| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Sell Your GF
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
My parents mentioned that they would turn the tv off as they undress for bed. Then turn it back out once safely under the sheets.
|
07-19-20 09:22pm
|
Reply
2
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Reply
U have some very good points. I suspect the member in question didn’t complain about RearAdmirals more positive review as he, just like me, didn’t see it. I may log in 5 times in 12 hours then disappear for three mths. I see no conspiracy here.
|
04-27-20 10:36pm
|
Reply
3
|
James Deen
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Reply
Okay, so you work daily with abused women. Clearly you are accomplishing much more in improving the human condition than what I do in my chickenshit job. But his post is not fake news: Deen has been accused by several women of abuse.
|
04-27-20 08:36am
|
Reply
4
|
Sapphix
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
That one white leather conch used at Sapphix must smell like the toilet seat of a all-female crew's tuna boat.
|
11-12-19 08:56pm
|
Reply
5
|
Dorcel Club
(0)
|
Reply of
PhilPhil's Comment
To each his own. I've no problems with condoms, having been a member twice in the last two or so years. I like their work, esp the orgies.
|
10-27-19 12:00pm
|
Reply
6
|
English Lads
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Comment
Holy Toledo! I can get blown for $63.95!
...and this site is no Staxus or BelAmi.
|
09-30-19 09:38pm
|
Reply
7
|
All Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Two models found here I find quite easy on the eyes: Chanell Heart and Leah Winters. But the cinematographer has an unbreakable fetish for wide-angle lens. After 20, 30 minutes I'm getting sea-sick.
|
09-02-19 03:52pm
|
Reply
8
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Sir: another review of the first water. Thanks!
|
02-27-19 10:56am
|
Review
9
|
Hegre
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-The superlatives mentioned in the reviews of others still apply.
-All flesh without exception observed by me are filmed by highly competent lensmen. I wouldn't blink if we learned this site is their side business to teaching cinematography or shooting high-end commercials.
-Watch more than four or five massage scenes and unless you are already a licensed physical therapist, you're gonna learn something.
-As of 15 Feb., six mth m'ship discounted at $49.95, one mth at twenty.
-776 scenes claimed. |
| Cons: |
-Poor pagination. Clicking on a section leads to near endless scrolling.
-Pop-ups for cam sites.
-Roughly 85% softcore or lesbian. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Let me confuse the issue by saying my grade of 90/100 is a rating given in regards to other soft core sites. Yes, there are a number of scenes of male/female interaction but these are of a relatively small number. To me it remains a softcore site. Hence its a 90 when compared to Domani,Met-Art, et al.
-Nowadays I've run across too many sites where the physical beauty is not the main hiring criteria. Where looks takes a back seat to circus grade dexterity, humiliating and unconventional sex acts. I'd rather watch a 9.5/10 masturbate than a woman of uncertain pulchritude engage in double anal.
-Even with current discounts these scenes certainly won't raise the pulse of someone whose tastes runs more towards legalporno.com. For me it remains difficult to assign value to the more esoteric verges of pornography. |
|
02-16-19 03:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
10
|
Bel Ami Online
(0)
|
Reply of
Aznboilvr's Review
Yeah, the catalog of KinkyAngels is now to be found at freshmen.net
|
01-01-19 09:26pm
|
Reply
11
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
yujin's Reply
...whateveryou think is best..
Meanwhile, I've asked for another credit card number.
A quick glance at my various cts over the years should
reveal someone rather dull and not given to making false claims.
I think this is the first time I've posted a complaint
about billing issues.
|
12-04-18 09:37pm
|
Reply
12
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
$9.95? that appealed to my lickpenny personality.
Having downloaded what I wanted, we had to cancel via VXNBill. (Previously know as rocketgate).
Had to provide my zip code, full name, email and the first six and last four of the credit card. Was suspicious, as this is two-thirds of the card's numbers..but I wanted to cancel. Oh, and after coughing up this data we had to wait 14 minutes for live chat to confirm my cancellation.
Three minutes later there's a call from Visa to confirm that I'm buying jewellery in Tokyo.
We're in upstate New York.
Hence, beware vixen.com
|
11-29-18 10:10pm
|
Reply
13
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review (again).
I was the token straight friend of a lesbian couple back in the 90s.
Each claimed to have not used dildos either then or in previous relationships.
Their main gripe re porn was that the sex was too short. Three quarters of an hour
was common for their bedroom antics.
Tribbing was an integral part of their sex lives. I was bummed when they
moved four time zones away.
SE is one of just two lesbo site I've joined. I'm due for a m'ship again. I've always gotten off to their rimming scenes. But the percentage of non white women on display is small.
|
10-07-18 09:01pm
|
Reply
14
|
Boy Crush
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Review
Ten, twelve years ago, BC had some of the cutest twinks on earth. But with strong competition from Staxus, Helix etc they are now a B grade studio on the best days. From the beginning their lighting has been harsh. Like a bus station. No candle lit or outdoor scenes here. An old girlfriend mentioned several years ago that with the arrival of HD, several models disappeared whom she felt had the telltale signs of heroin addiction. Nice review again from you.
|
08-23-18 04:00pm
|
Reply
15
|
Boy Crush
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
What I think is more prevalent is straight men with a background in straight porn doing gay escort work. Working for years as a photographer I heard anecdotally of guys building a rep in porn then earning the majority of their income via escorting men.
|
08-23-18 03:48pm
|
Reply
16
|
EU Twinks
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Reply
Agreed with all yer points. Yet I wouldn't be signing on without PU's discount price.
|
07-04-18 05:14pm
|
Reply
17
|
EU Twinks
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Review
At last: a coherent explanation to what you termed smorgasbord sites.
Hodge-podge is another description I've read. Anyways...the site has no free preview!
What a bunch of lazy shits. Clicking anywhere on the initial screen brings ya to the sign up page.
Meanwhile, its another good review from you.
|
07-03-18 07:39pm
|
Reply
18
|
Sexy Hub
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
This slice of life was more interesting than any review I have posted.
"....learn to talk to people with their mouth." Bemused resignation here.
|
05-21-18 09:00am
|
Reply
19
|
Boys Fuck Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Reply
Had not heard of fuck hot boys until your review.
I would of assumed that the oringinal mike of mike18 fame had aged out of twink
videos by now. Would be happy to be proven wrong (again). Keep them reviews
comin'.
|
04-14-18 01:37pm
|
Reply
20
|
Fuck Hot Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Review
Where to begin?
This seemed like the Met-Art of twink porn
in 1999. Since then..well your review laid
it all out.
Whom would want this site name on
their credit card bill?
|
04-13-18 10:01pm
|
Reply
21
|
Boys Fuck Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Comment
...I don't know if I'll take the plunge.. thirty clams is a tad high for
so-so res. The site previews show vanilla sex on Salvation Army grade furniture. Yet I'm so tired of seeing 20 year old gals at other sites being mounted by dudes old enough to be their fathers.
|
04-13-18 09:55pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
..agreed with previous cts...cunnilingus doesn't photograph well.
|
04-13-18 09:39pm
|
Review
23
|
Private Classics
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Photo sets from the 1960s and '70s display a playfulness, a carefree approach to hanky panky only possible in a HIV free era.
-1st month is under 21 bucks with PU's discount.
-Ah, memories: For those of a certain age, Private XXX magazines were the first taste of hardcore. VHS was still years away.
-Attn youngsters: see what postal inspectors used to devote thousands of work hours to intercept. |
| Cons: |
-Tagline .."..since 1965." yet the oldest videos only date to the late 1980s.
-Eye-watering, mind-boggling, erection-softening effect of clothes, hairdos, household interiors & infrequent shaving from the 60s and 70s. |
| Bottom Line: |
By the late 1980s, Private was on the cusp of cranking out a steady flow of hardcore films with high production values often filmed at exotic locations. To get to that future, Private had to shoot sets that, while not in the same league as say 'Deepthroat' or Playboy, kept the studio lights on, the staff paid. These are the results.
As stated the oldest vids date only to the late 1980s. That's my guess as none carry the production year. Obviously porn stars are desired when fresh then less so as they grow shop-worn then face a transition period when they are either snicked at or admired for their locked in an era appearance. IMAO the gals featured in this 1986-9 stuff have a way to go, dare I say ten years?, before they can be considered hot or even retro by today's audience. |
|
04-08-18 05:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
No competitor here in Brigadoon, USA
|
04-02-18 08:57pm
|
Reply
25
|
R18.com
(0)
|
Reply of
wannabe's Review
Unacceptable is the word! The last time a site pulled this stunt on me was circa 2002.
|
04-01-18 09:44am
|
