| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
> But chasing gold has never made for a better human being.
Sometimes gold comes out as a nice side effect of efforts to change this world. As you're RagingBuddhist, changing the world is probably contrary to your principles too, but sometimes it changes the world to the better :-). Moreover, someone chasing gold can change the world to the better even without aiming it. I think Bill Gates is one such example; despite my negative (to put it mildly) opinion on him (his business practices back 10 years ago were really atrocious), I should admit that he has made substantial contribution towards Internet culture and associated freedom of communication and knowledge.
|
12-06-07 05:15am
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
giants, did you mean "to watch" or "to do"? These are different things for me :-).
|
12-05-07 02:53am
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
+1
|
12-05-07 02:50am
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
What THEY say is that it is not a wallet, but something that the guy has achieved in life (with money being one of achievements - if they're not inherited but earned). The bad thing is that they don't know themselves how much of it is about achievements and how much is about hard cash :-).
|
12-05-07 02:46am
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> Uhhhhh, size of what? My wallet?
In certain cases size of wallet can be a good substitute :-).
|
12-04-07 04:07am
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
> trying to convince women that this |-----------------------------------| is seven inches.
No problem to convince them about it - you just need a font (or monitor) big enough :-).
|
12-03-07 09:44am
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I don't think it will happen this way. IMHO it is driven mostly by customer's opinion and models won't be able to change anything :-(. For each one going condom-only there will be ten willing to do condomless.
|
11-30-07 01:44am
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Poll
I've put 'Epoch' because of BlacksOnBlondes form with 2 pre-checked "free 1 day trial auto-renewable at $20/month" checkboxes (see my comment on BlacksOnBlondes for details). No other negative experiences with processors (it's funny, but my experiences with non-adult CC processors are MUCH worse than with adult ones).
|
11-29-07 02:36am
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'd still say that it is necessary to start doing something. Unfortunately, I have no idea what exactly can be done :-((.
|
11-28-07 01:40am
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> I guess it starts with you, me and others out there to suggest that porn movies should be all condom.
The problem is to bring this message to the public and producers :-(.
|
11-27-07 02:38am
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> Anyway one down, one to go.
:-). Thanks a lot, it will help.
Question to admins: given this discussion, don't you think it is a good idea to have separate (from sites) rating/comments of credit card processors? Might be difficult to implement, but should be very useful for this community. Or at least to make another type of "rating" poll (with ratings) and make the first such poll about credit card processors?
|
11-27-07 02:04am
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Reply
> But think it would be great if you submited yours too, you might have a better angle on it with "the WORST" processor.
Submitted, let's see if it comes out.
|
11-26-07 12:09pm
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Reply
> That would be an interesting topic for next poll.
You're right; will you submit it yourself or want me to do it? (to fit it into current poll system, I'll probably make it something like "Which CC processor do you think is the WORST?")
> Myself, I allways see it as a big plus if a site is ccbill caus i never had any problems with them
Ditto.
|
11-26-07 04:12am
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Please shout LOUDLY if you recognize them (maybe in site comments?). It's really important to know who's who in this business.
|
11-26-07 04:08am
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> This technique has nabbed two "unscrupulous" sites that rebilled after I cancelled a subscription (it was not ccBill, by the way)
Wow, and can you tell which processors were involved (it is processor which is of interest here)?
|
11-26-07 02:39am
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Completely agree. Plus condom-only porn would play an important role in educating people (especially young ones) to use condoms in their private lives. The only minor thing left is to make it happen :-(.
|
11-26-07 02:25am
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> I think you'd agree that none of us eat it straight from the source
It's not exactly "straight from the source" either; IMHO, getting it from other guy's poorly washed hands via handshake differs only in quantity, and I have no idea if this difference in quantity makes difference from medical point of view.
> The industry probably doesn't want this kind of information made public.
Come on, this is not the industry where I'd expect conspiracy (they're not tobacco companies after all :-)). More likely doctors just cannot imagine that somebody in sane mind will do it (unlike A2P, which they warn about).
|
11-26-07 02:20am
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
And about condoms and STDs - here I agree that it is definitely a risk, but... that's the way people like to see it and until it changes, I don't think industry will go for condomless porn.
|
11-24-07 07:44pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> To them I say you eat shit and then tell me you feel OK
Strictly speaking, some very small amounts of shit get into people mouths all the time (it's not sterile world after all), and the only difference between this and eating shit is that of amounts, with A2M somewhere in between (don't forget that models wash themselves very thoroughly before doing it). So without any medical opinion (doctors don't rush to advise on it, unlike A2P) I still have no idea if it's really dangerous.
|
11-24-07 07:17pm
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> he fact is that wearing one would be beneficial to the male performer's health only, since he'd be proctected but the female would still be doing atm.
Most of A2M on the market is "ass to the same girl mouth", so it would indeed help with STDs, and I don't know if A2M itself poses any risk (A2P does, but no idea about A2M).
> Far too many performers catch a variety of STD's
Do you have any statistics on it? I've heard about one quite big case somewhere in US, that's it.
> I'm actually curious to know how many people have a problem between condom and bareback sex. That might be an interesting poll.
There was such a poll back in March; only 25% of people have said "I have no issue with condoms".
|
11-24-07 10:14am
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> anything that puts a performers life in danger, is simply unaceptable to me.
Hm, I'd say that condomless porn puts performers life in danger more than A2M (not sure about A2P). Not that I'm a big fan of A2M myself, but your argument doesn't look too viable to me.
> What's the next fetish???
I agree that there should be a line drawn somewhere. And about the next fetish: I think that from softer to harder it goes like this:
softcore - oral - vaginal - anal - a2m - 'golden showers' - ...
So I've just submitted another poll asking the same questions about 'golden showers'; if it's accepted, we'll see how many people are into it (I don't think there will be much, but let's see).
|
11-24-07 02:03am
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
TBP "Search niche" feature is a nice one (and it's a pity it doesn't exist in PU). Still, IMHO the very need for it illustrates that plain list of 94 items is useless, as it is very difficult to look through it to find what the user needs.
And disbalance is a bad thing exactly for this reason: the more garbage (which almost nobody's is interested in - see 'Balloons') you have at top level, the less useful it becomes for everybody else.
On the other hand, I don't think it makes sense to argue as you're already sure that it is done the best possible way, so could you please just add 'Search niche' feature to PU?
|
11-19-07 02:39pm
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Ok, it's just another argument for subcategories: probably it should be like:
- Solo models
--- Masturbation
--- Dildos
--- Naked only
- Legs&Nylon
--- Pantyhose
--- Stockings
--- Foot fetish
...
Deal? :-)
|
11-19-07 05:25am
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> when i look for other things like mastrubating women or stocking
What about 'Solo Models' (what else they will do then masturbate? :-)) and 'Legs & Nylons'? So they ARE there :-), just worded differently, and I cannot blame you for not finding them, as carefully reading list of 94 items is frustrating at the very least. So the reason why you didn't find them is exactly because there are way too MANY of the niches (if there would be less B/S like Balloons, it would be easier to look through niche list and find things) :-). Subcategories (which I'm voting for) would also help it BTW.
|
11-19-07 05:01am
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> there can`t be enough "filtering" :)
What about "Balloons"? If all the niches will be 8 sites in size, like Balloons or a few others, there will be several thousands of niches, and I'd say it will be way too much of filtering; don't you agree?
|
11-19-07 04:25am
|
