| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Because the alcohol companies can't add marijuana to their product line. ;-)
Prescription drugs are even more dangerous--they are literally doses of poison concocted in labs--but they are part of a multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry. Alcohol definitely has also been doing harm as long as it's been around but it's also given some comfort and relaxation to people as well. Life sucks, and has sucked, for the majority of the human population for as long as it's been around so looking for something to take the edge off is logical.
|
04-10-10 08:50pm
|
Reply
352
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Wow! First to vote and reply! Uh, what was the question again?
Not sure what this has to do with porn (both help you relax I guess) but yes, absolutely. There are more dangerous chemicals in much of the 'food' at your local grocery store, and that's before you even get to the pharmacy.
There are a couple of problems; drug laws, including ones outlawing marijuana, have been used to control people, not protect them, and the government would not like to lose that control anytime soon. The second is that marijuana may be too easy to grow and harvest for large companies to make it a competitive crop in the free market (it's called weed for a reason).
But if you have a medical condition...
|
04-09-10 12:49am
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
So we've come up with a basic qualifier for a starlet to be dubbed an "Anal Queen," is there anyone we would like to nominate, or I guess more accurately, crown?
A few years ago I would have said that maybe Audrey Hollander or [ignore]Aurora Snow[/ignore] should ascend this debauched throne but now it seems like the vast majority do some form of anal action pretty frequently if not every single scene.
(Interesting note; I recently watched a video of [ignore]Aurora Snow[/ignore] giving a radio interview where she talked about her career and she also mentioned how she warms up for backdoor scenes with her own 'anal kit'--funny but made a lot of sense too.)
|
04-06-10 01:02am
|
Reply
354
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I would have chosen "All of the Above" but "Taking 3 cocks anally" sounds damn near impossible at best. I guess how often is probably a better choice as long as its done enthusiastically.
|
04-05-10 09:23am
|
Reply
355
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Same size as my monitor, exotics--you gotta love the widescreen!
|
04-04-10 09:27pm
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Poll
Ah, what a great poll! My thinking is if you're going to have a terabyte or bigger hard drive (or even one with a few gigs) then organization is key.
While others have mentioned they like to be surprised, I don't. I want my filth and I want it now! :-) So my system is usually organized like this: Site Name>Model Name>Videos/Photos (separate folders for each model). If it's a DVD site I then organize this way: Genre>DVD title. Genre can get pretty specific, and still causes a lot of confusion but it usually works.
For my biggest and oldest site collection, ALS Scan, I did the method where there are separate video and photo folders and then separate model folders within each one--big mistake! Every time I see some photos and I want to see a corresponding video or vice versa I have to go back to the separate video or photo folder and then find the model name all over again. I have yet to reorganize it and I regret ever splitting it up this way originally so I don't recommend people do this for big collections.
|
03-30-10 10:27pm
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Hmm, for a few days but that was from shoveling/cleanup not loss of electricity or Internet service.
Losing food and heat is one thing but Internet--boy, I better have that reconnected very quickly! Just kidding, Khan! At least you and your family made it through in one piece this winter. Hope no one else had it too hard these past few months.
|
03-24-10 12:31am
|
Reply
358
|
N/A
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
I'm assuming she would have had electrolysis right before the fateful trip that gets us stranded on the island!
If I'm to believe that I'm stranded on an island with my favorite star than I'm also going to believe that 'carpet' problems do not exist.
|
03-22-10 11:36am
|
Reply
359
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Aw man, I would love to have a hot porn star (gotta populate the island) but if I don't have sun screen I would probably die of exposure within a few hours.
: - (
Knowing my luck the island would have trees for shade from the sun but the porn star would accidentally eat a poisonous plant and die to leave me like Tom Hanks in "Cast Away"--alone with dental problems and only a volleyball to talk to for the next four years.
|
03-22-10 11:30am
|
Reply
360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
Far too expensive? Really? I've seen new players for under $150. I think Amazon currently sells a Sony Blu-Ray player for about $130. Of course this is just the player, and these rarely, if ever, come with an HDMI cable that's required to send a high definition signal to the display (which needs to be HD to show the best picture, BTW). These cables usually start around $15 dollars and can easily go over $100 so I'm sure it's a complex cable-player manufacturer conspiracy devised to nickel and dime consumers for their recession dollars. ; )
I would argue a complete system--HD display, player, and sound system (optional but it's nice)--is where the initial cost comes in. My real problem is the disc prices are outrageous. Unless you're a genuine film aficionado with money to burn and DVD resolution just doesn't cut it for you I can't see much benefit (literally, my vision is terrible) in buying a Blu-Ray version of a release over the DVD one. Studios don't seem to be pushing Blu-Ray versions much beyond mentioning them first in marketing; "Available on Blu-Ray and DVD Tuesday!"
And I'd assume the studios, or whoever they contract to author the discs, simply make two compressed versions from the final cut of the film or whatever show they are selling. They might offer additional audio tracks and bonus crap if it fits on a Blu-Ray disc but DVDs still sell. But I don't even think a lot of buyers' decisions are based that much on specific extras or bonus features--they really just want the movie to play, not skip, and be able to do that over and over again for years.
|
03-21-10 10:30am
|
Reply
361
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, but it's a PS3 and I have yet to actually watch a BluRay movie on it--just been using it to play video games.
|
03-20-10 05:59pm
|
Reply
362
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
In person or just watching on video? : )
Okay, to be more serious I'd say masturbation, or other if there was such a choice.
|
03-18-10 09:32am
|
Reply
363
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
You can get rid of your spy agencies in Denmark simply by voting them out? Sorry, but here in America voting only changes the names on the corner offices and the photos on the wall (which I have always found very creepy). The last thing any voter would be able to do is dictate the policies of the FBI or NSA or any of the other alphabet soup agencies 'protecting' us, much less get rid of them all together. Hell, if we could do that I might start voting again and get the defense budget cut by half, legalize all drugs and prostitution, outlaw the Patriot Acts and have the top officials from the last Bush administration arrested and sent to Gitmo. ; )
Oh, if only it were so...
|
03-16-10 07:22pm
|
Reply
364
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I am sure they are already reading my e-mails so why not all my "web travels" as well? The only problem is I am a pretty boring guy online (and in real life...) and they're just wasting their time. Oh fuck it, keep up the good work FBI, CIA, NSA, or whoever are spending their time, money--ours, by the way--and manpower finding out how perverted its own citizens really are.
If these James Bond super spy wannabe assholes wish to catch real criminals I suggest they stop reading citizens' browser histories and start doing real intelligence work.
|
03-16-10 12:39am
|
Reply
365
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I agree that the old warehouse is probably the worst place to shoot but I find it's because it can be really creepy and weird, like the scene of a crime rather than something erotic and enjoyable.
|
03-14-10 06:16pm
|
Reply
366
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Sounds nice and I guess you can never be too prepared (though I am sure you'll be overwhelmed with choice in videos and photos). Why are you so worried about 2012? Sarah Palin or someone even crazier and stupider is going to get elected and society will collapse within a matter of days?
|
03-11-10 09:40pm
|
Reply
367
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
That way you can defend your collection by force, right? (Remind me to never piss you off. ; ) )
|
03-10-10 09:33pm
|
Reply
368
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, never.
Most politicians are anti-porn even if they've never been asked and are not open about it (just like their extramarital affairs, private income sources, lobbying connections, criminal records, Ponzi schemes, etc.). I don't vote as it is so it doesn't exactly effect me--99% of politicians don't give a shit about 99% of what actually matters to me anyway.
Like Drooler mentioned porn is just a wedge issue designed to distract voters and pretty much anyone else who will listen from caring or even thinking about real issues. And if some political actor genuinely cares about porn they are usually just using it to push religion--masqueraded as 'morals' and 'values'--further into government affairs despite the Establishment Clause.
|
03-10-10 09:11pm
|
Reply
369
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Lol. Yes, and women WILL judge and get testy! It sucks because women don't see it as just looking but as serious boredom/disinterest/wandering in a relationship. I think you're lucky if she's quietly accepting or at least neutral on the subject--she doesn't gloat about it during the holidays but she doesn't seek out a marriage counselor either.
|
03-09-10 01:08pm
|
Reply
370
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I would say "Never! I've been with this porn a lot longer than I've been with you and it's never yelled at me or judged me!" but on the other hand I am constantly reminding myself to never say "never" as I really can't predict the future. Having said that (and not having a girlfriend at the moment) I would expect it to be a very good and fulfilling--not to mention distracting--relationship for me to go and say "I guess I don't need this porn after all."
I've said it before but if you have to choose between a partner and your collection you probably didn't do a great job choosing your partner and you really shouldn't have to give up a harmless innocent habit just to please someone else.
|
03-09-10 01:01pm
|
Reply
371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
"Didn't know women have orgasms"...in porn. ; )
I just couldn't resist either, but c'mon, really? Every time a girl does a scene she lifts off at the end and produces another mind-blowing orgasm? Sorry, but I doubt it (but I can dream can't I?).
Unless she's a squirter--another controversial topic--than what exactly does she have to physically do or 'prove' the way a guy does when he, ahem, hits his mark? I understand some convulsing and screaming as if she is possessed by satan himself is to be expected in some cases, but a little light moaning and groaning and most directors seem to be satisfied. It's hard to believe that they are really climaxing that often though.
|
03-06-10 11:32am
|
Reply
372
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I have to say the guys armed with the big guns (you know, measured in the double digits) truly are stunt cocks. What other career path is going to reward them for being so, well, naturally rewarded themselves?
My problem is that too often John Doe's third leg becomes the focus of these hardcore scenes and most of the video is spent watching him thrust/force his way into the poor woman like he's helping her commit hara-kiri using his penis-sword of death. It also doesn't help that so many of these guys look like they never tire of watching the girl on the receiving end suffer--their creepy-crawly sneers and jeers don't exactly make the whole experience look like a romantic date. It's like the dudes have turned into Toyotas and can't stop 'moving forward.' :0
|
03-04-10 05:23pm
|
Reply
373
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
If they're going to have smaller cocks then they might as well not be able hold their fire through half hour super-boners either, if a "more 'real' or relatable" feel is the goal. Oh, and they don't get to do all the crazy contortionist positions and acts we civilians can only dream about (and even then it's kinda hard), all with average-looking girls only--no super honeys.
C'mon, it's porn, it's fantasy! Yeah, I wish I was more relatable to the actor, not the other way around, but if I really want a more realistic experience then I'll go and watch some amateur stuff or just turn off the video altogether and get rejected in person. :(
Plus, porn should be attracting the well-endowed as sex is pretty much the whole focus, and the penis is crucial to boy-girl sex. It would be like asking professional basketball teams to not be recruiting so many tall guys, or beauty pageants to stop using so many beautiful women.
|
03-04-10 05:09pm
|
Reply
374
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Laptops are incredibly handy but I prefer desktops; better keyboard, monitor, with lots of upgradeability.
|
02-24-10 02:20pm
|
Reply
375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'd like to but I simply don't have the time or the patience to de-douchebag the countless videos in my collection that lose focus of the people who are actually in front of the camera not the snickering drooling horn dogs (no offense, Drooler) off to the side.
What I'd would really love to do is get the raw footage and edit that down. I bet I could make a far more enjoyable or at least faster paced cut without all the bullshit I normally sit through. I'm an impatient guy and I get it already; she's stripping but she eventually needs to get fully naked and cut down on all the "ooos" and "ahhs" poses. I can fantasize pretty well on my own and a lot of these girls are probably nursing hangovers or coming down from some pretty mean highs so they don't need to act as if they are having their best orgasm ever, especially multiple times in the same video.
Oh, and one more thing: whoever edits hardcore videos, please--I beg of you!--stop intercutting with a shot of the dude's face in pure ecstasy/agony (it's kinda hard to tell) as he launches his fireworks show, okay? You don't need to show me him whacking his way to victory for five minutes either but I don't need his contorting facial expression to 'get' the scene. Though the female orgasm may be a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma guys' orgasms are not that hard to figure out when you see them onscreen, so get rid of his fucking face shots.
|
02-22-10 03:54pm
|
