| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Private's Reply
Thanks for your reply.
It would be very helpful if you were to post another reply advising those of us who may be ready to sign up to your site (but who are hesitant) that the cancellation procedure has been updated.
Thanks again,
Jack
|
12-07-13 02:04pm
|
Reply
477
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Ditto graymane's comments. Excellent review. You are a major asset to the PU site. My trust rating almost 5 years ago continues to be reinforced.
Thanks,
Jack
|
12-07-13 01:52pm
|
Reply
478
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Shower, definitely.
The noise is annoying, the cameraman can't move easily to get those choice shots of the key female body parts, water drops and/or foggy lenses take away from the scene, and the babe is not completely free to move as she normally would.
Not listed, but the next worst place is in a car (regular sedan, not a van with lots of room) where the camera angles are limited by awkward camera positions.
Last, and least, I don't care for underwater shots in a pool where the lighting is spotty and the colors are unnatural.
|
12-03-13 10:19am
|
Reply
479
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
IE and Firefox but I prefer Firefox.
|
12-01-13 02:17pm
|
Reply
480
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Reply
Ditto. As they say you only have one chance to make a good first impression.
|
11-25-13 09:10pm
|
Reply
481
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto, too.
|
11-17-13 02:55pm
|
Reply
482
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
Randyman's Comment
OOPS,
I was in the process of breaking my own rule...never get involved in any site that has one or more downticks on PU/TBP. I received an email offering Simonscans for $14.95 for one month which is a good price, and it still showed that it bills thru CCScan.
But my usually dormant virus scan jumped to attention immediately with a plethora of warnings; so many that I closed out of the site immediately and booted out of my computer altogether.
Needless to say I did not try again.
The experience left me asking, however, why would a venerable site like Simonscan not protect itself and its customers? Perhaps that's why PU/TBP shut down their access to that site.
|
11-10-13 03:25pm
|
Reply
483
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
Jaimes's Review
BJ's are overdone everywhere (except on my dick) but seems to be the only point of interest for these amateur videographers. My beef is that, as Jaimes says, they seem to be fixated on male body parts and really have only a passing interest in PTA (Pussy, Tits and ass).
Thanks, Jaimes for saying what needed to be said for this site.
BTW, a 60 is too generous in my humble opinion.
|
11-10-13 03:06pm
|
Reply
484
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
Yes. A disappointment every time. I've learned my lesson and will join a site because it's a good site and also has scenes of a babe I want more of, but I'll never join a site just because it has a specific babe unless the site has been reviewed by either TBP or by a PU member and has a high rating.
|
11-09-13 03:34pm
|
Reply
485
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Reply
Agree.
|
11-08-13 12:36am
|
Reply
486
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Nope. And large and/or puffy areolae isn't either, is it?
|
11-03-13 01:53pm
|
Reply
487
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RedRoger's Comment
Great heads up. Lost interest fast. No way I'm signing up.
|
10-31-13 11:51pm
|
Reply
488
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Don't wanna spook not only the horses but also the bunnies and such. The little kiddies would think it's a Halloween costume...or perhaps a real live hobgoblin they were encountering.
If I could be fully dressed and the horses are safe, perhaps I would, but after thinking about it I would probably prefer a titty bar or "gentlemen's club" to a bunny ranch.
|
10-30-13 10:57am
|
Comment
489
|
Busty Terry
(0)
|
|
10-18-13 10:23am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
490
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
You can add, "artsy fartsy" to the list where the producer includes visual and sound effects that make it impossible to get aroused by the central purpose of a porn flick. One more add is ridiculous heavy metal music repeating over and over. Finally is aq cameraman who spends way too much time looking up the dude's asshole while he's porking the gorgeous babe who is out of sight.
|
10-14-13 08:58am
|
Reply
491
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I said "Other" because "none" is not an option.
I usually pass up the anorexic and BBW types. I'll D/L fake boobs in rare instances where the babe just does "it" for me, like Memphis Monroe. Generally, though, I skip past aftermarket tits. Low quality is a subjective term and pertains, I assume, to the video quality and not the model. I'll D/L some low def stuff occasionally.
The only option left is "unknown model." If the babe makes my little Willy turn into big Dick, I'm keeping it regardless of fame or fortune.
|
10-14-13 12:26am
|
Comment
492
|
Piss Bank
(0)
|
|
10-12-13 10:57am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
493
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Frankly, in my opinion, the use of gratuitous derogatory comments is a sign of misogyny that really obscures the sexual desirability of the model and demonstrates the level of contempt on the part of the producer.
I want the model to be treated like a lady, not degraded for no reason.
|
10-12-13 10:41am
|
Reply
494
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
A little snuggling after a glass of her favorite wine is all it takes...if she's already in the mood. If she isn't, nothing works. Period.
|
10-08-13 04:24pm
|
Comment
495
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
|
10-08-13 04:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
496
|
Jim Slip
(0)
|
|
10-07-13 06:50pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
497
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
Nasos's Comment
Reminds me of the Hustler site back about 8 or 9 years ago where they set up the teases but wanted members to buy the DVD's.
Worse they permitted downloads, but the download was linked back to their site, so if you quit, they would block your playbacks. Worse, if you moved a downloaded video while still a member, they blocked it presumably because they figure you sold the download to someone else.
The folks at Hustler make Larry Flynt's persona as a nasty smelly scumbag very believable.
|
10-06-13 03:59pm
|
Reply
498
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I proposed the poll bc I've thought about it a lot.
Before cyberporn when my stash was primarily mags, then VHS tapes, then CD's, plus a little on my 10GB internal hard drive, I sorta didn't do anything, but gave it a lot of thought.
Then along came the web and the dramatic increase in quality and size so all the old stuff is just lying around.
My external drives with my current stuff are all password protected, for what that's worth, so the drives themselves can be wiped and used by whomever wants them.
But reading the comments and thinking about my old shit, I think I'll dump everything I haven't touched in 5 years or more.
Now another poll question comes to mind that I think I'll submit; what do you do with old porn you no longer want to keep in your stash?
|
10-06-13 03:44pm
|
Reply
499
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Off topic, but what makes scenes with prolapses erotic? That I just do not get.
|
10-05-13 10:45am
|
Reply
500
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The anus is intended for several things; an alternative to an overused pussy, a tighter squeeze, an opportunity for two guys to get it off inside the same chick, and, last, the standard use.
But I don't get the huge amount of anal in porn these days. Maybe I'm missing something but doesn't the poop chute normally have an unpleasant odor? Does a dick get brown whilst poking around looking for a colon?
Give me a pussy, outie preferred with nice flaps (aka a ham sandwich) any day over an asshole.
Just my preference.
|
10-04-13 12:41am
|
