| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I recommend you visit Pierre Woodman's site and read the various post starting in late July/early August to get a better idea of the entire story but the gist of it is that Lana shot a casting with sex with Pierre and then did a WakeupNfuck video as well. She was booked to shoot two scenes in August. Pierre had negotiated with her and her agent to shoot one scene with three guys where there might have been a DAP and the a b/g with Manuel the next day or the day after that. everything was set-up, Lana arrived in Europe and sometime after that she got weird, lied to Pierre, left the Country and started to accuse him on social media of a slew of different things. One of which was rape or she at least implied it. Needless to say he didn't take it well. Especially when everything had been booked way ahead of time and there were no surprises.
Now you have a bunch of people that took Lana's side and that escalated the situation. Needless to say that Pierre is pissed at Lana and I can't help but feel that this is another bridge that she has burned. I don't know how many people remember that she was once represented by Mark Spiegler and he dropped her ass when she made a bunch of accusation that he was mistreating her.
|
10-02-17 03:30pm
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
Reply of
merc77's Reply
If I had to pick two shows out of my list than these two would be the ones that I'd pick. All the while knowing that the science behind Space 1999 made absolutely no scientific sense because the Moon would have had to travel at warp speed to reach the different planets it did during it's two year run. That said I really loved that show growing up. The Eagle was a classic spacecraft and one that could exist today. They had a kind of portable video phone with their communicator.
|
10-02-17 03:18pm
|
Reply
153
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Here is my short list of shows that I'd like to see remade.
Space 1999 would have to be changed to Space 2099 or 2199.
Buck Rodgers in the 25th Century. You wouldn't need to change anything.
UFO: A Gerry Anderson produced show about a secret Government agency called SHADO that combats the repeated attacks of a dying alien civilisation.
The Starlost: A Canadian produced show about a gigantic space Ark composed of hundreds of separate human habitats that has somehow gone off course and will crash into a star in the near future. Most often repeated phrase: Can I be of assistance.
Jason of Star Command: In many ways it was similar to Buck Rodgers except that the main character was from his time period.
Shows that I would to see remade but won't because they involve water.
Man From Atlantis and Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea. It can be argued that Voyage was remade by NBC when they made Seaview starring Roy Scheider.
|
10-02-17 11:00am
|
Reply
154
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I Can't see Mission Impossible coming back to TV as long as they are making movies and even after they do stop making them because many of the plot lines that were popular in the 60's would simply no longer make sense in 2017.
Network TV couldn't afford to pay the salary of all the stars you would need to make a new Laugh In show. Most of them are either too cheap or they make more money with reality TV.
|
10-02-17 09:33am
|
Reply
155
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Too Late. Rumor has it that The Weinstein company wants to make a remake/reboot starring Mark Wahlberg as the Six Billion Dollar Man. The film was originally scheduled for a Dec 2017 release but since they haven't actually started filming then don't expect this until 2018 at the earliest.
|
10-02-17 09:21am
|
Reply
156
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Take a look at the reply I give elephant later today.
|
10-02-17 08:57am
|
Reply
157
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have never and don't plan to for one simple reason. I don't want to meet any active performer because I might discover that they are miserable human beings and that would make watching them hard to impossible. I don't use any social media but even if I did then I would still avoid following any performer for the same reason.
I used to enjoy watching Lana Rhoades and what she did on social media to Pierre Woodman as soured my view to the point where I don't enjoy her anymore.
|
09-29-17 03:30pm
|
Reply
158
|
Butt Formation
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'll go one more. Even if we differed on most things. The one thing that we both have is common decency....That and good looks(I added that last one as a bonus). In fact the one thing that's been apparent since day one with the vast majority of PU members is decency. You may not be able to build a world with decency but you certainly can prevent it's destruction. Now if only my neighbors down south could remember that little piece of advice
|
09-29-17 03:24pm
|
Reply
159
|
Butt Formation
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Actually I'm an amazing salesman but I'm a better friend so I would rather lose a sale and retain a friendship.
|
09-27-17 06:34pm
|
Reply
160
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
More often than not I start with the most recent update and move toward the oldest.
|
09-27-17 09:58am
|
Reply
161
|
Butt Formation
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The only site that may be worth joining in the entire network is WCP Club but the two most important thing to consider before doing that is
1-You must be a fan on interracial porn because that's all they offer.
2-You are joining more for what's currently available and less for what is coming up because West Coast Production(WCP) is a dying studio.
|
09-27-17 08:18am
|
Reply
162
|
Butt Formation
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Actually based on rabbits review (see below link) it's a butt-centric site but not an anal one. Mind you even if it had was an anal site. I don't think it would be worth joining because if you look at all of the other sites owned by the parent company aren't very good or the content is old and getting older every day they stay active.
https://www.rabbitsreviews.com/s29377/Butt-Formation.html
|
09-25-17 06:02pm
|
Reply
163
|
N/A
|
Reply of
merc77's Reply
Not in my book. The only exception would be if it's a convertible and the top is down.
|
09-21-17 06:17pm
|
Reply
164
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
NICE REVIEW AND I RESPECT THE REASON FOR YOUR SCORE BUT I DISAGREE WITH IT BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT DESERVES THAT SCORE ANYMORE THAN I THINK ANY SITE THAT STOPPED UPDATING 7 YEARS AGO DESERVES A SCORE ABOVE 80%. NOW GRANTED THE TMW ACCESS MAKES THIS SITE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE APPEALING BUT I ARGUE THAT NO ONE WHO PAYS 15$ FOR JUST THIS SITE WOULD BE HAPPY WITH HIS PURCHASE AND INSTEAD WOULD BE REALLY PISSED.
THAT SAID IF YOU WERE A FAN OF LOLLY OR STUMBLE ON SOME OF HER OLD GLAMOUR STUFF AND WANT TO SEE HER DO HARDCORE PORN THAN THIS IS THE SITE TO GO TO.
|
09-19-17 11:41am
|
Reply
165
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I picked cellphone but that's really a cheat on my part because I don't own a cellphone and I can do anything a cellphone can using other types of technologies. If the choice was between television and internet than it would be easy since you can view almost any TV show from the net but let's say that each platform is exclusive than I would have to give up the internet first because I have lived the bulk of my life without the net but I've been watching TV since I was a child.
That said the one thing that I would give up last is books and magazines because unlike any of the other choices. This one requires only that you have some light and your imagination to work.
|
09-19-17 11:30am
|
Reply
166
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Yosemite's Reply
A very good analogy but I think it's worse that that because at least a dog gets to be taken off the leash but most people are enslaved to their smartphone to the point where they can't go anywhere or do anything without having their phone right beside them. That's why I look at cellphone/smartphone addiction as technology enslavement but where the person self-enslaved him/herself to a piece of technology.
|
09-19-17 11:21am
|
Reply
167
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I enjoy a variety of porn but the kind that I love above anything else is good or if I'm lucky great scenario driven porn. Sadly that doesn't really exist anymore. For that reason I would have a site that is dedicated to shooting long scenario driven movies. I would have script and dialogue writers, professionally trained makeup artist, prop and costumer managers, multiple camera operators, good editors and most importantly a group of performers that can also act the various roles my writers would come up with.
I would have many days of rehearsal set aside to prepare the performers before shooting the various scenes. The sex scenes would be for the most part hardcore and some might even be extreme but they would have to look as fluid as possible and above all else there should be some passion happening between the various performers. In essence I want what mainstream filmmakers can do with a movie but with the added hardcore sex scenes that they can't do.
|
09-19-17 11:11am
|
Reply
168
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'll second RA's comment and add that this is a niche that is not even represented so you could corner the market. You could even be bold and maybe have some of the scenes shot in some sort of outdoor waterfall like shower or in pools.
If you think about it. You can't be the only person who has thought about what you described so if it's something you would like to see than it's almost guaranteed that it's also something that others would like to see. On a purely business point of view. Shooting that type of content would be extremely cheap because there is no sex involved. As a bonus. You could probably get more than just gay performers to appear on the site because there is no sex involved.
|
09-19-17 10:47am
|
Reply
169
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I think that inter-office dating is fine in most cases because this has the potential to become a committed relationship but a hooking up is a major no-no because it's literally the opposite and can only lead to serious issues the day after.
That said anyone considering dating a co-worker would have to make sure that neither one is a subordinate of the other, neither one works in the same department at the same time(shift-work would be okay and last but not least. Both parties have to realise that if the relationship sours and breaks up that working environment may be so bad that one or both may have to leave or worse get fired.
|
09-15-17 06:52pm
|
Reply
170
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
This one is tricky because if you are someone like me with years of surfing for porn then you are less likely to fall for a site's claims without being able to actually verify those claims. That's why when a site's main page promises great content but then don't actually show you anything then I assume that they don't have anything worth showing and move on. So for me the lack of an informative tour page is as useful as if they had multiple pages worth of info because I know exactly what I'm getting with both types of tour pages.
|
09-12-17 11:40am
|
Reply
171
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
No...No... and No.
|
09-12-17 11:22am
|
Reply
172
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
I agree that watching porn isn't cheating per say because ultimately there is no relationship between the viewer and the performers but it's a very different thing if you are interacting with a cam model or in a private booth with a stripper because there is now an actual back and forth discussion between you and those women. I'm willing to bet that you return to those same cam models and strippers on a pretty regular basis which to me means that your relationship is even deeper than you may realise.
You don't necessarily have to have sex with another woman for it to be cheating because if you interact on a personal basis with a woman that isn't your wife, girlfriend or analyst than you are going down a very slippery road that could lead to an accident.
|
09-08-17 07:52am
|
Reply
173
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not sure but exactly how would you get access to that persons computer. I could understand if this was in regards to a library computer or some kind of internet café but in both of those cases I have a strong feeling that they will have some pretty limiting filters to prevent people from surfing for porn and even if they wouldn't then why would you want to surf for porn in those venues?
|
09-05-17 08:28am
|
Reply
174
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Although billing and bandwidth are two things that could be an issue. They rarely are for me because I only join sites who used certain CC Processor and I've only got burned once due to slow bandwidth.
My biggest fear with most networks is terrible navigation because by their very nature these networks have huge libraries of content and if it's difficult or complicated to find that content then ultimately I will be very disappointed with my membership.
|
09-05-17 08:25am
|
Reply
175
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Usually it's the model featured on thumbnail that is at the core of why I might be interested.
|
08-26-17 09:42am
|
