| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
726
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Thank God it doesn't happen very often because the scene is ruined when it does.
|
10-13-14 09:22am
|
Reply
727
|
Aussie Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Of course if you had than you wouldn't have taken one for the team and maybe other people would have joined what looks to be a rather very disappointing site.
I've done it more than once and I always take comfort in the fact that my loss is also the site's loss because my review turns people away.
|
10-12-14 05:28pm
|
Reply
728
|
Aussie Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review
Thanks for the review because you took a bullet for the some other people that might have wanted to join but will hold off now that they know what they are getting for their money. It took me less than 10 seconds to know that the site wasn't worth it because the second scene is one starring Lexi belle who has been retired for about a year now. Then I looked at their blog and the last post is about 4 months old.
|
10-12-14 10:34am
|
Reply
729
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I grant you that face fucking is probably in a class all of it's own and should not be used when describing other sites but some of the stuff assylum does sort of reminds me of the stuff I saw on FF. It doesn't look like they are out to degrade the talent like FF but it is very hard to walk the line when you are shooting some very extreme stuff.
Both sites are located in the North East so far away from California and therefore that may appeal to performers that live in that part of the US and commute to CA when they want to do porn. I think that is one of the reasons why FF is still able to get performers because if they were in the valley than most girls would avoid them like the plague.
As to why some girls shoot more than one scene. I personally think that they accept to shoot for FF more than once because they are in desperate need of cash and foolishly choose to shoot for them a second time. Normal porn is already hard on the performers so I don't want to imagine what an FF shoot must be like.
|
10-12-14 10:27am
|
Reply
730
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think starting a new one may be more interesting because it would allow everyone to start fresh and more importantly won't require people to read back multiple pages to see where the thread was going.
Mind you the forum is almost a non-entity these days. There are so few people posting stuff that it's coming to the point where it won't be worth it to bother looking at it. I'm just as guilty as everybody else because I rarely bother writing stuff.
|
10-11-14 10:59am
|
Reply
731
|
Out Of The Family
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I actually bought the Lone Ranger so you can imagine how stupid I feel. It's bad but not in a way that you can laugh at it's awfulness.
I actually enjoyed the first two movies but the third one was where they lost me as a possible customer. I will never watch another Bay Transformer movie in a theater or buy it on dvd.
I know that sooner or later I will join fame digital again if only because it's only 5$ but it's likely more for some of their older stuff that I haven't downloaded than anything new.
|
10-08-14 05:55pm
|
Reply
732
|
Out Of The Family
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I get at least 3 offers a week from various sources but never for this site. It's usually Rocco's or Devil Films. It's a 5$ offer so I should be thrilled and yet I still don't join because the main site whose movies I used to like is Devil Films and sadly they almost never update. I consider them to be so close to deaths door that it's almost the same.
|
10-08-14 01:55pm
|
Reply
733
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Although I agree with Drooler that it would be okay if he had something worthwhile to say but they never do and that is why I really dislike it.
|
10-07-14 03:14pm
|
Reply
734
|
Porn Megaload
(0)
|
Reply of
SCORE's Reply
Thanks You very Much for replying to my review. I was getting very nervous. I used your suggestion of the live chat on eboobstore and May in your service department was able to help me. Hopefully whatever is wrong with Megaload will be fixed. Sadly this episode probably means that I will never join another score site because I'm not going through this again.
|
10-06-14 01:49pm
|
Reply
735
|
Porn Megaload
(0)
|
Reply of
SCORE's Reply
1-I'm in Canada so the 800 number your are mentioning is not going to help me and there is no way that I'm paying for a phone call to cancel a membership. Especially not a 50$ membership.
2-I don't use Skype so that's a no go
3-I'm not using a fax because I would again have to pay for the call and frankly that is just a bigger pain than anything else.
4-I don't know if anybody in your tech department is paying attention but the members service is not working very well as that is the first place I went when I wanted to cancel. The site couldn't find my info so I emailed the support desk twice over a 48 hrs period without a reply. It is now about 96 hrs later and still no reply.
5-I would finally like to point out that the following message is on the members service page: Need live help? We're available Monday-Friday 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM EST at 1-800-967-2673. Immediate help with password problems can be found 24/7 by using the links listed below. Now being your average guy IO would assume that since it does not mention that this 800 is only valid in the US that it would also be valid in Canada but it is not or worse it's no longer in service. I know because I tried it twice.
|
10-06-14 01:46pm
|
Review
736
|
Porn Megaload
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
10-07-14 03:23pm (Update History)
Reason: issue with cancellation was a major technical issue and seems to be fixed for everyone
|
| Pros: |
+There are currently nearly 1560 scenes to choose from.
+All the content is dated and they update with 1-4 new videos each day.
+You can download all the videos in 4 different resolution:320x240, 640x360, 854x480 and 1280x720 but some of the newer ones can also be downloaded in true HD 1920x1080.
+They offer a huge variety of models from teens to older milfs and with body types from petite all the way to BBW.
+There is no third party advertising on the site and advertising for it`s other sites isn`t too intense either. |
| Cons: |
-They borrow/steal content from many of their other Score sites so it`s very important for past members to make sure they don`t already have those scenes.
-They offer the ability to search by keywords but the scenes don't have actual keywords tagged to them so the results you get aren`t all the ones you should if it worked properly.
-There is no way of knowing which videos are in WMV and which ones are in MP4. You would think that all the recent ones would be in MP4 but they are not.
-I don't normally use cost as a con but the join price for this site is 50$ which is more than twice the cost of any of their other sites and since the content is mostly all from SCoreHD than why make it so much more expensive?
-There is no kissing between the men and women but there is in the g/g stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is basically the same site as ScoreHD but with some content taken from their other sites that was not offered when it was called ScoreHD. I think it's basically stuff from Score 50 plus that has been added. That's a plus for some people because that was one of my complaints but you aren't getting much of Score50 content and you are paying twice as much as you did for any of their other Score sites
*I notice that TBP's review list 1749 videos but I only counted 1555 while TBP says there are 1749 so what happened to those 200 scenes that I did not see? I counted using the latest scene icon so maybe there are really 1749 videos if you use another option.
*The videos are all top notch with some very good camera angles, excellent lighting and a nice flow to the scenes. The downside is that there's no kissing between the men and women which removes a lot of the chemistry that would be there with some kissing. The strange thing is that there is kissing in the g/g stuff.
*Scene breakdown is: 662 solo only scenes, 18 are g/g only and the rest are hardcore b/g. There are 328 scenes starring BBW and 159 starring MILFs.
I have amended my review by removing anything to do with the difficulty in cancelling because I truly believe that it was never intentional on their part to make it next to impossible to cancel. I received what I consider to be the best support anybody could hope to get and I am very impressed with Score. I have also increased my score as a large part of the low score was about cancellation issues. |
|
10-05-14 11:02am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
737
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It is very important for me because I find that all videos are improved by the addition of multiples camera angles. By default that means that a video that has only one or few angles is likely to be a bit of a disappointment to me. That's not always the case but you need someone with a lot of talent behind the camera to make sure the scene is good.
|
10-05-14 09:34am
|
Reply
738
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Like I said. You can be forgiven for not looking too deeply seeing as this is a well established site. At least now you may rad the error reports prior to joining other established sites. I tend to always be very cautious when the words :free trial: are used.
|
10-04-14 06:25pm
|
Reply
739
|
Porn Megaload
(0)
|
Reply of
kyote1's Comment
I'm having the same issue and that is bound to affect the score I give the site and it will show up in my review. I've issued an error report on TBP.
|
10-04-14 10:16am
|
Reply
740
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Yes but wouldn't those women be more inclined to get the real thing as opposed to using a hand or a toy?
|
10-04-14 09:22am
|
Reply
741
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Now you can be forgiven for not doing it but I assume you didn't check out TBP's review prior to joining because there is more than one error report this year and it's all about the trial not being a full one. In fact 3 out of the 4 reports this year were about the trial not being a full one. Not sure if you paid more than 1$ but hopefully you didn't.
|
10-04-14 09:21am
|
Reply
742
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Younger women may do it as much as men but I suspect that older ones do not as much as their male counterpart.
|
10-03-14 02:44pm
|
Reply
743
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I would rather no one does it because I finds it offensive and strangely those terms are often only on the preview section and not really inside the site.
|
10-01-14 02:41pm
|
Reply
744
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I had to pick other because there wasn't an actual choice for what I wanted to say. Although I agree that anal is now so common that it may even surpass that of vaginal porn but I think the number is on the decline. I like anal porn or should I say I enjoy good anal porn. There is very little of the good kind when compared to the crappy one so I keep track of anal in all it's form and that's why I say that the number is on the decline. I don't think it has anything to do with peoples desire for anal as much as studios just don't want to pay the extra amount knowing that they won't make enough profit to warrant paying more money.
|
09-29-14 04:14pm
|
Reply
745
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
I just read on another forum comments made by the owner of the site and in case anyone had a doubt that the caning is real than I can confirm that it is because he said that a performers who agree to it will show marks of it on their body. It's not my cup of tea but it's still basically what the stuff Kink was shooting a little less than a decade ago so nothing new. They shoot out of NY so I don't hold a lot of hope that they can survive long term. Flying a California based performer to NY can't be cheap and this kind of porn must also be a little more expensive to shoot because you have to pay the performers more money.
|
09-27-14 05:46pm
|
Reply
746
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I didn't even consider that when I posted my comment but I guess it does fall under feedback. Mind you I'm also not sure if I'm talking to a webmaster or a support person.
|
09-27-14 05:37pm
|
Reply
747
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The only feedback I have given is when one of them comments on a review of their site.
|
09-27-14 10:39am
|
Reply
748
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I don't know about the rest of you but these days almost every site offers some kind of discount. The only thing that differentiates one from the next is the level of the discount.
|
09-25-14 03:50pm
|
Reply
749
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
graymane has already said what I was thinking.
|
09-24-14 03:13pm
|
Reply
750
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Let me first say thanks for the review. I'm glad you found a site that you enjoy. This is the kind of site that could get a high score from multiple people and it would still get a low score from me because I simply can't enjoy their brand of porn. Here is a partial list of why it would get a low score.
1-There are way too many visible pain marks on the body of the women for me to overlook them or get sexually stimulated.
2-The main character always wears a mask and I can't tell you how much that that annoys me.
3-Too much of their porn is circus acts that I thought was on the way out. I guess there must still be a market for someone to attempt bringing it back.
4-Too much of the porn is designed to demean the women and by default it makes it impossible for me to believe that they enjoy what's being done to them.
This site reminds me of the misogynistic stuff Facial Abuse is known for but here it's may alienate many performer who might otherwise have worked for them thinking it's like Kink. It's not by a long shot.
|
09-21-14 06:22pm
|
