| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I would love to say never cancelled but I don't want to risk burning out on one site so I cancel and then wait for fresh filth to build up and then rejoin six months or so down the line to load up my hard drives again.
|
02-18-10 12:02pm
|
Reply
377
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
And you have a loving partner too--you never forgot about her, right? ; )
|
02-17-10 08:24pm
|
Reply
378
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I was a little worried you had some insider information, plus since you have terabytes of porn I figured you would still have plenty to 'do' if PU bit the dust.
|
02-16-10 06:37pm
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
I would use the same approach I take whenever I lose or accidentally delete data: "Cry and beg them to come back!" and probably cry some more. If I cry over pretty much everything but spilled milk (and even then it depends on the situation) I sure as hell am going to cry when my community of loyal perverts is shut down. : )
|
02-16-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
380
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Doesn't the rest of the world get pissed when we Americans use the term football for what's played at the Super Bowl and soccer for what everyone else calls football?
: )
|
02-12-10 05:38pm
|
Reply
381
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I would say that your first paragraph can also apply to men, though I bet most of us are far too 'manly' to admit it.
I am not saying men and women are alike in this regard but I think, at least in the West, that cultures have some pretty screwed up ideas about sexuality or at least in terms of how rigidly we feel we have to define it.
For example, If you are a male heterosexual then there is a sort of list of unwritten rules that you are expected to follow with the opposite sex, and engaging in a number of activities--even solely with the opposite sex--is strictly forbidden. Just think of the number of times you've dismissed something as 'gay' despite the fact that it would be with someone of the opposite sex. Wouldn't a man doing something with a woman already be defined as straight?
The same is true of women and homosexuals, though I would argue gays are a little more open minded as few societies in the modern world truly accept gay people as equally as they do straight people and thus they are not as worried about what rules and norms they are expected to follow in order to please the society.
But back to the question, I would say "Only a few are" but defining "few" very loosely as I don't think anyone knows about "all women" and the question is a little absolute in that regard. Maybe I'm just fantasizing here, but I am sure there at least a few who are truly comfortable with both men and women and wouldn't have it any other way, but the vast majority would define their sexuality as either gay or straight.
|
02-10-10 05:18pm
|
Reply
382
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
It's not called the 'girlfriend experience' for nothing; people want as much 'service' as their money can get them, though I am not sure what Ashley Dupree-type rates get you beyond a job resignation.
I wonder if girls can demand higher rates in porn when the guy is wearing a condom? Probably not though as condom-ed sex in porn would risk a smaller audience than the typical bareback-and-free style.
|
02-08-10 11:30pm
|
Reply
383
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
"Sometimes" as HIV/AIDS is not the only threat to our "favorite porn starlets" sadly enough. : (
One of my favorites from ALS, Melissa Ashley, has suffered through ovarian cancer and now possibly faces cervical cancer as well. As a result she has spent quite a bit of time in hospitals as well has having some major organs removed--all while struggling to secure the funds needed to pay for it out of pocket since health care is apparently a privilege, not a right.
Back to the original question; yes, I do feel concerned that any one of my favorites could contract HIV/AIDS or any other STD out there but there is plenty of shit that seems to end or ruin the lives of the young and horny. Drugs, car accidents, angry partners, and health problems like the one I mentioned above all take their toll, though STDS are arguably the most easily preventable, at least in theory since condoms aren't exactly what a lot of porn audiences like to see.
|
02-08-10 11:23pm
|
Reply
384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
"Just not my thing."
I don't understand the appeal of watching what should essentially be warm up acts--the blow jobs, hand jobs, etc.--turned into the main act itself. Messemer asked about things being stupid and boring when stretched out over twenty minutes but I think it's just weak content that isn't exactly, shall we say, 'complete'--it's missing the main course!
This is really one of the those things that may be fun experiencing in real life (at least on the receiving end) but there is no fun in watching it, probably not even if it was you in the video. You are watching someone do what is basically a fluffer's job with their clothes off.
|
02-07-10 06:49pm
|
Reply
385
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
"[T]heir ankles up around their ears." Around their ears? Ouch! :0
|
02-05-10 10:45pm
|
Reply
386
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I'm still worried about the mainstreaming of porn. Don't get me wrong; I want all the legal and social protections possible but I don't necessarily want everyone into it as much I am. I think this ends up making porn more generic and also more stupider--think BangBros and you might understand what I'm getting at.
Part of what I like about porn is that it is not totally accepted or at least not totally loved by the society at large. Granted this has its risks like legal snafus and restrictions that end up negatively affecting other parts of society but I still like to think that I am part of a small but strong minority rather than just another big meaningless group. This is probably why I can't stand things like Playboy or porn awards and sales figures.
I guess this means porn really hasn't changed my attitude of even the most attractive females I meet because you don't know whether the subject of porn or a viewpoint influenced by it is going to get you a nice warm hug or a swift punch in the face.
|
02-05-10 10:57am
|
Reply
387
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ezride's Reply
I say there's a huge difference between watching an actress 'act' in a serious or semi-serious role and seeing her masturbate or get pounded like a jackhammer, and this is regardless of whether or not she is attractive. Whether the girls who do all their fucking on screen are acting or not is kind of irrelevant when it's almost guaranteed that audiences are going to have different reactions watching porn compared to the ones they have when they watch non-porn entertainment.
In any event the question was more about your attitude towards attractive women you meet, not necessarily about meeting bona fide porn talent like Monahan apparently has (lucky bastard!).
|
02-05-10 10:47am
|
Reply
388
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I'm not sure, but "Don't get your hopes up, pervert" and "She's probably not into that" are two thoughts that frequently enter my mind.
|
02-04-10 11:35am
|
Reply
389
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Sorry, don't like uniforms. My fantasies are too imaginative for the boundaries of a "uniform!" :)
|
02-02-10 07:01pm
|
Reply
390
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Hmm...you know, to be honest I never noticed them in all the years I have ogled at Hustlers. You learn something new everyday.
|
01-31-10 07:41pm
|
Reply
391
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Wow, three members who have admitted to not having cell phones...I like PU more every day!
I know the iPad is coming but I am still not sure how people are going to easily haul it around like a cell phone. Oh, and wasn't it designed for reading books, not checking out the newest porn video? ;)
|
01-31-10 01:52pm
|
Reply
392
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I definitely agree photos are getting pretty big, especially when you consider the vast majority are 72ppi JPEGs (web standard, intended to reduce load times), which are still compressed files no matter how well they were shot or edited. I still spoil myself and go for the biggest sizes when they are available but sometimes sites fall short of my screen-filling demands. Like my recent subscription to SimonScans which is really surprising me in the size, or lack thereof, in its photos.
|
01-29-10 02:26pm
|
Reply
393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Without question, the absolute highest quality option available!
|
01-29-10 09:31am
|
Reply
394
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I wish I could say I don't give a fuck, but after hearing about Holly Sampson (ALS' 'Zoe') I must admit I actually almost admire the guy. I mean he still has the mark on his permanent record of being known for playing the alleged "sport" of golf professionally--honestly still my biggest problem with the guy--but c'mon! I still remember when I first laid eyes on Zoe way back when, and I definitely did not (and still don't) have the money to show her how I swing my favorite club. : ( But I can still dream can't I?
I am not really much of a fan of Holly/Zoe anymore, especially after seeing her in the truly atrocious "Emmanuelle 2000," not to mention her plasticized breasts, but I am still loyal to the perverted geniuses at ALS. Still why couldn't TW have picked a somewhat newer and even crazier model, like Amy Lee or Nella? That would have been my kind of news story!
|
01-28-10 01:16am
|
Reply
395
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
"Not my thing"
I have to admit I don't find them that attractive and more than just a little intimidating. I am also not a fan of girls who look somewhat muscular even if they're not bodybuilders--I want to at least believe that a woman couldn't beat me up too badly, which is pretty hard if she's got bigger biceps than me. : (
Come to think of it, I don't even like it when the male talent look like bodybuilders because it makes them look like abnormal steroid-fueled mad men who just broke out of prison. I'm not saying they all need to look like Ron Jeremy (one is more than enough) but somewhat normal would be appreciated.
|
01-25-10 10:48am
|
Reply
396
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Join a site from a country whose porn models you are not too familiar with and you can be swamped with new names and faces. For example, I recently joined Simon Scans--almost all British girls with a few Eastern Euro ones thrown in--and I can honestly say I have never seen any of them before (minus a couple of the Euro girls). I haven't joined AbbyWinters yet (supposed to be nearly all amateur Australians) but I am sure once I do then I will once again be overwhelmed since I can't think of any models I have seen from that part of the world.
|
01-16-10 03:19pm
|
Reply
397
|
N/A
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
I'll step up to the plate and agree with you, dracken. The difference between a 17 year old and an 18 year old? You could be talking months or even just a few days. Yes, it's black letter law here, but there are plenty of cases of girls literally trying and succeeding to get into porn within a short time after having turned 18 (our debate over Sasha Grey's 'It girl' status mentioned her doing this). How exactly, beyond a few weeks age difference, is she anymore ready than someone a few weeks younger? I understand in the eyes of the law that those few weeks are all the difference and not knowing that fact will basically ruin and blacklist you for life but I am still offended by the idea we are all automatically and equally mature the second we hit 18 (except to drink, but that's another debate).
I am not encouraging anyone to break the law, as there is no leniency in underage porn and the vast majority of it is done by force, not the Traci Lords lie-and-fake-your-age tactic (still got a lot of people in trouble, and a lot of porn destroyed), and the last thing I want to see happen is another aspect of adult life delayed until 21, but a little honesty about the situation would be nice. And why is 21 such a magical age anyway?
You also mentioned an 18 year old getting charged with rape for having consensual sex with his 17 year old girlfriend; you're right, this is the epitome of stupid. A boyfriend is not a porno. For one thing he probably couldn't last through a whole 30 minute scene, but on a more serious note he is not trying to sell her (i.e. her body) for profit, he is engaging in a relationship, and there's a big difference. Age of consent is determined by state, so it could be as young as sixteen in some areas, but porn is federally controlled and the limit is 18, no ifs, ands, or buts. Some states have a little common sense and apply close-in-age rules which can give exceptions to a few years difference between an underage partner and a partner of age, but many do not.
|
01-13-10 01:32pm
|
Reply
398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Sounds just as bad as trying to talk about politics, at least without everyone yelling or getting atop their respective soapboxes. Maybe viewing porn is like voting; you either do it or you don't, but you generally try and keep your choices private. And like politics you probably not going to change anyone's mind very easily, if at all.
|
01-07-10 11:32pm
|
Reply
399
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I like to be organized so I get frustrated when sites are not consistent, especially when they use a different name in a video than what a model is called on the site or even in the file name itself. Make up your mind!
|
01-05-10 12:28pm
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
"Normal as possible" might make for a very short scene for many of us, plus like others have said here try surprising a girl by cumming on her face without her getting upset.
|
01-04-10 09:40pm
|
