Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of porn's most prominent studios. A long-history of porn with a plot and parodies of mainstream movies plus you get their celebrity collection if you're into that.
- They have started allowing downloads.
- I'm confident that every major porn star (prior to 2010) has at least one scene on here.
- Navigation is pretty good, it has to be or else I would lower the score a lot for the hassle the site puts up.
- Though it might not look like it, there are full DVDs here, you just have to search by title to find all the scenes for each.
- I'm going to put this with a slight asterisk, download speed has been very good but I downloaded a couple of the older scenes earlier and wasn't even getting half my regular download speed, possibly on a different server?
- This is a strange pro but there's lots of non-facial cumshots!
- Major stars have lots of content and short-lived Vivid stars do as well. April Flowers has 51 scenes, I didn't know she filmed that many scenes.
Cons:
- Oh for fuck's sake, could you figure out how to squeeze one more ad onto the site? No joke, there are 16 individual ads on a page, most are chat models, others are for Vivid penis pills and one huge one at the top of the screen about how to get 120 free chat tokens. To put this all into perspective, this is on a model's page. It shows 8 equal sized scenes by the model with 16 ads.
- The rarely seen SBW biller, seems easy enough to cancel but haven't seen them in years.
- While it doesn't bother me, scenes have been removed from the stream-only days. For me, there's enough of the classic content to offset this but definitely some are missing.
Bottom Line:
Tired of watching loud-mouthed guys who sound like squealing pigs when cumming? Try some Vivid! Back to the days of Tom Selleck mustaches, old-school Oakley blade sunglasses and Zubazz pants. Call it cheesy but the women and action are hotter than today's porn.
Two girls with a guy and one girl dodges the cumshot? Not here. One of the favorite hobbies of Vivid watchers is to see how often the would-be dodger gets hit on the cheek by a cumshot aimed at the other woman's mouth. April Flowers, just known as April on here is one of my favorite porn actresses of all-time. She's a Latina who lied about her race because Latina wasn't a genre in the late 90s, early 2000s, she even used the April Flowers and April Rain name to try not to show her Latina background. The only problem was her Latina backside couldn't help but show as she wiggled, grinded and twisted it to humble every man Vivid threw at her. As the old saying goes, she didn't even look the part. One of those cum dodging threesomes features April and a younger Raylene than current porn fans know. Raylene supposedly loved having cumshots on her belly and boobs, April wasn't feeling the scene since she was mostly just watching, she's laying there and the cumshot hits her chin and arm. According to lore, she filmed the "Marissa" scene the next day and made the guy cum four times. Maybe that's what made the late 90s, early 2000s Vivid porn so good?
April, Kobe Tai, Asia Carrera, Taylor Hayes, Raylene, Shelbee Myne, Charlie, Charlie Angel, Sky Lopez, a very young Belladonna and Zara White, just off the top of my head, seemed to be constantly competing with each other. You got nearly perfect performances from them in every scene.
I joined this site back about 5 years ago to get the scenes the Vivid channel on Videobox didn't have but it was stream only. One of my all-time favorite DVD series is "The Watcher", it's what it says, a voyeur watches two or more people have sex. It was revolutionary for its time (90s-2000s). One of the more memorable scenes was Charlie and some guy sneaking into a prison, they start to have sex and this guy appears, just watching, it seemed to kick Charlie into another gear. They still have those on here for download. Those alone are worth the price.
But also being able to download scenes of my favorites who I haven't seen content of for download is a huge plus too.
As impressed as I am with the content that is available, there's a chunk of content missing too. I don't see it as a huge negative simply because I'm happy to just get these scenes I hadn't been able to download.
In my pros I said the navigation is pretty good and it is. How else could you find anything among the ads? The model search works but that always falls back on the person knowing who they're looking for. Doing DVD title searches also works but again, you have to know what you're looking for.
After that, the navigation is bad. And the site layout plays into that. They've also taken liberties with renaming models. April Flowers is no longer that, she's just April. Raylene's various last names have been removed as have Charlie's which makes it confusing because there's also a Charlie Angel, the name Charlie sometimes used except it was Charlie's Angel.
Navigation also makes it very hard to come up with a definitive number of scenes. They have as many as 20 on title searches and there's no numbers on how many pages there are. Instead, you just click an arrow and it loads the next 20. All of this could be improved. Throw in the old biller and the 2 pre-selected cross-sales with 2 more upsale ads showing up before allowing me into the member's area and these things alone are taking 10 points off the score.
Many of these scenes are nearing 20 years old. They have a 1080p download option on all. They also have a 720p and SD option. I downloaded some 1080p of April's old scenes and the properties say 1920x1080 but they're not. For one, the scenes are 4:3, so there's a black box around each side and for two, the bitrates on the 1080p are only in the 4,000 range. Before throwing them under the bus, these do look better, cleaner than the Vivid Classic scenes I have from Videobox. So, maybe they've done all they can with them and that's good enough for me. You can even see in the filesizes (most 1080p at 500-600 MB), that these are not 1080p scenes.
Still, where are you going to get these great scenes? I've been through a lot of porn, moving it, deleting it but I've never deleted a single scene from my Vivid folder. One last warning is the site is overwhelming with the ads, the questionable search, so I do think if they cleaned up all these site layout and navigation problems they would have a really great site. As it is, for collectors and curious ones, it's a great find. A couple of longtime favorite scenes: April and Raylene in House of Lies #3, April and Raylene again in Bad Wives #2 and the aforementioned April in Marrisa.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the very best all-around network on the internet.
- Comes with 13 sites, and those 13 sites include at least 8 sites that at one time were successful standalone sites. Eight of the sites are still updating and 5 are fairly listed as "Archive" sites.
- The navigation in its newest iteration blows other networks away. Will further in BL.
- Download speeds are very good, about 70% of my max.
- Averages a new update per day across the network.
- The amount of content across the network is reaching hard to believe levels.
- Ready for this one? Over 2,500 models. And some have over 100 scenes.
- DDF, the producer Denys DeFrancesco, helped create "Leg sex" and is one of the most copied producers and photographers in internet porn history.
- The network itself covers nearly every genre. It's the closest I've seen to complete.
- House of Taboo is maybe the best mainstream accessible kink/BDSM site on the internet and it's included.
Cons:
- Two checked cross-sales sit directly over, "Yes, I am 18".
- Being used to American porn can cause a slight problem here since most of the models don't speak English. The good side to that is the men aren't talking at all in the scenes.
Bottom Line:
There really isn't much at all to complain about here. I've evaluated my last 10 years of porn sites and can say this one easily is in my top 3. I like several of the American networks but DDF has consistently been working on their navigation and for me they've hit a good spot with it. Navigation on a site this large is very important.
I'm going to get the numbers out of the way since they're distracting.
- 2543 models
- 15,161 scenes, each scene comes with a video and zipped photos.
That's a lot of porn. I always thought DDF's biggest strength could also be seen as their biggest weakness. They have variance in their network sites. When you look at most networks the sites really aren't that different, they change a setting, add a few twists to the storyline and call it a different site. The DDF network isn't like that. You have sites that still focus on solo girls, posing, teasing, masturbating. Then they have a couple of lesbian sites. Throw in a couple of hardcore sites. And a kink/BDSM site.
I think for DDF's experience to be understood, one has to consider how successful these sites were as standalone sites. I know at one time, on PU's parent site TBP, three of the sites included here were in the top 10 of overall review scores. I can tell you I paid $29.95 for One By Day, for Hot Legs and Feet and for Euro Girls on Girls. I don't remember what the standalone price was for Eve Angel Official but I paid whatever it was.
I do think that separates it from the American networks. And if it's not known, you can actually still join the sites in DDF Network by themselves for a reduced price.
I can't say I've ever really liked Hands on Hardcore but that's mainly because at this point, I really don't like most hardcore.
The archive sites should be mentioned since these are most likely aimed at collectors. They include Cherry Jul, Sex Video Casting, Eve Angel Official, Sandy's Fantasies and Hairy Twatter. Sandy's Fantasies for those who are curious is the lovely Zsanett Egerhazi aka Sandy from Club Sandy. This content of Sandy is from the earlier years of her career and features one of the most viewed Euro lesbian sets of all-time, it's Sandy vs Sophie Moone, two of the most popular Euro models of the Euro porn boom in the mid-2000s. They were also a part of the group that I once called, "The no take dick six". That name came from watching multiple interviews of Eve Angel, Sandy, Sophie, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone and Peaches. Their English or lack thereof led most to answer, "What's the most you'll do on video?" with, "No take dick, no, no."
While I'm having fun at their expense, they were the models who interested me the most. I couldn't understand how 6 European models who were from Hungary could have that much power over their scenes.
And if you like them, they have over 500 scenes just of those 6.
The big change that led the network to a 98 is the navigation. I don't think many people question the quality of content at DDF but the navigation has been really bad in the past. You could click something and end up on Google, bad redirect urls, dead links, it was terrible.
Now, as of 2/6/2018, you sign in to a hub. Across the top are the names of the still updating network sites. The hub itself shows all updates to the network. Say you want Hands on Hardcore. Click it and the hub reloads with only Hands on Hardcore content. Not good enough? Go directly to "sites" and pick your favorite, you now have a brand new search engine that will just search within that site's content. And you can just search through models and see all their content.
So, why the -2? I didn't put it in cons since it's a minor problem and not to make fun of DDF's tech group but every time they try to fix something, they break it! If you want to go to one of the archive sites you have to sign in one time. It doesn't move seamlessly to them like it does the active sites. That's pretty minor so I took 2 points off for those cross-sales and the biller is Vendo, who I haven't ever had a problem with but those cross-sales could easily be re-checked if trying to click the age consent.
Other negatives aren't worth taking points off like older content not being HD, that's accepted at this point and I'm afraid if we keep complaining about it they're going to start removing it.
Even with my high score, I don't join DDF Network more than twice a year. I mainly focus on the 1byDay, Hot Legs and Feet and House of Taboo content and have all the archived content already on a hard drive. I really think at least 4 of these sites deserve a standalone review but will probably limit it to 2-3 of them.
The active sites are: 1byDay, Euro Girl on Girl, House of Taboo, Hot Legs and Feet, DDF Busty, Only Blowjob, Hands on Hardcore and Euro Teen Erotica. There's still an emphasis on glam but it's why I just join twice a year. I still like glam to a point and they are shooting the best solo sets.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Quite possibly the longest-running solo model site on the internet. Earliest content is January 2003.
- Offers genre diversity that's usually not seen in a solo model site.
- Still updating but the updates are only 2-3 times a month.
- Navigation is okay as this is a large site but it could use some cleaning up.
- If you like big-boobed blondes you'll like Wifey.
- Download speeds are very good, right at 70-80% of my max speed.
- I would go as far as calling the content some of the most authentic I've seen.
Cons:
- I think this goes above the other cons. Everything could use an updating. The site, the navigation, the tabs and it could be made more efficient.
- The majority of scenes are of either Wifey and her husband or her husband and another woman. I think is probably hit or miss since if you really like Wifey it's a good thing. I do like her but only one solo model hasn't ever been able to get my full attention so the content does become repetitive.
Bottom Line:
It's hard to say too much negative about a model who has been in porn as long as Wifey has and it's probably risky to talk too much about how long that's been too! I'll start this review by saying I mean everything positive. There are no jabs at age.
I'm taking a slightly different route than usual because I think the negatives with this site kind of take away from the site. Starting with the wonky navigation and programming. On the main screen there are 5 tabs across the middle-top. Those are "Store", "Contact", "Friends", "Classics" and "Miscellaneous". I normally wouldn't even visit the store but for the review it shows scenes that can be bought for $19.95 each. No clue what the purpose is. The contact tab is emails to contact them at. Friends, to me, should be eliminated. I clicked on 6 different ones and instead of it being content to view, it takes me to the friends solo site. Classics has one scene in it. Miscellaneous has about 20-30 cartoon drawings and another tab for "sounds". Clicking sounds open a new page but it redirects back to the home page. That's 5 useless tabs to me. Up in the upper right hand side of the screen is Wifey's Blog which she still does update. Beside of it in the far-right margin is Wifey's Galleries. How can a site take up 75% of their space with tabs and content that most Wifey fans won't even look at? Of note, there are "video" and "photos" tabs under those useless 5 tabs but I didn't even notice them until 3 weeks into the membership. It seems that would only take basic changes to fix all that. Put Wifey's content right there in the middle.
Now that my OCDC is finished complaining there's the good parts. What you have with this site is what feels like something that started out innocent enough. The oldest content dates back to January 2003. I don't know which one came up with the idea of making a site as Wifey seems to love all aspects of it and her husband is benefiting like Ryan Madison (Kelly Madison's husband). I would compare the content to Kelly's sites.
I haven't watched every scene but every scene I have watched has both Wifey and her husband in it in some way. There are scenes that her husband has sex with other women. Scenes where she has sex with other men. But a large portion is her and her husband together. This leads to that second con. Eve Angel kept my attention for several years as a solo model but even Eve started to fade. To think Wifey has been doing this for 15 years is worth 5-10 bonus points. Not just because of the years but because she is still very attractive. She still has the same excited personality for sex. She's playful, even silly and that is why the bonus points are there. She comes across as very genuine.
Here's what she excels at: Dressing sexy, this is a lost art. I would even say dressing slutty. You can tell by her content and how she releases it that she really enjoys being pretty but not in an arrogant way. Exhibitionism, way back in her earliest content she's outside, out in public, flashing her huge boobs and showing excitement and arousal from it. She still does in her newest exhibitionist content. Handjobs/blowjobs, I'm combining those because she does. What seems to start as a handjob turns into a blowjob because of her excitement. Sex, I would compare her closely to Eva Angelina. Its not her best "skill" (that didn't feel right). But she gives a lot of effort and is down here just because the other skills are very good.
Amount of content as of 1/30/2018 is 590 videos and 602 photo sets. That's a lot of content for a solo model. The photo sets are available in downloadable zips. You also get most of the videos in 720p but there are no 1080p options on those and the oldest videos are 320p. I'm not taking much off for those since they are over 10 years old but did want to mention it.
This is where the review becomes more difficult. Is it worth a join? For me it is. I still have trouble finding newer porn that I really like and the first sites I joined 15 years ago were solo model sites. In most cases Wifey wouldn't be the type of model I'm into it. Her boobs are something like 38DD and I'm usually indifferent to boobs. She's slender which usually doesn't attract me either. She's blonde, that's not going to hurt much since I do prefer brunettes but her hair is pretty. She has a very 90s California look to her. I think she's from Oregon which is close enough. Convincing me she's genuine fixes everything. Her most genuine is when she's doing exhibitionism.
I would recommend it to those who are into exhibitionism. Those who are into solo models and don't need a lot of variety of models. I'll even say those who like handjobs. She's one of those models who you can tell really enjoys giving them. These are all pluses for me and makes this one of my favorite solo sites.
My uncle lived with us. We had this VCR that he acted like was a pot of gold. It was a Beta and he had 6-8 Beta porn tapes. Which is why it was a pot of gold. He didn't have any other porn and had to keep the Beta player protected to watch them on. Of course, once I figured this out he bribed me with full access to it anytime I wanted to use it if I didn't tell my mom.
This is in addition to my review. This network made me wonder how often someone monitors their ads. I currently have a Black Friday ad on it and a July 4th ad on it lol.
I decided to add this comment because I honestly started the review as a 58. I either thought I heard they were back to offering downloads or saw it in a promo but I was very disappointed to know I paid a near premium price for a site that doesn't offer downloadable videos. After I looked through their content, I realized this is fairly unique content, especially the public scenes. Back when I originally reviewed this network a lot of the sites now on it weren't around and I gave it a 93 back then. The more I thought about buying the $9.95 VIP access to get the downloads, I think the quality of the content made it not as big of a deal since it's only $9.95. All I could have done with that is join another cookie-cutter site. I believe it's worth the extra and really wonder if maybe this is the future?
If you had joined it and didn't like the look of the content once inside you wouldn't have to pay for the downloads. I personally don't like it and would just offer everything at one price. If they got rid of Pro-Biller (they won't) and didn't make members pay a second time for downloads, I really could see this network reaching 100. Hopefully, I can everything downloaded that I want in a month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that still is trying to reach its potential but is held back by poor management.
- They used to advertise 100% amateurs which wasn't true and while I don't recognize many of the newer models, I can't verify they are amateurs. I can say their shooting style makes you think the models are amateurs. It's not a putdown. They don't pile makeup on the models, a lot of sets have selfie-style pictures and the girls come off as normal girls not pornstars.
- 14 sites that have a niche they cover from lesbian, to bisexual girls sharing their boyfriend to the almost amateur I Know That Girl to public/outdoors. Good production values throughout.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Excellent picture sets that are downloadable and 2000 long end.
- Network as a whole averages over 1 update per day.
- Also, like the models mostly bringing an amateur feel, the settings, everything that goes into the scenes feels like everyday life instead of a porn shoot.
Cons:
- The important one. You have to pay $9.95 for VIP access or else the membership is the same as a limited trial membership. With the standard $19.95 membership you can look at any set and stream the videos but no downloads and maybe the funniest, you get VIP customer support when you pay the extra. As much as I wanted to drop a 58 on them, I don't plan on returning and I would think if a person likes their content enough they won't mind paying the extra $9.95. I do think they should lower their standard price to $9.95 if they're going to require you to pay again for downloads. I took 5 points off the score but could see it being a dealbreaker for some.
- As with any of the American-based networks there's a bunch of goofs talking in a lot of the scenes.
- Pro-Biller, cross-sales
Bottom Line:
Mofos has been one of my favorite networks for years. I like their style a little better than Reality Kings, Bang Bros, Brazzers, they create more of a reality feel than those sites and the models are some of the prettiest in the world.
Here's what you get with the $9.95 VIP upgrade: Access to over 2,000 Teen Pink videos, the ability to download all of Mofos content, VIP customer service, access to the Mofos Vault and some kind of stamp on your screenname if you post a comment.
I think it's worth it at least in my case. My entire Mofos collection was wiped out about 3 years ago. They have two public/exhibitionist scenes of Jynx Maze that I would pay $30 for. I do think it prices itself out of the recommend for anyone recommendation. For collectors who have a few favorite models it's easily worth it.
What Mofos does is take tried and proven methods of everyday girls (selfies, mirror pictures, etc) and has the model do things like those. It can at least help your brain get into fantasy mode. They also offer niches that aren't that common anymore. The sites you get with your membership are:
* = still updating.
Video Blog (130 scenes) - It's kind of like interviews except the models get nude and some play with themselves.
Mofos Live (14 scenes) - As with other networks, a great idea that they stopped doing.
She's a Freak (387 scenes) - Fisting, weird insertions, etc...
B-Sides (66 scenes) - Little bit of everything including some public. Stranded Teens* (156 scenes) - Hitchhiker porn, kind of a car take on Bang Bus, most scenes are in the cars, some spill out into the streets. Real Slut Party - (256 scenes) - Multiple women having sex with multiple men and each other. Latina Sex Tapes* (292 scenes) - One of the few updating Latina "amateur" sites, only does one update per month but the scenes are good.
Let's Try Anal* (293 scenes) - Self-explanatory. Public Pickups* (296 scenes) - Public sex similar to most, guy offers money, girl gets naked in the grass or on the concrete.
Pervs on Patrol* (421 scenes) - Spying, peeking, turns to sex, fun site.
I Know that Girl* (452 scenes) - The flagship site that brought their earliest attention. Teens, early 20s models, tease, take selfies, then have sex.
Don't Break Me* (87 scenes) - Tiny women.
Share My BF* (47 scenes) - Bisexual girls having sex with a guy.
Ebony Sex Tapes* (24 scenes) - Newer site that shows tons of potential, very pretty and sexy black girls.
Girls Gone Pink* (14 scenes) - Lesbian sex.
Mofos Lab* (2 scenes) - Brand new site that might have the most potential, there's some public in it, some light BDSM, some POV, looks like they're going for the multiple-genre.
Maybe you can see why Mofos stands out? It's a network that actually has more sites updating than not updating. They also are adding those newer sites that fill in the niches well.
In some ways, I could almost justify paying the full price just because there's a lot of new content and varied genres being covered. Here's the numbers:
2,980 scenes across the basic network access with a total of 3,500 if you pay the extra for VIP and you also get a bonus 5,000 non-exclusive scenes with VIP too. All of the Mofos content is exclusive.
For the rest of the bad since it's looking like this network could have made a run at a 100. Pro-biller is their billing agent. I have learned to deal with their practices but they're actually worse here. You get the typical stupid one when signing up that nearly duplicates the site's name like this: Yes, I want access to MofosPlus for $2, no, I don't want this great deal. After you've made it through that one, instead of going to Mofos homepage, you land on a special offers page and it has one trial checked, you have to submit beyond the page or else it won't move forward. Just uncheck the one and make sure not to check the other 3. Yes, 4 cross-sales. Once on the site you can upgrade to VIP and unlock the above listed bonuses including downloading access and they have another "upgrade" that gives you access to more sites. I'm honestly afraid to click it!
It's a shame. This could be one of the strongest networks in porn. It has a clean interface, navigation is excellent, models are all well-above average. The picture sets come with all scenes and are photo shoot style not screencaps. Usually includes 15-30 pictures of the model in her regular clothes, bending over, etc
They do a good job at updates, keeping their sites alive, I Know that Girl has been around since 2009. The large amount of public content also helps a lot with me. It wants to be the network that someone says, "That's how you do a network!" but frustrating business practices stops that. I recommend but only if you do the VIP upgrade.
It's good to see a poll from an old member who hasn't been around for awhile. I picked "other" because I think my reviews are good for information, especially unbiased information but I think they're bad for the scores. A 75 would be average for most reviewers but my average is 85. This is how I write my reviews:
Facts: Content count, update frequency, highest video resolution and an in-general date for how long they have had that option, if they have pictures and if they're downloadable, my tested download speed, number of models, race/shape of models. Type of content like solo, hardcore, etc.
Sort of facts: Potential recycling, if things are offensive (subjective word but if it's offensive to me it's a sort of fact). The site's ethics in billing.
Not facts: My opinions about a site's webmaster being stubborn and my score.
I always have tried to give a person a list of facts for them to focus on those and say, "I don't care what he scores it, I would love this content!" Works the opposite way too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best MILF/GILF site on the internet.
- Ran by the same people who own Nubiles, lots of similar features here.
- Very clean site layout and easy to use.
- The amount of content will make your eyes bug out of your head.
- Updates similar to Nubiles, a new model comes along and they post 3-4 videos a week of her and 3-4 photo sets of her.
- One of my biggest complaints with Nubiles is one of Anilos biggest strengths, these ladies aren't shy or innocent, they just want you to watch them masturbate or have sex.
- Download speeds are very good, getting around 80% of my max speed.
- This might be a con to some, not all of these women look older and I like that. I think the youngest I've seen is 26, quite a few 29-30 and some of those don't look any older than "teen".
- The best part, I don't think the majority of these models are pros, there are some, but most look like your neighbor.
Cons:
- Finding promos for Anilos can be frustrating, I don't think hardly any site these days is worth the old premium price. Luckily, I joined during the TBP/PU Holiday Sale. I know their webmaster talked about a Nubiles/Anilos combo offer, but I haven't seen it yet.
- It comes with the territory, some of these models are just not attractive to me, mostly it's the ones with gray hair. I'm not even attracted to young women who have colored their hair gray.
- Some will see this as a big con, there's not much outside solo masturbation sets, I think from the looks of it, they're updating about once a month with some hardcore, but I would say 80-90% of the content is solo.
Bottom Line:
I remember joining this site when it was first opening. That was 10 years ago. Which means I was in my early 30s and really hadn't ever thought about an attraction to older women. The good news is, most of these models are 29-42 and they look like someone's wife or neighbor. I ran out of room in the pros so I'll add this here:
One of the biggest strengths of this site is a lack of implants and tattoos. Some do have them, but you don't see a lot of it.
The humorous part for me is coming from Nubiles where I think the innocence, the shyness, timidness can be a bit frustrating then you join Anilos it's like a completely different world! The ages and rules have changed. Probably the funniest is the highly-entertaining Aaliyah Love who comes off as timid and shy and innocent. And we all know better. I think that's just her thing she does.
The models here, in most cases, seem to genuinely love the idea of being filmed, photographed in sexy clothes and nude. You get the feeling that a lot of these women are probably at the point in life where they're maybe not feeling as sexy as they used to and the camera comes on and they light up.
For review's sake, this age range is my preferred age range. I struggle some with the 18-19 year models and don't like the much older models. There's a middle ground here and it's rare in porn sites these days. I can't imagine what Anilos goes through to get this many women in an older age range.
They also start every scene with fully clothed model, she strips, she teases and if you pay attention, you can see their sensuality coming out. That makes porn good to me. It's like seeing a woman empowered instead of the teen sites which make me feel like I'm being an old perv.
Let's do some numbers, it shocks me how much this site has grown:
530 models as of 1/9/2018
2,300 videos
2,400 picture sets
Anilos like Nubiles uses a standard shoot method with each model. It typically is 5 videos and 5 photo sets. It can vary slightly, but if you like a model, you'll almost always have 5 videos and 5 photo sets. These do include an interview video too. Some are actually pretty good.
The models don't have a lot of variety in race, but there's plenty of variety in body types from chubby to slender, and the nationality is covered pretty well. A lot of American women so you like hearing the English language, they do that, some UK, quite a few from Europe, it's hard to complain about race mixture since it is a limited group of models available in their later years.
Starting in November 2013, they started having a 1080p option on all videos. Prior to that, they have a 720p top option on every video dating back to 2008. They also include around 100 photos per set and these are high-quality, varying between 2400 high end and 3500 high end, they are not screenshots or taking from video, they are photo shoot quality photos. These can be downloaded in a zip file.
I think I have the same problem I sometimes run into with Nubiles, it feels samey from one scene to another. These "older" women add some life to the scenes, but if you've been a member of Nubiles, you understand what I'm talking about. It's not anything that I could recommend a way to fix, but it is also about the only real negative I can find with it.
I actually prefer that the models are doing solo masturbation. That's where you really see them light up, all the focus is on them. I'm sure Nubiles gives them what's equal to a makeover and you can just see them wanting to come out of their shell. I even think this is a very positive site in terms of of a woman's image of herself.
The hardcore shoots are dull to me. I think it removes the spotlight I've talked about. I'll always take sensuality over sex when it comes to porn.
Their update schedule is good, 3-4 scenes per week, each comes with a video and photo set. I kind of thought some bonus sites might be added, but if they are, I can't find them. I'm not saying bonus sites are needed, but Nubiles has several so it might make sense to include those bonus sites over at Anilos too. I'm mostly talking about those sites that stopped updating like Driver XXX.
Would also like to see more promos of Anilos, especially in combination with Nubiles and the Nubiles network. I thought I had one, but it was Nubiles and FTV. I don't think it's a site that would be a common join, maybe 2 times a year. The files are generally small compared to a lot of porn these days, especially if you prefer 720p.
It's a very good site and I think it's even a fairly rare site since I've seen "older" sites that are filled with porn stars, while this really looks to be mostly amateurs. I would recommend it to those who like tease, some of these women talk dirty, those who like their porn to start out dressed and those who like the MILF-aged models. It has a fairly high appeal factor, I think. And it is easily the best in its class.
I had said I was going to include navigation tips in my review of this site, but ran out of characters. This really goes for all Kink Network sites.
There's one major thing missing - An alphabetical list of models.
Also, since it's a network, you're dropped into a hub that has content from every site in the network. It might be obvious to some, but I didn't realize you could click on the logos of each site and it would only show you content from that site. That improved the navigation a lot for me.
The search engine is maybe too specific in some ways and not near specific enough in other ways. Since there are gay and male sites on this network, you can filter to just see women or men or transsexual.
The problem is even after filtering down to female, you're left with more filters you can add, but that aren't that helpful. Like ethnicity. Hair color. Pubic hair. Body type. Where's "by number of scenes" or "alphabetically" or "most popular"? Some of the most featured models have changed quite a bit. I know Dragon Lily has had at least one child somewhere in-between her oldest scenes and newest scenes, same with Isis Love. And Isis Love's ethnicity isn't obvious. Think I found her in "mixed". Just a simple list of letters to click on "I" would be great.
There is a search box. It's tucked away in the right-hand upper corner of the screen and is a symbol of a magnifying glass. It's not accurate at all. I searched for Daisy and out of the first 10 scenes that came up, only four had Daisy in them.
The other tip, if you want out of the hub, which still requires scrolling until you find a scene from a site you want to check out, like other sites they've decided to name their different "sites" as "channels". And you can get to a channel list from the "browse" tab. Maybe not anything groundbreaking here in my tips, but hopefully that helps somebody.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Still a unique site that has seen its better days.
- Women wrestling. Stripping each other's clothes off. Force-groping each other. Fingering each other for "points".
- If you're a Dragon Lily or Isis Love fan, then that's a major pro for this site as there's lots of content of them.
- Kink quality and overall experience, lots of scrolling, slightly hidden tricks (see comment didn't fit in BL), access to the Kink network and its near 50 sites.
- This should have been my top pro. The live content. It blows away the studio content. See cons.
- Zipped pictures are back, 1200 long end, but at least they're back.
- More content than you'd believe. As of 12/24/2017: 975 scenes.
- Good download speeds, about 75% of my max.
- Navigation is a con if you're new. If you've been here awhile it's not bad at all.
- Site updates once a week, network updates 3 times a day.
Cons:
- That live content hasn't been added in a long time. To the best I can tell, the last live "match" was in August 2016. If I shared my 10 favorite scenes from this site all 10 would be live matches. I'll go more into those in the BL.
- As is the norm with Kink, the highest quality videos are 720p, which I prefer anyway, but could be a turn-off for others. Should mention that most of their scenes are in the hour or longer range, so anything over 720p is going to be a huge file.
- They're having a hard time replacing old favorites on Ultimate Surrender.
Bottom Line:
I first heard of or saw Ultimate Surrender content on an old TGP site back over a decade ago. It looked interesting. I have a fairly-long background in martial arts, even dating back to before anyone had heard of UFC. The premise of the site, in the old days, was unplanned, unscripted, "wrestling" matches. Think more like MMA or Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu or in even more specific terms -- grappling.
I didn't have the best experience talking to one of their producers back in the mid-2000s. I found it insulting to claim unscripted. It's obvious, we're going to compare this to pro wrestling, which doesn't even try to claim unscripted. I felt it showed dishonesty and in turn, I don't do business with dishonest companies.
To understand my frustration with it, I know one of the models, went to high school with her in Los Angeles. She's one of the sweetest, most-artsy, least-athletic women I've ever known. And for most of her match, she dominated her opponent. There is a point with a site like this that fantasy has to go away or else it's not that interesting for 2/3 of each scene.
Kink started growing and while they still threw out the word "unscripted", they obviously followed the lead of professional wrestling and developed "heels" and "babyfaces". Dragon Lily played a major role as a heel. A fairly well-trained grappler with a great traditional female build and she would wipe out her opponents. Then they'd find someone who would come in and beat Dragon Lily. They even expanded the Dragon Lily streak of dominance by having her dominate men. I personally would be up for that role.
Which is important to my review. I like dominant women. I don't care if it's scripted either. They later brought in Isis Love, who was as good maybe better than Dragon Lily at the top "bad girl" role.
They then decided to try something new. The matches were becoming stale. All were held in the same room of the Kink Dungeon or whatever it's called. Two women usually grunting (not sexually), skin slapping in a completely quiet room.
They brought in a live crowd. Completely changed the way these scenes are viewed. And these weren't crowds of other porn stars. There's older women, older men, middle-aged people, look like random people off the street and they all watch and respond as these women grapple and try to grope each other. They could have produced one live scene a month and I would have loved it. Even with no other updates! Just 1 live one a month, but they only did the live scenes for a short period of time.
The numbers of this site aren't much to talk about. They're impressive: Nearly 1,000 scenes and all roughly lasting 45 minutes or so. The 720p videos, for whatever reason, Kink does a great job at filming, look crisp. But that's really all there is to talk about the site except the concepts and gimmicks (live).
To show the continuity they formed with certain models: Dragon Lily's first Ultimate Surrender match was posted on August 10, 2004. She stayed active in the matches through April 1, 2014 and made a one-time comeback in 2015.
To a lesser extent:
Isis Love's first match was posted on February 8, 2005 and her last match was posted on September 3, 2013.
My favorite scene was Isis' return. She had been away for awhile. It's a live scene. She's in the crowd as a spectator and I didn't even realize it was her at first. She starts squeezing her thighs together as she's watching the women wrestling. She ends up being involved as one of the wrestlers is made to flirt/tease her. This drops the sexual action right into the middle of the crowd. It was like Kink's Public Disgrace site except it was to most viewers, a non-porn star spreading her legs in front of strangers. One of my all-time favorite scenes from any site.
Which explains the 83. No live scenes in over a year and those live scenes, while "live" weren't like the live scenes from I think 2011-2014, the newer live scenes are back in the same dull room just with a row of people sitting off the side of the wrestling mat. The older live scenes were much higher energy and the crowds reactions were big pluses.
And the 83 is because the newer models just aren't as believable. It's like watching a lesbian scene that has 30 minutes of fluff at the beginning. I hate using wrestling terms, but there's no "heat", meaning, the competition, even scripted, is no longer there. Daisy Ducati does a good job in her matches, but she seems to be about getting off as much as getting the other woman off. Which is a selling point of a site like this. Isis, Dragon Lily, they would finger, strap-on the woman they beat and stop when she started to orgasm.
It's still worth the price since you can still download all those older scenes, including all the live ones, but currently, it updates once a week and the updates are interchangeable. Having been about as negative as I'll be in a review, I still will say the Kink Network is the best deal in porn.
I think Rocketpay is okay. I don't like that they want you to use the "remember me" feature, which recognizes you if you join a different site that uses Rocketpay and tries to pull-up your past payment info. I'm sure they're trying to be helpful, but the last time it pulled one of mine up, it was a card that expired in 2012.
I don't know exactly how credit card processors work these days, but I do know that they charge a fee for their full-services. The sites lower their costs by having the sign-up and cancel pages on their sites, instead of having separate CCBill sign-up and cancel pages. It also allows sites to include things like surveys when you go to cancel. Mano Job does that. It's five basic questions like, "What would you like to see on our site?" and "How can we make our site better?"
The cancellation link is on the main page of the site at the top. You'll see "support". When you click it, the drop-down menu comes up and has "cancel" as an option. From there you cancel just like you would on CCBill or Epoch and they do send a cancellation confirmation email too. They seem like pretty decent people. I posted a comment about one of their sites being broken and they had it fixed almost immediately.
Oh and Rocketpay has been around for awhile. They used to be the primary for all of the Kink sites. And I know I touched on it in my review, but there's no DL Limit unless I missed a point. On my last night of the membership, I downloaded 142 GB and didn't hit a limit.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best handjob site on the internet and it's not even close.
- Has network access with it, but I scored this site 9 points higher than the network, it's a miring network that takes away from this site.
- Unlike the rest of the network, Mano Job is updating with new content and isn't recycling.
- An unheard of, unmatched, roughly 800 handjob videos.
- Some well-known models and some that I probably just don't know by names.
- Probably internet porn's best tagging system. Will go more into this in BL.
- They experiment with niches by adding CFNM elements to some scenes, and using the various actions that are well-tagged and easy to find.
- Very good download speeds.
- Excellent technical quality on this site with over 700 of those videos having 1080p option. Also pictures with zips if interested in those.
Cons:
- Is it fair to say the network it's on? The main two other sites in the network are recycling, which causes me to think the whole network is recycling. When on the network's hub, you get a mix from the 3 sites so it takes away from the Mano Job content.
- I think its price is a little high, it's fairly unique content and they do it better than anyone, but it's $30.
- There's still a listed but undefined download limit. I really don't believe it's there.
- Really the only real con is the common one. It's a niche site and all scenes are fairly similar, it can and does become boring.
Bottom Line:
I have only scored a site from a network, higher than its network, one time before this. Think it was Nubiles.net. I actually think in this case it's a big difference. The network this site is on has around 1,300 scenes. A little over 800 of those scenes are on this site, Mano Job. I've been told, "You don't have to go to the other sites", it's not the point. If you sell me something as a network, then I have expectations. Because I brought up some rather negative points about the network, I thought it was only right and fair for me to come back and post something more positive about this site. One more part on this, the site Chelci Fox, which isn't advertised as included, but is included as you find out later in your membership, is now fixed and operational. Good job by them to update the certificate or whatever it was that was causing a problem. There's a full explanation in the comment section on that problem.
I think the first big question here is "is Mano Job recycling?" My instinct tells me no. They're updating quite a bit, I think 16 out of the 19 days of December, so far, but these scenes look new. I hate that I'm not as caught up on the current models, but will say one of the December updates if of Roxy Deville, who I do know is retired. It could be something they recorded before she retired and are just now getting around to releasing. Most of the rest of the models aren't familiar to me.
Why would I make such a bold claim as "the best handjob site"? Simple. Handjob sites are notorious for having repeat models, not just a few or the not intended pun of a handful of times, but many handjob sites have about 12-15 women who they use for 100 scenes. I still believe this site is somehow related to Fucked Hard 18 and the models here are very comparable to the models on Fucked Hard 18. Young, some curvy, different races and nearly all are attractive. Which is something you'll also have trouble finding on handjob sites. So, that's part of my reasoning behind "the best".
Then there's the amount of content. There are handjob "networks" that don't have half the amount of content this site has. The oldest scene is from December 2005, so they've been around a long time even though they didn't update much back then...
Which does make me question the recycling possibility. But if they are recycling some old scenes, they are doing so in remastered 1080p.
The tagging system deserves its own section. Handjobs are fairly basic. But as the genre once grew into a popular one, it stopped being the common handjob. Things like Tit-fucking were added. Pussy Tease was added. Butt Tease was added. The out of control, breaking the rules, Oral option was added. The tags might not be 100% right, but they are pretty accurate. I think in a handjob genre, those little tagged niches are very important. It kind of reminds me of lesbian sites that tag every action in a scene, which is a great help. I get tired of watching videos looking for one certain action only to not see it.
And those combined reasons make it the best handjob site.
I think as porn viewers and users (same thing?) get more and more used to common cookie-cutter porn scenes, they'll start looking into handjobs, CFNM, since I'm pretty sure that's what happened to me.
The one part that might surprise potential members are the pictures. Again, the thought going into this content is very good. I really didn't think I would care anything about pictures from a handjob site, but at least 1/3 of the pictures (in downloadable zips) are just of the model before the handjob, teasing, in her regular clothes and that actually adds to the content.
Seeing that the vast majority of the content is available in 1080p helps for those into the technical aspects. The videos also have the 720p option and "web" and "mobile" versions. They also do have a "cumshot" option in the videos. This site, in and of itself is impressive.
I have very little to say about the other sites in the network. You might find something you like on them, but I didn't. The Chelci Fox one has some interesting content that does look fairly old (maybe 2005-2010 era?), but is typical solo girl-type content.
I also think this is a good example of a question that has been asked here on PU. The price does hurt the score. Based on the standards that are used in grading a site, it's very close to a 100, by itself, it does everything it says and they have evolved it with new situations and actions, but the price and inclusion in a network that's not very good, brings the score down a little. I'm doing math there and thinking if it wasn't sold as a network, the price would be cheaper for this one site.
If you're looking for handjob content this is really the only site you need to join. If you're looking for something different than the normal porn, this would be a good alternative to try. Most of the big name models I know of, are on here.
Music is a huge part of my life and it's mainly because of the emotions it pulls out of me. I'll probably break the character limit:
Song that always makes me smile:
Mungo Jerry - In the Summertime. My dad and uncle were very stoic and strict men, but they would put the leisure suits on, platform shoes, drink in their hand and would dance to this song.
The artist that hits my emotions the hardest is Tori Amos. Tori's song, "The Winter" has brought tears to my eyes and I'm not an emotional person. All of her music works on my emotions, but that one is the most powerful for me.
On a similar note, my favorite band is Tool. They also run my emotions, but not like Tori. I first heard Tool in LA, when I was 16-17, before they were even signed and they were the first rock/metal band I liked that well.
Iron Maiden pushes me, kind of inspiring, especially their Rock in Rio album where hundreds of thousands of non-English speaking Brazilians sing every word in the background.
Then it moves over to rap/hip-hop. Gangster rap was huge when I was in high school in LA. Everyone listened to NWA and everyone loved Ice Cube. Not me, I preferred Ice-T, also a LA rapper and now actor. His song, "LGBNAF" was the first really dirty rap song I ever heard and thought it was the greatest song ever.
Wu-Tang Clan. I was the weird West Coast kid who loved the East Coast group. Still do and their side project song, "Mystery of Shadowboxing (feat Method Man)" is #1 and #10 on my workout playlist.
On that note, I like playing Mary J. Blige's song, "You're All I Need" for people who only hear radio versions, since it is severely censored and is hugely popular still today. The uncensored/dirty version features Method Man of Wu-Tang and it's good for laughs to see people look at the speakers expecting the radio version.
Then there's Johnny Cash. I smile anytime I hear his songs from the Tennessee Three era, has the thump-te-de-thump sound in all songs. My grandmother adored Johnny Cash and always played his music. On the other hand, I really like his cover of "Hurt", but can't watch the video. That's the closest anyone has gotten to truly making art out of music, but once you realize what's going on, it's hard to watch. If it's not known, Johnny and June had moved out of their house which became the Johnny Cash Museum. About halfway through the video the setting changes. They're back in the house and the already sick and dying Cash pours emotions out as he's "singing". The song was originally about heroin addiction, but Johnny changed almost no lyrics and made it about a regretful, dying man looking back at all the time and energy he wasted.
Another that makes me smile, but only if it's the video. Xzibit's "Concentrate". That woman in the middle in the black kimono tops all porn stars for me!
Last, obscure rap group/song, Psycho Realm, "In this Lifetime" makes me smile a lot if it's the video. I'm in the video and I grew up with those guys.
Bang Bros like a lot of sites these days keeps your membership "active" even after you have cancelled. Meaning, you can still sign in and be tempted to rejoin. When I was a member a few months ago, I added their first level of upgrades, which included Dancing Bear, CFNM Show, my review goes over those. That time, it cost me $17 to join Bang Bros and then $19.95 to add the upgrades.
I realized I didn't have some content I meant to get and signed in as a non-subscription member. The offer popped up to rejoin everything I had before at $19.95. So, going back, got me Bang Bros and the first level of upgrades for nearly half the cost it originally cost me. Thought I would share this in case anyone is interested.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of porn's greatest values and most realistic sites, includes two sites, I'll consider reviewing at least one of them as well since this is packaged as a network.
- Kelly Madison, I think I've made it clear over the years that I don't have a set "type" of model that I like. Kelly is now a very attractive, older model with very large natural boobs and she is a big part of all the content on the network.
- It's not amateur porn, but it kind of is.
- There's not much bullshit here. Hey, that's a pro! They even number their scenes. Well, there was a cross-sale, but I think it doesn't charge, just gives you a free day to another site.
- Excellent quality throughout.
- Good download speeds, about 75% of my max.
- Kelly's husband Ryan is also a big part of the sites and he's not annoying.
- Blurs a line between voyeurism, reality porn, professional studio porn and amateur porn.
- Updates every other day. Video and pictures.
- Above-average variance in model race.
Cons:
- There's a few ads at the bottom of the pages. Not really that noticeable.
- Borrowing a term I've seen the TBP reviewers use, pagination issues. It's because it's a lot of content and really isn't that big of a con.
- I think for some it could come off as too polished. I'm reaching.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to be as honest as possible. I'm trying my best to find a site to give a 100 to. I haven't reviewed this site since 2008 and it's improved a great deal since then. But I couldn't quite go 100. The 3 sites included could easily be standalone sites. I usually join and feel overwhelmed. I'm going to give the across the network numbers and talk about the entire network until I see that it all won't fit in one review. If that happens, I'll review one of the other sites too.
Kelly Madison has been around for awhile. I'm guessing she was a late bloomer. I've seen her listed as 50, if she is, she's taken great care of herself. I guess she's most-known for her 36G natural boobs, sorry if the number is wrong. And despite her boob size she's slender. One of the sites is the one I'm posting this review on, Kelly Madison. It has updates dating back to 2000. There's solo sets, Kelly with other women, Kelly with her husband Ryan and Ryan with other women. You will find sets with neither Ryan or Kelly on them, but the vast majority have one or both in them.
One of the other sites is Teen Fidelity. There are a lot of scenes with Ryan with teen models. I don't know, I think Kelly enjoys it. You will find some scenes without either in them, but again, the majority will have Ryan in them on this site as it seems to be his gift that he received for marrying Kelly.
The other is Porn Fidelity. This goes into threesomes with Kelly and Ryan with another female model. In my pros and cons I said, "It's not amateur porn, but it kind of is." What I mean by that is you will know a lot of these models, but you don't have the typical studio porn clinical feel. It genuinely looks like people enjoying sex.
Just a mention for one of my favorite scenes is of the "new" Amia Miley. I put "new" because I've not seen her like this. Her scene with Ryan is worth a join.
What they do here, in my opinion, is kind of genre-blending. There's exhibitionism as some of the models like to get naked in public as the scene is setting up. There's voyeurism since from what I can tell, Kelly and/or Ryan produce the scenes and watch each other, there's straight b/g scenes, there's threesomes b/g/g, there's g/g scenes and there's solo scenes. They're covering all the bases.
And they get some of the best models in the world, who, in my opinion, look much more comfortable in their scenes on these sites than they do in the big studio scenes.
The complaints are minor. Older scenes of course aren't as good of technical quality. The amount of content and clicks create the "pagination" issue.
Here's some numbers: Kelly Madison - 1,205 scenes, pictures, video and BTS pictures included in most. Porn Fidelity - 719 scenes, pictures, video and BTS pictures in most. Teen Fidelity - 294 scenes, pictures, video and BTS pictures in most.
That's 2,218 scenes.
I did forget one thing that would fall into the pro/con depending on the person. The majority of these scenes are long. Some even go over an hour. The file sizes are going to fill a hard drive up very fast. I download the 720p format and even those can be in the 2GB per video range.
The overall feeling is that this site, if you're into hardcore, could easily be a site you'll find any and everything you're looking for with the one catch, Kelly and Ryan are in most of the scenes.
For me, as much as I like it, I'm not as into hardcore as I know a lot of Porn Users are, but they still do a good job of having the models dressed in normal clothes, stripping, and catering to us that especially like exhibitionism.
I could see joining the network for up to 6 months even. Kelly's enthusiasm is a big plus and well, why wouldn't Ryan be enthusiastic? They have hit on a formula here where over time they've made a name for themselves and the models, I would say 95%, seem to really enjoy the scenes. Despite all my positive talk there's still a few warnings. If the thought of most scenes involving one or both of the same people bothers you then you might not like it as well as I do. They do a good job of mixing in other couples and especially with Porn Fidelity with bringing in other females for both Kelly and Ryan to play with.
The sign-up and cancellation is handled by the site itself and it's as easy as possible. Which is the other part that the deepest critics might notice. This site does everything to make itself seem not professional shot, and it's not, it's just that they have so much experience in the business that they are professionals. I can't imagine anyone not liking or at least enjoying this network. You also get an internet porn history lesson since it started as a solo site, then moved into a threesome/hardcore site, then brought teens in to be with old Ryan, sorry Ryan, it's jealousy. I was actually going to list "Didn't marry Kelly" as a con. Great site overall. One of my all-time favorites.
I went to cancel my membership to the Mano Job network and instead of taking me to a cancel screen it brought up a survey about my experience on their site. I don't really mind that since it was just basic questions like:
Would you recommend our site to your friends?
But it also asked which of their sites I had visited, said there are four sites included. I only knew of three. The four choices were:
Mano Jobs The Dick Suckers Mr. POV Chelci Fox
Never having heard of Chelci Fox, I went to chelcifox(dotcom) and tried to sign in as a member, as soon as clicked the "members login" button, my browser bounced a warning up that it was not a secure connection and could be a phishing attempt. I closed Firefox and tried it on Microsoft Edge, Internet Explorer and Chrome and all three of those gave the same type of warning. Maybe it's just me, but this network already has questionable practices going on with the recycling of content, now another problem comes up. I'd still recommend Mano Job, but just be careful on there.
I picked "don't care who knows".
Having said that, I don't exactly offer up "I watch porn" in conversation either. I do offer my username here at PU for friends to read my reviews so if they're interested in a site they'll join through PU's links.
Funny thing is and I would wonder if it applies to other members here, no one who knows me casually, would ever expect my interest in porn. There's a younger woman who works with my mom that I've become a bit of a mentor to in psychology. More than anything, she's most impressed by me rarely "cussing". I think that's how I look at porn too. There's a time for it, just like there's a time for cussing, but it wouldn't bother me to tell anyone about my interest in porn and most people would be surprised how many people find my interest in porn to be very interesting and even intriguing.
I checked using the search filters and there's good and bad news.
The scenes from Amateur Allure can be downloaded, but there's only 20 of them. Seems they're using it as a promotional tool.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's a network that's not really a network that has one of the internet's top handjob sites in it.
- Includes 3 sites, Mano Job, The Dick Suckers (really, people?) and Mr POV. At least we know they're not using their creative juices for site names. There's also bonus scenes from Amateur Allure and Fucked Hard 18.
- Download speeds are good, 75% of my max.
- Most scenes include pictures and they are downloadable. There's also various options on the videos including "bra busting" clip and "cumshot only".
- Navigation is excellent. Well, kind of, it will make more sense as you read through.
- Mano Job has been around for 10+ years. It was the first handjob site I saw that used the "pussy tease", a very important part for me.
- Rocketgate as biller, I've had no problems with them, but do get annoyed by them remembering me and trying to use my sign-up information from 2012. Cards expire!
- No real ads, some live cams from within the site, no cross-sales.
Cons:
- I'm going to get this one out of the way. Handjob porn isn't for everyone and I'll explain in the BL what it is that I like about it and even for me, it gets very repetitive.
- The damning one, though it's not hurting my score since there's still a lot of content here. They're recycling content and my guess is they have been for awhile. I think some of it might be remastered when they recycle it, but one of the newest scenes is of Aliana Love, who hasn't shot porn since 2014. There will be more in the bottom line.
- Supposed download limit, I tested it as good as I could, downloaded 76 GB in 7 hours, didn't hit a limit, so this isn't so much a con as it is a reminded that they do say they have a download limit.
Bottom Line:
Why would I call a network, a network that's not really a network? Because I was a member of Mano Job way back in 2010 and it included The Dick Suckers and Mr. POV. Finishes the Job is nothing more than a hub that brings all the content of those three sites together. It did wonders for the navigation, but this is pretty much the same thing as joining Mano Job and getting the other two sites with it. I don't know, maybe that's a little questionable since Finishes the Job before signing up looks like another full site to go along with those other three.
What's not questionable is the content count. I was shocked when I first opened the site. They have 31 updates in November 2017, that's more than 1 per day. I hadn't realized Finishes the Job even exists. I was just looking at Mano Job as a join to get some old content I no longer have. This really isn't a negative review as the score shows, but I'm going to show the numbers:
RearAdmiral reviewed this site in 2015 and listed 1,400+ scenes.
Mbaya reviewed this site in 2016 and listed 1,452 scenes.
Xander of TBP reviewed this site in March of 2017 and there was 1,308 scenes.
Here I am in late November 2017, a month that has seen 31 updates in 21 days and the total is 1,266.
Ahem.
Maybe things are a little questionable. I know one scene is recycled, it's one of the newest updates and it's of Aliana Love, who hasn't shot porn since 2014. I'm guessing these sites are also owned by the people who own Fucked Hard 18 and maybe even Amateur Allure too. There's a phantom site Finishes the Job and 200 less scenes than 2015, but I still think it's a very good site.
The navigation is very simple. They've combined the content into one area. Four rows of four scenes per page, 79 pages. Over on the left toolbar you can pick to just see Mano Job site scenes or any of the other sites, including Amateur Allure and Fucked Hard 18.
Handjob porn appealed to me back 10 years ago or so. I saw a handjob scene with Brianna Beach in it. She was already one of the best, most believable porn stars, but that scene pushed her over the top. The enjoyment she showed, the arousal she had, it was bad enough that she was asking for the scene to be a sex scene because she was so turned on. That's what handjob porn offers me. You can watch half or more of these scenes and the models look downright bored. Some even look like they're watching a television off the screen. The other models, they look more aroused and more excited than in even their hardcore scenes.
Mano Job does a good job of this. As mentioned, they were the first to do the pussy tease handjob and it's always fun to watch those because it teases many of the female models more than it is the male. That's very rare in porn. The woman being teased.
It's not going to be possible to say when they started releasing 1080p videos since they're recycling, but I would estimate at least half of the scenes have 1080p, don't hold me to that, but I've went back halfway through the pages and there's still a 1080p option.
That excellent navigation might hurt them even more. It's making it easy to see that they are cram-updating. I remember other sites doing this back a few years ago, they would remove 100 and release them over a month as new.
I still can't help but laugh over the names of the sites, did somebody really say, "The Dick Suckers"? Mano Job is the "star" here and the main draw. There's been mixed reports on the DL limit, Xander mentions in his TBP review that there's no DL Limit, but it does show up in their TOS, it just isn't active from the best I can tell.
Look at this as an archive site. The content is good, even if it's repetitive. Good quality, excellent navigation, little to no ads, no cross sales, it's hard to be too hard on them as being dishonest when they're not taking advantage of multiple cross sales and dozens of ads. If I was going to offer advice it would be to put all the content back on it and just let the content sell itself. Nearly all handjob and CFNM sites have gone under.
And that's how I will recommend it, for those who like handjob content or POV content, I don't particularly care for Mr POV or The Dick Suckers, but the content is typical on those sites. Even though I would recommend it to those who like handjob content, I will only do so on a one-month basis. I won't be back after this month. Which I think is sort of a strength for an archive site. You can get everything you want in a month and know there's no more new content coming out. Last, as far as I can tell, this is exclusive content, but I want to mention again the bonus site content, specifically Fucked Hard 18, the blue room that's used in nearly every Fucked Hard 18 scene is also used occasionally on Mano Job.
I would say don't do any of those four things! I haven't had too many experiences of being wronged by a site, but I don't even like it when webmasters start offering discounts and especially "swag". Have had a couple do that on here. I am not walking around with a t-shirt on that says a porn site's name on it. After I've thought about it, maybe the "extend membership" is one that would be acceptable. Seems like Twisty's and maybe 21 Sextury had problems about 5-6 years ago and they extended all their members memberships by a month. Most of the wronging I've experienced probably couldn't be fixed. Like the false advertising of content before I joined, only to join and see that they don't have the content they advertised. That's an older one, but it used to be very common during the European boom in the 2005-09 range. I remember one showed Eve Angel as a featured model. I joined it. Got inside, went to Eve's page and it said "coming soon!" How can she be a featured model without content? That was frustrating.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- More of a softcore site, but not as soft as it used to be and has some of the prettiest models in the world on it.
- Good handling of signing up, cancelling, as it's part of Met-Art's network and uses the same cancelling method as Met-Art.
- 2-3 updates per week depending on the week, this nearly landed in cons, but will explain in BL.
- Excellent navigation, uses the same or similar site format and style as the other Met-Art sites.
- Very good download speeds, right around 80% of my max which is what I get consistently on Met-Art sites.
- Good for photo collectors! That almost gets two pros just because it's so rare to see these days. I'll further this in BL too.
- Some rare slightly harder than softcore sets of models who are more known for just softcore.
- I think this applies across the Met-Art network sites, everything is high-quality.
Cons:
- So, you like amateur models who aren't glam? This probably isn't the site for you.
- Picture sets can be on the small side, not resolution, but amount of photos in each. And the membership I signed up for is only offering 720p on the videos. Not for sure if there's another level that has higher. If there is, I haven't seen it.
- You might run into a feeling of "seen that, saw that" as you go from scene to scene.
- Could be clearer about the biller. I had a charge on my bank card from this site, but hadn't heard of the biller and thought it was fraudulent.
Bottom Line:
A confession: I have had the biggest crush on Lana Lopez for nearly a decade, also known as, Next Door Lana. I was looking through my old content of her and found a video from her own site that's no longer around. It was branded Holly Randall, so I joined for that very reason. A search on their site said they had more content of her and it's the closest I've seen Lana do to even masturbation (not counting those newer scenes or In The Crack).
Getting that content, including the photo sets too, would have been enough to make me a happy customer. As I looked at Lana's pictures, I decided to go look at some of the other models. Much like the top photo sites, this site has very clear, high-resolution photos that are shot in beautiful locations and settings. They also have quite a few of their models starting out in regular clothes or a bikini. It's becoming a lost art so they get a bonus 5 points for that.
The update schedule threw me off. And I'm still going to say it's a little inconsistent. It doesn't help that I'm a dyslexic American and they use the UK way of listing dates with the day first instead of the month. But there is inconsistency in the updates. The month of October had 10 updates, but there was a no-update period of 5 days in the middle of the month.
Then they released a Halloween set of one of my all-time favorite models Veronica Rodriguez and all was forgiven! Didn't even realize she's still active.
My recommendation of this site would depend on several things. Photos are a big enough part of this site that some updates are just photos. There's some b/g content, but it's not that common. I would estimate 20-25% at most. The majority of the content is solo pretty women masturbating. With a catch, this is common across all sites that have solo masturbation, a lot of it is very mechanical feeling.
Then I stumbled on a set with Gina Valentina in it and all was forgiven! Dear lord, where did they find her? Can I move there? I seriously found a new model to collect. Not for sure how "new" she is, but I hadn't ever seen her and she's the first one I've added to my collecting folder in 2 years. They do something else here that I usually only say about In the Crack, the women here look better here than on other sites. An example is Uma Jolie, who I've considered collecting, but changed my mind, the content here makes her stunning.
That's a big plus here. Even if you prefer amateur models and I'm probably 50/50 now myself, there are some really pretty women on here.
My biggest complaint which was only mentioned a little in the cons is the size of photo sets, same with the videos, they're fairly short. That's one of those "it's not really a con since I'm just wanting more of what I see" but since we don't have on-demand porn subscriptions to request to see more of a set, that's a slight con eventually.
Then I saw Karlee Gray, Aubrey Sinclair and Val Dodds. I'm not going to say it again, but I forgot the cons.
It could be that I'm not joining as many sites these days or it could be that I join sites that don't have these newer models on them, but I found multiple models that I started "collecting" folders for.
Technical quality is very high on photos, not as good on videos.
Pictures are downloadable and newer ones are in the 6000 long end range.
Videos for me have 720p option, 360p option and a mobile option. I joined with a normal membership and don't remember there being an option to join a 1080p version, not that I would have since I prefer 720p, but it's worth mentioning since some of the updates being photo sets will already irritate those who like videos only.
Over 300 models, which I think is a little low and might show that they're selective. Most of the models I've like have multiple photo sets and videos.
Roughly 700 videos and 600 photo sets. I should mention here that Holly Randall is the daughter of Suze Randall, a legendary name in porn. Holly, herself, has sets on here as well. Kind of adds a different feel to it since she also is a photographer on the site.
Which I think leads to how I feel about the site. I think with Holly's direction these models, the photo sets, the videos, have very high tease and "slip" photos like Amia Miley, who I thought was long gone from porn, in a bikini and in one photo the bikini has slid over. There's a lot of that here and it's good for me. They even have a tag for "striptease". Sometimes, doing less is more.
Great site overall, but certainly not for everyone. If you're a video lover, you might still like this site, but the best content, on this site, to me are the pictures. I honestly liked it better than I thought I would since my original reason to join was to just grab the Lana Lopez content.
I'll give it a try lol.
It's like you're watching porn that's not being filmed or planned. There's scenes where the actors/actresses dictate what they want next. It's like there's a strange honesty in it. One model, despite saying the male was very good, said she rarely orgasms and didn't, but she starts masturbating after the sex and has an orgasm. The feeling around the scenes are more genuine. They come off as people getting paid to perform, but also who love sex. It's refreshing to me since I already had been experiencing boredom with most hardcore sites unless there was a distracting story. I also wonder how much of the Italian market they have. The scenes are very professionally-shot, high quality, nice settings, in a way it reminds me of Sex Art except without the heartcore content. I found the tips and hints scenes to be some of the best I've seen on any site just because of the way the models interacted. That could be it too. You know how you watch a mainstream movie with a bunch of amateur actors and then watch one with top-tier mainstream actors and actresses? That difference is what these scenes bring. I'll end by saying don't let that take away from the site it's not "professional" in the American professional porn way of glamour and glitz, it's just like you're watching professional women who are professionals at sex. The men, by my guess, are not professionals, but I could be wrong.
I don't know if I've ever posted about VR, but I remember when PU had the VR set they were offering. Don't know if I posted it there or not, but I can't use VR. Crazy and a nice reminder to my youth, I was stabbed above my eye as a teenager, right around the eyebrow. It still causes some vision problems in that eye, but it also makes it impossible for me to use VR since it will only mess more with how my eye processes what it sees. I haven't even tried the PS4, sticking with the Xbox One, because Sony pushes the VR so much and I know I can't use it. Just thought I would post that if it seems like I've not shown interest towards or against VR.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An interesting, hardcore site that features models I've never seen and some older Euro models who I thought were retired.
- Updates weekly. A mention here on navigation since they have separate categories and it can make updates a little confusion. There are new "videos" added weekly though.
- By my count, there's 212 videos as of 10/26/2017.
- Download speeds are very good which was an initial concern, but I am downloading at 80% of max speed.
- And since it has come up before, the videos are downloadable and have options from 144p to 1080p.
- The content is quite unique and might be the biggest pro/selling point, will further this quite a bit in the bottom line.
- Subtitles on the scenes I've watched. There's also the setting to make the site's text in English.
- There's pictures and stills that are downloadable, but this will be in the cons too.
Cons:
- I hate to make this con since I can see they are trying to make things more interesting, but the different channels are confusing. Most sites that have "channels" have different content on them than what's on the main site. Channels here are, "Sex", "Casting", "Hints and Tips", "Documentaries", huh? Those are all porn scenes. A+ for effort, it's unique, but that's going to confuse a lot of people. Seems like Sex Art did something similar.
- The photos and stills, I think pictures would be a major plus on a site like this and they have picture sets with each video, but some have 4 photos in them. Some have 20. Some have 30. The stills are what the word says, screen captures from the videos.
- Last and this is a personal preference one, the women are Italian, European and they, in general, fit in that category of "hard" looking. The best example I've ever known of this look is Mya Diamond. I personally like it. But some won't.
Bottom Line:
I want to start by saying I've seen La Sublime XXX's webmaster asking about new reviews and want to say, I paid for my membership. I won't, however, let that alter my score as I'm going to be as fair as possible since they do seem to be genuine about trying to make a great site.
That's the thing, it's a great site. But there's several "buts". I find the models to be very attractive, but I tend to like models who don't look like they just stepped out of their 18th birthday party. Even the younger models on this site look more like women than say teens. Think Eve Angel when she was 18-19, she was a woman not a teen, at least not by porn standards.
The navigation and how to move about the content is easy to use, very clean, simplistic design, but if you go into "channels", you're going to wonder what in the heck is going on. I could be wrong, but based on looking at each "channel" it looks like they've stopped some of them which is a good idea. One is Backstage, one is Interviews, maybe the funniest is "Hints and Tips". Those are not bad at all. They have one of a woman showing how to squirt. They have one of a woman showing how to give a handjob. That's interesting and unique too. I think maybe Vivid used to do those, but haven't seen anyone doing that in awhile. I would keep those updating. I'm interested to see how many things there actually are! Then they have "Reviews" which is models testing and reviewing sex toys. That's interesting too. They have what looks like a one-shot 7 episode documentary with Priscilla Salerno, who I think is a very attractive model.
Where I think those become confusing is they are included in the regular updates/videos. They also have a "Best of" channel that updates in the regular updates/videos. For me, a one month member, I don't know if those are scenes that were once released just as a regular "video" then re-released as a "best of" and counted as an update? That's why I think the channel part is confusing overall. I counted the scenes the way I would on any site, multiplying the number of columns of updates by how many scenes are in a row. And do know that Interviews, Backstage, are included in those updates. Really, just typing that out made my head hurt.
I don't think they should stop the How To, Best of, but I do think they should stop tagging them as different from Sex Scenes.
The reason I went through all of that is by my count, there's just a little over 200 scenes on the whole site. If they disagree and have a different number, then my number is off because of the multiple unneeded tags/channels.
Moving on to the content: There's content here that I think members would if nothing else, find interesting. By interesting, it could mean sexy, it could mean sensual, it could mean humorous and so on. I'll give an example of a scene I watched earlier. The female model seems completely unimpressed by the male model and you have to know this happens in all porn, but they capture it and have her talking about it. It's bad enough that she's telling the guy to finger her because she's not even wet. By the end of the scene, she's talking about how he was much better than she expected and was making jokes about taking him home with her. There's a realness there. I have family that speak Italian, so I can understand most of it and there's English subtitles. Which is the really strong point to this site. For one of the first times ever, we have non-English speaking porn that has very clear English subtitles. It adds personality to the "foreign" women that we don't usually get to see or should say hear. And don't overlook those "how to" videos, the woman talking and explaining the steps, actually adds an excellent tease/erotic value to those scenes.
A few overall complaints before the technical parts:
The photo sets have to be bigger. Photo collectors are going to be very disappointed when there's 4 pictures from one scene.
Considering there's only one update per week, don't bring those interviews/backstage back, not if they're going to count as an update.
Outside of those, it's a great site. There's around 212 videos. Again, if the number is off, I'm just going from the videos link to count them. There's not a lot of backstage/interviews, maybe 15-20 combined. And while there's women here who I do know, like Simony Diamond, the vast majority are women I've never heard of. That's a big draw for me.
There is a "categories" section, so since I know we have anal lovers, there's around 60 scenes with anal.
The videos are downloadable up to 1080p, I download the 720p and they are very clear, I would go as far as saying excellent clarity. The files are not small. The 720p are right at 5000 bitrate. The 1080p are at 8000 bitrate.
I would recommend it to those who like Italian women especially and for those who like hardcore, but would like to see a little creativity thrown in too. I'll be back in about 6 months. Add more pictures and I'd bump it up to 90.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The upgrade package for Bang Bros, comes with 10 sites and this content, at one time, was stream-only, it's now downloadable.
- I tried joining directly through Dancing Bear, but the price was $29.95. If you're a member of Bang Bros, you add this package of sites for $19.95.
- Nice variety of niches in this package.
- Good download speeds, possibly from not as many members?
- Quite a bit of unique, exclusive content.
- Some fairly rare content if you're interested in certain niches.
- Has a party site, a Latina site, two college girl sites, a busty site, a solo site, an amateur site, a public site and a gameshow type CFNM site.
- Good navigation that's straightforward.
Cons:
- Back to the same problem as Bang Bros. The cancellation process is tucked away in the "library" link. Even worse, if you upgrade your Bang Bros membership to include this package, you now have two Bang Bros memberships listed in the options to cancel so you have to go through and cancel each one.
- None of these sites are updating and haven't been in over 2 years.
- The ads become a major factor once your regular Bang Bros membership has expired. You now can only access about half of the scenes on your browser window unless you want to rejoin Bang Bros.
- And the winner of the "are you fucking kidding me" award, there's another upgrade package! After joining this upgrade, a whole group of sites looking to be associated more with Middle Eastern models, including Mia Khalifa pops up.
Bottom Line:
I joined this upgrade package back when they were first offering it, guess that would have been 2011/2012. This review is going to be a bit back and forth.
The content here goes into unique niches that are rare. The party site, Dancing Bear, is by far the best of this type of content. They must have realized people were tired of bachelorette party theme and started shooting some of these scenes in sorority houses, in offices, and it does add a whole new dimension to the party atmosphere. The other big party site in another network, sticks to club, loud music, upwards of a couple hundred people. The Dancing Bear scenes have maybe 40-50 women tops and the strippers come out one at a time so you don't have a hundred different angles waiting for them to get that one hot amateur-looking woman.
I don't know why, but I love the CFNM Show content. I'm pretty sure I have a crush on the host of it. And she is involved in some of the scenes which makes it even better, but this was a very short-lived site.
College Rules and Haze Her are both very good sites as well. While the basis is a fairly-common one in porn, the girls, the settings, the laughing, giggling, makes both of these sites seem much more genuine than their counterparts on other networks.
There's the Brandi Belle solo site that is above average especially if you like Brandi. She's a very cute college girl in these scenes and it's somewhat setup to make it like she's auditioning the guys.
MyGF is an amateur site. I'd like to say all these are real amateurs, but I'm not positive of it. I noticed one Asian model who looks a lot like London Keyes, but these sets have the unique feel to them thanks to the additions of selfies in pictures, and what does seem like real couples.
Public Invasion is more or less a less risky version of the Kink public site. It's usually just a male/female outside having sex in the grass.
Busty Adventures is another short-lived site and it's what the title says except you know with Bang Bros, the average girl is usually busty, these are models that fall into the heavier/chubbier category.
Culineros is a Latina site that can be very good, but also very confusing. From the looks of it, Bang Bros had a dozen Latina sites they were trying to get started and most of this content isn't marked as Culineros, but it is included.
I saved that one for last because it can be confusing. The site is Culineros, but you'll see content from Sexo in Public, Mi Primer, Por el Chiquito, Tetangas, and this wouldn't be a problem except we all know how Bang Bros operates. Normally, if you download a scene from site that is not named on your membership, you are getting charged.
All the other sites in this package have the right site names on the scenes.
Here's some numbers: Dancing Bear - 128 scenes CFNM Show - 22 scenes
College Rules - 85 scenes
Brandi Belle - 199 scenes Busty Adventures - 156 scenes Haze Her - 54 scenes
MyGF - 179 scenes
Culineros - 450 scenes Public Invasion - 212 scenes
I'll mention here that Culineros, from the best I can tell and I'm dipping deep in my memory, these almost all look amateur Latina models. The content is very similar to what we used to find on Pacino's Adventures and is probably worth a join just for its content if you're into Latina.
I found the Public Invasion content to be rather tame, there's some risky content, but most of it looks like two people having sex in their backyard.
There's a downside here. This content isn't the newest technology, so the video quality can vary, but all the scenes I've looked at have at least a 720p option.
I think the upgrade is one of those that if you're into these niches and genres, you'll easily get your money's worth with a one month membership. I do think it's questionable for anyone looking for the newest resolution and professional camera/video work.
I'll end with the question I had: If you're a member of Bang Bros then add this upgrade, the upgrade does NOT end when your Bang Bros membership ends. You still sign in through Bang Bros, but you only see the sites in this network, which honestly, kind of surprised me. I was mainly joining to add some of the content lost in a hard drive crash, but did download a total of over 200 scenes, which is more than I've downloaded from a site in a long time. Definite recommend, but only one month.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
