| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Review
Great review, LPee23!
I'm not sure 100 would be appropriate for any site, but if you can fit your viewing habits into ALS' particular niche and how they capture it then why not go all the way? I just know that since giving it a score of 97 way back when that I've grown bored over their approach and really disappointed over their use of boy-girl content, no matter how limited.
Oh, how the mighty (and shaven) have fallen! :-(
|
04-26-14 07:08pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Barefoot, please.
I'm not a foot fetishist beyond preferring clean feet, and I've just never found high heels particularly sexy; looks like an elaborate game of dress up that I have in no way ever fantasized about. I guess it's because in real life the women I'm around don't wear heels and it's frankly the last thing I'm looking at anyway. (Though far less incriminating that getting caught drooling over cleavage.)
Put on a pair of tall leather boots (no cowboy boots or Uggs, damn it!) and I might actually notice footwear.
|
04-26-14 06:21pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Sucks that Seymore had to waste his time and money on that case, especially considering that there was plenty of this and even harder content on American sites by then, but apparently DVDs are sacred media.
I seem to remember reading that most of the jury who had to watch the offending scene at trial--you know, "evidence"--were more bored than offended, plus it's something you have to seek out to really get all worked up about. Of course that's how so many of the concerned moralists of the world work; leaving no stone unturned until at least one fragile person finds something offensive.
|
04-21-14 03:12pm
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Not often, since I assume most models wouldn't actually play drums or guitar buck naked, though I'd imagine the best use of a flute or recorder is for a women to masturbate with.
|
04-17-14 11:28pm
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yeah, I remember a few fleeting moments of android-assisted pleasure followed by unstoppable Yul Brynner murderousness--we've been warned!
Of course such things never seemed to have stopped anybody once they get an erection, though count me out as I'm still having nightmares from this fucking insane Japanese robot mouth of terror.
|
04-14-14 06:58pm
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I was watching something recently that was shot only a few months ago with Amber Rayne, and I guess I'd kinda forgotten she's been in the business for nine years now. And amazingly in that time--a veritable eternity in porn careers--she's bucked the trend of so many veteran performers and hasn't destroyed her body, gotten married, or softened her performances one bit! :-)
|
04-10-14 08:52pm
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'd say 2-3 years for their actual career, but longer lasting fanbase with the web and its trove of archived material. How many of us have "discovered" a performer only to learn she did a few scenes and has not been in anything in months or even years?
And of course we have the outliers like the amazing [ignore]Nina Hartley[/ignore] who's had the longevity of a male porn star--without the creepiness.
|
04-10-14 03:53pm
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
A part of me hopes that Hillary Clinton stays away from the 2016 presidential race, if just to get Joe Biden to run instead and hear some more of his priceless gaffes. He's like that uncle at Thanksgiving who's had a little too much to drink...except he's the Vice President.
"Big fucking deal" indeed! :-)
|
04-05-14 07:46pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
I second jberryl69's comment; might as well get one more in before you're incinerated by one of their high tech death rays (if they can travel across galaxies then they must have death rays).
Aliens landing at the White House reminds me of Independence Day, and if I remember correctly they destroy most of the major cities including the one I'm living in now.
|
04-04-14 08:19am
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Woodruff's Poll
Considering that her "one hardcore/bj performance" wouldn't be with me...never! :-(
If anything I've not rejoined a site because it turned hardcore, even if only for a few scenes.
|
04-02-14 04:12pm
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Somewhat anti-social, in both real life and online.
I don't Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Tinder, Chatroulette, etc., and am probably won't anytime soon. Obviously I'm pretty happy to be here on PU, but I just can't share that with everyone in real life, while the sheer ignorance and knee-jerk prejudices of more mainstream sites make my blood boil. Personally I just get more out of socializing in real life than looking up old classmates (why would I want to reconnect with all assholes who made school so shitty?) or see newborn baby pics (I simply don't care about your children), though I do have my limits.
I guess this means I'm introverted because being around other people constantly, especially in bigger groups, just gets exhausting after a while and I need some time to "decompress/recharge" on my own. If you're an outgoing social person this can be hard to see as not weird and even harder to explain. And it certainly doesn't help that there now seem to be social groups for people and their interests that I always thought were, at least in part, to get away from bullshit traditional social obligations--atheist "churches" are the most blatant example. Does everything require a community?
A quote from the movie Heat sums up my feelings: "I'm alone, I am not lonely."
|
03-31-14 08:07pm
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
If a model was only doing softcore than she wasn't my favorite anyway--probably not even on my radar.
|
03-29-14 09:06am
|
Reply
63
|
Wired Pussy
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review, rearadmiral!
Can't say I'm a fan of this niche, as it seems to be more about what someone is feeling than can ever really be shown in porn, but Kink has always piqued my curiosity to say the least. And the now dormant Pissing.com made some lovably deviant material in its time.
They do seem to be in love with longer scene lengths on other sites, so maybe that's the reason behind "the lack of 1920x1080." I assume that's the case with this site as well, because you just don't want a 1080i download of an hour-plus long scene.
|
03-23-14 03:33pm
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd like to think I'm smarter than average but show me a couple of well edited teaser videos and I can easily make some stupid decisions. So I'd say I'm pickier than average because I'm pretty specific about what I like and don't like in porn, regardless of the current trends.
A lot of the "mainstream" stuff just bores the hell out of me and is largely a turnoff, not to mention the growing celebrified aspect of porn stars with inane Twitter feeds and convention appearances. And I find the current porn star look--swollen lips, sculpted breasts, Cleopatra makeup, and "girly" tattoo--absurdly unattractive and only vaguely sexual at best.
|
03-23-14 01:38pm
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Depends on the girl.
My Fair Lady's Eliza Doolittle-esque cockney accent isn't exactly my idea of a beautiful voice, but not all English accents are that bad. Some American ones can be frightening--New York and New Jersey come to mind--while others like Southern accents can go either way.
|
03-21-14 07:55am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
"Yes, maybe"...then I watched it and my nausea told me otherwise! Curiosity killed the cat, and the porn hound.
However, first coming across porn when I was younger definitely developed my interest in the illicit arts! The fetishes seem to have been hardwired in me already, I just had to find depictions of them.
|
03-20-14 07:49am
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use Firefox's built-in blocker and it works reasonably well, minus the annoying "Please Take Our Survey!" shit a lot of otherwise legitimate sites dump on you.
Unfortunately I've found NoScript a time-consuming add-on, even if eventually effective. But my favorite add-on (though it doesn't affect pop-ups) is the free AdBlocker Plus for Firefox--no more ads in streaming videos!
|
03-17-14 05:54pm
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Glad to hear it, graymane! :-)
|
03-15-14 08:15pm
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
With regards to whom I've had sex with, I'd consider myself straight. But then I also hate sports, enjoyed Brokeback Mountain, and am not viscerally enraged by two men kissing in public, or really doing anything else for that matter.
The question reminds me of Gore Vidal, who on being perpetually asked about his orientation wrote that there is "no such thing as being gay, only gay sexual acts." Gore refusing to call himself gay may be more of a result of the era in which he grew up and became a published writer than anything else.
There's an enlightening paragraph from that article that explains my own irritation with our cultural obsession with labels and definitions: "The word homosexual, said Vidal, was invented in the 1890s and heterosexual in the 1930s: 'To create categories is the enslavement of the categorized because the aim of every state is total control over the people who live in it. What better way is there than to categorize according to sex, about which people have so many hang-ups?'"
I do think it mostly is just another bullshit social construct to control and divide people. Why else would we care about such things as "What makes a real man?" if not to simply invent arbitrary rules to further discriminate against people. Taken to its extreme it convinces idiots to decree that a man can't have anal sex with a woman because it's "gay," but watching two women have sex is somehow the height of male heterosexuality. It's that sort of boneheaded logic that's made the issue all the more unimportant to me.
|
03-15-14 07:58pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
YankeeBastard's Reply
LOL! I didn't think so either, Yankee, otherwise I would have had a serious calcium deficiency starting around my early teens years (though I did drink a lot milk then). I know evolution can be weird at times but it would be hard to see how we evolved to simultaneously fire out millions of sperm while also losing calcium. :-0
|
03-14-14 08:03pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
Where's "None of the above/other"? ;-)
I like to rely on that golden rule of golf: "Play it where it lies."
If it seems appropriate for the scene, then that's how I want it to end. So a facial isn't always required, certainly not when it's done so hastily like a grenade's about to explode. But if the performer is into it on the receiving end--because honestly, it feels good for the shooter no matter what his "target" is--then a facial can be totally fine. When the poor gal is closing her eyes I don't think she's that into it, or at least doesn't have the thespian talents, and I'd rather it be done somewhere else.
Facials in real life are like meteors. More common than we'd like to think, and can be cool to watch when they occur, but most people would rather not be in their path.
When the guy doesn't come at all I say it's a little weird, and I'm usually thinking How the hell did he not[i] come after all that?! Those always seem the most unnatural.
|
03-13-14 07:35pm
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Balanced minds are overrated, graymane! :-)
|
03-13-14 06:24pm
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Unless it was a site where the members' section was censored anyway, like a Japanese site (though not all are censored), it wouldn't be a huge deal.
Still, it's Internet porn! We know what the naughty bits look like and know that they're the main attraction, no reason to pixel/black out the lucky few in the preview section or trial.
|
03-11-14 09:13pm
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
Unless the PU forums count as literature, no I don't. :-/
|
03-07-14 05:26pm
|
Reply
75
|
Wet And Pissy
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Review
Nice review, LPee23.
I joined PuffyNetwork myself a couple months ago and was quite happy with the sites...well, W&P was really my only interest. I would say that this site is pleasurably unique in shooting well--lighting, resolution, longer scenes--in a genre that too often doesn't get this treatment, instead relegating it to shitty, creepy, sites that have seemed to think that simply shooting "fetish" content makes up for a measurable amount of quality.
And to top it all off they have the crazy idea to depict the performers actually enjoying it, instead of the fetish=sadistic treatment angle that too many sites have gone for over the years. Who would have thought to make the content in porn appear to be pleasurable?
My main complaint would be, like RagingBuddhist raged in his review of PuffyNetowrk, that the download speeds were inconsistent and all too frequently slow, at least for the larger 1GB+ size files they have so many of. A growing problem, as the site builds up its lecherous library and you really want to get the most for your money. (But if you're into it, you damn sure will wait on every single file!)
|
03-05-14 12:39am
|
