasing for you.
Here are the sorted site names of Nubiles-Porn network:
BadTeensPunished
BountyHunterPorn
Daddys lil Angel
Detention Girls DriverXXX MomsTeachSex
My Family Pies
Nubiles-Casting
Nubiles-Porn Nubiles.net
NubilesET
NubilesUnscripted
PetiteBallerinasFucked PetiteHDPorn
PrincessCum
StepSiblingsCaught
TeacherFucksTeens
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discounted price of $19.98/month instead of the regular price of $29.95/month.
-Moms Teach Sex is part of the Nubiles Porn network. So you get access to all the Nubiles Porn network sites, which is 17 different sites.
-The network sites are listed in the first reply to this review.
-The site (Moms Teach Sex) features exclusive videos.
-The photo sets can be downloaded in large, medium or small definition. The recent sizes are:
Large 5760x3840px
Medium 2000x1333px
Small 1200x800px
The videos can be downloaded in 270 - 1080 p, for all the videos, even the ones posted in 2013.
The videos can be streamed online in 270 - 1080 p, for all the videos, even the ones posted in 2013.
-The videos are professionally shot, but the matching photo sets are a waste of time. I assume the photo sets were generated by a computer program from the video, because the composition of many of the photos is poor.
-No download limit.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale. But this is standard for porn sites.
-Slow update rate. Currently 2 new videos per month.
-Small site. 106 videos. Plus the matching photo sets, plus
-Not much effort was put into choosing the step-mother and the young female for their looks. They aren't gorgeous or pretty, but average-looking. Personally, I like pretty young girls, or very attractive older women, and none of these models would win any beauty pageants.
But maybe that is a positive, because it adds an element of reality to the videos: you can't always expect the young female or the mother to be attractive.
Except that in these cases, don't expect either the young woman or the older woman to be attractive.
They are pieces of meat that might satisfy a male in heat.
Actually, there are a few younger female models that could be attractive, but no effort is made to make them attractive.
For example, Kyler Quinn can be very attractive. But in the video titled "How To Fuck Your Mom - S11:E5",
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
it's like they actually made an effort to tone down her appeal, to make her plain-looking.
I don't understand the reason to make a young female model less attractive in a sex video or photo set.
Maybe they are trying to inject an element of reality-porn, where attractive models like Katie Kush, in "Special Delivery - S10:E8", are less attractive, so they are happy to have sex without any lead-in or setup, and accept the step-mother teaching how to jack a guy off.
Whatever.
I would prefer the site to make the models as attractive as possible, instead of as plain as possible.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): MomsTeachSex gives exclusive videos showing that a mother's love can know no bounds. Here is proof that when a mother thinks that her daughter (or stepdaughter) does not know how to satisfy her daughter's boyfriend, the mother is willing to make the ultimate sacrifice, and teach the daughter how to arouse and satisfy the young man. What greater love can there be, beyond a mother and daughter having sex with a young stud?
If you enjoy threesomes, or MILFs having sex with their daughter and the daughter's boyfriend, then this site hits that niche.
There are also examples of a mother teaching her step son how to enjoy sex with a young woman.
So, there is fake incest (step mother with step son or step daugher), MILF (the step mother), lesbian activity (the step mother with the young step daughter or the step son's female partner).
Whatever niche turns you on.
This is a small site (106 videos currently) with a slow update rate that is currently 2 new videos per month.
The site started late 2013.
So, with a slow update rate, it will only grow very slowly.
However, you get access to the entire Nubiles Porn network, which means you have access to a large amount of porn videos and photo sets.
I'm not sure why the site offers both a matching photo set and a matching screen shot set.
The quality of the photo set is not great.
That is a very subjective opinion.
However, if you study a photo set, you will find that, although the photos are focused, the photos were probably made from the video with a computer program: I doubt the photos were shot with a camera by a professional photographer, because too many of the composed shots are just plain lousy.
So, if the photo sets are poor, why bother with a screen shot set?
It makes no sense.
I don't think the photo sets are worth collecting.
And the screen shots are even less worth collecting.
The screen shots are just a waste of bandwith, a waste of site space.
Since I prefer pretty or attractive models, this site has little interest for me.
However, as I said, if you are into MILFs, or fantasize about a step-mother in a three-some with her step-daughter or step-son, then the site might appeal to you.
There can also be some lesbian action between the step-mom and the younger woman.
I'm giving the site a score of 79.
The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, the sets are not glamorous but not the cheapest, the audio is good.
But the photo sets are poor. Poor composition, and the models are not made to look attractive.
OK, I finally get it. The videos and photo sets are supposed to be a slice of reality. This is supposed to be reality porn: that's why the models are made to look plain, like ordinary people, instead of like attractive models.
And it also explains why the camera gives weird point-of-view sequences, where you, the porn viewer, are supposed to be a fly-on-the wall, so you see the action unfolding from a distance, from looking down, from other viewpoints instead of the regular porn videos you normally watch.
Except I'm more used to the regular, normal way of viewing a porn video.
I'm giving the site a score of 79.
That's because:
-the site is small, with a slow update rate.
-the models are made to look plain, instead of trying to make them attractive.
And many or most of the models are plain, to begin with.
-There are other sites in the network that present their models more attractively, that also feature the fake-incest theme, and can also have a bit of old-young theme.
Read the first reply to see listing of sites included in the Nubiles-Porn network:
Impressive review.
It's nice to see a person's real thoughts instead of a review that follows a formula ticking off the points to be followed in a review.
And in this case, not a lot of points need to be followed.
The Mormon Girlz site membership is a waste of money, due to lack of content.
It's a mystery why they messed up a good site by dumping their content.
Maybe it's related to the sale of the site to Team Skeet?
They might be holding onto the deleted videos/photosets and trying to sell them elsewhere?
Whatever.
The site as it exists is a grab for money.
Thanks for the review, which is a fine warning to anyone who reads it.
The problem is that their software team has problems updating the site software.
That's why any problems at the site that are software related can't be fixed, usually.
For example, all users are now newbies. The site software no longer recognizes how many reviews a user has written, to change their status from newbie to "whatever the term was for a higher level".
And for years, it now takes 1 year before you can do a re-review of a site, even though the rules say a site can be re-reviewed after 6 months.
I think the site software was written in a computer language that the current software team does not understand, so making changes to the software is difficult.
Excellent review.
Covers an excellent site very nicely.
I always liked MPL Studios a lot, but haven't joined them for a long time, because there are too many other sites taking my time and money.
But I agree the MPL Studio models are almost uniformly gorgeous, and beautifully photographed.
Also agree that Metart is not as exciting as it used to be. But it still is the biggest softcore photosite on the internet, with a huge backlog of very attractive models.
But I agree that some Metart photographers like to twist their models into pretzels, so you can examine their pussies and anus more closely. Which doesn't appeal to me.
LOL.
I can't believe this is your first review. You've been a member since the dinosaurs were roaming.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low priced membership. Can often find a first month membership for $5.
Lifetime memberships are sometimes offered for $100 during the year.
-Mr Skin is probably the easiest, best site for looking up brief sex scenes of your favorite movie stars and celebrities.
-They list lots of discounted memberships to other porn sites.
-Downloading and streaming is included in the membership. You don't have to pay extra for downloads.
-Clips are available in 360p through 1080p.
-You can play clips in .25 through 1.5 speed. Seems like a gimmick to me, except you can slow down the speed to watch "good parts" more slowly.
-Search is excellent. You can search by name, or title of the movie or tv show.
Cons:
-Clips are mainly short, 3 minutes or less.
-The quality of the clips is just OK, not really excellent. Which is surprising, since they take the clips from commercial movies and tv shows.
Bottom Line:
The site advertisies:
300,000+ pictures and videos
20,000+ sexy celebrities
30,000+ movies and TV shows
New updates daily
Detailed reviews and ratings
They frequently advertise a first month's price of $5, rebilling at $20/month.
Or a yearly price of $60/year.
They also advertise a special price of $100 for a lifetime membership every once in a while.
I joined the site for $100 for a lifetime membership.
Which is fine, except that I rarely use the site.
I think a better idea is to join for $5 for one month, explore the site, and see if it's worth joining for a longer period.
If you think it's worth joining for a longer period, wait for the $100 lifetime offer.
That makes more sense than joining for $60 for a year, even though that is a cheap price.
The positives about the site:
It might satisfy the itch if you want to see scraps about the celebrites/movie stars who have done nudity in movies.
I say "scraps", because most of the scenes are very brief, a few minutes or less. So you might see some nudity, but the scenes at Mr Skin lack most of the impact that the scenes from the movies have.
Their motto is: Fast-forwarding to the good parts, since 1999!
That's good, which is what most guys (and girls) want to see.
Except that, the good parts lack the impact and value without the buildup that gives the scene meaning.
And the quality of the videos can often be lacking.
Which I don't understand.
If you're going to copy from a commercial movie, shouldn't the quality be excellent?
But the clips often disappoint, in how brief they are (3 minutes or less average run-time), and the quality of the images can be poor.
Having said that, it's still worthwhile to explore the site, to see for yourself what the site offers.
For a very low price, you can re-visit briefly some of the scenes from memorable movies that you saw years ago, and stuck in your memory for years afterward. Personally, I've found that tastes can change over the years. But there are some instances where the scenes are good, but not as great as they should be.
For example:
The scenes from Fast Times at Ridgemont High with Phoebe Cates and Jennifer Jason Leigh are classic.
Both girls are lovely.
And the scenes are good, but not as great as they should have been.
You can watch those scenes in definition from 360p through 1080p, but it doesn't seem like 1080p when you're watching them.
The images are definitely not as crisp as 1080p images should look like.
And maybe the colors aren't as vivid as they should be.
So the site best serves to satisify your curiousity about some movie stars. But the clips lack the power that the source movies have.
They advertise detailed reviews and ratings. I've been a member of the site for serveral years now (I bought a lifetime membership years ago for $100), and the only reviews I've read at the site are very brief snippets of reviews.
I don't spend a lot of time at the site, so I don't know where they are hiding the "detailed" reviews..
Expectations:
Don't join the site expecting to see a lot of hot clips of nudity or sex.
Instead, the site serves mainly to satisfy some of your curiosity about semi-nudity or nudity of movie actors (and other celebrities).
I should add that I'm no longer blocked.
The block was removed automatically, after a few days.
No reason why I was blocked, but it can happen.
Happy I can access the site.
I have a lifetime membership, that I bought for around $100 years ago.
So I visit the site every so often.
I didn't take your reply as an accusation, or anything negative.
I took it as indication you were interested in possible problems about a listed site. So your first reply was completely positive, in my eyes.
I don't know why, but sometimes I can post a reply, and people can see negative elements, even when I have no negative intent.
Maybe I should cover any posts with lots of smiley icons.
But that would be overdoing it.
When I try to load the Mr Skin site, I get a popup page that says:
Mr Skin
Sorry, you have been blocked.
This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. You performed an action that triggered the service and blocked your request.
--------
Not sure how to access the site.
I assume the block is temporary, but I don't know what, if anything, I did to trigger the block.
Using the Mr Skin link from PU also leads to the block.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main pro is that the site serves as an encyclopedia of nude appearance by movie stars in movies.
An easy way to check if a movie star appeared nude or semi-nude in movies. More suitable for fans of movie stars, instead of fans of erotic content.
-Unlimited downloading and streaming.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-The introductory page after login is a page of ads. Normally, I don't consider ads a positive, but there are only a few ads for major sites, and some of the membership prices are very low: MetArt, for example, has a $60 annual membership listed, which is the lowest price I've seen for that site.
-The clips usually end with a "SkinVision" segment, where they replay the "sexy part of the clip" in slow motion, so you can re-watch the "best part of the clip".
-A low membership price: $60/year. They often offer a lifetime membership for $100.
-Excellent search engine.
Cons:
-The tags describing a clip can be misleading:
A tag says breasts, but the model/actress can be wearing a bikini or a blouse, and the breasts are not naked, but covered by material. You figure she has breasts, because she is female, but you can't see them.
Or the tags say ass, and the model has an ass, but it's covered by a bikini bottom or shorts.
-The clips are not erotic. They are too short to be erotic. Even when the clip is from the erotic part of a movie, you lose the impact of the movie because the build-up to the clip is missing, and the clip itself lacks the original meaning of the scene. And when I say the clip is too short to be erotic, you have a clip of two minutes or less, so it's like a fleeting glance, instead of a full-blown experience.
An erotic photo or photo set can, and usually is, a more complete and satisfying experience instead of the Mr Skin short movie clips.
-The quality of the clips is disappointing. The clips from movies are degraded definition.
Bottom Line:
The site is for fans who want to search for brief clips of movie stars nudity.
The clips are not erotic. They are mainly short clips, 2 minutes or less, with minimal build-up.
As an encyclopedia of movie star nudity, it serves a useful function.
But I feel Mr Skin is built for fans of movie star nudity, and not for fans of erotic content.
If you want erotic content, go for a fine photo site, like MPL Studios or MetArt or other softcore glam sites.
Or if you're into hardcore teens, the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites, X-Art, Teen Mega World offer a lot of value.
Or a hardcore glamcore network like LetsDoeIt is a fine choice.
Even though Mr Skin is catalogued as an erotic site, since it focuses on nudity in movies, it is not a site to go to for erotic content. Instead, you go to the site if you have an itch to see if a favorite movie star has done any public (movie, tv) nudity.
There's a reply from PU member marcdc1 on 2019-04-25 that sums up the site:
"I keep checking out Mr. Skin and so far haven't pulled the trigger - mostly because I fear it's going to feed my curiosity - but not my libido".
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
It's a good site for what it does: There's a huge amount of short clips, many of them non-nude. As an encyclopedia of movie star near-nudity or nudity, it does a good job.
I just wish the quality of the clips was better, the clips were longer to include a build-up to the scene to give it greater impact.
As a site of erotic content, it's disappointing.
Got an email from Mr. Skin yesterday.
Email advertises free lifetime membership to LickHer.com, a teen lesbian site.
Click on the hot link in the email, and page opens at LickHer.com, with thumbnails of cute teen lesbians.
Click on the hot link on the page to join, it asks for your email and password on a new page.
Fill in your email and password, hit the enter button, and a new page pops up, asking for your credit card details, your real name.
Turns out the free is a free 2-day trial, that renews at $39.95.
ADDITIONAL OFFER DETAILS:
(**) Your free 2 day trial to LickHer renews at the same calendar day at a fixed $39.95 after the trial ends unless cancelled. To avoid being charged, simply cancel your membership before the trial period ends.
Any charges made to your card will appear under 'biluhard.com'.
So the offer of a free lifetime membership to the site seems misleading.
18 Videos has around 20 sites in the network.
You join any one, you should get access to all 20.
Most of the sites stopped updating years ago.
But some still update.
Many of the sites use the home- (or amateur) style of shooting porn.
There are some hot (good) videos at the network, if you don't mind searching for the stuff that doesn't appeal to you.
Look for a price of $60 for the year. That's the price I paid, and it's offered different times during the year.
Otherwise, you can pay a high price, while there are cheaper prices available.
I joined through 18Videoz, which usually offers the $60/year price.
But like I say, I've seen higher prices for shorter-term membership.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Small site. 25 videos. Why is that a positive? Because the videos are crap, you can see this right off from the first video to the last video. So it doesn't take a long time to realize the site is crap.
-The models at the site are Markus and Nicky. They are in all the videos. Two below-average people in looks (Markus is a plain guy, Nicky is an unappealing girl). How is that positive? Because you quickly realize that you will either find the videos appealing or not, because this is home-style porn that you either like or dislike. Not a lot of variety in the style.
-One thing that is positive is the text description of the videos: it's short, direct, and covers the plot of the video:
Examples:
"When me and Nicky got to the bath together and I touched her wet body my cock became so hard that I couldn't stand any second and not to put it in her. I even shot it on camera to remind that horny moment sometimes."
Cons:
-Joining the site directly is expensive: $29.95/month.
There are often sales that offer $14.95/month if you join the network directly, or $60/year.
Except there are better networks around that are more expensive, but offer better quality content.
-This is an archive site. The site has has 25 videos. That was the count in 2008, that is the count in 2020.
-Resetting your password is easy, if you get locked out. However, there is a captcha that is difficult to solve, and usually takes a few tries to get correct.
-Login and member pages are not secure. Your browser will probably have a popup that states the login and member pages are not secure and prone to hacking.
-Username and password are computer-generated. Can't choose your own.
Bottom Line:
The site advertises the content is 100% homemade. This is plus and minus: Plus, that you know it's probably true, because the videos are so cheaply made: cheap sets, jerky filming technique, poor lighting, a stunt cock and the girlfriend model that are, to put it kindly, below-average-in-looks.
That's the plus side.
The minus side: I look at two of the videos at the site, and that's more than enough for me.
Why would I waste my time on this crap?
Why?
Because I want to post a review to qualify for one of the raffle prizes.
That's the only reason I'm writing a review on this throw-away porn site.
The site advertising or site description is false.
Maybe I'm being harsh.
The site says the stunt cock is 23 years old, the model is 19.
That might have been true in 2008, when the site was launched, but it's now 2020, 12 years later, so the models must be slightly older today.
However, the site contents were probably shot in 2008, and have never been updated.
So, in that sense, the models were 23 and 19 when the videos were made.
The site states the model is sexy and gorgeous.
Maybe she's sexy. But gorgeous? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: To me, this is one fug ugly girl.
Porn and life is a learning experience.
I'm still learning that people can believe wildly separate things about the same object.
To call this model gorgeous is to claim that Donald Trump, our beloved president, is the kindest, most caring person in the world.
And Trump is also the most honest person in the world.
Earth shaking ideas that rattle my brain.
The videos have a posting date of 2013. That is probably a lie.
They were probably first posted around 2008, when the site was first launched. And then the posting date for the videos was changed to 2013, to make it appear that the site was updating, even though there were no updates. Some sites change the posting dates of their content to try to fool the casual viewer that the site is updating.
The site had 25 videos in 2008.
The site has 25 videos in 2020.
I can't swear the 2020 videos are the original 2008 videos, but I strongly suspect that they are the original videos.
I would give the site a score of 55.
That's being generous.
The site advertises homemade-style videos. That is true. The sets (I call them sets, but they used whatever was available: a cheap apartment, sex in a car at a park, and lots more videos at the cheap apartment in the living room, the bathroom, the bedroom.
On the positive side: with membership to this site you get access to the entire network of about 20 sites. Almost all the sites are going for the homestyle vibe. Many of the sites are throw-away sites that no longer update. There are a number of cute models, and maybe you can find some videos worth watching. But I would rather spend more money and find a network with better quality content that I can enjoy more.
The network is surprisingly large, with 3,258 videos, around 20 sites.
Mostly the sites go for a home-based amateur style of shooting: cheap sets, teen-based porn that requires little scripting, not a lot of care put into making the models or videos look good.
The vibe is home-based videos. Except a lot of the girls are cute, and the videos could be so much better if they changed their style to make the girls more attractive, to upgrade the videos with better lighting and equipment.
Actually, that is what the network has been doing with a few of the sites that still update: they are changing the video approach from home-style to more mainstream style: better lighting, better sets, that present the models more attractively. So if you joined the network, and have the time, there are videos that are worth watching.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Part of the Nubiles Porn network. The Nubiles Porn network is a fine network where you get professionally shot videos and photosets of good quality.
-Streaming and downloads are unlimited. You don't have to pay extra for downloads.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring. $99.95/year recurring.
But you can find a yearly price of $84/year recurring during holiday specials.
The site is currently offering the $84/year special price.
-The main billers are CCBill and Epoch. Both are easy to deal with, easy to cancel your sub.
-Sign in is easy, if you have cookies enable. Just click the login hot link (since your login details are saved by the computer), and you are logged in.
-Navigation is basically simple. Once you get to the main home area, you have a menu of the different sites you have access to.
-Site is still updating. There were 4 updates per month from Nov 2021 thru Feb 2022. Then 3 updates per month for Mar and Apr 2022. Two updates in May 2022.
Cons:
-The main con is the stupid plots, the poor acting of the models. I suggest turning off the sound, and watching the videos in silent mode. Then you can focus on how cute or attractive the models are physically, and ignore the acting and plot.
I realize the stupid plots and poor acting are supposed to be cute or funny, but I just think it's stupid. And a waste of attractive models, who could be in much better scenes.
-Apart from the stupid plots and poor acting, the other cons are minor.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Ads on every member page. The first page on logging in is a page full of ads, with no video or photoset content. Then you move to the members area with a member content menu for the different sites.
Bottom Line:
-Site theme is faux incest: sex between step-relations. This is a popular niche that many sites are covering in the last few years. Porn sites are always searching for the next big thing that will draw subscribers, but faux incest is an over-used gimmick that holds little interest for me: Good porn, or watchable porn, needs a few basic factors:
-Nice, crisp visuals. To see what the action is like, what the models look like.
-Good colors for the skin tones. Plus attractive models.
-Decent sets.
-Some plot would be nice to add meaning to the sex.
Sex between step-relations is mainly between step-brother and step sister.
But you can also see step-father and step-daughter.
Less common is step-mother and step-son.
Or step-mother and step-daughter (lesbian old-young sex).
Male gay porn (male-male) is far less common than boy-girl or girl-girl porn. I don't think there is any male gay porn at the MyFamilyPies site.
For me, the stupid plots and poor acting get in the way of enjoying the videos.
I don't buy the bubble-headed cute teens who are giggling and laughing until they start having sex with each other.
I get far more enjoyment watching the videos at the Wow network sites, or the Teen Mega World network, or any video where the models are not supposed to be brainless idiots in attractive bodies.
But that's just me. Someone has to be enjoying these videos, or they would stop making them.
The site deserves a score of 83. Because the videos are professionally shot. Attractive models. Clear, crisp visuals, good lighting and colors, nice sets. Easy site navigation. Site is still updating. A lot of site features that make using the site easy to stream and download, in your choice of definition.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-MyFamilyPies is part of the Nubiles Porn network. The Nubiles Porn network is a fine network, where, in the main, the videos are crisp and clear, and well lighted. What a change from the Bang My Teen Ass site, the last site I reviewed, where the videos were washed out and the naturally attractive teen models were blah. At My Family Pies, you get crisp images of how lovely some of these models are.
Chloe Cherry, Haley Reed, Katie Kush, Kyler Quinn,Lady D, Stacy Cruz, Tiffany Tatum, and Zazie are just some of the cute models featured at the site.
-Video definition runs from 270p through 1080p for most videos.
They started offering 4K video definition for new videos at the site in October 2020, so the 4K option is definitely in the minority.
-PU has a special discount:
monthly: $14.98
yearly: $99.95
Sometimes you can find a yearly membership at $84.
-Content is exclusive.
-Navigation is easy.
-Excellent search engine.
-121+ photos per photoset.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
You also get a photoset of the same scene with screencaps. The sceencap photosets have a condensed number of screencaps, maybe 43. The idea of the screencap photoset is to save storage space, I guess. I think the photo photosets, if the model is really cute, are the better choice to collect. The images of the photos versus the screencaps are much crisper and better focused.
-They don't have a trailer for the videos, but the tags show you what the action will be in the video. Or you can play a slideshow of the photoset as a preview.
-There is a model listing for each site that can be arranged alphabetically, by posting date, or by rating. The model listing is nice-sized thumbnails that give you a good idea of what the model looks like.
CONS(START OF):
-The major con is how thin and stupid the plots are. And the acting is amateur.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-If you can ignore the stupid plots and lame acting (which is hard to do), many of the models are attractive young teens, and the sex can be OK.
-The models and stunt cocks speak English in the videos, but with an accent. I assume they are from Eastern Europe originally. I would prefer subtitles instead. I know many people don't like reading subtitles when watching a movie or video, but I don't mind. But the strange accents are irritating for me. (Maybe I need to start taking tranquilizers when I watch my porn?)
-Irregular update rate. You might get 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 new videos in a month.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: In today's world, divorce is common. So when divorced people remarry, they often make a blended family, with children from each parent.
This site shows that the blended step-children can have sex with each other (which I call fake incest, since the videos make clear there is no real incest by blood relations), and the step-children can also have sex with their step-parents.
So the taboo factor is supposed to make the sex hotter.
Fake incest, also some young-old sex when the step parents have sex with the step children.
I much prefer the Pure Taboo site (part of the Adult Time network) for the story-driven plots of taboos, which has cinematic quality videos, and excellent acting by the models).
Pure Taboo is a much finer site, but the MyFamilyPies does feature some cute models, and if you can ignore or accept the stupid plots and poor acting, the sex can be watchable. Or the sex can be boring.
What I like about the site is the sets are nice, the lighting is excellent, some of the models are cute. The site is well organized, is easy to navigate, and there are plenty of technical features to stream or download the videos and photosets.
But the stupid plots and the poor acting ruin the videos.
Maybe you could ignore the videos, which should be the main draw of the site, and slideshow the photosets. This would erase the stupid dialog, the stupid plot, the poor acting. And you could create your own plot to explain the slideshow. Except it would take a genius to create an intelligent plot for the slideshow. Because the female models and the stunt cocks usually act like morons, and the slideshows (even without dialogue) show this clearly.
I know I'm being harsh. I just can't get past the stupid plots and poor acting.
I suspect the models are trying for a comedic effect, because the plots make very little sense, but I would prefer the Teen Mega World style, or the Wow Porn style, of straight sex, with a little plot thrown in, but good hardcore sex. And the stupid plots at MyFamilyPies get in the way of any enjoyment of the sex.
This is a listing of the sites included in Nubiles-Porn network:
Bad Teens Punished
Bounty Hunter Porn
Daddys Lil Angel
Detention Girls DriverXXX Moms Teach Sex
My Family Pies Nubiles Casting
Nubiles Unscripted
NubilesET Petite HD Porn
Princess Cum Step Siblings Caught
Teacher Fucks Teens
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-My Family Pies is part of the Nubiles Porn network. So you get access to about 14 sites in the network.
-See the reply section for a listing of the current sites in the network.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month.
-The site is for fans of fake incest (where step-relatives have sex with each other. Fake incest, because there is no blood relationship between the parties, so it's not really illegal, but the mind is supposed to feel thrills because there is a forbidden element to the sex).
-Even though this is fake incest, a lot of the models are attractive females, and the sex can be hot.
-The videos are professionally shot: crisp, clear images, good framing, good lighting.
-CCBill is the primary biller. A trusted name, easy to cancel, easy to contact if there are any problems. However, the customer support team also seems easy to contact if there are any problems.
-The webmaster seems to respond to any problems reported about the site at the PU site.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can stream or download the videos in your choice of definition: 270p-1080p.
-No streaming or downloading limits.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Small site. Only 52 videos currently.
-Slow update rate. Usually 2 or 3 new videos added per month.
-One minor problem is the site names get confusing: You have Nubiles-Porn, Nubiles Casting, Nubiles Unscripted, NubilesET which are all included in the Nubiles-Porn network.
However, the Nubile Films is a stand-alone site, run by the same people that run Nubiles-Porn, but Nubile Films requires a separate membership.
Bottom Line:
Warning: The best way to enjoy the site is to turn off your brain. Or, maybe, to pretend you are taking a psychedelic journey where the images and action are happening in a fantasy land.
Do not let logic or critical thinking impede the story or action, or your enjoyment will drop considerably.
The site niche can be considered fake incest. Since there is also some sex between step father and step daughter, or step mother and step son, or step mother and step daughter, it can also have an element of old-young, although old-young niche usually has a teen girl having sex with a much older man, one old enough to be her grandfather instead of her father.
This is a small site. Currently only has 52 videos, plus matching photo sets.
The site was launched in December 2017.
A slow update rate kept the content small. There are 2 or 3 new videos per month, and that's more or less the rate since starting.
The site shows that even in the times of unrest caused by President Donald Trump, there is hope for America. Which is a wonderful thing. When adults with children marry other adults with children, creating a blended family, there can be tensions and even fighting between the family members.
This site shows that new love can be created: between step children, between step children and step parents. This teaches us that love conquers all.
If you watch Kyler Quinn in the video titled "Don't Tell Daddy", you see a charming young lass and her step brother, Damon Dice, have real feelings for each other. Those feelings are expressed when the couple make out with hugs and kisses. Of course, the feelings have to be kept secret, because these two are step brother and step sister, and they are not married to each other.
But the parents, especially the step father, seem deaf and blind to what is happening between the two loving step children.
The step brother is kind of a dork. He is big and muscular, with a beard starting to sprout, but it's Kyler Quinn, with her lovely face and nimble hands, that caresses Damon's cock until he overcomes his fears of getting caught and allows Kyler to give him a blowjob, then fuck her from behind, while the unsuspecting step father is sitting only a few feet away.
The step father, although not blind, pays no attention to the moans and groans that Kyler emits as she reacts to the pounding her step brother gives her. It can make your heart swell with happiness that the two step siblings are experiencing such joy.
This is what blended families should be doing: make love, not war, the slogan from the hippie era, has spread throughout the videos that My Family Pies is showing.
Also, the video shows that America needs to upgrade its healthcare system, because the step father is obviously going deaf, that he is not able to hear the cries of joy that Kyler is making while getting fucked.
So Donald Trump, our glorious commander-in-chief, needs to start throwing money at the US healthcare system, to improve the services the elderly population is receiving.
Less time on the golf course, commander, and more time speaking to experts who can fix our nation's health care problems.
Some things are more important than money. And Donald Trump has shown us, through a life of clean living and moral turpitude, that love and honor are what really count in life.
If you have a high moral standard, refuse to lie or steal, then you too can create an atmosphere where great porn can be created.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. This is because, in spite of the small size of the site, this site shows how important love can be in a family.
Thus, the moral courage of the family, the strength of family ties, is the bedrock of American values, and lifts the value of the site to something that every PU member can relate to.
However, if you are a Commie-loving SOB, then family values are less important to you, and your enjoyment of the site could drop the score to 75 or less.
(Trump is best friends with Putin and the leader of Communist China, he admires the power they have, which is a good thing, because powerful leaders should all stick together. And maybe Trump can change the constitution, so he can be President For Life, or maybe his daughter Ivanka can take over when Trump retires.)
Pre-checked cross-sales seem to be a special case.
I've been dinged when I miss seeing a pre-checked cross-sale, and always had to pay for the trial period, but at least I cancelled the membership immediately, because the trial turns into a very expensive monthly membership.
I remember reading one PU member who was able to get a pre-checked cross-sale refunded, but he was aggressive, and I don't remember what threats he used: whether he was going to report it as fraud, contest the charge with his credit card company, or what else he threatened.
When I sign up with any porn site, I spend a lot of time checking the site for pre-checked cross-sales. Almost as much time as filling out the form.
They are a normal part of the join process.
There are a few sites that don't use a pre-checked cross-sale, but they are definitely in the minority.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
