| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
If they're going to have smaller cocks then they might as well not be able hold their fire through half hour super-boners either, if a "more 'real' or relatable" feel is the goal. Oh, and they don't get to do all the crazy contortionist positions and acts we civilians can only dream about (and even then it's kinda hard), all with average-looking girls only--no super honeys.
C'mon, it's porn, it's fantasy! Yeah, I wish I was more relatable to the actor, not the other way around, but if I really want a more realistic experience then I'll go and watch some amateur stuff or just turn off the video altogether and get rejected in person. :(
Plus, porn should be attracting the well-endowed as sex is pretty much the whole focus, and the penis is crucial to boy-girl sex. It would be like asking professional basketball teams to not be recruiting so many tall guys, or beauty pageants to stop using so many beautiful women.
|
03-04-10 05:09pm
|
Reply
427
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Laptops are incredibly handy but I prefer desktops; better keyboard, monitor, with lots of upgradeability.
|
02-24-10 02:20pm
|
Reply
428
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'd like to but I simply don't have the time or the patience to de-douchebag the countless videos in my collection that lose focus of the people who are actually in front of the camera not the snickering drooling horn dogs (no offense, Drooler) off to the side.
What I'd would really love to do is get the raw footage and edit that down. I bet I could make a far more enjoyable or at least faster paced cut without all the bullshit I normally sit through. I'm an impatient guy and I get it already; she's stripping but she eventually needs to get fully naked and cut down on all the "ooos" and "ahhs" poses. I can fantasize pretty well on my own and a lot of these girls are probably nursing hangovers or coming down from some pretty mean highs so they don't need to act as if they are having their best orgasm ever, especially multiple times in the same video.
Oh, and one more thing: whoever edits hardcore videos, please--I beg of you!--stop intercutting with a shot of the dude's face in pure ecstasy/agony (it's kinda hard to tell) as he launches his fireworks show, okay? You don't need to show me him whacking his way to victory for five minutes either but I don't need his contorting facial expression to 'get' the scene. Though the female orgasm may be a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma guys' orgasms are not that hard to figure out when you see them onscreen, so get rid of his fucking face shots.
|
02-22-10 03:54pm
|
Comment
429
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
02-20-10 02:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
430
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
At $35 for U.S.-based perverts I would say this site is on the high end of the price spectrum, at least for a monthly rate of a single site, but rejoining only every so often I would say it's worth it. But $47.81 is really pushing it even for the quality of the heart-stoppingly hot honeys who step in front of their cameras.
Whatever you do I would not recommend sending cash though, you just might have to calm down and wait a while. : (
|
02-20-10 02:41pm
|
Reply
431
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Great review, Wittyguy. I agree this is one of the better rear entry action sites out there, considering how widespread spreading the ass wide open is (I think I picked up too much wit from your review ;) ). I also think it's one of the better sites of the 21st Sextury network, especially with all the hardcore action going on at the other sites. Zoliboy now has a lot of boy-girl hardcore but it's not always anal and has its own crazy fetishes to fulfill as well.
I don't get the way they do photos either; they are obviously professionally shot and high quality except that they are so tiny. I don't think any site should release photos (besides thumbnails) that are smaller than their current video resolution and should really makes them significantly bigger.
Simply can't go wrong in your butt?! I'll take your word for it...
|
02-19-10 02:47pm
|
Reply
432
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I would love to say never cancelled but I don't want to risk burning out on one site so I cancel and then wait for fresh filth to build up and then rejoin six months or so down the line to load up my hard drives again.
|
02-18-10 12:02pm
|
Reply
433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
And you have a loving partner too--you never forgot about her, right? ; )
|
02-17-10 08:24pm
|
Reply
434
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I was a little worried you had some insider information, plus since you have terabytes of porn I figured you would still have plenty to 'do' if PU bit the dust.
|
02-16-10 06:37pm
|
Reply
435
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
I would use the same approach I take whenever I lose or accidentally delete data: "Cry and beg them to come back!" and probably cry some more. If I cry over pretty much everything but spilled milk (and even then it depends on the situation) I sure as hell am going to cry when my community of loyal perverts is shut down. : )
|
02-16-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
436
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Doesn't the rest of the world get pissed when we Americans use the term football for what's played at the Super Bowl and soccer for what everyone else calls football?
: )
|
02-12-10 05:38pm
|
Reply
437
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I would say that your first paragraph can also apply to men, though I bet most of us are far too 'manly' to admit it.
I am not saying men and women are alike in this regard but I think, at least in the West, that cultures have some pretty screwed up ideas about sexuality or at least in terms of how rigidly we feel we have to define it.
For example, If you are a male heterosexual then there is a sort of list of unwritten rules that you are expected to follow with the opposite sex, and engaging in a number of activities--even solely with the opposite sex--is strictly forbidden. Just think of the number of times you've dismissed something as 'gay' despite the fact that it would be with someone of the opposite sex. Wouldn't a man doing something with a woman already be defined as straight?
The same is true of women and homosexuals, though I would argue gays are a little more open minded as few societies in the modern world truly accept gay people as equally as they do straight people and thus they are not as worried about what rules and norms they are expected to follow in order to please the society.
But back to the question, I would say "Only a few are" but defining "few" very loosely as I don't think anyone knows about "all women" and the question is a little absolute in that regard. Maybe I'm just fantasizing here, but I am sure there at least a few who are truly comfortable with both men and women and wouldn't have it any other way, but the vast majority would define their sexuality as either gay or straight.
|
02-10-10 05:18pm
|
Reply
438
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
It's not called the 'girlfriend experience' for nothing; people want as much 'service' as their money can get them, though I am not sure what Ashley Dupree-type rates get you beyond a job resignation.
I wonder if girls can demand higher rates in porn when the guy is wearing a condom? Probably not though as condom-ed sex in porn would risk a smaller audience than the typical bareback-and-free style.
|
02-08-10 11:30pm
|
Reply
439
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
"Sometimes" as HIV/AIDS is not the only threat to our "favorite porn starlets" sadly enough. : (
One of my favorites from ALS, Melissa Ashley, has suffered through ovarian cancer and now possibly faces cervical cancer as well. As a result she has spent quite a bit of time in hospitals as well has having some major organs removed--all while struggling to secure the funds needed to pay for it out of pocket since health care is apparently a privilege, not a right.
Back to the original question; yes, I do feel concerned that any one of my favorites could contract HIV/AIDS or any other STD out there but there is plenty of shit that seems to end or ruin the lives of the young and horny. Drugs, car accidents, angry partners, and health problems like the one I mentioned above all take their toll, though STDS are arguably the most easily preventable, at least in theory since condoms aren't exactly what a lot of porn audiences like to see.
|
02-08-10 11:23pm
|
Reply
440
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
"Just not my thing."
I don't understand the appeal of watching what should essentially be warm up acts--the blow jobs, hand jobs, etc.--turned into the main act itself. Messemer asked about things being stupid and boring when stretched out over twenty minutes but I think it's just weak content that isn't exactly, shall we say, 'complete'--it's missing the main course!
This is really one of the those things that may be fun experiencing in real life (at least on the receiving end) but there is no fun in watching it, probably not even if it was you in the video. You are watching someone do what is basically a fluffer's job with their clothes off.
|
02-07-10 06:49pm
|
Reply
441
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
"[T]heir ankles up around their ears." Around their ears? Ouch! :0
|
02-05-10 10:45pm
|
Reply
442
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I'm still worried about the mainstreaming of porn. Don't get me wrong; I want all the legal and social protections possible but I don't necessarily want everyone into it as much I am. I think this ends up making porn more generic and also more stupider--think BangBros and you might understand what I'm getting at.
Part of what I like about porn is that it is not totally accepted or at least not totally loved by the society at large. Granted this has its risks like legal snafus and restrictions that end up negatively affecting other parts of society but I still like to think that I am part of a small but strong minority rather than just another big meaningless group. This is probably why I can't stand things like Playboy or porn awards and sales figures.
I guess this means porn really hasn't changed my attitude of even the most attractive females I meet because you don't know whether the subject of porn or a viewpoint influenced by it is going to get you a nice warm hug or a swift punch in the face.
|
02-05-10 10:57am
|
Reply
443
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ezride's Reply
I say there's a huge difference between watching an actress 'act' in a serious or semi-serious role and seeing her masturbate or get pounded like a jackhammer, and this is regardless of whether or not she is attractive. Whether the girls who do all their fucking on screen are acting or not is kind of irrelevant when it's almost guaranteed that audiences are going to have different reactions watching porn compared to the ones they have when they watch non-porn entertainment.
In any event the question was more about your attitude towards attractive women you meet, not necessarily about meeting bona fide porn talent like Monahan apparently has (lucky bastard!).
|
02-05-10 10:47am
|
Reply
444
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I'm not sure, but "Don't get your hopes up, pervert" and "She's probably not into that" are two thoughts that frequently enter my mind.
|
02-04-10 11:35am
|
Reply
445
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Sorry, don't like uniforms. My fantasies are too imaginative for the boundaries of a "uniform!" :)
|
02-02-10 07:01pm
|
Reply
446
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Thanks, and yeah it's long, pretty soon I'm going to have to sit on exotics4me's couch and discuss my addiction to writing long reviews. I swore to myself that I would try and keep this one short...
|
02-01-10 10:53am
|
Reply
447
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
(Bottom Line continued. Sorry my reviews are getting so long.)
Also Simon (assuming he does all the shooting) frequently shoots short depths-of-field, meaning not a lot of the photo is in focus, so focused face but not ass, or focused ass but not face, but not a lot of both if the model is on her back or stomach. Other sites do this but it seemed to be very apparent here for some reason and it can get annoying. Clean sets and proper lighting seemed to used in almost all photos though older shoots seem to have shots thrown in that should have been deleted, like everything is out of focus, a flash didn’t fire, or something else, but for some reason they are there. I also found one little problem that irritated me in some sets; dust on the sensor. This happens in digital photography in between lens changes when dust gets on the camera’s image sensor and shows up in every photo (usually in the same exact place) until cleaned off. It sounds insignificant but to me it just seems unprofessional when everything else is done professionally (lighting, sets, verifying the model’s age).
If your looking for videos you should keep looking as a lot of models have none and those that do may only have two or three, but not one for every photoset. Older videos are smaller, around 480 x 360 .mpgs @700kb/s, but again not in great quantity so don’t get your hopes up. Not once did I ever hear or see Simon or any other male help for that matter, so it makes for a lesson in restraint to all the hands-on two cents-adding douches out there who want to ruin my video, uh, ‘experience.’ The girls are often shy and quiet too, and since they claim the orgasms are never forced none of the models really get that vocal or overly physical when masturbating but they seemed happy and I wasn’t complaining.
If SS really get their act together and release bigger photos with the links improved and videos for every model then they can get a score in the 80s, but until then members will have to put up with the relative narrow reach of their current and fully archived content; almost entirely solo girls (girl-girl is rare), many of them amateur, armed with lots of toys.
|
01-31-10 10:16pm
|
Reply
448
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Just to second Drooler's opinion here, yes the majority of the models start off clothed, though getting naked with a toy at the ready can be done pretty quickly. The videos don't waste a lot a time and many of them (of what videos there are) start naked.
Overall you see plenty of lingerie and clothing before the 'real' action starts.
|
01-31-10 08:21pm
|
Reply
449
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Hmm...you know, to be honest I never noticed them in all the years I have ogled at Hustlers. You learn something new everyday.
|
01-31-10 07:41pm
|
Reply
450
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Wow, three members who have admitted to not having cell phones...I like PU more every day!
I know the iPad is coming but I am still not sure how people are going to easily haul it around like a cell phone. Oh, and wasn't it designed for reading books, not checking out the newest porn video? ;)
|
01-31-10 01:52pm
|
