Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Wittyguy (0)  

Feedback:   All (830)  |   Reviews (58)  |   Comments (90)  |   Replies (682)

Other:   Replies Received (431)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 838 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(0)

94.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Good deal at $15 a month for almost 40 sites counting the lesser quality bonus content.
+ 8500+ scenes of exclusive mostly Euro porn with daily updates.
+ Lots of hot models and a good variety of h/c, lez, solo and some tranny. Overall high production value and quality.
+ All scenes have both pics w/ zips and vids
+ Pics are large, going up to 7300x4900 in a few cases.
+ 5 vid download options and stream function.
+ Pretty decent navigation which is rare in my book.
+ Good download speeds (600 - 2,000 MB/sec across multiple channels was usual).
+ Bills through Epoch and no prechecked cross sales. Home page also displays how many days left on your subscription.
Cons: - Many of the sites are dead or only update sporadically leaving about 10 truly active sites.
- A fair amount of anal for those not so inclined.
- More material is being farmed out to secondary producers now and the quality takes a hit on these scenes.
- I had difficulty getting the stream video function to work well (I had to run the vid about 15 seconds, pause it and let it buffer for a bit before being able to jump forward/back).
- Limited model info and interaction. The Fanclub where models interacted is now dead.
- Pix and vid don't always include the same content and some of the sites were painfully predictable as to which hardcore positions would be featured, especially on the pics.
- Especially for pics, the camera work needs to improve (see below).
- Some cross selling, especially for other 21stsextury sites that share the same portal hub.
- File naming is poor (just a number).
Bottom Line: I found it hard to believe that it had been five years since I was last here but my hard drive coffers are now restocked and joy has spread across the land. I always liked this network, even when it was just stand alone sites way back when, and it finally hits the ceiling on my score list. Here be the nuts and bolts:

PICS: Starting in the second half of 2010, the pic sizes jump from 1200x800 to about 3700x5800 and some sets go even bigger. All scenes have zips and have between 100 and 300 pics. Due to some of the large pic sizes, you can get zips exceeding 1 gig in size so be prepared to self edit if you don't hoard disk space. Overall quality is generally quite good. The pics appear all on one page which is nice but when viewing inbrowser you can't enlarge a pic to it's full size.

My main beef with the pics (and this goes to other sites who have introduced large pic sizes) is that you can't rely on autofocus any more. Most of the pics are either screen grabs from the HD movie or separately shot using a narrow range or "dot" autofocus. This works for distance shots or when the body(s) are perpendicular to the camera. However, when the model angles away the result is that a good portion of the body gets slightly out of focus and is annoying. I tossed a lot of pics because of this. It gets really bad on Footsiebabes now and I had to chuck entire sets just because everything but the feet where out of focus. Clearly they have cut back on photography like a lot of othere sites but the over reliance on a narrow focal range gets noticeably bad when you jump to very large pic sizes.

Some of the super sized pics also look grainy at full size meaning they just used screen caps or blew up standard pics beyond their limits.

VIDS: Downloads available in 1080, 720, 540 and 2 phone sizes and most vids are 20-30 minutes long. 1080 starts appearing about 2 years ago. It's not super high end 1080 but it looks good. I downloaded a lot in 540 and it still looks good on my monitor. Other than an issue with the stream player, everything was cool with the vids.

NAVIGATION: Usually I rip sites on their navigation function but I don't have much bad to say here other than "it works pretty well". I never pay attention to search by tag because tagging is never consistent and on a site this size any search simply dumps 100's of scenes on you. Best way to go is by model (the directory seems complete) or by individual site or by network update date. The sites are listed on the side bar. You just click and go. Only real negative is that they need a better page jump system. With some sites topping 100 pages they only let you jump a couple of pages at a time. That's an unnecessary time killer.

OTHER: As noted above, some of the content is produced out of house. AnalTeenAngels and Gapeland use the same models and production as you get with Teenmegaworld. There are more scenes now with U.S. models which are also outsourced. The production value isn't as high with these sites and they get repetitious quick but it isn't terrible by any means. A few sites where also predictable in that you know exactly what every scene would look like in terms of positions.

The most active sites are ClubSandy (sadly, Sandy is not in front of the camera any more, she still looks great I think), Assholefever, Analteenangels, Cutiesgalore, Footsiebabes, Gapeland, Lezcuties, Picsandvideo, and DPFanatics. The other sites are dead or update less than once a month.

The stuff from early 2010 and before is lesser quality (1200x800 pics and 540 sized vids) but that's to be expected. The content is still good and I think looks almost better in terms of models and production value (not comparing to today's world) than some of the most recent stuff.

Despite my incessant bitching, which is common in my reviews, I admit to really liking this site. It has very good production values. Most scenes offer some story line (not a lot of gonzo) in different locations and usually start with the models clothed and then working down from there. You got a ton of variety in terms of content and a lot of different girls. Hell, I even grabbed some content from the "lesser" bonus sites which still had an acceptable level of content and I almost never do that. It has great looking content going back for over a decade and is a great value.

Thus, I plant my flagpole atop 21sextury and proclaim it "King" of my review hill. Not a bad way to finally crest the "100 points" on the review hill.

03-04-15  02:07pm

Replies (6)
Review
2
Visit Hands on Hardcore

Hands on Hardcore
(0)

93.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Professional photography
- Over 500 hardcore scenes (all have pics and vids)
- High rez downloads for newer postings (up to 1800 pixels at a rate over 1 meg per second) and no DRM
- High rez pics (up to 2000 pixels but most at 1600) with zip available
- Only hardcore sex divided into 7 categories
- Model index and generally good navigation
- Good customer support
Cons: - Some content recycled through other DDF sites
- Older content is only average quality (standard sized .wmv downloads available only in sections and pics only at 800 x 600)
- Pics come up in a separate window
- No bonus content
- Download speeds can vary
Bottom Line: I am a big fan of Deny DeFranco and his DDF sites (1ByDay, Hotlegsandfeet) but had never joined here mostly due to a high fee. I noticed that the site is now $30 month and tried it.

First, the site is what it says. No solo or lesbian sets, everything is m/f sex in 7 categories.

The professionalism is first rate. No out of focus pics or shakey videos. The models are almost all European.

The newer sets, about 1/3, have the high quality download options in several download formats (wmv, dvx). The oldest material, about 1/3 again, can only be dowloaded in sections and only display around 440 x 250. I noticed that download speeds varied depending on the time of day but speeds were generally good.

The pics are very good with most being at 1600 pixels with S, M, and L options available. Most sets have around 120 pics. The newest pics in their largest size also have the actual photographic data from the shoot stored in them if you're into that.

My only disappointment with the site was that a fair number of sets here also appear on other DDF sites. One of the recent updates (site updates about 2 - 3 times a week) was a set I've had for years. If you're already a frequent visitor to the other DDF sites you might want to consider if you want to join here.

This is a great site if you like nonreality based hardcore. The only thing that could really be better would be more frequent updates and more original content. Overall, well worth the money

05-01-08  11:46pm

Replies (3)
Review
3
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(0)

92.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + A boat load of scenes and models (about 4500 scenes)
+ About 8-10 updates per week across a 27 site network
+ Excellent navigation, can search by model, site or across the network
+ All scenes have pics up to 2500x1600 with zips and multiple video options with true 1080 HD on scenes added since late 2009
+ Model directory (with actual info!)
+ Good price at $20 a month (I got in on a special $10 price)
+ Pretty much all hardcore across a variety of genres from teen to milf
+ Excellent production values and usually an attempt to build some story line into the scenes
+ Lots of ability for users to interact on the site (ratings, forum, comments, etc)
+ Good download speeds for me - consistently in the 500 or more MB/sec range across multiple channels
Cons: - As usual the older content (before mid 2009) lacks in quality (no HD video and only 900x600 pics)
- Tags are inconsistent so not a reliable way to do a comprehensive search
- Only about 14 sites update.
- Their motto might as well be "Home of big tits and bit tatts". The majority of models would make silicon valley envious but there is something for about everyone here except softcore.
- Cross sale on signup and advertising on the site and when you log in
- A slew of "bonus sites" that are just tube quality streaming videos
- Too many pics. Many scenes have over 1000 images which just means endless pics of the same thing.
- Although not really a negative, most all the models here are certified porn stars so if you're looking for fresh meat, you won't find it here.
- Nothing terribly original about the scenes so it can seem a bit stale after a while even across the wide genres they cover
Bottom Line: It's been almost 5 years since I was last here and I mostly stayed away because of the low quality pics and "bit tit, big ass, bit tattoos" theme that most of the sites focus on. However, I decided to jump in on a $10 a month special through TBP and have to say I was pretty impressed. There's a reason why this in one of the biggest and most popular porn sites out there. Here's the quick low down:

PICS: Older pics (before mid 2009) are only 900 to 1000 by 660. Since then, the size is great and so is the quality. You don't get download options though. My only beef is that there are too many pics with some scenes having over 2500 pics. A few sites have done better keeping them around 200-300 but most updates still have around 800. I'm glad they don't give you too few pics but I really don't need 15 shots of the same thing. With the large pic sizes, some zip files end up being 600 - 800 mb in size which is just unnecessary.

VIDS: As noted, before 2009 the vid quality is average at best. Since then the HD stuff looks really good. You get up to 7 download options (full HD to mobile sized), in browser streaming which works great (very little lag time), screen caps and 1 or 5 minute screen caps which appear just below the video to let you jump to the good stuff. Download speeds were fast and consistent. Vids range from 20 to 50 minutes. I found that I downloaded a lot of "SD mp4" files (lower rez but formatted with HD dimensions) which look pretty good on my 23" monitor and saved on the 2-5 GB full HD size.

NAVIGATION: The more I review and look at porn sites the more I see sites that just grow too big for their original navigation systems and become, at best, a chore to slog through. Since my last join here years ago they have completely revamped their navigation and it freakin' actually works well. Only a few clicks will get you where you want. You can browse through a 1000 pics and with two back button clicks you're out to update page for any site. You can search in various ways except really the tags because they're inconsistent but then I've never seen a really good tag system on a large site.

You can create favorite lists, the sites track the scenes you've looked at that you can easily access and there's lots of opportunity to give feedback and interact if you're into that. The model directory has actual info and lets you follow porn stars.

OVERALL: I'm not really into the big tit slutty porn star thing but I found that I downloaded about 500 photo sets and about 80 vids so I can't say I was disappointed. You got teens, milfs, uniforms, bit butts, big tits, squirting, etc. to choose from so unless you're into softcore or lez you should be able find a few goodies.

Production values since 2009 are great and you get a ton of models.

My negative impressions are mostly minor. A few broking links, the site bogged down my Firefox browser after 2 hours (probably need more ram), and even with all the sites and models the porn does get a little repetitive but then again this is a pretty mainstream porn network.

While I'm not ready to sell out and go sign myself up for life to the silicon boob of the day club I was pretty impressed with the site. If I were to score it just on content and production value it'd only be in the mid 80's but the well thought out navigation and ease of use are some of the best I've seen which bumps up the score to 92. At last, a pleasant surprise.

11-27-13  08:32pm

Replies (1)
Rating
4
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(0)

92.0
No Review.
04-25-08  02:49pm

Review
5
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(0)

91.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Sweet TBP/PU rate of $20 to join, eventually dropping to $10 month for ongoing membership
+ Thousands (maybe even 10k) of scenes
+ 25 sites network initially, expands to about 41 after a month
+ Good navigation and the search engine looks amazing and goes across the whole network
+ No DRM and no DL limits
+ Newest vids on the flagship sites (PixandVideo, Club Sandy, etc.) go up to 1900x1080
+ All pic sets have zips
+ Professional effects, lighting and photography on the flagship sites
+ Clearly marked updates
+ No cross sales or advertising
+ Lots of hot euro babes
+ Wide variety of content with multiple daily updates across the network
+ Archive going back to 2003 on the oldest sites; all exclusive content on the flagship sites
Cons: - For the first month, only SweetSophieMoone, AssholeFever, PixandVideo, ClubSandy, LezCuties, FootsieBabes and BlueAngelLive have anything great to offer. (I refer to these below as the Flagship Sites)
- Scenes aren't tagged real well so the awesome looking search engine can leave stuff out.
- Broken links on some photos and preview thumbs (click the "x", it's probably there) and I got a few bad video downloads.
- DL speeds not so hot (mostly 120 to 500 kps, the more channels I have going the faster it seems to go for me).
- Pic sizes are obsolete for the level of quality they otherwise offer.
- Zips and movie files are not labeled well.
Bottom Line: I used to love the individual sites but rarely joined in the past because of price. With the sweet PU/TBP deal, I couldn't resist and will probably stay a member for many months, damn near a first for me. Here's the low down:

PICS: All scenes have zip but all pic sizes are limited to 1280x850. WTF? The flagship sites here scream quality but they're still launching 20th century quality with their pic sizes. Most scenes have 100 to 160 pics. Also, when viewing pics individually the horizontal slide bar doesn't automatically appear on landscape shots (again, why?). Once you get past the Flagships, the pics are few and far between but there is plenty to keep you going with the big 6 sites.

VIDS: Awesome size on the newest vids. Most of the stuff within the last few years maxes out at 1280. The oldest content and a lot of the content outside the flagship sites peaks at 640 or even 460. You do get 10 screen caps minimum to see what you're getting. You can DL full scenes or scenes. In browser stream is an option and works well. On the most recent content, you usually have 3 download options, only 1 or 2 on the older. Full scene file sizes range from about 40 mb (low quality) to 2 gigs (best quality). DL speed is an issue as I noted above.

SEARCH: There is a 25 filter search system which looks awesome. As noted, the problem lies in the lack of adequate tags. Thus, the system sort of defeats itself and you're better off just going through the sites you like one by one. There is a central model directory which appears complete but no model bio's are given.

As for "the rest": Some sites have lots of dead links for pics and the like. Just click them, they usually bring something up but it's annoying and a pretty basic problem to overcome. If you liked the old calendar version of the site, the new set up takes a little getting used to. However, after a few days I found it much easier to use, especially on a network this size and found they had lots of options for customizing. It didn't take more than a few clicks to go and get what I wanted.

A big issue for me is why are they adding all this content beyond the flagship sites for the first month. It's obviously 3rd party produced and the models and production values just aren't up to 21stSextury snuff. Apparently they feel the need to keep up with Brazzers or NewSensations and add a bunch of sites to pump up the numbers and add "new" sites with overlapping content. My advice is to keep your standards up and focus on the good sites you already had. I'll take quality over quantity ... especially if you boost your pic sizes.

Lastly, despite the many negatives I pointed out, I'm still scoring this one a "91" simply because of the volume of content on even just the flagship sites, the hot babes and hot videos. With more sites coming to me soon, it can only get better. Well worth a join even if it leaves this picture fan a bit miffed.

02-24-10  07:17pm

Replies (12)
Review
6
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)

91.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Excellent photography with photos in sizes going up to approx. 4000 x 3000 pixels.
- Newer vids go up 1280 x 720 pixels with good download speeds (older vids are 512 x 330)
- 1000+ very attractive models, many with multiple sets
- Multiple daily updates
- No DRM
Cons: - No model info
- Vids aren't as good as the photo sets
- Site gets a little dull and repetitive
- No hardcore or toys or penetration, a few very mild lesbian scenes
- Photo quality can vary a little with some of the larger photos being somewhat grainy
Bottom Line: As a photo lover I would have to rank Metart as the best solo model / softcore photo sites out there. The photos get insanely large (4000+ pixels - practically life size if you got a monitor that big) and the photography is mostly excellent. With multiple daily updates and over half a million pics no one can complain about a lack of quantity or quality for the most part.

I would have to say that the vids lag behind the photos and that the vids mostly parallel the photo sets in terms of content. Like other PU reviewers have noted, they need to expend a little more effort to boost their video quality.

As with Hegreart, the focus here is mostly on european girls and for some reason they can sometimes come across as a little "cold" although this isn't a major problem. I did find the site a bit repetitive given that the content is very softcore.

Overall, I would join primarily for the pics at this point although the newer vids are quite good in their quality. If the site got a little "edgier" with some toys or lesbian sets I would jump my score to about a 95. As is, I got a little too bored with the vast amounts of material so, for me, a 91 seems appropriate.

05-29-08  06:09pm

Replies (2)
Review
7
Visit Suze Randall

Suze Randall
(0)

91.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Suze is a legend
- Huge Photo Archieve
- Multiple Download Options
- Model Search & Index
- Good Customer Service
- Hot babes if glamor and/or fetish is your thing
- Sweet $4.77 full trial
Cons: - Some photo sets are limited (not showing full suite of photos)
- Some "pseudo porn" on the old sets
- You have to hunt for the trial offers
- Possibly some set rotation but does not appear to happen often
- No videos (based solely on the trial offer I signed up for)
Bottom Line: (Note: This is a review for Suze.net only, it does not cover suzevideo.net)

If you love huge quantities of quality photos of hot girls then this is the place for you. If you're not familiar with Suze think of Penthouse and Hustler as the standard I'm talking about.

I was at Suze.net a few months ago and just came back and what a difference. You now get 10 years of photos which means 500+ boy/girl sets, 300+ girl/girl sets, 1600+ centerfolds and hundreds of additional sets. The sets allow zip and download options of 800, 1024 and 1400 pixels. The sets prior to '03 generally lack the 1400 option. The sets generally had 50 - 100 pics each with older ones usually having less than 50.

A lot of this stuff I hadn't seen since the days when a 56k connection was high speed, Jill Kelly ruled and white guys with names like "Dale DaBoner" swung their stuff. Depsite the fact that many of the sets were older they didn't seem too dated given the glamor/fetish emphasis of the site.

My only dislikes were that the older sets had a lot of psuedo (aka nonpenetration porn) and that Suze keeps shifting her trial offers. I'm a cheap bastard and I eventually found a tgp link that got me into the $4.77 full trial as advertised by TBP. Otherwise, it's hit or miss on the posted trial amounts if you go to the site. Also, a few sets I had seen before lacked all the images available.

With a full trial of less than $10 you simply can't go wrong. Basically, this site rocks.

03-31-08  02:27pm

Replies (0)
Review
8
Visit Hands on Hardcore

Hands on Hardcore
(0)

89.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Prior members look for occasional $10 a month memberships in your in box (otherwise $20 a month)
+ Access to the DDF Network of sites
+ Over 1000 scenes of mostly exclusive eurobabe hardcore action with updates roughly every 2 days.
+ Bills through Epoch
+ Very good download speeds (consistent 2mb/sec for me)
+ Excellent navigation
+ The last few years have 1920 x 1080 resolution vids. All scenes have zips but only in the max picture size.
+ Good model directory that seems complete and shows the tags associated with that model.
+ Pics come mostly come in 2000x1300 rez.
+ Professional high end production value.
Cons: - About 20% of recent updates is "guest content" that only allows you to stream a video supplied by another site.
- Some older vids (I'm talking 7-10 years ago) don't have working streams even though it's indicated as available.
- Some content recycling (about 3-4 times a year).
- Some "Hidden" content that you can only find via the model directory (my guess is that it's waiting to be recycled).
- Searching via tags is, as usual, not really worth your time on a site this size.
- Quality still very good compared to other sites bit appears to be slipping a bit.
Bottom Line: I was going to do a review on the whole DDF Network but exoticsforme just did a very complete review so I'll just focus on this site as it's the main reason I keep coming back to the network.

As you'd expect, DDF puts out high quality product and this site is no exception. Here's a quick run down:

PICS: All scenes have pics and zips but zips only come in one size (max rez). The oldest stuff is not worth it at roughly 500x800 rez but most everything the last 10+ years is 2000x1300 or 1600x1000 (for the older stuff). They've cut back a bit on pic count recently - usually topping out at about 100 while a few years ago they'd push about 150. My only minor beef with the most recent pics is "photo density": meaning you get a decent sized downloaded pic but the file size isn't that large. This is fine for monitor viewing like I do but for those who watch on their big screen tv's the lack of pixels will become apparent.

VIDS: The new stuff is very good at a very high bit rate (see the TBP review for more specs) and definitely HD but does not truly qualify as 4k. Download speeds are very good. Recent vids have 4 download options plus stream. For the last 2 years or so the stream function also has tags that let you jump to specific action in the vid with pushing the bar which is nice. With the exception of some pretty old vids the stream function worked well. The oldest content here lacks vids (yep, back in the day when pics were all you got - tells you how far back they go here).

NAV: Some of the best navigation I've seen in a while. You can select a site and search by update, year/month, or by tags. You get 20 scenes per page and you can page jump easily. Click on scene and the vid is on top. Scroll down and you get the first page of pics (you can easily go forward back on the pic pages without reloading the whole page). It saves you a lot of clicking and opening scenes in separate windows which is a nice change.

Overall, you really can't go wrong here if you're into hardcore. The only real downer is the more frequent use of stream only guest content and the occasional recycled scene. The last few years feature a fair amount of anal content if you're into that. I've noticed that they've expanded their stable of photographers (aka - "outsourced") which leads to some variation of scene quality.

Otherwise it's a good mix of b/g and multiple partner eurobabe porn (yes, the vids are in English although it's struggle for some actors). Not too many tatoos and not too many fake breasts which is a nice break too. On it's own I give this site an 89 but when you add in the network with multiple daily updates of high quality nastiness you're easily into a score of 90+.

01-13-16  06:24pm

Replies (1)
Review
9
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(0)

88.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + 8,000 exclusive porn scenes with updates 2x per day across 33 sites (only 17 currently update).
+ A wide variety of porn from teens to milfs, almost all hardcore, featuring most every US porn star you know.
+ 1080 sized vids going back to 2010.
+ Decent navigation though the site is a bit plain by today's standards.
+ In browser video streams are fast and smooth and the scenes have tags where you can jump to the type of action you want.
+ Good sized pics (2500x1660) going back to 2009 and a lot of them (about 500 per scene). All pic sets have zips.
+ Most scenes supply some sort of story line as opposed to the usual gonzo offerings of most sites.
+ Discounts through TBP (I got a $10 per month holiday deal).
+ No DRM or download limits.
+ Professional production standards for most all scenes.
Cons: - Prechecked cross sale on signup that's not entirely obvious (look at the top of signup page in a separately colored box).
- Uses Probiller for billing which isn't great on support.
- Lots of ads throughout the site.
- Slow downloads at times (don't use Firefox on this site).
- Lots of tats, botox and cosmetic surgery on the talent.
- A lot of overlap on the sites, no real distinction between most of them.
- Pics are basically HD screen shots from the videos so the quality is sometimes iffy.
Bottom Line: As most everyone knows, Brazzers is a classic hardcore mega porn site that offers something for most everyone at a decent price. The emphasis here leans more towards well known porn stars with big boobs and milfs doing straight sex, anal and most every other position. Not a lot of lesbian, group sex or DP scenes if that's your thing. It's basically your local diner that will fill you up but won't “wow” you. Here's the lowdown:

PICS: All scenes have pics with zips with 2500z1660 sizes going back almost a decade. Pre-2009 sizes drop to 900x600. The in browser viewer for pics is antiquated (can only view pics at 800x530 resolution). You get a ton of pics per scene (usually 500+) which can really means a lot of shots of the same thing. The good thing about all these pics is that if you like softcore photos about one half of the pics per set are the “before” pose shots where the girls start fully dressed and then strip down to nothing so you can build you own softcore galleries if you want. The action pics are screen grabs which are usually good quality but some scenes are way too dependent on a macro / fisheye lens setting which warps all but the center of the image and bad cropping (scenes where the models have no arms / legs). As usual, the videos typically show more action content than the pics.

VIDS: I liked the in browser options for vids. You can play them at various speeds (.5 to 2x) and numerous resolution (phone to 1080). For the last several years, each scene has jump tags where you can click on the type of action you want to see and the video will jump to that part. Streams were fast and smooth. I had pretty good download speeds for me (1-3 mb/sec) but this varied on time of day; during evening “prime time” things really got slow to the point I gave up a few times. MP4 is the main video download format and they look good. I downloaded a lot in 480 resolution to save space and they look fine on my 22” monitor.

NAV: Navigation on a site this big works best if you go site by site as opposed the ginormous main update page where pagination becomes an issue. The individual sites look outdated but at least most everything works. There is a model directory which seems complete. You can also tag scenes, save favorite scenes, leave comments and rate scenes. They have a search function based on general categories or tags which seems more inclusive than most sites but still isn't close to complete.

I will note that I like Firefox but even with the most up to date version getting pages to load was terribly slow at any time of day. I resorted to Chrome which worked a lot faster here.

Probiller is not my favorite processor. You can only cancel via phone or email so plan on canceling at least a few days in advance. Customer service is a bit spotty too.

There is a certain lack of male talent here. There are only a handful of guys that appear in most scenes so if one or more of them turn you off then there's a lot you may not like.

Personally I'm not into the whole big butt / big breast thing (hell, I even saw butt implants here) “but” (pun intended) there is something for most everyone who likes hardcore. I like that they at least put a story line on almost all the scenes, not as well as other sites but it's an improvement over straight gonzo. The overall scene and production quality is not top end but it's better than average which pretty much sums up the site as a whole.

02-01-18  12:15pm

Replies (2)
Review
10
Visit Nubiles Porn

Nubiles Porn
(0)

88.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + 750 hardcore scenes of attractive nubile aged porn featuring a good mix of Euro and American girls (what's not to like). Also a good mix of pornstars and relative unknowns. Mostly b/g content with some lesbian and 3 some. Limited anal / fetish content.
+ All scenes have pics with zips and at least 720 HD video (Half the scenes have 1080 sized vids).
+ Almost all exclusive content.
+ Numerous download options for vids and numerous playback options for streaming. The site also remembers your stream preferences.
+ Good D/L speeds for me; about 1.5 - 2 mb/sec.
+ Some interesting niche sites like Petiteballerinas and several milf + younger girl on boy sites.
+ Bills through CCBill.
+ Mostly professional production level porn with good lighting.
Cons: - Streaming playback was choppy for me at HD levels, had to resort 640x340 size for smooth playback.
- Only updates about once every 3 days.
- Limited model info.
- Tags and categories are bit too limited for a site this sized.
- There was a stretch of a few years where most of the models and scenes were basically teeenmegaworld / 3xgirls content (not exactly duplicates but the same models and style of shooting).
- Could use more dual camera work and some of the scenes do lack a bit of passion (just going through the motions). Limited story lines / plot if any.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup page and you can't chose your own password and username.
- Model names for the Euro girls, especially on older updates, is sketchy. File naming on downloads is also poor (no names, just numbers or scene names).
Bottom Line: In a nutshell, this is the hardcore version of nubiles.net. Pretty much all the content on nubiles will be found here minus the softcore / solo stuff. Thus, what you get is banging hot young bods in banging action. Exoticsforme did a good review recently so I'm not adding a lot here other than to mostly echo what he said. Here's the skinny:

PICS: All scenes have zip downloads available. About half the scenes have 2400x1600 sized pics while the newest half (late 2013 onward) go up 5760x3480. As with most sites, there is usually less going on in the pics here than with the vids. As usual, most pics are just HD video screen grabs but overall they look pretty good with limited pixelation. Most scenes also have screenshots to view. In browser viewing is at the 2400x1600 level.

VIDS: Starting in late 2013, you get 6 download options (1080 down to 480). The other half (2013 and earlier) at least have 720 vids. Good production qualities overall with good download speeds. In-browser playback a bit choppy at HD levels for me. Limited dialogue and plot lines in the vids. Most vids 20-30 minutes long. The 1080 sized vid files can get overly large (3-4 gigs).

NAV: In a word, "meh". The easiest way to download (short of DL manager) is to just go through all 50 pages of the nubiles-porn site. All updates are listed on there. As a short cut, note the scene number you left off at and hand type it in when you next log in to continue. The tags and categories are too general to be of much use. There is "public tags" section here which is new to me but is worthless are it's mostly douche bags saying "hot girl needs anal". The model directory seems complete but has almost zero info on the girls.

OVERALL: Despite my usual gripes about sites this ain't bad. I pretty much go what I expected at a decent level of quality without too much hassle.

Do note the following: Most of the updates come in two sites: PetiteHD and Nubiles-porn. The other sites update just once a month. DriverXXX no longer updates and was stupid anyway with poor quality (the driver / male has his face digitized out in the vids but not the photos, give me a break).

A lot of the Euro girls are shot by the same guys who bring you Teenmegaworld / 3xGirls so if you don't like their stuff be warned. I did come across a couple of scenes though that already occupy my hard drive.

Most of the scenes are farmed out so quality can sometimes be a bit iffy (Teacherfucksteens has really poor sound quality).

Most of the scenes are shot using a single camera and single mic which is usually static and can be a bit dull after a while. There is some POV style shooting in the scenes for those interested in that.

If you're wondering if you should join here or nubiles.net, it doesn't matter. You have access to all the sites through here and price is the same. If you got time, browse the nonhardcore babes too as there's a ton of them (multiple daily updates).

Overall, this is a good quality hardcore teen oriented site. The action can be a bit repetitive or uninspiring but no real complaints. Gotta like that in my book.

07-06-16  07:35pm

Replies (4)
Review
11
Visit X Empire

X Empire
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Currently $15 a month through TBP.
+ Access to HardX, DarkX, LesbianX and EroticaX sites (785 vids and 1525 pic sets across all the sites).
+ Attractive, mostly American pornstarlets (teens to 20's mostly).
+ A variety of sex and setups. You probably won't get too bored.
+ Professional staging and production values.
+ 7 video download options – from 1080 down to 160 (no 4k).
+ All pics 1920x1280 at 96 dpi.
+ Good download speeds for me (3-5 mb/sec). No download limits.
+ Good looking sleek site design.
+ Model directory appears complete.
+ Options for leaving comments and rating scenes.
+ Exclusive content with daily updates.
Cons: - Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- Uses a credit card processor my card company didn't like.
- Photo sets and videos are found in separate categories and most don't cross link. Photo set file names are just numbers.
- Until about May of 2017, photo sets were split into 2 separate updates: Glam shots and the Sex scene.
- Basically no model information.
- A fair amount of tatoos but not too bad on the amount of implants.
- Not all scenes have pics and vids.
- Navigation needs some work.
Bottom Line: I'd been thinking about joining one of these sites recently so when I saw that they had finally put all of them under one roof for $15 a month I jumped on it. As stated, you get access to all four of the “X” sites. For those not in the know, here's a brief autopsy on what each site gives you:

DarkX: 198 pic sets, 102 vids. All hardcore site featuring mostly white girls with the usual overhung black talent. A lot of anal and some dp here. For whatever reason, the girls featured here tend to be a bit curvier than the other sites (most models appear on most of these sites).

HardX: 880 pic sets, 450 vids. All hardcore with a mix of everything going on. Probably a bit more hardcore than a run of the mill hardcore site but not much extreme. Again, a fair amount of anal. Also, a fair number of BTS vids.

EroticaX: 406 pic sets, 210 vids. All hardcore with the “heartcore” or couples vibe going on. I liked in that the couples seem to put more effort into the scenes here than most heartcore sites. Very little anal and no dp action.

LesbianX: 40 pic sets, 22 vids. Self explanatory.

PICS: All photo's come in at 1920x1280 (or vice-a-versa for portrait) at 96 dpi and all photo sets have zips although the zip file names are just a number. The photo's are almost all shot very well with limited pixelation and generally good focus. When viewing in browser I wish they would put all the pics on a single page, some sets can have 15 pages of pics. Until you get to late 2015 / early 2016 the number of photos tend to be skimpy (20-40 usually). After that the pic count jumps up to about 100-200 per set or more. I wish they would have had more full body shots on the sex scenes than they did. As usual, the videos have more content than the pics but not by much.

My biggest beef with the pics is that until a few months ago the “Glam” shots are separate from the sex scenes which is unnecessary in my book. Also, the photo sets are separated from the videos and most sets are not cross linked so you have to search through the pics separately. Lastly, the photo sets are not date stamped but the videos are – I'm guessing this is a “new site” snafu.

VIDS: I had very good download speeds for me. I liked the 7 download options (1080 down to 160). I found myself downloading a lot of 540p vids which look just as good as most 720p vids you see on other sites. The vids are all well shot and lit with high production values. They do have good file names for the downloads on the vids. You can watch the vids in browser (7 stream rate options) which is fast and pretty smooth with minimal buffer time when jumping around. There is preview popup icon on the the time bar when streaming which worked pretty well for all but the oldest vids.

NAV: The site looks good and has a sleek feel. You can view content by each site or overall (all pics or all vids) but you do run into some pagination issues on the latter. You can also watch dvd's although all it does is show which scenes are in a particular dvd. There are tags on the scenes but as usual I found them to be too generic to do a meaningful search. There is no model info but there is room for rating scenes and leaving comments. The biggest bugaboo here is the separate photo and video sections. I found it easiest to look things through going site by site.

This site bills through chargepay.net and is supported by something called openlife. Right after I joined I got a fraud alert text from my credit card company which I had to clear so that wasn't cool but I had no other issues joining (still have yet to cancel).

Overall, I was impressed with the site. While most of the girls are known commodities there is lots of stuff to see and almost all of it is well shot. As a picture lover, I wasn't thrilled with some of the picture issues but it certainly wasn't a deal breaker. At the current price, which I suspect won't last long, it's definitely on the must see list for most hardcore fans.

08-17-17  01:29pm

Replies (0)
Review
12
Visit Hands on Hardcore

Hands on Hardcore
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Almost 800 scenes of nothin' but hardcore banging.
+ Exclusive content.
+ About 100 true HD scenes and large sized vids in general.
+ Professional quality production and lighting.
+ Good full trial price of $3.50 for 2 days (see review below for tips on saving $$ for more time).
+ Good DL speeds, various format options for vids and streaming in browser.
+ High quality pics, all with zips.
+ Good model directory and generally good search.
+ All updates are date stamped for future reference.
+ Multiple language options and a mobile viewing option as well.
Cons: - Not all HD labelled vids are HD.
- Search options for pics are worthless.
- Content gets a bit repetitive.
- Currently updating 2x per week but starting in 2012 and going back expect only 1 update per week at best.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- Some content seen on other sites and some photographers work isn't up to snuff for DDF work.
- As usual, oldest content isn't that high quality.
- Some content recycled from other DDF sites and the date of publication here may not be when it first came out.
- Need more screen cap previews for the vids.
- Since I last joined they've removed some of the earliest content. Granted the quality wasn't the best but still not bad compared to some other major sites today. Wished they had kept it or remastered it.
Bottom Line: I last joined HoH about 4 years ago. I signed up for the 2 day trial expecting only to be able to grab a year or two worth of material. To my surprise I was done downloading in about 6 hours and I don't use a DL manager or have super fast high speed connections. The lack of updates over the years was about the major downer though. Here's the skinny:

PICS: All scenes have zip downloads and the last few years have pics coming in at 2000 x 1300 pixels. Even the oldest content is roughly 1600 x 1070 in size. The tags for photo search are worthless if there even are any. You can tag individual photos with info for others to see (don't know why you'd do this). No real ability to slideshow the pics. Multiple size options available. Some airbrushing on sets.

VIDS: All scenes have vids with the most recent allowing for wmv and mp4 download options. Some older vids also have divx or quicktime. All but the oldest material has streaming video with ability to jump around to get a good preview. I had consistent DL speeds of about 1.3 MB/sec on multiple channels. At best only about 80-100 vids are in true HD, most HD labelled vids are just HD size. Starting in 2008, the vid sizes get down to medium size (720x400) and the oldest years don't even get that big and come split into the scenes. I wish they had more screen caps in order to preview the vids without having to stream and jump around to decide if I wanted to DL or not.

The site allows you to search by category, date or tags. The model directory is good and has background info. There is some blog material and social media stuff but no one appears to do much with it. They also let you customize the site with favorites and similar items if you stick around for the long haul. There are some special discounts for other DDF sites and independent sites that pretty much match what you can find on TBP. However, if you want to join other DDF sites or the DDF network they do offer a 50% off the first month discount. So, my advice is join on a cheap trial and if you want more hit the discounts page, a better deal than what TBP has going.

Generally speaking, DDF puts out a consistent and high grade euro porn product. This site is no different but, if you've seen their sites before, you pretty much know what you're going to get. In that respect, there isn't a lot of imagination that goes into putting the scenes together and so some of the content does get repetitive. Overall, if they hadn't been skimpy with their updates the last 3 years or so I would have scored this in the 90's. So, if you like hardcore of all varieties you can't really go wrong here.

04-07-13  08:33pm

Replies (1)
Review
13
Visit Hot Legs and Feet

Hot Legs and Feet
(0)

87.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +++ 10 years of content online
++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff
++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video
+ Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids
+ Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality
+ Updates 2 - 3 times a week
+ Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs)
+ 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP
+ Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually)
+ Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it).
+ Overall good quality production and lighting
+ Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either)
Cons: -- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07
-- Navigation and website need a big overhaul
-- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them.
- Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection)
- Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue)
- Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes
- No search function and no scene tags
- Only a few screen caps (get more)
- Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available
- Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus.
- No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email).
Bottom Line: When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown:

PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big.

VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good.

OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse.

The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this).

If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing.

I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site.

01-26-11  02:26pm

Replies (2)
Review
14
Visit Asshole Fever

Asshole Fever
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Currently 305 scenes available, all with pics and vid
+ Newest max vid sizes are 1900x1080 with most maxing out at 1280 (smaller for the oldest stuff)
+ No DL limits and Downloadthemall DL manager works
+ Awesome $20 initial join fee (dropping down to $10 after 2 months) through TBP.
+ Access to 25 other sites including ClubSandy and PixandVideo right away.
+ Excellent search engine with 25 filter categories.
+ Model directory spans the whole network
+ Exclusive content with no apparent recycling
+ Loads of hot euro babes taking it where the sun don't shine (all HC content).
+ Professional photography and video with very good lighting.
+ Wide variety of content (MF, DP, Indoor/Outdoor, etc.)
+ Average sized watermarks in cornor
Cons: - Only 1 update per week
- Pic sizes are too small given the overall quality of this site.
- Some problems with downloads not coming through.
- Some problems viewing pics in the browser
- New site design is fine but navigation could be a bit better
- Logging in is a major eye strain (their teeny sized authorization letters you have to copy are almost impossible to read)
- Some of the action gets a bit rough and/or mechanical
- Some nonworking links (not many though and mostly individual pictures)
Bottom Line: If you can't even handle watching your dog/cat lick it's butt, then this site is probably not for you. It's all hot looking euro babes taking like champions where the sun don't shine. Here's the "scoop" (not to be confused with scooping your animals poop):

PICS: All pic sets have accompanying video (and seem to match the video in terms of content) and all sets have zip. Excellent quality with only a little air brushing from what I can tell. Bad news, pic sizes are only 1280x850. On average, you get between 100 and 180 pics per set with most pics being 250-300kb in size. Why do sites always seem to do this; getting hung up on video while neglecting their photos standards? These sizes don't cut it any more. Also, when viewing photos individually in the browser, I found that the landscape shots get cut off with a monitor setting of 1080x720. They have an up/down slider bar for portrait pics but no right/left slider bar for landscape. WTF?

VIDS: As noted elsewhere, newest max size vid downloads come in at 1900x1080 with most on this site being 1280 by 850. You can stream in browser at L, M and H and download in L, M and H in either .wmv or mp4 settings. File sizes on full length vids vary from about 2 gigs on the newest and largest to about 40 MB on the smallest. Each scene has 10 scene screen caps with scene and full scene download/stream options. Almost no music in vids and I haven't found any scenes yet with direction cues being shouted out. I did have a few problems with some vids just not downloading correctly and having to redo them.

They have redone their navigation on 21sextury so now after you log in you get a page that looks like a blog almost. It's easy to jump around but it takes a few clicks to get to what you want if just trying to find, say, all of the scenes in a single site. Once you get used to that, their filter system on the search engine is one of the best I've seen but the scenes aren't tagged very well so relying solely on the search functions will leave out some of the goodies that should be included.

Unfortunately, the action sometime gets a bit over the top with chicks just being pounded up the poop shoot because the shot calls for it. While these hot euro babes take it well, there's still a difference between just taking it and actual acting (same with the guys too). The overriding theme here is the anal action doesn't seem very spontaneous or a taboo thrill. The action can still be hot but it's just not all I hoped it would be.

I'm scoring this site an 87 on it's own. I'll be working a review on the whole 21sextury.com site soon, probably scoring the network in the low 90's. If you like butt sex, this is one of the best sites I've seen out there. Considering the network you get and the great price (after the second month you only pay $10 a month for a recurring membership) you simply can't go wrong in my butt ... er, I mean book.

02-17-10  03:46pm

Replies (7)
Review
15
Visit Blacked.com

Blacked.com
(0)

86.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + 345 scenes of exclusive interracial porn
+ All scenes have vids in 1080 HD and pic zips
+ Good download speeds for me (5mb/sec)
+ Good selection of video download options
+ Pic sizes are 2000x3000 pixels
+ Top end production values
+ Mostly top female talent and the focus in on the women
+ Grabbed this membership on a $10 per month TBP holiday special
+ No download limits that I could tell
Cons: - Only updates 1x per week
- Canceling membership is a pain in the butt
- Prechecked cross sale on signup
- Site doesn't play well with Firefox browser
- No model information
- Tags are pretty generic and don't allow for much of a search
- Site would be better with a network
- Scenes are repetitive in how they're shot and edited
- Fewer photos in the more recent photo sets
- Pagination issues (manually type in page you want to jump to)
Bottom Line: I took a stab at this interracial site based on the holiday price that was offered a while back. While I can't say I was disappointed I can't say that I was blown away either.

The production values are top end with great lighting and video. I was glad to see that unlike other interracial sites that have a lot of talking during the scenes by the male talent this one is more subdued, focusing on the white lonely housewife or the come of age girl wanting to explore the black side. Most of the talent here is A and B list variety and surprisingly doesn't feature a ton of tattoos on the women (the dudes are another story). Most of the women are generally in the 18-25 range and quite attractive without too much enhancement.

There is some anal and a few DP scenes but it's mostly straight M/F sex with more of an emphasis on the girls enjoyment (I'd call this midcore porn as opposed to the heartcore or really hardcore stuff). So you don't get the relentless pounding or the screaming and/or dirty talk all the time which is good.

The main problem is that the scenes get repetitive real quick. The same general scene set up with the same positions and camera angles. Pretty much every scene is shot in a high end bedroom. The scene build ups are pretty short too, not gonzo but not far off either. While there is a lot of good quality stuff it sort of wears on you after a while.

Here's some more technical info:

PICS: All scenes have pics with zips and all photos are 2000x3000. The production value is top end. Very little stripping or scene build up in the pics, usually a few pose shots then it's straight into the action. The earlier photo sets generally have a few hundred pics while the newest material only has around a hundred pics. As is usual, there is generally more action / positions shown in the video than on the pics. You can also view the pics in browser and can explode them up to full size.

VIDS: The got all the bases covered here, you can download from 4k on most pics all the way down to 270 for watching on your phone with about 6 total size options. All of the sizes looked good on my screen and had good stream rates. While I almost never watch porn on my phone I did view a few vids this time and found it streamed really well and I had no navigation issues at all. The in-browser stream function worked really well with limited buffering. The vids from the last few years also have jump indicators on the time bar where you can jump to specific types of action. Download speeds were good for me at around 5mb/sec on a consistent basis.

NAVIGATION & SITE FEEL: I had problems getting scenes to download using Mozilla. I switched to Chrome and had no problems afterward.

There is a model directory but pretty much zero model info. Most of the talent here is A and B list variety and surprisingly doesn't feature a ton of tattoos on the women (the dudes are another story). Most of the women are generally in the 18-25 range and quite attractive without too much enhancement.

Pagination is an issue here as is the search function because of limited tagging.

There is some advertising on every page and an annoying “Notification†icon which merely tells you that they have a new update and can't seemed to be cleared or turned off.

You get standard prechecked cross sale on signup. The biller here is Rocketgate which I don't recall using before. My main beef with them is that you have to email, live chat, or telephone to cancel your membership. I tried canceling by email several times to no response and no success and then spent 15 minutes on live chat to accomplish the deed.

Overall, I have to say it was a pretty good site. It would be a lot better if the operators combined some or all of their sites into a network (they also run Blackedraw, Tushy and a few others). While the production value is great it just sort of left me feeling a bit ho-hum at the end of the day because of the repetitive nature of the scenes and probably because I like my sites a tad more hardcore than what they do. I echo what Exotics4me said in his review in that those who are newer to porn will probably really like this site given the production while those who know what appeals to them may be left wanting a bit. Still, it is on of the top interracial sites in my book and would recommend taking it for a spin for a month or so.

02-21-19  05:51pm

Replies (3)
Review
16
Visit My XXX Pass

My XXX Pass
(0)

86.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Awesome $1, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ 13 network site
+ Good size pics (1000x1500 and larger) with zips and smallish watermark
+ Mostly exclusive content
+ Good mix of Euro and American babes
+ Good action and professional quality shoots
+ Good download speeds on vids
+ No DRM or download limits.
Cons: - Cross sales on sign-up page
- A lot more action in the vids than the pics
- Only about 75% of the vids have accompanying pics
- Search is OK but could be better
- Each site in network updates 2x per month
- A few deadlinks and pics that don't load
Bottom Line: I signed up for this on the trial not really knowing what to expect and was pleasantly surprised. There's 13 sites with about 850 scenes in total. About half the network focuses on bj's while the rest is HC except for one interview oriented site. The HC focuses on interracial, teen, anal and MILFs so they cover most of the bases.

Pics: About 75% of the scenes have pics and all pic sets have zips. Only one size but they are pretty big but not HD in quality. Mostly professional shoots with good lighting. Some had a little graininess while most were quite sharp. You get from 50 to 500 pics per set. There's a lot more on the vids than in the pics (lots of poses before the action in the larger sets). Some sets have split zip files.

Videos: These come in mpeg and wmv. Largest size is 640x480 in wmv; other size is 320x240. Download speeds were good. Vids range from 10 to 30 minutes and on the long ones file size goes up to about 300 mb. The quality was pretty good overall and the action was pretty hot.

There is a model directory that goes across the network. With this many scenes it would be good have a more detailed search function but getting around and finding what you want wasn't that hard. All the sites seem to be updating which is good.

There is some content from Brazzer's and some looked a lot like Newsensations product but I can't be 100% sure. More than 70% of the content is exclusive I'd say. Mostly US pornstars with a few amateurs and euros tossed in. There is a decent amount of pov style shooting which I like but others may not. There are some bonus stream sites tossed in that aren't worth mentioning.

Overall, this was a pretty good network with lots of good action. I'm not into the whole bj thing so those sites didn't do much for me. The women are generally attractive and the action is hot and hard with lots of cum shots. Definitely worth checking it out, especially on the trial deal.

05-13-09  11:05pm

Replies (3)
Review
17
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(0)

86.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 22 sites and growing of exclusive hardcore content
+ No DRM, No DL limits
+ Multiple daily updates, nearly 2000 scenes throughout the network
+ Good search function across whole network
+ Very good user interface
+ All scenes have vids and pics (pics have zip)
+ Scenes actually have story lines although acting is, well, about average for pornstars
+ 40 bonus sites (nonexclusive third party movie clips, not really worth it but it's there)
Cons: - Pics are a bummer coming in at 900x600
- Video quality is just OK
- Too many pics in sets but they're getting better (new stuff has 700-1000 pics per set)
- 8 of the network sites no longer update
- Some minor technical problems
- Quality is only OK but certainly not amateur
- Smallish opaque watermark but it sometimes gets in the way of the action
Bottom Line: I reviewed this site 10 mos. ago but recently rejoined and I'm re-reviewing as I was too harsh on my initial take. For the uninitiated, this is a large network focusing on the Sir Mix-a-Lot school of porn (big booty and big busts). I'm not really a fan of the genre but there is enough content to satisfy just about everyone: they have big tit, big butt, anal, teen, interracial, schoolgirl and milf content. For those into American girl booty, silicone and tats, it's probably about the best site around for you.

PHOTOS: I'm a photo guy and so all I can say is that you join here for the vids. For some reason, the "Walmart's of Porn" (Brazzers, Newsensations, RealityKings, NaughtyAmerica -- they make their money on volume while the quality is spotty) all seem to go small with the pics (900x600). You get too many landscape shots here with a lot of dead space (hint, turn the camera sideways and zoom in a bit more). What is frustrating here is that some sets have random 1350x900 shots so they obviously know how to make them. Some shots are a bit grainy and out of focus but overall they are OK for the size.

VIDEOS: Vids come in WMV, Mpeg1, Mpeg4, and Ipod/psp formats and have a streaming option. The vids are not hi-def and come in clips or full length. They average about 30 min. long and are about 300-400 megs in size. Screen size is 640x480. Sort of like the pics, sometimes they get too much "dead space" in the shots but for the most part they are well done and entertaining with no talking camera men (yay).

I would say this site has the best user interface I've seen on a porn site. You can rate each scene and post comments. They have a "personal favorites" function too. There is a user forum with a ton of postings although it's mostly "Beavis & Butthead" level commentary. There are discount (tastefully small) ads for other sites with good prices. There is a very good search function with multiple search options available.

I did have some small technical issues: a few browser crashes, some sets had pics that didn't match the thumbnails, some dead links and pages that wouldn't load but most of these were overcome.

As an aside, I was happy to see Nicole Sheridan come out of retirement for a hot new scene here.

I'm scoring this site an 86 for two reasons. The main issue is quality. Like I said, Brazzer's has the Wal-Mart mentality of porn: they produce a lot and have reasonable membership fees with frequent discounts but they skimp on the quality. They're getting better but still have a ways to go. With HD vids and hi-rez pics, I'd put a score of 90 or more on this site. The other reason is that it does get a bit stale. A lot of scenes seem alike, performers appear in multiple genres, and the girls they use are usually not top shelf "hottie" talent.

Like I said, there is enough here for most anyone to get their money's worth for a month. It's not the best site but it's certainly worth a membership to check it out.

12-10-08  10:19pm

Replies (4)
Review
18
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)

85.0
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: + 4,000 interracial hardcore scenes spread over 23 sites covering a variety of niches. All scenes have pics and vids.
+ Bills through Epoch, easy cancellation.
+ Easy navigation and it works.
+ Most pics are 1000x1600 or better and come in zips.
+ Tags work and model directory seems complete.
+ Lots of fetish content (cuckold, bukkake, glory hole, etc.) if you're into that. Probably about 20% anal content overall.
+ Wide selection of girls (teen to 50+) and includes porn stars to amateurs.
+ Production value is mostly good.
+ Good file naming for organizing downloads.
Cons: - Updates are spotty. Only 3-4 updates per week over the whole network, some sites go months without updates. Only a couple of sites update once a week.
- Late coming to the party with HD pics and 1080 vids not starting until 2013. Site also claims it shoots in 4k HD but there are no 4k downloads available.
- Some sites are very repetitive in theme and shoots.
- Lots of racism and misogyny, especially in the earlier years. The whole IR thing is overplayed to me.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- Site is a bit slow. I never had download speeds cross the 900 kb/sec range.
- Had some issues with the inbrowser video player on a few sites - couldn't jump ahead in the video playback, had to reload the page a lot in order to get it to work.
- Almost all scenes shot using a single camera and mic which is a bit disappointing at times (Show me what's going on!).
- Large watermark in lower right hand of pics regardless of what it covers up, a few sites use multiple watermarks.
Bottom Line: As the most interesting man in the world says, "I don't always spend $30 a month on porn, but when I do, it's spent on watching on monster black dongs doing unspeakable acts with caucasian women". If you haven't guessed it already, the main theme here is interracial porn featuring black men who ... well, let's just say that to call them "well endowed" is like saying the MVP of your favorite sports league has "some talent".

Blacks on Blondes is the headliner with scenes going back 12 years but the main focus of this 23 site network is having white women encountering these black goliaths. The remaining sites have only started in the last 5 to 6 years. As noted above, there is a fair amount of cuckold, bukkake and other fetishes explored, some (watchingmydaughtergoblack, watchingmymomgoblack, and cuckoldsessions) more watchable than others (theminion is almost unwatchable - literally "food porn"). There are also a few sites with feature girls dedicated to shagging only black men (SpringThomas, RuthBlackwell, etc). Overall, a good mix of girls in terms of age and looks and situations although I will echo the point one recent comment made in that the quality of talent seems to be ebbing a bit in the last year.

PICS: All scenes have pics with zip downloads. The earliest pics are just too small (only applies to blacksonblondes). The 1000x1600 sizes appear in 2007 and the 2000x3000 in 2013. Most sets come in with about 150-200 pics. As noted, the watermark(s) are unnecessary and too big. Most pics appear to be screencaps which means you have to deal with some blurry shots or overly narrow focus fields which is par the course now a days. In probably 80-90% of the scenes, the vids have more content than the pics.

VIDS: Current vids have 4 mp4 download options (1080 being tops), and one large wmv file. All scenes have in browser viewing with a popup showing what action happens when along the play bar. 1080 doesn't start until 2013 and 720 starts about 2007. Have to admit that even the earliest videos looked good on my screen. I had no issues with downloading but I don't use a DL manager. There are no 4k vids which are advertised on the home page.

NAVIGATION: It's easy and it works. You can only search by each site but that works for me. They have a page jump function for each page on a site and you get 5 scenes per page. Model directory is complete and covers the whole site. Tags are a bit general as usual but work.

OVERALL: This was mostly enjoyable site with decent content. One main beef is that, with the exception of the most recent year or two, when you put 2 or more brothers together in a scene they can't stop yammering on about whatever. The early blacksonblondes shoots also feature an off camera "interviewer" who won't shut up either.

A lot of the sites are overly repetitive in their shoots. For example, in Interracial pickups you know the guy will start with the guy driving in his car talking about the weather and what positions each girl will do when and how the photo shoot will look. Not a deal breaker but annoying after a while.

However, if you do get bored with the scenes, just read the scene comments. Between the outright misogyny, racism, and juvenile directing hints you'll feel like the most enlightened person on the planet. A lot of the shoots (especially the earlier ones) overly emphasize the whole IR thing and there's generous use of the "N" word by everyone involved. As with most sites, when you start getting multiple guys on a girl, the girl quickly becomes nothing more than a sex object. Not unexpected given the nature of this network but outdated and overplayed in my book.

There is webcam advertising on every page and the few "extra sites" aren't worth looking at. There are also 2 gay sites associated with the network but I didn't check them out.

Despite my complaints I still give this place an 85. Tons of content in various niches, lots of girls from smoking hot to totally not (most models are attractive) and generally good production value. I downloaded more than I thought I would going in. Probably one of the better IR sites out there but if you're not sure if that's something for you then at least you know what you're getting into.

11-19-15  03:43pm

Replies (2)
Review
19
Visit 18X Girls

18X Girls
(0)

85.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + 1200+ scenes of mostly hardcore Eastern Euro hotties. Heavy emphasis on school girl and massage themes.
+ Huge pics (5700x3800) with zips, about 125 pics per set.
+ 1900x1200 HD vids with multiple download options and in browser playback. Generally good download speeds - 700 mb/sec or more on multiple channels when not in peak time).
+ Good $15 per month price through TBP.
+ Updates 2-3 times a week.
+ Professional production value.
Cons: - Site is sensitive to peak traffic times and can slow down a lot.
- Prechecked cross sale on sign up and advertising and cross sales in members area.
- Very little English in vids.
- A fair amount of anal if you're not into that.
- Almost all nonexclusive content (all stuff you see on Teenmegaworld and places like that).
- Site went through a "bad phase" around 2012 with some sub par material.
- A few problems with in browser streaming, fixed by watching in mp4 mode.
- Navigation just OK. Some missing tags and mislabelled scenes.
Bottom Line: Let's be clear here. You're not joining this site for exclusive content. Most of this stuff comes from other sites. What you're joining for is the better quality you get here over other sites so it's really more of a collectors site than a casual porn surfers paradise. You can find more quantity for about the same money elsewhere.

This is my second time around and while I joined expecting one thing I actually got 3 things. The oldest content is straight hardcore from Teenmegaworld. That's what I expected. Then, around 2012, the site jumped to daily updates and the quality of the girls and production value went down and you got a lot of solo girl scene. Over the last 15 months you now get something more like WOWGirls which is high production value, bright lights and more "heartcore" level porn but with some "tender anal" (an oxymoron?) thrown in. Interesting. Overall, I'd say the site is 75% hardcore now.

Here's a breakdown:

PICS: Pics are huge and that's I why I came back. I will note the cropping has gotten a bit tighter (I like full body) but it's still very good. The stuff around 2012 is not very good and poorly cropped. Save some hard drive room because the zip sets come in around 500 mb per set.

The most recent "heartcore" stuff is almost exclusively back lit with very bright sun light or lamps which can cause some pixelation and washout of the pic which can be annoying at times.

VIDS: I did have some playback issues with in stream browser as noted above. Download speeds varied a lot by time of day (peak traffic times sucked). Vids were very good quality overall though. Most vids were 20-25 minutes long and overall specs matched TBP's review specs. Again, with the brightly back lit new content, washout can appear in some scenes.

NAV: Like almost every porn site I come across, navigation needs work. You get only 3 search functions (hardcore, lez and solo) and the tagging for more detailed search is too inconsistent to bother with. At least updates are date stamped. The model directory seemed complete. Page jumps are also limited.

There aren't many male actors here and, as on reviewer complained, a few are a bit rough with the girls but this isn't uncommon with Eastern Euro porn and it's not terrible. The most recent models seem to have limp dick issues but don't overly detract from the scenes.

The site does get a bit repetitive, especially the last year or so with the constantly bright lit scenes and unending parade of massage and bedroom school girl scenes but there are definitely worse things to see than hot girls having sex.

Overall, if you know what are getting into and value quality over sheer quantity then this is definitely a place to consider. I gave this site an 85 rating mostly because of navigation/search and nonexclusive content.

01-09-15  02:32pm

Replies (4)
Review
20
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Tons of babes and content
+ 3 photo set and 2 vid updates daily
+ Pic sizes up to 3000 pixels
+ Vids from 2009 onward go up to 1280x720
+ High quality search and model directory
+ No download limits or DRM
+ Good 2 day full access trial for $2.44 through the bonus sites
+ 6 other sites offered of which only 3 have original content
+ Professional, high quality content
+ One of the better forums I've seen for members
+ Smallish or nonexistent watermarks
+ Good customer service
Cons: - Download speeds were a bit slow for me but it may just be a prolem on my end.
- Vids before 2009 mostly max out at 480x360
- Most of the pic sets clock in at 1020 x 720 or smaller
- Some advertising on the site but not terrible
- The 3k pixel photos only available in zip format
- A lot of nonexclusive content
Bottom Line: I was last here in '08 when I dished out an 81. Glad to see things have improved although, as we know, there's always room for improvement.

Pictures: About 9500 solo sets, 1350 HC sets and 880 lez sets. As noted, in '09 Twisty's started putting out 3000 pixel pictures but only in the zip sets. Why Shap? Especially since other sites go this big as an option and sometimes we just want to pluck the good stuff as opposed to downloading an 80mb file only to toss most of it later. Most sets have about 100 pics. Pics are professional and generally very good in terms of quality and lighting with some airbrushing, mostly on the solo sets. All sets have a zip function. Watermark is small, posting dates are included, and slideshow option is available (all definitely welcomed). About the only real negative is that most of the pics are 1020 or smaller but this is somewhat expected given the extensive history of content available.

Videos: About 1900 solo scenes, 950 HC scenes and 250 lez scenes available. As noted, the new stuff clocks in at 1280 sized and is very impressive in terms of quality. However, most of the stuff is 480x360. Once you go back more than about 18 months, you don't even get vid caps to see what the scenes contain (pain in the but). The oldest vids only come in clips, not full length scene. DL's available in WMV, MOV or pointless "phone" sized.

The model directory is excellent although, like most sites, sometimes models mysteriously pick up new names. The search has numerous variations available to sift through the content. Mostly, the tags seem pretty thorough but they are a bit weak on the oldest content in my opinion.

While they do have some exclusive content, most of the stuff is nonexclusive and can be found at other megasite / pornstar sites. Not necessarily bad, especially considering the trial price, but quality is sometimes downgraded in my comparisons to other sites when it comes to pic size, pic count per set, and video DL options.

The forum seems to be inhabited by people who are usually successful in getting their point across and they have lots of useful topics there. One of the better forums I've seen in pornland (excluding PU naturally).

I'm giving my score of 85 based solely on the Twistys content. Bump it up to about an 87 or 88 when you factor in the other sites (Annette Dawn, Bluefantasies and Naughtystaff are the only ones worth visiting).

Basically, you're not getting the cream of the crop of here in terms of quality or exclusivity. However, you are getting a ton of pretty good to very good content that keeps updating regularly and can keep you occupied for a while. This site should be rocking in a few more years when they get a lot more HD vids and if they bump the pic sizes to 3000 pixels outside of the zip only function.

01-26-10  07:49pm

Replies (0)
Review
21
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Freakin' huge amount of content
+ Good $20 TBP monthly membership
+ 30 updates per week (6 per day, M - F)
+ Good customer interaction with model ratings, personal favorites section, set/scene comments and a forum
+ No DRM
+ Supports download managers
+ Large photos (newest at 2500x1660) and all sets have zips and slideshow option and many have no or very small watermarks
+ Newer material appears to be mostly exclusive
+ Full tour available before joining
Cons: - Search function leaves a real nasty after taste
- More of a pic site than a video site
- Model names are strange here and model info is few and far between
- Quality varies
- "Teen" concept loosely defined, lots of 21 to 25 year olds.
- Older material is mostly nonexclusive
Bottom Line: I had high hopes when I joined this baby but was only moderately entertained: sort of like dating someone who you know ain't quite right but running with it anyways just for the sex ;) This site features a lot of Euro babes with the emphasis on photography.

Photos: 1280 HC sets, 1600 lez, 6000 solo and a smattering of other categories. As mentioned the newest stuff clocks in at 1660x2500 with older stuff at 2000x1300 or 1020x715 and a few 800x600. All have zip and many have a slideshow feature. Be wary if you're joining for the HC. 75% of this is leased content added a few years ago that's on all the megasites as is some newer stuff. Most of the newer solo stuff is exclusive but, again, a lot of the stuff past a couple of years ago is not. Most sets have 100 to 200 pics; oldest sets are smaller.

Vids = 560 HC, 180 Lez, and 800 solo. You get only get a couple of vid updates a week. Newest stuff is 720x480 on WMV while older is 350x240. Stream rates were only OK. Like the pics, you've probably seen the older stuff around.

My biggest beef is with the search function. There is 9 function search engine so it looks promising. However, even when limiting yourself to 1 or 2 of options you either get a couple of results or a ton of results. The only real way to find out what's there is to use the model directory or search by lez, HC or solo categories. With this much content that spells "p-a-i-n".

The pain goes deeper when you look at the categories. They use a magazine cover to show the girl but often times it's the same used for every shoot the girl does. You don't know what the content of the shoot is unless you dig into it.

There is very little if any info on most of the models. A lot of models, even known ones, somehow get stuck with different names so it's hard to find exactly what you're looking for.

Most of the emphasis here is on the youngish gals doing photo solo sets. For the most part, they were only OK. Not much eroticism or tease factor here. Part of this is due to the fact that they get a lot of their stuff from outside sources. This factor also explains why the quality can vary from set to set. Some are great, others are poorly cropped and shot.

The girls are generally fairly attractive. Not top shelf but not off the street either. Thankfully there was not a lot of silicon here, at least in the solo content and newer HC stuff.

This site gets an 85 for sheer volume, good pic sizes and good newer vids. You also get acccess to the Vivthomas bonus site. Not as big as his "real" site but not bad. It's definitely one of the better bonus sites you can get. It loses ground on it's half ass search function, varying quality and the fact that the older stuff has been around the block a few times.

If you like solo girls and pics this is a pretty good place for the value; just plan on spending some time digging through it all.

02-24-09  09:33pm

Replies (4)
Review
22
Visit Private.com

Private.com
(0)

84.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Over 6,000 hardcore and lesbian scenes of mostly exclusive hardcore porn
+ A lot of attractive euro girls, mostly teen to early 20's with a few MILFs as well
+ $15 a month through TBP
+ No download limits
+ Good download speeds for me, about 2-3 mb/sec
+ HD files are not excessively large but no file size is ever given
+ Get to see a lot of porn stars, especially early in their careers
+ In browser playback is mostly smooth and you have different stream options
+ Allows for comments, saving scenes as favorites and rating scenes
+ Updates 6x per week
+ Mostly high production value, lots of exotic or unique scene locales too
+ About 90% exclusive content or at least Private media exclusive
Cons: - Prechecked cross sale
- Support is a bit questionable
- Almost, but not quite, a site for picture oriented porn geeks
- Limited model info, model directory not complete
- Search functions limited and scene tags are too broad for a decent search
- File names are terrible
- About 40% of content is not HD and there's some psuedo-HD as well
- Some scenes get repeated/recycled, especially early on
- Cannot download 4k vids, only stream them
- Just because an update occurs today doesn't mean the scene was shot recently ... or even this century (I'm not kidding).
- Lots of anal and dp if that isn't your thing.
Bottom Line: This incarnation of the Private website started in 2010 and consists of 251 pages of updates as of August 2017. This site is really a tale of 2 halves. Keep in mind that the date a scene is posted is not when it was shot. Thus, the oldest 125 pages is mostly content shot in the 90's or early 2000's on VHS and converted in 480 digital format. Ouch! Because Private was mostly about producing porn in exotic locales a lot of the early scenes suffer from poor lighting, poor sound, not so special special effects, tons of shitty background music, and the then European obsession with endless closeup shots. Because some scenes were shot in a foreign language Private decided to have the dialogue and sex sound overdubbed on some of these. I challenge you to not laugh as a low quality, poorly lit scene streams hideous overdubbed sex sounds from a double penetration with smooth jazz blaring in the background. Some early scenes get recycled too.

Things finally change with roughly the updates from 2013 onwards (the most recent half). You get HD vids on most updates. By 2014 you start getting reasonable picture counts with sizes coming in at 1600x1060 (96dpi) with some sets getting up to 1500x2300. 4K vids arrive in late 2015 but you can only stream at 4k, not download. They also get away from the obsession with closeups and some of the ultra exotic locales in favor of more set work with higher production values.

Here's some specs:

PICS: Not all scenes have pics (even recent ones) and most are at 1000x1500 (96dpi) with 1600x1060 sizes or larger coming since about 2014. The pic count offered by TBP and the Private is exaggerated. The early scenes only offered a few dozen pics at best and the majority of pics are mostly the obligatory pre-scene pose shots. Starting around 2012/13 you get more scenes with reasonable pic counts (80-200 per scene) without the endless posing. Like most sites, the vids typically show more action than the pics. All scenes with pics have zip downloads although file names are just a series of letters and numbers. The photo viewer sucks though, you only get 8 pics per page and have to frequently jump though a lot of pages to see if you want to download the zip. Pics aren't always in order either when viewing in browser or opening the zip file. The pics tend to be good quality but limited size makes this an iffy site for pic lovers.

VIDS: As noted above, a lot of the early content is just old standard media shots or VHS shots converted into 480p. 480 is only download option for about 40% of the content, otherwise you have options of 480, 720, 1080 or phone. HD comes along in 2013 but, suspiciously, you have 720 or 1080p as options – no transition from 720 to 1080 or “i” to “p” on the HD. I didn't dig into this deeply but given the age of some of these scenes there is no way they could have been shot at 1080p. Thus, my claim of “psuedo HD” on some scenes applies. Download speeds were good though and the file sizes were reasonable – I download mostly in 720 and half hour scenes were usually 500-700 mb. Scenes range from a few minutes to almost an hour, most fall into 15-30 minutes.

Navigation needs some work. Pagination is limited, but you can manually adjust for page numbers to jump around as needed. Model info is limited. Tags are too generic for any meaningful search and some scenes are mislabelled or tagged as well. As noted above, the picture viewer needs work. The inbrowser stream player works well and has the pop-up screen shot available on the time bar for most videos although how well it works varies from scene to scene. Really the only way to view this site is to page by page.

You signup (less prechecked cross sale) through rocketgate. To cancel you have to submit a support ticket. I was canceled within minutes but I did a confirmation email. Private also makes pretty clear that they don't do support.

A lot of the older content is endemic of what Euro porn used to be: closeups, background music, actors looking at the camera, and very male-centric in that the hot girls are really just willing props with an orifice for you to stick your meat into them. Often, if it went into one orifice it was going into all three. More recently it's a lot more reflective of what you see on DDF, 21st sextury and teenmegaworld. I stunned to see some heartcore type as recent updates. The scenes also have more of a story arc (no dp's within minutes of a girl meeting 2 strangers in the woods) and less emphasis on exotic locations and more on production value. While the production value rises some of what made Private Private has disappeared. It's less focused on exotic locales and scenes with lots of hardcore action and is now more generic in that the scenes now look like they could be shot by any of the major Euro companies.

Overall, the site gets most of it's points from the fact that there is so much content. It's too big to fail but could be better.

08-07-17  03:06pm

Replies (2)
Review
23
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(0)

84.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: ++ 30+ sites, 1700 models and 4100 scenes to keep you busy
++ Very good tags and cross site search functions
++ Lots of video options, especially the new stuff, and goes up 1080p
+ Cool function on the new videos where you hold your mouse over the play back bar and it shows what is happening during that section of the movie
+ Lots of social media and site interaction if you're into that stuff
+ Good monthly price through TBP
+ Others have said that the "live" section was gone in earlier reviews but it appears to be back, at least in recorded form.
+ Lots of American girls
+ Professional lighting and production value
+ Lots of options available for customer support and I got a prompt reply to my one issue.
+ All the content besides the live shows is hardcore
Cons: -- Not enough pictures and they're low quality (don't join for the pics)
-- Problems with downloads using Mozilla and with older scenes
-- Slow site at times (they need more servers)
- Cross sales on signup
- Stupid social networking keeps popping up
Bottom Line: I sort of joined this site at a bad time given I didn't have a lot of time to use it during my month and I'm sort of in a porn burnout phase. Nonetheless, I had mostly good experience but there wasn't enough to give it a top notch score that with a little effort this place could achieve.

PICS: Don't join for the pics. All scenes have pics but even the newest scenes max out at about 60 pics with a size of about 900x600. Too few and too low quality that could easily be solved. This site will never cross 90 for a score in my book so long as this continues. Also, when clicking a photo to bring it up to full size, you automatically go into slideshow mode even if you try to turn it off. All pic sets have zips but generally the pics on the network need help.

VIDS: The newest vids are great. You have mobile and "normal" download options. Sizes go up 1080p on the new stuff, older vids generally max out at about720 or 480. All vids have full scene or partial scene D/L options. All vids have stream options although even with a broad band connection the streaming was jumpy when trying to view it above 480 resolution. Download speeds were OK at 400 to 500 kbs. With older vids I sometimes had problems getting them to DL in the .wmv format (the only option available) because the screen taking you to the download page wouldn't download ... how's that for irony. As noted, the newer streaming vids let you mouse along the playback bar to reveal what action is taking place in that part of the scene. There are no screen caps though.

OTHER: Search is great. Scenes seem well tagged and the search engine is very good and comprehensive. There is no real model info though beyond the name. Navigation needs some work (a fair amount of clicking sometimes).

There are a fair number of boob jobs and the chicks, while most are US born and bred, are mostly average caliber porn stars. Not much anal but the site is mostly hardcore. Lots of niches with 30+ sites but the theme is pretty constant throughout the network. All high production value except the pics.

The social networking aspects are probably the best I've seen including a wiki (just a link ofr now) and a forum and user feedback galore if you're into that sort of stuff. The damn social networking needs to just go away though (pops up every new screen).

The site can be slow at times and I didn't like the fact that when viewing a specific models portfolio (many have multiple pages) that when navigating you always have to go back to page 1 even if you last on page 6.

So, there is lots to see and get involved with. For me, the pictures are a big negative along with some slow navigation and downloading issues. Overall, it was worth the money but I'd like to see some changes before I go back again.

07-11-11  03:42pm

Replies (3)
Review
24
Visit Nakedby

Nakedby
(0)

84.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Excellent photography featuring natural French girls
+ About 55 models with over 300 photo sets (all exclusive content)
+ High rez photos go up to 3000 pixels with zip, most sets have 40 to 100 pics
+ Good 7 day full access trial of $10
+ Some model information provided and nice clean site design
+ Photo updates every 2 days (vids about 1x per week)
+ No DRM
Cons: - Not really a video site. About 63 vids which parallel the photo sets with most around 7-8 minutes. Quality is very good at 720x575 with WMV, DiVX and QT options
- Some photo sets are just continuations of a previous (same basic clothing and/or set)
- Pure glamour, no hc, lesbians or toys (if this is minus for anyone)
- Some sets a little too dark or fetishy but not bad in my book
- Zip feature only available in medium size
Bottom Line: Overall, I was generally pleased with this site. I like photos, especially for softcore, and this site has very good photography and huge pics which I would expect from a high quality glamour site. The girls are mostly French and I haven't seen many of them before. The girls are natural (no boob jobs or nasty tattoos) and for the most part seem to enjoy what they are going here. This is all about the girls showing off so don't expect any toys or lesbianism here.

Some of the sets do a get a little dark or fetishy as some other reviewers have noted but that seems to be the case with a lot of photographer oriented sites who seem to think this enhances their work but it didn't bother me too much since this is not the general rule here.

There are about 12 "mysterious girls" who have photo sets where you don't see their face. They are pretty much average looking and don't really add to the site. If you're feeling rich you can spend a few hundred $ and buy some prints (unless you wanted to show the world your a rich perv I don't know why anyone would if you can download the high rez pics). The site design is simple and clean and you have a model directory. The photos sets are laid out in a magazine style similar to Met Art, Hegre Art and similar sites.

For me, this site ranks between Hegre Art and Met Art. Nothing tops Met Art for the sheer content amount and quality. The girls here are not the super skinny types that Hegre Art has a lot of and they don't seem as cold to the camera either.

Overall, it's worth the 7 day, $10 trial. There's not really enough content where you need to stay longer. Hopefully the site keeps growing, especially on the video side.

08-14-08  03:48pm

Replies (0)
Review
25
Visit Suze Video

Suze Video
(0)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Expanded libary now (100s of videos each in several different categories)
- Lots of attractive models
- No DRM
- Good customer support
- Good unrestricted trial offer (when available)
- Professional camera work
Cons: - Download speeds a little slow
- Video quality is average at best
- Navigation could be better
Bottom Line: I recently did a review of suze.net (photos site only) and recently reupped for the combined suze.net and suzevideo.net. I'm limiting my review here to the videos.

I'm primarily into photos and didn't spend a lot of time with the videos. You have several download options in WMV format. I did note that the speeds were a little slow and you don't get hi res, just average video quality at best. For the most part, the women are attractive and the scenes are hot so that is the trade off.

Navigation is a but of a bummer for both sites. When you have years worth of material but can only jump 2 pages at time you think they would make paging easier.

In a nutshell, the videos arent' bad, the most recent videos are best. However, Suze and company started in the photography era and the photos are probably the best part of the site. Maybe this will change. I would probably stick to the trial offer when they advertise for one -- in my other review I noted that you have to hunt for their trials but they are out there.

04-17-08  04:25pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-25 of 838 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.46 seconds.