| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
751
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
This is a lesson well learned by many of us here. I could not image joining a site that had no download. I would make it a mission to get everything just for the feeling of victory.
Try a program like Internet Download Manager (IDM) and see if you can grab the streams. It is a pain but it works on many sites. Sometimes you need to be a bit creative to get what you paid for.
|
01-06-16 04:38pm
|
Reply
752
|
Mom's A Cheater
(0)
|
Reply of
PaulCS's Reply
So then what, it is okay to rip people off who did not sign up through TBP? Sounds a bit fishy to me. Based on that you are taking what we say here and making us happy, but only us. Some people are coming to this site to post their misfortunes only after signing up for the site the way many people would do. Not everyone signs up through TBP! I did sign up through here and still got email notices from other sites even after making sure there was no cross sales checked, I am not new at the sign up process after all.
You guys have a reasonable site with a lot of hard to find content. Even though your site is not my style, many people would enjoy it and not mind paying the membership fees. It is sad to see you guys doing this to yourselves, and is inexcusable to see it done to the rest of the porn community!
|
05-02-08 01:11pm
|
Reply
753
|
Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
The only thing I can say about that is that they never do say the breasts are all natural. Brazzers is about big tits and they couldn't care less how they go there! I like fake breasts, to a point though. But somehow natural does seem to be better. Perhaps you should give Big Naturals a try, there are some pretty damn good looking natural ones there! :)
|
06-18-08 02:46pm
|
Reply
754
|
Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
delta69's Review
Are you speaking of MBit/s or MBytes/s? Big difference and important to know! i hope you are speaking of MegaBytes, because I have seen 4 MegaBytes/sec from them.
|
03-18-08 09:06pm
|
Reply
755
|
Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
I would not call the photos high resolution! They are pretty much all at 600 x 900. This is barely half a mega-pixel! This is something the site truly needs to work on. I just check this for the March 17 2008 update.
I also agree with the covered bellies too. And yes you can tell that some of the women have extremely augmented boobs. Not all look bad and the is a good handful of women with real boobs! :)
Also, they did redo the site around Christmas time, it is a little easier to navigate the network now.
But I do realize that this review is a few moths old by this point. I jut wanted to point out about the picture resolution.
|
03-18-08 08:58pm
|
Comment
756
|
Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
|
|
03-18-08 08:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
757
|
Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Review
Just a warning! Be prepared to be hazed and have very detailed answers for questions based on the rating you gave this site. 100 ratings are not viewed lightly on this forum for damn good reason. I should know this because I have been defending a 100 score on videobox or a few weeks now!
Can you give a detailed reason as to why you give this site a 100? What is not good about this site? Every site has something that could be better (that does not make it unperfect). You are going to have to give a real good reason as to why you feel Brazzers is perfect. No one will trust this review if you do not justify it.
Keep in mind that I have reviewed their site and I am a current member and have been so for nearly a year. I would not call them perfect! They are great though, but could use work on quality. The photos in the sets are rather small and the videos are not HD, when that should be standard for new sites and old ones alike.
Please check out my review of the site, and perhaps my review of videobox (the replies!) just to see what happens when people notice a 100 rating here! It is rather entertaining. :)
|
03-17-08 11:52pm
|
Review
758
|
Monica Martin
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Unique content, not many women have her look
-Content is exclusive
-Updates frequently
-Very easy navigation
-Updates are dated |
| Cons: |
-Definitely needs growth
-Extremely limited amount of nudity
-No bottomless videos or photos
-Inconsistent file types for videos
-Videos are non nude
-Pricing is confusing
-Video and photo quality need work |
| Bottom Line: |
NOT A PORN SITE
There is very limited amount of nudity here and what there is topless only. The site is mainly about Monica posting photo shoots from previous years.
There is some new stuff being posted that seems more like what you expect from a web site. The newer videos are much better quality as well.
Older videos, well not that there is that many anyway, can be of fairly low quality. New is better but still needs work. The resolution is low at 320x240 for all of them. The photos are not high res either. They go up to about 800x1100.
The site is very small. There is 70 photo sets equaling 1.55 GB and 2.17 GB of videos.
Most of the photo shoot are actual posing and some of them are pretty hot an several are topless. The videos are a lot of Monica working out with a hot blonde, wrestling, and some posing. They really are noting elaborate or special.
I would like to see some nude modeling and perhaps some of her friends as well. And definitely going bottomless too. I doubt we will ever see any hardcore from her site, that is not what it is about, but I believe more shoots showing her whole body would be great. That, and just more shoots in general, there is no reason this site could not grow faster.
If this had been a site featuring just any woman I would give it a much lower score. But this is not a niche that any woman can be in, so she gets a handful of points just for being different. hell, a lot of women (and men) are doing good to go to the gym more than a few times a year and that is usually just for a week right after the new years.
For this site to be worth your money you really need to be into buff chicks. If that is not your thing than you will not be happy here. Of course if you are a fan of Monica Martin or of bodybuilding than this site would be worth at least checkout out the tour pages.
Again, NOT A PORN SITE in the traditional sense. |
|
11-17-08 12:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
759
|
Monster Curves
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Nice looking woman
-Site still growing, updates weekly on Thursday
-Full access to great network
-Price is decent, $25
-Videos are long, around 45 minutes
-Exclusive
-Site navigation is pretty simple
-Offers zips for photo sets
-No need to log in frequently |
| Cons: |
-DOWNLOAD LIMIT
-Photos are small, 900x600
-Videos need to look better, 1.2-1.4 MBit/s does not cut it for quality. But, if they increase this then the files would be much larger, but it should be an option.
-Only 33 videos so far, but this is to be expected for a younger site on this network
-Need to list all names of girls on outer page, not just one |
| Bottom Line: |
This site by it self is not completely worth the price, but since it give access to the network it becomes instantly worth while. Plus, the models here appear on many of the other sites anyway.
There is a fair amount of lead up to the sex, which is nice and should be expected from a 45 minute scene. Some sites just jump right in which I know some of us do not prefer.
The video quality really needs some work. They look nice at 100% zoom, 720x480, but are very pixelly at full screen. The videos are a manageable 300-500 MB and total for 12.5 GB. I believe they would look much nicer at 3 MBit/s, but not everyone is willing to download 600-1000 MB videos assuming the same duration. There is the option of downloading in chunks for those who prefer that.
The photos are rather small, but they are clear looking. They need to work on the size of these, but this really is a video site.
The download limit stinks, but would only take 2 days to download all the videos from this one anyway since they allow 15 per day. It gets more annoying on the larger sites though if you use your network access.
Navigation is easy, all the videos are listed on one page and each video has a small description on its own page with a list of actors, male and female, but the front page only shows one name and many scenes have two or more girls.
The only reason to jump onto this one is if you are into ass scenes, a lot of doggy style. Otherwise, it is all about network access. |
|
06-24-08 02:53pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
760
|
Ms Jaylene Rio
(0)
|
Reply of
jaylenefan's Review
High Resolution pictures are not considered a con by the vast majority of people. In fact, many people list it as a con if the pictures are not larger than the size of the screen. Nicer sites can have resolutions as high as 4000 or more.
|
12-13-08 06:07pm
|
Reply
761
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
Reply of
monica's Reply
Dimensions are a tricky thing right now because so many people have different size monitors. 640x480 used to be ideal because everyone had 4:3 monitors and the resolution was not all that high say 800x600. But now many 4:3 monitors feature resolutions of 1600x1200 and some higher.
Also, many people have switched to widescreen, so now the aspect ratio is in question. It is all compromise at this point.
Now the resolution to use. The higher the better, at least for the highest option you would offer. ideally you would offer an HD option and retain something close to you current. 1.5 to 2 MBit video is pretty easy to play and even people with lighter, older machines can enjoy that. But many of us have more modern computers that can easily hand very high bit rates. Of course, it is important that any increase in bit rate is utilized close to its full potential. It is easy to make a video 6 MBit from 1 Mbit, but it will look no better.
A few sites have gone as high as a 1440 resolution. These videos look phenomenal but can be practically impossible to play if the user does not have reasonable video capacity. Ideally i would look into resolutions of 1280x720 for your higher end at this point. Of course you camera must be able to shoot this. Most computers can play this without much issue and those of us with good video ability would still be able skip around the video fairly easily.
Of course, none of this means anything without using decent cameras and video compression. Being able to offer beautiful videos costs money, but that is only a one time payment. Well, there is storage and bandwidth costs. But, if bandwidth becomes and issue it is a blessing at the same time because that means your spectacular videos have attracted more members and more revenue. Besides, sites like TBP have search options for video quality, and it would be great for you if your site where to show up under the HD listing.
I am certainly glad to be helpful to you. If my suggestion prove fruitful for you than it has helped you become successful, and provides us with another good site to enjoy. Sounds like a win-win deal to me.
|
11-11-08 07:31pm
|
Reply
762
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
Reply of
monica's Reply
Have you considered increasing the bit rates on the videos. Many of us would call 1000 KBit the bare minimum for new content, and the 512 and 256 just fluff. It would be much more appealing if you offered good videos in the 3000 KBit range.
A site can not be built under the assumption that people are still using dial up. While it is nice for those with minimal internet connections and storage space, it is a deterrent for those of us with moderate connections and plenty of storage. I would gladly wait 3 times as long for a 3000 KBit video and would enjoy it 100 times more.
For a softcore site I believe video quality is a paramount issue. Those kind of videos are not showing us much, which is fine, but I better be able to everything that is being shown.
|
11-11-08 12:46pm
|
Reply
763
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
Reply of
monica's Reply
A webmaster actually recommending holding off on joining until more videos can be posted. Either it is insane or pure genius! Most people want the revenue to start flowing on smaller sites to help the site grow, where as you taking the honest and concerning approach.
You certainly get point from me for being honest enough, or smart enough, to recommend that a video fan hold off on joining so that he will not be disappointed. Two good things here, Cybertoad does not feel ripped off when he find a limited number of videos, and you do not have to deal with an unhappy customer. Even better for you, you make yourself look wonderful on this site, and at the same time avoided a respected PU telling us of the video shortcomings in the form of disappointment.
We PUs like you already, and please do keep us posted about an influx of videos. Also, can you tell us what the dimensions and bit rates will be for your videos?
|
11-10-08 09:16pm
|
Reply
764
|
Naked Closet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
In my email to them I did not mention TBP. I pretty much never do mention TBP in correspondences with websites. I mentioned them here because they have the same price displayed as the sign up page did and it was on the same day that TBP posted that site.
You are correct about the length of the trial. I knew it was two days when going into this, and it does not change anything here. I did not check on the duration of the trial before responding since that is not the part in question.
I sent them one email with everything in it, including quotes of the pricing. Also a request for a refund of the difference. I have no issues with paying the $14.95, since that is what I had expected to pay anyway.
Hopefully they are decent about it, I am still sorting out my last credit card issue!
|
06-12-09 04:15pm
|
Reply
765
|
Naked Closet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I mention TBP because that is where I first seen the price, and it was on their update for that day.
I signed up for a 3 day trial to see if I liked it or if they had anything good. TBP showed that the site would rebill at $14.95 and the site said the same thing on the sign up page. TBP is not to blame because I seen the same thing they did.
The deal here worked just like any other trial. After a few days access it recurs at what ever the recur amount should be. Since the sign up page stated that the 30 membership for $24.95 or the trial for $4.95 would recur at $14.95 I thought it seemed like a decent deal.
TBP got their information from the same place I did, the sign up page. The issue is that is not what they charge. They have another set for rules listed in the customer service page. Of course a person usually only goes to this page AFTER having a problem, not before.
The point is that they advertise one price up front, and they charge based off a price that is displayed somewhere other than the sign up page.
As for me, my trial rebilled at the higher amount. Not the amount shown on the sign up page. So in effect I was billed $10 more than I had expected for the additional 30 days.
|
06-12-09 11:31am
|
Comment
766
|
Naked Closet
(0)
|
|
06-12-09 01:16am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
767
|
Naked Closet
(0)
|
|
06-04-09 08:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
768
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Review
I never had issues with their site. You seem to have an awful lot of pros in there to give it a 51, or a 20% as you say. Did you try to get a hold of their customer service? Did you try clearing all your cookies, brownies, and other baked goods?
|
03-30-10 05:49pm
|
Reply
769
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
Renewing at $25 does not sound nice to me. I think they are counting on us college pervs to be lazy and forget to cancel.
|
09-15-09 01:29pm
|
Reply
770
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
Did they make an mention to how a user would go about getting these discounts? It is too bad that deal is going away. It made them a very good deal, and completely irresistible to anyone on a budget.
|
09-01-09 09:10pm
|
Reply
771
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
I would not call them DVD quality. They quality is not bad but it is not up to DVD. I know they have a "DVD quality" option to download which I always use for anything that offers it. The videos are at 2000k. The DVDs that are produced by them actually do look better. Same goes for other sites that also produce DVDs.
|
05-26-09 09:58am
|
Reply
772
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
As did I. This is a terribly hard deal to pass up.
|
03-19-09 01:48am
|
Comment
773
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
03-13-09 10:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
774
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
I could not have asked for better timing! I have a subscription somewhere else ending tonight and NA was my next place to go. Perfect! I knew there was a reason I hung around this place.
Thanks for the heads up and all the work.
|
03-04-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
775
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Brazzers have been using 1800 KBit. RK was a bit lower, at1500 KBit. Personally I always download the highest quality available. I always want the highest quality no matter the size. I am not beyond downloading 3 GB videos if that is what a site offers.
|
02-20-09 04:46pm
|
