| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Anal Violation
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site that led me to join this network all because of one scene. Please read my comment in the Bottom Line about Analized. The information is incorrect on The Best Porn and left me with a network of very little of what I expected.
Gabriella Paltrova and Jaclyn Taylor in the scene “Slut Training”. Wasn’t as good as I expected, but it was enough to get me to join the network.
High quality downloads, unless I missed one, all scenes have up to 4K.
Downloadable picture sets and they’re not bad, could use a boost in resolution at on 1920x1280
Some of the scenes are pretty good, especially the ones with more than 2 people. |
| Cons: |
This network is part of a network that is part of a network. Nothing I found before joining told me of the sites I was not going to have access to or told me exactly of which sites I had access to. I don’t know if they changed the way their network(s) work, but The Best Porn listing hasn’t been updated since the change. Please look into that.
It's man porn. What do I mean? It’s more about the guy’s ass and balls than anything else. I don’t hate this type of porn. It just seems like such a waste to have a beautiful model only to focus on how far the man can stretch her ass open. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am going to put the explanation here of the problem with Analized as a network. They also own Porn Force, Full Porn Network and James Deen. Reading The Best Porn review, it lists 14 sites that come with Analized. Those included the sites I was interested in DTF Sluts, Big Daddy POV, Your Mom Does Porn and POV Perverts. I have access to NONE of those. I have access to Anal BBC, Anal Amateurs, this site Anal Violation, Your Mom Does Anal, Teenage Anal Sluts, Her Gape and Homemade Anal Porn. That is 7 of the sites listed on The Best Porn listing. I’m not as upset as it may seem. It’s just I’m not really into anal, at least not this much and I had to join their other network to get sites that I thought came with Analized.
This scene with Gabriella Paltrova and Jaclyn Taylor was what made me interested. Add those sites I thought I was included, and I thought I had found a really good deal. It was $10 on New Years Day. The scenes on this site are a little more creative than the previous site I reviewed from this network. There does seem to be more of a setup and story with the scenes. The woman wants to try anal. Different objects are used to prepare her. The sex is okay. It is just the focus of the camera that becomes annoying. I get that anal sex is probably difficult to record unless maybe POV. But the constant view of a hairy ass and balls flying around just doesn’t help my feeling towards porn like this.
That is why the scenes with more than 2 people are the ones I like. The camera has to pick everyone up or bounce around by couple to couple and doesn’t get stuck in that one view. Maybe I am being too critical when I say anal sex is not the most camera-friendly sex. One scene on here comes to mind, the woman on her back and the guy squeezing her legs together. Good, creative positioning for the couple since squeezing the legs together causes the anus to open more. All I can see as a viewer is the woman’s legs squeezed together, about ¾ of the man’s dick and nothing else. I can’t even see the penetration.
On the positive side, it has 141 scenes, acceptable photo sets and the videos can be downloaded from 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The group scenes are quite good. The scenes are even long. Some even over an hour, especially when more than 2 people. That’s my way of saying they should just do away with the one on one anal scene. If you’re going to be wild and kinky add a few more couples in there. It’s an okay site on an okay network, as long as you know which sites you’re going to receive. There are a lot of ads for their other sites. From the looks of it those sites used to come with Analized, they then split it up and didn’t tell anyone. |
|
02-05-22 11:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Superior technical quality, anal-centered, including DPs
520 scenes with downloadable photos and videos.
Long scenes (40-60 minutes is common)
Extensive tagging system that may go further than needed.
It is updating, but there is no set schedule and some updates may be questionable with a scene in May seemingly being Christmas-themed.
Pro models with the pros and cons that come with that. |
| Cons: |
Scenes are formulaic despite the long duration.
The updates do concern me. Two some months, 0 in one month, four in one month. It balances out if you have a year membership, but not as good if you’re on a monthly membership.
European pro models can be very inconsistent OR robotic, there’s not a lot of middle ground. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is going to mark off a lot of “good” check boxes. The videos are long, the photo sets are real photo sets, not screencaps, they also have screencaps too and the quality if impressive. Nearly 200 of their 520 scenes have 4K in their download options.
This is an odd one for me. As much as I prefer long scenes, the long scenes on this site do not really have anything to do with story or building of a story. The scenes are just 40-60 minutes of hardcore sex. Their tagging system reminds me of the long length videos too. One scene has 44 tags. Some of the tags are also not very specific like, “watery” and “casual” or “fake” is that fake boobs? Fake action? Fake cum?
The theme doesn’t change in these scenes. It’s very straightforward that you’re going to see all three orifices of the woman penetrated and for those into dual penetration they have a tag for that. They even have tags for dual penetration positions like DP-Cowgirl, DP-Standing, DP-Reverse Cowgirl. I can’t be negative about the action and do think it’s why these professional models are better suited by sites like this. These models seem to be used to the camera, the dual penetration, the rigors of a 40-60 minute hardcore scene, sometimes with two men. It’s very watchable. I usually would feel uncomfortable with scenes like these since so many sites try to show the model in pain or looking like she’s being forced. This site gets a “good job” star on their report card for making clean, watchable, sexy, visually pleasing porn.
The download options are also extensive: It does look like they may encode their videos a little high. They have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p, mobile, a high res photo zip file that has photos that are 5700x3600 resolution and a screenshots zip download.
I believe it just comes down to your mood. You’re not going to get much story. The models are very attractive and seem to not only enjoy the scenes, but even give very real performances. It’s polished porn, but I believe in this hardcore of a niche that’s not that common. This niche seems more suited for a dark room with a couple of amateurs. I like the site. On the videos and the encoding, the 720p videos are encoded at 4500-5000 bitrate and it does make the files large, especially when combined with the length of the scenes. Some of the 4K scenes are nearly 20GB each. Complaining about a site excelling at something isn’t much of a complaint. |
|
08-31-21 08:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large, hardcore site focused on anal sex.
854 scenes with 2 updates per month.
Up to 4K video downloads on newer scenes.
Each scene has a professional quality downloadable photo set.
The models are professionals and most are European. The average model on this site is at least attractive. |
| Cons: |
Hopefully, you are just on the site for the porn/sex. This site has little to no plot to the scenes and very little talking or set up.
At least for me, the guys are a mixed bag when it comes to attractiveness. It could be the European part.
Scenes are long which is usually a pro for me, but with no story or set up, the length is just a show of the long, I would even say dullness of the content. |
| Bottom Line: |
Asshole Fever is a site that I believe is love or hate. If you absolutely love anal sex and no story, it may satisfy you, but for me the site falls short.
On the technical side of things they do everything right. The newer scenes have video downloads from 140p to 4K. Those can also be streamed in a streaming player that works well. The picture sets are even good quality, around 150 photos per set and high resolution or low resolution download zips. The site works well, but when your content is this narrow of a niche, there isn’t a lot of work needed to keep the site from being confusing. You’re going to get basic, shallow, anal sex in each scene. I usually don’t look into European sites. My little experience with porn tells me European sites are often too straightforward (which may not mean shallow to you) and to the point. There needs to be more to keep my interest and attention.
The female models are attractive and if I could give the site a positive comment about their content, most of this is not violent, or ultra-hardcore anal. Some of the scenes even remind me of what other PU reviewers describe as heartcore.
The site is large with 854 scenes and they are updating -- not on a perfectly set schedule, but do average 2 updates per month. I believe once a site has over 500 scenes they are getting into the area of there’s going to be overkill when the scenes don’t vary much. That is what plagues this site for me. I have nothing against anal sex and have joined and enjoyed anal sites before, but without much communication between the actors, the lack of a story, there starts to be too much working against the site. I even wonder if the one on one aspect of the content hurts it for me. That I have seen there is not even a threesome scene. It’s all one on one and that does create a dilemma for me. Maybe I am thinking the anal genre, it should be more raunchy, or more hardcore, but it’s just not. The scenes are plain and I want to believe a less mainstream act like anal should be more than plain.
This may not even be a negative about the content itself. I usually do not like sites that find one set niche or genre and just do it to death. You can see the negative puzzle coming together. No story, no talking, anal, anal, anal, nothing raunchy or kinky, every scene, over and over. I won’t go that low on the score since I do believe my subjective opinion is hurting the score. The site does most everything right except for parts that I don’t like. It could be okay for others, then the high quality content would be a major pro. For me, I have seen better anal sites. |
|
08-10-21 06:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Assylum.com
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The director allows the models to act spontaneously.
There are weeks of planning and discussions with the models that take place before the scene happens.
BDSM forum where you can offer ideas for scenes.
The site has exclusive content that is very creative. (See below)
You see some of the biggest names in BDSM porn. They don’t shoot models that are not seriously into the BDSM lifestyle and they don’t work with talent agents unless they have experience representing BDSM models.
There are interviews with the models, both before and after the scenes and also clips of them doing hobbies such as making pasta or working out. These models make you feel you know them. |
| Cons: |
There are more models on the site besides those listed.
If you want 4K there is a more expensive option.
The site has been updating recently at one a month, which is average for rare specialty porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
BDSM porn is about domination and submission, a power transfer between consenting adults. It is a lifestyle for serious participants who live out the fantasies. Most of what passes for BDSM in porn is not much like what those who do these things in their personal lives actually do. On this site you have an invitation to see a world that you may never witness otherwise.
In contrast, this site has real male dominants who are paired with women who authentically want to submit on camera. you can see it in their eyes as well as their facial expressions. There is a lot more than rough anal sex going on here; there is crazy, demented, challenging bondage. Many scenes have humiliation, both verbal and physical, as well, giving you the feel of authenticity. Weeks before a scene is shot, the attention Is focused on making the scenes as creative and engaging as possible. The models are asked for input as to what they want to do and each scene is based on the model’s unique personality. Here you find scenes that are individually hand crafted.
Most porn sites have models that you have seen on many sites before, but here the approach is different. There are many attractive models on this site, but the focus is on their performances more than their looks. If a model does well, she gets more scenes. The site says that they will interview models, but don’t want subs who are into this just for the money.
A few mainstream performers are to be found here, such as Casey Calvert. In the last few years, they have worked with some superstars of BDSM porn and a few I think who are exclusive to this site. One I have seen on other sites is Rebel Rhyder, a beautiful superstar who would do well on a glam model site. You would not believe she would do these things. I swear there is no sex act or BDSM scenario that is more than she can handle and handle like the ultimate pro that she is. Included in her five scenes are a three hour gangbang that is nonstop, sadistic, anal insanity. The idea was hers and I could not believe what happened in that scene. Hint, it has four doms, two male and two female.
Another big name BDSM star is Charlotte Sartre. I have seen her on a few other sites, but her fifteen scenes here are collector’s items, true BDSM classics. Her specialty is degradation and my favorite one of her scenes is Rim Jobs For All. She recites a script with praise for how much she likes to give rimjobs, all while doing, guess what? Rimjobs to two doms.
As is common on BDSM sites, the models have interviews both before and after to tell you the scene was consensual fun for them. Six of the models have one minute clips of them showing their non porn hobbies. They come across as ordinary people who happen to like BDSM, so you can feel you they are relatable. These are not some strange group of perverts; they are women who cook, work out or make crafts. Some don't even wear makeup.
The bondage is some of the most interesting that I have ever seen. There are many kinds of rope use, but also there are many different devices and props. Think plastic bins or masks as examples. The positions most models are in are often visually impactful and the models happily endure discomfort for long periods. The sex is mostly anal, but there is a lot of female on male rimming, ass to mouth and a lot of oral that is quite forceful. I like that the scenes are unscripted and the reactions of the models comes across as quite spontaneous. Despite the videos being extreme, the models seem to be friends who are interacting without being mean, they are just friends that have a shared interest.
The same company has two other BDSM sites, Slave Mouth and Dom the Nation. I liked both of them, but this is not a network. The models who are willing to make these scenes are by definition rare, the ideas complex, the filming very intense, as well as time consuming to edit. Many scenes are well over an hour and some are so long that they are split into parts. After you join you see a link for joining each additional site at a discount.
If this interests you, this is well worth a premium price. Did I forget to say they have 234 videos ? |
|
10-28-21 07:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Bad Daddy POV
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A glorious tribute to the always growing stepfamily niche of porn!
188 scenes with updates coming in every 3-4 days.
Pretty girls and settings that will make you believe these are barely legal girls.
Jerk Off Instruction scenes included, I believe these scenes could be the easiest way for straight women to get into watching a solo woman.
Not a lot of download options, but they do have 480p, 720p and 1080p
Navigation is good and site includes access to the Full Porn Network. |
| Cons: |
I have admitted I like perversion, but there are some of these settings that are going to push your button for, "is that going too far?"
Site is a little cluttered with 3 ads across the top and 4 across the bottom. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm going to explain the settings part since it made me laugh, but may be a little too perverse for some. Some of the scenes happen in an all-pink bedroom. There are stuffed animals, glittery curtains, all the stereotypical items you would expect to see in a little girl's bedroom. They do go out of their way to point out all their models are 18 or older and they do not condone incest. Part of the scenes are Jerk Off Instruction. I wouldn't say I have had any problems being attracted to watching young women masturbate, but for some women there is a stigma that comes with watching other women masturbate. I do think these Jerk Off Instruction scenes directed at men, can be an easy introduction to porn for women who are not used to watching it. I do believe most women had at least one moment in their life where they thought about teasing a guy and talking him step by step through how she wants him to masturbate for her. I could be wrong, but I have introduced the niche to other women and they like it too.
The other scenes are filmed from a POV orientation of the Bad Daddy. Who is supposed to be the stepdad having sex with his stepdaughter. I do think this site does this style of porn very well. Most of the stepfamily sites I have joined and even liked use humor or unbelievable stories to show you it's not real. This site doesn't. Since you don't really see the stepdad it's more about seeing the young woman looking seduced, curious and aroused by this charming older man. I like it.
They are nearing 200 scenes. These scenes each come with a small photo set you can download and the videos have 480p, 720p and 1080p download options. It's a simple site and that's not a bad thing. The biggest reason I returned to this site and network was I saw where they had a new Karma Rx scene and she's probably my favorite. I noticed rearadmiral's comment about the age of the models being too high to fit the stepdaughter role and can see that, even with Karma Rx who I believe is late 20's. I guess we just have to use a little more suspension of belief and figure the mom's a cougar with a younger husband!
The scenes while lacking the humor of a site like Family Strokes, there are times I do find myself laughing. Whether it's bad acting or really bad use of words. They do push the serious side of the site, but not as much as all their disclaimers make you expect. The site and network is worth a try. There is a lot of good content on the site and network. This site is the reason I came back. I do think it's interesting that I know more women who like the Jerk Off Instruction scenes more than the number of men that do. Recommended for those that like a little perversion in their porn. |
|
09-09-20 02:15am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
31
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
GERMANTZ's Reply
When I paid for the site it made my account a "prime" account. That's the only difference I can tell prime adds. It takes you from a free account with no downloads to an account you can download with. The welcome email even says, "Welcome! Congratulations on joining Bang Prime!"
The Premium channels just look like adding other paid sites to your account. They offer Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, Tushy Raw and Vixen. It doesn't list any details like how much they cost or if you're getting the whole sites or not.
|
09-30-20 12:00am
|
Review
32
|
Bang.com
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The biggest, most overwhelming porn site I have ever joined.
132,436 scenes and they update with at least 12 scenes per day.
18,144 models, that's a small city.
Their original series scenes are quite good.
45,107 of the scenes are available in HD quality and 1,613 of the scenes are available in 4K.
Somehow this monstrosity of a site has good navigation.
No problems using the biller that others have experienced according to the comments here. |
| Cons: |
Maybe I should quit my job? This is like a mountain of porn came crashing down on my computer.
The size of this site very well could be its biggest con. I am using the category filter to at least find some content I want, but the pages and pages of scenes is just frustrating. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was looking for a site with a little bit of everything. A little bit. This site has a whole lot of everything. Some of the less popular niches I like have these totals:
395 bisexual scenes which is more than 90% of the bisexual standalone sites I have joined. They make that and my point even clearer when they show me they also have a bi-sexual category with 14 more scenes.
1,285 "shemale" scenes. What I do like about their search engine is you can click shemale, it brings up the 1,285 scenes. You can then click solo and it searches within the 1,285 shemale scenes and shows 44 of them are solo.
Niches that are usually very uncommon are common on this site. The Voyeur category brings up 1,419 scenes. They even have 1,787 compilation scenes.
While I did find a lot of scenes to download in the above specified favorite categories, it's their Original series that sets them apart for me. They have 12 of these Original series. These scenes have high production value, but it looks like they have stopped releasing many of them. It could be due to the Pandemic, but it's still disappointing.
The video quality does vary the further back you go, but most of what I have watched is at worst 480p and are decent quality. I am not as much into the technical parts. Most of my interest porn started with Vivid, bisexual scenes and males masturbating. Most of those are in 480p quality or standard definition.
The problem with the older scenes is I am thinking these are just from DVDs and a lot of them are not interesting. One of my main reasons for joining this site was the content I used to get from Tainster. This site has 36 DVDs of Party Hardcore content. These DVDs are broken into parts which was the only disappointing part about finding them here. The Party Hardcore site also breaks the performances into multiple parts which can be difficult to watch as they change camera angles from scene to scene. When combined with all the bisexual content and transsexual solo content, it makes this site a very good value for me. I just wouldn't want to be a member trying to find something without knowing what you're looking for. The navigation is handled by just clicking boxes. It works well, but the categories are often vague and unless you know exactly what to type into the search box, like "Party Hardcore", I believe you could spend a month just looking for the content you want. I don't see this as a site I will return much, but it was good for finding some specific content I was looking for. |
|
09-08-20 10:48pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
33
|
Beauty 4K
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Sexy hardcore action with very pretty girls.
102 scenes with a new scene added every month.
As the name suggests, the video quality goes up to 4K on all scenes.
Each scene comes with a downloadable photo set.
Videos are downloadable and there are no limits.
Epoch is the biller. |
| Cons: |
The scenes are a little on the plain or vanilla side.
The guys in the scenes are annoying.
Too much camera love from the models that seem more interested in looking at the camera than having sex. That may be a personal one. These girls are very pretty and they know it. They stare at the camera. |
| Bottom Line: |
You have two major selling points with this site. The models look young (18-22), they are very pretty and the video quality is exceptional. The sex isn’t bad. The models just seem like they would be better off in solo videos. In one scene, the very pretty model is in a cowgirl position. The cameraman is filming from behind to show her very nice butt and she’s turning her around looking at the camera. I do think that is a weakness I see in a lot of hardcore scenes. She would probably be an incredible solo model with all that eye contact with the camera.
One model is getting her toes sucked and is looking at the camera on the other side of the room. There has to be a better show of connection between the male and female for me to really enjoy hardcore scenes.
The site isn’t huge with only 102 scenes and it’s not going to become huge with only one update per month. They have another 8 years before they reach 200 scenes. I don’t think it’s a Covid-19 problem either. It looks like they have released an average of 1 scene per month since 2018. There are a few months with two updates, but there also are a few months with no new scenes.
The scenes come with a downloadable video and downloadable photo set. The videos have these download options: 404p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. They have 4K even on the oldest scenes from 2015.
The scenes have very little story or dialogue, but they do try to work some fetishes and different niches in. There is a massage scene, some foot fetish, young and old, they’re at least trying to give the viewer something to work with. I listed plain/vanilla in the cons. What I mean by that is the scenes are very similar from scene to scene even if they work a fetish in or a different niche.
The feeling I get from this content is they know the models are very pretty and the video quality is high quality so that’s enough. It’s not enough. The dorkiness of the guys trying to get themselves on camera too is annoying. The acting itself is acting. The girls jump back and act surprised to see a dick. The guys are just jumping in front of the camera. I see the models as ideal solo models since they wouldn’t see a dick to be surprised by and they wouldn’t have a guy hogging the camera lens. It just isn’t the type of hardcore porn I like. It could be for others since you do have the two big selling points to think about. |
|
09-28-20 09:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Beauty Angels
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, solo girl and lesbian scenes.
515 scenes with 3 to 4 scenes added each month.
Porn User's price of $14.95 is very good.
Downloadable videos and photo sets with each scene.
The newer videos have 4K.
Good use of settings including the bathroom and shower. |
| Cons: |
The not that much older scenes (2013) only have up to 720p.
Very little story or dialogue. |
| Bottom Line: |
The title of this site could be subjectively questioned. I didn’t list it as a con, but there are some models on this site I don’t even find attractive. My main interest in solo girl porn or lesbian isn’t in the model’s looks. I still don’t consider myself bisexual or lesbian. I do like watching younger women masturbate and play around with each other in lesbian scenes. I didn’t list the looks part in cons since their looks are not part of my interest in this type of content.
I was surprised to see the videos as new as 2013 only had up to 720p in the download options. The newer scenes have 720p, 1080p and 4K. The big mistake I likely make with sites like this one is I forget they don’t speak English -- or Hindi. I don’t require a story, but I do like to know what they are saying.
This is a normal solo and lesbian site. The lesbian scenes are believable enough. You can see the tongue touching the clitoris. The solo scenes feature believable orgasms including pussy lip spreading to show contractions. It’s hard to pick whether the solo or lesbian scenes are better or worse when comparing the two. The lesbian scenes do seem to get a little kinkier. One part I have noticed is the newer solo scenes are more dependent on toys instead of fingers. The older scenes have more fingering in them.
You have 515 scenes with video and photo sets. The update schedule is okay with 3, sometimes 4 new updates per month. The discounted price here on Porn Users helps a lot too.
My favorite setting for solo and even lesbian scenes is the bathroom or shower. They have a good selection of scenes from those locations. I think it’s just the belief these girls look so young they would be using the bathroom for their masturbation. I didn’t list this as a con, but could have. The camerawork could be better. I have watched several scenes where the model is orgasming in solo, but the camera is pulled back. I don’t want close-ups, but I would like to see a closer view on the orgasms.
It’s a good site for what it is, but I have seen better. That could be the language barrier. Some of the models are very quiet and barely look or sound like they are enjoying themselves. |
|
09-28-20 09:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
BFFs
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A standalone site by the Team Skeet group.
Scenes are interesting, silly, funny, high production quality and most are very long (45 minutes or more).
137 scenes with videos and photos to download.
Some of the "cuter" lesbian scenes I've seen.
Updates twice per month.
Not all scenes are just females, some have multiple guys in them as well. |
| Cons: |
Like other Team Skeet sites there's a block of ads right in the middle of the scene listing.
I can't find a model list just for BFFs, the model list at the top of the page shows me all the models on all the Team Skeet sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site looked fun and I have generally liked the Team Skeet sites, especially the standalone ones. It was exactly what I expected and hoped for.
One scene is a group of 3 dorm friends peeking in the door and recording their friend having sex with a guy. There are a couple of exercise/fitness scenes that are better than all the content I saw on Fitness Rooms. It's very professional feeling and I think with content like this, it has to be. You're really not going to get a roomful of amateur girls to just start ad-lib from yoga into an orgy.
I read some of the previous reviews and thought I would update some of the cons others have listed. The download options on videos are 1080p, 720p, 576p, 480p and 360p. The 1080p files are very large due to the length of the scenes, one I downloaded was 4.5GB for a 1080p 53 minute scene.
They have those options on all 137 scenes.
They do list the models names and you can click them to see if they have any other scenes. Some are very vague like Ecstasy and one of the guys is John Doe.
They have trailers, screencaps, pictures and videos of each scene.
I think the strongest point of the content is that there is a story even if it's silly. I also joined their standalone site Family Strokes and thought it had a very similar feel to this site.
I have read that Team Skeet is going to start including these standalone sites with Team Skeet for a special price. Even having paid the add-on price of $10, I feel I got my money's worth. I downloaded 45 scenes and feel like they will be ones I will keep and watch multiple times.
There's nothing at all serious about any of these scenes. They even have one with 3 girls playing video games, with the "loser" having to have sex with one of the girl's geeky brother. I like porn like that. Just give my imagination something to work with.
The only real negatives are the ones you'll find on all Team Skeet sites. Every few rows of scenes there are two rows of ads. I don't find them that bad just because I would like to try more of their standalone sites and those ads give me an idea of which ones I might like.
For me, it's a very above average site for those that like cute girls being playful with each other. |
|
10-22-19 01:51am
Replies (1)
|
Review
36
|
Bi Empire
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
In my opinion, the best bisexual site, but it’s not without faults
There are 255 scenes. Up until 3 weeks ago, it was updating weekly, but has not been updated over the last 3 weeks.
The models include some mainstream porn models which is not normal for bisexual sites. There are 214 models total (male and female).
Videos are downloadable (extra cost) in 480p, 720p and 1080p. This is also not normal since most bisexual scenes are from 2013 or before. The ones here started in 2016.
Nearly all the models of both sexes are very attractive.
Professional production compared to more amateurish production on other bisexual sites. |
| Cons: |
You have to pay extra for downloads. The price for the site is $9.95. To add downloads, it’s $14.95 more. They are worth it if you are into bisexual.
Probiller is difficult to cancel.
Even with good production the niche limits itself to get everyone involved. |
| Bottom Line: |
I do not like joining sites from the company that owns this one, but my bisexual collection needed some higher quality scenes and if you are looking for higher quality bisexual scenes you will not find many bisexual sites that match this one.
One of the first things you will notice are the known mainstream models. Lady Dee, Sarah Key, Rae Lil Black, Cindy Shine and Jennifer Mendez to name a few. Most bisexual sites have performers that are either amateurs or ones you have not heard of. The other option with bisexual sites is they do not even give you the names. I do believe seeing mainstream actresses filming bisexual scenes with two men shows the niche is growing in popularity.
You will also notice when you try to download a scene you receive the pop-up that says you do not have access to downloads. The membership with downloads added costs $25. It is worth that if you can download all 255 scenes in a month. I do not understand why they do not offer the downloads at sign-up.
The male models on this site makes it my personal favorite. I do think we are seeing male professional models turning to the way female professional models did a long time ago – gay for pay. Very few of the males are effeminate. Most of them even look like they are a dominant male in a male/female scene. Which is where the professional production helps this site. The most common lead-in for bisexual sites is the boyfriend/girlfriend talking and the girlfriend telling the boyfriend there’s a guy she knows who is willing to give him a blowjob or anal sex if he will let the guy have sex with her. The scenes here mostly start out with a male and female having sex. Another male enters the scene and it usually will turn into what looks like a regular, straight male/female/male threesome. That is when they change the script and the new guy in the scene pulls the guys dick out of the woman and starts sucking it.
The video quality is also a big step up from most bisexual sites. I have a large collection of bisexual scenes from other sites. It seems like from 2007-2012, the niche was gaining some popularity, but fell off. Most bisexual sites these days have the content recorded from 2007-2012. The videos here started being published in 2016. You have the 720p and 1080p download options.
The site is easy to use. It has clear menus, a model list and only one ad.
I did not have as much problems with canceling through Probiller as I have in the past. I followed another member’s advice and just sent an email to them. They replied back with a special offer for one of their other sites and cancellation confirmation.
If you go into this site looking at it as a premium bisexual site and knowing you are going to pay $25 for the site with downloads, it is really not a bad deal. Hopefully, someone will make a new bisexual site in the future and will start It out using the same principles they use on Biempire. |
|
08-12-20 12:59am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
37
|
Bi Guys Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
The guys on Bi Guys Fuck really don't have the gay vibe, especially the main one that's in many of the scenes, but it also seems like they're very much there for the pay. The main guy, goes at least 30 or half of the scenes, before he lets another guy give him anal. I think if they had more story with it, it would have made that first time more interesting and the ones before it too.
|
04-19-20 12:24am
|
Review
38
|
Bi Guys Fuck
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Site dedicated to bisexual sex, most of the scenes are two bisexual males and one female.
It currently has 71 scenes on it. They update once a week.
Simplistic site design and choices, nice and clean layout.
They use Epoch as their payment processor.
Small collection of tags (18) for navigation, but do seem to cover everything needed.
Models of both sexes are attractive. |
| Cons: |
Nearly every video starts with a 20 second ad for erection pills. The videos also end with a 2-5 minute interview with the models from the scene. Most scenes are only around 20-25 minutes total.
Very little variety in the models, one guy is in almost every scene. There isn't a model list, but most of the models (male and female) and in several of the scenes.
18 of the 71 scenes are from Hot Guys Fuck, not Bi Guys Fuck, some of these are not bisexual scenes, there are also bisexual females with one male scene. These scenes all venture away from the Bi Guys Fuck theme. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bisexual guys with a woman is one of my favorite niches in porn. I saw this one advertised as new on The Best Porn and happy to see it isn't owned by Mind Geek (pay for downloads), I took a chance. Once on the site, I got a nice surprise. They are currently having a 50% off sale on it.
This is niche that is hard to explain the attraction to. I prefer the scenes in this niche that at some point have the woman pull away while the guys have sex and she masturbates while watching. There's a few of those here.
The variety or lack of variety in models would be subjective to the viewer. One guy, looks to be Latino, handsome, very fit, is in nearly all of the scenes. He's even in the dumb advertisement they have at the beginning of most of the scenes. A ray of hope, possibly, the newest scene doesn't have the ad in it.
The scenes do lack much in the way of story which I believe is a weak point of this niche. It is one of the least creative niches and that goes for multiple bisexual sites I've tried. They sit on a bed, someone tells them to start and they're off to the races. I think in my darkest fantasies of this niche, the woman would walk in and catch her boyfriend/husband maybe getting a blowjob from his best guy friend then she would get involved. It could go the other way too. Boyfriend/husband walks in and catches his wife/girlfriend giving his best friend a blowjob.
These type of scenes are hard to find. TBP only listed 21 bisexual sites the last time I checked. You can find them on DVD series on various sites (Evil Angel has some) and the other option is Bi Empire that is now owned by Mind Geek. They require you to pay $15 extra to download.
The only part I thought was kind of cheap was the inclusion of two bisexual females with one man. There are only four of those scenes, but when you only have 71 scenes, it looks like the 71 scenes would at least live up to the site's name.
Of the other 71, the 18 Hot Guys Fuck scenes have a few that have bisexual males in them. Two are one on one male and female scenes. I would say 55 of the scenes have actual bisexual males content in them.
While it is a new site in listing here some of the scenes are dated back to 2015. Each scene has the same options: 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p.
I wouldn't say I'm disappointed. A lot of the videos I've found in this niche are 480p quality, so they do they at least have much better quality than I'm used to. A faster update schedule would help too. It's an above-average site with high quality videos for those that are into the bisexual male scenes. |
|
04-12-20 11:40pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
39
|
Bi Sex Digital
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Look what I accidentally found! The biggest bisexual site I have joined.
279 DVDs.
The DVDs average 3-4 scenes per each one.
Attractive males and pretty females.
A lot of orgies. |
| Cons: |
Look what I wished I hadn’t found. The list of complaints will have to go in the bottom line.
No downloads
The site pages take 3-10 seconds to load.
The streaming player is even slower and is glitchy.
The welcome email told me I have access to other sites. When I tried signing in them there’s no access. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have said in previous reviews of bisexual sites it’s very hard to find good ones. I saw this in a Gamma promo, the price was low (under $10), the amount of content was the most I had seen. Nowhere on the join page or the promo was it mentioned there are no downloads. When I signed up the page glitched with a broken link that said, “Go to member’s area here”. I opened my email account and had two emails from them. Both said Bisexdigital in the subject, but inside the second one it said I have access to Austin Wilde. I went to that site and tried to sign in, it said no account. I went back to the other email which had a direct link to Bisexdigital. The site took forever to open. Once it did, I was able to sign into it and find out all the videos are streaming only.
The streaming player buffers every 3 seconds. The site itself takes up maybe half of my monitor. It looks like it was made in the early days of the internet.
The content looks good, but if I can’t get it to stream without constant buffering and can’t download it, what good is it?
They show having 279 movies. I do not know if they are just counting full DVDs or scenes. The Best Porn review says it has a 200GB daily download limit. The whole site says it has 403GB of videos. That makes the 279 sound like standard definition DVDs at around 1.5GB each.
I do recognize some of these scenes from my collection of bisexual scenes, but there are a lot I don’t have. I don’t know why so many bisexual sites are streaming only. Most of the content is from 8 or more years ago and is 480p in the streaming player.
They have some of the first bisexual DVDs I saw back in 2007. It’s easily the most impressive collection I have seen. With bisexual porn you already know it’s likely to be 480p, so that part is forgivable. I would be willing to pay more to have a download option. That is the main reason I’m not giving it a bad score. The scenes are good. If you’re okay with streaming these scenes are good. Bisexual porn was creative back then. |
|
07-15-20 04:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
Bisexuals Hardcore
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the best collections of bisexual DVD content.
Includes access to the All Gay Sites Pass and access to the All Porn Sites Pass. There are over 100 straight, gay, transsexual, bisexual sites on these two networks.
Not as attractive overall as the models on Biempire, but this site would also appeal to gay men, whereas I do not know if Biempire would.
A total of 175 scenes, I do not think it updates and would not expect it to start updating. These are scenes from bisexual DVDs from the 2007-2012 years. The video quality confirms that.
Good job considering it’s amateur production. I believe these are European models, attractive though some of the guys are very effeminate. I believe that devalues the bisexual experience. |
| Cons: |
This is probably the most common con in bisexual porn – the content is old, at least by porn and technology years. The video quality is at the very best, average.
A lot of the most overused position in bisexual porn, one guy in one guy’s ass, while that guy is in the girl’s vagina. It’s not good for watching (too much movement) and it looks like everyone in it is out of rhythm.
They have a few other bisexual sites on this network with minimal content. It seems like they would just put it all on this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a standalone site on one of the most interesting networks I have ever joined. You receive full access to the network you joined through – for me, that was All Gay Sites Pass and it includes full access to a straight network called All Sites Pass. There are over 100 sites on these networks. Most of what I can see it looks like these were all once standalone sites but stopped updating and are now all thrown together on these two networks.
Bisexuals Hardcore was my main interest in joining. There are scenes on here I am familiar with, there is one Asian woman, maybe a Filipina, who is in 3 or 4 scenes and I recognize her from her excellent body and effort in the scenes.
A few PU members have contacted me and asked about my interest in bisexual porn and what makes it different. I think bisexual porn is mainly marketed towards gay men and straight women. Most women like the fantasy of a threesome with two guys. This is what I like seeing in bisexual porn. At least one of the males has to be convincing as a straight male. Biempire does a good job of convincing the view both guys are straight. The woman (for female viewers) becomes the focus. Is she sexy enough, seductive enough to get the convincing straight male to do sexual things with the other male just to get a chance to have sex with her? I would think for gay male viewers, the turn-on would be believing the gay male actor was able to seduce the straight male.
Bisexual porn is not going to be the highest quality porn you have ever seen. Biempire might change that in the distant future, but most bisexual porn is about sex, lust and orgasms. I do believe my cultural difference from American viewers helps me with bisexual porn. Most men from India would not admit it, but there is a trending popularity in cuckold and bisexual relationships in India.
Though this site uses the overused position described in the cons they also do some more interesting positions. I think one of the most arousing positions in a male/female/female bisexual scene is the male having doggystyle sex with the female, while the other female lays under the female and licks the dick and vagina. The female receiving the doggystyle is doing a 69 with the woman under her. They do that here with a male on the bottom. The Filipina I mentioned earlier does it in all of her scenes.
The two main problems here are common for bisexual sites. The video quality is hit or miss. There are 720p scenes. They are just blended in. The rest of the scenes top out at 480p. They have 5-6 video formats. I do not know why. I do not think you need a .mov, .wmv and .mp4 in 240p. It makes that part of the site (downloading) a little cluttered and even confusing.
It still is a good site for those that like bisexual porn. One of the better ones, really. Nearly all scenes have at least one man who convinces me he is straight. Considering all the bonus content you receive with this site, it’s worth trying out. I once heard that about bisexual sex too! |
|
08-12-20 12:56am
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very big interracial site, but name could be misleading too. It’s not all blacks on blondes.
987 scenes with downloads of videos and photos
Currently updating once per week.
816 female models on this site.
Comes with access to the entire Dogfart network of 23 sites, 2 of those 23 sites are from the gay genre.
Network navigates well and lets you search models by site or entire network.
Uses Epoch as the biller. |
| Cons: |
The scenes are very similar from scene to scene.
Older scenes video downloads are misleading, listed as Big HD, but are only 480p.
Little to no story to the scenes.
4K versions of the videos cost $4 per scene |
| Bottom Line: |
I wasn’t for sure about joining this network since I do like hardcore, but it seemed like the majority of their sites were similar (except the Gloryhole ones). The network does have 2 gay sites on it, 5 solo (one main woman) sites, 13 various hardcore sites and 3 sites of various scenes.
This particular site focuses on anywhere from 1 to 5 black guys having sex with one white (most) woman. I do believe that’s misleading since I think “blonde” is a niche some porn viewers prefer. There are brunettes, redheads and I’m almost positive all of these women don’t fall under the “white” umbrella. Some look Asian, others Latina, some also look biracial.
There are inconsistencies with how the video resolutions are listed. The oldest video is listed as Big SD, that’s one video. The other older videos are listed as Big HD, but they are 480p which is SD.
The other parts of the network and this site are impressive. The amount of models just on this site (816), the amount of scenes (987) on this site and the majority of videos do have 720p and 1080p downloads. The picture sets are also downloadable and I haven’t seen any notices about download limits.
The scenes themselves leave very little to talk about. It’s get naked, follow a script, add 2-3 more guys, follow the script and the scene is over.
I would rate the female models as above average in looks, they all look like pornstars to me and many are in the MILF age range. The male models are as interchangeable as I assume male models in porn directed at men should be. It’s a good site by itself. It’s not going to make you laud the producers or site as the greatest, but if you’re into interracial and don’t mind it’s not all blonde models, you will probably like this site for its amount of content, amount of models and amount of scenes. That 4K price should lower the score, but seeing that I wasn’t that into these scenes, it’s not a big con for me. It is listed right in the cons. They charge $3.99 extra per scene for 4K. |
|
02-26-21 05:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
Blow Pass
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
5 site network with 80% of it being blowjobs.
Very large network with over 5,500 scenes and they are updating complete with masked models. They update nearly daily, looks like 6 updates per 7 days.
Over 2,100 models, some look like amateurs, but a lot are pros.
Immoral Live is included and it is a very good site plus is the only one that isn't just blowjobs.
Navigation works well considering the size the network.
Video quality is excellent. |
| Cons: |
Blowjobs are fun to watch, but there are really a lot of blowjobs on this network! It gets repetitive.
The network hub page feels cluttered, but there's only one ad. They just have a lot of content on the main page. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network reminds me of when I lived in India. We were visited by family friends from the United States. My parents took them out to for dinner and they couldn't believe everything on the food bar -- was chicken or a form of chicken. That is how this network makes me feel. There's a lot of blowjobs and more blowjobs. There are other sexual actions that happen and there is the site Immoral Live which is very good, but the scenes here are about the chicken -- I mean, blowjobs.
The Covid Pandemic scenes are a little out there since the guy wears a mask while getting a blowjob and the woman starts out with a mask on. That's going to get complicated. I do like how they have this network laid out. The sites are: Mommy Blows Best, Only Teen Blowjobs, Throated, 1,000 Facials and Immoral Live. It makes it easy to find your preferences whether teen blowers, MILF blowers, deep throaters or facials. Immoral Live is like a hardcore site with the content being recorded live without cuts or scripts. It is a nice break from all the blowing.
The video quality on this network is as good as I have come to expect from a Gamma site. They offer 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p on all scenes with the newer scenes also adding 4K. With over 5,500 scenes that's a lot of high quality porn. The models do look like professionals or soon to be professionals. As a female I think that does change these scenes. The pro models seem to have a steady, consistent pattern they follow when giving a blowjob. That does make the content repetitive too. It makes me wonder why guys are so much into blowjobs.
This network is a good value. But I did find myself losing interest in it. I think for fans of blowjobs it's an easy choice to join, but if you're not a real big fan of blowjobs, I'm not for sure I would recommend it. It has all the traits you look for in a good porn site, pretty models, high quality videos, easy to use navigation, not a lot of annoying ads, unlimited downloads from what I have experienced, but it does get stuck at it's mostly blowjobs. Good enough for a month join to give it a try and to also check out Immoral Live. |
|
09-09-20 02:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
43
|
Bondagettes
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I just saw where this is a new listing from Adult Prime and thought I would try it since I like BDSM.
There are 116 scenes, but it doesn’t look like it’s updating. The last update was in October 2021, and they were updating weekly up until then.
This is likely true BDSM/bondage.
The videos can be downloaded in HD, no 4K.
One of the dom women is really pretty and sexy. |
| Cons: |
This is not my first time reviewing a BDSM site from this network and I have the same feeling with this one. It’s not for everyone. It’s only for people that truly are into real BDSM/Bondage.
A con I don’t like posting, most of the women are average at best in looks and some are well-below average.
The dom male/rope master, whatever he is called, is also unattractive.
Cameras flashing throughout the scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
This is near a “yikes” for me. I understand that BDSM is a real fetish and bondage is as well. I understand that there is a concept of power and control being explored in BDSM. I understand that many subs can get to or even achieve orgasm from being tied up. These scenes are elaborate with the contraptions. Women that look in the weight range of 150-175, suspending from the ceiling, spinning in the air, but this is one time I have to remind myself and the director, this is porn.
The closest I see to porn is the sub is naked. Most of these women are on the heavier side. Suspending them from the air is just asking gravity to work against their bodies. I am not making fun of them. I am, however, saying this is maybe sexually gratifying for the model or the dom, but it doesn’t give much visual stimulation to the viewer.
The part I noticed most is there is a tall, redheaded, dom female that – just being honest – is hotter than any of the models, but she keeps her clothes on. I know that I talked about this in my last review of one of this studios BDSM sites – there is no sex. None. The videos are 12-20 minutes of a dom tying a nude, chubby woman up, raising her on pulleys to swing from the ceiling, spinning her around, then the closest I have seen to sex it is flicking of the nipples.
That is a weakness of this genre. I believe when sites show the bondage, but it leads into sex, the traditionalists that are into the fetish are going to be disappointed about the fetish stopping for the sex. If you just stick to it like they are now, the people wanting sex are going to be disappointed. If the women were more attractive. You can almost always see their boobs. You can almost always see their butts. Their pubic hair. There is very little explicit.
When you post a review like this one, you except a bunch of fetishists to show up and be angry. This, to me, does not qualify as porn. I wanted to be as sure of what I was saying before saying it. Porn is defined as something made to create sexual excitement. My feeling when watching these scenes is I hope the woman doesn’t fall. I do not see sexual feelings coming from watching this. I am sure there are, no I’m not, I’m going to leave that to show I was trying to talk myself into someone will see this as sexual. I can’t. It looks more like demonstrations of how to create bondage and make it work with a naked woman as the test dummy. Nothing makes me want to touch myself. The dom, especially the male, he looks like he is studying the ropes. He doesn’t touch the women. You may a scene or two that does. I watched 12-13 and it was all I was wasting my time on. This just looks so obscure and very narrow-reaching niche type content that 1% of people will find sexual. Maybe that’s why the updates have stopped. I just happened to notice it was just listed on Porn Users and The Best Porn. It is not for me. I’m not going give it that low of a score because it comes with very good Adult Prime network. If you have a membership, take a look at this site and you’re welcome to tell me it’s very sexual to you. I would like to know that makes this sexual. |
|
01-12-22 08:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Bound Gods
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good-looking, athletic, naked, hung men torturing each other
Over 600 scenes, it hasn’t updated since May 2020 -- probably a pandemic issue.
Categories or tags are listed on each scene. It’s important since some of these categories and tags are very unusual like Corporal Punishment.
Scenes are long (45 minutes plus) and have stories with them.
Each scene has a video and photoset.
All 600+ scenes have 720p download with lower versions also available. |
| Cons: |
I would prefer these scenes to be more solo or maybe adding a female.
Some may not be happy with the video resolution. The newer videos’ HD version is also 720p, but with a higher bitrate than the older ones. |
| Bottom Line: |
This isn’t really the type of site I usually go for. I prefer solo men or at least scenes that involve a woman with the guys. There are exceptions and sites on this network show those exceptions. If the guys are good enough looking and are hard enough I’m willing to look over the preferences in what I’m seeing them doing. Though some of these guys do seem closer to gay than bi or straight they are almost all very masculine. That helps us ladies look at it in other ways like we are the voyeur watching instead of being involved.
It would be difficult to turn away with most of these guys. A few of these guys are commonly found on sites like this and even on sites with dominant females like Wolf Hudson who is a common star on the site Divine Bitches where women dominate men. They do a good job of incorporating a story or fantasy if you prefer to call it that. Some scenes are one or two guys with another guy tied up and they take turns masturbating him or giving him a blowjob. There are some public scenes too. Most of these scenes are filmed in a “dungeon” and it looks real. They have torture racks along the walls, whips, just about everything a good dom has in their personal dungeon. They even link to a site where you can buy the exact items you see used in the scene.
The stories are standard fare, but at least there are stories. With scenes as long as these there just about has to be a story or it would be too long to try and figure out what is going on.
The 720p videos are the largest they offer for downloads, but those are just as good as most sites’ 1080p videos when you watch them full screen. There are over 600 scenes and there is a note on the site talking about how Covid has slowed production. The newest update was in May 2020, right in line with when the pandemic was growing and becoming a bigger concern. Before the stoppage they were averaging 2 scenes per month.
The majority of the scenes are two men, sometimes three, having sex, giving each other blowjobs and torturing each other. I would like it better if they had more of the masturbation scenes even if it’s 2-3 guys masturbating each other. The schematics of any sex -- even with a female, takes away one of the best visuals for me, the hard dick. I would recommend this to gay men who are into rougher sex and play. It’s okay for straight women since these are some of the more masculine male models I have seen in porn. |
|
09-28-20 10:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
45
|
Bound Men Wanked
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Site within the Submissed network. Femdom, but is not very rough and often has sex in the scenes.
Good quality videos and consistency in the scenes.
Most guys would love to be “humiliated” like this!
Very attractive models both female and male.
Includes 6 other sites that are BDSM themes; I would say it is a little tamer than Kink – but is still good.
Should appeal to both male and female viewers. |
| Cons: |
Like nearly all sites with this broad appeal, it has stopped updating
38 scenes on this site, the network has over 700. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first con is the biggest pro/con to this site. This really seems like a site that should appeal to both males and females. While there is light domination by the females, many of the scenes lead to the woman giving the man the sex she’s keeping from him. There is even some role-reversal with the guy taking more control. Most of the scenes do seem like something you would see on Kink’s network and part of the reason is, Kink has some of these scenes in their cross-advertising. I was expecting more scenes, but I’m learning quality over quantity.
The videos can be downloaded in 480p, 720p and 1080p. You can also download photos.
There’s no real pain or humiliation from the scenes I’ve watched. All scenes are male with female. Both seems to thoroughly enjoy the scenes. Surely there are men that would love to be tied up to a chair while a beautiful woman gives him a handjob?
You also get the added tension of how far the woman will let him go. Some of the women do seem to become so turned on by their role of dominance they give in and that’s something – I think, most BDSM sites don’t have enough of. It’s hard to believe a woman who is half naked with a guy groping her with his tied hands wouldn’t become aroused herself.
The closest the scenes get to humiliation involve a guy in something like a pet metal kennel and a woman leading a nude man around with a chain around his neck. There are scenes with ball gags in the guy’s mouth and even duct tape over the guy’s mouth.
Even though I enjoy the entire network it’s this site that is the enigma. The last update was October 30, 2019. This would be one of my favorite sites if it had more scenes and/or was still updating. The network adds more value and includes the sites: Ball Gagger, Femdum, Hogtied Up, Machine Dom and Sub Amateur. |
|
04-19-20 01:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
46
|
Brazilian Transsexuals
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Another long-running Grooby site that has been around since 1999. It also comes with the bonus sites Brazil T-Girls and TGirls Fuck.
It’s a large site with over 8,000 videos and over 1,500 models.
I will have to go more into this. I feel like these Brazilian models have a softer look to them and that really helps in this genre. They have feminine curves.
It doesn’t seem to have a set update schedule, but it does update 3-4 times per week.
I can tell, kinky, wild girls. I don’t know if I’ve seen a 69 by two people with dicks. I have now. Very passionate.
The majority of scenes are solo, but there are some hardcore and something I don’t see a lot that I really like is mutual masturbation between two transsexuals that seems to turn into the 69. |
| Cons: |
This one is subjective and probably common. These models are from a people that is bigger and is built more like Americans. I don’t really dislike those scenes, but I prefer the smaller models.
This one is a little behind on the photo quality and attention to photos as other Grooby sites are. |
| Bottom Line: |
Having never been to Brazil or even South America, I have to admit to something, the first thing I think of when I hear Brazil are transsexuals. It’s possible this was the very first transsexual site I joined. They do show two bonus sites and one is Brazil T-Girls. I believe that was the first transsexual site I joined. The other bonus is TGirls Fuck which seems to be a common bonus site for the Grooby sites. It’s really good, but it’s small. For some reason, I find the Brazilian transsexuals having sex together almost as good as the solo scenes. I do not feel that way about most transsexual porn. There’s a lot of passion in these scenes. I believe that helps any genre in porn. The transsexuals are mostly medium build. I don’t see a lot of smaller transsexuals on this site. They do have more feminine bodies than a lot of transsexuals. I can’t explain why. Their butts are more feminine. And I believe their medium and up builds help make their implants not as noticeable. Their builds are consistent with a large chested woman.
I don’t know the history of transsexual porn, but it does seem like transsexuals have been popular in Brazil for a lot longer than North America. Maybe the popularity of transsexuals helped that? The site itself could use an upgrade. It looks like a site that is 15-20 years old. The search options are limited. It’s not something I would complain that much about. The action is good, the models for the most part, are attractive and they are believable. I don’t think someone can act passionate. I don’t think the pictures are quite as good on this site compared to other Grooby sites, but they’re not bad and they are downloadable in zip files.
One of the actions I like on this site that may be cultural. A lot of the hardcore scenes start out with the two transsexuals laying in bed, nude and masturbating while the other masturbates. Wouldn’t that shock the mainstream world? Maybe the mainstream needs to try that in hardcore scenes? Have the male and female masturbating together and watching each other. They could find some passion and lust. This site found it. I do believe though that makes it a con for anyone that’s not comfortable with transsexual porn. There is a lot of kissing, licking and touching. I will mention this too, there are more tattoos including large tattoos, often covering the entire back or one thigh. There are a few potential problems for some people. They do have more solo than I expected.
Which makes it a really good site for me. I do think this one is maybe too big of a step for those not fully accepting of transsexual porn.
Similar to the other Grooby sites, you do have good customer support and can join through Epoch using Paypal. Navigation requires a lot of scrolling and clicking. The bonus sites are good additions if you haven’t been on those before. I’m just going to stick with if you’re into transsexuals you will probably really like this site and the passionate action |
|
04-11-22 07:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
47
|
Brutal Castings
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with Fetish Network of I believe 52 sites.
Some variety ethnically but all the models are very young.
I normally would avoid a site with the word "brutal" in the title, but these scenes are not brutal at all. Some are even arousing and fun to watch.
I knew a lot of the 59 models which is a surprise for me and like the ones I know of. |
| Cons: |
No longer updating and really I don't think the network is updating.
Nearly every model has tattoos. I personally like tattoos, but know it is more often seen as a negative by porn fans.
Too predictable as each scene is identical except for the models.
Prechecked cross sell |
| Bottom Line: |
Brutal Castings has 59 videos that has not updated since April 2017. It was active for about two years and it was very controversial.
In the documentary “Hot Girls Wanted” porn star Ava Taylor states that her scene on this site turned her off from continuing her career. The fact is that she did scenes after the one on this site and later admitted that the reason she left porn had nothing to do with this scene.
After that controversy the site changed the format somewhat. At the end of each scene, they had an interview with the porn star. They talked about how much fun it was and that they were happy they did the scenes. You see smiling and sometimes laughing. How sincere this was is unknowable. Maybe it was required by the site as a condition in order to get paid. This is fairly common on sites that have BDSM as a theme.
What this boils down to is a site with forceful, but BDSM that is light by porn standards. If you have seen Kink sites, you could even call this one tame in comparison. The basic premise is that a very young aspiring, but inexperienced wannabe glamour model shows up at a modeling agency. She is coaxed into going to topless with panties or just bra and panties. They are verbally pressured to go nude, they resist and are lightly tied up, binding their wrists together with a rope. The abuse is not really much and is primarily verbal.
Ava Taylor looked a bit spaced out in her scene, but not shocked. I think she was not into this sexually and was just earning a paycheck. None of the women seem sincerely surprised or shocked either.
I did not see any anal and every scene is oral by one partner on the other and then vaginal. There is nothing over the top sexually.
Besides Ava Taylor, they also have Sadie Pop, Piper Perri and Gina Valentina. These are all beautiful professionals that can be counted on for top notch scenes. However, one scene caught my eye with star Ally Berry. I have never seen her before but she is my new favorite as she is the perfect combination of looks and believable enthusiasm. I am fairly sure all the models are Americans.
By itself this site does not have enough to get my recommendation. However there are many other interesting sites that are included as the network has 52 sites. |
|
08-12-20 12:51am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
48
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thank you, I have joined several other sites with tattoos being featured, AltErotica and Inked Gurlz, they were the same way. It's all out hardcore. It's makes me think the producers are either shallow-minded or they think they're playing to a certain audience. It's strange to me because I never really thought of just tattoos being alternative, but porn seems to think so.
|
10-22-19 01:14am
|
Review
49
|
Burning Angel
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Major points for artistic quality and production values of these very tattooed models having sex.
1504 scenes, newer scenes have 4K and 8 other video options from 160p to 1080p.
One update per week though they did miss a week recently.
The sex has two speeds, rough and rougher.
Interesting Halloween-themed scenes including a grown-up Wednesday Addams look-alike.
Looks like they spend a fortune on some of their scenes and that someone sat with a notebook writing every step of the scene out. |
| Cons: |
Unique gets boring too. Though they have a story with most scenes they barely touch on it before it becomes just another porn scene except with tattooed performers.
Some of the guys are just hideous to look at. |
| Bottom Line: |
I come from a culture that is very accepting of tattoos. In our history, they were often revered as a show of royalty. As an expat in America, I still have the intrigue towards the tattoos, but haven't got one myself.
Maybe it's just me thinking too much, but do people with tattoos always have rough sex? Does it come with the territory? I like rough sex porn. It's just it seems like every scene here is recorded in double speed.
Some of the models are really pretty. Some of them look like their tattoos make them prettier. A lot of the guys on here look like a full body tattoo would be an improvement.
They have 1,504 scenes, streaming player works great, I only download the scenes with models I like (Karma RX, Lily Lane, Gina Valentina) are a few of those. I do think Gina's inclusion is funny. She's nothing like most of these models when it comes to number of tattoos or piercings, but she's a very pretty woman.
If you're into anal they have 330 scenes with anal. It honestly seems like more than that after watching multiple scenes all with anal.
I think the best scenes on here are the solo scenes. There are only 132, but you do get very rough masturbation from those 132 scenes. It fills in a niche that isn't very popular. Most solo scenes stay firmly in the softcore genre. Joanna Angel, one of the most prolific models on the site has an outstanding balcony masturbation scene. I really think they should focus on releasing more of these solo scenes. The last one was nearly 18 months ago.
That is my one major complaint. The scenes over the last year are interchangeable. They're still creative, they're still different than normal porn, but only until you get over the shock of the body art.
It's a polarizing site to me. There are people who will hate it for all the tattoos and implants and there are people who will love it just for those reasons. I know a site like this promotes an alternative lifestyle and that's where I think they miss. An alternative lifestyle would have solo, lesbian, orgies, swingers, but instead, the majority of scenes are just male/female.
It's recommended for those that like tattoos and if you are into solo scenes the ones here are very good. |
|
10-15-19 12:54am
Replies (2)
|
Review
50
|
Chaos Men
(0)
98.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
What I saw as an obscure gay site is now my favorite gay site.
2,395 exclusive videos of I think amateur men.
They have zipped photos, zipped cam caps (screencaps) and animated gifs you can download. Not all scenes have all 3, but those animated gifs in a zip file (usually more than 5) is the first time I have seen that offered and those are good to save on your phone for “lunch breaks” at work.
CCbill is the biller which I have found is rarely the case for gay sites.
Large collection of solo scenes, the men are mostly masculine, and each scene includes pertinent model facts like dick size, cut/uncut.
High quality videos that can be streamed or downloaded.
Was cheaper than I expected, the price I was given was $12.48 for the first month and $19.95 if you let it recur. |
| Cons: |
Some of the videos look like they are self-shot or shot by someone using a phone camera. The quality is fine, but some are filmed vertically so if you watch on a computer monitor or television the video, even at 1080p, only takes up the middle of your screen.
Exclusive and amateur is just based on my limited knowledge of gay porn. |
| Bottom Line: |
I know it might be unexpected for a straight woman to join gay sites, but I have three reasons. Straight sites rarely have a guy masturbating or being masturbated unless handjob or CFNM and two, gay porn does seem to be the only possible way to see solo men.
The third reason and I would call it the biggest reason is being from India most of the men in India spend their entire lives denying masturbation and saying they have never done it. Which also means they will not do it in front of even their girlfriend or wife. These same men will spend their entire lives looking up porn of Desi women that strip or do sexual dances in their traditional clothes. These same men will then say they “just watch” the videos!
I have been in the United States for over 10 years now, speak English fairly clear and have developed fetishes Indian men wouldn’t do, but American men will do.
Chaos Men has solo scenes that are exactly what I look for. I can find transsexual videos that have good solo videos, but what I look for requires another step of at least masculine men being the ones masturbating. My image of a masculine man might not be like others. Hairy chest is good, a beard is very good and his body frame doesn’t really matter unless he’s slimmer than I am. Most of the gay sites I have joined feature a lot of “twinks”. These are slimmer men that look very young. There is not a lot of fantasy there for me. I probably could dominate them. The men on Chaos Men are not all “bears” either, but most are medium to bigger built in frame and it lets me have my fantasy like and older man looking at a pretty 19 year old woman.
It's not perfect. It does not have categories. You have to search for what you are looking for and hope the search box brings it up. This site has 794 solo scenes. The men are mostly that moderate to bigger build, many have beards or at least some facial hair, some are bald, there are tattoos, which I do not see as adding masculinity. Many even have hairy armpits which you rarely see on the twink gay sites. There’s chest hair, some even have back hair, which is not a turn-off for me. I think the difference in cultures shows there. The hairier a man is the more masculine I see him.
And there are 794 of these scenes! I have been happy with sites that had 20 masculine men masturbating.
A complaint that I think some would have is some of these scenes are 15 years old. Those only have a 240p option on downloads.
I was a little worried it was going to be one of those gay sites where they started out with solo guys then stopped filming solo once they upgraded their cameras, but it’s almost the exact opposite. I was so interested in looking at all these guys that I went through their pages finding when they switched to better cameras. I hope that shows my enthusiasm.
The first 20 solo videos only had 240p videos. The next 60 moved up to 360p. Starting there, they added 720p and 1080p. Which means they have over 700 videos of solo men with both 720p and 1080p download options while only having around 80 in the poorer quality. On the newer videos they also offer two versions of 720p, these add the 60 frames per second version, while the other versions are 30 frames per second. The 1080p in the newer versions is only available in 60 frames per second. I am fine with the 30 frames per second since this site is going to do a good job of trying to make me buy another external hard drive as it is! The size difference between the 720p with 30 frames per second is 414MB, the 720p with 60 frames per second is 1.01GB or more than double the size.
The animated gifs is a feature I have never seen on any site. These are not like the ones you can find on Google, these are up to 5 seconds long and there are 8-12 included in a zip so you can watch them in a row and get the best parts without sound and without needing much space on your phone. The pictures are very good quality and show the guy going from clothed and limp to nude and hard. Those can be downloaded in a zip too.
I have joined gay networks, gay standalone sites, looking for something like this, but cannot say any of those sites made me feel like I could with confidence recommend them to straight women, but I can this one. Straight women and most gay men have similar interests when it comes to men. I never thought I would say I felt lucky finding a porn site, but I do. It is as if this is exactly what I have been looking for and finally found it. Having CCBill as the biller is also great. I joined a few other gay sites that had billers I had never heard of. I'm planning on letting it recur at least for a month since it was only $12.48 for the first month. There also is plenty of the male/male and group scenes for gay men to enjoy too. This is easily my favorite of the gay sites I have joined. The quality continues with the filenames including the model’s name. Had to edit 5 times to get below 5,000 characters. |
|
06-17-20 05:54am
Replies (0)
|
|
