| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
He he, don't worry, you're not a creepo just a human being with natural thoughts and feelings (including guilt, apparently). But what's worse, hiding your filth collection or hiding your "contraband"? I think either way if you died and a family member was going through your things there would be the inevitable "Oh, dear..." moment of embarrassment as they quietly headed to the the nearest dumpster. Plus, it's one more thing to worry about every time you move--talk about sensitive items! : - 0
I wonder how women feel about their toy contraband? I guess in their case it's a little more understandable since a hand and a couple of paper towels are not always enough for a little quick relief. Then again there are some creative and crazy sex toy designs out there just for female pleasure but the end result should still be the same, right?
|
07-13-10 03:53pm
|
Reply
352
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, definitely. Without corrective eyewear I'm practically blind so I am trying to get as much girl "watching" in as I can before I go totally blind. Though I am sure people would claim that if I stopped a few things I won't go blind...
I also get a kick out of catching other guys be far, far less subtle in their ogling than myself--hilarious, and it makes me feel like a real gentleman (though I am anything but)!
|
07-07-10 03:27pm
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Of course not. : - )
|
07-04-10 07:27pm
|
Reply
354
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
If I read a review it's more to figure out what the movie's about rather than whether it's any good or not, and I'd expect many read them for similar reasons. Plus, a lot of critics' tastes are, well, not that popular to begin with; they swoon over artsy independent foreign films that play in only a handful of theaters in the entire country, but dismiss popcorn features that go on to break sales records.
I will say in their defense that the ones who review for more mainstream news outlets tend to drop the whole if-your-a-parent act. Nothing I hate more than to read a review that sounds as if young children are the norm for what a film should contain.
|
07-02-10 05:16pm
|
Reply
355
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Wouldn't the price of Coca-Cola go up, since they have to pay for all that promotion? Considering they are the planet's most ubiquitous brand I would imagine they spend a pretty penny to maintain their lead in the market.
|
06-24-10 02:55pm
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I hate them, but if they are kept to just the welcome/opening page then it's okay, or for a sister site that's owned by the same company, but otherwise I get pissed since I have paid for the site, not advertising.
|
06-24-10 02:52pm
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, way too much. Sorry, but I can't keep my big mouth/word processor shut.
|
06-18-10 08:32pm
|
Reply
358
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks, that answers my curiosity perfectly!
Yeah, I should have specified girl-girl or girls-only hardcore, not boy-girl hardcore--which I am not very interested in--and this site sounds like it fits that bill really well (or fit on a future credit card really well...). Can't wait to be a member, and thanks again for responding.
|
06-17-10 12:22pm
|
Reply
359
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Exotics, I know it's been more than six months since your review but you're the latest actual reviewer, so how soft or hard is this site exactly? I was wondering because Cap'n made some comments about it being listed under softcore when it looks to be more explicit than that.
I'm just curious because I don't like stripping and posing--it's just too boring for me--so anything you can remember would help, thanks!
|
06-16-10 06:37pm
|
Reply
360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
It's all about consent for me; how 'rough' or 'abusive' something is comes secondary to whether or not a person even wants it (both giving and receiving). I'm certainly willing to give--well, try at least, I'm a humanist and not very much into hurting others--if there is a person who is willing to receive and enjoys it.
Porn is obviously different; it's fantasy and we assume that it's completely consensual as well so we shouldn't feel too guilty about more "abusive acts."
|
06-16-10 12:25pm
|
Reply
361
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Sorry I missed your review when you posted it the other day. Man, what a score--a healthy 95! Though I would argue if a few sites should be in the 90s this could be one of them (okay, I gave it an 87, but I'm a frugal bastard and I'm a stickler for low pricing). I do think you get what you pay for though, even if you spend half your membership trying to recover from your hot girl-high after first joining. I can't say this has universal appeal but it has a little something for nearly everyone into basic girl-only porn; softcore posing, girl-girl, big butts/lips/smiles/cracks, to a kind of up close nastiness that would make Larry Flynt blush (in envy).
Great review!
(And I am pretty sure you meant to say you would fill your hard disk not "desk"? I think if anything this sight would make you fill your desk with spare tissues and paper towels... ; - ) )
|
06-15-10 12:49pm
|
Reply
362
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Lol! I bet you would volunteer! I wonder if it could ever be considered community service, because if it's on the Internet it serves the global community...of loyal perverts. : - )
|
06-15-10 12:38pm
|
Reply
363
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Several times a week is "frequent" enough for me. Hey, even pornographers need the weekend off. : - )
|
06-14-10 10:51am
|
Reply
364
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Guilty, your honor. : - )
|
06-10-10 11:48am
|
Reply
365
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Yes, quite a few times, but then again there are plenty of fans for every type of crazy shit you can think up, so who I am to judge them? At the same time there are plenty of people who hate the crazy shit I like, so who are they to judge me? Having said that I am fascinated by the creativity and dedication (best words I can think of describe it) to the crazier stuff out there. And it's probably making at least a couple people very happy, so what's the big deal?
All I ask is that people don't bother me in my interests and I won't have a problem with them.
|
06-10-10 11:47am
|
Reply
366
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I am not exactly secretive about my reverence for porn, at least with my friends--hell, they all knew I was a perverted creep the moment they met me--but I haven't mentioned PU yet, and I don't think I will. My writing would probably give me away and then they would eventually get greedy and end up breaking into my home to steal my hard drives!
Maybe I'm nuts, but I'm keeping it to myself for now.
|
06-09-10 10:32pm
|
Reply
367
|
N/A
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
In America, at least outside of Nevada, you probably have a far greater chance of being arrested.
|
06-08-10 04:17am
|
Reply
368
|
N/A
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
I would be more worried about being the victim of a crime than being arrested for an alleged crime. Besides, prostitution isn't heavily outlawed in many countries, though stay clear of the Middle East.
|
06-07-10 01:39pm
|
Reply
369
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Condoms, condoms, condoms! But bring your own that you have purchased yourself--no point in just winging it or playing by ear. Even if you're not going to have sex yourself, just give them out as a form of humanitarian aid, since quite a few countries seem to have a hangup with them.
|
06-06-10 03:18pm
|
Reply
370
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Swallower--spitting just seems so rude.
|
06-04-10 11:46am
|
Reply
371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
That might only protect gay porn...or sites like [ignore]Rentboy.com[/ignore]! ;-)
At most Obama can only be president through 2017, after which the U.S. may have another Jesus freak in charge. We've done it before, there's no reason we couldn't do it again. That being said, I don't think they would be able to outlaw it totally, at least not at a federal level where social legislation gets iffy (except for gay marriage, which apparently just needs a constitutional amendment!). But I wouldn't be surprised if a few states, or just, say, California, loosen their porn laws to what they are in much of Europe and that as a result there would then be outrage from the right as well as 'real America' for new federal legislation.
Think about what happened with Traci Lords in the '80s and as a result now every American video and site has to have the text about how all the performers were at least 18 at the time of shooting. Imagine if a video had some fisting in it and there was no response from the state courts (it would most likely be from California or Florida). The numbnut lawmakers in the U.S. Congress get all upset and huffy that no state laws are in place to reign in 'morals and values' and propose federal legislation to deal with it! After a serious exchange of hot air in the media shoutosphere it's eventually decided that the federal government really can't enact laws about certain content, and as a result a number of states create their own laws and then thereafter every video and site has to include another warning about what states outlaw such material! :-(
|
05-27-10 11:46am
|
Reply
372
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Comment
I have always gotten speedy downloads from ITC, even when downloading multiple huge files at once, so it's nice to hear you are now getting in on the 'action' like many other members. They have some seriously large HD video files so fast downloads are pretty critical to enjoying their content.
|
05-26-10 10:20pm
|
Reply
373
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Reply
Minus the chest, she doesn't look all that bad, but to call those breasts "unnatural" is an understatement. She must have some incredibly strong back muscles and bone structure to support all that mass. Finding clothing must be a bitch too. I guess if you're looking for the biggest you won't do much better...
|
05-25-10 07:02pm
|
Reply
374
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I "scan briefly" and watch out for any pre-checked boxes (always suspicious in my view, regardless of whether or not it's porn).
|
05-25-10 09:31am
|
Reply
375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I voted "Go get a reality check." as I don't know why I'd be in a bar in the first place. But if I was in a bar for some reason I would still get the reality check for seeing a porn star.
|
05-24-10 12:51am
|
