| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
BobA's Review
For quality of content, these guys are 90+. For navigation, a low 80 or high 70. For business practices they've earned a 50-. When I first signed up for 21Sextury they provided an abbreviated network and added a new sit with each monthly renewal. I did exactly that and would up having access to every site. They guaranteed that I would have access to all sites as long as I maintained a continuous membership
Then they decided to split the site and assigned me to 21Sextreme rather than 21Sextury. They let me continue for a few months then pulled the plug on the 21sextury network. They would only offer me access to all 21Sextury sites if I joined with a separate membership.
Now they allow several sites to dry up and add new content via yet another network...21Naturals.
Much as I love their content, their business practices must change for the better if they ever expect me to return to their membership roster.
|
10-03-13 11:37pm
|
Reply
502
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Most Western Digital (WD) hard drives have software on them that password protect the drive. It works very well and is not invasive.
|
10-02-13 03:44pm
|
Reply
503
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks, RA. I forgot about that deal and have always liked Evil Angel, especially Christoph Clark's stuff.
Just signed up at the PU price.
|
10-02-13 03:41pm
|
Reply
504
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I will sign up for a site I know well and that has a good reputation on TBP/PU, if the price is $30 or less. A discount would always be nice but doesn't make a difference.
OTOH, a site I've never joined for whatever reason that has a good price ($15 or less per month) either because of a discount or because it's a standing price, and that has no serious down-ticks in PU reviews, I'll bit.
No reviews or comments on TBP/PU = No signup regardless of the deal.
|
10-02-13 03:39pm
|
Reply
505
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I suggested this poll because of the annoying processes used by some sites. FTVGirls, DDFNetwork and 21Sextury have bounced me off multiple times...usually on a Friday so I can't reach their support functions until the next Monday.
I was bounced without any explanation by Reality Kings and never received any response from their support people. In fact I was automatically renewed while still locked out. The biller reversed the charge when I called their 800 number and complained.
I was restored in all cases except RK but got no extra time to cover for the lost time except by FTV. I'm still with FTVGirls but have left DDFNetwork and 21Sextury.
What I see as being very strange is how many sites I've joined and never had a problem, yet I seem to go to sites where I get bounced regularly.
|
09-23-13 03:20pm
|
Reply
506
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Reply
Me too.
I find search functions to be among the most important aspect of porn sites. A great site with a lousy search capability becomes a mediocre site as far as I'm concerned...and an otherwise mediocre site with an outstanding search function becomes an outstanding site.
Now the question could be enhanced with an accuracy element. Video Box has enhanced its search function but because they misidentify so many of the porn stars, it's frustrating as Hell.
|
09-17-13 02:13pm
|
Reply
507
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree. BB is up front with their ad displays for other sites and isn't using trickery as other sites (like Naughty America*) do.
*See my comment on the PU page for Naughty America.
|
09-17-13 12:55pm
|
Reply
508
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have long term memberships for both VideoBox and Twistys because they are reliable and always have some content that appeals to me. The discount is big enough that it makes sense.
Then I occasionally sign up for one month on other sites that grab me. If, when I cancel, they offer a major discount to stay around, and if I like the site, I'll sign up for another month.
|
09-10-13 10:52am
|
Comment
509
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
|
09-08-13 10:37pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
510
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer my own password. While we're on the subject, however, the security procedures set up by a site drive me nutz. Capcha is one. Complex passwords is another.
I'm good with security for financial sites but Porn sites???
|
09-06-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
511
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not interested in watching some guy get jerked off in porn. I dig females and female body parts, some more than others.
A blow job is OK if the cameraman's angle includes a good amount of PTA (pussy, tits and ass) and the babe is using a lot of sensuality. But I don't get the appeal of a hand job of any kind.
If I want to see a hand job of some guy's schlong, I can look in a mirror when I'm jacking off to some sweet babe's performance.
Also, I don't see how site like Tug Jobs can sell their stuff...but that's their gig, not mine.
|
09-04-13 11:24am
|
Reply
512
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Thanks Squirrel. My first reaction was more positive because the reversal required only one communication; but you made me think. The outfit with the great service was Epoch, not Naughty America.
The Naughty America site is a very well constructed site with superb creativity. They don't need this kind of sketchy business practice.
|
09-02-13 02:28pm
|
Comment
513
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
09-01-13 11:13pm
Replies (12)
|
Reply
514
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Compared to the cost of movie house porn and titty bars back in the 70's and 80's, and compared to the videos in the 90's, on-line porn is dirt cheap and far better in content and in storage/retrieval.
A month of a porn site is cheaper than movies and sports attendance by far.
So, yes. Online porn is a far better value than most other entertainment.
|
08-29-13 03:17pm
|
Reply
515
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I voted Face because that's more significant by a narrow margin over the other choices.
|
08-27-13 08:18pm
|
Reply
516
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm a video guy so Zip is not that big an issue with me. However, I agree with RA. No zip means the site is second or third class and not worth my investment in it.
|
08-25-13 01:04pm
|
Reply
517
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never made a big deal. Even with Hitomi Tanaka vids, her primary assets are never censored out. Her pussy shots, while blurred, are usually rather clear, much like the 320 videos we used to get back about 10 years ago. and
|
08-23-13 10:20am
|
Reply
518
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
CCBill or Epoch. Period. They handle inquiries quickly and efficiently.
Any others, forget it.
|
08-19-13 10:18am
|
Reply
519
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
Nasos's Review
I agree. A very well done review. I look forward to yoir next effort.
Your tastes look like they may match mine when you say your next review will be Holly Randall.
|
08-17-13 10:33pm
|
Reply
520
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
2008 Toshiba laptop with XP. Works fine. No need to change.
|
08-17-13 10:23pm
|
Reply
521
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Love some, hate some and am OK with some. (I voted just OK as a sort of average score.)
The chatty chatty no bang bang stuff is a total waste of time. OTOH, blooper stuff is usually great. Watching naked babes playing with themselves, dressing and undressing, going through a buffet line, getting porked as recreation whilst waiting for the main shot to get set up, etc. are always interesting.
I always check out the BTS stuff just because they are unpredictable.
|
08-11-13 09:06am
|
Reply
522
|
Saboom
(0)
|
Reply of
Bhael's Review
Thanks very much for the warning. I stumbled onto this site today and was interested in signing up...until I say this review. No downloads plus shady billing = forget it. You saved me $30 today.
|
08-10-13 01:16pm
|
Reply
523
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
If I pay for a full month of access, I want a full month of access. If I wait 24 hours to get that access and my subscription is extended by one day, then I'm cool with that. Same deal with 48 hours, etc.
But if I'm down for any period and don't get an extension, then I want a 12 hour response.
|
08-09-13 09:52am
|
Reply
524
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree completely. I really don't have any interest in the stunt cock one way or the other; just the babe and h.ger assets. The fucking is part of the fantasy but the condom tells me that the fantasy will not cause severe health complications for the participants.
|
08-07-13 09:19am
|
Reply
525
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
In some cases, such as Sophie Dee, the change is dramatic and good. In others like Victoria Vonn where it is a bummer.
But all considered, I'm a PTA kinda porn lover. Hait color isn't all that important.
PTA = Pussy Tits and Ass
|
07-24-13 11:49pm
|
