| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
376
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ There are now over 420 videos to choose from.
+ Still the only site dedicated to this type of fetish.
+ Content is for the vast majority still exclusive (see cons).
+ You can stream all the videos online.
+ You can download all the videos in MP4 and resolution is from low 512 x 288 all the way to HD 1280 x 720p.
+ They even offer the possibility of downloading the videos in four smaller sections in both MP4 and WMV.
+ They have a surprisignly decent selection of models that are willing to do this type of fetish.
+ Content is dated and they update every two weeks.
+ You get access to the entire Kink network now(see Cons).
+ You can search by models name. |
| Cons: |
- Their navigation is now a huge mess because the only way to see more content is clicking on the "more" button but all this does is open more videos on the main page.
- The content is no longer truly exclusive since members of VB can also buy the Kink channel and you will find a small portion of this sites content on that channel.
- It's true that you now get access to the entire Kink library but the cost is 50$ to join and fans of this site may not care for any of the other sites so a pretty steep price for just one site.
- This is a video only site so fans of photosets need to look elsewhere.
- Not enough kissing.
- Many of the performer have body art. |
| Bottom Line: |
*It's been a long time since I reviewed this site and I thought it was due an update. In some ways it's better that I review it now than a few months ago because some of the changes at Kink have taken effect and they affect the final score.
*If you are a fan of women who have sex with transsexuals than your options are basically this site or joining Evil Angel who releases the odd video with the same fetish. The good news is that this site is a significantly better option because the same women appearing in the EA videos are already on this site, may even have more than one scene and the sex scenes are better here.
*Each video has a small scenario which often adds a lot to the final product. The various camera angles allows us to see the action from multiple sides and perspectives. One of my pet peeves is that I wish there was more kissing. It's not that there isn't some already and sometimes there is a lot but overall I can't help but feel that the players want to skip over that part of the scene. Most of the transsexuals do a more than adequate job during the penetration part of the scene but for some there is visible limpness and that can reduces the heat level of the scene or can even ruin it.
*This site is sort of easy to recommend because unlike other porn sites with a more common type of sex scene that's found elsewhere. There is no equivalent to TS Pussy. If you are a fan of this type of fetish than you have to join at the very least once. You will probably do like me and join multiple times. That's not a bad idea now that you get access to the entire Kink network. I'm sure you will enjoy some of their other sites as well. |
|
09-12-16 06:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
377
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
This is a common theme in lesbian porn but as far as I can remember it has always been rare in b/g porn. The only place where you still see plenty of taboo father/daughter or brother/sister porn is on various clips4sale stores. That's the good news for fans of that kind of taboo. The bad news is that the cost per videos makes it hard to buy on a regular basis. The other negative is what exotic said about the same performers playing most of the roles.
|
09-12-16 03:51pm
|
Reply
378
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Take the following with a grain of salt. If you go to TBP's review of Mofo and scroll to the bottom of the page. You will see that X3Guide has a September 2016 review that claims that you can upgrade your membership to VIP status in the members section which would allow downloads. Of course that now means that your 20$ membership will go up to 30$. You have to decide if it's worth it. The other thing to consider is that existing members have the download option available to them but do they have to pay 30$ or did they negotiate their price prior to quitting the site.
|
09-11-16 10:16am
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'm mostly indifferent but in many ways this is not something I often think about because there aren't many performers that have one at the moment.
|
09-10-16 06:18pm
|
Reply
380
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Not really. I get annoyed with some drivers but to actually get so angry that I lose the ability to think is just not worth it. Mind you I have been the victim of a road rage incident. Luckily for me the guy got tired of being a complete ass and kept going on his merry little way but there were a few seconds there when I thought he's going to cause an accident. I have also been witnessed to more than a few road rage incidents.
|
09-08-16 02:52pm
|
Reply
381
|
Kink.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Another excellent review. I'm afraid that the God awful navigation prevents me from scoring any Kink site above 90 and in all likelihood doom them to get scores that will vary between 80 and 90. The only reason I wasn't more critical of my recent review of EB is because EB is a more recent site so less clicking ans scrolling to do.. I already know that my score will have to be lower when I review Whipped Ass because there are double the number of scenes and having to click and scroll for a couple of minutes to reach the bottom of the page of content is not unacceptable in 2016.
P.S: I could be wrong but I believe that the reason why you see a buy shoot is because the content belongs to another company. I notice that they have some Evil Angel videos available and it makes sense that you have to purchase them. Mind you it's cheaper to join EA but maybe some prefer to go this route. I notice they have some old Chanta's Bitches videos which I think are also videos you must buy. if that's the case than they are sort of cheating a little because I think they sort of bought them when Chanta stopped doing porn many years ago.
|
09-07-16 03:26pm
|
Reply
382
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
What lk2fireone said. I'll only add why would you even want to? I can sort of understand having sex in a public bathroom (Icky gross) because there is the thrill of doing something taboo in public place but a reason for jerking off escapes me.
|
09-06-16 03:28pm
|
Review
383
|
Everything Butt
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+The scenes are long with most of them going over an hour.
+There is an impressive selection of models to choose from and they aren't limited to Caucasian women.
+Videos can be streamed online.
+All videos are downloadable in the MP4 format and come in the low resolution of 512 x 296 and all the way to HD 1280x720.
+They also offer multiple scenes version of the videos which you can download in the MP4 and WMV format (I guess for people with slower internet speeds).
+Content is dated |
| Cons: |
-The only way to see the older videos is by using the "more" button which doesn't actually bring you to another page but adds content to the one and only available page.
-The only way to leave a video is to use the back button which will bring you back to the very top of the page you were on in the beginning requiring you to use the "more" button all over again.
-This is extreme anal penetration porn so not necessarily for every fan of anal.
-You can no longer just join this site but must join the entire network which can be an issue for some people.
-There is no real search option except for the name of the model but you will get all the scenes she shot for Kink which can be a lot for some models
-As of July 26 2016 they no longer update once a week but every two weeks. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is the quintessential site for fans of anal fisting/anal insertion of large objects. There are currently no other sites like this one so it is hard to compare with other sites but if we concentrate on more extreme anal penetration sites than the one major difference between this site and those is that you get a definite sense that Kink wants their models to enjoy what they are doing. That's an important aspect for me because I'm not into pain in my porn viewing.
*I can understand why Kink chose to change their business model when it comes to membership. It must have been common for a person to join more than one Kink site at a time so the new price which includes all of the Kink sites is a similar deal to those who joined two Kink sites in the past. The downside is that I'm certain there were those who only joined one Kink site. The new price makes it probably too expensive for them now.
*I suspect that they may be working on their site design because I know that last month you could scroll through pages of content as opposed to using only the "more" button. I hope that they figure something soon because they deservedly lost 7 points on their score just because of that. I had to use the "more" button 20 times to reach the first EB video so imagine how many times you will have to hit that button on older sites like Whipped Ass.
*They lost another 5 points because they stopped updating once a week. Just because you can download videos from other Kink sites while waiting for your EB video is no excuse to only update every two weeks
***Although there are a lot of annoying negative things about this site as it currently stands. It is still well worth joining. Just maybe less often than in the past.*** |
|
09-05-16 07:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I'll add my voice to the all of the above. I can't help but feel that all of these things seem momre like methods to inflict pain and humiliation than to stimulate the woman. I don't want to be overly critical but where's the fun in looking at someone in pain or being treated like a piece of crap?
|
09-04-16 11:00am
|
Reply
385
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I love most of them but there was something special about Carlin.
|
09-01-16 04:17pm
|
Reply
386
|
N/A
|
Reply of
XXX Customer's Poll
It's definitely more than 1 TB and less than 3 TB.
|
08-29-16 05:17pm
|
Reply
387
|
Sins Life
(0)
|
Reply of
vipguy's Comment
I feel obligated to point out that TBP's July 2016 review clearly states that videos are streaming only. I would add that the review site "Porn Inspector" did a review Aug 21 and they also claim that videos are streaming only. Until TBP actually changes their review to reflect what is commented here. I would take it as Gospel that videos CANNOT be downloaded.
|
08-28-16 09:37am
|
Reply
388
|
Sins Life
(0)
|
Reply of
vipguy's Review
Here are some things you may want to consider when writing a review.
1-If you are going to score a site in the 90's than make sure your review is detailed as to show why you gave the site such a high score.
In your case this is especially important because your score is much higher than TBP or any other review site.
2-You claim that you can download content and you even added a comment but based on what is stated on TBP,s July review and what is clearly written on Johnny and Kissa's site. Videos can only be streamed. No downloads. Hopefully TBP can confirm your statement and then maybe someone can advise the webmaster of the results as this is a major change on the services offered by the site.
3-I can't be certain if the content is truly exclusive but a large portion of it is many years old. Johnny has been a performer for a decade and some of the scenes on this site are from stuff he shot with other performers years ago. I will add that if the site is not downloadable than I am certain that a large part of the content is not exclusive because other streaming sites have those Johnny videos on their site.
4-They have a blog section which is rarely updated and last piece of info is nearly 3 months old.
5-You can see all the available videos but no way to preview any of them and the only preview video you are offered is a 2 minutes mish mash of a couple of their videos to a soundtrack that is loud and annoying.
6-There are 10 icons that pertain to a certain type of scene and none of them work because they all bring you to the join page.
7-Not that there is anything seriously wrong with uploading in a weird order but the most recent video on the site is titled "the day before Kissa's birthday". The problem is that her birthday is on June 22 so why release it two months after the fact?
Do you see why writing a less than detailed review can make what might be a very promising site look like a scam. I don't know if it is but if the videos do turn out to not be downloadable than it will be really hard to justify charging 30$ for a streaming only site.
|
08-27-16 11:02am
|
Reply
389
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably the number one thing for me is that the model appear to enjoy what she is doing. For that reason I am unable to enjoy what I consider to be misogynist style porn. Facial Abuse which I guess felt the need to soften their name are now calling themselves face fucking would be the prime example of a site that I detest. That is saying something when you consider that I enjoy quite a few of Kink's content.
|
08-23-16 06:02pm
|
Reply
390
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I think waiting is probably a wise decision at this moment but I'm sure you know that the 10$ join price is unlikely to remain as is. At some point they will raise it.
I like the company responsible for this site but not sure if it will ever make it on my wish list. Now if they were to do a lesbian site than they would have me as a customer.
|
08-23-16 05:46pm
|
Reply
391
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I think the problem you have is that you used the PU link and for whatever reason that does not bring you directly to the site but to a tube preview version of the site. A legal tube version of the site since it is only showing content from Vixen and you can only join vixen but that said I do find that this is in some ways a little bit of false advertising as only one of the clickable icons will bring you to Vixen.com where you can clearly see that they currently have only 14 updates with one coming up tomorrow. The join price is only 10$ so I don't have any issue with what they are doing.
|
08-21-16 10:27am
|
Reply
392
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I really don't like it and seeing as it's never been all that popular than I guess I'm not alone in thinking that. The only Country I can think of that seems to absolutely love bukkakes is Germany. Not sure why.
|
08-17-16 03:18pm
|
Reply
393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
No I don't because it was a long time ago and in all likelihood was someone from National Geographic so not really a true nude model.
|
08-15-16 03:38pm
|
Reply
394
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
All great examples but these women all have on thing in common and it's that they never really did a lot of hardcore (if any) porn. I'd also like to add that they were all pre-2008 when it was possible to have an long term porn career without doing hardcore. I don't think that is possible now and hasn't been for many years. You can still do solo and softcore with a some midcore stuff but the opportunities will be few and far between so making huge sums of money will be next to impossible.
The harsh reality for sanyone who is considering a career in the porn industry and only doing stuff that is not more intense than midcore is likely doomed to fail which is too bad because once upon a time you had many studios that were dedicated to the more artistic aspect of porn (I think using the term porn is incorrect when talking about these sites) because they don't really exist all that much anymore.
If a girl wants any kind of porn career than hardcore has to be an option. Otherwise she will get plenty of offers in the beginning but these will quickly disappear and the money she will make on those softcore jobs will not be all that great.
|
08-07-16 09:31am
|
Reply
395
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I think only Brazzer and I can't say that I was disappointed but these days I don't think I would do that again. At least not for Brazzer.
|
08-07-16 09:12am
|
Reply
396
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I prefer gradually because this way you have the anticipation factor where has if she does it all from the get go than what is left except to see her do same thing but with different people.
Of course I'm talking about gradually doing newer stuff over a period of maybe 12-16 months and not many years.
|
08-03-16 03:59pm
|
Reply
397
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I must also be weird because I like Monahan's suggestion. I would add that if she doesn't want to talk shop than frankly any subject would be open since it's useless to have a conversation with someone if they aren't interested or comfortable talking about that subject.
|
08-03-16 03:54pm
|
Reply
398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
What Drooler wrote.
|
07-31-16 06:11pm
|
Reply
399
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I know it's frustrating to wait but I think 48 hours is an acceptable time to wait for a site to fix what may be a huge issue.
|
07-29-16 05:48pm
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Poll
None of the above since the only thing I care about is that my favorite site is able to survive.
|
07-29-16 05:47pm
|
