| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
426
|
Slaves In Love
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- maledom/femsub submission and sex;
- in most cases both male and female models seem to enjoy it, so "Slaves In Love" is not just a name;
- creativity; most clips are real videos with a story behind;
- stills/video quality is quite good;
- one of masters/owner seems to be professional composer, so music in clips is outstanding. |
| Cons: |
- more than half of updates are stills-only (no video);
- less updates compared to kink.com sites (such as sexandsubmission); still ok though. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the very few decent sites originating from Russia; video clips are in Russian but with subtitles in English. It seems that originally it was created by a composer guy (which explains role of music in some clips), but currently I'm not sure he's also with the site (would be a pity).
Usually they create very intimate and really loving atmosphere, with masters using BDSM implements not as a tool to abuse, but more as a tool to reach mutual excitement (though recently they got a new master which is a bit more into abusing his slaves; not exactly my cup of tea, but overall they're still very loving).
More than a half of updates are stills-only, but the rest are parts of pretty long stories with real (obviously, BDSM-oriented) script behind; scripts are usually extremely well-thought (and IMO create better storyline than, say, costumed porn videos by Private - and it says a lot).
Bottom line: highly recommended for lovers of Safe, Sane and Consentual BDSM niche (opposed to sites simulating rape and violence). |
|
10-17-07 01:48am
Replies (4)
|
Review
427
|
Small Tits Hunter
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ young chicks in hardcore action
+ chicks are cute
+ video quality is better than average
+ easy navigation
+ "one big clip" download
+ access to Jerk-Off Pass network (27 more sites)
+ CCBill as card processor |
| Cons: |
- not much content
- somewhat boring
- only vidcaps as pics
- most likely not many updates (as with other sites of the same network)
- could be just fragments from movies (so it's not exclusive) - see comments/reviews for DirtyBabysitters
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts. |
| Bottom Line: |
Here goes yet another review of Jerk-Off Pass network site. SmallTitsHunter is a newer addition to this network and quite a decent one I should add.
Theme of the site is about young-looking girls, who usually indeed have quite small tits :-). As site is new, there are only 10-15 episodes. As usual for the Jerk-Off Pass sites, clips are 20-30 min length, all within advertised theme. Cameraguy work and lighting are way above average, which is somewhat negated by typical for this netork "very average" encoding. Cameraguy work is so good that it raises question if it is just scenes from movies (see pat362's comment on DirtyBabysitters site of the same network). As with other sites of the same network, you shouldn't expect too many updates. On this site pics are vidcaps only.
Bottom line: this site is hardly worth it's price primarily due to very small amount of content and expected infrequent updates (though content quality is pretty good), but as a part of Jerk-Off Pass network with 27 other sites it can be worth a try. |
|
01-07-08 03:47am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
428
|
Society SM
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Well, let's hope they will hear you :-).
|
05-16-08 10:48am
|
Reply
429
|
Society SM
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
> even 2 scenes per week would be a great improvement
Sure it would be, but (taking into account that NOBODY does it for this niche) is it realistic to expect it? Among other things, it would increase their cost 2-fold but will it bring them 2x more customers? I doubt so.
|
05-16-08 10:34am
|
Reply
430
|
Society SM
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Review
> it really bombed out on update frequency
IMHO once per week is definitely not bad for this kind of content. Same SexAndSumbission and FuckedAndBound you're referring to have 1 update per week too (SexAndSumbission sometimes gives "BONUS UPDATES" out of schedule but they're as they sound - irregular bonus updates once in a while). Or "Society SM" has it less frequent than once a week?
|
05-16-08 08:59am
|
Reply
431
|
Spicy Roulette
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
I deny any responsibility in the matter ;-).
|
01-29-10 05:19am
|
Reply
432
|
Spicy Roulette
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Obviously it's a critical question, sorry that I didn't mention it in review (got used for this stuff to be covered by TBP :-)); I was able to find 8 games on the site, each about an hour of video. For me even $30 they're asking for is not THAT much for such original content, but obviously opinions can vary :-). There are 2 bonus sites thrown in too (MyDrFeelGood and PrivateHandjobs), but I cannot comment on them.
|
12-28-09 04:22am
|
Review
433
|
Spicy Roulette
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+++ unique idea, with supposedly unscripted action
++ one of the very few sites which play around "strip poker" ("strip roulette", and so on) theme
++ special thanks for sexual "truth or dare"
+ action starts from undressing, and progresses to pretty wild sex
+ models mostly behave believable
+ lots of reasonable and supposedly unscripted dialogs between models (which improves 'reality' feeling)
+ 'girl-next-door' models which adds to 'reality' feeling
+ decent video quality
+ several video formats
+ no pre-checked cross-sales (YMMV) |
| Cons: |
-- probably at least somewhat scripted
-- site is quite small (8 episodes, 1 hour each)
- game rules are not posted
- regularity of updates is unclear
- 3rd-party ads on a paysite?? |
| Bottom Line: |
Being a big fun of sex games in all varieties, and having spent lots of time on finding this unusual stuff, I was pleasantly surprised with SpicyRoulette (I assume it is a very new site, it wasn't even listed on TBP before I've asked for it). IMHO it is a very decent site along the same lines as now discontinued DareRing, but without most of it's deficiencies.
The idea is very simple, they have people take certain random actions in turn, and actions are along the lines of classical "Truth or Dare" with a strong sexual twist. It looks very good, with supposedly unscripted interactions between models, and after a while culminates in an all-out orgy.
So far so good. On the second thought, it makes me a bit suspicious about scripting it. If '0' on roulette means 'all players participate in massive 69', then what would have happened if '0' would come out in the very beginning of the game? My feeling is that there is at least some scripting involved, which isn't too bad, but creates certain negative feeling for me. Still, for the funs of real strip truth or dare (like myself), it is IMHO by far the best site out there.
As it is not described on TBP yet, a few words about technical side: videos are HD 1280x720, WMV 5MBps (there is also a low-res WMV option); there are also MPEG-4 and iPod versions (though iPod wasn't too good); Flash preview is also available.
Pictures are IMHO good (though I'm not an expert in pictures, so please take it with a grain of salt :-)), with most of them of quite strange resolution of 1600x1067, and ZIP-ped download available.
Bottom line: great idea and reasonably good implementation make it a VERY good (and long-needed) successor to DareRing. I would expect it to be an interesting try for anybody interested in videos of real people playing computerless sex games. |
|
12-28-09 01:39am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
434
|
Squirting Pie
(0)
|
|
05-15-08 06:20am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
435
|
Stephanie Cane
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Comment
FWIW: for me it also opens cing.com.
|
05-03-11 08:31am
|
Reply
436
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> everything is rubbish i have seen until now :(
Exactly my point :-(.
|
06-16-08 06:41am
|
Reply
437
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> are the games playable
No.
> and is ther a video strip poker content?
Not sure what exactly you mean, but I think site doesn't have videos at all.
> do you know a good site withe strip poker content?
Finding attractive girls strip-dancing on video is a challenge these days :-(. Finding it in "strip poker" setting is even bigger challenge :-((. Please let me know if you know/find some.
|
06-16-08 06:17am
|
Review
438
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- original concept; pretends to be "real reality" (with no script) but frankly I'm not 100% convinced
- variety of games
- quality is ok
- cameraguy work is quite good |
| Cons: |
- I'm not 100% convinced that it is not scripted;
- undressing only
- photos only
- site design is pretty poor |
| Bottom Line: |
These guys seem to promote the idea of softcore specifically distancing themselves from hardcore; they're part of a bigger initiative to promote softcore (but "NO PORN") described on KeepItNice.com.
Overall, the site produces very mixed feelings; while the concept is very good, you need to be a really big fan of girls undressing and playing games while half-dressed or in nude to overcome 'undressing only' and 'stills only' issues. On the other hand, if they would add videos, personally I could try to join them back. |
|
10-17-07 03:06am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
439
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
> From signing up for ANY more sites for the next 9 months.
IMHO one site (regardless how poor it is) is NOT worth giving up completely for such a long time (after all, there are tons of decent sites out there). Just my humble opinion though.
|
10-18-07 01:48am
|
Comment
440
|
Sweet Asian Teens
(0)
|
|
05-15-08 03:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
441
|
Sweet Asian Teens
(0)
|
|
05-15-08 03:41pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
442
|
Swingers At Play
(0)
|
|
11-09-07 08:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
443
|
Swingers At Play
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ unique concept
+ real swingers
+ girls next door for those who like it
+ game ideas are fun
+ one-time payment option |
| Cons: |
- not convinced that they play for real
- clips are in Russian with no subtitles
- not clear whether site is updated
- no ZIP download
- lighting and cameraguy work is amateurish
- sound track disappears from time to time |
| Bottom Line: |
I would like to say that their tour page doesn't really make them justice, but unfortunately it does - inside it's as dull as outside. It feels as a kind of abandoned site - it is not clear when there was last update, and whether there will be the next one. Still, at the price (by the way, there is a one-time subscribing option) you'll get 15 games, each with 15-20 minutes of unique content, and if it would be really good content, it still could be rather good deal, but here is where real problems start.
Idea is good and games could be fun, but overall feeling is not good: in part because of poor editing and breaks all the time, in part because it is spoiled for those who can't understand the language (supposedly Russian), in part because players sometimes aren't able to follow their own rules (at least as they're described on site), and go down to outright orgy pretty soon.
Quality of videos is formally decent (640x480x1100kBit/s), but is definitely spoiled by lack of proper lighting, cameraguy work and post-editing (which doesn't seem to be present at all); overall, looks very amateurish.
Bottom line: could be worth trying if you can understand Russian; otherwise even for as hardcore fun of sex games as I am, it is not worth the trouble or money. |
|
10-30-07 05:05am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
444
|
Taste My Own Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Not going into discussion on personal tastes (personally I don't care much about A2M), I want to comment on "clang of iron". There were times when producing (and even watching) of ANY porn would have caused to hear the clang of iron; for some reason I don't really miss that times :-). So my personal motto is: "I don't care as long as all the activity is consensual activity between consenting adults". If somebody wants to see eating shit and somebody wants to produce this kind of stuff - I don't care though I think it's REALLY disgusting; it is outlawed in certain places, but I think laws prohibiting it should be thrown away (which already happened in many - but not all - places to other laws outlawing such things as anal sex or being gay). Why somebody (especially government) should care about things that happen between consenting adults?
|
12-11-07 06:20am
|
Reply
445
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Good idea, but it can possibly help only if somebody really reads e-mails (which is not guaranteed :-( ).
|
11-22-07 03:28am
|
Reply
446
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
You really think that you'll get better support for $10 site? I REALLY doubt it. Adult site support stinks regardless of price, that's it :-(.
|
11-21-07 08:47am
|
Reply
447
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
!#*!&^@!*&^! I hate sites with non-existing support :-(. Unfortunately, in adult most of the sites are like that :-((.
|
11-21-07 07:50am
|
Reply
448
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
And what does their support say?
|
11-21-07 06:04am
|
Reply
449
|
The English Mansion
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveWebslave's Reply
> Frankly, what you personally think I have the right to do or mention is completely irrelevant.
It is indeed very relevant to this site that you should comply with your own privacy policy, and I'm not sure your posts here are in compliance. What you did post may (or may not, depending on jurisdiction and other factors) constitute "individual user personal information", which your site claims to protect.
> When somebody blatently lies in a public forum and slanders a
> reputeable business,
And what exactly this "blatant lie" was? That you didn't issue refund? You agreed yourself it's truth. That he's unsatisfied customer? I tend to trust him on this one. So could you please mention what was the alleged lie?
> the truth should be aired and I have every right to state the
> absolute truth.
Do you really pretend to know what the absolute truth is?
|
10-30-07 10:25am
|
Reply
450
|
The English Mansion
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveWebslave's Reply
> no, we would not refund somebody who joined our site, downloaded a gallery, then said they didn't like it
It means that all the references to Josh's e-mails are completely irrelevant, so I'm not even sure that you did have a right to mention such potentially sensitive information in public forum (especially as in this case you seem to be bound not only with publicly available privacy policy, but also with your contractual obligations with JoshP).
Bottom line: as I've already said, my understanding is that support did an extremely poor job in handling this situation. Furthermore, I'm sure that allowing refunds in such cases of 'hate on the first glance' (sure, not after user downloaded 20G of content) would be beneficial for all the parties involved.
|
10-30-07 08:23am
|
