| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1426
|
Jim Slip
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+All exclusif content.
+All content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+They started to offer videos in a single file rather than in small clips in 2009. That's about 175 videos out of 469.
+The 185 newer videos are offered in at least 720x408 resolution and they also offer them in 1280x720.
+All the photosets since October 2009 are now offered with a resolution of 2000x1343.
+They hire a good selection of models from most European Countries.
+They now offer Lara latex site with your membership.
+The addition of Lara's site means that you get some lesbian content as well as b/g. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest problem with this site is that they have never considered remastering their older content to at least offer the videos in a single file format rather than in multiple clips.
-Although you now get Lara's site. She does not update very often and the total number of scenes is only 32.
-The performers are only Jim and Lara so you may get tired of seeing only them in the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I keep returning to this site because they still put out decent suff and I keep hoping that they will remaster their older content. Until they do that then the site will always suffer a lower score than it could get if theyr tried to make some changes. The good news is that you now also get Lara's site included with your membership and that's not bad. Lara is Jim's wife and the person responsible for shooting his scenes in the same way that he's responsible for shooting her's. I wish she would update more often because she is a good performer and she does add some lesbian content which is always nice.
*The site hasn't done any changes since my last review (except adding Lara's site) so I can't really add more info than what's on my previous review. I will only say that Jim is geting older while the models he hires remain at about the same so you are getting an older man with young girls. I guess the same can be said for Lara except that she tends to go for older males and females over younger ones.
I've added a couple of points to my previous score because of the addition of Lara's site. |
|
12-23-12 05:47pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1427
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
Your suggestion was quite good. I was only trying to tell anyone who's a fan of Elegant Angel movies and who may not be aware that it's probably better to go with Elegant directly then it is to join VB since you'll get a lot more content for your money.
I'd much rather that VB add the older Elegant titles than the newer stuff since that's the stuff that I can't find anymore.
I also wish you a Merry Christmas and in case we don't talk for a while then an Happy New Year as well.
|
12-23-12 09:21am
|
Reply
1428
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Banks would never do that....Yes, they would. You could be right on that one because Epoch is by far the best one when it comes to doing Regional Pricing. Mind you it could also be NA that asked Epoch to charge more for foreign customers.
|
12-22-12 10:25am
|
Reply
1429
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I agree because although the amount is quite small. We are still talking about a 50 or so percent increase in the price for Non-US citizens. I don't know who their CC procesor is.
|
12-22-12 10:06am
|
Reply
1430
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
It's a kind of regional pricing but not as serious as some others. Of course not being as bad doesn't mean that it doesn't suck.
|
12-22-12 09:50am
|
Reply
1431
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
I do it quite frequently. I'm quite picky so the stuff that I usually keep is the best of what I downloaded abd i sure to excite me.
|
12-22-12 08:46am
|
Reply
1432
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Comment
Thanks for the info but I don't think it's such a good deal since VB was already offering Elegant movies prior to this. All they've done is add more recent titles but it's not really worth it since you can get all of these titles plus many more by simply joining Elegant Angel directly for 4$ more.
|
12-21-12 08:52pm
|
Reply
1433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I do less.
|
12-20-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
1434
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Me too. What I often do is if there is one site that I'm curious about but that there is no review then I will check the company and see if they have other reviews and that will help me decide if I want to try that site based on the score given to the other sites.
|
12-20-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
1435
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Unless I already know that information then it is something that I always check because I think that if a company sucks on one site then the chances are pretty good that they will suck on all of the other sites they own in the same way that if they have one great site then they probably have many great ones as well.
|
12-18-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
1436
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I haven't done so in a while now but I did before that and I'm sure I will start again soon. I want to clean out my hard drives because I have some duplicate content and I also have a lot of usueless stuff that I downloaded but will never watch again.
|
12-16-12 10:15am
|
Reply
1437
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I had to look up the word up before commenting but I don't think I have it since I'm in my mid 40's so liking older women is natural. Now if we are talking about teenagers and very young men liking much older women (ie in their 40's and above) then maybe there is in their case.
I have yet to undertand all these stories of 30yrs old women teahcers having sexuial affairs with their teenage students. In my day. Girls never dated guys that were younger than themeselves but I guess we live in a new world.
|
12-14-12 06:17pm
|
Reply
1438
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I don't know if they are removing their old stuff. They might but I hope not because if they do then they will have to completely remove everything. I believe that it's their futur content that will now be different.
|
12-13-12 03:43pm
|
Reply
1439
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not sure if I have ever donwloaded anything as high as 1920x1080 but I'm sure it would be the best but I usually limit my resolution to 640x480 or the 720p.
|
12-12-12 05:58pm
|
Reply
1440
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I also rarely read the post on their forum. It was from one of the many Kink threads on ADT. I haven't seen any official stuff yet but then again I didn't see anything until Brazzer yanked all of their BSDM themed stuff. I don't know if Mastercard is as hard nosed as Visa but it was a request from Visa that made Brazzer remove their content and it's again Visa.
|
12-12-12 05:57pm
|
Reply
1441
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I don't know if you heard but the site is about to go in a slightly different direction and remove the bound part from it's name and it's futur content. Rumor as it that Visa said they would no longer preocess CC for them if they didn't do thse changes so Kink being the smart company that they are. Simply changed things.
I believe the site will be called hard gangbangs. I actually like the change because the bound stuff never did much for me.
|
12-11-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
1442
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
mr3633's Reply
I am not a fan of POV porn. Never was and never will be but after discovering this site not too long ago and seeing all of the unknown models then it was just a question of time before I joined. There are some really hot women here and the sex is usually quite good.
The one thing that I would love to see and I know it will never happen is the addition of a camera operator.
|
12-10-12 06:12pm
|
Reply
1443
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I didn't mention piercings in my review but a couple of the models do sport some but they are rare. Of course since all the models are much older than what you like then unless you start to develop a taste for older models then I recommend you stay away.
|
12-10-12 06:09pm
|
Reply
1444
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can understand people who started smoking any time before the 70's and maybe even as late as the 80's because the studies on the dangers of smoking were not that common so you could still believe that it's not as dangerous as we now know but what is the excuse for anyone who started smoking after that? What is the reason why anyone is starting today?
I never started so I never had to quit but I did spend many years working in different smoke filled environments so I was subjected to second hand smoke for all those years which is not that good.
|
12-10-12 04:24am
|
Reply
1445
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I have a wide range of taste when it comes to almost everything in life and this includes porn. There are definetely no 18 years old because none of the models are below the age of 30 and I don't think there will be. Especially since they already have girls do porn to cover that market.
|
12-10-12 04:15am
|
Reply
1446
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
If you enjoy anal then I highly recommend that you avoid coming back because you will probably be very very disapointed. The current trend with the entire network is to no longer offer anal content on a regular basis. You counted Nine new scenes since September which makes it a little more than 10% of their new scenes are anal. That is a significant drop from previous years. Now I belive they have finally fixed their preview section so that you can now at least view their more recent updates so at least you won't feel cheated if you decide to join.
|
12-09-12 05:08pm
|
Review
1447
|
Mom POV
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Many of their models are true unknowns not seen on any other sites.
+They have an excellent mix of models and
+They update with one new video per week.
+All videos can be downloaded in MP4 with a 720x480 resolution.
+Most of the scenes are suprisignly well shot and the sex is often quite good.
+The site is about 2 years old and already has 108 videos.
+A decent percentage of thse milfs do anal.
+You can stream videos in 518x288, 720x405 and 1024x576. |
| Cons: |
-The title of the site makes it clear that you are only going to get POV shots.
-The navigation is basically choosing a page and then selecting one of the model on that page.
-The content is dated but you have to use a very convoluted way to know the date.
-There is also a scene description but you again have to find that in a convoluted way.
-There are absolutely no pics. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I'm pretty sure the people who own and operate girlsdoporn are also responsible for this site. Everything from the site design to the interview to filming style is identical in every aspect except that the guy who shoots for this site seems to know a lot more on how to use a camera than the guy who shoots for girldoporn. Now it is possible that it's the same guy but he does a far superior here than on the other site.
*Here are the important things you need to ask yourself to see if this is the kind of site you would enjoy.
1-Do you like older women(they have some 30years old but most of the women are in their 40's, 50's and even in their 60's.
2-Is body art a problem. Not all the models have ink but a large enough group does that if you have to have all natural then you may want to avoid.
3-Is POV shot porn a negative then avoid since it's all POV. I actually didn't mind it too much and I known for not liking POV.
4-Do you have to have HD content. They don't and even if it's available then I suspect that they do like GDP and make it available only to members who stay with the site for multiple months.
You'll know if you will enjoy the site based on how you answered the above questions or at least on how flexible you are on some of them. I know that I enjoyed the site and have no problem recommending it but there's plenty of room for improvement.
*The first thing would be the addition of an actual camera guy to get different shots but I guess that will never happen since it would make the sites name redundant. They should make the features on the preview section available to the paying members. It would save people like me from opening two seperate pages so that you know what the action in the video will be.
**I did recognize a couple of models from this site on some of Scores sites so they are not all unknowns. |
|
12-09-12 04:58pm
Replies (8)
|
Reply
1448
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
I never asked them but I know that it`s not something they came up with recently because they have had this name for many many years.
I`m not sure which came first. The studio shooting content only for the VHS/DVD market or the the one shooting content for internet/dvd.
|
12-09-12 09:58am
|
Reply
1449
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Was this your first time? How many new anal scenes have they added since September? As much as I loved this network. I know that I`ll never return because I consider them to be dead site when it comes to good new content. It`s still an amazing site for first timers.
|
12-09-12 09:49am
|
Reply
1450
|
N/A
|
Reply of
alexbrawn's Poll
My following statement will be only in reference to trials that offer access to all the same satuff a full member gets but is only limited in the time you get access to that content.
I think 2 two is probably the best because one is not worth it and three is likely too long for the site because you can allow an enterprising person the ability to download most of the sites library in a three day period and that would be bad for business. At least with two days. You get to see most of the sites stuff and can even download plenty of content but you aren't likely to get it all.
|
12-08-12 10:38am
|
