| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
951
|
Tear My Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Limited trial...hum! Thanks for the warning. The site might have changed that option since the site was reviewed last.
|
03-24-08 04:18pm
|
Reply
952
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Reply
Must agree here. Sites above a certain level, say 95, should be worth slaying a member for a long time.
Hard to give in the high 90s to a site that has members complaining about infrequent updates.
|
01-05-09 08:03pm
|
Reply
953
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Reply
I see you added some too, great! It is a bit easier to read, and we all tend to judge things by how the look at a glance. It looks nice now.
|
08-15-09 11:11pm
|
Reply
954
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
What happened?!?! The first part of this review was so easy to read and pleasant on the eyes. The bottom line was 14 lines of solid text! I am not saying anything at all about the content of the bottom line but a break or two would be very nice. This goes a long way to helping the reader out. It is very easy to lose place in a large block to text, at least for me it is, and if someone needs to look away for a moment it is difficult to find the position again. It does not change the content of the review at all, but it is a courtesy to the reader.
|
08-15-09 05:06pm
|
Reply
955
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
fugly's Comment
Did you try to get a hold of their tech support. It always seems like every site has a few unlucky users who simply can not get any speed for whatever reason. I was a member there some time ago and I recall them having excellent speed. Perhaps they would be willing to offer some sort of refund if you let them know of the issue.
|
06-25-08 06:57pm
|
Review
956
|
The Art Of Pee
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Trial works!
Stays in its niche
Quality good for price
Photos in zips
HD video
Models are attractive, not typical ugly pee models |
| Cons: |
Could use more content
Much more content!
Navigation could use a little work |
| Bottom Line: |
Site needs to grow a lot. Easy to download. Can be done easily during the trial period.
The videos are around 5 minutes long and the do offer HD videos at 4 MBit/s, some are 3 MBit/s. The resolutions are 720x540. There are very few photos, only 15 or so to a set and a small handful of sets.
The models are pretty on this site. Many peeing site have nasty looking girls, but they found nice looking girls for this.
This is a site I would love to see grow and if they do I would definitely rejoin in the future. Currently the content is worth the trial price if you like peeing. |
|
03-02-08 08:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
957
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Very large network
-Still updating
-A large variety of content
-Some videos in HD
-Most of navigation is very simple, there is a con I will mention later
-Offer several video download options
-No download limit
-No DRM
-Picture password is only 5 letters and easy to read, but also a con
-Most scenes have keywords
-Two day trial works and well worth it
-Billed through CCBill, this is a plus for me |
| Cons: |
-****Watch for CROSS SELL at bottom of sign up page, I had to scroll down to see it!****
-Pricy at $35 per month
-No zips
-Videos not named in a useful way "035HD.wmv"
-Are required to log in at seemingly random intervals anywhere from a few hours to a few days
-Download links expire when log in expires, but not all is lost, I will mention this again later
-They do require those retarded "guess the magic letters" pictures at the log in which screws up download managers from automatically logging in |
| Bottom Line: |
I just want to be clear that this review is for the network as a whole, not any individual site.
First I must say that there is a lot of content here. The site advertised over 750 GB which I believe is accurate. That 750 is assuming you download the largest file sizes and does not include that smaller duplicate files. I did not download this whole network, I know I know, it is out of character for me. However, I did download 612 GB of it so I can give you a fair representation of what you can expect.
This network offers a number of different niches and some of them are pretty unique. The anal smoothie is certainly exclusive and the videos of the girls prepping for the scenes is not usual either. While I do not think everyone will like this, I find it to be a nice touch.
Let talk about the videos themselves for a moment. Some of them look like old VHS tapes, likely because that is where they came from, and others look up to par with some of the better video sites. Golden Hardcore features porn from the 70's and similar times when the technical quality simply was not there and that must be expected. Much of the newer videos are shot in HD and look wonderful, as they should when they are as large as 2 GB in size!
I do have to be honest here, the pictures were nothing special but they were not bad for a network. I did not download any of the pictures because they did not offer zips and the hassle seemed to out weight the prize. Normal I would download them too, but I had a lazy spell.
Logging into the site is a bit annoying. Every time you log in it takes you to the network page where you pick the site you want. A new window opens and then you pick videos or pictures. So you have to refind your position every time you get logged out.
Another annoyance is that you can not navigate back to the network page from the individual sites, it seems to be a one way street. So you need to keep the network page's tab open as well as a tab for the site you are working on.
For those using a download manager, I use IDM. When you queue up a bunch of downloads there is a possibility of them stopping, even mid download, when your log in expires. Do not fret though. There is a random string of junk at the beginning of the URL, simply replace it with the new and resume your download. :)
Quicky Rundown
Size: Claims 750 GB, I believe it
Video: 640x480 @ 2.41 MBit to 1920x1080 at 7.47 MBit and everywhere in between
Average video size: About 500 MB
Size Range: 6 MB up to 2 GB, even spread
I downloaded 1600 videos with that 612 GB
Join this site? Yes or No?
Overall, YES.
Watch some trailers first, if you like what you see than go for it. But, only for a month. Get what you want and get out, it simply cost too much to hang around long. If there is only a few things of interest go for the full access trial.This network has a mix for great and terrible, you just have to weed through it.
Happy Hoarding! |
|
08-24-09 09:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
958
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
|
|
07-21-09 03:02am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
959
|
The Pussy Licker
(0)
|
Reply of
Sextigerchen's Review
Hummm...I thought all the orgasms in porn were fake?
|
12-02-08 12:49pm
|
Reply
960
|
The Rubber Clinic
(0)
|
Reply of
Basil445's Reply
One solution is to not use DRM. It offers much less protection than you think. I looked at the site and was interested, but will not be signing up because of the DRM.
|
03-03-12 02:22pm
|
Reply
961
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Haha. Dont worry, I am sure they will get it fixed for you. I am not a perfectionist, shown very easily by more porn collection organization. I have stuff scattered everywhere, although it is betting a little better. I guess I am usually more worried about getting my stuff to work right and when I see something little at a free site I do not put much worry on it. Of course if I had all my stuff in order I might be more willing to give others a hard time! :)
|
09-25-08 02:47pm
|
Reply
962
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I do not usually look to much at the scores. I feel that at times they are weighed one way or another too much by people who are biased either direction.
Hopefully he sees his name and says "hey thats me!" I guess it really is not a big deal though, I did not even know the feedback history page was there until you mentioned it.
Anyway, glad I could make it make sense for you.
|
09-25-08 02:33pm
|
Reply
963
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
This is something that perhaps you should talk to Khan about. The one review was a year old and thus does not count as much toward the final score. You are correct though, the feedback history page is not showing everything.
Here it is:
The old review is a year old, thus it counts as 25%
The newer review counts as 100% still
Newer review score times 4 plus the older review score and divide all by 5 since there is five parts to the score. Much like calculating a students GPA
95*4+90=470
470/5=94 ---the displayed score
I hope this helps a bit. They do need a line on the feedback page to count the number of older reviews.
|
09-25-08 10:37am
|
Reply
964
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
A few weeks ago PU staff sent use a newsletter. The newsletter explained that as a review gets older it becomes less of an impact on the scoring of a site. So if a review was a year old it would not be weighted the same as a review that was three days old.
The point is that an old review may still hold some merit, but the newer review would be much more trustworthy (assuming all else equal) than the older one simply because the older one can not account for any changes over the last year or whatever.
This change was made at the same time as they began to allow us to update reviews. Which is nice because many of us like to revisit sites every six months or whatever. Now we can keep everything a little more up to date.
It was a good catch, so this proves that you are at least half paying attention. You can read about these changes on the bottom of the homepage in the news section. I believe it is the most current newsletter.
|
09-24-08 06:17pm
|
Review
965
|
Tina Doll
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Full Access Trial
Nice natural tits
Photos zipped
Access to Alyssa Doll
Model is pretty cute
Navigation simple but site looked good |
| Cons: |
Videos are rather small
No updates
Only seven videos, a very short lived site
Normal price very hight for amount of content
Photos not large either
Only one download option for the videos, all seven of them! |
| Bottom Line: |
Tina is a cute girl with natural breasts. She has a certain look about her that can be appealing. She is not a pornstar looking girl, but rather more like a girl you might see at the mall or on a college campus.
The photos are in the range of 682x1024. The site is mostly comprised of the photos. There are 62 sets that total 762 MB.
In many of the photo sets Tina makes some pretty strange faces during the shoot, almost like she is trying too hard. You know the face a girl sometimes gives when you finally talk her into flashing you and she feels a little embarrassed yet naughty at the same time.
The videos are 320x240 and at 512 KBit/s which is very crappy. Each of the seven videos is 18-19 MB totalling for 126 MB.
Each video is about 5 minutes long and consists of Tina stripping down and that is about it. There is no real masturbation of anything.
Overall this is a very small and abandoned site that is not even a GB in size. The only reason it is worth checking out is as the trial, otherwise it is simply too expansive for the lack of content. This is definitely not a site to count on to beef up your porn collection. Since it has not been updated in a very long time I would not be looking for any sort of multi-month memberships deals to save month. Hell you should be able to download this on in less than an hour!
I joined this site through Alyssa Doll. I did not notice it advertised except for a comment here on PU. The user name and password are the same for both sites. Alyssa Doll is a bit bigger and worth checking out during your trial.
Also worth mentioning. The trial did not seem to be limited. I was able to download all the zip files. So perhaps this has changed since the last mention of this site here. |
|
01-24-09 11:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
966
|
Tiny Tabby
(0)
|
Reply of
Murkk's Review
Is this site updating at all? Or was it one of those weekend wonders that jump ship after a few hours of work?
|
05-26-09 10:04am
|
Reply
967
|
Tiny's Black Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Exactly!
6 Videos per day limit is practically committing piracy suicide! Reality kings has a limit of 15 per day which I thought was bad enough. This is a definite turn off when it comes to making your porn money count. I am with on saying they will not see my money with those sort of limits in place.
Another thing i hate about daily limits is that if you are away for a day you give up those downloads. Also, many of these places that limit the amount of videos are actually limiting the amount of attempts. So if your download stops for whatever reason you lose that attempt. Any site that wishes to limit the amount of videos a user can download should at least allow them to roll over and keep track of the last few videos being downloaded so that they can resume the download if need be without being ripped off.
|
01-15-09 08:47am
|
Reply
968
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
That sounds like a tall order there! If yo do not eget an answer you could always try emailing the webmaster, they might be willing to tell you.
|
03-13-09 02:39pm
|
Reply
969
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Oh wow. That was six years ago. I really do not remember now. Glimpseit was a recent find for me though that might just be what you are looking for.
|
04-27-14 09:56am
|
Reply
970
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
The " " in the middle of the url is not actually there. I had to break the link up because the posting kept trying to put ... in the middle of it to make it look shorter. The trouble was that it was cutting out the important part that you needed to be able to see. Other wise it looked like this "http://sb8x6261.members.twistys.com/updates?offset=-30&offsetmode=2" which is no good!
|
07-05-10 01:50pm
|
Comment
971
|
Twistys
(0)
|
|
07-05-10 01:45pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
972
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
bootsulike's Reply
Go with Twistys. The videos a much better and they update a lot more than DDG. A lot of the DDG videos spend 70% of the time fading from one screen to another so you do not get many clear shots.
|
04-29-10 02:17pm
|
Reply
973
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Damn it! Now you have tempted me to rejoin with that Amy Reid content you just HAD to post!!! ;)
Just curious, how much exclusive content do you have of her? Please tell me some insanely large number!
Oh and yes, the guy who started this whole series of posts obviously confused twistys for Twinkies or some other gay site. That is the only reason I can find for someone coming down so hard on a site featuring such great women, he must have been hoping for men!
|
01-25-09 01:14am
|
Reply
974
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Now be nice Drooler...we need to be entertained every now and then. :)
I know this is from a pretty old posting, but it still cracks me up.
|
01-25-09 01:08am
|
Reply
975
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
She does have a nice solo site. The newer stuck looks pretty good. Plus, that girl is amazingly hot. Even the fake boob hates might want to actually consider checking her out. Her's look pretty good, and she has the cutest face.
Thanks for the heads up PinkPanther.
|
10-09-08 06:30pm
|
