| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
^I would say none of these. I'll use as my point of reference my favorite Bond...Sean Connery. He was 32, a talented actor who was still relatively unknown so no previous roles that could overshadow his performance. Idris is 44 years old so his life expectancy as a viable Bond character is quite short. Tom is young enough but has played the character of Loki too many times for people to overlook that. especially when he will play it at the same time as he would Bond. Tom I find looks too brutish to pass as a decent Bond. Henry is too wooden and will be known as the failed Superman long after he wishes it weren't so. That leaves us with Michael Fassbender who if he wasn't so well known might have been a good Bond and might be able to pull it off but he is too popular an actor to be asked or be interested.
What is far more important than who plays Bond is that they have to start making fun Bond movies. At his core Bond was a womanizing tough guy who had a brain and knew when to have fun. Daniel never looked like he had any fun and they certainly never shot any of his Bond movies as tough fun should be part of it. It's not like the Pierce Brosnan Bond movies were decades before Casino Royale. It was four years. We went from funny banter to dour no Bond girl.
|
11-03-16 03:30pm
|
Review
352
|
VideosZ
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Huge library of 18,000 movies and more or over 105,000 scenes to choose from.
+They add three new movies per day.
+Over 13,000 performers to choose from ranging in age, enthnicity, appearance and place of birth.
+ You can download all the scenes in MP4 and the resolution varies but usually 640 x480 is the best for older scenes.
+There are now over 20,000 1080p HD scenes on the site to download.
+You get to see up to a months worth of futur updates.
+Movies/scenes can be streamed online.
+Each scene is tagged with multple keyords that help narrow results when searching those keywords.
+The search engine allows to search by performers name, studio, keywords to name a few.
+Site is not overly crowded with third party advertising.
+They manage to offer studios not available on videobox and they don't expect you to pay more to get access to their entire library. |
| Cons: |
-Scene tagging could use improvement. As it is searching by keywords is never going to give you as good a return as I would like.
-A huge percentage of updates is older content and sometimes it is actually many years old and that includes the more recent updates as well.
-A large percentage of the newer updates is actually content taken from various websites so it's important to make sure you don't already have that on your computer.
-Content is not exclusive as this site shares a decent amount of movies with videobox.
-The older content is starting to show it's age and they haven't bothered to remaster any of it so that's not going to change.
-They can't seem to offer a studios entire library of content which can be quite frustrating.
-There is a lot of duplication of content within the site in large part because one studio sold the rights to another and the same scene can be found under more than one studio. |
| Bottom Line: |
*My last review is fours year old and it wouldn't surprise me if that is also the length of time since I was last a member. I can safely say that as far as I can see absolutely nothing has changed in regards to site design and ease of use which is a good thing because changes aren't always positive. It's simple, uncluttered and rather easy to find a decent amount of content without doing too much research. Of course adding more keywords to the scenes and making sure they are accurate would definitely help.
*It would be nice if they tried to Remaster some of the older content.
*One of the advantages with joining this site is that you get access to some studios like VB don't have and unlike VB that teases it's customer with content that they can see but don't actually have access to. VideosZ is kinder because you get all of the content for one amount and no request to upgrade membership.
*The adding of HD is sure to please many people but be forewarned that a percentage of these scenes is actually content taken from websites.
*I think this site is a must for anyone that is interested in getting more than what they paid for because you clearly get this when you join VideosZ. |
|
10-31-16 06:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I'll second Drooler's comment.
|
10-28-16 06:39pm
|
Reply
354
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
The first thing you would notice is that I prefer porn that is usually five years and older. In fact it's likely to be 10 years and older. After that you would notice that lesbian and b/g anal is a recurring theme.
|
10-27-16 05:31pm
|
Reply
355
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Ads in the members area a more of a pet peeve than anything else because the others are more serious issues that will likely cause me to avoid joining that site.
|
10-20-16 06:06pm
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thank You for that one. You made me laugh.
|
10-20-16 05:52pm
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I picked sometimes but the number of so called cuckold scenes in my collection can be counted using one hand. It's one of those fetishes that I never really understood and rarely find appealing.
|
10-18-16 06:33pm
|
Reply
358
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Scenes should always begin with fully dressed.
|
10-16-16 09:34am
|
Reply
359
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's usually not a big issue for most sites but it can be if the site has a huge library of content and the design makes it very difficult to find it or surf through it.
|
10-10-16 06:05pm
|
Reply
360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Although in your case there is always the possibility that some of your favorite magazines were digitized and exist somewhere on the net.
VHS porn movies didn't necessarily get the same chance and sadly those that did simply don't look all that clean and crisp now.
|
10-08-16 07:04pm
|
Reply
361
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Since I haven't been a member in many years than I can't be 100% sure but I suspect the guy behind this site and backroom casting couch has not changed his style since when I was last a member so I can tell you that it's fake. That's not to say that some of the women who appear here aren't also college students but that is incidental to the scene because for all intense and purposes they are amateur porn performers. The one thing this guy has going for him is that the women he hires are all amateurs to most porn fans. My gut feeling is that many of the women are cam models looking to increase their profile and by creating a larger fan base for their cam career. Not being a fan of cam sites makes it hard for me to confirm that comment but one thing is certain. The vast majority(about 99.9%) never do any other porn scenes.
Some of the girls are quite nice looking but for me the POV, bad camera angles and blurting of the male performer make most of the scene unwatchable and that's why I have never returned to this site or backroom casting couch.
|
10-08-16 07:01pm
|
Reply
362
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I picked lost it but the truth is that I threw it away. We are going way back when porn was on VHS tapes and at some point I decided to get rid of it and let me tell you that there were movies in that collection that I have never found and probably never will.
|
10-08-16 06:50pm
|
Reply
363
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
EverNight's Reply
Actually I notice that they actually do have 1080p HD on their site. They have done some changes in the last few days and I will modify my review to reflect this new info. Thank You for your very important comment.
|
10-05-16 05:44pm
|
Reply
364
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I really like playing cribbage. computer games, platform games, flash games, games on my tablet and board games.
|
10-04-16 03:24pm
|
Reply
365
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Now that you mention it. I should have picked a different metaphor. One that does not involve chocolate sauce and the words cherry and anal.
|
10-04-16 03:19pm
|
Reply
366
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
EverNight's Reply
It's actually 1280 x 720.
|
10-04-16 03:16pm
|
Review
367
|
Evil Angel
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+There are currently over 2260 movies (over 11000 scenes) and they add on average about 20 movies per month.
+They hire some of the most popular performers in the industry and they offer a wide variety of models from age, ethnicity to body shape.
+You can stream the movies online.
+You can download the scenes in multiples resolutions from 240p all the way to 1080P. The 1080P Hd is more or less on movies release after 2011 and highest resolution for the older content is only 480p.
+Content is dated (Date isn't necessarily the production date).
+You have multiple methods of searching for content: Name of performer, category of sex scene, series and movie title.
+You can view the upcoming movies for the next two weeks. |
| Cons: |
-Site needs to be cleaned up and streamlined. It's clustered with banners that lead to the sites own content or to third party partners.
-A lot of the content prior to 2010 is not available on this site.
-Data like performer name, sexual fetish and others is missing from older content.
-Using the search options will not necessarily give you all the correct results.
-A lot of the content is anal centric.
-Content is not exclusive. |
| Bottom Line: |
*There are currently few sites that come close to Evil Angel when it comes to the total number of original content updated on a regular basis. The fact that they still produce such a large amount of quality porn in a era when other studios can't even release a portion of their content is even more impressive.
*In the last few years EA started concentrating on using a limited amount of directors to produce their movies. That can be a huge advantage for fans who like these peoples movies but it can also be a big issue if you happen to not dislike their brand of porn because that automatically means that a large portion of EA's library is lost to them. I'm more on the side of those that enjoy many of their active directors but I must confess that I sometime wish that there would be a bigger variety. This is for all intense and purposes pure gonzo porn with a major emphasis on anal. To give you an idea almost 1600 movies contain at least one anal scene and some is anal only.
*I'm sure that I could find plenty to nit pic but ultimately they are overshadowed by the sheer quantity and quality of content available on this site. The fact that we get a very nice rebate with TBP/PU is just the cherry on top of the sundae. |
|
10-03-16 07:28pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
368
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I currently have three memberships because there is still an overlap with the cancelled and active ones.
|
10-02-16 09:45am
|
Reply
369
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I feel less guilty about watching it than I do about the looking for it. It's easy to waste hours looking for porn sites that might have a modicum of interesting porn or to search through an existing site to find porn that I would care to watch.
|
09-30-16 03:27pm
|
Reply
370
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Mostly evenings but sometime during the day on weekends.
|
09-30-16 03:25pm
|
Reply
371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I can't pick just one channel because I can find something worth watching on about every channel. Not every day and nothing that is remotely close to reality TV.
|
09-26-16 03:08pm
|
Reply
372
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
It's a mix. There are some great ones and there are some terrible ones.
|
09-22-16 05:52pm
|
Reply
373
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not usually but I will work harder to find as many recent reviews as possible to reassure myself that it's an anomaly and not a sign of disregard toward customer satisfaction. Needless to say that no review whatsoever might be the catalyst that makes me skip joining that site.
|
09-18-16 10:08am
|
Reply
374
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'll only second what Drooler and lk2fireone have written.
|
09-16-16 07:03pm
|
Reply
375
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I think Mofo started to see a significant reduction in new members while seeing more and more members not remaining longer and they saw an opportunity to keep those existing members all the while still attracting the unsuspecting new ones or even those aware that new members can only stream the content. I guess it must work because they have been doing this for a while now and haven't changed their policy.
Mind you they are owned by Mindgeek who makes most of their money through the streaming of stolen content broadcasted on their various tube sites. maybe they don't care if one of their sites makes little if any money.
|
09-14-16 06:11pm
|
