If I were to go back and reconsider my review of this site, my score would be even lower. I considered my 75 a fair score based on the photo sets I had seen. As I got deeper into the site the photo sets became shorter and not as good. I also was very frustrated with their method of splitting their videos up into parts and not doing it for any particular reason other than raising their video count numbers. A site would normally face major negative criticism for that. One of the members that reviewed it high also reviewed FTV Girls low and one of the cons they listed on FTV Girls was videos being split, yet they didn't count it as a con against Ersties.
Which is my point of Ersties splitting their videos for no particular reason. FTV Girls split their videos up as does In the Crack, to change locations, actions, outfits, Ersties split videos are just split to raise video count numbers. The newest review of it says in the bottom line, "They have interviews for each video- at the start, sometimes the end-" It wasn't that way when I was a member. They had full entire videos that were interviews. If you notice in that newest review besides saying the interviews are at the beginning or end of scenes, one of the cons they list is, "The number of videos is totaled including the interviews."
Which means the interviews are NOT at the beginning or end of scenes but are in fact separate videos also used to up their video counts. It's hard to believe someone that liked the site well enough to score it a 90 would contradict themselves in the same review by saying they are counted in the total then later saying they are at the beginning or end of scenes. If any of them or their site rep would like to disagree with what I've said they are welcome to. They don't realize all these positive reviews are drumming up attention. At least 2 established PU reviewers have told me they currently have 3 month accounts to the site.
This is one of those situations where I wish the angry webmaster showed up and offered a refund! I think after this past week with it, I would probably lower the score to a 70. I was very positive and up about the photos. Most look to be self-shot which I like but a lot of the sets only have 8-12 photos in them. It's hard to view all the photos in a set too. They have a strange "rose" icon you can give to a photo so it has to not only load the photos but also the number of roses it has received. It looks like they were going for more fluff than substance.
The sad part is after another week with it, I'm starting to think I shouldn't have gave the extra 5 points. I spent a lot of time going through a model list of models I had never heard of and realized most weren't worth the time of downloading.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Interesting and unique site with real amateurs.
- Good mixture of body types from the female models, you also get a good blend of looks, they look like girls and women next door.
- Epoch through Paypal was the biller on mine.
- Cute look to the site, colors are easy on the eyes but see cons.
- Large amount of content for an amateur site but see cons.
- Some very good solo scenes.
- Most of it is believable as people having sex not just performing for the camera.
- Good download speeds (75-80% of my max)
Cons:
- Pricing is strange, there is a $15 option if you join for 3 months and pay $45 total, otherwise it's $35 for 1 month.
- The navigation should have been focused on more than the visual appeal. I will explain in BL.
- This is a con of all amateur sites, some of the women are not attractive to me.
- This will also be in the bottom line, their numbers include interview videos that introduce you to those in the videos. Those will then have a part 2 with the sex in them. I would say it about any site that does that, it pads those video numbers to split them up.
Bottom Line:
I was first introduced to Ersties by my girlfriend back in December 2018. She was very shy about porn. She is a female-positive blogger. She showed me Ersties and said, "This is nice porn". She only got away with that because of her cute accent. I read a lot of the very positive reviews and thought I would try it.
First things first, there is no $15 option unless you join for 3 months and pay $45. It is $35 a month. The site has a nice layout and color scheme. It kind of reminds me of a coloring book. Pretty, soft colors and little people doodles. You also can make your own cartoon avatar. Don't join it for that, you can search Google and do it for free.
I'm going to start with they have some really good solo scenes. The models are all over the place in looks. They have excellent video quality. You can download from 160p up to 1080p on all of the videos. There are some very attractive models. I really like the photos and they can be downloaded in zips. This is where my odd sides shows. Most of the pictures are tease and with some clothes on. I've been this way for a long time. I like seeing women in clothes in everyday situations. I would go as far as saying these are some of my favorite photo sets.
If they just had a solo site with these solo videos and photos, I would say this is a very good site.
That's where everything goes all to hell. Things that should have annoyed me with even the solo videos but had not, started annoying me. I picked two scenes out to show my biggest problem with this site.
I will start with Nina. Very pretty model, her pictures are really good. In the videos we have Nina part 1, it is 10 minutes of Nina talking. Then there is Nina 2 and it is just 2 minutes of Nina showing her tattoo. In Nina 3 she talks some more and takes her clothes off. In Nina 4 she finally masturbates. These stand out for a reason. Videos 1-3 have a total running time of about 22 minutes. Why are those split up? Many years ago, sites like Brazzers and Ox Pass (Bang Bros) split scenes up to get higher video count numbers. I said it was bullshit then and I will say it now.
The next scene is Sofia and Tay in Deflowered. I thought Tay was going to pop Sofia's cherry. He is the virgin. Kind of. Sort of. If it doesn't count that in his 14 minute interview he tells that he attends sex parties with men. And has much sexual experience. Besides that, this scene has Interview with Sofia, Interview with Tay, Sofia and Tay in action 1, Sofia and Tay in action 2, Post sex interview with Sofia and Tay. Five videos for 1 scene.
This problem gets worse. The navigation gives you 131 pages of 10 scenes each and the interviews are included in those. There is a model list but I personally did not know any of these models by name. The only sorting you can do in updates and models is most recent and alphabetical. They have this other tab called "Video search". There are maybe 40 tags. If the tags are accurate there is far more solo content on here than lesbian and boy/girl. I have seen this site advertised as "couples porn". According to their tags they have 59 boy/girl scenes, keeping in mind, most of those will have 1-3 action scenes. So, 20-30 boy/girl scenes. They have 535 tagged as solo. They have 296 tagged as pussy licking. I'm guessing the other 500 are interviews. I'm not exaggerating.
There are 131 pages x 10 per page, that's roughly 1,310 videos and those I listed the tags for only make up about 800. If the interviews were more interesting maybe I could see some of those being of use. We all are tough on sites that have too many interviews. I am going to just share the beginning of one of the interviews:
"What is your name, where are from and how old are you? What do you like about Berlin?" The one model answered that with, "I feel freedom in Berlin, like I have never felt before." Just stop.
It's like porn sites don't realize the problem isn't the person answering the questions. It's the robotic, repetitive questions that are the problems. Now I'm interested in what else they asked. You are welcome for the laugh you get from this. I skipped forward in the interview and the next question was, "What did you do before this?" The one said, "I want to get into the circus school." The other said, "I have tried different things, as well a lot with animals." Those are from the subtitles. I'm not touching it.
Like I said, it has good solo content and I will try to download as many of the photo sets as possible. Those interviews are not moving porn forward. ATK had interviews like these 15 years ago. The boy/girl scenes are not good. The lesbian scenes are okay and that is about it. The navigation really needs work. One of their pinned scenes is a woman with 4 men. The interview lasts 17 minutes. The sex of 4 men taking turns with her lasts 22 minutes.
The photos, video quality and solo content saves this site. I squeaked it 5 more points up to a 75.
I had glanced at it the other day, and was wondering the same thing. I have some Bikini Riot content, not for sure where I got it from, and it is a site that comes with this one. Just from the previews, it looks like they have a nice collection of models on all 3 sites that you get, and some on Riot Girls is HD video. The one thing that I really remember well about the Bikini Riot content that I have is a huge watermark on the pictures, but they were nice pictures with good colors and lighting.
I had a chance to check this site out back in December for a week and was impressed with it. From what I remember all of the videos had 1280 max options and everything was exclusive to the site. I'm just not for sure why the $35 price at this point. When I was on the site it only had around 50 total sets and updated 3 times per week. The high quality is very nice as is the exclusivity of the content, but that price just seems too high to this porn user for a site that is just getting started. I always thought if I were them, I would package this site with the Cherry Jul site, since it is dead now and maybe the Sandy's Fantasy site since it is dead too. That would be a nice package of sites and I think it would be a good way to get this site noticed. But hey, what do I know?
You may be misunderstanding the review. It says exclusive content. Which means you've probably seen the models on other sites, but the scenes and shoots they have on this site can only be seen on this site. Notice in Maggie's review exclusive notes, "Yes, these are original scenes that were new to me."
I'm not into gay porn, but my wife likes the solo gay movies, she has a fetish for seeing men play with themselves. Just to let you know if you didn't already, dvdbox has over 200 gay DVDs, unlike most DVD sites that only have straight or g/g. Good quality on the clips too. $14.99 a month thru TBP.
Hey Denner, thanks for the heads up on All Pass. I am a big fan of their sites, but usually just stick with Pix and Videos with a combo deal of Club Sandy or Zoli. The Sophie Moone site had me interested as did the Open air site since it has 3-4 of Eve Angel that I hadn't seen. I did notice some of the Eve Angel vids are from Pix and Video and one with Sandy and Anetta Keys that is on Club Sandy. Several were in the pee pee babes site and that isn't really my cup of tea. I believe the ones I saw that I was interested in were playful fingers, sophie, open air and flexy. I would pay the $40 for just those 4 but I get the feeling that I wouldn't get those. On to searching out more Euros. Have you ever tried Superglam? The site looks great, and they have all of the best Euro models on it. I may take it for my last before starting back on my cycle of Euro sites. Thanks again.
I was very surprised at the site. I was worried that my review would come off as biased, but I still am (been a member for 2 weeks now) blown away with the site. Very few sites get multi-month memberships from me, but I believe I am going to stay awhile on EGG. Eve's videos and pics weren't even the ones that sold me on the site, which is saying something. Every single model on there is amazing. Maybe it is the way Martin films or photographs them? I've seen Eve's erotic/sensual side on her own site, but these other models, I hadn't seen theirs until this site. I kept waiting for someone to review it, but I had seen that "invest in your pleasure" screen enough on the preview that I decided to try it. I know where you are coming from on trying new sites out. There is one on the Gen. Entertainment sites called Balkan Amateurs, that I've considered joining, I think the TBP price is $9.99, but I've not seen many reviews of it yet. I'm looking for one more new one that I haven't tried yet. I'm considering the 21st sextury All-Access one, the price is not helping much near $40, but they have several videos of my favorites that I haven't seen yet.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Wow factor, huge pictures, great quality vids and gorgeous models in beautiful settings.
- Fast server, downloads are running above average speed for me.
- Very erotic and sensual pics and vids
- A lot of class with a touch of naughty
- More content and more touching than I expected
Cons:
- My pet peeve, music in the videos!
- I guess some might say it needs more models (99 as of right now), but quality over quanity anyday!
Bottom Line:
First an apology to the site. I've looked at it probably 10-15 times over the last year. Though I am into the glamour side and love European models, I hadn't joined.
None of the masturbation is that hardcore, but it is plenty enough for me. The pictures are just massive, upwards of 5k. Martin should be applauded for his work. This is right up there in the art category, but he is showing more than most art sites do. Think of it as a certain magazine with a bunny on it, except showing everything.
I'm completely blown away with the site. You get a daily update (pics 1 day, vid the next). I have always thought Anetta Keys was really cute, but wow, her pictures on here make me look at her much different. There is just a ton of sexuality in these pictures and videos. Don't be turned off by "only" 99 models, there are near 500 pic sets and 500 vids total. My apology comes from my stubborness not to join most Euro sites unless Eve Angel is on them. I hadn't checked the site lately, I go check last week and there are now 5 pic sets and 5 vids of her on there. These models all look very natural, I don't see many implants.
This site has finally shown me the erotic side of porn. I've tried the others Met-Art and Hegre Art, but neither has captured my attention the way this site does. If you like glamour and high quality, join now! None of the 99 models are skip overs, beautiful site, as high of a recommendation as I will give!
Follow-Up:
Similar to Pier999 losing points since I was grading them both on a glamour only curve. I lowered this site to an 89, still very highly recommended, but overall isn't better than multi-model, supersites like Twistys.
Hey Denner, we shouldn't hold our breath on that new site. I've been watching it since March, and no new news has come up about it. I don't know what is going on. Eve's wikipedia page says "She is opening a new exclusive website, Eve Angel Official, which is planned to open in the spring of 2009. It will be the only website on the Internet to have fresh sets of her".
I guess the spring they are talking about was the one that passed last month. I hope it opens soon.
Hey Drooler, I stumbled across that Euro Babe Index announcement a few weeks back while checking for any new Eve content. I was really worried at first since the picture showed Eve with Woodman, and I thought he was going to be running her site. That isn't really a bad thing, but his sites are mostly in French.
Then one day while brushing up on my psychology jargon, I somehow typed in Eve Angel on wikipedia and found out about the new DDF site. Gotta love being paid to search for Eve! Anyway, the site is here www.eveangeloffical dot com. Thing is, now I'm worried about it too. I remember what a mess DDF made of that Cherry Jul solo site and who can forget the ill-fated Sandy's Fantasies? I'm hoping his supposed deep love for Eve and what he calls, "A living sculpture of the perfect natural woman" will make him work harder on her site. We all know Eve can handle the daily update schedule, so fingers are crossed on this one. Also wondering if he will slap that DDF standard $35 a month on it right from the start.
Like I told badandy a few weeks ago when I found the new site, my dumbass will be there credit card in hand as soon as it opens, $35 or not. I signed up for the email updates that is on the splash coming soon page, but have only received one email so far and all it says is coming soon, spring 2009. Oh and if you haven't seen the splash page, be sure to go by and check it out, beautiful picture of Eve on her belly, side view of her butt. I would hope DDF runs with her elegant woman look she has in that one and most of her newer sets instead of trying to make her look younger.
Lawless, what happened, Eve's contract ran out with this website in January 2008. Somehow, the webmaster was able to continue to use her name, even though she no longer had any involvement in the site. So, anything released after January 2008 is old content. Has nothing to do with Eve, just the webmaster of the site and the group that runs the sites. If you will notice, TBP no longer does business with these sites. All of them, including Eve's site used to have a great $14.95 per month discount price and from May 2005-December 2007, there was a new daily update. In January 2008, the webmaster removed May 2005-2006 and has been re-releasing that content as new. Kind of a sad story really, as this was once the best solo site on the internet. The good news is, if you like Eve, she has a new site coming out that she will have full control over. It is www.eveangelofficial.com, you can sign up there to get new updated information in your email. Oh and about her forum, she quit posting on it in 2006 or 2007, they had one member that was posting threatening posts in it. You can check out her wikipedia page which was updated recently to explain some of it.
My best advice to you is to stop trying to talk down to me. "Thats how this stuff works" and "Comments are not supposed to become a debating issue."
According to the site, "What's the intention of replies? #4 says, "Engage in a related conversation or debate." When you question something I put in a review, it is my right to explain and if need be, debate my point. It is one of the rules of what the comments are for. I've been here since the site started, I know how the site works. Also, I noticed in one of your reviews that you talked about not being able to edit a review that you wished you had scored lower. From my own experiences, you can click "edit review" and change the score. I've done it on several sites that were not as good after the initial thought that a site was great. Try it and see.
I don't know what we are agreeing to disagree about. I glanced at your reviews, you gave Rachel Aziani's solo site a 91, it doesn't have half the content of Eve's site that I reviewed. And it only updates once per week, so it isn't going to get near Eve's amount of content anytime soon. So, I don't know why you would mention content vs. cost.
You think getting a negative review for giving a high score is bad? I took 20 points off a site's score because they had a 10 GB monthly download limit. I put in the review clearly that if the limit wasn't there, I would have gave the site a 90, instead of a 70. The site actually went back and removed their download limit and made it unlimited and I went back and added the 20 points back to the score, the negative review is still there though.
You said, "I tend to be picky and honest" the review is 100% honest, I tell that there is no new Eve content coming out, the amount of content, the quality of that content and so on, nothing dishonest there.
You don't seem to follow my concept of Eve not being involved anymore when you say the model should be involved in updates and should do a name change. There are 200+ videos of EVE, 200+ picture sets of EVE that are still there for download, why would they change the name? Also, about the name change, that isn't something for me to say. I think they should make it clear that they don't have any new Eve content, but why change the name of a site when more than half of the content there is of Eve Angel? That wouldn't make much sense.
Last, I do put the cons I can find, but I don't see why a con would stop a site from getting a 90+ score. If you look at the TBP reviews, the sites with 90+ have cons in the reviews. Also, if you look at solo models in the TBP reviews, you will see that Eve's site is listed as the #3 solo site by the TBP reviewers by score. At one time, it was #1. I do think that you agree that these are individual views, but then again, you are telling me how YOU would do a review or what you think should happen with the site name. If you ever need a site to join, try Eve's out, it is cheap at $15 and download all of her content off there. Like I said earlier, if we put these on DVDs there would be 30 four hour DVDs or 60 two hour DVDs worth of content with Eve in all of the scenes. Surely not having a daily update would be offset by getting what is equal to 25 cent two hour DVDs?
Few things on your comment. First, there is way too much emphasis put on current updates on all sites. Let me give you an example.
Lets say site A opened last month and has daily updates of Eve Angel content. By the time your month was up, you would have access to maybe 10 GB of content. This site has over 80 GB of Eve movies and around 30 GB of her pictures.
Each month, content of her on this site ranged between 3-8 new GB of content, when you look at the total number which is one of the largest sites of a solo model, it still has more content than the next 10 sites combined, that feature Eve. Going by that, the daily update isn't a big deal to me.
If you also notice, I reviewed it as a one month join site. It would take a month to download all of the content on the site, unless you downloaded it for 24 hours a day.
What I'm saying, which is worth more 3-8 new GBs of content per month or around 120 GB?
As for the updates, it still updates, the friends content is new to the site, the Eve content is old content they are recycling. And my main point is still, this is an Eve Angel site, for fans of her, 120 GB of just Eve for $15 is the best deal on the internet. That would be like getting 30 full length DVDs of her for $15.
The only way that the no new updates is a con is if you have all the content already on the site. If you have none of it, there are over 200 movies and 200 picture sets of Eve, you could just download one video and one photo set per day and say those were daily updates. See what I mean?
Last, I didn't take it as sarcastic, and can understand why you would question a score, but keep in mind that all of us are different in our tastes, in our understanding or in the concept of numbers, so the number I give the site shouldn't be the first thing you look at. Instead, look at the facts in the review, 400 video/pic sets of Eve Angel, that to me is near perfect.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- To me, Eve is the greatest of the solo models. Don't think that is unfair bias from me, I just have preferences and she fits all of them. Long dark hair, very shapely natural body, seductive eyes, and most of all, as a solo model, her masturbation scenes are generally some of the most believable on the internet.
- Video quality is good 640 high end with 2000 bitrate
- Picture quality is also good with full size photos coming it at 2000 high end, also has option to download smaller res pictures at 1200 high end. Pictures are in zips as well.
- Large amount of content for a solo site, over 80 GB just of Eve videos! About 60 GB of friends content. Around 350 video clips total and similar amount of photo sets
- That $15 TBP price is perfect for a month
- DL speeds are generally average or above
Cons:
- The worst con possible, Eve is no longer on the site. It is now recycling the first year's content from the archive and releasing it as new. On a side note, the new friends content, some of it is new to THIS site, but this site should be looked at as a archival site. Daily updates? Sure, of content released 3 years ago.
- This site's cons are very low. Quality is there, price is great, Eve is incredible, quantity is as high as many multi-model sites. The only major one I have heard is that Eve can be repetitive in her masturbation videos. But then again, when you join a solo site with a model who no longer does b/g scenes, what more can you expect? I've never tired of this content.
- Last month or two of 2007, updates are cut in 2 parts
Bottom Line:
Going back to my first review here on PU. This site to me is still well worth a one month join for those who have never joined it before. I went back for one reason and will explain so others can watch for it. Several video files in the early part of 2007 are corrupt, if you go back, you can download the .mov files of those and those work fine. I also had downloaded only the small picture zips for the year of 2007, so I wanted to get the big resolution versions.
I had a membership here for nearly 2 years, and loved every minute of it. The content can be repetitive, but so is eating pizza everyday, and I'd do that if not for the damage to my health. My point being, Eve is beautiful enough that repetitive is a good thing. I was reading some of the comments left by members and replied to by Eve. One of her last ones showed frustration when she says, "I had another set, but you all not want to see that skirt again". Like I said before, I could care less if she wears a potato sack.
The quality here is still well above average on the videos and pictures, if you join it, you can tell that at one time, this was the premier solo site on the internet. Now, it is the premier site to get Eve content. Over 200 videos of Eve and over 200 picture sets of Eve for $15? That is a great deal for Eve fans.
One other thing that I mentioned in the cons, the last month of 2007, the picture sets are split into 2 updates, as are the video updates. Believe me, that is frustrating with Eve. She takes a whole clip just to tease and get naked!
I honestly thought I would lower the score more than I did, but as a 1 month join, you just can't do much better than this site. It really is near perfect, except for the fact that the new content is from the 2005 archive.
Still is highly recommended, especially for solo fans and/or Eve fans. You aren't going to find much b/g here and the b/g you find will not have Eve in it, though there are maybe 30 g/g videos of Eve and her friends. The "important" checklist shows why this site still scores high. Zips...check, better than average resolution and bitrate movies...check, better than average picture resolution...check, really hot main model...check!
You make a good point, I do remember talking about Mya's site, but not personally remembering all of her content to remember if it was recycled. I will put this here so future members of Eve's site will know when the recycling started.
Not much of a surprise, but Eve's site didn't start recycling until January 1st 2008. I imagine her contract probably ran out in 2007, and since she didn't re-sign with them, they started doing the recycling.
There were a few hints that there was problems in October-December 2008 when nearly every new Eve set was split. You got one set one day, the rest of it the next day and the videos were even split in two days. Instead of the full set updates that they had been doing. There actually is a much easier way to notice which sets of Eve's are old and which are new.
In her newest sets, she looks to weigh about 25 pounds more than her old sets and her hair, in her newer sets has a reddish color to it. Her old sets, she is pretty slim and has jet black hair in those. You also can tell by just looking at her face and seeing the age difference, we are talking about a 3 year difference, so it is noticeable, especially to someone like me, who has over 150 GBs of her content.
The samples could work with one thing in mind, some sets are taken months in advance before release. Twistys and ATK Premium both had some older Eve sets that they had been holding back to release about one set a month. Look at her hair sometime and you will see the color difference. The newest set that is easy to find is on sportyone.com titled, Summer Fun with Naomy from Club Sandy. You can also see the extra weight Eve has, which I actually like, and you can see her hair color difference, since Naomy has jet black hair like Eve had before.
If you follow the footnote #1 it takes you to, which is Viv's forum, and if you scroll down 5 or so posts, you will see the post from Viv himself explaining what happened.
http://forum.vivthomas.com/index.php?showtopic=1119&st=600&start=600
As was reported by Viv Thomas, Eve Angel no longer has anything to do with this site. As myself and others have pointed out, the site is now recycling old Eve content by removing the content from the archives and selling it as new content. So there will be no more new Eve content on here. The site also have lost its 100% exclusivity. As several sets have now shown up on Teen Dreams and even worse, they have sold enough of the Eve content to another webmaster, that has enable this other one to open the site Marina Mendoza, which also has no connection to Eva, except that it has her content from this site on it.
I personally thought Eve had retired, but it looks more like she was the victim of a webmaster screwing her over. She does have some new content that has been showing up on the Teen Dream Network on the Sweet Eva site and new content that Viv has been releasing on his site. It looks like she is still around, just not as much as she used to be when this site first took off.
I thought I would post to warn others who have been members before. If you a potential new member, the site is easily worth the price of a month subscription because of the 200+ Eve videos and picture sets, but to a returning member looking for new sets, it just isn't going to happen.
As Porn Users biggest Eve fan, I can agree with you that this site is great for those who love Eve. There is one problem though. Just recently, announced by Viv Thomas, Eve is no longer associated with the site. See her wikipedia.org page to read about it. All of the "new" Eve content posted over the last few months, is not new at all. They just cleaned out about the first 4 months of the site and are re-releasing it as new material. The other girls, those are new, but no new Eve content for this site, ever again.
Very disappointing for me since I love this site and had been a member for nearly 2 straight years, having bought a 6 month membership one time and a year membership another time.
Similar to what you talk about, my wife also likes Eve, so we both have always enjoyed her content. I've found some new content of her recently at Viv's site, but I think she is nearing retirement. She is very close with Viv, and he seems to be acting as her spokesperson now.
Been meaning to reply to this. I have that clip with her on Clara's site, actually found it a bit disturbing! Eve seemed to enjoy her time wearing the strap on, more than I thought she would, but the clip is pretty good. I have picked up several old movies of Eve that a friend had on DVDs, including a gangbang scene, though it wasn't what I thought it would be. It starts with Eve and several other women having sex with a guy, then more guys join and it turns into a 5 on 4 situation. Eve does a little in it, but most of the time she is sitting over to the side, touching herself. She does take the money shots though and that surprised me. Also got one where she is with an older guy on the couch that is probably the best b/g scene, I have seen of her. I think the date on the gangbang one was 2002, and this other was 2003, so these were still when she was really slim and hairy pubic area.
You have to think if Eve didn't shave, she would have one heckuva afro growing between her legs by now! Still no news on new content from her site. She does have a HD video on that new Euro network that says it was filmed in 2008, but the $35 pricetag is a little much to join. I do know that when Eve first started porn, she was not 18, Pierre Woodman was who started her in porn and he had to send her home for a month until she turned 18. Which if you ever see the video of his private casting of Eve, it would probably make you sick. She was 1 day over 18 and he has her in anal within 20 minutes. Her moans sound like a wounded animal. It is really bad and not ever recommended for anyone who likes her to watch.
I was going to post a comment about the new updates. Also of note, the "new" Eve sets in 2008 are from 2005's archives, the old recycling trick. Check out the first month of the archives to see everything but one or two sets gone. And that one you mention of Eve that links to the blonde isn't the only one that does that, there is another back in June 2005 that does the same thing except to what looks like an older model.
I came back to get the December videos of Eve, and also, if you collect her videos from this site and download the .wmv files, there are several that do not work. I think I counted 9 in 2007 that will not let you control the fast forward or rewind, so I went back and got those in .mov files and those work fine. I still have not heard anything about what happened to Eve, but I have to wonder after seeing those wedding lingerie pictures, if maybe that was our hint? Strangely enough, the newest content I have seen of her is on the Teen Dreams Network on Sweet Eva, which is strange since most of those Sweet sites are not exclusive like advertised, but they have a couple of sets that I had never seen before and would like to think that I have most everything of her on the internet. One of the new ones she is in all-leather biker type outfit with a skulls bandanna on, pretty good, though she still looks way too sweet for that look!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
