Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of mostly reality porn type content, similar to Reality Kings, Bang Bros, etc...
- Good discounted price through TBP/PU
- Was careful about billing, if you join using Paypal, the biller is Epoch.
- Technical quality is high, 1080p option on every scene I've looked at it (as far back as I've looked 2012). Photo sets are small, but at least they have them in zips, most are close to 2000 long end.
- Download speeds are above average for me, about 75% of my max DL speed on pornsites.
- Seems to have some kind of reward program where you get to pick a "locked" site to open after 30 days of membership. That's almost a con since this site can be a bit frustrating to use.
- By my count, I have access to 27 sites and there's a couple more that are locked. The categories are fairly diverse, including a Japanese channel/site, a Lactating channel/site and a Cosplay channel/site.
- Looks exclusive to me, but I'm not going to guarantee it.
Cons:
- Navigation. That was supposed to be read like this ... "navigation, period." The site can be confusing. There doesn't seem to be a network hub site where you can search across the network, but if there is, it's doing a good job of avoiding me. There's a "network" tab. From it you pick through the different niches. Which will be con two below this one. Once you pick the one you're interested in, the search box only seems to work within that site/channel, instead of the whole network.
- The channels/sites are even confusing. Some sound like porn studios like Harmony Vision, Herzog Videos, while others are just named after their niche like Cosplay and Filthy and Fisting.
- You could spend a month just trying to find a scene you saw on your screen, 20 minutes ago.
Bottom Line:
I've considered joining Stiffia several times in the past since I do like the big reality networks, but I was always put off by the negative comments about frustrating billing hassles. Now that they have the option to join using Paypal/Epoch those billing concerns are gone.
My first thought as a member was, "What have I gotten myself into?" The site itself has a nice layout, clean, non-cluttered pages, but outside of just clicking on latest updates and scrolling through scene after scene, you're kind of stuck with figuring out their wonky search engine. I would fix these issues as simple as this:
Put a network search engine on every page.
Keep the search engine that only searches within one site/channel/niche. It's useful, it's just not real practical to a new member.
Put a network model search engine and again, keep the model search engine for each site/channel/niche.
It's not that big of a change, but it caused me to knock 15 points off my score. I spent way too much time trying to figure out what was what and what I was looking for. I don't think I've ever deducted that many points for any one con, but as you can see in my cons section, the navigation really took up 3 whole/different cons.
Once you figure out how to use the site, you've got yourself a real good network of porn. I just wonder how many people give up on it before figuring it out?
Here I go offering advice again. Merge some of these sites/channels together! I can't figure out what I'm going to find on each different channel. Give me a niche search or something. I just looked at a row of 6 videos, there's an interracial scene, two older women with younger men scenes, an anal scene, and two what looks to be amateur scenes.
Technical quality is very good. I've looked back into the older content and haven't found anything without the 1080p option. Videos are of good quality to my eyes. All kinds of hot models, including some I know of and quite a few I've never heard of. There seems to be a Greek/Spain influence in the models, but I'm not positive of that, just basing it on the female facial features and model names.
One more complaint: The videos have four download options. One option says, "Full HD (1920)", the next ones say "HD (1080)", "SD (720)", "Mobile (480)". Most of us know that 1080 is the height of a 1920x1080 movie, so why are there categories for 1920 and another one for 1080?
It's because they're labeled wrong. The "Full HD" is 1920x1080. The "HD 1080" is actually 1040x584 and the "SD 720" is 720x404. Which for lack of better word is confusing. I've always known 720 as 1280x720, which would still be bigger than the second option on here listed as "HD 1080". Maybe someone who runs it or does their programming doesn't know the difference in the resolutions?
Now that I'm done complaining there's still a really good network here. Problem is I'm as OCDC as anyone you'll ever know and these inconsistencies are going to pick at me until I don't like the network at all.
Normally, I would list all the sites and let the names of the different sites explain what you'll be seeing on those sites, but you can't with these "channels". Gonzo porn studios, reality porn studios, Japanese sex, anal, it's like joining a DVD site with no search engine or eating those jelly beans that are oddly-flavored and wondering if you just ate "booger" or "burger". Cue the Forrest Gump "life is like a box of chocolates" saying.
Still, the content isn't bad. Which is the point of joining a porn site. You have a nice mixture of younger models, older models, all the possible heterosexual niches and it's all in high quality video.
I've saved nearly 1,000 characters just to use for if I recommend it or not.
If you don't mind searching for good scenes, you will like this site. If things like crooked pictures on your bedroom wall don't bother you, you'll like this site. If your spouse leaving toothpaste stains in the sink don't bother you, you'll like this site. Better yet, if you have some extra time on your hands and like the idea of exploring the many niches (that's a big compliment), you'll like this site. As a matter of fact, if you sometimes feel like you don't get the most out of your membership to sites because you download everything you want in the first week, then don't go back, give this site a shot. I can all but promise you, you won't find everything you want in a week.
I'm trying my best not to be too negative here since I understand most people are not as easily-annoyed as I am. And I want it to be known that this site can at least to some extent, compare to the bigger, better-known networks like Brazzers, Reality Kings, Bang Bros, and their porn studio sites are comparable to most porn studios.
But I'm going to say despite my 84 score, I don't see me coming back to this site until they do something with the navigation, search engine and model list.
I was watching an old show of Howard Stern's. He brought these various women in and had them talk dirty to him and two of the other guys (Fred was one, maybe Jackie was the other). They then voted who did the best and the winner won a cash prize.
The girl who won was generally looked at as the least physically attractive. Her whole dialogue with them was based around what they (the men) wanted her to do to them. The other two women kept talking about themselves, like "Do you want to see me naked?" The winning woman would have said instead, "I want to slide my hand down your pants", as example.
Even though porn is a little different, I do think the overly-aggressive dirty talkers can be as bad if not worse than the ones who don't talk dirty at all. Eva Angelina (not Eve Angel) was one of my favorite hardcore performers for well over a year, but her constant jabbering, constant screams, constant oh God, oh God, oh God, oh God got on my last nerve. There's something better about a woman who comes off as not so much shy, but reserved, who then just says something dirty out of the blue.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the flagship sites of 21 Sextury.
- Quality is still high, options on video sizes are probably unmatched and a whole network of sites comes with it.
- Good TBP/PU price, but if you really like the content here then the TBP/PU yearly price is worth checking out at just over $60 for a year. Which is what I'm in my 6th month of.
- Still updates, but only about 5 updates per month over the last 5 months.
- Good navigation, can jump from site to site in the network, go through the model list alphabetically, by release date, etc...
- Especially fun for us native English speakers, they've now started mixing storylines in and most of the models speak some English.
- Model quality still is as good as any network in the world. Especially for the fans of mid-2000s Euro models.
- Good lesbian content, it's becoming a dying breed, but a lot of the Euro girls won't do anything but solo or lesbian.
- Good download speeds and billing is now handled by Fame, they're okay.
Cons:
- As a standalone site, Pix and Video, once one of my top 10 sites, is only average these days. At least when it comes to current content.
- They removed the tokens that everyone except me hated. I can't count how many free memberships I received thanks to those tokens.
- None of my favorite models are shooting new scenes. Oddly enough, I saw Sandy from Club Sandy on FTV Milfs.
- There's a pro up there about adding a storyline to their scenes. Lets just say it can be a con too. I give them credit for trying it and give the models credit for if nothing else, being cute, while trying to act in what isn't their native language.
Bottom Line:
A long time ago Pix and Video could stand toe to toe with any porn site on the internet. They had star power that many of the America-based sites couldn't have, like Eve Angel, Sandy, Sandra Shine, Sophie Moone, Mia Stone (someone should write a song about her, Stone rhymes with bone, gone). I'm guessing that's one of the downfalls of the porn industry. The models up and decide they want to go get married, have kids and give up modeling without any warning.
Now that I got out my whiny, becoming old part of my review, there's still good news and some bad.
I'm honestly probably too hard on these 21 Sextury sites. I think the network as a whole is still a good value, especially on a year subscription, but I still hate that these standalone sites end up being just a piece of the whole network. If I owned 21 Sextury, I would put all of the content on Club Sandy and Pix and Video. Those sites combined used to cost me $45 a month and I was happy to pay it, even multiple months. I didn't have to go through the hassles of a network. Hassles of a network:
Click on 21 Sextury network. Opens all scenes including bonus and compilation scenes. With my experience dating back over a decade with these guys, I just click on the sites within the network. So, there's a click for Pix and Video. I can now just see Pix and Video's content. But I need to go look at seven other sites, in the same manner and hassle, just to see the content that used to just be on Pix and Video. I have a life here, people.
The new content is good. I just don't see any of the newer models becoming the "next" (pick name from those above).
They're at least keeping up (no 4K) with the technical quality. Their newest videos have 7 different resolutions available, from 180p to 1080p. I didn't even know there was such thing as 180p. Those who like pictures will find quite a bit to like here. Roughly 150-200 pictures per scene, downloadable in zip files and here's why they stand out, the hi-res photos are right at 5000 long end. I still think that's impressive for a site/network that has done everything possible to become a video-preferred site.
The numbers just on Pix and Video are impressive, but I think it brings up a fair debate question. If you're running a network which would be better to say, "My network has 21 sites on it" or "my one porn site has 9,500+ scenes"? Which is what you're getting with the whole network.
Here's a rundown for anyone who hasn't ever joined it and is considering joining:
There's female solo, lesbian, boy/girl hardcore, fetish (foot and pee) and blowjob scenes.
The female solo and lesbian scenes are the majority on Pix and Video. It was a site to introduce new models and focus on their big star models in the mid-2000s.
The male talent varies, but you're still going to run into guys who were around way back in the early 2000s like Thomas Stone, who is in one of the newest scenes and back in 2002 was in one of Eve Angel's few b/g scenes.
There's no limits, videos are clear and is the case for most of the 21 Sextury network, have a warm color tone as do the picture sets. There's downloads for the videos and picture sets.
Models are generally younger (18-24), but you'll find some older models, especially in the archives.
There's very little diversity in race of the models. You will find a few black/biracial girls, but the sites are based in Europe and from what little I've heard, the sites would like to hire a more racially-diverse collection of models, but they're just isn't that much diversity available.
It's a good place to start your porn collection. It's a good place to become a porn hoarder, for example, Eve Angel has 144 scenes, which is 144 videos and 144 photo sets on the network. I'm sure if you find one or two models you really like you would be happy with a one month membership just to get all the content they have of your favorites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I think it's one of the better values in DVD sites, but you have to like the content, which can be on the harder side of things.
- Possibly the best navigation for a DVD site. You get to go through an entire process of elimination when picking tags until you find exactly what you're looking for.
- Video quality is very high, they're one of those sites that sometimes goes a bit overboard on the bitrates, but if you like high quality, it's here.
- Something I think pushes them ahead of other DVD sites is the vast majority of videos come with photo sets that are downloadable.
- Lots and lots of anal if that's your thing.
- Very diverse selection of categories. They've got everything from BBW to Bisexual threesomes to transsexuals to ... enemas.
- Many major porn stars are here. I would go as far as saying if they're a hardcore pornstar, they're on here. Don't hold me to that.
- Good DL speeds
- Fame billing, it's not bad and I've never had a problem with them.
Cons:
- Didn't take long for me to remember my boredom with DVD sites. It happens. The scenes are well-shot, the talent is top-notch, but if you're not careful you'll end up feeling like you've seen it all before.
- If you're going to be downloading the 1080p videos, the majority of them are well over 2 GB, some go as high as 4 GB.
- Screen can be a little cluttered from the main page, but it's not because of ads, it's just they cram a lot of content on each page. It's like a double anal penetration happened.
Bottom Line:
I think Evil Angel is bordering on becoming a mainstream site. Which is why someone would tell potential customers to make sure and look at some of the content before joining. I personally like a lot of it, but there's some of it that's pretty offensive. Especially if you don't like gaping or spitting into buttholes, a gold medal awaits Evil Angel if that ever becomes an Olympic sport.
I join Evil Angel once a year for one month. Their content falls somewhere between Kink and mainstream hardcore. They're very good about shooting a scene with at least some kind of theme to it and I would even say they have overall high production values, but there's not a lot of difference from one scene to the next unless you jump to a different category/niche. That's okay though. It's a DVD site.
For a long time, I opted to join the VideoboxEvil Angel channel, but I've probably said this before, if you do that, you're missing out on a lot of content. This site blows the VideoboxEvil Angel channel away and it's just as cheap. At this point, I'm even a little surprised that VB still has the Evil Angel channel, since I believe Evil Angel is a competitor to VB.
I mentioned it in the pros, but always like to point things like this out. Each scene/video has a photo set with it to download. There's a lot of those photo sets that are very good, even sometimes better than the actual video.
Navigation should be used as a template for DVD sites, and if I'm not mistaken, it is the same navigation the Fame Digital sites use. You click "category", a huge list of categories pop up. You can then do something like this, mark "Asian", "Teen", "Anal", "Handjob" and it will bring up all of the scenes they have that have all 4 of those in them. It's very useful when trying to find your way through all the content.
According to their search engine they have roughly 14,500 videos. They update with 4-5 scenes per day. If there's any one complaint here it's that the very newest scenes can't be downloaded for a few days. Not for sure why they don't just put them all together and release them at the end of the week.
While I think Videobox is one of the best places to start a porn collection, I'm not for sure I could say the same for Evil Angel. It's a much better join if you've already joined and bored of the more mainstream sites like Videobox. But if you're into the harder content, I like to think new Porn Users aren't, but if you are, then you would be better off starting your porn collection right here with Evil Angel.
One last thing, I find their pricing to be one of the worst. They constantly flash that $39.99/monthly price, but you can get this site for 66%-75% less than that. If you paid $40 for it, I really don't think you'd get your money worth, I sure wouldn't, but at $10-$15/month, it's a very good value. I'll recommend it for anyone who thinks their sexual interests and desires are darker than the average person. Then after those people, anyone who is bored with mainstream porn, even though, be warned, as said earlier, I think Evil Angel is becoming closer to mainstream unless you're willing to dig deep into those categories and find something truly unique.
I have bought a few vinyls, but only because they're special editions available only on vinyl. I rip those to high quality digital files. I did recently buy my uncle a Denon turntable to replace his old one, but I personally don't have a turntable.
We listen to music in our house roughly 95% of every day. I haven't adjusted to the peace and quiet of a smaller city and can't sleep without some kind of noise. My preferred one there is Sleep Like A Princess (no, I'm not kidding), it has a nice guitar tone similar to Santana's music.
My music collection has reached areas of the unknown. I'm over 3 TB now with pretty much every possible genre covered. I'm actually more obsessive about music than porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's probably the greatest picture porn site on the internet. I consider it slightly intimidating to review.
- Very pretty models.
- To my knowledge, the technical quality (picture resolution) is unmatched.
- The photo sets can be downloaded in zips.
- Advertises 4-6 updates per day. It's been 4 per day during my current membership.
- Good download speeds that seem to choke up and slow down on some sets.
- Considering the size of the site and the overwhelming amount of content, their navigation is very good and often surprises me with how good it is.
- The scenes themselves have become more "adult" or I should say "nude". You rarely see a set now without full nudity.
- Strong network of sites also can be purchased with Met Art.
- The locations of the shoots are often as pretty as the model.
Cons:
- The videos are a complete waste for me. They're usually in the 10 minute range and are usually just of the model rolling around on a bed naked, walking around naked or posing.
- I'm assuming a new porn fan is reading this and needs to know, there's no intercourse, no blowjobs, no double anal penetration to be found anywhere on the site. It's a site about pretty girls being pretty and naked. And yes, I think for many, that's a major con.
- I really wish they would get rid of those cam ads. It takes up roughly 1/3 the page.
- Site itself can be a bit wonky. I've had it close for no reason, refuse to remember my login, store my old login so I login to an account from 2011 and I still think they try too hard to get you to buy an upsell.
Bottom Line:
There's few sites that I consider intimidating to review, Met-Art, might be at the top of the list. First, there's so much content there's no way you're going to see all of it in a month or even a year. Second, even though it doesn't show as much with me as it does with other PU members, I really like pictures. Third, if I was to complain about something that bothers me it's the way the site presents its content and shoots/produces its content.
The reason the photo one bothers me is if I just reviewed it from just what I think about the site, it's going to get a very high score. But ... I don't think their pictures are the best. I prefer FTVs pictures and some of ALS Scan's too. Complaining about how the site produces or presents its content is just a subjective opinion. In a few words, it's a little more artsy than I like.
Then there's the big one. The videos still aren't worth downloading. I think that should be the biggest question you ask yourself before joining Met-Art. If you're strictly a video person, you're going to be disappointed and wondering why everyone scores this site so high. I think for me, it's that I always loved the old porn magazines, but not the tame ones like Playboy. Penthouse was a borderline one for me. I liked Hustler, Gallery, and a few other more obscure ones that showed full-nudity and penetration of fingers. Met-Art does a very good job of recreating those classic magazines in their photo sets. If you think you would enjoy that, then this is a definite join site.
Technically, the newest photo sets are nearing 6000 long end, there might even be some that go over 6000, but I've not seen them. Still, 6000 long end, is big enough to count the fuzz hairs on a model's butt. This is where one of my only complaints about the pictures comes into play. Some of the photos are blurry when viewed in the largest size. I don't get that near as much with FTV or ALS Scan.
Their presentation and style of content can be described this way and it's not about every single set, it's more of an "in general" than blanket statement. It's like when you're younger and see this beautiful girl who smiles at you. You are so excited to go out with her then you go out with her and there's no chemistry, her personality is flat, dull. I normally wouldn't make a comparison like that, but Met-Art is the one site I've always had a slight problem with because of its presentation. For all of their uniqueness, being a photo-heavy site, trying not to be vulgar, it's like the sets become interchangeable. I'm not even for sure this word really fits here, but I would call their content "linear". And I think you have to accept that before you can really enjoy their content. Their photographers, in my opinion, take their work, direction, flow of their photo sets, very seriously. For a long time, I avoided Met-Art because I found the content too similar from set to set.
Now though, I join it once per year and download any of the new sets/girls I like. It took a long time to sort my collection from Met-Art and get it to the point, where I only needed the content from one year. It makes the membership more enjoyable and less frustrating.
The models are generally very pretty, slim, a few have bigger builds, but most are slim. Most of the models are white, which is a bit of a problem for me, not so much from a PC view, but just because I like the different physical features each race has.
They have improved one thing I have complained about before. A lot of the artsy photo sites like to start each set with the model fully nude. Met-Art was very bad about doing this. Now, you'll see quite a few of the newer sets starting with models fully clothed. I've always believed my problem with models starting fully nude was based around my own fantasies of seeing what she looks like with her clothes on then comparing how she looks nude. But I now think it was more to do with their older sets starting fully nude, but not showing pink or buttholes. It would be 120 photos of trying to hide those things. They've improved that, I think it's brought more personality out from the models than the old style allowed.
I really can't convince myself to raise the score any even with the change to more sets starting clothed. I've now been a member on Sex-Art, which Met-Art owns and I prefer it. I also prefer ALS Scan, which Met-Art is partnered with. Other than that, I would think for someone who prefers pictures and hasn't been on many other photo sites, this Met-Art site could easily represent your "100" site. I feel like I'm defending my stance of only giving it an 88, but it shouldn't stop anyone from trying it out, unless you prefer videos by a large margin. I consider myself about 50/50 on photos and videos. If you prefer pictures, add 8-10 points to my score. If you prefer videos, subtract 8-10 points from my score. As an ending compliment, Met-Art is one of the few sites I wouldn't be surprised to see rated a 100.
I wish it had been a lot better. I'll sometimes look over those smaller sites, newer sites that wouldn't rate very good, but one with the Hustler name has to draw a lot of attention just from the name. I sometimes forget we're into a whole new generation of porn users.
I'm always surprised by how many people haven't seen it. My wife, who loves Christmas movies, had never seen it. It's now her favorite. Hard to believe, but I can still remember reading Jean's book back in maybe 9th grade, then watching the movie a few years later and trying to remember where I had heard the stories, in the movie, from.
My favorite is The Christmas Story. After that one, I mostly like the older, traditional ones like It's a Wonderful Life, White Christmas type ones. I've never watched Scrooged or the Grinch movie, have watched and like the classic cartoon one. Bad Santa could have been better. I thought they tried too hard to make it the anti-Christmas movie that tries to be a Christmas movie. And believe it or not, I've not watched any of the Chevy Chase "Vacation" movies.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hustler, in my mind, the greatest name in hardcore porn.
- Huge site/network. I've seen some content as far back as the 80s, including the legendary, "Deep Inside Vanessa Del Rio".
- Hustler magazine pictorials to look at or download.
- Updates once or twice per week with a full DVD, it varies, so there's no way to put a set number on it or set frequency.
- Beaver Hunt category! My favorite section of Hustler magazine.
- Good download speeds, roughly 70% of my max speed.
Cons:
- A couple of my pros are actually not what they claim to be. Trust me, I'll go into in the BL.
- Video quality is below average at best.
- I once rated this "network" an 80, in 2007, here on PU. My average score is an 85.
- I thought, based on many of the professional reviews, that Hustler had got their site together and improved it. I thought wrong and wonder why it scored so highly in professional reviews. Not looking at that can of worms with a can opener.
- It's not a network. It's a DVD site that puts content, based on category, into a separate category that they so happen to call a different site.
Bottom Line:
Back when I first discovered porn it was a random VHS tape belonging to my uncle. I later found a whole stack of Playboy magazines under his bed. I'm sure I liked them and thought I had found a gold mine. Then, one day, I found a Hustler magazine in his room. I used multiple loud adjectives as I looked through the pages. So much nakedness, girls with fingers stuck in places, it was far greater than anything I had seen before.
When I turned 18, I had been psyching myself up to go to the local gas station and buy a brand new copy of Hustler. It then became a monthly habit. The rush, as I've told a few times, was maybe even greater than the magazine. This made Hustler my absolute favorite name in hardcore porn. And like most men who bought Playboy or Penthouse, I also read every story in Hustler. The jokes were tasteless and hilarious. Then there was the "Beaver Hunt" section of the magazine. It had used-submitted photos in it. Hustler would then pick the best one and give them a money prize. It had the dirty stories in it. Some seriously interesting political stories.
So, a few weeks ago, I thought I would join Hustler's website. It had been 9 years since I joined it. From everything I've read it's improved greatly since then. I joined ... and reality hit, buyer's remorse hit and my first "bad" review in a long time is now being posted.
First, in the categories is "Beaver Hunt". I click on it, it's DVDs from the Barely Legal series. It's not a bad series. It's also not "Beaver Hunt". I was honestly expecting user-submitted photos.
I then clicked on "Magz". I'm going to get to view all the digital issues of all Hustler magazines, right? Wrong. They only go back to 2007. Now hell, if you can put 1986's Deep Inside Vanessa Del Rio DVD on here, you can damn sure put the old magazines on here. It gets worse. No Beaver Hunt in the magazines that I could access. No joke section. No articles. Instead, a handful of pictorials from each magazine with 12-15 photos from each pictorial.
I cleared my head and decided to make the most out of what was quickly becoming the most disappointing porn site I have joined in years. I downloaded a few videos featuring models I like. They were okay, but were a bit blurry/fuzzy. Now these are newer models (Nicole Aniston, Veronica Rodriguez), maybe not "newer", but newer than Vanessa Del Rio. I look at the properties on the videos and see 960x540 resolution. These were downloaded from the "super quality" link. I go back to the available sites and enter "Hustler HD". Download the newest video available, it's 960x540. What the hell? It says HD in the name! I admit, I don't follow the resolution wars of porn, I prefer 720p and consider it the lowest level of HD. So my standards aren't the problem here. I can't imagine what someone wanting 1080p or 4K would think of 960x540 being listed as HD.
Disappointment continued, I went through every site on their "network" and downloaded the newest video they have. Not a single one had a video over 960x540. I stand slightly corrected by myself. I just found one DVD with 720p scenes on it, it's of Asa Akira.
Here's my roundup at this point: Beaver Hunt "site" is not Beaver Hunt. It's Barely Legal DVDs.
The magazines aren't magazines. They are 4-5 pictorials from each magazine.
The high quality videos are below average 960x540 quality. Including the ones on the "site" Hustler HD.
But wait... there is a hustlermagazine site that says it has all of the magazines in digital form. How do I know? It's advertised on every page of this Hustler site. Now back to the layout. You enter the site into a sort of hub. It shows 19 available sites in the network. A few examples of the names, Beaver Hunt, Daddy Gets Lucky, Asian Fever, those sound like real standalone sites that are part of a network, but in reality, those three are in order ... Barely Legal series, the Daughter series of DVDs, (including Barely Legal again), Asian Fever is their commonly-known DVD series' Teen Thailand and random scenes taken from DVDs that feature Asian models.
The further I looked into this Hustler site I started noticing chances to "upgrade" my membership. There's a problem there, why would I upgrade something that hasn't been the least bit entertaining?
The site needs a complete overhaul. Advertising as Hustler with "magz" should include all magazines and every part of those magazines. Advertising HD video should result in HD video. Neither of those said on the membership join pages, "Must upgrade to receive HD video and full magazines". A new search engine would help. Surely there's some 720p videos on here, but I've yet to find them. A simple search engine with an HD filter would do. It receives a 60 simply because it works and has porn on it with many big name stars. I'm guessing the higher def videos are included in the upgraded membership, again, the upgraded membership is not mentioned or offered when you join. Not recommended.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A fairly early version of FTV's take on the MILF genre. Content is being added by the week.
- Same FTV quality as expected. The videos all have 1080p option, picture sets top out at 4000 long end and are downloadable.
- Here's a big plus, there's some models here that are over 30, who I've never seen or heard of.
- Navigation works perfectly, it's the same as FTV's navigation on their other sites and because there's not a lot of content, it's really easy to get around to the content there is.
- Download speeds are in my excellent range. I download in my 90% of top speed range.
- Bills through CCBill
- Very good and limited tagging system, also used on FTV Girls.
- Very happy with the photo sets, most of the models have 3-4 different photo sets (different clothes/location) and in total they are 200-400 pictures of each model.
- Last pro, mainly because I think it will need to be mentioned in cons too. There's hardcore here, meaning boy/girl sets...
Cons:
- There's hardcore here. I don't consider this a con, but I've known a lot of members through the years who believe these solo-type sites shouldn't have men in them, so I thought I would mention it.
- And if you don't like FTV Girl's split video scenes, you're not going to be happy to hear that feature is on FTV MILFs too.
- A small amount of the content is from FTV Girls
Bottom Line:
I think many of us have waited patiently for the new FTV sites to be launched and this is one of them. Here's the good things:
I'm a huge FTV fan. I love the public exhibitionism, the amateur feel of the models, the way FTV sets up photography sets, the quality of the videos. I've also preferred models 25-35 for nearly my entire PU-life. So this site could be everything I've been looking for in a porn site.
The split videos are here. Yes, I've argued, debated and complained about them on FTV Girls, but their webmaster is set on them and he produces content I like so I'm adjusting. I'm still taking 5 points off for it, but if that doesn't bother you, go ahead and add 5 points to the score. Think I took 8-10 for it on my last FTV Girls review. The other "problem" is the filename system. It goes 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06 in each and every set. So, here is my fix that I've been using:
Create a folder of the model's name. In that folder make new folders for the number of sets/scenes the model has. For example, model name, set one, set two, set three, etc... Then use a download manager that allows you to save roughly 20 videos at a time and adjust the folder they are saved in to correspond with the set folder they belong in. By doing this, you offset the filename problem since there's only one 01, 02, 03, 04 in each folder.
One of the best changes the FTV sites have made in recent years is the tagging system. I personally think it's the most useful tagging system I've used. Why? Because it's very simple. The tags are:
1st - Never been in adult before.
Nu! - Public nudity
O - Real orgasms
Dil - Dildo play
Fet - Unique, fetish content
Ex - Extreme content
BB - Naturally busty girl
HC - Hardcore content, boy/girl
SpG - Sporty Girl, includes athletic content.
To top off this handy tagging system, they then list what fetishes, how far the model goes, what act of public nudity, etc...
I think every site should go to a similar tagging system.
Overall, there's a good selection/percentage of 1st time models. By my count, there's 75 models and 23 are 1st time models. There's a fairly decent mixture of body types, but there's not a lot in the way of different ethnicity. I still think finding 23 "MILFs" who have never filmed porn is an impressive number and here's the advantage. The MILFs are more confident than the teens. A lot of the 1st time teens are shy, even backwards and you can tell they have to really push/pull the models to get them to even be comfortable on camera, let alone to be confident on camera. You don't see that as much in this content. Most of the models look like/act like they want to be naked and want people looking at them.
I usually won't do this, but a model that just blew me away on FTV MILFs is Lexi. She is one of the younger models on this site at 28, but she's 5'9" 34E (natural), 26 waist, 34 hips with long, blonde hair. She's one of the few models I've ever seen that I would call stunning. And it's her 1st time on video. Maybe that's where we're at in porn these days. Used to I wanted to see a young model do her first masturbation scene or hardcore scene. Now, I kind of like the idea of the model being late 20s, who has never tried nude modeling, doing her first ever adult video. There's a believable anticipation from these older 1st time models, as if they've wanted to do it all their lives, but are just now getting around to it.
That, to me, is the strongest part of this content. There's something more genuine to it than most porn. Not to write off the teens, but I think even when they're genuine it's just to tease us old men. It makes you wonder how many of these models were told by an ex that they weren't sexual enough or weren't as sexy as the teens their exes watched in porn.
Having said that, there's still not a ton of content here ... yet. But the potential is higher than any site I've been on in a long time.
By my count, based on removing the FTV Girls content that somehow made its way onto this site, there are:
65 sets from FTV MILFs
10 sets carried over from FTV Girls (most of these are 1st time models)
Each set has 200-400 pictures and 1-2 hours of videos.
Of the 65 sets, 13 have hardcore (b/g) parts.
Model ages range from: 24-45, there's one 24, one 26, nearly all the rest are 28-45.
I've long struggled with most porn content. The model is the focus to me and I like models who can arouse with more than their natural, born-with body. Some might call it seduction. Eve Angel stayed my favorite for nearly a decade because of how she looked into the camera. Most of the models here also have that strength. Most of the teen models look at the camera like, "What are you going to do to me?" The models here look at the camera like, "You'll never believe what I'm going to do to you."
I took 5 points off for the split videos and 7 points off for value since it's a small site. Having said that, I can see this becoming my favorite site and a potential high 90s site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network based around multiple fetishes.
- I'll go out on a limb and say this is a network with sites that used to be standalone. The big draw for me was Jerkoff Instructors. It's on here, hasn't updated since 2015, but I lost this content in an accidental hard drive purge. I don't remember it being part of a network when I was a member before.
- You're sure find something you like on this network and probably something that offends you too.
- One of the prettiest, best laid-out sites I've ever seen, but sometimes it does run slow and takes awhile to load.
- There's new updates, but it's not exactly easy to find them.
- Download speeds are very good.
- Goofy, campy porn. Kind of reminds me of 90s porn except they're really trying to convince you of the scene. It's a nice change of pace.
- Pretty models throughout the network.
Cons:
- Where in the hell are the new updates? I have to scan through every single site to find the newest scene from each site. It's not exactly the most user-friendly site.
- You kind of feel like there's a really rich 19 year old who owns this network. He sees October on the calendar and says, "Lets do a Halloween themed site!" Then it stops updating after 8 updates.
- Got me to join for a month, but no new updates on Jerkoff Instructors will stop me from joining again.
Bottom Line:
A few years ago, a site named Jerkoff Instructors became one of my favorite sites. It's a site that features pretty models, sometimes in hose (no panties), stockings (with panties), leggings (no panties). The models then tease, strip, sometimes masturbate and talk dirty to the viewer. It's good content. It's even now fairly unique content. You not only get the tease, panties, see-through hose fetishes in there, but also get the dirty talk fetish too. That was my reason for joining this network. I cleaned out my hard drives last year and mistakenly deleted all of the Jerkoff Instructors content. Bought myself a 4 TB external recently and wanted to add this content back.
The annoying thing about this network is it has a lot of potential. Someone working on this network has a pretty impressive programming background. The site is pleasant to your eyes, content loads as you scroll and they go for high production values, but they have ADD. No direction. No consistency. It really reminds me of that rich kid in college who is extremely smart and talented, but can't make up his mind on what he wants to do. An enigma, if you will.
Several of the sites try to take the angle of the dominating male against teen girl, but they're not rough enough to make it that believable and they're not offensive enough to make it believable either. And the girls are in no more danger than they should be, but they can't even act enough to convince you they are.
I can't really complain about their quality though. They have some 4K scenes, again, I don't have a 4K monitor so those don't matter to me, but they're there.
The majority of the sites do look similar to Kink sites. And are named like Brazzers sites, Teens in Woods, Teen Creeper, Helpless Teens, Brutal Pickups, but that's not to say there's nothing here worth looking at.
I not only appreciated being able to get all of my Jerkoff Instructors content back, but I also found their Footjob Addict site to be very good in a dying niche (It no longer updates either). Strap On Squad is another one I like. It's kind of like Kink-level lesbian scenes, but it stopped updating in September.
I should mention there's lots of tattoos on the models. I've been up and down the debate on tattoos on models and really don't mind them, but I know some people do.
This is my opinion on how to enjoy this network. You have to spend an hour or so finding the sites you like on the network. Once you do that, you can just select the site and download what you want. Until you do that, the network as a whole is a navigational mess. Down the whole main members page is a section for each site with a couple of the site's scenes. Up top in the navigational bar there's a tab for "sites", that's the most useful one. You can then go through each site and find the content you like. If you click "all videos" instead of all of the videos opening up with newest ones first, which is what 99% of sites do, you get a dropdown menu that asks what kind of video are you looking for. The choices are for example:
UHD - Teens,
HD - Bondage, Teens, Foot Fetish, Maledom, Femdom SD - Pretty much the same as the HD ones with a few more added.
If I click "all videos", why is there a dropdown selection box? Shouldn't "all" videos come up? It's again, frustrating. So just stick to using that "sites" tab and go about navigating the network that way.
There's also problems with the way the sites are counted/listed. Just a short explanation:
On the main page it shows 11 sites.
Near the bottom of the main page it shows 15 sites.
On the "sites" tab it shows 46 sites.
Get it together people. I tried to find some kind of logical reasoning behind the differences, but there's not any. Jerkoff Instructors is listed on all three of those locations and it's not updating, so it's not as if the "featured" sites or "top" sites are just newer sites that are updating.
Having complained pretty much throughout this review might make it sound really bad, but if you use that "sites" tab, you'll find quite a bit of unique content that you'll rarely see in this high of a number in quantity. Which should be their selling point to new members. A lot of the sites don't update anymore, but the content a lot of the sites have is content you rarely see. I ended up downloading over 75 GB in 3 weeks, which is quite a bit more than I've been downloading from other sites, at least recently. There's content here that I looked at and thought, "I might want to see that niche one day. I've not seen it anywhere else." I definitely wouldn't recommend it for anyone looking for mainstream content. The newer stuff is more mainstream, but the older stuff is where the value is.
I would recommend it to anyone who liked the Jerkoff Instructors since you can get all of its content here. Also those who are looking for something different. To me, it's a safe join for one month, but wouldn't recommend anything more than that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A fairly large DVD site with exclusive content.
- Good TBP/PU discount
- Though it's not a big selling point for me, they offer nearly every niche in porn.
- Site navigation is very good, but they do seem to have something going on that slows the site when first loading it.
- A new scene (video not full DVD) added daily and every scene I've looked at has a photoset which is not a separate planned photoshoot, but instead, just stills of the video. They can be downloaded in zips.
- Download speeds land in the "good" area for me which is about 75-80% of my max speed.
- Some rare scenes you won't find anywhere else. For me, there was two Tera Patrick scenes I had years ago, but had misplaced or lost them.
Cons:
- I think the biggest con is that the site can be a pain in the ass. I had left the site, came back to it maybe 10 minutes later, had to sign in again and fill out a captcha. Only to find out my login info wasn't right. I tried three more times and it kept rejecting my login. I reset my password. Signed in, my browser (Firefox) stopped responding. Had to force close Firefox. Reopened Firefox, had to go through the whole login process again. I don't know if they have Java running or what, but whatever it is, it's annoying.
- The always con of joining a DVD site. Things get boring and samey-samey after awhile.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member on this site multiple times over the years. Despite being a collector of specific models, I still do like to download random DVDs with pretty girls I've never seen before. I'm admittedly tired of Videobox and Videosz, so I thought I'd visit Fame Digital again.
First and foremost, there are two Tera Patrick scenes on this site that I love. I had both of them as far back as 2009, but since then, a couple of moves and transferring content from smaller hard drives to larger ones has led me to losing some of my favorites, including these two Tera scenes.
The numbers here aren't as impressive as the two bigger DVD sites listed above, but there are advantages. The content is mostly exclusive, which is generally considered one of the biggest cons of DVD sites.
By my count there's 5,964 scenes dating back to 2006. And nearly 500 transsexual scenes as well.
The navigation is good. You will run into some strange results if you mess around with the settings and searches. The Tera Patrick "site" for example, only has a couple pages of Tera, then it starts putting random female models in the other scenes.
A fun one for me is the Silverstone DVD section. Silverstone, at one time, was one of the premier studios for Europe's top-tier models and you'll find some collector-type content in those. Including Sylvia Saint scenes from 10 years ago.
Admittedly, I've been tired of seeing Rocco Siffredi's content for years, but I know there are collectors of his scenes. There's over 500 of those Rocco scenes. Some of the newer ones are pretty good. He's finding models I've never seen.
There's a section called, "Daring Sex" which looks like pretty normal porn.
Maybe I sound like it's pretty dull, but it's really not. I think I just get agitated with these networks that try to be a network when they're really just a site broken in categories (that try to act as sites). I don't know that I would recommend this site as a site to start a porn collection with, but would recommend it to those who have been a member of Videobox and/or Videosz, but are looking for some new content.
Which is a strong suit here. Not only do they offer a fairly large transsexual collection, they also have the m/m/f bisexual scenes that are almost unheard of on straight DVD sites. I've always believed scenes like these separate DVD sites and appeal to a broader audience. That makes the TBP/PU price even better since you can see some content you probably wouldn't normally search out and do so without spending much money.
Overall, I would rank it close to Videobox and Videoz, based solely on the exclusive content they do have. It should be mentioned some of the Devil's Film DVDs are easily found on Videobox as well. I would put it even with smaller DVD sites/studios like Lethal Hardcore and maybe even ZTOD. It's a good value for the cost.
Beware the cross-sale on the registration page, it was about 3 seconds from getting me, but I saw it over in the right margin right before submitting my order. A good join for a month or two especially if you're looking for rare scenes of specific models.
I really think Kink should run some kind of promo for a month just to try and promote their network more. The rest of those listed already fill my inbox with "flash/you won't believe this deal" sales.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I've probably joined this network as much as any. It's got enough variety to make it good for a one to two month join.
- 16 sites included, there's underlying themes to each of the sites and admittedly, they do sometimes overlap, but there's still a lot of content here.
- Maybe one of the strongest points to make is there really isn't a set flagship site like a lot of networks have. Will go through numbers in BL.
- Good but not great download speeds.
- The vast majority of videos are offered in a minimum of 720p and the videos of the last five years nearly all have 1080p. It can vary slightly from site to site.
- I like the word unique and it fits here. Even though it should be mentioned that unique doesn't always mean you're going to like all of the content.
- Pretty good navigation, but there's that model count problem which I'll list in the cons too.
Cons:
- As with all networks, there's some smaller sites and will go into in BL.
- A lot of the scenes on this network feature many people, as many as I'm guessing, 100+ in the Party Hardcore scenes. They have quite a few models in their model list that have over 50 videos, but I'm guessing they're counting any appearance in a scene as a video count number. Will have an example in BL.
- It will always be a problem that I just don't think can be fixed. There's too much action going on in most of the scenes.
- Another one that's not a terrible con, but scenes are broken into parts, sometimes as many as 6 parts. Reason being, the scene parts are as big as 2 GB each, meaning if you downloaded the full scene you're looking at 12 GB and up.
Bottom Line:
I was first introduced to this network back when it was called something like ErroMax or something like that. I have a strange fetish of imagining my wife or back then, girlfriend, going to a club or party with friends, getting tipsy and going a little too far with the male entertainment. I'm a little perverted in my fantasies. Maybe even a little twisted. I've always been from the belief that fantasies are for our darker thoughts and desires. So Party Hardcore was a big draw for me, much like Dancing Bear from Bang Bros, was.
I'm going to list the sites and will put the number of scenes out from them. Party Hardcore - 500 scenes updates weekly Drunk Sex Orgy - 1,375 scenes updates monthly Cum Squad - 54 scenes updates monthly, but has had some long lulls, as long as 2.5 years of no updates between 2011-2014, but has updated monthly every month in 2016. Pee Squad - 43 scenes updates monthly All WAM - 720 scenes updates weekly Fully Clothed Pissing - 500 scenes updates weekly Fully Clothed Sex - 500 scenes updates weekly
My-Fetish - 184 scenes hasn't updated since 2012 Pissing In Action - 512 scenes updates weekly Mad Sex Party - 144 scenes hasn't updated since 2012 Tyrannized - 146 scenes hasn't updated since 2011 Slime Wave - 318 scenes updates weekly
Party Softcore - 5 scenes hasn't updated since 2011 Orgasmatics - 158 scenes hasn't updated since 2014 Pornstars At Home - 441 scenes hasn't updated since 2014
Leony April - 164 scenes hasn't updated since 2013
That gives them 9 active sites, 5 archive sites.
It's worth mentioning here that some of the numbers don't look right to me. This is especially true on Party Hardcore. The oldest scene available is from 2010, but I know this site has been around much longer than that. That I know of, this network has been through 3 name changes, Orgy Max, Erro Max and now Tainster, so there's a possibility that some of the older scenes belonged to another company and have been removed. Still, there's a ton of content overall.
My biggest problem with the network is the model list. I think another PU reviewer mentioned this as well. A name that I just recently mentioned in a DDF review was Zuzana Z, she's now a seasoned veteran of 15 years in the business. She's listed as having 86 scenes and she does have 86 scenes, but some of them are alternate views like "cam 2" and "lesbian cam" and there are some that are part 1, part 2, part 3, as example, that counts as 3 scenes, even though the parts are from the same scene. It's a relatively small complaint, but it's a little frustrating for a collector.
As is the poor file-naming system. Many of the videos have the same file name so I have a bunch of these 720pfullcomplete(1), 720pfullcomplete(2), that's fairly old school and time-consuming to fix.
Also should mention that Fully Clothed Sex and Fully Clothed Pissing are the same scenes, just the Pissing one is focused on the pissing segment. I won't take anything off for that since people who like pissing scenes might not want to see the rest of the scene.
Of course, the nicest thing about this network is the price. I once paid upwards of $40 for this network, it was maybe $29.99 in Euros, back when the Euro's value was much higher than the dollar. Now they've just gave it a nice discounted price and it becomes one of the better values for your money networks.
I would think those who are into pissing would like this network. Those into dressed women having sex. And as mentioned earlier, those into using the orgy scenes as fantasy material for your own twisted perversions. I do think they have a few sites they could get rid of. The Slime Wave site is a waste to me. It's a dildo that squirts "cum" all over the models and it is one of their weekly updates sites. The All WAM site also has never interested me. I don't get the attraction of seeing dressed women throw food on each other. I should have mentioned that WAM means "Wet and Messy".
But Party Hardcore is still going strong as is Fully Clothed Sex, which has become my favorite site on the network. The other draw here is for those looking for something different than the norm, but not really ready to try the Kink-type sites, it fits nicely in that in-between area.
Last, I always try to do this for collectors. It's always been surprising to me, but they do have a lot of big name Euro models on here. Simony Diamond, Zuzana Z and an old favorite Tea Jul too, just to name a few. Some of Zuzana's scenes really surprised me since they involved her pissing on men, women and men and women pissing on her.
It's a good join for a month or two, depending on how much time you can dedicate to it. It certainly doesn't come off as a budget network as its price to content amount would suggest.
A bunch in sports. All of which are now in some landfill.
A few from work. Buried under the sports awards.
And a few from some kids that are still hanging on my fridge.
If I had to pick something it would be being hard-headed through most of my adult life. Grew up fairly poor. Got a huge break in college sports. Messed it up, but I got degrees. Forgot where I came from. Had multiple older male and female friends who tried to help me reach my potential, but I wouldn't listen. Thought money = happiness, was the true measure of success and was all that really mattered.
Then ... one day, I got bored lol. I'm sure it had been building for years, but it was like an overnight change. Found happiness. The only regrets I've had since are the repeated times I've heard, "You know you could have been this happy 10 years ago?" Nope, I couldn't have been. I had to do it the hard way.
I lived in LA for 30+ years. I think that's all I need to say lol. Go to Tommy Burgers to get a burger and fries, see boobs and butts. Go to In-N-Out Burgers, see a little of everything. Go out to Pico Union District and see alternative, artsy girls parading around nude against furs and bras. Go up to West Hollywood and you'll understand why that girl's skirt is bulging in the front. For some reason that made me think of Charlie Sheen.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The flagship site of my personal favorite network.
- I originally reviewed 1byday, here on PU, way back in April, 2007. Gave it the same score, but everything else has changed.
- Includes network access to 7 other active sites and 6 inactive (not updating) archive sites.
- The quality is easily some of the best on the internet and it goes beyond just the resolution numbers with DDF content.
- I've seen many different prices, but I joined it last year for a year membership price that was very good and cheap.
- Despite 1ByDay being part of a network, it alone, updates 4 times a week with a photo set and video. The network as a whole updates twice daily with a video and photo set included in each update.
- Very good download speeds.
- 1ByDay is more or less a supersite for individual models, so there's lots of solo content here.
- Epoch is the biller
- Zuzana Zeleznovova and Mia Stone, two of my favorite blondes have their best work here. And lots of it.
Cons:
- Zuzana Zeleznovova, Eve Angel, Mia Stone, Anetta Keys, just to name a few of my favorite models that have a ton of content on 1byday ... have all retired.
- Well, I complained about it on the Club Sandy review, so 1byday used to update twice daily. Though it was in theory and name only supposed to update once per day. It now only updates 4 times per week.
- Current models just aren't what they used to be. That's not to say they're all bad, but I used to download every new update, now it's more like 1-2 per week.
Bottom Line:
Years ago, DDF and 21 Sextury competed head to head for mine and many other people's money. About 5-6 years ago, I would have advised others to go with 21 Sextury, but not anymore. It's not so much a dropoff at 21 Sextury as it is, DDF's sites continually improving. I hate to go into an area that pulls in personal preferences, but DDF has stuck with their guns or maybe more applicable, they've left with the person who took them to the dance.
The reason I joined 1byday/DDF for a year was because of a major external hard drive crash. I lost over 1TB of DDF content. I don't spend as much time on the PC or downloading porn as I used to so I figured a year membership would be good for recovering all the lost content and checking out the newer models too.
1byday continues to produce content that isn't very different from the content they were producing over 10 years ago. It's mostly softcore, masturbation to orgasm, very personal videos and photo sets. This is still my overall favorite genre of porn, but it really is dying off. Which is why 1byday still receives a 94. Most of my old favorite sites/networks have become 95% hardcore. While I believe my taste in porn has changed as a whole, I still do like to see the pretty young women in clothes, then stripping, then masturbating. And overall, I think 1byday alone can fill that niche for me.
If you're unfamiliar with some of those models I named above, but like solo porn, then do yourself a favor and try this site/network out. Check out those models especially. DDF, the man, not just the network name, before retiring, brought out the best (worst? naughtiest?) in Eve Angel, Zuzana Zeleznovova (especially Zuzana) and the incomparable Mia Stone. If you love solo porn, the scenes of just those 3 are well-worth the membership price. Which is the good news, there's roughly 2,400 other models besides them.
There's very little bad news. Seems like the pricing could be a bit of a hassle since I've seen the network listed anywhere from $9.95 a month to $29.95 a month. I seriously am considering just letting the year membership I have recur for another year. It's still cheaper than any of the promos I've seen.
1byday is easily one of the biggest Euro model sites. It has over 4,000 scenes. Each "scene" includes a downloadable photo set and video. And they were doing full 1080p HD as far back as 2010, so there's thousands of videos in HD. Though, as I've said before, I prefer 720p and they also offer it. Their videos and pictures are clear, not nearly as touched-up as other similar sites and the videos are sharp.
I think once you add the network sites you have the best overall value in porn. Much like 1byday has stayed true to its roots, the other sites included have also stayed the same as they've always been. You also don't see as many dead sites here as most networks and maybe more importantly, the sites that are inactive on DDF include a couple that were solo models who retired, so there's no fair way to complain about those.
I think this shows it best.
The smallest active site on the network has 609 scenes. Six of the 8 active sites have over 1,000 scenes. So they have 8 very successful sites in their network. And one of the archived sites has over 800 casting videos on it.
But there's no doubt that 1byday is the site that made this network possible and at least for me, has me considering a 2nd year membership. I really can't say that for any sites anymore.
I'll end by saying I'm probably not completely fair towards the newer content. I'm very understanding towards porn sites being limited to the crowd of potential porn models to hire, but so many of the newer girls and scenes don't live up to the older scenes. It's completely possible that's because their older models are my favorites.
Having said that, some of the newer girls have caught my attention like Cindy. Even so, there's still some old favorites coming back to like one of the newest updates that featured a longtime favorite Simony Diamond.
Continuing in my positive talk of this site is the different ideas used over the years. Very few worked that well, but at least they try. One of my favorites was the split-screen video of models masturbating. It was a unique perspective that other sites/networks have gone on to use it a lot. Then there's one of the greatest scenes ever recorded, Zuzana Z from above, outside, with red hair (after being a stunning blonde for years, very softcore model), grabbing a chainsaw-type device that had its saw/chain removed and replaced by a large dildo. Our once innocent, sweet Zuzana went on to use that powered dildo on herself out in the open until she orgasmed multiple times.
That's it. I've tried and tried to explain what it is I look for in porn and I really believe the uniqueness, the act I've not seen 1,927 times (public exhibitionism not included) and it's what I think DDF does best out of the Euro networks.
I'm a seasonal eater.
Favorite meal in general is steak, baked potato and salad.
In the fall/winter I lean towards Italian foods, especially lasagna and various pastas.
In the spring/summer I usually prefer lighter foods like salad, big sandwiches.
My wife says my eating habits are the most boring part of me. I go for months eating the same foods on the same days of each week.
A natural, pretty but in an unique way woman. Neither weight or height really matters ... okay, there's a limit somewhere, but I think the "unique" part is more important to me than anything else.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I once rated Club Sandy a 99. I feel like me giving it an 82 is a generous nod to nostalgia.
- The site is still updating, but only twice a month. It used to update daily.
- The included network access still makes this a good join for the TBP price. BL will go into this since I'm in a year long subscription.
- If you are a collector of certain models there are plenty here with large archives of content.
- Lots of remastering of old scenes. I consider it a pro since I've seen scenes as old as 2007 that are remastered into 1080p.
- Lots of compilation videos. Those could be a con for some, but they are pretty good for discovering models you might not have realized you like.
- Good download speeds, very consistent.
- Picture sets, downloadable as zips, still come with each scene, but they could make it a little easier to find them.
Cons:
- Two updates per month. I'll never understand the point of having a network that kills off your best-known sites.
- Navigation is best described as clunky. It's worst described as what the hell are they thinking?
- Content split between three networks. And they've removed their previous token system that at least allowed you to join the other networks to get that one or two rare scene you can't find on your hard drive.
- Where's the creativity 21 Sextury used to have?
Bottom Line:
I've been hanging onto year-long subscriptions to 21 Sextury and DDF Network for 9-10 months. These two networks have been longtime staples in my porn rotation. The complete dropoff of Club Sandy is a disappointment for me, but not all is lost. I'll try to stick to the good parts then add the bad parts to explain the disappointment.
If you've never been a member here and don't know much about Euro models, then this is a great place to start. The star of Club Sandy, Sandy, has always been and still is one of the prettiest, most erotic European women I've ever seen in porn. The site and network is loaded with her content. Including compilations, Sandy is featured in over 500 scenes. Blue Angel, Eve Angel, Zafira, you name them, they too have 100+ scenes on here.
That's where a problem comes up. The big Euro models were mostly from the mid to late 2000s. Following their departures, they've yet to develop many major stars. So, joining this site and network is more of an archival join. I would like to say the newer content (2013 forward) has some great content, but most of it just comes off as cookie-cutter hardcore porn. My point here is if you've been a member before and still have the content on a hard drive, I'm not for sure there's much reason to join.
The remasters aren't listed as remasters so you have to look for them. One I really liked was an early Blue Angel scene from 2007 that has been remastered into 1080p resolution with 6000+ bitrate, it looks very good. My one problem with the remastered videos is there's no in-between. You can either download the old version, which was 540p or jump all the way to 1080p. I almost always prefer the 720p videos, but the remasters don't have that option.
You really can't complain about the quality here, but you can complain about the newer videos being just like the one released earlier in the month and those are just like the two released last month, this goes on for several years. On top of that, you have the three network split of content. The way they've handled the splitting of their network should be used to show why you shouldn't start changing how things work.
Where I know I'm being too hard on them is the lack of Sandy content, I think she retired a few years ago. Maybe the length of my membership has made me feel like there's just not enough to keep me interested without the "old" models?
Back to the positive:
While they used to be known for removing some scenes, it now looks like they've added all of them back. Including the very rare Eve Angel hardcore b/g scene in a bathroom from early in her career. I've also noticed some older Sophie Moone scenes I hadn't seen in years. Biggest problem here is you have to know what you're looking for so that could be frustrating for new members who don't know about the older models.
I still believe it's worth joining since you do get access to the 21 Sextury network, but I really don't think it's (the network) is even coming close to the DDF network these days.
The good news is the newer content is all shot with the 1080p option. The bad news is a large percentage of the new content is anal/hardcore/boy-girl. As soon as I can re-review the network as a whole, I will and don't see it rating much over an 85 as a whole. Lots of good older content here, some in poorer quality, but still featuring some of the best models in the world.
To end, I think if you're new to the network it's definitely worth a join ... for a month. I wouldn't recommend the year subscription to anyone as I don't think the newer content is even close as good as the older content. Also recommended to collectors, especially if you don't have the remastered older videos. Just make sure the videos you're looking for didn't get sent to 21 Sextreme or else you'll need to join it too.
I could live without television, but wouldn't want to. I used to watch a lot of college football, but have realized I can follow the game on my phone and not have to sit and yell at the television. I admittedly like Duck Dynasty and watch it on DVR. Which explains most of my television watching habits. I'm from a family that didn't talk during dinner. So I'll turn on the television and watch something while eating. Then my wife and I will watch a series at night, usually Netflix or Amazon Prime, we're deep into Walking Dead now.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I'm going to guess that this network is the biggest interracial network on the internet.
- It's also has some of the longest-running interracial websites included with it, including Blacks and Blondes, which has been around for roughly 15 years.
- Has what I consider to be the best Gloryhole site.
- Download speeds are very good. Right around 90% of max.
- Quite a few sites are included in the network that I'm pretty sure used to be standalone sites, so it's kind of rare content.
- Good mixture of female models. Most are above-average in looks and play their roles well.
- Very good quality, 720p from 2009 to 1080p starting in early 2012. Most scenes have downloadable zipped photo sets as well.
- Navigation is very good for a network.
- Epoch as the biller.
- Quite a bit of reverse interracial (stereotypical), with black girls being with white guys.
- Large amount of content, will detail in BL.
Cons:
- I've always said the name of this network hurts it more than anything. Can you imagine the look on my wife's face when I said, "I joined Dog Fart Network"?
- Stereotypes are in abundance here. If you're a politically-correct person, socially-touchy person, you're probably going to have a problem with some of the content. I personally find most of the content to be humorous and playful.
- Probably the only real complaint is that the network could be organized a little better.
- There's a download limit, but I haven't hit it yet. I've went as high as 12.5GB in a day without hitting it so I'm not really for sure if it's a con or not.
Bottom Line:
This was only my second time as a member. The last time was 10 years ago and it was only to Gloryhole, which was a standalone site if I remember right. I've always been fascinated by the Gloryhole concept. We live near a university that was supposedly one of the first reported universities to have Gloryholes in their bathrooms.
Nowadays you get Gloryhole.com and quite a few more sites. I'm going to mention this since I recognize some of these sites included in the network as what used to be solo model sites. Models like Spring Thomas, I always thought she was a solo model and her site has been around since 2003, either way, there's 6-7 of those type of sites that look like they were once solo sites. So if you're a fan of any of those models you're in luck with this network.
Now, here's my big reason for liking this network. The Gloryhole content is just more believable here than any other I've seen. And on top of that, your membership also includes Gloryhole Initiations. Those two sites are enough for me to join and be happy with my membership. The two combined have around 900 Gloryhole scenes.
But there's other sites here worth checking out. As mentioned earlier in the pros, Blacks on Blondes is one of the oldest interracial sites on the internet. I remember seeing their content and the Dogfart logo on TGP sites back in the early 2000s. Admittedly, I haven't and won't download much from Blacks and Blondes since it's very common, mainstream porn, but there's over 700 scenes just on that site alone.
I do like We Fuck Black Girls, which goes into the role-reversal of typical interracial porn. You just don't see a lot of black girls in porn these days, but they have 50 scenes on this still actively updating site. The newest update with Jenna Foxx is one of my favorite scenes.
There's really plenty to like here. While not all sites are updating and some are just updating once per month, they still are pushing out updates on average of every other day. I will say I took a couple points off because there's 4-5 sites that are on the border of looking like they're going to stop updating (no updates in 30+ days).
I'll also say their navigation is very good. You have a main network hub that shows all the sites and how much content each site has. Once you click on a site, over in the upper-left corner is the name of the site. You can click that and go to any other site in the network from there. The scenes come up in order of newest to oldest, 5 per page and over on the right side is a jump to page link, which allows you to jump back to any page you want without having to push back buttons or "more" buttons. It's very good and other networks could learn from it.
Here's a list of the sites you get with a membership, how many scenes they have and I'll list if they're still updating:
Blacks on Blondes 765 scenes, still active. Cuckold Sessions 173 scenes, still active. Gloryhole.com 565 scenes, still active.
Blacks on Cougars 87 scenes, no updates since July 2016. We Fuck Black Girls 49 scenes, still active. Watching My Mom Go Black 84 scenes, still active.
Interracial Blowbang 87 scenes, still active. Cum Bang 81 scenes, still active. Interracial Pickups 75 scenes, still active. Watching My Daughter Go Black 53 scenes, no updates since June 2106. Zebra Girls 54 scenes, still active.
Gloryhole Initiations 313 scenes, still active.
Black Meat, White Feet 40 scenes, no updates since June 2016.
Several of those above sites are on the border of being inactive. I counted 5 of those that haven't updated since late August, which puts them right at a month without an update, but maybe they'll come through with those. They seem to update in bunches.
These are the sites that look like they're updating, but I think they're just recycling old content. Main reason for thinking this is the video quality is 720p at best and the clothing, televisions, looks upwards of 10 years old. Spring Thomas, Katie Thomas, Ruth Blackwell, Candy Monroe, Barb Cummings, The Minion and Wife Writing. These sites have a combined 750ish scenes in addition to the sites listed above. There's also two gay sites included, Blacks on Boys and Gloryholes and Handjobs. There's right at 400 scenes on those two sites combined.
It's definitely a network worth looking at for a month or two, especially if you're into the Gloryhole scenes or Interracial porn.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
