Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
++ Good $3, 3 day full access trial through TBP
++ 17 site network
++ Exclusive Evil Angel content though some of it may be on other sites
+ No cross sales on signup
+ Some 720 sized HD vids
+ Fast download rates (about 1.5 mb/sec on a single download, about half that for 2-3 channels of simultaneous downloading)
+ Lots of anal and fetish vids for those into that
+ No DRM
+ A good number of recognizable porn stars
+ 100's of scenes / dvds spread across the network in a variety of niches
+ Several updates per week
Cons:
-- Crappy search function and no cross site search
-- Photosets are worthless and no zip function
- HD streaming vids are pretty choppy even on my broadband connection
- A lot of sites have some overlapping content
- Video quality varies from great to crap
- Many scenes and DVDs lack model info and scene tags
- My computer crashed a few times during downloads (not if this is the site but this rarely happens to me)
- Limited number of HD movies on each site, older vids are pretty low in quality
- If you're from Canada, read the terms and conditions before signing up, it's sort of messed up for the up north folks.
- Some of the featured directors sites have actors and/or directors yammering on during the scenes.
Bottom Line:
Other than the prospect of a cheap full access trial I don't know why I really signed up this site and I guess it shows in my score. For the uninitiated, this site is part of a 17 Evil Angel site network. Evil Angel tends to lean to the harder side of hardcore so don't expect much gentle solo softcore/midcore and story line material in the hardcore. Here's the bottom line:
PICS: In the network, most sites have only a handful of pics for their scenes. Most pics are just pose shots before the action. No zips. Good sized but only 30 to 40 pics per set. Quality and cropping varies. Skip this place if you want pics.
VIDS: All the sites have some 720p vids that download as MP4 files. All offer a high and low bitrate wmv download as an option. Most come in at 640x480 for the "high" quality content (non HD). All scenes have low and high level streams and the HD ones also offer HD stream but that was choppy even on my high speed connection. Fast download speeds but streaming took about 5 seconds to buffer on the "high" setting for me each time I jumped within a scene. Most quality is average while the majority of scenes are professionally shot with good lighting.
NAV: Navigation needs work. No model directory and no cross site search. Many sites have scene tags but many don't and not all are correct. No model info for many scenes so you're stuck if you want to find out who some hottie is. On each site you can search by movie title but the listings don't include all the movies on the site. Basically, lots of hunting and clicking to find what you want.
Overall, I can't really recommend joining unless you're a bit Evil Angel fan (in which case you've probably seen most of this stuff) or you're a collector looking to find specific porn stars. A lot of these sites have DVD series but even most of the series are just random or incomplete. This whole network feels a bit like an after thought, which it may well be in comparison to the official EvilAngel website (never joined that one so I don't know for sure). Videobox and similar sites offer a lot more content for the money once you get beyond the 3 day trial period.
Once you get beyond the known pornstars, the girls are fairly average looking and the production quality can vary quite a bit. I didn't find a lot that personally appealled to me and even with the crappy navigation / search, it only took me a few hours to scan over the offerings in the areas I was interested in. Average be this place so average be the score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Good price (7 day full access trial for $10)
+ Decent amount of content (about 100 pic sets, 100 vids and 25 webcam shows)
+ Hot MILF with great legs and tight bootie who covers the whole range of porn
+ Weekly live webcam
+ All vids and cam shows have description of what happens
Cons:
- Cross sales on signup page
- No zips on pic sets
- No update schedule and unsure how often it really does update
- Video quality average at best
- Navigation needs work
- Lots of advertising and cross promotions
Bottom Line:
I usually avoid single model sites but decided to chance it here with Brandi and her banging hot bod. Brandi is an amateur MILF in late 30's early 40's who has a fitness body that most men wish their wife or GF had. She covers the whole gambit on her site, from HC to lez to fetish to swinger to toys to uniform to glam .... She does put a lot of time into her site but overall the site needs some work.
Pics: This is where the navigation sucks. She has a pic page with about 10 different categories. However, clicking on a category takes you into the same big archieve that you have to page through. Just one thumbnail to show what it's in the gallery so you have to look at each one to see what's really there. No page jumps, just forward and backward. No zips either. Pic sizes are all over the board from worthless and tiny screen caps to 2300x3500 in your face puntang depending on the set (you don't know until you click). Most of the pics are of good quality but I wish there was more for each set. You get at most 100 in a set and often only about half that. Some sets are continuations of earlier sets but that's not really clear until you get into them. Cropping is not one of her strong points either although part of that problem is that she uses a lot of stills from an HD camcorder for the photo gallery.
Videos: There about 100 now. You get four download choices (who the hell still downloads "Real" vids?). No scenes, just full vids. Problem is that most vids are 380x280 and of amateur quality. I wasn't expecting professional stuff as this is an amateur site but the quality still lacked for me. The webcams were OK but they are also fairly small sized. Brandi, boost your vid sizes and get a tripod if the operator can't hold the cam still! You get about 30 HC vids and the rest are solo, lez and in a few other categories.
The webcam archieve is pretty good and with about a dozen HC cam shows out of 25 total shows. Each show runs about a half hour.
She does do a good job of promoting herself. She has a blog but it's loaded with cross sale stuff and isn't deeply personal, mostly chat about her swinger lifestyle. She is big on the swinging lifestyle and has a lot of links for those who are into that.
There is some teaser "friends" stuff from other amateur sites but you don't get anything but a few very shot vids and small pic sets so I just call that advertising.
Brandi does enjoy what she's doing and that does come through in the pics and vids. So, I give her an "A" for effort. The execution could be better by enlarging the picture sets, fixing some of the dead links, improving video size and quality and getting some zips done on the pics. It's not a bad site but there's nothing that will keep me here beyond the trial period.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ 5 site network (4 HC, 1 Lez)
+ Good TBP $5, 3 day full access trial
+ Some exclusive content which updates once a week
+ Some HD vids
+ A slew of nonexclusive material (1000's of pic sets and vids covering softcore, HC, lez, IR, etc.)
Cons:
- Painfully slow download speeds
- Navigation and search is poor especially when dealing with nonexclusive material
- Exclusive material quality is only average
- Incomplete model directory and scene tags
Bottom Line:
I find this strange to say but the nonexclusive content is what makes this site, not their original stuff and that ain't saying much. Here's the breakdown:
ORIGINAL CONTENT: 5 sites all link together. Pics come in at 800x1200 and all have zips - pics appear to be HD screen caps and aren't as complete as the vids. Vids come in streaming, 820x480 and 1280x720 HD and include clips and full scenes. The download speeds suck, around 150 kb/sec. The 820 and 1280 sized vids (roughly 700 mb and 1 gig in size) are almost impossible to download due to the length of time it takes. The quality is only average. You get iffy lighting and production but and the girls are teens/20's but only average looking. There is only one update each week between the five sites. Most only have about 12 sets so far.
NONEXCLUSIVE MATERIAL: This was the best part of the site. There are literally 1000's of photos sets and vids from about 15 to 20 production houses. You also get access to 380 DVDS but those are pretty old titles. Three big problems here. First, navigation is a pain. You can only jump 5 pages at most - not cool when dealing with this volume. Second, search is limited. You can search by about 20 categories. Then you can search by tags within categories. Tags and categories and model directory are all incomplete and sometimes mixed up (you get teens in the MILF section, some HC sets don't appear in the HC category, etc.) Also, porn stars who have multiple names require multiple searches - no cross referencing. Third, you don' know what you're getting unto you dig into it. Pic sizes range from 600 to 2500, you can only find out by clicking on pics to see what you can get before you try to zip or view further. Vids are similar, you don't know if it's partial scenes or full scenes and the quality and sizes are all over the board (no HD nonexclusive vids though). Couple this "hunt and peck" search method with the slow speeds and it's a royal pain in the ass.
As a plus, you get a lot of major production stuff (at times it looked like a Twistys or PaulMarkham or LegSex clone site) and you get Devils Film shots and other good stuff. So there is good stuff there but you have to spend a lot of time looking for it although you can search by production house if you want.
If they shelled out some coin for some servers and bandwidth and improved their search and navigation this site could easily score in the 80's. As it exists now, I can't really recommend it. If you do join you get the option of a $10 per month for life discount when you cancel but there's nothing here you can't really see within the trial period unless you plan on downloading a lot ... in which case it may take your lifetime to get it all ;)
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Great TBP full trial prices ($1 for 2 days, $12.50 for a month)
- 8 network sites focusing on eastern euro girls plus some standard 3rd party feeds
- Large photos (up to 1400 x 920)
- Videos are generally of good quality but only average sized (450 x 335 at the highest end)
- No DRM
- Content pretty much exclusive but I did find a couple of sets that I had seen elsewhere
Cons:
- Content is mostly average and only about 4 of the network sites are worth looking at
- Have to re-enter username/password for each site
- No zips for photos
- Some advertising on some of the sites
- I had some issues with the billing company here but they were resolved
- Photo updates don't come very often and the sites update vids a few times per month
Bottom Line:
Overall, this isn't a bad network. I joined on the cheapo $1 for 2 days trial (you have to join an individual site, not the network to get this deal). I will note that going this route will result in a $40 monthly membership charge if you don't cancel (obviously this is where they're looking to make money). You also need to login under the heading "full membership", not "trial membership" on the login page. Why? I have no clue but this is how it worked.
When I went to cancel through the processing company (crmedialtd.com) they did not recognize my member info. I used the on-line chat function and got cancelled but my member info never appeared on the billing processor's site so this might be a red flag. Also, be aware that if you sign up for the trial, there are other "prechecked" trials on the bottom of the signup page; a nasty practice in my book.
Overall, the content wasn't bad. I found that I liked tasty18and19, bridesonblacks, and tastydildos the best. There are some solo model sites as well but exoticsforme pretty much covered them in his review so I won't delve into them here. Teensonblacks and the mature site were worthless. You also get access to 9 3rd party vido feed sites which are nonexclusive obviously.
Tasty18and19.com was pretty good with 77 photo sets and 82 movie sets with about 1/3 being hardcore. All photos were large, had small watermarks and were generally good quality. The girls were all pretty good looking. You also get access on this site to 420 streaming full lenght dvd's (nonexclusive) and 36 amateur girl vids (only downloadable in 2 minute clips). This site has the most content and most frequent updates of the network.
Bridesonblacks has no relationship to wedding day hookups. It's just an interracial site. They had about 30 photo sets and 60 vids. The newest photos were 1400x930 but about 2/3 were 1020x700. The girls ranged from young to mature. The photosets seemed to have stopped updating and the vids rarely update. I will note that all the vids can now be downloaded as full scenes. This site definitely had more of an amateur feel in terms of quality of the material.
Overall the quality was decent but certainly not high definition. Almost all the material is exclusive and the women are generally pretty good looking. I pretty much saw all I needed to on the 2 day trial but if you like the content the no zips will slow you down so the monthly $12.50 membership might be the way to go. Either way you go there isn't a lot of updating so there is no need to stay longer.
I'm scoring this a 77 because while the quality is decent there is not a ton of it and the updates don't come all that often on most sites. The billing processor problem/"gotcha" also counted against them here. It's a decent network but not the cream of the crop.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large number of models
- Easy Navigation
- User interaction (ratings and feedback)
- Directory of almost all models
- Preview options for vids
- Numerous vid download options including podcast
- Small Medium & Large pics with zip available
- Young attractive models (18-22) with no exceptions
- For a $2.95 trial you can't really go wrong
Cons:
- Nonexlusive content that has been around for years
- When searching I came across some models that were not listed in the model directory
- Repetive content
- Content rotates
- Pics not in high rez although they do go larger than full screen
Bottom Line:
I've looked at this site for a while and finally did the $2.95 trial. If you have been downloading porn for any length of time you'll quickly notice that this stuff has been around for years. None of the content, from what I could tell, is exclusive. For me it was a trip down memory lane and an opportunity to download a few things that were wiped out years ago. There are 100 boy/girl sets with about 1/3 of those being videos; about 150 lesbian sets and hundreds of solo model sets.
For newbies who don't mind 90's looking and dressed euro models, I reccommend the site. For those who have been around a while I would join only if you haven't seen this stuff before. Generally, I only found a few vids and picture sets that I haven't seen before but I'm sure would be on another site like Karupspc or similar site.
I did like the multiple picture sizes (large typically goes slightly bigger than full screen), zip features, and model directory. I did come across some models when using the search function that weren't in the directory.
I have noticed when looking at the site previously that there is content rotation. Also, the format is pretty much the same for the models and it can get repetitive.
If there was exclusive content or more boy/girls sets I would score this site in the mid 80's. As it is now, it's worth the trial.
I will note that when you cancel you have an option to continue for $19.95 per month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ 30 site network with a lot of exclusive content in many niches (about 3200 scenes – about 85% hardcore) with a lot of Eastern Euro girls you won't see elsewhere.
+ Good download speeds (about 2-3 MB/sec).
+ Newer content has 1900x1080 vids and pics going up to 3500x2300.
+ Bills through Epoch.
+ Lots of cute “girl next door” Russian models with few tats and almost no implants.
+ Zip files for pics
+ In browser stream works well though I had to lower the resolution on newer vids to get smooth playback.
+ TBP discount is $20, half off the regular price.
Cons:
- Of the 30 sites, only 4 are currently updating and only about 6 have updated in the last 5 years.
- The vast majority of content is dated in terms quality (vids are mostly 520x280 and pics 1200x800).
- The photoviewer is clunky to use.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup and a tricky signup button.
- Only updates about once a week and about half the updates are nonexclusive.
- On nonexclusive content, model names are different than from other sites.
- No real model info though the directory seems complete.
- Not enough tags for any real type of search beyond each site or all content
- A lot of the content has an amateur production feel but it's not terrible.
- What little conversation there is in the vids is in Russian.
- Site overall is pretty repetitive in terms of content and how it's produced. No real reason why there are so many sites when the content frequently overlaps.
Bottom Line:
Full disclosure: I joined this site knowing what I was getting into. I had previously joined this site over 10 years ago (it was under a different name then) and sort of liked the photo content but one of the files I had with the content got corrupted. I also recognized a lot of the newer stuff as Teenmegaworld content on the previews so I basically joined in a fit of nostalgia. And nostalgia is what you get. With so few sites updating the vast majority of content is 2008 or earlier. The net effect is cute Russian lasses sporting underwear that was probably the height of fashion in the Soviet era; sets featuring fine hand me down furniture that only a gulag worker could love; and in the videos, scenes so lacking in sexual intensity and chemistry that it makes you believe the whole country was filled with sexual atheists then. Because so much of the content is old, you also get lots of fabulous electronica music scores that play throughout the whole scene.
What I'm effectively saying is that unless you enjoy lower resolution vids with the sound turned down that is primarily a picture site provided you can handle mostly 800x1200 sized pics. Still I kind of liked it because the girls are mostly ones you don't or didn't see elsewhere and they are pretty cute, having that eastern euro “girl next door” look and they aren't all tatted and siliconed up. Here's a quick run down:
PICS: Like I said, most fall in the 1200x800 size and all scenes have pics with zips. There are roughly 100 scenes in total that have larger sizes. As usual, a lot of the pic scenes don't have as much content as the vids.
VIDEO: Again, due to the lack of updates there aren't as many 1080 scenes as the low rez 520x280; probably a few hundred scenes and some of those are just standard rez scenes enhanced to HD sized. The early scenes have a lot of music throughout and the action isn't very hot. All dialogue is in Russian and only a few vids have subtitles.
NAV: Navigation is fine if you go site by site as opposed to viewing all the updates across the network when you run into pagination issues. Tags are worthless because there aren't enough of them. Model info is basically worthless. However, the stream function works fine and downloading is easy. Video download files need better naming too.
Signup can be a bit tricky. There is a prechecked cross sale and the actual sign up page, there are four boxes outlining the payment options and a box below that says “Create account for 30 sites”. If you don't click the monthly membership box above the “Create account” box, the confirmation page will want to automatically sign you up for a year in a manner you may not catch. I almost got burned by this.
With the lack of updates and the large quantity of older low rez content, unless you're a photo collector who is willing to tolerate a bunch of 800x1200 sized pics of cute Russian girls banging away it's probably not worth joining. The exception would be if you're into old/young content as there is a good amount of that that's exclusive and not all low rez. So, if you want to revisit the internet porn world from the early 2000's, this is a good place to do it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Scored a $10 Black Friday monthly membership from TBP (currently $18)
+ No cross sales on signup. Bills through Epoch.
+ Mostly attractive US models on the main sites.
+ Very basic web design but it works and getting around is easy.
+ Decent download and stream speeds
+ Good production standards (usually).
+ Good streaming video function in standard, 720 or 1080 for most vids.
+ Almost all scenes have pics and vids.
+ Good mix of known pornstars and amateurs.
Cons:
- This is a four network site and the only one that has any reasonable amount of content is Fuckedhard18. The rest are throwaway sites.
-No model info, just a girls first name. Limited search due to funky tagging.
- Limited updates (Fuckedhard18 no longer updates).
- Most pics are 1020 x 680 or less so it's not really a pic site.
- Fuckedhard18 is highly repetitive in its use of the set, shooting angles and “plot” development.
- The whole site is pretty much an advertisement to buy porn from other sites.
Bottom Line:
Like many Americans, I was still tripping on turkey tryptophan when I scored a cheap deal on a Black Friday and quickly came to regret the quality of my purchase. I sort of like the massage themed stuff which is what Fuckedhard18 is but I got pretty much caused me to abandon this network fairly quickly. Well, let's just break this network down by site since that seems like it will cause me the least amount of pain:
Newgirlpov: A 15 scene vanity project for the guy shooting it. Girl gets interviewed, screwed a little, dances in her undies to music and has more sex with the dude who makes her call him “Daddy”. Every actress gets a perfect score in the ratings categories the producer lists on every scene page. Yay, participation trophies for all. Just a few pics associated with the clips here. Nothing here you haven't seen done better elsewhere.
FuckedhardGFS: About 100 scenes of mostly pornstars posing and having sex in about 1/3 of the scenes. Hasn't updated in years. More amateur in terms of production value. Interesting but the quality is only OK.
Bangable: About 200 scenes of random amateur chicks in various states of undress dancing and prancing to music in video scenes that mostly 1 – 3 minutes long (almost no pics). WTF? The only thing that could have made this site enjoyable was if Rick Astley's “Never Give You Up” video came up in the background of every scene because to even call this erotica is just a Rickroll.
Fuckedhard18: About 350 scenes and no updates. To describe one scene is describe every single one. Girl walks onto cheapo massage parlor set, strips and gets interviewed by massage dude about pointless stuff. Guy fingers girl, they have sex in 4 or 5 positions while the guy sometimes still chats with her and gives onscreen direction (aka – no romance factor and little connectivity between the actors). Every scene is pretty much the same and involves the same positions and camera angles. The fact that every scene looks and plays out the same sort of killed it for me. Granted, the girls are good looking and some of the sex was OK but it wasn't enough to overcome the monotony for me.
TBP lists pics here as 1500x1020 but that's only for about 10% of the scenes. The rest feature 1500x1020 shots of the model posing but all of the action is shot in landscape mode and only reaches 1020x680. All scenes have zips.
I downloaded very little video so I didn't really track the specs on the vids and can only say they seem decent. No problems streaming or jumping around in a vid while streaming. The video download options are sometime weird: sometimes you get mp4 and wmv options, sometimes one or the other. I found that the “HDUltra” download option is 1080, the “Mp4HD” is 720 and anything else is either 480 p or standard def.
Be aware that there are 22 sites listed in the pull down menu on the homepage. At first it looks great cause it shows Wowgirls, JulesJordan, JoyMi and others. The downside is that there is about 10 scenes for each of these sites and the quality available is less than you get from those actual sites. Basically, this networks seems to be geared towards generating cross sales to these places.
Overall, this site seems like it's dead or dying and you're better off saving a few pesos by skipping this one unless you're really into massage content.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Decent 2 day, $5 full access trial through TBP
+ Mostly exclusive material (more than 50% I'd say)
+ No DRM
+ 5 sites have HD video
+ 13 sites to choose from
+ Network wide search function for girls, acts, etc.
Cons:
- Primarily a video site, although they advertise pics they generally aren't that good
- Quality varies from excellent to total crap
- Prechecked membership boxes on signup form
- Some of the usual 3rd party bonus sites but can't view the content (lure to sign you up only)
- Pics have no zips and all pics for the set appear on one page and individual pics come up in separate window
- Sporadic updates
Bottom Line:
This is a network that doesn't quite know where it's going. It has some more mainstream sites but then throws in some more extreme sites. The network advertises pictures but for the most part the quality is average at best while sizes go from 1600x1200 to useless small screencaps. The vids are the most consistent in quality and quantity with the standard being 640x480 wmv with decent download speeds and some HD sites tossed in.
The following are the sites I'd score in the 70's:
Iloveyouceleste; Iloveyoumya; Iloveyoumelanie; Iloveyoumadison. All sites have about 32 vids and 22 pic sets (1000x720). The vids go HD here (up to 1440x1080). All the girls are relatively attractive and they do solo, HC, toys and lesbo. The girls often appear in each other's sites so there is a lot of overlap. Each also has a pointless and brainless diary.
Attackmyass. Has pics, 35 sets, up to 1500x1000 but most are 1000x750). Vids, about 80, are average. Mostly outside content with known pornstars.
Pleasebegentle. Younger pornstar sex with 66 vids and only a couple of photosets. Vids are average but good quality.
Chopsticksluts. Nonoriginal asian porn with average quality at best.
The following, in my opinion, fall at or below the "Mendoza Line" score of 70:
Pornstarsolos: 77 average sized vids and 60 pic sets (most 800x1200). Nothing original here and some photo sets are just partials.
Asssmoothie: This I don't quite get. You see girl, girl strips, girl fires up the blender, girl lays on floor and dumps goo in her booty, girl pushes goo out the tail pipe and then it goes down the hatch. Breakfast of champions, mmmm. This is the same setup for virtually every set; all 150 vids and 52 pic sets. They have HD vids here which is a waste because if you've seen one you've seen 'em all.
Swirliegirls: High school nerd abuse? Not really, just another site I don't get. Every scene (25 pic and 25 vid which are OK) has a girl in a toilet doing some violent bj stuff and then getting her head flushed. Tries to be brutal but most of it isn't. Again, everything is the same in every scene.
Herlastfuck: This is like a slow motion car wreck, you know it's going to hurt but you just have to peek. The vids are average at best and the pics are worthless. It's all seriously ancient eastern euro women looking for some rubles after the Soviet Union collapsed and their pensions disappeared. I couldn't bring myself to wach the 86 yr old woman give a bj. Fat and nasty is the theme here.
There are a few more sites here which, again, have varying quality and pretty standard content and rate high 60's or low 70's but they don't merit any real discussion. With such a range of quality, only OK photos, and sporadic updates I couldn't score this site in the 80's. Given that so much is average, average be the score.
I did the 2 day trial and that was more than enough to take what I wanted and get out. Don't bother with the month here
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ 100's of vids and 100k photos
+ Many photos come in at 1500x1200 and all files have zip
+ No DRM
+ Good customer service
+ 3 day full access trial for $6 through TBP
+ Updates daily
+ No watermarks (99% of the time)
Cons:
- Nonexclusive content
- Mostly American asians, no Urabon and few "asian" women
- Most vids come in clips
- Many HC photo sets are incomplete
- Quality varies
- Navigation on a site this big needs work
Bottom Line:
Overall, I would have to say there is nothing special about this site. As the content is nonexclusive the quality of the photos and vids can vary. Like I noted, it's mostly American porn here although it gets more amateur and asian in the solo girl sections. Here's how it breaks down:
PHOTOS: 360 HC, 130 Lesbian and 1000 solo sets all of which have zips. About half the photos come in at 1500x1200 and most of the rest come in at full screen (1020). Some of the photos are from screen caps so they can be grainy or blurry but most are pretty good but certainly not high def. A lot of the HC sets are incomplete and out of order or feature bj's only so there wasn't a lot to pick from there. A lot of the sets seemed the same to me after a while.
VIDEOS: There are 3rd party links to full length dvd's and videos. Most of the vids are in their "in house" section. Here, the majority can only be download in clips. Most come sized in 320x240 for wmv and 640x480 for mpeg. It streamed for me at about 400 kps. The quality is mostly good but can vary. There are no screen caps.
Navigation is OK and there is some advertising on the site. They have a search function that is just OK (can't search by scene content or body type) and limited model information. Customer support is good and it bills through ccbill.
While the site updates daily most of the updates are softcore. You get one vid and one photo set a day it looks like. HC and lesbian sets/scenes update infrequently.
If you've had limited exposure to asian porn the site is decent. If you're a fan of asian porn there probably isn't much here you haven't seen before or would want to keep. I got everything I wanted within the 3 days so I couldn't see staying for month.
Overall, average site, average score. Book it Dan-o.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Large amount of all hardcore content (700+ DVD's with about 4200 total scenes).
+ Updates several times a week, averages about once a day.
+ Mostly exclusive content (some teenmegaworld content being added now).
+ Get access to their parody vids.
+ Mostly professional production values.
+ Good TBP price of $15 month
Cons:
- Navigation, tags, search and model directory all suck.
- Almost all scenes use condoms if that's an issue for you.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup, lots of advertising within the site itself. Site has upsells too.
- Live shows are dead (but you can buy old ones).
- Not really a picture site (almost all scenes have pics with zips though).
- Poor file labelling (just numbers)
- Download speeds are all over the place (I ranged from 1-2 mb/sec to about 100 kb/sec)
- Lots and lots of very generic porn that gets old fast with a lot of the same contract girls.
- Lighting can be really bad at times.
- Oldest vids are very low quality and I couldn't get many to play. Reliable scenes only go back to about '93/94 but are, understandably, quite low res.
- Lots of music in the vids that continue up to only a few years ago.
- You don't necessarily get all the new Wicked updates, new updates can be content that was released years ago (I think you you have to upgrade to get the hot "new" stuff).
Bottom Line:
I was debating whether to even review this one but the lack of recent reviews sort of made me buckle down with a few drinks and pound this crap out. In short, I was a member here back when the pyramids were being built and thought it was a decent site. However, my return was met with a completely overhauled site that left me scoring it a 73 only for the shear volume of content. Here goes nothing:
PICS: The newest scenes have awesome sized pics (2500x1600) but the pic counts are very low. It's only in 2013 and earlier that you get any decent number of pics (pics end in 2006). However, by late 2011 the pic sizes drop to 800x500 which is pointless by today's standards unless you like looking at pics on your phone. The pics all have large watermarks too.
VIDS: The newest vids are good sized and look good. However, by late 2011 the quality quickly drops and you get a lot of psuedo HD stuff (540 HD) that it just OK looking. Music starts appearing in the middle of the action as well. Had some issues with vids being way too dark. Lots of closeup shots and a lot of single camera viewpoint shots (guys, at least move the camera around once in a while).
NAV: This part really sucks. You got 84 pages of scenes that come up and you can only jump 2 pages at a time (note, just type in the page you want in the url address to avoid this). The scenes are poorly tagged, too generically tagged to be useful or not tagged at all. The model directory is not complete and often misses the group scenes. Model directory can't be searched alphabetically, only searchable by "likes" and "recently added". You get the point yet?
Overall, I can't recommend this site unless you got the royal hots for some of their contract stars and want to complete your collection. Too much "blah" generic action that, if you couldn't see the naughty bits, would be featured on late night HBO. Lots of hot girls but the action and way it's shot with lots of closeups and fixed cameras just dulled my brain. Basically, this site seems more like a dumping ground for Wicked as opposed to an online flagship effort.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ $8, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ No DRM
+ Mostly exclusive content
+ Mostly attractive shaved Eastern Eurpean hotties in stockings
+ 296 photo sets of about 100 pics each with no watermarks
Cons:
- Update schedule irregular (3+ months since the last update at the time I joined)
- Photo quality a bit grainy
- No zips on photo sets
- No search function and no model info
- Only 46 vids of mediocre quality
- Some cross marketing for their other sites
Bottom Line:
No way to sum this one up other than your standard eastern european goulash. The site caters to the 18-23 hotties who parade around in their stockings. The offerings are pretty softcore.
Pictures: This is basically a pic site. All pics come in at 1200 by 800 with "nyet" zips. I counted about 15 h/c sets, a couple of lez and the rest were solo with only about 30 playing with toys out of the 296. I was a little miffed because a lot of the pics appeared a bit grainy to me. Part of this is because I'm thinking these are old sets and some may be scanned. I recognized some of the sets (it's mostly exclusive from what I can tell) and they date back to maybe around the year 2000. A few sets were obviously nothing but screen caps. Still the quality was acceptable for the most part.
Videos: You'd have more fun eating undercooked borscht than watching these things. I only downloaded a few but they were grainy, come only in WMV format, and clocked in size-wise at 350x290. They also chew up a lot of space for the quality you get (100 to 500 mb per clip). Most are split scenes, not whole vids. You get about 20 h/c scenes. Most of these scenes do not have picture set equivalents.
The site has an amateurish feel to it. No search, no model info. Just 15 pages of photo sets and 4 pages of vids. There are about 65 models here so most have multiple sets to offer. Most of the girls were cute and I admit that I did download about 50 sets but what a pain given the lack of zips.
This site gets a 73 for iffy quality, irregular updates (we all like to be regular, don't we?), no model info or search function, no zips and lack of quantity and quality of video. What saves it from dipping below the Mendoza Line of 70 is the quanity of decent looking babes.
It costs you $8 for a 3 day trial. Don't worry, you'll be done in a day if you decide to go. Don't bother going back.
I will note that when you cancel (billing through ccbill) you get an offer to continue at $15 a month. If you join up you'll also get access to 10 other sites that the webmasters own. Assuming what they have to offer on those sites is like here, I obviously opted to save a few bucks. Somebody needs to call the Kremlin and tell that the USSR is kaput and they need to get with the times.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Reasonable Trial Price
- 10 Site Access
- Generally Good Photo Quality
- No DRM
- OK video with various download features
- Exclusive content
Cons:
- Limited Updates
- No zip on photos
- Slowish download speeds on videos
- Navigation could use improving
Bottom Line:
The name of this site should be changed from "Allinclusivepass" to "Allwegotpass". I had been a member several years ago and after a computer crash I decided to come back to replace what I lost. Basically, the content was unchanged. Only about half the sites seemed to have any real updates in the last year and only 2 or 3 of the sites seemed to have any real regular updates. Most of the sites have around 20 sets to choose from, some more and some less.
There are some interesting niches with the "Sleepassault", "Motherdaughterfuck" and "Usemydaughter" sites but, again, the lack of quantity and updates hurts.
The photos come in at full screen or larger and are OK in quality. The vids are generally just OK.
I don't have much to say that Roseman didn't include in his review. So the bottom line is this: The material you get is fine for a trial membership but there isn't enough quantity, quality or updates to stick around for any length of time. Join once and you probably don't need to go back.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ 8 member network
+ $6, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ Probably over 5000 photo sets (1020x680) with zip.
+ Thousands of video scenes
+ No DRM or download limits
+ Cancellation is easy (you know it's bad when this makes it as a "pro")
Cons:
- Almost entirely nonexclusive content
- Search engine does not work. Finding anything of value is a royal pain.
- Quality is poor to average
- Majority of pic sets have fewer than 20 pics
- Majority of vids available only as clips
- Each site updates once a week.
Bottom Line:
I really was hoping for more when I signed up, thinking that for $6 (I got off cheap) I would find some OK stuff. NOT!!!
Let's start by saying if you have ever been to a Deny DeFranco (DDF) site, Vivthomas, Karupspc, etc. you've seen all there is of value seeing here. All the content from the last few years appears to be shot by these major studios. It wouldn't be so bad but that the quality is worse (downgraded for this network) and often times you don't get the full scene at least for the pics. Some of the oldest material, mostly photos, I don't recognize so I can't say it's all nonexclusive.
Swank (and all the accompanying network sites) are originally magazine based. Like most magazine sites, they seem unable to make a decent leap to the web; unwilling to shake off what they do in print in hopes of actually having long term economic viability. Swank is apparently betting the farm that some fool will spend money on their mags in the future because they're not investing anything here.
You figure with a network the search would be a great way to bring things together. Nope. The search don't work. You can only browse by vids or pics or model directory. Oh yeah, a lot of sets don't have model names attached to them so good luck.
It gets worse because several of the sites have over a thousand pic sets. It gets worse again because some of these sites don't tell you on the pic preview pages how many pics are in a set so it's hunt and peck (some sets 4 pics, some 300: What's behind the curtain Monty?). It's just too exhausting to hunt and peck through the mounds of reheated content to find the occasional gem. While pic sets go back over a decade it's only the last few years of material where the sets have more than 20 pics per set. Guess what, some of the network sites won't even tell you what year the set was published ... more hunt and peck for gems ... more swearing. Oh yeah, some of the pics only max at 800 pixels despite the fact you click on the icon for large photos. Most of the content is solo, while there is more hc in the last year or two of updates.
The vids max out at 640x480. Some sites having nothing but clips available. Some are about evenly split between full length and clips. Again, all is nonexclusive and average to good quality. About the only good thing is that most of the vids appear to be hardcore.
About half the sites cater to big boobs. Otherwise the models are all over the radar from pornstars to amateurs. The solo model pics tend to be more glam oriented harkening to the magazine theme at work here. There is no content from the mags though besides the pics.
The only reason I can score this in the 70's is because they have a mountain of content and because they still have acceptable pic and video sizes. Don't waste your money even on the trial. Save your pennies and pay a little extra to see the original stuff in mint condition at the sites that sell Swank their material.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ 3 day full access trial for $6 through TBP
+ Full access to 8 other sites (Swankpass network)
+ 960 photo shoots and 343 vids
+ Zip download available
+ No download limits or DRM
+ Smallish watermarks
Cons:
- Search function doesn't work & no model directory
- Pic sizes max out at 1020 x 680
- Vids max out at 640 x 480
- About 50% of vids downloadable in clips only
- Mostly nonexclusive contact
- Updates about once a week
Bottom Line:
For the price I figured this one was worth a trial. I figured it wouldn't be HotlegsandFeet but I was still hopeful of getting some decent leg shots. As they say "hope springs eternal" ... and this site is just another mediocre pit stop on that long eternal road.
Legaction started as a magazine (the other 8 network sites are also mag oriented). These sites never seem to have their act together enough put out a quality web based product and this one is no different.
Most of this stuff is nonexlusive as they farmed out a lot of the photography. For the hardcore stuff, most of this comes from Deny DiFranco (DDF) so if you've been to his sites recently skip this place. The rest of the hc is stuff you've probably already seen on other mega sites. The solo material has more stuff I haven't seen before but I can't vouch for exclusivity.
The girls here range from known pornstars to amateurs to milfs. The quality of the sets/scenes varies greatly from poor to good.
Pictures: As I said, pics max out at 1020 x 680. The photo archieves date back to 1997 but the sets prior to 2006 are crap. You get about 8 - 16 shots per set there (aka: worthless). The newer stuff spreads out to about 60 to 250 shots. Unfotunately, most of the good stuff (aka newer) is also the stuff you've probably seen already. The quality is average (nothing HQ about it). Most of the pics are solo with about 25% being HC and lez.
Video: There is only a couple years worth of video but only half have full length downloads available. The full downloads range from about 20 to 90 minutes. You can download in wmv, ipod or watch in flash. The older clip based stuff is strange in that you get 3 or 4 short clips with the last clip having most of the content and length. Again, you've probably seen a lot of this stuff from the DDF sites and other megasites. Quality is so-so; the full length clips at, say, 40 minutes long only come in at about 250 mb in file size. About half the vids are HC and the rest solo or lez.
The search function looks good but it doesn't work. You can only search under vids or pics and even then the layout is random, not by date. A lot of models, especially in the pics, have only a first name or no name at all or a "wrong" name so good luck there. There is a model directory.
As a bonus you get a slew of crappy 3rd party streaming feeds that I thought went extinct years ago (thus providing proof of "nonintelligent design" at this site): When's the last time you've seen a streaming vids options at 56k, 128k or 250k? The 8 other network sites are similar to here but have their own content and niches.
As another mild downer, when I ran my card the confirmation page didn't appear. Thus, I had to venture to my email to confirm everything.
Basically, for you leg lovers this site is more like a hamhock then a beautiful gam. The only reason this one scores in the 70's is because of the volume of content and network availability.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A good amount of photos with attractive russian girls (about 240 photo sets with about 25% being hardcore) (photo size is 1024 x 680) (about 70 to 120 pics per set)
- Good full access trial price. You get access to about 20 of their websites and dozens of standard 3rd party sites (see "bottom line" below for clarification on this)
- Access to over 240 sites with full monthly membership
Cons:
- No zips on photos
- Only about 40 vids (only a couple of them hardcore) with no dowload options (mpeg only); size is only 320x240 (aka don't join this site for the video content)
- Nonexclusive content
- Some advertising on the site
- No search function
- Have to re-enter username/password for each site
- No new updates, material is simply recycled
- 3rd part bonus links (HerfirstATM, Desperateteens, etc.) do not work and all contain nonexclusive material you've probably seen before
- Monthly membership of $40 way too expensive for what you get (in addition to the 20 or so main sites you get additional nonexclusive 3rd party bonus sets, upwards of 250)
- No response to site support inquiries
Bottom Line:
I posted a comment about this site a few months ago saying it was worth the trial (I was originally a member a few years ago). Having come back here on a trial all I can say now is "NYET"!
First, TBP is advertising a 3 day, $2 trial. When you go to the billing processor you find out the trial is 2 days for $4. You get access to some of their other sites but I kept random log in popups that kept freezing up my browser (not good).
This site has been around for years yet their oldest update dates to November '07. Bad sign. There was absolutely nothing new in hardcore since the last time I was there years ago. They just recycle their old content as "new updates". You get access to Tastethebabes which is a clone and most of the other exclusive sites are amateurish mature sites.
On the plus side, their stuff is nonexclusive but mostly shared among their sites and I have seen very little of it elsewhere. The girls are attractive russians so if you've not seen the stuff before and are willing to download each pic (no zips) then you might consider joining for the trial.
However, I can in no way justify joining this site for the monthly fee of $40. There are some sites exclusive to their network that have OK stuff but there's not enough quality and not enough quantity to justify the price. Even justifying the trial here is a stretch. Today's PU poll question asks if you've gotten sick of porn before. This site makes me have to answer "Yes".
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Access to 5 sites
- In expensive trial ($5)
- Some high quality vids and OK photos
- No DRM
- Exclusive content
Cons:
- Sites are poorly designed
- Sites stopped updating as of 1/08 with few updates prior to that
- Most sets are lower quality vids and pics
- No zip and only one photo size
- Many dead links
- Not a lot of content
- Admitted history of problems with sites by the webmaster
- Newer pics have large watermarks that sometimes obscure "the stuff"
Bottom Line:
This one was pretty much like a bad trip down memory lane. If you remember what porn sites looked like 10 years with broken links, one size fits all vids and photos and minimal web design then you have this site.
I took the trial primarily for povporn.com There were about 30 to 40 girls there. Of those, about 12 had better pics (1020 x 660) as well as good quality vids. The rest had 800 x 600 pics with low quality vids that have to be downloaded in segments. Two other sites only had about a dozen sets each. The main emphasis of the network is on Petersgirls which had the most content but was almost all softcore. By the time I got there, I was pretty much "done" with the whole thing and didn't look at much.
I got a good laugh at the Lapdancegonebad.com website. None of the photo links worked and there 8 videos. The main page had about 24 months of updates. There were no updates on any of the page. Instead there were some webmaster postings dating back to 2006 trying to calm customer complaints about bad links, slow updates, etc. His excuse then was bad support staff and people taking advantage of him. The next month, though, he was bragging about he was going to build a porn empire and turned down a $1 million offer for all his content. Apparently, he "relaunched" in the summer of 2007 but the same problems seem to have continued.
Basically, this network is a waste of time even for the trial offer. Let's just say I took one for the team here.
There is more than just the content for Tricky Masseur. Part of the issue I think is that I've been combing through the earliest posts on Wowgirls and I think they used a lot of the TeenMegaWorld content just to help this site get jump started. So, for the earliest 1/3 of the hardcore content, I'd say it's pretty much all from the TMW site. You could very well be right as to the overlap of the more recent content.
I happened to notice that the 18xgirls is now closed. I used to join that site a lot and I believe that content just got wrapped into Wowgirls which is why I seeing so much duplication compared to my collection.
I maybe off the reservation on this one but here goes: I didn't really any research on this site before joining and now I'm left wondering why this place is getting such high scores. Usually I associate high scores with exclusive content but I've been a member here for a few days and I can pretty much say that as far as the hardcore content goes that this place is basically taking sets directly from the Teenmegaworld network and/or 18xgirls site. There may be a few a sets that are exclusive but most of it looks like the same material. They do change the names on some of the models between the sites but … you get my drift. The quality of some of the photo sets may be better here than on TMW but the videos appear to be about the same quality as the other sites.
I don't really get into solo content any more so I can't say how much of this is duplicated or not. Anyone happen to know on this?
If the content really is mostly duplicated then I guess I'd have to say that you should save a few bucks on the membership price and just join TMW or 18xgirls since they're cheaper.
Thanks for the review on this. As a clarification have they eliminated all the photo sets or have they just stopped adding photo sets to the newer updates? I know they still did pic sets here a year or two back.
Have to say that I don't recall seeing an ad for foreign escort services appearing at PU before. Love the gutsy yet clueless ploy. However, just pointing out to admin that they need to delete this post and probably this site from PU / TBP.
Why does this webmaster still have an active account here. Offering free memberships is against site policy not to mention trollish behavior in general.
I said "weed" just because it's getting legalize everywhere. However, I'm sorta surprised there's never been a reality series take off where pornstars get put together and get voted off the island aka Survivor or Big Brother.
Sorry but I can't help you there. I've been a member several times over the last 5 or so years so I last downloaded any old content years ago and didn't even really look it this last go around. I'd suggest posting a comment on the "Brazzers" PU page asking your question, I'm sure you'd get a fairly quick reply.
I give you an "A" for effort on trying to show how you weighted your review but it is a bit hard to read at first (it took me a minute to see what you were trying to do).
I've occasionally thought that PU might want to develop a template to give reviewers the option of doing a "quick review" by just assigning a number to a few criteria without having to manually type out your thoughts. Something like that might be good for newbies who are intimidated by having to spell it all out.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
