| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
801
|
Old Man Tales
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Completely right.
This typically end up being deleted once the staff guys check the site after an hour or so.
Besides, he is likely just venting off some frustrations about something, although I would like to know what. A lot of times these guys never review anything else, so this review never counts into the scoring, which is the first thing you see when looking for anew site anyway.
Hopefully he will come back and tell us a little something before it gets deleted.
|
10-12-08 04:29pm
|
Reply
802
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
No "messy" food or bath goop! That sounds like a con to me. And it should be a con for you too. Just consider your name here, Drooler. It is only logical that someone named Drooler would like porn to get a little messy.
Seriously though, I am glad you mentioned that. Although you see it as a pro and I see it as a con it is still very useful information. We have seen too many bad trust votes thrown out because of tastes differences like we seem to share with messy food and bath goop when the reality is the information is good. So dont worry Drooler, I still trust your reviews despite the fact you do not like condiments with your porn.
|
08-02-09 12:32am
|
Comment
803
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
|
09-20-08 10:42pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
804
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Can say that I do. Just a good guess. Glad to see it is working now. I have this issue from time to time.
|
03-12-09 12:47am
|
Reply
805
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Uh oh...sounds like somebody is having a less than stellar day! Take a few breaths and try again, and let us know how it goes.
|
03-11-09 09:46pm
|
Reply
806
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Well Cybertoad, it does not matter how good the content is if you cant get it. I try to avoid sites if I know they will end up frustrating me. Please do not hold back in your reviews, we all want your honest opinion.
You make a good point that many of us have said before about bootlegging. All this ends up doing is screwing those of us who want to support porn industry. If many people find a site is too difficult to download it will end up pushing more people towards downloading the content illegally simply because it is so much easier.
|
11-12-08 10:52am
|
Reply
807
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Hummm....get pissed and beat on the keyboard. That is all the more I can tell you.
One last thing...my download manager is set to not begin downloading until it is told to, so when I click the video link it does not actually begin downloading. If you can set your manager this way, try queuing up a few without having them begin downloading. Or if you need to , start the download then pause it and see if you can move that way and resume the download. They told me that we should be able to resume downloads from their servers, but I was never able to. Anyway, try it with out automatically begining then set for a single download at a time...this works for other sites, but you never know......
I remember having issues, but not as bad as you are having from them. Perhaps they will get the message here sometime and make things a little easier for us paying members....this goes for all sites.
|
11-11-08 11:17pm
|
Reply
808
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
One thing to consider is queuing 3 files or without downloading anything. The have your manager download one at a time with a single connection. This did work for InfocusGirls, but you will not want to queue up a bunch since the links will expire after whatever amount of time. If this works at least you wont have to sit and wait for each and every video to download one at a time. Just a though.
|
11-11-08 12:50pm
|
Reply
809
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
I did not have that trouble with InFocusGirls. Is your manage using more than one connection per file for downloading? That is the only thing I can think of. InFocusGirls did limit the number of connections you could have and would not allow me to surf the site will maxed out. I believe I could get around 8 connections at a time though. I would get that same message. Unless they changed recently, you should be able to get more than one connection at a time.
|
11-10-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
810
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
linzi1's Review
Hello Linzi, welcome to PU. It is great to have new reviews, especially females.
What needs to be remembered about Only Tease is that it is a tease site after all. The fact the girls do not engage in anything too sexual and keep the cloths on more is the point of the site. I agree with you in wishing there was more, but the simple fact is they do deliver what they promise.
Another thing worth mentioning is that the pricing for this site sucks. Since they separated their sites it has gotten very expensive for anyone looking to see all their material.
|
06-08-09 06:54pm
|
Reply
811
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
ksauz's Comment
If when you say "samples" you mean you saw some freebies and did not actually join the site do keep in mind that what you have seen is all you will see here. This site is extremely softcore. The only way to get softer is to remove the nudity all together.
On the other hand, if you are into younger women taking their time stripping down, at least partially, then this site is definitely for you.
|
11-10-08 09:19pm
|
Comment
812
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
|
05-16-08 04:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
813
|
Only The Biggest
(0)
|
|
12-09-10 08:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
814
|
Party Wild Naked
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Nice catch on the "beg offer" they have. I do not always try to leave a site before joining to see what better deal they might beg me back with. I need to remember to do that.
Glad to know to stay away from this one.
|
05-27-09 03:46pm
|
Reply
815
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
paulmarkham's Reply
I would prefer not to use FLV. Not exactly my favorite file type. Any more you have to have good clarity in videos and picture. As a user that is a high priority when looking at a site that covers a common niche. If you had a more obscure niche then you could get away with lower quality, but that is not the case here. Quality sells!
|
07-22-08 02:20pm
|
Comment
816
|
Pee Lover
(0)
|
|
10-08-08 02:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
817
|
Pee Lover
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
That's what we are here for. Of the sites on the network this one is the most dedicated to ONLY peeing. Many of the others feature fisting and other things. Here it is pee and all the crazy things they could think of to do with it.
|
10-08-08 09:11am
|
Review
818
|
Pee Lover
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Network access
Good amount of videos
Many nice looking girls
More pee drinking here
Newer videos look nice
Site keeps even the oldest stuff
Do not need to log in a lot
Decent trial price
Several viewing options |
| Cons: |
Can only download one video at a time
Site expensive $35 per month
Videos are very short, most less than 2 minutes
Older videos are very low quality
Videos open new page, some older ones do not though
Files not names descriptively
No hardcore here, some blow jobs though |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is more about one and sometimes two girls peeing and being peed on. There is a lot more pee drinking and attention to that since it is only one person peeing on the girl.
This site has a of scenes to it but it is a small site to download. The whole site is just over 4 GB to download, but takes a lot time to queue up in a download manager. Each video opens up a new page that has to be closed out. You can not move around the site while a video is downloading either.
The video quality for the newer stuff is nice. It is 2400 KBit and 640 x 480. The older stuff is streaming only, of course this can be downloaded too. It is very low resolution 320 x 240 and as low as 338 KBit. This must be expected for older videos though.
They seem to update every two weeks, but they do not put dates on the videos, even in the updates section.
The oldest stuff in the updates section is pictures only. They are hardly worth mentions as they are very small. This is not a site for the picture fans.
I like this site a little better than some of the others on the network because it stays closer to what it is. It is a site about girls liking pee and that is what they do. Many scenes have girls peeing on themselves, having a guy or sometimes a girl pee in their pussy and the drinking it with a long tube. Most of the scenes have a guy peeing in the girls mouth, sometimes she swallows it and others she spits it out.
Pretty much every scene includes the girl peeing, typically in a glass. There is even a few lesbian scenes.
There is definitely a lot to choose from with about 300 different scenes. Each is a little different but can be a little repetitive.
If you enjoy girls peeing and being peed on, drinking pee, and even being peed in then this site is worth checking out. You will have to deal with a few nagging points, such as download difficulties and lower video quality, but all in all it is worth it. |
|
10-07-08 02:54pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
819
|
Pee Pee Galore
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Extreme content, piss drinking and such
-Have not seen content elsewhere
-Several download options and streaming, mpg, wmv, mov
-Access to a large number of sites on network
-Do not need to log in from day to day, nice if you use a download manager since your queue will not expire on you |
| Cons: |
-Site layout needs a bit of work
-Can not download more than one file at a time, you cant even move around the site while downloading
-A bit pricy
-Video quality could use some work, I have seen better -looking videos at 2300Kbit
-It opens a new page when trying to download a video
-Videos are segmented, most have two or three parts
-Videos have meaningless names (clip_2_wm2.mpg) for example. I would like to see(Sarah and Jane - Lesbians on the roof.mpg) or something at describes the video a little |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are into pee than this is a great place to start. There are a decent number of video here that you would find interesting.
Having access to the network is great because it gives you several other pee sites too and fisting if that is something you like.
The videos show some variety and are shot in different locations. One is a nice blonde with a wine bottle in a room full of kegs, of course peeing all over herself.
Many of the scenes are hardcore and feature both performers peeing one each other. Even a few lesbian and solo scenes too.
Even though you can only download one file at a time it should take too long to have the whole site. There is 10.3 GB of videos (if you download the largest size) and totals 61 files. Each is about 10 minutes long. The newer stuff is 640x480 and about 2300Kbit. I honestly have seen better quality even for that bit rate. The could really stand to increase that, I want to see the pee drops on her!
As with most porn now, the girls here are shaved for the most part. I prefer this though, but I thought I would mention it.
The do need to work on site navigation. The whole network looks the same and it can be confusing at times. I wish they had put dates on the videos, although they always say they are posting new updates they only show it for the whole network so it is hard to say how ofter each site is updated.
What it comes down to is do you want to see girls playing with pee and getting banged hard. If that is what you want to see today than put this site on your list of sites to consider. There is definitely some decent content here. |
|
09-23-08 01:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
820
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I really hate when sites do this. They do this for two reasons. One being they figure if you are canceling now than obviously they will not get any more of your so why give you more content. Secondly, if people realize that canceling early will discontinue their access immediately than they may be less likely to cancel in advance. Thus, people will be more likely to forget or miss the timing and end up paying for an additional month. Either way I feel it is a sneaky practice.
|
08-03-09 06:11pm
|
Reply
821
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
Does not sound too promising. Guess I will have to put them on my avoid list for now. Thanks for the review.
|
03-16-09 04:40pm
|
Comment
822
|
Pigtails Big Tits
(0)
|
|
01-19-09 08:57pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
823
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
bjorn7's Reply
I have noticed many site that have a few users that simply cant download at any reasonable sort of speed. Many times it is much slower than you are getting from them though. Sorry about your luck though!
|
04-14-08 03:30pm
|
Reply
824
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
topbucksGina's Reply
That would be fine...but he is not complaining about the time for a video, but rather the actual speed of his connection with your site. File size should have nothing to do with the speed. I get the idea that he is trying to download not stream anyway. 60 KB/sec is 60 KB/sec no matter if the file size is 10 MB or 10 TB it is all the same for speed. Downloading clips just means he has to spend more time clicking around? Many people dont like to stream anyway.
Also, no one cares if YOU get 800 KB/sec siting in the room next to the server. We all care about the speed to OUR house. If someone gets 3 MBit from every other site out there and yours falls far short there is an issue, and I somehow doubt it would be with the user that can get full speed everywhere else. Amazing speeds can be transmitted a few inches, but we need a thousand miles.
|
04-13-08 08:15pm
|
Reply
825
|
Pinky Lounge
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Damn Im good! Seriously though, great work investigating this one. Somehow it just seemed fishy too me. Think maybe someday these people will figure out that we do look at these reviews critically? Or that spam reviews end up making users worrisome about joining a particular site?
Edit:
Khan, I did not make any connection with guhe, but you have the records. I was actually suspecting that peterhd and caperuzo might be the same person or group. I was basing this off the similarity in the review, style, and grammar. Please take a moment to look into any correlation between these two users. Thanks!
|
06-04-09 11:10pm
|
