All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
redcham's Reply
I tried that. Cleared the cache, restarting the browser, reset my router. Can't even get to the web page to log in. It just gives me that error message on just the basic tour page let alone any other page. So, not really sure whats happening.
|
12-26-21 03:29am
|
Comment
52
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
12-25-21 06:40am
Replies (9)
|
Review
53
|
Exxxtra Small
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
***Petite Models
**New models featured
*Updates happen about once per week |
Cons: |
***Newer photosets look like higher quality screencaps
**Downloads get throttled if you download too fast or too much
*Needs more TLC for the model pages to help with the experience |
Bottom Line: |
General information to know before getting into the Exxxtra Small portion of the review is that this site is a part of the Team Skeet network. The network has 83 sites with about half of them being included in the the base membership. That should give you an indication on how many sites they have that are considered "premium," and how they plan to pinch you for that extra penny or so. Of the base plan sites, about 13 of them including Exxxtra Small update on a semi-regular basis, but not always weekly. Most of the sites that are featured are from their partner sites or rehashed scenes from Euro studios.
Exxxtra Small at the time of membership had 393 scenes, but now is at 410+ scenes with screencaps and stills. The newer scenes feature 4K videos, mostly. 4K videos are nice, but if that doesn't matter too much to you and are just focused on the content, then 720p or 580p will be more than sufficient. The models that are featured here are petite spinners showcasing their talents. And who doesn't like seeing that? It is nice to see fresh faces in the industry before they make it big and don't return. Think of it as watching the growth of a major talent. Some of the big names to have had graced the site are Veronica Rodriguez, Riley Reid, and Janice Griffith to name a few.
There really isn't much to knock on this site other than maybe the photosets. The newer scenes look like they are just glorified screencaps. If I were to venture a guess as to why this would be, I would say that with the increasing collection of 4K videos, it is just easier to use that with the high frame rate to compensate for the photosets than to do actual stills. Call me old fashioned, but the antiquated approach is still better.
Overall, Exxxtra Small carries Team Skeet. If we exclude the premium sites and the the partner sites, there really isn't much there in the way of original content in recent months. This plus three other sites that update somewhat regularly were the only ones that kept me around for as long as I did. For that, I do feel it justified to give the site a 90 being that the content that is supplied is worthwhile and satisfying to watch as compared to the rest of the sites on the network. One could also make the argument that it is one of the better petite/teen sites out there when compared to similar typed sites. It is certainly worth the try even if it is only for a one month period. |
|
12-23-21 09:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
54
|
Naughty America VR
(0)
91.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
*4k Videos
*Massive collection of content
*Ample photosets to complement videos
*VR scenes available up to 6K
*Remasters of old classics weekly
*Unlimited downloads with a caveat
*Link to Roku |
Cons: |
*Some sub-sites will cost extra and only available for yearly purchase
*Site layout could use some work for ease of navigation, i.e. features available in preview but not membership pages |
Bottom Line: |
Naughty America can boast that it has one of the most comprehensive collection of porn on the web. With at least one update per day totaling over 10,000 scenes. Some are live broadcast scenes back when they used to do that type of thing. But, with VR starting to gain ground and popularity, VR scenes are not being posted a couple of times a week bolstering the amount of content Naughty America puts out.
The quality of scenes have increasing become better over the past few years. Viewing the backlog of scenes, with the earliest being dated in 1999, viewers can see the progression and evolution of how web scenes have been shot. In my opinion, Naughty America should be considered to be one of the standards of how scenes should be shot for videos and photo stills.
Now, for some of the bad things that I have noticed they have been doing that really deterred my rating. The downloads are unlimited to an extent. I say this because of a change they have made in the past year through the use of a Captcha on video downloads only. Users are expected to complete this task for every download they do for videos. Why? Who knows. I assume for download bots, but why make it harder for people to consume your content?
Site navigation is a little tricky. You can do a search for whatever you want to try and find, as so long as they have a tag for it or a link. Some models don't have a link and only can be searched via keyword. There is not a direct link to a list of niches or models. There is only a tab link for videos and their "homepage" which is just page one of whatever the sort is set to on the videos page. And the page system can't be changed to select a page number, but a scroll system where users have to click a solitary button to see more videos.
Not every scene that is posted is accessible and there isn't not a way to filter out the content users don't have access to if they opted out of paying $20 a month for 5 bonus sites. When scrolling through the massive library, it can be difficult at times to decipher what content is "yours" and what is not.
The aforementioned "flaws" I talked about are minor, but should not deter anyone from considering a purchase. Naughty America is well worth the money, and users will be very satisfied with what they get. Almost every pornstar that has graced the business since the late 90's can be found here, and in more recent years some that didn't make it, but still are noteworthy and should be given a watch. If you like watching on your 50" TV, there's a link for Roku to be able to access that, but there are other applications out there that having a dedicated app on your TV won't be necessary. My overall impression from Naughty America is very much a positive one, and it never disappoints with every visit. |
|
12-23-21 10:02am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
55
|
Club Sweethearts
(0)
|
Reply of
Alybator's Review
It makes sense that there are so many scenes and just the sheer amount of content is bountiful since the site started out as a magazine in the 70's originally named Club Seventeen. I wouldn't exactly say that the girls being/appearing as so young is an attractive quality of the site as much as it is an alluring quality. I understand what you are saying though. With this being an European site in origin, they do have different standards over there from an American perspective. However, I do feel that giving the appearance of that innocence is the extent of it. Especially seeing what some of the models do, like you said with handling BBC and all the anal scenes. I'm interested in hearing how your opinion changes over time with more exploration of the site. It seems good from what I have seen and previewed, but the sheer amount of the content is keeping me away since I don't now how I will ever have the time to really dive into it.
|
12-22-21 01:49pm
|
Review
56
|
Nubile Films
(0)
92.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
*4k Available
*Features many models including European stars
*No download restrictions or limits
*Varied kinds and amounts of scenes going back to 2012
*Nearly 1400 scenes and counting
*Treats porn as a art form |
Cons: |
*No VR, but I don't see a need for it. Kind of weird that VR is now popping up everywhere becoming a standard
*Photosets are a little subpar for quality |
Bottom Line: |
To be honest, I took a shot at this site for really only two new-ish models. Nala Brooks and Skye Blue. Boy was I glad that I took a shot on this. The Nubiles group of sites certainly hit the mark, as far as creating sensual experiences.
The site does feature four mini-sites. So, I guess this qualifies as a multisite? Some may think of it as a con, but I do feel that this is a plus for the site since they basically scrapped the idea of building up those sites.
The other sites that are included within Nubile Films are Crazy Hot Mess, Girls Only Porn, and That Sitcom Show. They still split things up a bit between Nubile Films and Girls Only Porn, but stopped updating with Crazy Hot Mess and That Sitcom Show. Although, as far as parodies go, I kind of wish that they would have continued with That Sitcom Show. Maybe that is something to resume in the future? Hopefully?
The updates come every three days or so. Sometimes with updates sooner than that depending on whatever it is that they are trying to achieve. The overall impression of the site is great with discount offers being put out there for the taking every month or so, make the site accessible for any new consumer on a budget. I do highly suggest this site and others under the Nubiles name that doesn't primarily feature POV only scenes. (If you have read any of my other reviews, you know that I don't take to kindly to POV because it is quite frankly boring in my view, but you don't have to agree with me.) The scenes feature sex as being an art form, which should be featured by more pay sites by one of their subsites. Porn really should be everyone and appeal to everyone, and I feel that Nubile Films does just that by creating that image and level of sensuality that an individual or couples can enjoy and share the experience. |
|
12-22-21 01:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
57
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
*Hottest names in porn
*High quality scenes
*High quality photosets
*Over 2,400 scenes available for download and counting
*Unlimited downloads
*Many, many 4K videos |
Cons: |
*Not every scene has a pornstar listed
*Not ever scene has an accompanying photoset
*If you download photosets, you will need to rename ever file you unzip
*No VR just yet |
Bottom Line: |
Jules Jordan. Just like the name Peter North, everyone should recognize his name, the brand, and what to expect from his content. Many of the major names in porn can be found featured on this site. Autumn Falls, Riley Reid, Angela White, Adriana Chechik, Gabbie Carter, and Gianna Dior, just to name a few, can be found here is some of the hottest videos on the internet.
The site puts out an update once every three days, which is somewhat reasonable for the price you pay per month or per year or whatever you choose to do. Some may argue that isn't enough compared to other sites, but Jules Jordan puts out better content than what others try to charge you for on their "premium" content.
The photosets that accompany the vast majority of the scenes are of excellent quality. When I mean "excellent" quality, I mean that the original photo size doesn't look doctored or pixelated, like it has been stretched to give the appearance of HQ or High Res photos. *cough, cough* Br****** *cough* T*** S***t *cough, cough*
To be frank, yes. Jules Jordan is a bit on the pricey side of things. However, the quality of content more than makes up for that and the time it takes to wait for new updates. Waiting three days for that special scene to come out featuring Jada Stevens, Vina Sky, Athena Faris, or whoever you want to watch with Chris Strokes or Dredd is worth the wait. This site is one that I am glad I went in on and will be visiting again in the future. |
|
12-22-21 01:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
58
|
Reality Kings
(0)
73.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
*Top talents in the business make appearances
*New talents are consistently featured with some talent that are hard to find anywhere else
*Consistent updates; two scenes daily
*Very wide range and amount of content to select from |
Cons: |
*Many sites are not updating at all or very little
*Everything is basically for "RK Prime" for some reason
*Site went through a "face lift" which made navigation harder
*Photosets progressively got worse
*4k not available...still... |
Bottom Line: |
I first joined the site off and on since 2009, and have seen many changes over the course of 12 years. Some good, some bad, and now it seems like another MindGeek heist with the management of the site.
Throughout the years, the sites that were something to look forward to when it came to updates were First Time Auditions (last update was Dec. 2020) with only 195 updates, Pure 18 (last update was Sept. 2020) with only 158 scenes), Big Naturals (last update was Dec. 2020) with 380 updates, and Teens Love Huge Cocks (last update was Oct. 2020) with only 329 updates.
Where have all the updates gone to? Why abandon their bread and butter? Well, to answer that question, they have and have not. Which makes it seem like they are attempting to "rebrand" without giving it a label. Every thing is being dumped into one site. RK Prime.
RK Prime is the lazy solution to the multisite it seems. You will find that many of the scenes they post for this site should be put into the other sites. By doing this, it makes it seem like most of the site is being neglected. Are they really being neglected? When you start looking around on IAFD and other database sites you will find that they also have deleted or lost scenes, as well. This is a common thing across all MindGeek run sites.
Overall, the content is almost the same, but the climate is changing as such that the sites that made RK and reputable name in the adult multisite biz is now looking a bit lazy. The marketing ploy to bolster "all these sites" with "all these models" looks a little like a wolf in sheep's clothing with a handful of the newer scenes becoming more and more gimmicky with a weird and very niche twist. If one were to buy, you would be buying for the name, which is fine. A name can be dependable to an extent and are guaranteed a product of its name with their older content, but a name can only carry you so far before realizing the potential that other sites can bring and take you to. |
|
12-22-21 12:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
59
|
Fake Hub
(0)
|
|
12-11-21 05:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
60
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Membership
If you go the one month route, it is $9.95. 3 month choice is $59.95.
Video Quality
5K, 4K, 1080, 720. The highest qualities look fantastic on a tv. The newer scenes are definitely worth streaming/casting to a UHD tv for enjoyment.
Photosets
Divided up into "episode" and "bts," or in some of the older scenes "solos." They are worth the download for most, but the "bts" sets are hit or miss and aren't really necessary to have or to post for that matter.
Access
TeenFidelity membership gets you access to PornFidelity and Kelly Madison, plus extras, which may or may not be worth the view depending on what you want from your experience with the site. For me, I could do without the "extras" since the main site has copious amounts of scenes to view. |
Cons: |
Log-in system
Like the other sites that are managed by the Madison, if you are actively viewing and navigating the site, you will be logged out after 10 minutes or so. The most annoying thing to contend with while trying to peruse the site. For goodness sake, fix this.
Scene Quality
By this, I mean the way they are shot, the angles, and the scripting of the scene. The actual filming quality is fantastic along with the editing of the newer scenes that Ryan Madison is no longer the director of. I find myself always going towards the newer scenes of the past couple of years and watching the older scenes feels forced... Much like how the direction of the scenes play out in the older ones.
Searching and Navigation
The site layout is modernized and looks good, but it could be better with navigation. Being able to find anything on there is slow, clunky, and just comes across as more of a hassle than anything else. |
Bottom Line: |
High quality scenes with great production value in the last couple of years. Go beyond that threshold and you will see what the site used to be and wish that you should have stayed on your side of the line.
The download restrictions they have are the same as they have for 5kPorn and 5kTeens. 15 per week for all sites. At that rate, it will take you years to collect all the scenes. At least the photosets are unlimited. And if you are the 1 month type, then you better do some research before to know what 60 scenes you want out of the 2500 to choose from.
The site updates twice a week, Tuesdays and Fridays, for only PornFidelity and TeenFidelity. Kelly Madison has not updated for awhile now and doesn't appear to be returning anytime soon.
For this site, I don't really have a suggestion. If you like Ryan Madison's style of sex and filming, then you would probably want to be in it for the long haul to download, but if his style is not for you, then the newer scenes will be right up your alley. Just know that it probably will need a 3 month sub to get all of those, assuming that you are the type that downloads. |
|
11-27-21 09:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
61
|
Mofos Network
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
POV and Voyeurism Galore!
Mofos really cornerstones this market with the vast majority of the scenes that are available are in this category. Not really a fan of POV scenes, but I can see the value in them and they do a decent job of producing high quality scenes in this category.
Don't Break Me
Really, the only site that is worth viewing. Tiny spinners handling big gentleman sausage. Generally a recipe for great content, if done right. It sucks that this site doesn't update regularly. When I stopped my subscription, they had 197 scenes in August... It's November and they have 202 scenes.
Solid amount of scenes
Since having a membership, they are now almost at 3,800 scenes with updates every 3 days or so. Some sites update more frequently than others. "I Know That Girl" currently has the most scenes, but the site could easily be branded as any other site with the way it is shot except for "Lets Try Anal" and "Don't Break Me." The wonders of having so many POV scenes. |
Cons: |
POV and Voyeurism...Oh my...
Yes, I put this as a pro, but I see it as a con, too. There really only is one site that doesn't do this style of porn, as highlight just above in the "pros" section of this review. There comes a point where a style becomes overdone, overwhelming, too much, etc. that it just burns you out and turns you off to it when you start branching out to other sites that do that sort of thing some of the time, and could do it better, but by that point have had enough of it.
Photosets are minimal and are just sad...
Don't look at them. Don't consider downloading them. Just don't. That's all.
A lot of scenes... If you know how to find them.
There are 13 sub-sites in MOFOS with only 9 of them updating. And updating on a very slow basis. Some sites are only updating once or twice a month... Maybe. But in reality, if you know how to navigate the site, there are 25 sub-sites. But count yourself lucky to have them before they are deleted. Thanks MindGeek. |
Bottom Line: |
This, for all intents and purposes, is a very, very average porn site. If there was ever a site out there that was a one trick pony, for the most part, and will ride that horse into the sunset until it dies, it is MOFOS. If anything, for any of you newbies in porn exploration out there, this would be a good starting survival kit to get you started in the world of adult filming, and quite frankly it barely takes "making your own porn" to the next level with production. I will credit them to at least keeping the site relevant with new starlets being featured like Aubree Valentine, Skylar Vox, Jackie Hoff, and Aria Sky just to name a few, but there's really only one site that is worth viewing, and for the price they want, that one site just isn't enough. |
|
11-27-21 09:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
62
|
Wankz.com
(0)
60.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
HD scenes
Yes. They do have HD scenes, but most of the SD scenes have better quality than the "HD" scenes they have available. And the 4K scenes are a punchline to a joke that no one got.
Decent Photosets
This is the only saving grace. The photosets. I have said this before in some other reviews, and I will say it again. The photosets are complementary and can enhance the scene. In this case, the photosets are the only thing worth downloading since it seems that they are the highest quality items on the site and have a high view-ability compared to the videos.
Some major names
Riley Reid, Faye Reagan, Kelsi Monroe, Lexi Belle, and Angelina Valentine just to name a few that are featured on the site. Some of the "newer" stars that make an appearance are: Taylor Whyte, Sheri Vi, Gina Valentina, and Scarlett Sage... If that gives you any idea of how "new" some of the scenes are. |
Cons: |
4K scenes?
They really aren't 4k. Some of the scenes look like they are somewhere in between 540 and 720 masquerading as 1080.
New scenes?
The "updates" that are posted look like they were done about 10-15 years ago at the start of HD filming. There is not really any true update schedule, and they come out whenever which makes it frustrating. The partner sites that you get with a membership update more frequently, however they lack quality, as well. |
Bottom Line: |
***Buyer Beware***
This site is partnered up with Lethal Hardcore, or is it Lethal Pass? Hard to tell. Any new scenes are not posted through this site, but their partner site and they are atrocious. It looks like it was shot from an iPhone... 10 years ago. Both streaming and download qualities suffer greatly, and direction of the scenes look tired, old, and just sad. The search features that either site have is clunky and that is being generous with the adjective. At least the older scenes have a "classic" feel to them, but that's the only draw to the site since the "newer" scenes look like they are old and the only thing worth looking at are the photosets.
I would not recommend getting a membership to this site more than once. But I also would not getting a membership to this site at all if you want a fully honest recommendation. If you want to download all the things that you find good, do so at a budget and get out immediately. |
|
11-27-21 08:52am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
63
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
That's scary.
Hope your niece stays safe!
Have a great holiday!
|
11-23-21 03:10pm
|
Reply
64
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
It was one of the "premium" sites (Family Strokes) through TeamSkeet. The charge came through as marked: ECHST.NET, this was the first charge. Went to cancel through them since there wasn't a link through TeamSkeet. I was able to get a confirmation of cancellation on this. Next thing I know, I was receiving a charge from EPOCH for the site and the previous charges were never coming from there. Now, I will say that I do like EPOCH and the ease of being able to take care of billing independently, however this whole ordeal was a little absurd. Never was charged from the site previously under the billing label until the last one.
Overall, the site is unsure of what their identity is since the height of the pandemic. The usual sites under the basic subscription plan are all of sudden not updating as frequently since the focus seemed to have shift towards the "premium" sites, and most of those aren't updating regularly, or at all like some of the regular sites are. Also, they are becoming dependent on their partners to get them scenes to fill in the gaps where the normal sites would have gone. Not sure what is going on over there, but they need to figure some things out and get back to what made them a decent site.
|
11-23-21 04:14am
|
Reply
65
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
That's the biggest problem I see with all these third party discreet billing companies the sites go through is the no refunds policy. Every single site I have had has this as a thing, which is ridiculous. It's basically an implied statement saying that any purchase that happen is never at the fault of the supplier even though, like in your case, it was on customer services end by not completing the transaction or forgetting to click a button.
They seriously should reconsider revising that policy, especially if there is clear and obvious evidence to support customer claims.
I have had similar experiences to what you have had Wraith with other sites, and, in fact, this has had happened recently where they bounce my charges between two different billing services where I had confirmation on one and then switched the billing to another service and charged me again for the site after I confirmed cancellation.
|
11-22-21 05:13am
|
Reply
66
|
College Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Alybator's Review
How do you find all these niche sites? Compared to you, I feel like I have barely scratched the surface of what's out there and feel like a bit of a novice. lol
Have you found any scenes that are copies off of other sites that you have reviewed? I feel like that's more of a thing with some of the older scenes with some sites, but I wonder if that was a thing with newer content with the lesser known/visited sites that you have looked at.
Thanks for any input you have! I like reading your reviews!
|
11-21-21 09:51am
|
Reply
67
|
Naughty America VR
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
It looks like they have been marketing it for the VR videos only, but since I don't have a VR headset to tell you for sure, I can't say. All the new videos that are standard are in 4k. Not sure if that helps any, but that's all I know from my membership with them!
|
11-21-21 09:44am
|
Reply
68
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
The extra charges for downloads is a new thing. I first bought a membership to them on a yearly deal at $60 which then incrementally went up year after year for the duration of the 4 years I had them. I didn't notice the "pay more to download" thing until I started looking around at the other sites that were listed in the portal, and it didn't pop up until somewhere between the 2nd and 3rd year of my membership. At the time, I had Reality Kings, Babes, and Mofos with downloads and without extra payments. That became a thing after I signed up for Twistys, Digital Playground, and FakeHub. I did try to get Reality Gang in that first year, but it became a channel within the first month of doing that and they charged me twice for that.
In short, yes, I agree with you for the latter stages of the site and the price gouging and swindling of funds to get the buyer to dump cash into a site that has so many ways for taking your money.
The rating I gave was purely for the content that was available and not the customer service or pricing, but if I were to do that with more of a focus on those areas, then yes, I would probably give a rating that would be comparable to what you stated. If streaming is your thing, then I would suggest them, but if you must have your downloads, then look elsewhere for all sites that are not under the MindGeek umbrella.
|
11-21-21 07:55am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Thank you very much!
Definitely will be put to good use with the holidays coming up!
Congrats this month to Alybator and Marcdc on their wins too!
|
11-10-21 02:59pm
|
Review
70
|
Brazzers
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Updated: |
12-26-21 09:27am (Update History)
Reason: New Information Acquired from Full Access Trial Run
|
Pros: |
-Massive collection
-Wide range of niches
-HD daily updates (2 per day)
-Top stars in the industry represented
-Production quality
Brazzers simply is one of the best pay multisite company out there. A very large collection of works that is varied over the years of work is guaranteed to satisfy everyone who views them. There literally is a video for everyone to enjoy. Their collection goes way back to the mid-2000s with updates now daily to 2 videos, which is the norm for them before the pandemic.
The quality & production of the videos since 2015 has increased with the exception of the scenes that were available during the pandemic. It may not be a favorite, but Brooklyn Chase's scene, Hot Tub Titty Rub, is a favorite and an example of what I viewed as a start of the current trends of production you currently see today. |
Cons: |
-Recent change to UI is a little tricky at times to navigate
-It's 2021, and still no 4K updates?
-HQ Pics? Or screenshots?
Compared to the previous interfacing and navigation that was in operation a little over a year ago, this new interface is a little tricky and can leave one trekking around that learning curve. Once you get a hang of it, it's not that bad, however the searching feature could be a little better.
Yes. Still no 4k updates... Yet. With how the videos are done, I would hope to see 4k updates in the very near future.
The photosets went from comprehensive, to not so comprehensive, to a inconvenient thing that they had to have, to better quality with a mix of screenshots, to the standard of maybe 200-300 pics per set. Which is a shadow of their former selves with sets as numerous as 700+ in a single set. I do believe that a HQ pic set is complementary to the video and can even enhance it.
Also, they do have many scenes that have gone missing from their library. |
Bottom Line: |
Brazzers will remain the best for the time being, and I will recommend them for any user. However, with how things are moving with some of the newer scenes, and a handful that read this will disagree, but they might have hit a little lull and maybe plateaued. My rating has them on the edge of being top tier, however if I would have done this review a year ago, it would have been top tier. With the current trends, although good for the company, doesn't quiet say progressing excellence in porn. They have merely held consistent in their work and with how they have barred comments, limited photo sets, video downloads and quality aren't at 2021 standards, and large parts of their library have mysteriously gone missing, along with newer scenes randomly gone missing is keeping my rating from going over the top.
***Just an additional note to add and an adjustment to my score in light of additional information***
1.) Is the quality of the content still good enough to consider a membership? Yes. The content alone is still great. In fact, they have a current offer of one free week right now to take advantage of if you are looking at the fence you eventually will be sitting on.
2.) Additional charges for downloads. Yes. You will need to slap down more of your hard earned funds to keep the videos AND downloads. $15 per month or $100 per year. I was lucky to not have this when I originally had my subscription and was grandfathered in... Now I wish I would have kept it this whole time.
3.) You have to be a paying member just to watch the previews. They got rid of that capability some time ago, apparently, for those who were former members.
4.) Even if you don't have downloads paid for and stream only, the videos will have ads shoehorned into the videos promoting the other sites under the MindGeek umbrella of sites. Yeah, you read that right. Ads... Your enjoyment of the content will be hijacked by advertisements.
Hopefully, the additional information provided here will help with your purchase decision. Best to know what you are getting into before being surprised and frustrated with what you get. |
|
11-09-21 04:44pm
Replies (16)
|
Reply
71
|
5K Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
egor81's Comment
I would have to agree with you on the logout issues. That's a serious oversight the web developers overlooked and the complaints keep rolling in on this with no steps being taken to fix. I have never been a member of a site where it will logout while the user is actively using the site.
|
11-05-21 03:16am
|
Review
72
|
5K Porn
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
-High quality production of newer videos
-Finally expanding in finding different talent
-Highly stylized and erotic videos
-4k or higher video quality
There seems to be a changing of the guard with this site. More Euro talent is starting to be showcased, which is great. We could all use a little more of Josephine Jackson, Martina Smeraldi, and Mary Popiense. The site navigation is easy, but could be easier. And the quality of videos and pictures are really great, however in my opinion most of the trailers do a better job than the full videos. The style of videos are fantastic in the newer vids, but some of them can be overly dominated by blowjobs than actual sex. Quite frankly, viewers can get more out of the intro stripteasing that they have shifted to in them in spite of some of the continuity issues that can be spotted in the aesthetics. |
Cons: |
-Updates only once a week
-Some scenes are the same as Madison's other site
-Limited downloads per week
-Small range of video downloads if you want to collect
-Amount of content is limited, but growing... Slowly
The site only updates once a week, which during the height of the pandemic could have been a saving grace for the site since they were able to have content that didn't look like it was filmed from a low grade webcam like so many other sites were forced into doing. It does alternate updates between 5kTeens and 5kPorn, which is okay, but would like to see twice weekly updates instead.
In the earlier stages of the site, Ryan Madison is everywhere... And there's just something off about his style of sex that's very brutish and barbaric.
There is also a 15 downloads per week limit for the entire site. Not 15 per site. And to add, unlimited downloads for pictures and the handful of BTS videos... Yay... The lowest quality of video to download is at 720p. |
Bottom Line: |
For $20 in the first month, then $30 for the subsequent months, or if you want to go for $50 for 3 months, I'm not sure if it is completely worth the money or to relinquish a week's worth of groceries to get this membership. Yeah, sure, very high quality videos that look amazing on whatever viewing platform you want to choose (yes, I have casted the videos on my UHD tv and it does look amazing), however they only have reached into the European talent pool only recently. Which might be a saving grace for this site and 5kTeens, because watching Ryan hump girls into submission or until weird things happen is unbearable to watch and sometimes to comprehend. Plus, the download limits? If you want to keep the videos, great, you will need about four, maybe five, months worth of payments to do that at this point. To be completely honest, I only watched about maybe five videos out of the 135 (at the time) that were worth viewing. For whatever previews that were available, the trailers were of a higher "view-ability" than most of the other full-length videos, which is strange... The full videos should never be outdone by the trailers.
If you are a fan of Ryan Madison, great, go for it, and you might as well go for the other sites he has as well. I am more looking forward towards not seeing a site completely dominated by him and more of the current style of videos that are currently being done in the last half of a year. To me, the future productions look better, yet I will be guarded in reconsidering a membership again. |
|
11-03-21 03:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
73
|
Team Skeet
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
*New Girls to the Industry
*HD to 4K videos
*Very Large Content Collection
*Top Stars
*Premium Sites can be Bought "A-la-Carte" style
There are a number of multisite networks out there that can make the claim to always giving you the "newest talent" available. While in some cases this is true, TeamSkeet is one that can make this true claim by getting that talent early and showcasing them before the number of scenes start rolling up. The newer videos do have the option of have 4k viewing and downloading, along with decent photo sets to back up the video content. The oldest available content on the site dates back to 2005, which means these guys have been around the block a few times and with plenty to choose from. |
Cons: |
*Not every new video will be 4k
*Premium content will cost you an arm and a leg
*Not every site is updating or infrequent updates
*A slight download limit of 30 per 6 hours or so
Premium content... That's all. "Premium content" in this case would be just normal stuff for quite a few other sites that wouldn't cost you extra to view or have access to all the features you would expect to have. There is plenty to choose from with the base membership, however the content that is on the newer side is starting to become "experimental" and that equates to just weird in my book. The current trends in porn are forcing sites like this to change their formula, thus taking them away from what is considered their "bread and butter" content which is still great content compared to the new stuff. |
Bottom Line: |
I would say that this site is good/decent, but not the greatest. The customer service is really good, and by far the best I have yet to deal with. The content is starting to lean towards the "premium" side of things even though the content isn't exactly premium quality or are overdone ideas that other niche sites have decided to cornerstone. They do have a download "limit", but it's more like 30 downloads per 6 hours or so. And once you have reached your limit and then wait, the download speeds are severely hampered. The photosets are okay. The older scenes are better in this area. The "HQ" sets for a handful of scenes are merely just screen captures to go along with the other screencaps they have with the scene. As of right now, it is also hit or miss with 4k scenes. Overall, college aged girl porn is your thing, then this is the site for you. They definitely try to get new girls before they become "big," and it's just enough to get your apatite wet for teen porn. |
|
10-26-21 04:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
74
|
NF Busty
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
*Top big tit pornstars
*HQ pics in various d/l sizes
*HD Videos
*Newer vids in 4K |
Cons: |
*Not a wide selection
*Not very many niches or variations |
Bottom Line: |
Big tit lovers can rejoice as this site definitely caters to those who can't get enough of heavy chested women showing off their best assets and sexual prowess. Style-wise from a stylistic cinematic and pornographic perspective, the majority of the scenes they have released are very well done and sensual. The sensuality aspect is an area that both men and women can joy separately and as couples. Big tit porn should always have a place in anyone's collection, because let's face it, big tits are just fun to watch bounce.
One minor thing that could be a setback for the site is that this site has only been around since 2017, and still has a very small collection of scenes. This could be that they only release updates for this site once every fortnight. The site could benefit from a weekly scene release schedule to be competitive with other sites that are in the same niche.
This site is part of the Nubiles group of sites, however each one of those sites will require their own payment to gain access. For now, there are not any download restrictions, and because of this and the small collection and if you like to download everything for posterity, the entire collection can be downloaded in a day, if you have the time and same can be said for all the other sites within this network.
Overall, the quality of the videos and pictures are very well done. The stylization of the videos is something that can be viewed as an enjoyable art form of sex rather than something to help relieve sexual tension. I would recommend this to anyone, however if you want to have a large collection to choose from definitely give the site another year or two to grow or change their upload schedule. I would also wait for deals to be offered to help you get a taste of what the sites on this network are like if you are on the fence and just need and idea of what you would like and expect for value if you are worried about not get enough content for the amount that you would be spending if you were to go all in with purchasing multiple months. |
|
10-20-21 04:00am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
75
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
|
10-03-21 09:08am
Replies (1)
|
|