Might be hard to believe, but I've not seen any of these movies. The movie I remember being mainstream, but had one of the best nude scenes in it was Fast Times at Ridgemont High with the fantasy scene of Phoebe Cates getting out of the pool. I'm pretty sure that scene sped my puberty up by a year or two.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A somewhat hectic, completely perverse site that I've yet to figure out, which at least means it's unique.
- Update schedule is erratic, but they still have a fair amount of updates. So far in September there's only been two updates, in August there were 3 updates and July had 5, so there's no strict schedule, but there's still updates.
- Is part of the Kink Network and stands out for being not nearly as genre-specific as the other Kink sites.
- I would think this appeals to fans of BDSM, role-playing, bondage and voyeurism.
- Fast download speeds, around 90% of my max.
- More amateur interaction than any site I've seen. Will explain below.
- There's a story in most of the scenes and some of the models return to continue their previous stories. It's really not that great, but at least they're trying.
- Navigation is iffy, but once inside The Upper Floor site and away from the network, it's a lot easier to use.
Cons:
- I want to put this first because most of the TBP reviews list these sites, including this one, as having picture sets for downloads. There's no picture sets whatsoever. Not for browsing or downloading.
- These Kink sites are easy to nitpick since they usually are repetitive (by nature of staying true to their genre), but The Upper Floor is different. It's like a mixture of Sex and Submission with the live aspect they've used on several of their sites which includes a live audience, mixed with a renaissance fair that provides sexual stimulants to their guests. It's in the cons because I don't get it. Maybe it's just too far-reaching for me? It's not a big negative, but when you become used to things being perfectly clear then you get a site that you can't even figure out the basis for it becomes a con.
Bottom Line:
The Upper Floor is my least-liked site on the Kink network (boy/girl content).
One of its biggest strengths is most of the people in the scenes are in costumes or if you want to say, non-typical everyday clothes. It's a strength since I either can't tell the amateurs in the audience from the pros in the action. This creates the closest I've seen to a believable public orgy. I could see a bunch of hippies in San Francisco dressing up like miscast medieval characters, getting tipsy, then getting naked and having an orgy. There are believable crowd interactions in the scenes. Many of the women that end up touching a female model or even fingering the model look like regular, everyday receptionists. I'll continue to tap into my imagination and believe their boring daily lives are repressing them sexually. They go see one of these live sex shows on The Upper Floor and lose all their inhibitions.
That's also the problem with the site. I like structure, order and discipline. Hectic is a four-letter word to me. It's kind of like watching a television series by starting with season 4, episode 7 and trying to figure out why you're seeing what you're seeing. You'll also see this with the update schedule. There's no pattern, no "X amount of updates per month/week/day".
The action on this site is mostly good, pretty normal for a Kink site.
And this is my take on what the site is about. If I'm wrong, it's okay, it's my take on it. The males are supposed to be these powerful, rich men who the females want to be slaves to. They have these various competitions like "who cums first loses". The loser then faces some kind of punishment. These scenes are usually shot in a room with 10-15 people. But then there will be scenes of one man and one woman in a closed bedroom.
There's lots of anal sex, quite a bit of throat-gagging and as said in the opening of the pros, perversions. The one big plus for me in the action is when those amateur-looking girls step in and start getting involved in the action. The rest of it comes off as typical hardcore porn in 2016 with an extra dose of bondage/clothespins. Maybe it is like a combination of multiple Kink sites into one?
Either way, I don't think it's enough reason to join Kink's network, but the other sites included with the network make it a good join. With The Upper Floor being a fun diversion from their usual sites.
One of the first porn movies I watched was "Taboo". I think it was supposed to be a real brother and sister. The taboo of the step-family is there, but I think it's very important that producers consider casting on these. I don't have any trouble with using fantasy and imagination when watching porn, but the producers could still do better. For example, I've seen the same guy play a stepdad, stepbrother to a dozen or more female models. I've also seen female models that have shot scenes with a guy only to later see another scene with him listed as their stepdad or stepbrother.
I've almost joined this site no less than 5 times. They have several models I really like, but haven't seen anywhere else. Think I'll put it on my list of sites to join.
You deserve an award from Wittyguy's end of the year PU awards. I think you're the first person ever to say I scored a site lower than they would have lol. On that, I've never been able to use the scoring system properly. My brain doesn't understand the difference in an 74 or 78 or 84 and 88. My average score is around 85, so by putting it at 84, I was saying it's a little below average at this point. Oh and on the 85 average, I've only reviewed a few sites below a 70, so I generally look at my grading scale as 70-100, instead of 50-100. I think I spent way too many years in college classes that graded on a curve.
On canceling, back in 2010 or so, hardly no sites ever had a cancellation link on their site. It's why Epoch and CCBill are so popular. They both have their own websites where you can enter your subscription number (comes in welcome email) and email address. CCBill or Epoch will then look up your account and let you cancel it from their website. There's several newer payment processors that don't offer this option. The one Brazzers uses, Pro Biller, or something like that, wants you to either live chat, email or call them to cancel.
If you end up liking this network, you could check out Cum Louder, it used to be Spanish-only and is shot in a very similar style as this one. Much like this one, Cum Louder, has a few sites that are knockoffs of Brazzers/Bang Bros themes, but usually with amateur girls.
Glad to have helped. I liked this network good enough to upgrade for $15 to the unlimited downloads.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Oh my goodness. A Kink network!
- Regular price is $49.95, but I've seen several email promos for as low as $29.95.
- This might be the greatest site in modern (internet) porn history.
- You'll never get through this network in a month. You get access to their listed 23 sites, but there's more content on here than those 23 sites. Will go into in BL.
- Download speeds are almost always very good through Kink sites. I'm downloading at 90% of my max speed.
- I'll all but guarantee you there is something here for everyone. Straight, Gay, Transsexual, Role-playing and Robots.
- I'll go into the amount of content in the bottom line. It's comparable with any network out there.
- I've said it when reviewing their sites before, I think they have the best overall production values of any studio. Fun, creative, goofy and raunchy.
- Two of my all-time favorite models have tons of content on this network, Isis Love and Dragon Lily.
- Search works well, but...
Cons:
- The one big con is the navigation. I consider myself a veteran of Kink sites and know most of the model's names that I like. So I just enter their name in the search box or the site title. It works well for that. Others might not know anything about these models or sites. They're in trouble. As is their mouse's scroll wheel.
- Somewhere along the way, among the 23+ sites, you're sure to be offended by something.
- Photo sets have changed and are now pretty much useless.
Bottom Line:
A Kink network. I wouldn't have believed it if I didn't see and join it. It's maybe understandable. Most of the Kink sites have slowed on their amount of updates, which is what seems to happen to every site on a network these days. I know they've had a few legal problems too, but even with the slower updates, this network has to be one of the best buys, if not the best.
The funny thing here is, I'm not really into most of the harsher genres, but I'll get in the mood for something different and join one of their sites. I'll say by far and away my favorite scenes of theirs are the live ones. There's not a ton of these live scenes, but there's enough to fill up an external hard drive.
But, there's still some sites they've left out of the network. And there's some not listed in your account that you can access from searching for them like Kink University.
The first scene I clicked on that said, "Buy Shoot", made me realize I still didn't have my "100" site. It's still close, but if I join a network I don't expect to have to pay to access other parts of the network.
By my count there's roughly 13,000 videos on this network. To put that in perspective, it's nearly double the amount of videos that Brazzers network has. No slight meant to Brazzers, but they are generally considered one of the largest porn networks on the internet.
Here's a nitpicking list:
I've never known Kink to produce 1080p videos. The largest resolution I've found is 720p, but there's probably good reason behind that. One of the videos I downloaded for this review at 720p, has a 5,000 bitrate and is 77 minutes long, making it nearly 3 GB to download.
They used to have pictures with every scene, but these days I don't see any pictures.
The navigation is very important considering they do have 13,000 scenes. As it is right now, you start scrolling with 20 scenes showing up, then you click more and get 20 more scenes. There is an alternative of going to the actual site/genre/channel you're interested in. That at least makes it easier to scroll through the scenes.
Another tip is to go to the TBP listing and look at the sites included. It shows 23, but at least 4 that are shown on the TBP page do not have a "channel" on the Kink network, but you can enter their names into your url box or click the TBP link to them and they are included too. By my count there's 29 sites included.
My thoughts overall on this network is it has everything needed to be a 100 site. The bad news is, Kink isn't well-known for fixing navigation issues, so those might always be a problem. Even so, this is a massive network with some of the more taboo subjects, plus it should appeal to those who like heterosexual, gay and transsexual sex. I don't know of any network that does that.
If you're used to mainstream porn some of the content here will make you uncomfortable. I struggle with anything that looks abusive, but there's a lot here that shows the models enjoying themselves. Some of their more risky sites have toned down some like Public Disgrace and the BDSM sites, but it's still harder than anything you'll see in a mainstream DVD. Also more creative and sometimes even funny.
And if there's any major bonus from these scenes it's that you might learn some new things to try with your significant other. A big plus for me is you don't get a lot of the goofy "sex talk" seen in porn these days. Some of those overly-talkative girls make me wonder why someone hasn't put a ball-gag in their mouth.
Now for the big question. Is it worth staying around for more than a month? I think so, but I don't know for how long. A lot of the sites I like are either not updating or only have 2 new updates a month. As far as recommending it, I would to any porn fan. Sometimes I think being made uncomfortable is a good thing. On the other hand, there's enough regular sex with just a few props added to appeal to anyone. It's the highest score I gave in a long time. I will review a few of the network sites that I believe are reasons to join the network.
Guess I should admit I'm the "other" one. But it was way back when I was a teenager and we'll leave it at that. And at what Pat said, it was taboo. I was a bit of a risk-taker back then.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A different site than you'll usually find on a network.
- Really is a large site considering it's part of a network. Has nearly 1,000 scenes on it.
- Has been around since 2007, but even so, the oldest scenes have a 540p option, 720p and 1080p came soon after.
- DDF's network is easily one of my favorites and it's sites like this one that's easily missed that makes it a great network.
- Despite the content looking to be fairly hardcore to fairly extreme, it's nearly all very accessible to the average viewer.
- Averages one new scene (video + pictures) per week.
- Very good photo sets included with each scene and are downloadable in zips, biggest problem is similar to many other sites, not enough pictures in the sets.
- Around 7-8 MB/s download speed which is on my higher end.
- Excellent navigation, it looks a little cluttered and maybe it is, but it works good.
- Your chance to see some of your favorite softcore models getting a little kinkier than you're used to seeing
Cons:
- DDF's network has had struggles for years now with scene counts. Those are still around. In one place, House of Taboo says it has nearly 1,200 videos, in another it says 990.
- To be honest, if you're looking for something that's a little harder than your average mainstream porn, this will do the trick, but if you're looking for scenes on the level of say kink.com, your expectations will fall short.
Bottom Line:
I admit, when DDF first launched this site I was surprised. I mainly knew DDF for pretty, glam sex, solo girls, pretty clothes, perfect make-up, then out of nowhere came House of Taboo.
I want to stress this point, this is not a good alternative to your favorite BDSM site or your favorite Kink site. That's not to say it's tame, but it is very controlled. One of the biggest selling points is there's models on here that you wouldn't ever see on a Kink site or a BDSM site.
I've wondered if many people even know this site exists. It's never really received a push from DDF, like One By Day, Hot Legs and Feet or even Eve Angel Official have received, but it's sort of a hidden gem on what is already a great network.
Here's some of the things/genres you can expect from this site:
Bondage, both with ropes and wraps.
Somewhat forced insertions, large dildos, sticks.
BDSM-style outfits, rubber suits, rubber masks
Dominatrix (usually only with another woman), including collars, blindfolds, ball gags.
Roleplaying, Doctor exam, jail prisoner.
Spanking and ... peeing.
I know some might consider anal sex to be kinky, but I think in 2016, it's become too much of a norm to be included in the above kinks.
The technical quality is excellent. As mentioned in the pros, the oldest content has 540p videos with 720p becoming standard by 2009 and 1080p becoming standard in early 2011.
I think this site would appeal to anyone that collected the glam Euro models from the mid-2000s. One of the most surprising scenes for me is of Zuzana Zeleznovova. She was one of the most softcore, pretty, almost innocent models I remember from the mid-2000s. On this site, she has a scene where she's bound in chains and pees on herself. Might not sound that extreme, but it was for her. Maybe the most shocking for me is a scene between Eve Angel and Jeny Baby. Eve plays a nurse role, while Jeny is strapped into a straightjacket. Eve proceeds to use a speculum on Jeny, stick various objects, including fingers into Jeny's butt and dominates her. Which if nothing else is funny if you've followed Eve's career as the sweet model who becomes devilish when horny.
The newer scenes don't seem to have as many well-known stars in them and there is a sudden influx of tattooed models, but they still stay true to the different genres.
I consider this a site worth checking out before joining DDF Network since I don't know of any other mainstream network that has anything like House of Taboo. I will say 21 Sextury used to, but after splitting their network into two sites, most of the more extreme sites ended up on a different network, which is why I'm leaning towards preferring DDF's Network. This site adds a nice balance to the network. I mean, we all know we get tired of looking at perfectly made-up, tanned, natural models having sex and need something different ever once in awhile.
My only real complaint is that you can tell some of the scenes are controlled. Sites and networks that specialize in BDSM and the kinkier genres of porn have learned how to make their scenes look less planned.
Great overall site though and one any DDF member should check out, if for no other reason, to see if any of your favorite, usually not too kinky models are doing something you've never seen them do. Would rank it as the third or fourth best site in the DDF Network and one worth joining the network for even if you've got most of the content from the other sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A good-looking network that can't seem to make up its mind about what language they speak. This review is for the premium network included with Chicas Locas not just Chicas Locas. They go by the name of porndoe, but couldn't find a hub page to review the network on.
- Good introduction TBP/PU price of 9.95, but should be noted I was charged in Euros not dollars, which was $11 and some change.
- Several interesting and underproduced genres are included in the network.
- Models are mostly younger, 18-25, but they have a few much older models as well. Reminds me a lot of Reality King's style of models. Lots of Latina models that look to be amateur, at least I don't recognize them.
- Blazing fast download speeds at 8MB/s on my connection. I can sometimes get up over 9MB/s, but 8 is very high for me on a porn site.
- I'll go into the numbers in the BL, there's quite a bit of content available for the 9.95 price.
- Navigation is good in some places and just terrible in others.
Cons:
- Here's the big one. If you join for 9.95 you're limited on how many videos you can download per day. TBP lists 3 per day, but the site now says 5. If you join for 24.95, you receive unlimited downloads and 8 more bonus sites.
- Well, some site names are Spanish, I think others are German at least I think it's German, French and English too. They have a button to switch the language to English, but that doesn't change the site names to English, so you have to click on a site and check it out to figure out what genre is.
- Centrobill came up as my payment processor. Those people get my card rejected and cause my bank to send me a text about suspicious activity. Luckily, after rejecting my payment, Epoch came up as the secondary payment processor and approved the same card.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those blind joins I usually hate. I saw it in the new site listing on TBP and decided to give it a try since if nothing else it has amateur Latina girls on it.
I'm admittedly torn on this review. This network has tons of potential, but they use an upgrade system. Get in for 9.95, but if you want to download more than 5 videos a day or want to see all their sites, you'll have to pay another 15.00. It's bad business. Hit a middle ground on the prices, make it unlimited, you'll save yourself a lot of headaches.
What's great about this network is the quality. The videos have up to 1080p option and some of them have as high as 14,000 bitrates. I prefer the 720p which has 8,000 bitrates, but that's because I don't want to download a 4 GB file. One of the 720p files I downloaded earlier was over 2 GB, nearly 50 minutes long. I like the camerawork they use. It's very similar to Bang Bros and Reality Kings. The girls aren't all perfect. You get a blend of slightly chubby, very slim, tall, short, pretty, not so pretty, young, old and so on. This is my preferred style of models on a site.
The navigation overall isn't bad. I know zero models on this network so I went to the model list and just scanned through until I found ones I liked. It has a few good features like the ability to click on a model's name then you can see all of her content on the network. It has a "network" tab that opens up a page with all their sites on it. That's good, but what the hell is a Hausfrau Fricken? Looks like frathouse fucking? It wouldn't hurt to put an English translation under the site names that are not in English. What about a XXX Omas? Does it mean many orgasms? The navigation on the content pages could also be better. As example, La Novice, which I guess is French Amateurs, there's a section with 12 videos, 6 per line with an arrow to open up 6 more scenes on each line. Then down below the scenes it says, "Channel Pornstars". Huh? Beside of that it says "Channel Albums". What? And beside of that it says, "Related Channels". Dude? In all seriousness, I understand what those mean, but why are they floating around in the content area? Isn't there a tab at the top for all sites and pornstars?
On a side note, there was no cross-sales on the join page and there's no advertising in the member's area. It's like they tried to give you too many ways to find the content. Some advice from an old porn reviewer, keep it simple. It gives me and others less to complain about.
The videos are good. I've watched quite a few and liked them. You can download the photo sets in zip files, but they're nothing too great. They're only 1080 on the long end. Maybe the download speed is thanks to them being a newer site with fewer members. I consistently go over 8MB/s on downloads.
Their overall numbers of scenes is pretty good, but I doubt I'll download more than 40-50 scenes total. Picture set downloads do not count against your daily limit of 5.
Some numbers as of 8/29/2016:
Over 500 models, but it's impossible for me to count them all since they include male models in their model list. Still, I would feel safe saying there's 400+ women models, of note, they have a whole site dedicated to older models (both men and women) so there could be a whole section of models you won't like if you don't like older or vice versa. My age cutoff limit stops at MILFs. I love grandmothers in real life, but they've no business in my fantasies or sexual thoughts.
23 sites, not including the VIP sites. Some of these sites are very small (30-35 videos).
974 listed scenes across the network. From the best I can tell that number does not include the VIP sites or photo sets, but this is where the annoying navigation comes into play again. Where's a filter button?
Should have mentioned earlier they have a site that works nearly identical to Bang Bus called Bums Bus. What I do like however is innocent lesbian sex on their site A Girl Knows, which doesn't even seem like it belongs on the network. The Chicas Locas site has what I would consider amateur Latina girls, which is a dying genre and one of my favorites.
So, overall, I think the network is good, above-average even, but I think the next year will play a huge role in how it develops. If they continue to shoot the same kind of porn as now and work on their site (navigation, cleaner interface) they will eventually catch up to the Reality Kings, Team Skeet, type networks. After saying Team Skeet, I would compare this network to it as well, especially in Team Skeet's earlier days. I don't regret joining for the 9.95 option, it's opened up my eyes to a new site I had never heard of. Good blend of genres as well. They even have a tranny site and on top of that, they aren't using the same dozen guys you're used to seeing on the American networks. It's hard not to recommend it since I believe it's worth the price and they look like a good alternative to the American networks.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An often overlooked site that's genre could also cause it to be looked over.
- Despite now being a network site it still delivers 4 updates per week (pictures/videos) in each.
- Has a huge catalog of content, over 2,500 scenes.
- A strong pro for me is it has the foot and leg fetishes involved, but there's also plenty of sex, pretty posing and everything you'd expect from a hardcore site not a foot/leg fetish site.
- Very good quality videos, 1080p videos date back to 2010-2011 and are still in every update.
- Photos can be downloaded in 3 sizes, topping out at 2000 long end and have been and still are some of the best photos you'll see.
- Has the added bonus of being in a network that covers nearly all genres.
- Download speeds are above-average and consistent.
- Navigation is as good as you'll find on a network, though you'll still run into the occasional glitch.
- Archive dates back to 2001, you'll find nearly every top Euro model on this site.
Cons:
- The price without the TBP/PU discount
- Fetish content always carries the potential of being repetitive.
- A small percentage of the foot/leg scenes won't go beyond foot teasing, leg flirting, etc...
Bottom Line:
Way back in the old says of online porn (early 2000s to mid 2000s), DDF sold this as a standalone site and it cost a premium price, seems like $30 back then per month.
Things have changed. I think it's both a good thing and a bad thing in this case. It's easy to see how someone would avoid this site since they might think it's a lot of toe worshiping, toe-sucking and so on. I'll say ahead of time, I'm not into feet, but this is one of my all-time favorite sites. I've always liked hose, fishnets on women and there's all kinds of those scenes on this site.
There's plenty of hardcore here as well as lesbian action. There's a smaller amount of solo and and even smaller amount of tease/very softcore.
The models, as with most Euro sites, are almost always very pretty ... at worst. DDF's sites aren't quite as glam as they used to be and that's now a plus for me. It used to would have been a negative.
The amount of content competes well with almost any 100% exclusive site. Over 2,500 videos, over 2,500 photo sets and the videos have the 1080p option and have for the last 5-6 years.
So, why should someone join it if they're not into feet and/or legs? Simple. The leg and feet category was one that Viv Thomas, DDF and Fred the photographer excelled at. The focus though isn't just on the feet and legs. It's on the panties slipping down the legs then off the feet. It's sensual in ways most porn these days can't even touch. Nothing in these scenes seems hurried. Could be two women in a pool, teasing each other with their toes, which leads to the panties sliding down, which leads to rubbing their legs together, touching, kissing, and finally what looks like believable out of control sex.
The solo scenes offer similar as well. You'll have a solo model teasing the camera, rubbing her own legs, rubbing her feet, panties start sliding and she goes into a wild masturbation.
The scenes with guys involved are also very good. Lots of teasing, fairly good chemistry between the guy and girl (also rare these days), there are footjobs, there are cumshots up legs, but it's still sex, just a little more sensual than we're used to seeing on most mainstream sites.
I would even say I would join it by itself without the network for a month. One of my favorite parts about their videos is they don't go overboard with the bit stream of the videos. A 25 minute 1080p video will be around 1.5 GB instead of the 3-4 GB you see on a lot of sites. I know that's a preference, but I really can't see enough difference between a 1080p video with 3,000 bitrate from one with 1080p with 10,000 bitrate, except in the time it takes to download and the space it takes up on my external hard drive.
I do think the pictures have taken a slight backseat to the quality they used to have on here, but from what I understand DDF is no longer the photographer, so it's to be expected.
The navigation on Hot Legs and Feet could be slightly better. We're getting into the area where less is more. There's 15 years of scenes on here. Just something to make it a little easier to find older scenes. I have trouble remembering all the different model names and end up trying to search through 127 pages of scenes. But maybe that's not a complaint? I was once told if I couldn't offer a fix then there's no reason to complain about it. I do believe their navigation is close to as good as you can get on a site like this one. My advice is to use the model list instead of trying to dig through 127 pages.
Last, the network that comes with this site has no less than 6 other sites I've joined in the past for $30 each. This is a really great deal for Euro-lovers especially. The only deductions I took off the score was for repetitiveness and the lack of adding anything new to the scenes. It was somewhat groundbreaking 15 years ago, but now it just looks like really high production quality porn. I've always believed the leg/feet sex sites were the precursors to today's heartcore sites. Definitely worth a join for anyone.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A huge network that produces mostly mainstream porn, but its archives contain some unique content.
- Great TBP/PU price.
- Very high technical quality, including 4K videos and can also use with a Roku if you use Roku.
- Updates can be a little uneven at times, but they seem to average around 2 new scenes (photo and video) each day. I've seen a few days with 3 updates, a few other days with 1, but it generally averages out to 12-14 per week.
- The biggest plus for me is the archived content, especially the "live" videos, will go into in the BL.
- Lots of niches, but in general, most of the content is similar with just a few changes in the storyline.
- Navigation is good for a network of this size. Good can be a misleading word. The categories work good and the model list works even better, but it's all a little cluttered and can be hard to find the tab/category you are looking for unless you stick the model list, which is what I do.
Cons:
- There's an ad that pops up each time you sign in, but it's at least easy to see how to avoid clicking on it. It does make the network a little more confusing since it has scenes that look like the scenes I've seen on the site, but says you need to upgrade. For all future references for webmasters. I'm going to start upgrading to sites that don't ask me to upgrade.
- Download speed. I've seen complaints about this on Naughty America. My speeds aren't terrible, but they are slightly below my average speed. I'm downloading a video right now as a test. It's downloading at 5.1 MB/s. My average (for porn sites) is around 6 MB/s and some sites go as high as 9 MB/s. The slower speed makes it frustrating to download the bigger files.
- This one doesn't bother me, but there's lots of implants and tattoos.
Bottom Line:
The very first time I joined Naughty America was in 2004. I joined because of the site So Cal Coeds. It was one of the first amateur sites I had seen and being from Southern California it just seemed like the perfect site.
Since then, Naughty America has grown into one of the largest, oldest porn networks on the internet. Much like everything else that gets bigger, better, it also develops a familiar feeling you get from the other big networks like Reality Kings, Brazzers, Bang Bros, etc...
A feeling of "I've seen all this before." And the one I feel the most towards these sites, "Are you even trying anymore?"
Don't let that dissuade you. There's a lot of high quality content here. Production values are about average and there's so many models you can't really complain about them since you'll see 5-6 you don't like then see 5-6 you do like.
I'm surprised by the time and money they have put into new technology. They have a whole new Virtual Reality site. Which by the way is no use to me. One of my eyes was damaged when I was a teenager. I can't use VR glasses properly. But it's still there. They also have Roku controls which I have tried and it works as good as any site's Roku channel. They also are doing the 4K videos. But none of those were big draws for me.
Back a few years ago, I had an external hard drive that failed after being knocked off my desk. Most of the content on it was easily replaced, but I had my Naughty America Live series on it. To this day, I would rank that series as high as nearly all series I've seen on any site. It's kind of like having a hidden cam and watching the models. There's a theme. Library, gym are my favorites. The model starts dressed, reading a book, sitting in a school desk, working out, then strips and masturbates. I never understood why they stopped the series, but it was worth a monthly membership just to get all those back into my collection.
Even if those don't interest you there's probably something on the network that will. Like most networks, they're really just a big site that takes each niche and names it like it's a separate site. They have 47 sites by my count and that includes the 7 live sites.
They've been doing the MILF genre as long as any of the networks if not longer. I remember having access to Seduced by a Cougar back 10+ years ago. And in my opinion, they lean more towards the MILF models these days than the teen models. That's not to say there's not teen models, but I would estimate 65-35 on MILFs to Teens. I normally prefer the MILF models and have for years, so that part works better for me.
Besides having 4K, they have had 1080p videos since sometime in 2009. It's worth mentioning here that around mid-2009, they started offering 1080p and 720p on all their videos, but only in Flash format. It's hard to tell when they switched to .mp4s, but it's somewhere in the 2012-2013 range. I never had a problem with any of the formats, but know others have said they felt like it was a hassle. Of course, you can get VLC media player and it plays all of the formats, which is what I do.
They also include a picture set with their videos/scenes. This is one of those better than nothing situations. They include several hundred photos, low-quality, most are 1000 high end. So they're not trying to be the next Met Art, but they do at least offer those in downloadable zips for the picture-lovers.
It's hard to find a lot wrong with the network. The download speeds are a problem if you want the 4K videos. And while the ads are there they're not obnoxious or placed strategically to get you to accidentally click on them. If I found anything I would call a major problem it would be that the site is just getting too big. You could spend a month just browsing it. It's similar to Videobox in that sense. I just downloaded all the live archived videos and found a couple of favorite models and downloaded their sets. I figure if I start digging into all the sites I'll end up frustrated and not download anything.
That's hardly a fault of Naughty America, as much as it's me not having enough time to dig through all the content.
I would recommend it for new members especially since a new member could probably fill up an external hard drive with quality porn for the low price. Return members will still find enough new content or in my case, lost content, to enjoy a month or two subscription. It's just not quite up there with Reality Kings for me, but it's close.
Oh and one last thing, my billing for it was done through Epoch, one of the best billers in the porn world. Easy to cancel.
I had looked this one up and got different results than are listed. I would have guessed something in the "step" niche since I've reviewed 4-5 networks lately that have the stepsister, stepmom niche sites. The results I found had stepmom at the top. Hard to believe, but "cartoon" porn was 2nd.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another first time join for me. A heartcore site with a lot of high quality content.
- Others might not agree on this, but I prefer the pictures on this site to the videos. And the videos aren't bad at all. The pictures are just that good. (Will praise more in-depth in BL).
- Very pretty, natural models.
- Updates aren't daily, but looks like they average 2 videos a week and 3 picture sets. Or at least have since I've been a member. One week was just 2 photo sets and 2 videos, but they could use a little more structure and order to the updates.
- Uses CCBill as biller, been a long time since I joined a site that uses CCbill.
- Good amount of solo sets which I still prefer, but has plenty of boy/girl sets, boy/multiple girls and some girl/girl.
- Some 4k videos for those who want those. Still not really a big deal to me. Videos have 1080p option dating back as far as I have looked.
- Should have started the pros with this. Photo sets start with model(s) clothed!
Cons:
- I really hate this one since otherwise this site is near perfect. The navigation is a pain in the ass. It's not terrible, it works well, but there's one long page of updates. Hopefully you like scrolling. You can get around this by going to the model list, but I don't know most of these models. They have a drop-down box that allows you to filter with like 4K only, photos, videos, so that's why I say it's not terrible, but even after filtering, you're back to scrolling.
- Could use more girl/girl. I could even do without the boy/girl on here.
- The old "that's not really a con" con, would like more photos in the picture sets.
Bottom Line:
For whatever reason I've avoided joining X-Art for years. I think it has to do with my frustration with the heartcore-boom from a few years ago. It was everywhere, even on hardcore networks.
I think it creates a philosophical problem for me. I just can't see something staged ... as love. Not to worry, it's why I also don't watch mushy television shows. I know they're actors and the stories are fictional.
Outside of that, the only real fault I can find on this site is the navigation. I really don't even know what would fix it? Either way, I scanned as far as I could to see when the 1080p videos became available and after using hyperscroll for nearly a minute straight, I made it to 2010. Those had the 1080p option. The problem with this long scrolling screen is it causes a computer to lock up as it loads more scenes. I'm usually working on something else when checking porn sites out so I have to stop whatever I'm doing.
Hard to believe that's a complaint, but my PC is on the higher end. I don't know if that would muck up an older computer or not.
The rest is good. Models, much like Wow Girls, are really pretty younger women. I want to say there's a little more variety here with body size, but it wouldn't be a big difference. These models all look like fit college girls. I can tell because my wife has girl-crushes on college girls and she really likes these models.
One thing I will compliment that probably isn't mentioned much is these girls look more like regular girls than glam models. Which is really great for me. A couple that stand out right now for me are Lily Ivy and Melissa Moore. They both remind me of girls I see over at the local college. Especially in their dressed pictures.
Which is another big plus that's probably not mentioned much. All of the picture sets I've looked at start with the model in clothes. It's usually regular everyday clothes like a tank-top and shorts, some of the multiple people photo sets start in just underwear, but that's even better than starting out nude.
The solo videos are as good as any site's solo videos, believable, passionate masturbation. The girl/girl videos are also believable. The boy/girl videos are okay. It's the same problem with all heartcore sites. Heartcore tries to sell too much realism. I don't like realism in my porn and seem to become cynical towards it. No big deal though, some will really like those boy/girl scenes.
The photo sets could have more pictures in them. Quite a few are under 50 photos. Usually 100 is a good number. It's not really a complaint since I'm saying I would like to see even more. The photo sets can be downloaded in 1000, 2000 and 4000 high end. Download speeds are excellent on both photos and videos. I'm downloading the videos at 7 MB/s, which is above average for me.
There's only so much praise you can give a site. Having CCBill as a biller is even a big plus these days. Very pretty models. High technical quality. Models dressed at the beginning of photo sets. Downloadable photo sets. Fast download speeds. That nearly fulfills my entire mental checklist of what I want from a porn site, but there is the clunky navigation and the similar build/race models to complain a little about. Though neither of those are enough to pull this site down. I consider it a little better than Sex Art and put it well above Wow Girls.
I'll go as far as saying it has made my list of sites to return to. That list is very small these days. Would recommend it to everyone.
Edit: didn't remove any points for a minor annoyance, but wanted to mention it. When I first joined and signed in, it took me to a community page. I don't have much interest in community pages on porn sites. I thought I had joined something besides a porn site.
My biggest fear in life is the day I wake up and am bored with life. Same thing with porn. It has happened before. Even to some extent now, I'm still struggling with boredom with porn. I feel like I'm downloading scenes to save for the day when I start feeling excited about porn again.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My first time as a member to this fairly large, technically impressive site.
- Very pretty models. You might actually get bored with the models because they're all so pretty.
- Technical quality is excellent. Most videos start out with the 540p option, have the 720p option and the 1080p option. Things can get confusing here and I'll go into that in the cons and BL.
- Also a good site for those who like pictures. The pictures are downloadable at 1000 long end, 2000 long end and 4000 long end. Most sets have 75-100 pictures.
- Very good download speeds. I've consistently downloaded at 7.5 MB/s
- Daily updates.
- Decent blend of scenarios, solo, b/g, g/g.
- Very good navigation, clear and easy to use site overall.
- Uses Vendo as their biller, I've used them a few times and haven't had any problems.
- Good passion and believable scenes.
Cons:
- Well, there's one really big con. I feel duped at times. I go to model list and there's a really hot model, so I click on her and there's no content of her. I find another really hot model, click on her and it has one scene then says out from it, "If you're interested in more from this model check out FantasyHD with our special discount. No, no, no. This is a premium cost website. I understand when Reality Kings lets a person join for $10 then advertises their other sites, but not for a $30 site. Then I click on some other videos and it says, "Upgrade to diamond level". What the hell? I was going to upgrade until I saw the price of $68. I'm sure to go on about this more in BL.
- It wouldn't hurt them to add some variety to their models. Maybe a few tattooed models? Maybe a model that has ate a full meal in the last month? No offense is meant, but look at as a warning for those who aren't into just slim/slender models.
Bottom Line:
Edit: Just want to add that I received both Wow Girls and Wow Porn right off the bat. I had forgot this when typing out the pros. Looking at the past comments, I see several members talking about having to wait a month or two before getting access to Wow Porn. It is available now right from the start with Wow Girls, but it too also has the scenes that want you to upgrade to diamond before you can see them.
I've of course heard a lot about this site over the last few years. I will say, there's some really pretty models on here. Some of the prettiest I've seen. And many of them are doing hardcore. This site kind of reminds me of the heyday of 1byday/Twistys/Club Sandy, the mid-2000s boom of glamour models. Except most of these Wow Girls do more than solo scenes.
I'll get the negative out of the way since it really hurt my scoring of this site. Ads are one thing, but to have dozens of models in Wow Girls model list that are being pushed for you to join other sites is even more annoying than ads. There's even some models in the model list that have no content available anywhere on any of their sites or partner sites. Then there's scenes in the updates section that are not available with your "gold" membership and can only be seen if you pay $68 to upgrade to diamond/Shane Diesel. I complain enough about the American networks using tricky advertising to get you to click on them, but making me open a scene only to find out I can't see it, might be even worse. Why not just shade it out and put a diamond on it so I know I have to join diamond to access the scene?
The good news is, the rest of the site is very good. I'm still not really into the whole heartcore-style of porn, but it's not quite as mushy here as on other heartcore sites. The girls make up for it. Very few sites can compare with the quality of models this site has.
There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to which scenes are "diamond" scenes. I've been able to access some of the 4k scenes and 60fps scenes, but others say I have to upgrade. While even worse, it seems like the older scenes are all stashed away somewhere since they too say I have to upgrade to diamond. Meaning, it's obviously not just the high technical quality that defines a "diamond" scene.
The pictures are probably an overlooked strength of this site. All of the picture sets I've looked at have the model starting out clothed and ends up fully nude.
The site's navigation is easy to use. Click a scene, scroll down to the bottom and click your desired format/quality, done. No goofy dropdown boxes or 61 formats.
The most important part of this review, for me, is that this is one of the first sites that has made me really look at the price of the site. I'm not for sure I can justify the $30 for this site. I've reviewed sites recently that had double, even triple the amount of updates, 1080p videos for 1/3 the cost of this site. The quality, production quality, is higher here, but I still don't know if it's enough for the price.
I did not figure the price into my rating, but it does give me reason to wonder if I'll join this site again.
I could see recommending it to anyone that doesn't mind the price. At least for one join. And I at least appreciate them not automatically upgrading me when I clicked on it to see what the price was going to be.
I don't think it's as good as Sex Art and I've just joined X-Art for the first time too, but haven't had time to spend comparing this site to it. I will eventually.
I would recommend this site most for those who like really pretty, glamour, prissy, girly-girls. Back 10 years ago, I probably would have rated this site a 100 just for the overload of prissiness from the models. I've gotten older and probably dumber. I'm just not as picky anymore. And as said above, would compare this site very favorably to Twistys at its highest point. Beyond that though, it's comparable to nearly all the other sites with Art in their names.
Also will say I love the settings used on this site. All the way from the furniture to the distant views behind the action. It's really great.
I know my score is pretty high for all my complaints, but I can only score so low when there's this many pretty/prissy girls in one place. Will be interesting to see if this site starts to offer their upgraded membership cheaper. I would give it a go at $20 upgrade or $50 for the full experience. I took off roughly 10 points for the annoyance factor of the upgrade to diamond/model upsells to other sites and models with no content.
I never grew facial hair beyond just stubble. As I've gotten older, a lot of people kept saying, "You look so young to be your age". I started growing a beard a few years ago, kept letting it grow, kept saying I'm going to trim it or shave it. Think I went about 7-8 months without shaving or trimming it. Up and shaved the whole thing off. Realized I liked the beard after shaving it off. Now I let it grow for 2-3 weeks before trimming it up. Sometimes I'll let it go for a month or two. I never realized how much I like having a beard. My wife loves it, but I think part of her fondness of it is that it makes me look closer to my age since there's some gray in the otherwise jet black hairs. It seems to go good with my bald head. Except for with my uncle, who constantly makes the same joke over and over each time I see him, "Did you get confused and shave your head, but forgot your beard?"
Oh and I picked other. With my strange ethnic background, it will only grow so long, it instead just gets thicker. I even bought a comb for it to keep it looking full, but neat.
Hey PP, couldn't agree more. I've become more and more frustrated with that opening load time as I'm getting deeper into the membership. I do the same thing on the page that finally opens, it's annoying to wait on the thing to load then it makes you click Enter Team Skeet. I think their management has changed, but I'm not for sure. Their old webmaster was a really friendly, helpful guy. These sites are lucky to get one join a year from me these days.
Thank you, I just checked by clicking the upgrade button in the member area. It popped up a screen that says this:
BFFs
$18.00 monthly Unlock Now Punish Teens
$18.00 monthly Unlock Now Teens Love Black Cocks
$18.00 monthly Unlock Now
Family Strokes
$18.00 monthly Unlock Now
Daughter Swap
$18.00 monthly Unlock Now
Sis Loves Me
$18.00 monthly Unlock Now
That's really confusing since each one has its own separate Unlock Now button. I don't know if they charge $18 for each or give you all for $18.
There's also another site that's available that I didn't see during my review called, "Petite Teens 18". It also says $18 monthly and has an Unlock Now button.
If it helps any:
BFFs, Punish Teens, Teens Love Black Cock and Family Strokes all have between 50-60 scenes each.
Sis Loves Me and Daughter Swap have 26 and 17 scenes respectively. The new one Petite Teens 18 isn't even listed in the sites available inside the member area so I would have to think it couldn't have very many scenes. Based on the number of scenes on these upgrade sites, I have to believe they are $18 for all. I couldn't imagine Daughter Swap costing $18 for 17 scenes, but don't hold me to that. Their webmaster used to come by quite often. Maybe he'll see this and clear it up.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite networks. Was even a favorite way back in 2010 when I originally reviewed their site "Innocent High" which was the flagship site of a then growing network called Team Skeet.
- Network has grown quite a bit over the years. Back in my old review there were 9 sites back then, now there are 20+.
- Good quality videos and photosets for each scene.
- You get one new scene per day. Each has a video and photoset.
- HD videos started as far back as 2008, which wasn't that far into the network's existence.
- Very good download speeds, I'm downloading at 7.5 MB/s, which is pretty close to my max and it's needed if you want those 1080p files since some are as big as 3-4 GB each.
- Billed through Epoch, which made me very happy considering the last few sites I've joined used billers I hadn't heard of.
- One of the best, if not best networks for those who like variety in their models, race, size, boob size, butt size, etc...
Cons:
- I don't know if the network is still ran by the same people as it was in 2010, but they've worked some frustrating parts into the site either way. From the Team Skeet homepage you can select "Sites" tab which spares you the frustration of sifting through the updates with ads and locked scenes. What's a locked scene? It's a site within the Team Skeet network that's not included with the Team Skeet network. Huh? Lost 5 points there. I will further this in the BL.
- Like a lot of the bigger networks, they try a new niche, only to stop it just 20-30 scenes in.
- Has lost some of its original feel it had back in 2010.
Bottom Line:
Team Skeet's original charm for me was Innocent High and Oye Loca. I always liked the innocent schoolgirl look and Innocent High had all of their models wearing their own schoolgirl outfit. Oye Loca is a mostly South American shot Latina site. My name alone says I like the Latina girls (but not exclusively Latina) and Oye Loca was one of the very few sites that had an authentic feel to their scenes, the models also were mostly amateur Latina girls.
Then it grew as a network and Innocent High and Oye Loca became just a part of the network. Innocent High used to update weekly, then it went to one update every two weeks, now it's starting to look like it's going to be one update per month. Oye Loca used to also update once a week, now it's once a month. I talked to their webmaster way back years ago here on PU and he talked about how hard it was to find amateur Latina models for Oye Loca, so I can understand, but those were my two favorite sites on this network.
That's not to say it's going downhill. Overall, the network has added some new very good sites like Exxxtra Small, Teen Curves, She's New and Teens Love Money, so all is not lost.
My one big con/complaint is the way they list their network sites. At the top of the homepage there's a tab for "Sites". Since nothing is made clear, I'm going to help anyone out who is interested in this since I think it's unfair for a network to do this. All the sites below are not only listed in the Team Skeet "sites" tab, but also in the Team Skeet dropdown menu.
There are six sites listed as Team Skeet sites that you cannot access without upgrading your account. These sites are: Punish Teens, BFFs, Teens Love Black Cocks, Family Strokes, Daughter Swap and Sis Loves Me.
This leaves you with 20 sites that are at least still active and included with your membership. You can see how the network has grown, but can also see why it can be a bit frustrating when looking at their site list since adding all those up comes up to 33 sites, but you only have access to 27 and only 20 are updating. It's understandable with some of the bigger, older networks, but this network hasn't been around as long as those others.
On top of that is the less original feel the network once had. As you can see the "step-sibling", "family", "sister" niches have slipped in.
Still, in all fairness, it's a very good network for the cost. You do have to do mouse Olympics to avoid some of the ads, but they are very good about getting believable "teen" models going on 24. And again, I don't know if it's the same guys who used to run it, but they were friendly, helpful, fun guys towards members.
Even with my complaints, I would still recommend it over nearly every network except maybe Reality Kings. And if they're not owned by Reality Kings, they're at least affiliated with them since I saw longtime Reality King male talent J-Mac in a Team Skeet scene.
They also have a few sites that I think offer some good potential if they'll keep them running like CFNM Teens and She's New. CFNM Teens hasn't updated since late May, so it's possible it might already be dead, it only has 28 scenes on it, but this is a niche that continues to be overlooked. Take it from the old psychologist, these CFNM sites are great for couples to watch together, but no one seems to be able to keep them going. Reality Kings has a good one, but it stopped updating too. She's New is a site with amateur models trying to make it in porn. I'm sure they'll slip a few already models by me since I don't keep up with new models like I used to, but it seems pretty authentic. That will always be a hugely-popular niche.
So, outside of the no longer updating sites and the sites you have to unlock, there's really not much to complain about. The videos are very good as are the picture sets, which are downloadable in zips. The vast majority of scenes show girls having fun and enjoying themselves, which to me is also a big strength of Reality Kings. I was both surprised and happy with those download speeds. I will say the network itself is slow when loading, but everything else moves along good.
Would recommend it to everyone except those who like older models (I'm one of those), but don't let that sway you away. There's plenty of curvy young women on this site, which is usually the reason for preferring older models and there's plenty of entertainment and niches covered to fill most porn fans hard drives with hundreds of gigs of high quality porn. If not for the ads and "upgrade" button, this network would have received a 97, but it's a 92 instead.
When I lived in Southern California it was almost always warm. Where I live now, we have four very distinct seasons. Yesterday it was 94 and the realfeel (there's a name for a VR porn site!) temperature was 103. Winters are pretty bad, we had 41 straight days below freezing. It's pretty bad when you move from California to a climate where 40 in February is warm. But the spring and fall weather here is really good. Upper 60s - lower 70s, upper 40s - lower 50s at night. That's when I'm feeling my best and enjoying everything a little more than these sticky, hot summers and the frigid winters.
Doesn't bother me.
They're adults.
We need to stop telling adults what they can and can't do.
It's porn. It's filmed with very sexually-active people. There's a risk. It's not my risk.
It's like all the talk around football and mixed martial arts causing CTE. So, we're going to make more protective football helmets and protect MMA fighters. Why? Big hits in football, sell. Big hits in MMA, sell. Every football player and mixed martial artist knows the danger. As does every porn star.
I always like to share an old saying from my uncle or grandpa. My grandpa used to have me cut his lawn. I was maybe 8 years old when I first did it. He told me about holes in the yard. He said, "Just mow over them. If you stick your hand down in one and get bit, don't come crying to me." I was 8 and understood that danger. I trust an 18 year old should be able to as well.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A huge network with enough content to make three or four networks, won't be surprised if they eventually try that.
- Quality of new videos are very high 1080p with high bitrates to match, they've had the 1080p option for 6-7 years, but the older ones have lower bitrates.
- Two new scenes per day, each includes video with multiple format options and a very large photoset/screenshot downloadable zip as well (600-800 photos).
- Navigation continues to improve on all of these large networks. It looks like they're using similar software to run their sites on. Considering the size of this network and amount of different niches, their navigation is bordering on being excellent.
- Fairly impressive number of their sites are still active and updating, which is pretty rare for these big networks in 2016. More detail in BL.
- I'm sure it's subjective, but I like their models as a whole. There are lots of tattoos, lots of implants and lots of big asses.
Cons:
- Download speed isn't that good. Mainly because it's inconsistent. I'm not for sure if they cap members DL speeds, but can say most of mine download at 3.2 MB/s here on Brazzers. I've reviewed other sites where I was getting close to 9 MB/s. That's way too big of a difference.
- Their billing as usual is frustrating. First problem is it has a dropdown box when you're signing up. It recognizes the discounted price you are to receive. The dropdown box has "yes, sign me up to brazzersnetwork for $24.95" or "no, I don't want this special offer". What the hell? Paying full price is beside the "yes" answer? Getting a discount is passing up a special offer? Then to cancel you can either call them, chat with them or email them. There's no CCBill-type cancel option of doing it from their biller's site. You have to just jump through a hoop and hope the person you talk to, chat with, reads your email, cancels your account. They did send a cancel confirmation.
Bottom Line:
It had been maybe 5 years since I last joined Brazzers. I have more than my share of bad stories with Brazzers, but they have the site "Moms in Control". It's a site with women 35-45 that catch their niece, whatever fake relation they come up with, having sex and the older woman joins in. I really like this niche and it was my main reason for joining.
I can confirm quite a bit of the older content has been removed. One of my all-time favorite exhibitionist sites was Asses In Public. It's still here, but is down to 16 scenes. I have upwards of 100 scenes from it (from 2010) on my external hard drive.
That download speed issue is a problem too. I actually have a scene downloading right now and it's an older scene. I've always assumed the more a scene is being downloaded the slower the speed, but this is a scene from four years ago and I'm only getting 3.2 MB/s on it just like I get on the newest scenes. I was on Reality Kings a few days ago and consistently was hitting 8 MB/s.
Good luck with the billing company, ProBiller, I've not had any problems with them, but I've always talked about hating a hassle. That's what you get with ProBiller. How freaking hard is it to make an automated cancel page? And that dropdown part from the cons is just tricky. I've had issues with Brazzers doing similar before. I remember they used to have the annoying cancel page where you clicked cancel and it would say, "Do you want to cancel your membership?" You would click yes, it would then say, "Are you sure you don't want to stay on as a member?" Tricky wording. Looking for people to make mistakes by clicking the wrong answer.
Onto the content, this is where they excel. Moms in Control is one of the very best of its niche. And it already has almost 60 scenes. They then go through their typical Big Tits sites, Big Tits at Work, Big Tits at School, etc... They also have Big Tits in Sports, which is a poorly-represented (across the internet) niche that I like and it has over 250 scenes.
Their update schedule is acceptable with two new scenes per day (across the network, not on each site). Maybe more impressive is the fact that they have so many active sites on their network. As of June 28, 2016:
I'm counting 33 sites. Of those 33 sites, 18 have updated in the last two weeks and a couple others are borderline if they're still updating. That's pretty impressive.
One of the things worth mentioning is that this is very much a porn star network. You will occasionally find a newer or lesser known model on here, but the vast majority are the best known models. To me, that's both a plus and a minus. A lot of this content is similar to what you can find on DVD sites like Videobox, so it makes collecting certain favorite stars frustrating since you might already have a scene that is similar to one you get here on Brazzers, even though Brazzers has 100% exclusively shot scenes.
These are the sites I ended up liking the most:
Moms in Control would rate it around 90 by itself.
Big Tits in Sports would rate it around 82 by itself.
Big Butts like it Big would rate it around 85.
Day with A Pornstar would rate in the mid-80s for a least some originality.
Hot and Mean would rate in the mid-80s, but this site has changed quite a bit over time.
One I thought I would like, but don't is ZZ Series. This is Brazzers attempt at creating something like a DVD with a full theme carrying over for multiple scenes, including a parody of Game of Thrones.
So, there's plenty there to keep me (or you) busy for several months, especially if they're only going to let me download at 3 MB/s.
I'll add something a little different here. I too hate their ads and their embedded videos, those chat girl ads are maybe the worst. Here's what I do:
When you login and are on the homepage, go to the top where it says "Explore", click that and you'll be in a less cluttered, less ad-filled area. By doing this it removes the embedded video at the top and it removes the chat girls completely. Once into this part, the only ads I'm seeing are at the bottom of the page which isn't too bad.
Much like my previous reviews of Brazzers, I think they have very good content, very high quality content, even great navigation, but they could make everything easier, especially canceling. When I have trouble canceling a site that delays me returning more than anything else and it's the biggest reason I chose a 90 score. I don't know for sure how much higher the score would be without the canceling hassle and/or the tricky wording when joining, but I can say it would be a network I would join more than once every 4-5 years.
There's been a few that I've wondered about, but it was mostly because they only were doing girl-girl scenes. I posted a comment on the forum about the "no take dick six" back years ago. I don't remember all six, but I know Eve Angel, Sophie Moone, Sandra Shine and Anetta Keys were four of them. From what I've seen now, Anetta is married to a man and has children. Sandra's few boy-girl scenes were with the guy she was dating, not for sure about Sophie, but just saw something a few weeks ago about Eve Angel being pregnant.
I think it's a different time in porn these days. Back when those four were entering porn (in Europe), they had to get broken into the business by one of the big Euro producers (DDF, Viv Thomas, Pierre Woodman etc...) And nearly all of them required a boy-girl scene. Making it big enough to say they were only doing girl-girl scenes seems to have been the big goal for the Euro models (early to mid 2000s).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
