I ran into a wall a few years ago. All porn seemed the same. I wasn't finding near as many models that I preferred. Overall, it was frustrating since I realized my favorite part about porn was using some imagination. That's not to say I fully support "no pink", but I can and do enjoy things like see-through underwear, clothing especially panty ... malfunctions.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of very varied genres.
- You're sure to find some genre you like, handjobs, hardcore, trannies, midgets, hairy women, older women, older men with young women, solo girls, wet and messy (WAM).
- Technical quality is questionable, but the downloads work good and the navigation is good, so I'm listing it as a pro.
- A lot of the picture sets come in downloadable zips.
- The problems others have had with this network's billing seem to be fixed. I canceled with no problems.
- Quite a bit of the content is exclusive, but they do use their own content on more than one site. For example, Lori Anderson's My Sex Life has a handjob section in it. The network has a handjob site that is mostly the Lori Anderson handjob videos.
- $9.95 TBP/PU price
Cons:
- Ads, there's an ad at the top of every page that offers a free one day subscription to another site. If I remember the small print it then rebills at $39.99 after one day. You have to avoid clicking it. Then when you go to leave the site and get your mouse pointer up to the url box of your browser, another ad pops up for Jim Slip's site. It's a bit annoying.
- The site design isn't that bad, it has a hub page that has all available sites which can be accessed with one click, but every site works differently and there's no uniformity between the sites.
- I'll go over the mix of genres this network has in it, but I'm really surprised by the extreme differences.
- It's hard to say on the exclusive part. Most or all of it looks exclusive to me, but there's fudging. The site "Teen Photos" comes off as a purely amateur site, then right there on the first page is the forever cute Addison Rose. The advertising of this site in particular comes off as self shot.
Bottom Line:
This is one of my lowest scores I've given in a long time. For those that don't know, I very rarely go below a 70. I try to keep my scoring range in 71-100. My apologies on that part since I can't figure out the difference between a 50 and a 70. By giving this network a 75, I'm saying it's not that good, but if you're interested in the content they have it could be worth a one month join especially with the great TBP/PU price of $9.95.
I'll start with my single biggest complaint. I can't tell you how I dislike sites/networks that don't put dates on their content. It's for multiple reasons. One, if you date your content, it makes it easier to tell when you started putting higher quality videos on the network. It shows if you're still updating. It gives us an idea if the content is just old content being used as archival fill.
That's my feeling with this network. I really don't remember all these sites being in the same network. I've looked at Tampa Swingers before, but don't remember it being in a network this large. Same with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life site. It looks like these are sites that have all stopped updating and were put together as a large collection.
There's nothing wrong with that. There are good things here. The network works well as long as you dodge the ads. I'm betting those ads are the kind that sign you up just from clicking on them. One sits roughly 1 inch above the "see all updates" button.
I'm going to start with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life. Lori has been around for a long time. Her cam schedule on her site still has her listed as active. Freeones has her listed as active since 2004. Most of the content on here looks to be from 2004-2008, basing it on the picture quality and video quality. The videos are 480p. The pictures are 1280 long end and a little blurry. She comments on one of them and says something about her pussy in picture #24 being the cleanest pussy ever. You can't even see it because of blur. She also doubles as one of those models that shouldn't write their own blogs/comments. She explains in one of the sets that she washes her pussy twice a day with a shower massager and never goes to bed without washing it again. Seriously, this is porn, turn me on, don't tell me about your hygiene regimen.
From looking at the other sites, I've not seen a video over 480p. I have seen a few that do have dates on their updates, but can tell you some are wrong. On Teen Girl Photos, a site that's not half-bad, they have picture sets of Addison Rose listed as 2012 that are from 2007-2008, how do I know? I've been collecting her content since 2007 and have sets that look identical to the ones listed as 2012 from 2007. This site is advertised similarly to those "My GF" sites, "Teen Amateur Self-Shot" sites, but like those sites, very little of the advertised content can even be found. Still, it's not terrible especially if you collect any of those models. I think most of that content appeared on Twistys, Teen Dreams, back years ago.
Then there's the unusual, but appreciated mix of genres of sites. If they had a CFNM site I would say they have all genres covered. So there can be a positive there. You might find a few gems you haven't seen before. That's another positive, the network works really well. You're taken to a home page hub that lists each of the sites included in your membership. You can get to each one by clicking them and you don't have to sign in again.
As soon as I start saying positives, a negative comes up, for some reason, after about 30 minutes on the network, it stops recognizing me as a member and gives an unauthorized message when I click on a set/scene. I hit refresh, it recognizes me as a member and pops its tricky ad up in the middle of the page again. Get that off there.
Whether to recommend this network is where I'm most torn. I won't be joining it again and will only keep a small folder of content from it. But if one of those genres or more than one is something you enjoy, you might like it. Just be warned about those silly ads, the fact that you have to refresh it every 20 minutes or so and that I'm going to take a guess and say there's no new content on this network and hasn't been since 2013 or so. There's a handful of scenes that say 2015, but I don't see it in the technical quality of those. So, look at the content and decide if those varied genres would be enough. I think it's the only thing this network really has going for it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's like a porn scene mixed with a robotics convention mixed with a home improvement show.
- If you're skeptical of women models having orgasms in porn you should join this site. It gets messy.
- Very basic navigation as with most of the Kink sites. It works well, but they could definitely use a more in-depth search.
- Good download speeds, which are needed since some of the HD scenes get into the 1.5 GB range.
- Kind of surprising, but you'll find a lot of the top-tier models on this site.
- This is a hit or miss depending on the girl, but you actually get quite a bit of dirty talk from some of the models. Others fall into the "Oh shit, oh shit, oh shit" annoying talk.
- Kind of reminds me of some of the old Sybian sites. You see a model that seems to hold back in most of her scenes, then she gets on this site, gets a 8 inch dildo stuffed in her by a mechanical contraption and she goes wild. That's a major plus this site offers that very few do.
Cons:
- Kink sites rarely do much wrong and this one falls into that group of not doing much wrong.
- Kink sites can become very repetitive and once again, this site falls into that group.
- 720p is the highest video option available and I do think this is a Kink standard. I've been a member of three of their sites over the last month and none offered 1080p.
- The action can become too hectic at times on this site.
Bottom Line:
You'll never look at your personal drill the same. I discovered this site years and years ago. It was the only Kink site I would join since I thought most of their stuff was too hardcore for my taste.
I'll get those cons out of the way first.
Repetitiveness. It's to be expected with a site like this. I'll admit, I enjoyed this site quite a bit more back when I first reviewed here on PU way back in May 2008. And it's mostly because the scenes today aren't really any different than they were back then.
Too hectic. Dancing Bear. Party Hardcore. Those two sites are too hectic because there's too many people involved and too many switching cameras. This site is too hectic because the machines work so good. You've got machines pounding the woman at X amount of RPMs, she's screaming, stuff is squirting out, dildos are popping out and slamming into their thighs. Some of the girls, a very young Jynx Maze comes to mind, almost seem to have figured the machines out and move in harmony with them. Other girls on here are letting the machines control them.
But hey, it's better than those solo sites where the girl grinds her hips after 10 minutes of masturbation and claims she had an orgasm.
I do think this content is fairly unique even in 2016. There are models who get completely lost in what the machines are doing them. Those are some of the best scenes.
Technically, Kink will always be strong with 720p clear and smooth videos. They do offer smaller resolution too. Pictures are gone, which I also think is a new standard for Kink sites. The scenes start with the model dressed and talking about different things about themselves, their lives, this can last 7-8 minutes in some of the videos. Once that's done there's usually some kind of basic masturbation with a regular dildo or Wand, then the clothes come completely off and the machines are cranked up.
There's no way I could say this for sure as this is a very big site, but it seems like they would leave some of the models in clothes or even just hose, fishnets, during the scene to add a different feel, but I've not seen any that do. Which is where this number comes in:
Over 1,100 completely exclusive videos. Most of the videos are in the 20-30 minute range and I'm guessing that's just because the girls can't take anymore. You'll see a lot of genuine reactions, orgasms, squirting in these videos. You even get the fun of seeing some models blush, giggle and cover their faces when the scene is over and really just act completely different from what they act like in a normal boy/girl or solo scene. That's why you join this site. Much like other Kink sites there's that one thing most of their sites do and it's worth a join to see it.
I should mention that not every scene is solo. Some of the scenes have more than one girl which, in my opinion, only adds to the hectic style of these videos.
It's another departure from normal porn and it's recommended. I join several of their sites each year, once a year and I can say I've been disappointed with any of them.
I've talked about this one before. I'm a little weird. It turns me on to think of my wife with other men. Has something to do with my past and passive-aggressive, self-abuse behavior.
I think calling is much better. We don't have too much trouble with the zombie texting. There can be as many as seven people living in our house. We don't allow texting (unless emergency) in any of our rooms except bedrooms. My 78 year old uncle came to visit a few months ago and my two nephews sat there texting the whole time. If not for my wife, their cellphones would have been destroyed.
It's hard to believe, but there really are some good uses for cellphones. I even believe texting was originally intended to be used in work environments that made calling/talking/hearing too hard (Construction comes to mind). As those first cellphones with texting ability were always the rugged, hard body, good grip phones.
I use texting in a side project I work on. Since I gave up on Psychology (probably more like on people lol), I fell back on my past engineering experience. We live in an urban city, but are right beside the Appalachian Mountains. Along with two other engineers, we have developed electronically-controlled harnesses for bridges. The bridges in the Appalachians are often 50+ years old, terrible erosion if over a creek, lake or even worse the Nolichucky River. These bridges are used by farmers, fresh produce trucks and the random lost trucker. The local cities/counties won't fund the repair or replacement of these bridges. Once we have a harness in place all we have to do is go to the bridge, prior to an expected rain and measure the erosion, foundation shifting, we then text the measurements back to our office. It makes the necessary changes in real-time, by tightening, loosening, tilting, the harness. Calling would be just as good, but there's no phone reception back in the mountains. However, the iPhone can send texts as iMessages to any other iPhone or i product (Pod, Pad, Mac), these get delivered about 95% of the time even with no reception. That's what people should be using them for.
But mine are usually my two nephews. Goes like this.
Them: Need ride
Me: Just call me
If I haven't replied or read their text after 5 minutes I get this one.
Them: u busy?
I've never been one for having the newest phone, but my wife used to work for one of the big three carriers and even though she no longer is working there they do allow former employees to stay on a discounted plan. They email me every two years to tell me I'm able to upgrade to a new phone model and I've used it the last few times. I tried and tried to avoid the iPhone, but finally got one when the 5 came out. I'm now using a standard not (S) iPhone 6. I doubt I'll upgrade it. I've gotten used to it and it works well. My family got me into the iPhone since they all use them and I got tired of getting texts that said, "Did you get my text (imessage)? I can't see if you read it or not". The 6 has impressed me. I like the size (4.7 not plus). I can still use it with one hand and everyone I text now knows if I've read their texts or not.
I'll probably never come all the way around to phone technology. I always ask them, "You do realize you can call me and ask me the question instead of waiting for me to read the text and reply?"
So I picked other since I don't pay for the upgrade. If I had to pay then no. I would probably still be trying to use my Kyocera Soho flip-phone from over a decade ago lol.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the biggest, best, longest-running teen sites on the internet.
- Going to put this in because it's rare these days, very responsive webmaster who helps with any and everything you ask.
- Very good quality videos and photo sets.
- TBP/PU price is good, especially if you've never been a member.
- Four updates per day, two videos and two picture sets. Can't beat that these days.
- Over 1,700 models. Will mention there's lots of eventual hardcore models who shot softer sets here on Nubiles in the beginning of their careers.
- They seem to be tinkering with the idea of becoming a network, though I actually rate this site Nubiles.net better than the network and it includes this site.
- Search engine on site is comprehensive and I believe it's very accurate based on my years of collecting Nubiles videos.
- Download speeds are very good (7.2 MB/sec), I can reach a little over 8 MB/sec, but many sites won't even reach 5 MB/sec.
- Navigation works well (See bottom line)
Cons:
- I know I never would have believed this, but seeing pretty young women getting naked then masturbating or having sex with another girl or even guy can become repetitive.
- You'll run into some naming/alias issues with some of the Euro models, but that's pretty common.
I reached on those two. Crickets are now out.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying this is one of the sites that once made me say, "I think they have a hot teen factory in their studio." I don't know how they do it, but it's as if Nubiles just churns out hot teens everyday. I have a lot of single male friends! Where do they get these young women?
I've had a long-running complaint with nearly every site that has Euro models from the mid-2000s forward. I'm obsessive about my filing of model content. Like every other site featuring these models, there's some odd names/aliases. I will say Nubiles has gotten a lot better about this one.
My other complaint is one I'm sure they've heard before. Sometimes the scenes lack passion or believable interest from the model. The scenes being in similar locations and doing similar actions, only leads to more problems with it becoming repetitive, but ...
In their defense, many of these models are shooting their first porn scenes or are in the very early stages of their career. It's a trade-off I think we have to accept as porn users. The girls show genuine shyness. To some that might make the scenes even hotter, but to some it's going to make the scene not as hot as we thought it would be. It's a fine-line and I've chose not to take off points for it this time.
What you do get is a staggering collection of young women, teasing, naked, masturbating. There's some girl/girl scenes and boy/girl scenes, but I mostly like the solo scenes. It's hard for me to even comprehend "over 1700 models". Most of you know I'm one of those numbers people. That 1,700 models number means if you wanted to you could see a new model everyday for 4.5 years. I ran out of characters in the pros, but I'll add it here, all this content is exclusive too.
I reviewed the Nubiles Porn network a month or so ago and didn't like it as good as Nubiles.net, even though Nubiles.net is included with it. I just didn't like the slight navigational differences. The network has a new, cleaner navigational interface so it makes Nubiles.net feel outdated. I've always had trouble deciding how important one aspect of porn sites is in comparison to a different aspect.
I feel comfortable after reviewing over 250 sites to say the same thing I said way back in 2008, "The models and content makes a site". That's why I scored the network lower. It has good content, good models, but I see no use for it. I don't want to turn this into a business rant, but my general way of thinking was, "Why not spend that money on upgrading on Nubiles.net?" That's why I'm not a webmaster. I'm also in no position to question Nubiles webmaster. He's one of the best and has been for years. I think he moved up into a class by himself when Shap sold Twistys.
The bonus sites included with Nubiles.net are the very sites that comprise the Nubiles Porn network. They are scenes with a common theme. Most of which were obviously created to break the formulaic style of Nubiles.net. I can appreciate it and like all of the content.
Nubiles.net has four updates per day. It's nearly unheard of in 2016. Their picture sets are excellent in quality, always start with the model dressed, strip down, to spreading their legs fully nude. The videos are your standard young woman gets naked, teases a little, then masturbates. Formulaic? Sure. But it works. I'm starting to think our complaining about the scenes being too similar might turn into a "don't fix what isn't broke" situation. I'm not saying the network will cause Nubiles to fail, but I've seen it happen with other top-tier sites that try the network route.
Despite preferring the network's navigation, I don't think Nubiles is at all bad. The search engine alone is worth a few visits just to see how many combinations you can come up with. There are 15 attributes (age, boob size) you can choose from. There are 15 outfits (thong, skirt) to choose from. There are 9 actions (Sybian, lesbian) to choose from and finally 3 environments to choose from. There's even a button to select "girls only" to remove any scenes with males in them. There's an alphabetical model list. An option to pick what the most sexual action the model does (topless to sex).
So, why am I still holding out on a perfect 100 rating? Personal preferences. I do like curvy models. There's not many here and I don't think curvy is Nubiles audience so it's understandable. If you don't mind that you'll be very happy with this site. It's a little like Met-Art, but more sexual. It's a little like Twistys, but has more character and less glam. And it's a lot like Nubiles from 10 years ago. Even when I felt I had valid complaints in previous reviews, it's been in my top sites. And that's because of the content and quality of models. They're consistently very good as long as you're able to see around the shyness of some of the models and able to realize you're watching a young woman get naked on camera for one of the very first times in her career.
I wanted to pick "absolutely not" based on what little experience I have with this situation, but I picked other since I have watched some much older porn in my life. I'm sure some of those women have passed away.
I think for me it's more of a time situation. The best example I can give is Haley Paige, who was one of my favorites from the mid-2000s, then I read one day where she had passed away at the age of 25. Ever since then, I've not been able to even download scenes with her in them.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that I always seem to return to. Thought it would be a good choice to get my 500th experience point here on PU.
- It's a site that can't really be explained by just a simple title like "Public Disgrace".
- Around 360 full scenes, videos and photos for all the scenes.
- You'll see scenarios used in the scenes that you've probably thought about and some that you'll start thinking about.
- Site works well, but it's also pretty basic, scroll, download, scroll, download. Using the navigational buttons isn't much help.
- Like all other Kink sites it has very high production values. These people aren't just shoving out some scene that looks like the last 100 updates.
- Great download speeds. I'm averaging 8 MB/s, most sites I download from only reach 6 MB/s and 6 MB/s is my average.
- One new scene per week.
- Some very long scenes if you like that.
- Lots of outdoors and public scenes.
Cons:
- Believe it or not, I wanted to give it a 100, something I've never done. Thought it would go good with reaching 500 experience points. Something I never thought I was possible. But there's no zip downloads for the pictures and that's been a big no-no for me for years. Took 4 points off for it.
- Took another point off for the disgrace part. I've always struggled with the disgracing of men or women. But only took 1 point off since the site is named Public Disgrace. I knew what I was getting into.
Bottom Line:
I don't think any site works for me in the ways Public Disgrace does. I'll have a little fun with this part. A big part of my enjoyment of porn has to do with the fantasy aspect of it. This fantasy could be me being one of the random guys standing around watching the scene being filmed in an adult video store (do those even exist anymore?) to my self-abusive side imagining my wife (girlfriends in the past) being the woman in the scene. Neither one is particular healthy, but I do need this type of change from mainstream porn scenes.
I always turn to the Kink sites to break my boredom with mainstream porn. The good part with Public Disgrace is it only updates once a week so if you have the hard drive space, you can catch up with every past scene then just join sporadically to pick up the new updates.
What you're getting here is the closest thing I know of to public sex. I've tried the ones going for the more realistic belief (spy cams, voyeur cams, security cams), but I'm able to convince myself on most of Public Disgrace's scenes being authentic. I find it easier to convince myself than trying to watch those green shaded cam videos. So there's the funny part about me and my interest in this site. It lets my fantasies feel realistic.
I guess if a person wanted to nitpick they could say there's no 1080p videos and if there are, I've not found them. The newest updates highest option available is 720p. Bitrates are very high at 5,000+ so they stretch pretty cleanly to a 1080p screen/monitor.
And I will always nitpick about zip downloads for picture sets. I feel strongly about this on a site that is shot mostly in public. Videos work good, but photos let you see not only the action, but also the people in the background, their expressions, reactions, things you most likely miss in videos.
The disgrace part isn't as bad as a I remembered it being. I still see a lot of it as immature. Kind of makes you think you're watching Bang Bros, but instead of goofy/annoying college frat boy talk from the cameraman and crew, you get people writing on the woman's body. Could live without claiming to disgrace a woman by having her have sex in front of a crowd. That part to me is also an insult to the members of the site since I'm supposed to assume the model is disgraced.
As for public sex and nudity, they could do just that and I'd be happy. I feel like porn these days has become too vanilla and predictable. There's nothing predictable about a girl suddenly bending over in a bar and spreading her butt for anal sex in front of 200 people.
A strong suit of Kink's is that they know the models who are capable of doing this type of porn and it shows in the scenes. Just like in regular life, we all have different fetishes and dislikes. I think the majority of Kink's models love doing these types of unique scenes. I'm guessing most have an exhibitionist side that feels holed up by 127 scenes of them having bed or couch porn sex. You get some really great, genuine scenes here thanks to that.
There's also some added mystery and intrigue to the scenes. For example: A 22 year old college girl being tied up outside for sex with four men. Only comes an older man and she starts giving him a blowjob while the other four men take turns with her. Is it because she's getting paid to give the blowjob or is it that she got that horny over the four men taking turns with her? You don't get that with the vast majority of porn sites.
I've said it many times before. There's something to be said for being different and original. I'm not for sure if new porn fans would really be into these scenes. Sometimes there's 10-15 minutes of build-up before there's any sex. It kind of reminds me of going from reading a magazine to reading a Hemingway novel. It's definitely not for everyone just like Hemingway isn't for everyone.
I was surprised by the near my max download speeds and it was on all scenes I downloaded. It's needed as some of the scenes go over 2 GB.
Everything else was as expected. Lots of pretty (many tattoos) girls doing things that go beyond a girl doing just regular porn. That's a major turn-on for me and no site does it better. On the downside, there are times I won't even look at Public Disgrace for 3-4 days. Either way, it's a great site that sometimes will push things a little further than I think they should. I would recommend it to anyone who's looking for a site that is nearly guaranteed to be different than any porn you are watching right now. And just remember, let your fantasies require realism. They might be opposites, but if you can do that with this site you'll probably like it as much as I do.
Had the same thing happen that standard had happen. Mainly because I can't fit it all into 3,000 characters ... big surprise lol.
I currently do marketing work (it's a side hustle from home). My ideas are different than most, but I have a high success rate as well.
To put it in few words:
I don't like the social media side just because that requires members of PU to be open to having PU in their friends/followers. Considering that PU's most loyal members are mostly middle-aged guys who have never heard of or completely avoid (or use them to stay in contact with family) Twitter and Facebook, it will be hard to promote PU on those platforms. On the other hand, there's other platforms, anonymous bloggers, erotica writers who use a pseudonym, that could open some advertising avenues outside the standard ones.
I'll start going way too deep into the character count if I go any further, but if I could be of help I'd be glad to do so for no charge. If nothing else I might could throw some ideas out there that haven't been thought about.
Like Badandy, I have 3 hours of push mowing per week, but I don't mind it. I also put in close to an hour of weedeating per week. My wife loves planting flowers, bushes, even trees, so I have to get the weedeater out to trim around those. Good news for me is I bought a riding mower just this past week and will use it for the first time this week. I use the yardwork time to listen to music I've not had time to listen to.
Unlike Pat, I hate washing dishes. When we moved into the house we are currently living in, I had been used to having a dishwasher. Our current house has built 75 years ago and none of the owners ever decided to put a dishwasher in. There's plenty of space for it, but it would require ripping antique, handmade cabinets out.
Then like Pat, I really don't mind any of the others.
I have questioned myself on buying an old house since I've been working on it now for nearly two years (putting new plumbing in, new windows and painting fully), but I don't know, it's kind of taught me about the word "home". I grew up in an older house and always said if I ever get out of the old house I would never live in anything but a condo. Did the condo thing for 10+ years then got frustrated with the whole Homeowners Association bullshit. My wife says she knew she had to marry me when I said to the Homeowners Association President, "What the hell do you mean I can't plant bushes near the curb? It's my damn yard."
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network of DVD sites/studios. Including several that used to be standalone sites like Doghouse Digital and Sweet Sinner.
- A little over 1,000 DVDs as of 5/9/2016.
- Good mixture of genres.
- Very good search engine for a DVD site (always worry about this one on a DVD site, will explain).
- Good TBP/PU price
- Good blend of newer (date of production) DVDs/scenes with older DVDs/scenes, will explain below.
- Very high DL speed for me.
- Only one ad in the members area and it's at the bottom of the page. Probably should give them two pros for that one.
- 11 scenes added in the last week, notice, this is a DVD/studio site, but they do not upload full DVDs as updates, they do one scene at a time.
Cons:
- A DVD site that has a good, working, easy to use search engine always makes me think it's not showing me all of the possible results. It's kind of like having an anti-virus software that never shows any viruses in its searches. That's probably an unfair con, but it's worth mentioning.
- Despite having a nice variation of genres, the content here becomes repetitive.
- Updates are similar to the search engine. There's a newer update of a scene with "Sandy Fantasy" in it. Sandy Fantasy originally known as Zsanett Egerhazi later became known as Sandy from Club Sandy looks to be early to mid 20s in it. She's 37 or 38.
Bottom Line:
I joined Sweet Sinner years ago and really enjoyed their content. I also had been a member of Doghouse Digital years ago. Mile High Media is now the network name for the network those two sites and two others comprise. The other sites, Reality Junkies and Sweetheart Video are both well known as DVD studios that are focused on reality porn and lesbian porn, respectively.
First of all, it's a good deal. If you like DVD sites like Videobox, Videosz, it's a very good alternative to them. Even though there's not a claim to the content being exclusive, I really haven't seen much (if any) of the content here on DVD sites.
Which is probably the biggest con also. It's another DVD site. If you're burnt out on DVD sites then this one likely won't help matters for you. I think it's the argument against exclusivity now. While I've not seen these scenes on other sites, I have seen scenes with the same model doing the same genre, in the same outfit ... but with a different man or backdrop. And so goes the case against DVD sites and the studios that shoot porn that is exactly like the porn another studio shoots.
As example, while thinking I had seen one of Mile High Media's scenes named Couples Seeking Teens, it was actually Couples Seducing Teens that I had seen on another site. Seeing that this is a very narrow genre (one woman has to look really young), you end up with the same models as other sites/studios use in this type of scene.
Having said that, I don't regret joining this network. I haven't been a member on the other DVD sites for several months so the monotony was broken.
I said this about another DVD site, but don't remember which, Mile High Media's studios have tried being risky. They're marketing to a mostly straight male audience, but have tried tranny and even m/m/f with bisexual male. There's so many sites that never take risks, it's at least nice to see someone trying to at least try something different.
I'm counting roughly 1,020 DVDs as of today. Roughly 4,800 scenes. Right at 3,700 of those scenes are available in 1080p quality which is really unheard of for a DVD site. It earned them a 5 point bonus.
I could be completely wrong on this, but I could have sworn that Sweet Sinner had pictures for download with each scene, but whether they did or not, they don't have them now.
Maybe my joining this site and the reasons for it will help others. I like collecting DVD porn. This network has a lot of DVDs, especially in HD, that I don't have. I think the matter of exclusivity is that some of the scenes on the DVDs have been on once exclusive sites. I'm making an assumption based on the Sandy Fantasy scene, which is how she was known years ago on the DDF sites. DDF also had lesbian scenes of women that involved lots of kissing. This one particular scene is from a DVD titled "Girls Kissing Girls".
However, being a collector, I also will say in their defense that I believe the vast majority of the content is exclusive.
I would recommend it to DVD collectors and those looking for hard to find scenes.
I picked other just because all these can be really bad.
Merc77's comment above made me think of an outdoor scene that I think I've used in showing what a professional model Eve Angel is/was. There's also a second too that I've talked to Advent (from ATK) about here on the forum.
Eve Angel outside by a pool. Masturbating in a lounge chair. Fly or bee keeps flying around. She shoos it away a few times. Then right as she's starting to orgasm, the bee or fly lands right on her thigh. Without missing a stroke with her dildo, she suddenly slaps the bug and finishes her orgasm. She does giggle a little about it.
Eve Angel masturbating in a bathroom in a building that's being remodeled. You can hear the construction crew yelling out orders to each other. Suddenly, a ladder crashes down outside in the hallway. The cameraman yells, "I'm filming a damn scene!" Eve? Still masturbating, maybe even faster and doesn't miss a beat.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network centered mostly around the great nubiles.net site.
- Fairly good mixture of solo, b/g, g/g, threesomes.
- Download speeds are very good and more importantly, are consistent from day to day.
- Network itself has excellent navigation, but there is a con on this one too.
- Still considers pictures to be an important part of porn and that's a big plus in my book.
- Newer picture sets can compare in technical quality to Met-Art, ALS, etc...
- There's a lot of porn on this network, but it's going to be mentioned again in the cons.
- Some interesting niches like the DriverXXX site and I really like the TeenBallerinasFucked scenes.
- I think it's a fair price through TPB/PU. The content is all exclusive.
- Update schedule is good overall, but the network and the 8 sites included, only update a couple times a week. But it's very important to note that Nubiles.net comes with this network and it updates multiple times per day.
Cons:
- Damn networks. No offense is meant, but for whatever reason, Nubiles.net has become the feeder for Nubiles Network. I'll explain it in the bottom line.
- Navigation is really good on the 8 network sites. For whatever reason (I'll probably say that a lot), nubiles.net isn't listed within the network even though it is included. This means you have to sign in each time you want to access it and the username/password is one of those randomly generated ones.
- I don't know what percentage, but I've downloaded scenes from network sites that are from Nubiles.net. They're just more focused videos, removing the 3-5 minutes strip, build-up and jumping to the sex instead. I've already got many of these scenes and I have a fast forward button.
Bottom Line:
I felt really strange about reviewing this network because I'm not scoring it higher than I will be scoring Nubiles.net. That's a problem since Nubiles.net comes with this network. Then I noticed that TBP scored Nubiles higher so I don't feel as strange about it now.
Nubiles.net needs very little introduction. It's one of the best teen porn sites ever. We can all find faults with it at times, but if you're looking for cute, teen girls doing porn, it's probably the most consistent site you'll find. This network it is now a part of is a good idea. My biggest complaint with Nubiles has always been based around the scenes being too similar. This network allows them to add more niches and themes.
First problem, much like other networks, there are sites here that have just stopped updating. It makes me feel like these networks are just chasing the newest trend in porn. I remember casting sites being very popular a little while back and there's one on this network, but it hasn't updated since December 2015. The interesting and intriguing DriverXXX site is also on this network, but it hasn't updated since December 2015. I live near a big tourist area in the Appalachian Mountains. We go up there every few months and it reminds me of porn networks. They'll be building the newest, hottest trend themed park. We'll go back and they'll be building something else, completely giving up and forgetting the once hottest trend.
Just like those two sites no longer updating, they're now updating stepsiblingscaught and teacherfucksteens, two of the more popular genres in porn these days.
Can't complain about the technical quality. Scenes from 2008 and on have 720p option and 1080p option since 2012. I've said before their videos are some of the clearest, smoothest, I've seen, but you should know the 1080p newer ones can be very large. I've seen as high as close to 3 GB for one scene. Their pictures are real standouts. They have downloads in 3 different sizes with the biggest size being in the 5600 long end range.
So, why score Nubiles.net higher than Nubiles.net's network? Less hassle. When I sign in to Nubiles-Porn which is a hub for the network, there's 8 sites listed at the top. Each of those sites can be accessed with a click. No need to login again either. There's a problem. Nubiles.net isn't up there in the toolbar. You can find it over in a dropdown box and you have to sign back in to access it. I got over that. After downloading many new Nubiles.net scenes, I decided to download some of the network site scenes. My apologies to those who had posted a comment about this problem. I join Nubiles without looking at comments. This is my 23rd time as a member in the last 8 years.
So I see a scene on the network's hub page that looks good. Download it. Start watching it. I've seen it before. It's a scene from Nubiles.net with the stripping removed, straight to the sex. Now see, I got over the signing back in part and Nubiles.net not being listed in the toolbar, but edited Nubiles.net scenes? That throws a monkeywrench into my organizing of scenes.
I'll stop what's turning into a negative rant. The site/network is still very good, but I found myself going to the Nubiles.net site and not fooling with the network. I don't understand why those scenes can't just be put on Nubiles.net. I enjoyed the DriverXXX scenes and really like the TeenBallerinasFucked scenes. I don't see the difference in them and anything I would normally see on Nubiles.
It's still highly recommended and if I get the time I'll post a separate review about Nubiles.net, which I will rate in the 90s.
I'm surprised I missed this one when it was the daily poll. I have a whole list of broken bones. Some were funny, some not so much.
Broke my right hand (all fingers) and wrist when I was 12, fell out of a tree and landed on my hand on asphalt. Broke my right wrist two weeks ago. Was carrying a 40 bottle case of bottled water. The plastic on it started to tear, I tried to support it against my truck, but didn't realize my hand was going to get trapped between the swinging 50 pound box of water and the steel of my truck door. Cracked the hell out of it.
Broke my left wrist/thumb four times as a teenager playing baseball. Had to do with my batting stance.
Broke my left ankle 1 time as a college football player. Broke my right ankle 3 times, femur 2 times, all while playing football.
Broke right and left arms one time each playing football.
Then the funny one and I know it's not a bone, but they come with funny stories. I've broken my nose 13 times in my life. My nose is permanently crooked. One of the funny stories is really funnier for me right now than ever as my oldest cousin, who was there when it happened, passed away last week and I was just telling his daughter about it a few days ago.
First is another funny nose break one. I had a brand new pair of Air Jordans, probably 1992, my family was on vacation. I wanted to take a quick swim in the hotel pool. Kicked my shoes off, jumped in. Looked back and there were wasps flying around my beloved shoes. I jumped out of the pool, grabbed the shoes, a bee was flying in my face. Instinct told me to hit it with the shoe. Common sense didn't tell me my nose was in the way. Completely crushed my own nose with a shoe. The worst/funny part? The damn bee still stung me. There was blood all around the pool.
The one with my cousin. I have a broad range of ages when it comes to my cousins. The oldest ones are actually as old as my mom. We were on vacation again. There was this really cute girl working the putt-putt counter. We all made a deal that whoever won the putt-putt game could get first shot at asking her out. I needed to make a four foot putt to win. I missed. It was still okay. If I made the next shot it would be a tie, which would lead to a one hole shootout between us. I missed the now 2 foot putt. The ball rimmed around the hole. I picked the ball up and threw it at the hole. Didn't realize there was concrete under the green turf. Ball flies back up, hits my nose and blood is everywhere. My oldest cousin, who won, starts laughing and gloating. I threw my putter club into a pond beside the course. He laughed even harder. So I shoved him in the pond too. All the while, blood was pouring down my shirt.
And like the ER doctor told me on my 13th broken nose, "When you've broke your nose 13 times you can't help but laugh about it." Fun question for me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the biggest networks on the internet. As of 4/18/2016, there are 45 sites included in membership.
- One of the best networks for those who like a racially diverse mix of models.
- Nearly every possible genre is covered to some extent.
- 720p videos or higher have been available since late 2009.
- Averages two updates per day across the network. Pictures and screencaps are included with most videos and are downloadable in zips.
- Can't believe I'm putting this as a pro, but they have a "lock" icon on the scenes that are not included in standard membership.
- This is purely subjective, but I still find their humor to be a plus. Some of the scenes are so corny (in story) that I can't imagine a great actor acting out the parts.
- They're really good at what they do. Which can become formulaic, but at least they bring in top talent.
- Some fairly unique and "fun" sites like Money Talks and CFNM Secret.
Cons:
- Download limits, though I disagree with them, they are at least now clear about what the limits are and are at least good about unlocking your account 24 hours after you hit the limit for the day. It's also consistent now, unlike how it used to be.
- Ads, ads and more ads. They've got ads mixed in with the scenes. Ads in the margin. Ads in the header. And the forced ad when you login. They used to annoy me, but if it keeps the price low it eventually becomes not as bad.
- 45 sites is a lot. Quite a few of those don't update and haven't updated in years. Not for sure why they don't create an archive and just stick all those in it instead of keeping the individual sites active with no updates. Will cover those in Bottom Line.
- If cameraman talking, guys being silly bothers you, you will have some problems with this network.
Bottom Line:
I've never been able to be overly-critical of Reality Kings. The amount of exclusive content. The varied genres, races of models, just always seemed more thorough than the other big networks. I still feel that way.
I know there's lots of reviews of Reality Kings and quite a bit of negativity towards them, but I've not had any problems with their network. The download limit is frustrating, but I've learned to workaround it now that they've made it consistent and simple to understand. I do want to say there's two different listings of the download limits. One says 50 movie scenes per day. The other says 10 GB a day. Over the last few weeks, I've hit the download limit twice and both times it was after downloading 50 full scenes, both of those times were well over 10 GB, so I'm going with the 50 full scenes explanation as it's on their site. That's a lot of porn. You could easily download 300 GB+ in a month at that rate.
The biggest draw for me has always been the diverse models. There's slim, medium, very curvy, nearly every race and I prefer that variety over one standard type of model. Like most, I sometimes get annoyed by the guys talking, but other times it's kind of funny. It reminds me a lot of the guys I grew up with. You even get some ongoing humor from the regular male talent like J-Mac and his line about being in college. He's been using that line with the college girls for about 10 years now.
The technical aspects of the site are very good, but like a lot of sites, they started counting "HD" when it was 720p, so it's almost impossible to see when they started doing 1080p, but all of the newest scenes have 1080p and 720p started roughly in October 2009. I've always complained about networks that count their sites so they can advertise "we have X amount of sites". Reality Kings does that too; I'm going to list the active ones.
So, that's 20 active sites with 25 inactive sites. There's a few, as noted above, that haven't updated in at least a month, but look to use roughly a monthly release schedule so there could be more updates coming with those.
I actually think 20 active sites would be a better way to advertise since there are so many networks these days with less than 10 active sites, but 45 sounds better to new members.
As a notice to others, they, like Bang Bros, did buy some popular amateur sites that went broke and have all the content from those included in the network and are counting those in their sites. Some of those sites have very good content on them, but haven't updated since the mid-2000s. Which also means you take a big hit in technical quality on those sites.
I do like the newer sites they've added over the last few years. The Moms Bang Teens site has a lot of Brandi Love content and if you're not familiar with her she's one of the better porn models these days. Great energy and believable. The high score is also justified, in my mind, by them having multiple sites that are in the top 2-3 of their genre. Those are:
I haven't had enough time to tell if their newest one, RK Prime, is going to be a success or not. From the handful of scenes they have up so far it looks like a typical gonzo/location site with some voyeurism thrown in. The scenes I've watched from it are good, but I don't know if it will do as good as Moms Bang Teens. And that is what I've always preferred about RK over the other networks. They seem to be a little ahead of the curve and try to do unique things with their content. I've always wondered when someone would try a site with a voyeur watching a couple have sex and RK Prime goes into that. It's far from an original idea, but you don't see it very often these days. I remember Vivid having an entire DVD series "The Watcher" that was extremely popular in the late 90s/early 2000s, but very few if any sites/studios have tried it since.
It has its faults, but if you pay attention, they've made it near impossible to click a scene you don't have access to and the download limits aren't near as bad as they used to be. I've said it before and still believe it, if the content wasn't good, we wouldn't be bothered by the download limits. To me, it's still the best of the American-based networks.
Meant to post this. It's the pizza place I was talking about above. Has some pictures of their pizza.
The people pictured bought it from the original owner, named "Greg". It's been open since the 1960s, same location, no renovating, same menu, nowhere to eat inside either. Visitors complained that they didn't have tables or chairs, so they stuck some outdoor patio furniture in the parking lot lol. It's very classic, all-natural/fresh ingredients, very Italian and as the pictures show it's a bit greasy. They've won the local polls for best pizza for 20 straight years and were featured on the Pizza King's website as a top 10 in the country.
I don't read a whole lot anymore. Having been back to college over the last four years, at my age, kind of pushed the books away from me. My wife bought me a Kindle Paperwhite awhile back. If I do read anything, I prefer reading it on the Paperwhite. It's really nice on the eyes. I do still read the local newspaper occasionally.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of, if not the, top lesbian sites on the internet.
- Over 750 models, 1,558 videos, every video has accompanying photo set/screencaps that are downloadable.
- Roughly 3 updates a week.
- Older content has tons of scenes of the top-tier Euro models from the 2005-08 time period. Great for collectors of those models.
- Was the first site I saw with "tribbing" and there's quite a bit of it, it's one of my favorite parts of the lesbian porn. Also lots of kissing.
- A little confusion on how long they've had 1080p, it looks like they've started remastering the older videos, randomly, so there's some 1080p, then a newer one won't be 1080p, but it looks like they are all 1080p starting in 2006. Will go into that in BL.
- Good download speeds and navigation but will also go into navigation problem that might not be a problem for some.
- TBP/PU price is very good.
- Photo quality is good, but not great.
- A rare one these days, no ads in the member area!
Cons:
- There was several of these sites that were using the same "naming" system for Euro models and Sapphic Erotica still uses it. What this means is if you knew a model by a certain name there's a chance she won't be named the same here. The most obvious one for me that shows how confusing it can be is Eve Angel. I would think she's one of the best known Euro models. Her name on here is ... Daphne. I've seen her name as Eve, Eva, Evie, but Daphne is only used on this site and a few others also managed by the company who manages Sapphic Erotica.
- Like any porn that focuses on one genre, it can become boring.
- Some of the old videos that say they are HD 1080p, look like someone has taken an old video and upscaled it improperly as they're not as clear as the newer 1080p videos. Also had several videos to "fail" during download.
Bottom Line:
A bit of a mixed bag. I really do believe Sapphic does lesbian porn as good as anyone. At least for me and I'm of course, a male, who knows very little about real lesbian sex. So, lets put it this way, they do lesbian porn in a way that is directed at men. Not to say women and lesbians won't like it, but it's very similar to Viv Thomas' way of shooting lesbian porn. There's lots of kissing, focusing on the womens bodies, the action including tribbing is very good. I have a friend who is a lesbian that tells me tribbing is nothing more than the creation of a dirty man's fantasy and I tell her that's fine. It works.
I didn't score Sapphic as high as I thought I would. I've had numerous errors in downloads of older videos. I used to join this site 3-4 times a year and have a large back collection of thier content. When I saw the older videos showing up as HD, I downloaded them since I already have them, but mine are lower quality. As I said in cons, I am only assuming they've done some kind of upscaling to those source videos and it shows. While the videos are 1080p, they look stretched and blurry. Those are also the ones I'm getting the most errors on when downloading.
With that complaint out of the way, the newer content is still very good, the videos, dating back to 2007 or so are crystal clear 1080p. Anything before then is hit or miss.
I don't know if they've changed the way they do pictures, but a lot of the pictures are just screencaps from the videos. I know some of their old sets came with a video/photo set that wasn't spot-on identical.
The alias problem has always been a big problem for me since I am/was a collector of Euro models. Some of the models don't have aliases like Peaches, but most of the other well-known ones do. I've had long discussions/arguments with webmasters about this for over 10 years. They tell me they use the name the model on her release paper. Other people with knowledge of the behind the scenes work in porn have chimed in and said that's not true. That the sites originally did it to make a model "seem exclusive" to their site or to claim some kind of exclusivity to the model being on their site.
Sounds like a lot wrong with the site, but really it's not. The site works well, downloading is easy, clean interface and the action really is probably as close as we're going to get to real lesbian sex. It's very passionate, very believable and on top of that, nearly every model is very pretty/attractive.
I would recommend it for anyone into lesbian porn, at least as a one-time join, just to get the older videos which were some of the best porn I've ever seen.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A mostly non-nude, but still a provocative website.
- The price is excellent at $7.99/month through Porn Users or $27.99/year.
- High quality photography, technical quality is 1920 long end on the pictures and they are zipped for downloading.
- Updates roughly 4 times a week, it has been every other day since I joined.
- A concept lost in today's porn world ... women in sexy clothes in sexy poses.
- Models are attractive. I don't follow as much mainstream porn these days so I'm not for sure the percentage of just regular girls/porn models wanting to do something softer, but most look like girls you see everyday.
- Some great public flashing too.
Cons:
- Well, it isn't a con for me, but could be for some ... there's not much nudity.
- I'm always for bigger pictures. I consider the 1920 high end to be about the average quality these days.
- There's not a lot of videos if you're a video lover.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying my cons were simply based on a porn fan joining a porn site only to find out there's not many videos or nudity on this site.
A few months before this review, I posted on the Porn Users forum about how I would like to see a website of girls in normal clothes, doing normal activities with some sexual poses thrown in. I had no idea this site existed until I saw lk2fireone's review of it. I had several long-term memberships that were expiring so I waited until then to give Zishy a try.
It's important to mention that my favorite genre(s) of porn is voyeur/exhibitionism. Even when my favorite genre was solo girls, it was mostly based on me liking the feeling of me watching the model masturbate without her knowing it. The mental part of porn is a big part of my enjoyment of porn. I grew up in Southern California. Seeing girls nude wasn't that big of a deal since we could go down to San Diego and watch the college girls in their tiny bikinis. Being a former football player led me to many chances to see athletic girls working out in the now popular yoga pants, tight shorts, so this type of site is right up my alley.
I'll always struggle with anything that comes off as artsy and some of the content here does at times, but that struggle is just because I like the women to look as natural as possible.
Overall, this site really could score 100. It does everything it says it does and a little more as there is some nudity, it just isn't blatant nudity. Good timing, maybe a slight tug at the panties and you get some "accidental" nudity. There's also something rare in some sets. Especially the girls in the workout shorts. You get a little bit of a wet spot on their shorts. Which to me is as arousing as a fully nude, legs spread open model.
And that's why it could score a 100. I believe there's content on here that is completely unique to this site. I don't mean in terms of the content being exclusive (it is), but what I mean is, it's capable of arousing you in ways no other sites are doing. That counts for something in today's cookie-cutter porn industry.
The updates have been consistent every other day since I joined and there's not been one I've skipped over. The photo sets are arranged well as well. Meaning, there's not 12 different pictures that look exactly the same except for one slight movement. The non-nude aspect helps here since the models are usually getting nude way too fast on most sites, but here the fully nude never happens so it's a good balance.
One of my favorites is the Natalie Austin Dress Test. I was a little familiar with her work on FTV before seeing the Dress Test set here on Zishy. It's a set of Natalie wearing a skin tight off white dress with no panties, lighting, shadows, angles all come into play. Also the Carol Jasabe sets are some of my favorite photos I have. She really is one of the prettiest models I've seen in years. Which is another thing that I think makes this site very good. The models are more focused on being pretty, seductive and teasy instead of in your face slutty. Time and place for everything is what I was taught. Seeing that there's not many sites that focus on the pretty, seductive, teasy, it gives Zishy another unique trait.
The site reminds me a little of FTV, especially in the photo sets from FTV. Hopefully that's not taken as a bad thing. I was just talking about how FTV could get a 100 in my review of their site. The only things holding Zishy back from a 100 are technical aspects of their site.
- Bigger pictures
- More videos
Which is me saying the "negative" part of the site is that I want more of the content. That's hardly a negative.
I wouldn't recommend it for everyone. Actually, I would, but I know some wouldn't like the very little nudity part, however, if you know that's what you're getting or not getting (in this case), I really would recommend it to anyone who can get beyond the "very little nudity" part.
I even found a little humor in my membership to Zishy. One of my biggest frustrations in porn is when a model's scene or photo set starts completely nude. I really think I can say if I had my choice between starting the scene fully nude with legs spread by the fifth picture or teasing nudity, teasing legs spread with good hand placement, I would take the teasing set. Hopefully this site will stick around for awhile. I'm going to go for the year membership once my one month is up.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that sells itself as being different from the normal, mainstream porn site ... and for the most part it succeeds.
- Daily updates, right at 2,302 videos in HD. If you accept 1280x720 as HD.
- Amateur content, some girl/girl, including some with 3+ girls and some boy/girl. Mostly solo and that's their strength.
- I think the price is fair for unique, exclusive content.
- Would think women who are into watching other women masturbating would be a big market here.
- There's no cameraman asking a million stupid questions...
Cons:
- Continuing from pros is the first con: Things are mostly artsy and tame here. I don't doubt the authenticity of the masturbation we see on this site, but I do wish the girls were more into the masturbation. (Further in BL)
- There's no pictures. If there are pictures I can't find them.
- I'm mostly positive on this site, but the navigation is terrible. I was last a member on here in 2007 (review in my history here). I honestly don't think they've changed anything about the navigation since then.
Bottom Line:
You would think my score might be lower than it is since there's some pretty big cons, but the quality of the content outweighs the downfalls.
This is a fairly straightforward website that promotes enjoyment for their performers/submitter and their audience alike. It's a good take on porn in today's cookie-cutter porn world, but that navigation is really bad. I would go as far as saying that I took off 10 points for the navigation.
The good parts: The girls seem like normal, average girls. Some are playful, some are even silly and many are shy. I like the dark-style of videos since it gives the viewer a little of a voyeur feel like you're peeping in on the masturbation. There's a fairly broad selection of model body types and ages. There are the occasional girl/girl (or even more than 2 girls) scenes and a few boy/girl scenes that sometimes just includes the guy giving the girl oral.
As with any site like this one, there will be models that aren't generally looked at as attractive, but I personally haven't seen any that I would call ugly.
Video quality is good and has been for a long time. They've been making HD videos long enough to have nearly 2,500 HD videos. Another mention that there are no photos. I really wouldn't want photos of the masturbation, but a few (maybe 5-10) in clothes would be nice.
Then there's the navigation:
Going to the home page opens up a scrolling page with the most recent 10 videos. Below those 10 are numbers, 370 (as of 3/15/2016) to be exact. If you're on the home page you are on page 1. You then click on page 2 and there's 10 more videos and the 369 other pages below them. Click on page 3 and you're getting 10 more videos with the numbers below them.
I have to keep a running tab on what page I was last on.
I will give them credit for at least renaming their scenes to whatever name they gave it on the website so you at least can look to see if you've downloaded a scene already.
Over in the left margin there's a group of categories, which I have no clue what they mean. Lucrabations is one. I didn't misspell that. It's how they have it spelled. Sure, I can click on it and find out what type of scene a Lucrabation is, but why should I have to do that?
It gets worse. If you go to the search function you have these options:
Categories (Home Made, Up Close, Etc)
Attribute (Solo, Friends, HD, Full HD)
Display Mode
Date
To show why it frustrates me:
I searched for "all categories, Full HD, Anytime"
0 results.
Which is understandable since they don't have any Full 1080p videos, but why even put the option in there? I already don't know what the categories stand for since they're mostly non-descriptive. Here those are just in case you're curious:
Studio, Home Made, Up Close, Fantasy and Adventures, Lucrabations, Loose Ends.
Fantasy and Adventures seems to be based around location, some are outside, some are in front of an open window, some are in the shower, etc...
With that being said, whose fantasy and adventures are we talking about?
Despite my complaints, I believe they do exactly what they say do. It's a site with a lot of amateur girls masturbating. They do the close-up camera on the face of the model at times, then between the legs, then between the boobs, it's different. I just wish they would make the site a little easier to use or I should say less time-consuming since you have to click through page after page to decide on what to download.
A tip I've been using to make the navigation a little more tolerable is to go into the search, mark all the boxes then enter a from date and a to date. Use a date that is easy to remember and make it a year period. This makes the scroll, click task a little less frustrating and makes it easier to use. I would still say it's the top in its genre. And would recommend it to those who like amateur solo and girl/girl videos, but have no interest in pictures.
I don't need one. My wife uses her iPhone as an alarm. She sets the alarm to go off in 8 minute intervals. By the third one I'm up and cussing Apple for putting a nuclear strike air raid siren as an alarm tone.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Met-Art network, which means the quality is very high as are production values.
- Wanders away from the usual Met models, there's a fairly high percentage of at least medium build models and some very curvy ones. Count that one twice.
- Daily updates, but there doesn't seem to be any set pattern to the updates. Picture set can be an update. Video can be, but they don't follow a strict photo/video/photo style schedule. Will further in BL.
- Good download speeds which also seems to be true of the other Met-Art Network sites.
- There's some kinky thrown in which is pretty rare on this network. Light bondage/spanking.
- PU price is good and worth a monthly join.
- Large site overall: 825 models, 1,690 photo sets, 608 videos.
- Easy to use navigation, though they could add some options in the advanced search filters.
Cons:
- I'm starting to be annoyed by their ads over on the right of the screen. They have 10 ads that look similar to the updates for what I'm thinking are chat models. It breaks up the cleanness of the site's layout.
- They do a good job overall of creating scenes that are "erotic", but much like heartcore porn, the models are responsible for being believable. That can be hit or miss on here.
- Would like to see more videos. Especially videos of the photo sets, not meaning BTS, but instead I want to see the models in action.
- Should have put this on the other Met-Art Network site reviews. What need is there for a 20 second Met-Art Films logo at the beginning of every scene?
Bottom Line:
This site is one of the more unique sites on Met-Art's Network. There's no boy/girl scenes, but there are lesbian scenes and solo. Nothing here really makes you think of Met-Art except the high quality. They have models who are curvy and models who look like they turned 18 quite a few years ago, not days ago. I definitely prefer the models here over any of the other models on their network.
You also get some kinky scenes. Light bondage and girls spanking girls are the most common. I don't think "anal" falls into kinky anymore, but it is common to see anal masturbation on here. So you do get a little more than you are used to with a Met-Art site, but it's a welcome change for me.
My first and biggest problem with the site is the search feature. All of the sites on this network have the same or similar navigation and it's really simple to use. The thing is with a site like The Life Erotic you have many different scenarios in the scenes since they do go into kinkier content than the other network sites. The advanced search doesn't allow you to search for specific actions. Instead, you are left using the user tags. Which as most porn users know can be a pain. For example: "more of her please" is a tag. And my favorites: "perfect pussy", "beautiful pussy" and "wet pussy". What the hell's the difference? Anyway, you get my point. They should add another box to the advanced search.
You can't complain about the technical quality. Pictures are in the 5500 long end range and are downloadable in zips. Videos have the 1080p option. All 608 also have the 1080p option so you're not going to have to settle for lower quality even with their oldest content.
You might complain a little about the artsy-side of the site. I normally would including the dreaded hot candle wax dripping on the body of the model, but they sell it well. It fits with the scenes it's used in. Today was a good day to review this site since my favorite model (Rebeka) on this site is today's update and she's in a lace bodysuit which is also a favorite. If you're only into videos you might complain after a month's membership. I broke the total number down in the pros and here's the breakdown for February 2016:
29 photo sets, 12 videos. I'm not that bothered by the number as much as I would like to see an accompanying video of the photo sets. Like today's update of Rebeka, it's a photo set. She has 6 photo sets on the site, but 0 videos. On the other hand, it's probably unfair to complain about a site that updates 41 times in 29 days.
The lesbian scenes are very good. Though they also sometimes get a little artsy. One of their recent scenes shows an example of their writing/production quality. A model named Nasty S ties up Solana, spanks her a little, teases her entire body, then walks out of the scene. Leaving Solana turned on and having to masturbate. It might not sound like much, but it's a little different than what most sites do with masturbation scenes.
I would make a comparison of this site to a French site with Art in its name except there's no boy/girl scenes on The Life Erotic. I think the best part of this site is the content is enjoyable. You don't feel like you've already seen the scene before watching it since they throw the twists and turns in. It works in keeping the content unique. It will go on my steadily dwindling "revisit site" list once my membership runs out.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
