| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
301
|
Cum Brushers
(0)
|
|
03-26-08 08:14am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
302
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Well said...I think some of these guys that give 99 Ratings need to put their 'pud' away before writing reviews. Plus they need to read a bit about writing reviews...
|
03-25-08 12:06pm
|
Reply
303
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
baddaddie's Review
99? Slow down cowboy? I see your excitement but a 99? That's saying the site is dam near perfect. Put your 'pud' away before writing reviews. I've been a member previously and I can't quite say it was all that great?
|
03-25-08 11:59am
|
Reply
304
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Thanks forr commenting...hopefully others will be warned before joining. 150 GB LOL you killed them for sure
|
03-22-08 04:06am
|
Reply
305
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Thank you for your response from the staff at Pornusers. Of course I'm not looking for some police on what adult sites to join. I believe all memebers can decide which sites to join on their own. Memeber input is of great value, which we all can agree on? True? De-listing a site? Absolutely not. I agree 100% to never do a de-listing? I believe members should be heard and all postings should be posted.
The fact that your site says 'Links' give a no cross-sells and still maintian a discounted price for PU users' is still a bit troubling. Look at your past postings.
What about everyone else who searches your sister site or other sites? Is this not a wink to the site in question that it's okay?
I would like PU to say out front that they disappove of all sites that practice un-wanted CC billing. And ID those sites that do it?
Isn't this the type of information we all seek?
|
03-20-08 07:04pm
|
Reply
306
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Reply
"We were able to get scam free links to their sites. From the user perspective t this comment should be scary for all PU members? Other comments. 'We (meaning Mangement at PU) are glad to get clean links." My question is: what about all the other people getting unwanted CC Charges? Are they fair game?
Your words Vegas Ken.
Just the words 'scam free' is troubling not even commenting on the other responses? Is this how PU mangement really thinks?
|
03-20-08 06:23pm
|
Reply
307
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
What you need to understand is a basic fact: Companies such as the one in question made a very open decision to implement these unwanted charges. It was not a 'computer error' someone at their organization signed off on charging memebers unwanted excess CC Billing, making it very difficult for the person to disput these unwanted charges and I'm sure a bit embrassing to disput. RB, if you where a victim you'd be very upset I'm sure. True?
Guilt by Association? Much the opposite. I created a forum, regardless of how hard it may seem. Other members will read accordingly and see I voiced a unwanted billing problems that many have experienced to great discomfort. I don't believe other members will think I was grouping them in 'guilt of association' and be glad I was so vocal. Other PU members are free to read and make their own adult opinion. I've commented and made replays accordingly to all fellow members.
|
03-20-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
308
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thank you for your Replay. PLZ read my response to RaggingBuddist.
If anything, Pornusers give us a voice. I understand a poor rating because the site is just poor. If the owners read the remarks, maybe they make business changes to market their site better. That is a goal to make sites more erotic by our input at PU? But flat out over charging from domestic or foreign adult web sites, well I just have to hammer down hard. Like any other product we expect quality not trouble with credit card billing and false advertisement. In short, I tend to get my "Irish" up when it comes to taking peoples money and playing us as a fool. I will research a bit more in the future, but I'll call it like I see. No apolizes.
|
03-20-08 05:31pm
|
Reply
309
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I disagree with you on drama time. If Vegas Ken would have made a separate posting for all to see at Log-In, not deep in some Reply Posting, clarifing his orginal comment to Denner, yes some of my distrust and negativity could have been avoided.
Back on 1/11/2008 PU members began posting this issue with very $$$ expensive over billing. Vegas Ken should have been much more up-front in condeming this site and not wording his response as if they thought it was fine. In time, he addressed his remarks.
Overbilling and mis-representation is real issue with adult sites. My intention was to expose this 'normal business' practice of adding all type of unwanted charges and make members aware of caution.
In the future I will research all comments/replys before I state anything. In all respect, I want to be fair to both the adult sites and mangement of PU.
Thank you for your insight...
|
03-20-08 05:08pm
|
Reply
310
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Comment
Incredible Pass Network is in the business of systematically running a criminal enterprise. Yes I agree avoid at all cost....I just which the staff at PU understood what exactly is going on. The offer of clean links that I read on other comments and replys. Very troubling and very bad for PU management to be part of this.
|
03-20-08 01:16pm
|
Reply
311
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I'm at lost that someone from PU (Senior Staff) would endorse and worse yet seem happy that Incredible Dollars will no longer rip PU customers off , but everyone else is fair game. I seriously lost all respect for Pornusers management and especially Vegas Ken. Its almost as if their complacent with the owners of Incredible Dollars. I think the whole situation stinks.
By all rights and good business I think Vegas Ken should explain himself to PU Members not as a replay but as a separtate posting to clarify his remarks.
|
03-20-08 01:07pm
|
Comment
312
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
|
03-20-08 11:06am
Replies (20)
|
Reply
313
|
Foot Worship Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Review
Is this a non-nude site? Any zip files?
|
03-20-08 10:59am
|
Reply
314
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I have found the auto play videos usually to be of poor quality. I usually leave the site because the choice of video that the web master uses usually is a turn off. Some girl faking and screaming...please
|
03-20-08 10:57am
|
Reply
315
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Thanks it's on my short list. I love XXX hardcore so this should be good
|
03-19-08 10:32am
|
Reply
316
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually take time off from porn in the summer. I get so busy doing other stuff that I really don't have time. Plus it nice when I do get back into it, my fav sites have lots of new material.
|
03-19-08 10:31am
|
Reply
317
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
I have no idea what you talking about...
|
03-17-08 09:18am
|
Reply
318
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
I have a monthly budget for entertainment and porn.
|
03-17-08 09:15am
|
Reply
319
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
I was very interested in this site. I read the down falls...what about the logo on the videos? Is it really that distractful? Love any feed back.
|
03-14-08 11:09am
|
Reply
320
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I need the reverse drug. My cock is hard too much.
|
03-14-08 07:15am
|
Reply
321
|
Bruno B
(0)
|
Reply of
Docloveless's Comment
Another rip off site. Black list it.
|
03-13-08 09:15pm
|
Reply
322
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
chuck72061's Review
I avoid those all access sites their a rip off.
|
03-13-08 01:13pm
|
Reply
323
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
visor's Review
I loved the site when I joined awhile back. Its truely a lezzie site made by girls for girls. The photography was excellent and the videos where not bad. I found it very interesting, it was like peeking into what its really like being a fem bi or lesbian. The girls (models) truely liked to explore their bodies knowing that other girls are really interested in seeing them. There was a video of two girls chatting before their video shoot, the topic was cunny aroma and how they where comfortable with their partners being totally natural. I found that really interesting, I wish I downloaded it but I forgot and my memebership expired.
|
03-12-08 01:31pm
|
Reply
324
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
The lack of video's in a minus for SS...but worth visting once a year for the pics
|
03-10-08 08:04am
|
Reply
325
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Marianna's Poll
my lady friend loves to give me a BJ when I'm viewing porn ...
|
03-08-08 04:30am
|
