| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
The physical quality of the video, resolution, bit rate and such. Do they look better than most places or are they not much different.
|
02-20-09 11:30am
|
Reply
777
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Well, I am not going to poop in your sand box too much. You do bring some very valid points. It really is a slight difference in opinion, but only on the scoring. The review and reasoning are solid as my dick was the first time I ever seen a porn. :)
I will have to check this site out by the way. I have never made it around to them yet.
Videobox is at a disadvantage when it comes to making it entertaining, they do not make the content. As for the model names, even i have noticed a few mix ups. If I notice a model name wrong there is a serious problem, I am lucky to remember my friends names!
Since I have your attention. How does the video quality compare at NA to videobox and brazzers. Videobox has better looking videos than Brazzers, but I would not want to go much lower than Brazzer's quality. I am hoping they have a higher quality than Brazzers and especially RK. I do not mind huge file sizes if it gets me good looking videos.
Might I suggest in you BL to but "My Take" paragraph and an "Average Joe" paragraph that is clearly defined. This way you can include both clearly. I kinda like that idea, I may just do that myself!
|
02-19-09 11:47pm
|
Reply
778
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
I just do not understand rating a site you prefer lower than another. Is there something fundamental that Brazzers and NA do better than Videobox? When I look at a score I see the score that the review gives the site based on what they feel it deserves, not what they people others believe it deserves. This is exactly why I am not telling you that one site is more deserving than another, because that is up to you to decide. The way your reply reads you are saying that you score sites not based what you like but rather what others like, a popular vote if you will. I certainly hope that is not the case.
You say that NA and Brazzers post content in a more appealing way, and this is a reason to show favor to them, I tend to agree. Perhaps we just have a difference in our logic. Not that either one is wrong, I am just trying to figure out yours.
What if someone is interested in finding particular models. Obviously you can not list every model on the site, but it would be worth noting if a site has usual models or unique models. You are not the only person interested in collecting this way. Exotics is the same way. But you are also correct in saying that some people have less concern over models, I am one of them to an extent.
What I am after is what, in your opinion, makes NA better than all other sites? Not what other people think.
|
02-19-09 09:05pm
|
Reply
779
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
As a rule we must give you some grief for posting a 100. So here it is.
The last thing you say is "On an overall scale? I prefer VideoBox." Now that is simply wrong right there. A site can not be viewed as perfect, by you, if you actually prefer another site. I also might add that you scored Videobox as a 95.
As I mentioned before, everyone is entitled a 100, in my opinion. The site someone chooses as a 100 does not actually need to be perfect, but it should be the one site that you would stay a member with if you could choose one and only one site. So now if you would choose this site over Videobox than assigning a 100 is fine, but you need to tell us what makes this site better for you. Again, the key question, is this site the best site out there for you? If you can not say yes then the site does not meet the requirements for perfection.
I believe I went into this somewhere else on this site, but my view of perfection for a site is one that is the absolute best. A perfect site is of course unattainable, so we are left with calling the best the current definition of perfection and the close running sites are near current perfection.
I guess I get a little anal about this, but you are certainly free to ignore me. I will just bug you forever then! :) Don't worry though, I am not going to yank my trust vote over it.
Oh yeah, reason number two. You passed me on point...grrrr...(shaking fist in the air) ... :)
|
02-19-09 06:27pm
|
Reply
780
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Everyone is entitled to their 100. But seriously, we do have to find a way to bust his balls about it! :)
|
02-19-09 06:12pm
|
Reply
781
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Comment
So you are saying to keep this on your normal hard drive so when she finds it she does not think much of it. However, we must keep the other 98% of our collection somewhere else! :)
Seriously though, this was a very insightful comment. It is usually not something I consider when reviewing a site.
|
12-27-08 01:03pm
|
Reply
782
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Reply
Gotcha. The ones on the preview page did not look so good, she should put a HD sample out there.
Hey. We were all new at everything we have ever don at one point. So do not think much of it. We all do things that are easy to criticizes after the fact. It is just a matter of being man enough to say "oh, duh that makes sense!"
Anyway, welcome to PU and keep coming back.
|
09-25-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
783
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Comment
You kinda should have put this as a reply to the comment you are reply to. This way people do not wonder what you are talking about, or have to dig for the comment you are replying to.
I do have a question for you though. Is the quality in the site the same as seen in the preview videos?
|
09-25-08 09:04pm
|
Reply
784
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Comment
Wouldn't this be better to send to her email or say on her site?
At least give us a description of the show!
|
09-22-08 05:06pm
|
Reply
785
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Thanks for the great information. Will add them to the list of sites to not join.
|
05-04-14 01:44pm
|
Reply
786
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
If you ask me, dont give them another dime. Sites did not need to do this 10 years ago and certainly do not need to do it now. Worst case should just use some throttling during heavy periods. In reality they do this so that you need to pay for many months to get what they have.
Thanks for the very informative post!
|
05-04-14 09:19am
|
Reply
787
|
Nicole Graves
(0)
|
Reply of
jake07621's Reply
The photos do come in zips, but not all of them. Go figure! It is kinda random which ones are in zips. Most are, but a few are not. The site is worth a look at though!
|
03-18-08 10:57pm
|
Review
788
|
Nicole Graves
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Nicole is very good looking. Seriously Hot
Verity of scenes on site
Interacts with fans
Trial price is nice
Trial gives full access
Quality is decent on newer videos
Has solo, B/G and a little G/G |
| Cons: |
Not all photo sets have zips
Not HD
Videos not named individually
Needs to grow, but every site does! |
| Bottom Line: |
The trial price is a steal here, as in you steal from them! Definitely worth a look.
The videos have bit rates between 900 Kbit/s for the older ones to up to 2030 Kbit/s. Not all of the new ones are this high, some are at 1600. Nicole does take requests for certain things. A lot of the videos are of her using a purple dildo.
Not all the photo sets have zip files with them which can be a bit annoying, I hope they fix this. They do have a slide viewer though. Teh photos are 1200x800 which is not great, but is not terrible either. They seem to look fairly clear.
Nicole is not the only girl on the site. There are two others I believe. They do a few lesbian scenes but not many. She does take user requests as well. Nicole can also be seen on Twistys. She truly is gorgeous.
About 17 GB worth of videos. I believe everything shot now should be in HD and compressed for those who want lower qualities. I recommend that to this site and every site out there. But I can not knock point off for it since the videos still look good. |
|
03-08-08 02:47pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
789
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Oh!!! That is not so bad. I wish they would make it shorter though. Like 3 months and then have yo go to ccbill and press renew or something. This would take care of the problem of forgetting to cancel and thinking you did for 2 years and $600 later.
Thanks for update and correction!
|
06-06-08 02:12pm
|
Reply
790
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
WOW!!! I have never seen that either. A good number of places offer a 12 month or so deal, but it is usually half price or something, Videobox and Playboy do this. But to charge full price for every month, and to make 12 months mandatory is a bit extreme.
Thank you for a hell of a good warning! This site is going on my shit list!
|
06-04-08 02:44pm
|
Reply
791
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
Interviews are great, but most of us do not download the videos for the interviews. I always say more content is better. I thought would be to make the interviews separate from the normal video. This way people who are not interested in them do not need to download them, and those who are interested can specifically download them. As I said, it is just a thought.
I personally have never been a picky person on here the girls come from. A good looking woman is a good looking woman!
|
03-04-09 12:35am
|
Reply
792
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
When did you guys start posting videos at 720? I do not recall of hand seeing any that high, but it has been a while since I looked through my Nubiles video collection.
Thank you for the reply and information. Informed customers are happy customers. We do not like unpleasant surprises.
I do not agree with artificially increasing bit rate or resolution without some hardcore processing first. If it is 8 MBit it better look look a hell of a lot better than a 3 or 4 Mbit video. Everyone here knows I do not mind large files, what's another terabyte or so, but if I can have a 500 MB file that looks just as good or even better than a GB file I am definitely all for it. That is more bang for my buck and yours.
I would not focus on making that stats of the videos seem more impressive on the tour pages. Rather, make the videos look absolutely stunning and they will speak for themselves!
|
12-12-08 05:38pm
|
Reply
793
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
arangon's Review
"Not real HD in 1920x1080"
How many sites have resolutions that high yet? I am a huge fan of high resolution and I can tell you there are not that many, at least that offer good material. Besides, is it necessary for the videos to be 1080? They need to look good, bot be big. Videos at 480 can look fabulous, while the same video at 1440 might look worse actually. It is all about what they with what they have. Just like a cheap digital camera with 8 MP, it will look no better than the other model by the same maker that is 3 MP because it uses the same CCD but they just crammed more pixels on it.
But in your defense, this site does need to do a bit of work to the video quality. Good looking HD would be a great addition and would certainly get my credit cards attention.
|
12-10-08 04:56pm
|
Reply
794
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
three3's Reply
I will tell you anything you want to know, but i will do it here so everyone can read it. Someone else might find the information useful as well.
I used Internet Download Manager (IDM) for the downloading. It is a pretty good manager, everyone has their favorite though. They are fairly similar in function, just some have features that others do not and some download a little differently than others allowing different managers to work better at different places.
The method was simply click on every link, sounds terrible but it is how I do it if I need to. This site has several download options and the files are not perfectly consistent. So using a site grabber, IDM has this as well, would result in downloading the same content in different formats or risk missing a good quantity of it.
SOmething worth mentioning is that the zip files for the picture sets are named only with scene discription and not model name. I like having the model name on everything since this makes searching easier later on. For this is use D-Systems Keyboard Remapper. This allows me to set a key on my keyboard to run a macro. What I do is highlight her name, press a certain key to copy the name, then click the link and press another key on the save as window to add this text and whatever text I want, site name for example, and it adds it to the file name without me actually having to type this every time. It makes it take a little longer but it saves a huge headache later on when searching for a specific photo set.
Keep in mind that neither of these programs are free. Both do offer a trial though. IDM give a 2 week trial, I think? It might have been a month, I really can not remember off hand. The keyboard remapper has a free trial that simply limits the number of macros you can store and use to 2. This really is not a big deal to me.
I found both programs at downloads.com and many more. I hope this link is okay to post Khan, if not I do apologize. This site offers a lot of program downloads for free and you only have to pay if the program you want requires you to pay to register it.
Do rejoin the site. The quality has improved greatly since it started. It is a site I intend on rejoining in the future.
|
08-13-08 01:53pm
|
Reply
795
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
Ouch!! Always start from the front! Best to get the good stuff first. Did you go in order of update date or the model name? I went the the model names since I renamed all the photo zips with the name included.
I only had any video issues with the higher bit rate stuff. i have seen this at many places. My computer that i use for HD video recording even has trouble with Windows Media Player when I try to skip around a video. Perhaps there is an issue with WMP being a wimp. Cant spell "wimp" with out "w,m,p!" :)
You will want to rejoin again sometime in the near future though. You dont want to miss the newer stuff. It looks nice. And of course the models have not gotten any uglier.
|
04-13-08 02:19pm
|
Reply
796
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
I hove not noticed anything bad about their content, nor is most of it exceptional. I was mostly just trying to let people know how much content there was. If it is worth downloading is another story I guess and is based on personal preference. Sometimes it is nice to know the size of a site.
|
03-22-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
797
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
wishdj's Review
Screaming! I dont much like screaming either. That is why I love the mute button. I nice moan can be so erotic though, but not screaming bloody murder as soon as she is touched?
|
03-20-08 07:26pm
|
Comment
798
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
|
03-10-08 05:46pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
799
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Loads of content, 300 GB
Pictures and Videos look nice
Girls are awesomely hot
Fast connections
No Download limit
Good design
Easy to download |
| Cons: |
Little expensive
Model name not included in zip file name
Could use more girl/girl content (my opinion)
Otherwise not much else to complain about! |
| Bottom Line: |
Other than the price, which seems to be becoming more common for better sites, the site is a no brainer. The zip files are not named with model's name in them so I do that manually which is a little annoying, but it is names relative to the gallery content.
Enough of the bad, all in all it is a great site. The quality is up to par in definition. The site is good sized too, as of mid March it was 300 GB plus about 16 GB of extra content. The videos look good, I believe the newer ones are at 3.62 Mbits/s, so basically DVD quality. The photos are in 1600x resolution for about 80% of the photo sets.
The speed here is as good as any premium site. I have been getting 2 M bytes/s today, but I am downloading elsewhere as well, so could be even faster. This site keeps my 3 Mbit/s home connection pegged 24/7 with no issues yet.
They have a nice model directory, and an update section so it would be easy to update your collection daily or wait a few months and resign up.
They use CCBill, which I like. They have never given me any issues and they give more information than some.
Don't miss out on this one! |
|
03-05-08 03:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
800
|
Office Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
london13's Review
Have you visited any sites in the past year that you did like? So far the only reviews you have posted have been 50's. This site is about user input good and bad. Tell us about some of the good sites you have visited. At this point all we can see is that you are someone who is impossible to please.
While those 50's might have been very much deserved by those two sites we just can not see that you are a fair judge of sites because we are only seeing the bad from you. Do not get discouraged, just even things out a little so that people can begin to understand who you are and what you look for in a site.
|
08-15-09 03:44pm
|
