| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
726
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Messmer, careful on the speed rating. The way you denoted the speed it would be faster than a 15K rpm fiber channel hard drive, which most like non of us have. I am assuming you meant KByte/s, but be careful with the difference between KByte and KBit. It is safest to type it out rather than risk confusing people on something as important as speed. Sorry to give you a hard time, this is a petpev of mine! :)
|
03-28-08 12:16pm
|
Reply
727
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
The email also mention HiDef video, but I do not know if that includes images or not. It is nice to see that at least some attempt is being made.
|
11-28-09 09:40am
|
Comment
728
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
|
11-28-09 03:31am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
729
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
avatar's Reply
I was a member a while back, and at the time they did not mention the price until you joined the regular section of the site. Anyway at the time the vip price $40 additional to the normal fee.
If you do not like airbrushing on your photos be forewarned there is a lot of it. The videos are not that great either. However, the models are very attractive!
Try a few things before paying the extra $40 though, there may be ways to easily download the photos, but I do not what they are because I paid the extra.....not worth it.
|
01-17-09 07:43pm
|
Reply
730
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
People's business models change as time goes on. I really do not know if they were trying to cover a cost somewhere, or just using a bait and switch move. You are right though about Porn Users. That is why I am here, let others know what I know and learn what others already know.
|
07-17-08 03:09pm
|
Reply
731
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Well now I cant comment on the 60s or even the 70s, but I do agree. Although, I have not "told the people" much lately. I have been working on a larger network.
I like it so much more I can say that a site is great or it sucks. There is now afterthought there. But the network I am working on now....I just dont know...grrr.
Hey man, keep these types of warnings coming....they save people money and frustration. I do not regret joining M&B previously, but I do not think I could justify to myself to do it again. Others I can not wait to rejoin, like Twistys an Sapphics. Good stuff.
|
04-24-08 11:27am
|
Reply
732
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
That is what I have been thinking so far. I always recieve these update emails from them and they always show some damn fine looking women, so it has been a little tempting. I just do not want to spend THAT much money for their stuff. I am actually wondering if then the TBP reviewers looked around the site they missed the part out the extra charge for the zips. Nothing against them though, it took me a bit to figure everything out and I was looking for that specifically and they are not honest enough to mention this fee during the tour...at least that I noticed.
I believe I will stick to my gut feeling, and your advise, and spend my porn dollars elsewhere. Thanks Denner
|
04-24-08 10:20am
|
Comment
733
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
|
04-23-08 07:26pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
734
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Nice content
Good amount of content
Very hot women |
| Cons: |
Scam on download options
pictures not large
pictures are air brushed |
| Bottom Line: |
It is a decent site, but I would hold off on it because you only want to have to download from once because of the bull shit $40 fee for really downloads. This is what is keeping me from returning for the updates! |
|
03-02-08 01:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
735
|
Mastasia
(0)
|
Reply of
xyzzy's Review
The boobs are real man!!! Real plastic that is. They appear to be attached to a vest the girls are wearing. They are likely silicon shelled air bags, with some sort of milk squirt gun for the lactation effect. In a few of the tour picture you can what looks to be the edge of this "breast vest" if you look in less than obvious places. Also notice that all the girls have shirts on that cover everything but the breast?
They are going to have to keep things the same since they are severely limited by the "breast vest" on what they can do. I guess the site would be cool to look at for the artistic or originality, but I seriously doubt is was meant to erotically interest most people.
|
05-27-09 07:19pm
|
Reply
736
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
drranger's Review
While I was not overly enthusiastic about this site I would say a 50 is certainly harsh. The bandwidth limit was not "hidden" as I was able to find it fairly easily. Of course I am not for bandwidth restriction.
The site really could use some quality work. There really is no reason the quality is not better, on the fly or not. Of course I do not expect glamor but it could be much better.
Seeing all the new faces and familiar faces long before they were familiar is definitely worth a few points.
As of the last time I was there, the lay out did need some work, I will agree with you there.
|
05-01-09 11:04pm
|
Reply
737
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I can agree with this. I was excited to find some Amy Reid content from when she was brand new that was not floating around everywhere! This seems to be a "back in the day" sort of site. I agree with your actual review when you said this is not a good site to be used as a first porn site.
|
03-24-08 07:35pm
|
Review
738
|
Matt's Models
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good amount of content
Easy to download, batch downloading
Great download speed. 40 MBit/s
Files named nicely
Nearly 3000 Zip sets
Close to 1000 videos
Newer videos look nice
$15 price is not bad |
| Cons: |
Very unprofessional
Picture on the small side, except for the newest
Site is a pain to get around
Mostly couch scenes
Download managers are not fully suported |
| Bottom Line: |
The price for this site makes it would a look. It is possible to download the zips in a batch download for you picture lovers. This makes download all 3000 zips pretty easy. The speeds are not bad either, I saw 40 MBit/s.
Be careful with download managers. They work to download the content once it is in queue, but if you use the manager to scan the site you will be locked out for browsing too many pages too quickly. This is not a huge issue though because they reset the lockout list every 15 minutes.
The videos vary on size and bit rate, but the newer half at least is 640x480 and around 1000 KBit/s. There are some that are half that, but those are older and that is usually to be expected.
The newest photo set, March 23, as about 100 photos in it and they are 1600x1067. They look nice, but of course the older ones are smaller 683x512.
A good portion of the videos are "audition" videos, then some masturbation videos. There is not a lot of G/G and some B/G, but not much. Some of the videos make you open separate browsers even when clicking the download link, and there are other things that make the site navigation a little of a pain.
They also claim to be the first to shoot Amy Reid, I am a big fan of her! :)
If you are bored on day and want a site that does not cost an arm and a leg, and do not mind less than perfect content then this site would be recommended. But if you want top rate photos and well planned scenes then you should look elsewhere |
|
03-24-08 07:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
739
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
Pics too big for screen. The first I have heard someone complain about resolution being too high. Use a resizing program, solve all these issues. Others of us with high res monitor like the larger pictures!
I must agree with the fast stripping though...slow it down a bit. Add more pictures if you have to. Lead up to the prize and it will be more enjoyed. Kinda like your mouth watering as you try to open a candy bar wrapper, you know it is coming and you know it will be good, it just make you want it that much more!
|
03-24-08 07:03pm
|
Reply
740
|
Mature.nl
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
You are right, that is insane. The only way I can see paying anything remotely close to the price is if the site is covering a unique niche and doing a damn good job of it. For example something like "midget lesbians having sex while skydiving" niche and making a lot of great videos in HD. That might warrant the price because it is likely the only place it will ever be seen. But this site does not seem to have anything that other mature women sites would not have. Perhaps they feel that since we pay $20 to see 20 year olds and $30 for allover30 they feel they should follow the pattern and ask for $60 for 60 year olds! Or perhaps an escort come with the membership fee.
Seriously though, $60 a month is simply suicide. They could probably charge half that and get ten times the members. I guess someone was very, very high when deciding the price.
|
07-08-09 07:44pm
|
Reply
741
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I like the sound of the reduced price. Hopefully more sites will jump on that!
|
09-22-09 08:16pm
|
Reply
742
|
Melissa Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I will have to agree that while he did not give statistical data he did provide useful information. Informed us of his grievance and told us way he feels that way. Off course I like the statistical data, but if the site blows then I guess it is not all that important. Besides, usually when a new guy comes to complaint about a site all the basically say is "this site suck" and that is all. So all in all, not bad by me.
|
05-27-09 03:51pm
|
Reply
743
|
Men In Pain
(0)
|
Reply of
Zoe1980's Review
Hey now, better give us some more information to support that 100 score. I can tell you from experience that those do not go unnoticed around here. Please tell us more about why you think it deserves such a score. What kind of videos do they have, how many, picture sizes, navigation advantages, pricing, anything that makes it stand out from similar sites. By the way, you are misspelling "site"...not that I am one to judge someone on spelling. :)
If you would like to see what 100 scores get you, check out my review of Video Box I wrote a few months ago. You might find it entertaining at least.
|
06-15-08 06:02pm
|
Reply
744
|
Messy Models Asia
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
These do not look bad. I downloaded them a few days ago. They are all non-nude though. It looks like this site is an asian version all wam. They did not show a lot of nudity either. Site would e worth joining if the girls where not clothed, or at least ended up nude.
|
05-02-08 02:35pm
|
Reply
745
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
As long as everyone knows the price before jumping in then all is fair, at least as far as TBP/PU go. It becomes up to the PU'er to decide. Does anyone have any insight onto whether or not there are differences in cost to provide content in different areas of the globe. I am wondering if this plays any role, or if they are just being pricks?
|
04-29-12 03:46pm
|
Reply
746
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I would absolutely love to see the girls getting more frisky with each other. That is one of the things I liked about FTV Girls and MC-Nudes, very similar sites, but more girl on girls action going on!
|
12-06-08 01:06pm
|
Review
747
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Full network access
320 Scenes
Zipped photos
Easy layout
Many great looking women
Most women are shaved and have nice tits
Good lead up to sex
Fair price at $25
Updates every Monday |
| Cons: |
Photos are small, even the newer ones
The download limit sucks
Could use more variety in scenes
Needs more group scenes
Older videos can only be downloaded in chunks
Video clarity needs work |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are into mature women this site is a must have. It offers a great deal of content at a decent price. Plus the network access makes it so much larger!
There are very few sub-par looking women here and a good lead up to the actual sex. Actually the lead up to the sex can be rather boring at times and needs some trimming. But I would rather askip ahead a bit than have them start the scene with them already going at it.
The pictures are pretty small here, 900x600 on the better end. the older ones are even smaller. Fortunately they come in zips though. Each scene has its own zip set, so 320 totaling for 8.4 GB.
The videos are pretty long at about 40 minutes for many of them. They do not look bad at 100% zoom, but at 200% they look fairly pixely. Their bit rate is 1-1.4 MBit/s and can be up to 500 MB for a full video. Currently they update every Monday pretty consistently so as of this review you would need 86 GB to download them all.
Also, there is a good deal of fake boobs here, so if you are turned off by that. Personally I do not mind, besides most of them are reasonable looking.
The idea for the site that a guy is walking around and runs into a hot woman in her 30s or so and ends up banging here. The story line is standard for the whole site, but who really cares anyway.
Since you would already have access to this site through the network it is worth looking at at least. And there is several milf sites on the network, so what are you waiting for? |
|
07-14-08 06:22pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
748
|
MILF Next Door
(0)
|
|
07-17-08 04:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
749
|
Miss Hybrid
(0)
|
Reply of
350Z's Review
I would like to add my two cents here. I do not think that he did a bad review. We may disagree with his views on download limits but that can be largely do to preferences and browsing styles.
He gave a good amount of detail and provided backing for his thoughts. He told us why he scored how he did. You do not have to agree with his score for you to find the review useful. Because he explained everything he enabled us to score the site in our own mind and that is what is important. As for the "shilling" he did mention some cons that are very good to know about. So it was an honest and useful review in my book, and we can see that at least two others agree (trust votes).
I believe a few of you were a pretty harsh on him with no real cause to do so. Do not be so quick to throw out a red flag simply because a new reviewer comes along and gives a site a good review. It just may be that he liked the site enough that he thought it warranted going out on a limb and telling others about it. It seems you cut down the limb he when out on. He has since disabled his account and I can not say I blame him. This is exactly how to chase away new members, and I have a felling that he might have been a good asset for this site.
350z. If you happen to read this please do come back. I for one would be glad to see you tell us about more of your experiences, especially if you can replicate the quality of this review.
Funny part is one of the guys who give 350z shit only had 6 review points and the other was a big fat goose egg. Come on guys, if you are going to haze someone make sure you are not a newbie yourself. You two should consider yourselves bitch slapped.
|
04-12-10 08:24pm
|
Reply
750
|
Mobile Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I had not thought of the cell phone download legal age issues. I do agree though that cell porn will be a short lived fad. At least I hope it is!
|
06-04-09 11:19pm
|
