| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1776
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
Great review. I love the idea of lesbian strapon sex so a site like this is what I look for but this one is not really good. There is not a lot of content to begin with and the price is very high but I could overlook these things if what was available inside was in line to what I like. The models are all attractive and they are all well filmed but there is very little chemistry between the girls and too many of them can't properlly use a strapon and that's not very good in a site where strapon sex is the number one thing.
The fake cum does nothing for me but I can overlook it but I don't know if everyone else could.
|
06-07-12 06:59am
|
Reply
1777
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I don't think I've ever skipped voting and psoting a comment on more then 2 or 3 polls. The ones i skipped were because the subject had absolutely nothing to do with me.
I like it when one of the poll questions moves to the forum and we get to debate it a little more.
|
06-07-12 06:45am
|
Reply
1778
|
Meat Members
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
I also heard about him selling the site but I think it was many years ago and that was after the network was already no longer updating with new content.
I used to keep track of their updates because it was one of those sites that was borderline in my book. I liked their choice of girls but the content frightened me a little because I was never sure that there would be enough stuff that I like vs stuff that is too mysoginistic
|
06-05-12 09:58am
|
Reply
1779
|
Meat Members
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
The main person responsible for the bulk of their content was a guy called Khan Tusion and the rumor is that he wasn't all that nice to the girls and that he may have had a hard time getting them to work for him as word got out about him.
I think some of the sites kept on adding new content after most had stopped but unless I'm very wrong then there really hasn't been anything new added in over 2 years.
|
06-05-12 09:10am
|
Reply
1780
|
Meat Members
(0)
|
Reply of
Stukowitz's Review
I could be wrong but I believe the sites has been dead for quite a long time in regards to new content so all the scenes are 2 or more years old.
|
06-04-12 06:41pm
|
Reply
1781
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I prefer if the hair color is a natural one and not one of those weird shades. Other than that then it really depends on the model herself. Some girls can chnage their color and it somehow suits them while others should avoid some colors.
The only excpetion are red heads. I don't like it when they play with their hair color because I think red heads are the most beautiful women in the world.
|
06-03-12 10:47am
|
Reply
1782
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
This is really important when you dare to give a site the coveted 100% score. Many of the statements are in regards to the reviewers feelings and not cold hard facts.
I'll pass on this one unless I see a lot more info.
|
06-03-12 10:43am
|
Reply
1783
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
I won't comment on the 100 score because you seem to be a huge fan and that tends to affect our perception of things to the point where we lose objectivity. What I will say is that I would never join her site based on the info you have put into this review because there is frankly very little actual data about the content.
How many videos does she have?
What's the resolution?
Are the pics only stills taken from her videos?
Are they all shot in POV style?
Does she shoot with anyone other than her husband?
How many live shows does she do in a month?
Is the bulk of the content softcore to midcore?
The site is 30$ and based on a quick visit then the content mostly looks like some softcore to midcore style content with solo stuff being pretty high on the list of things. When you couple that with the bulk if not all of the videos shot using a handcam or tripod and that already doesn't endear it to me.
|
06-02-12 06:48pm
|
Reply
1784
|
MILF Mania XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Reply
A weakness on some of TBP's reviews is that they'll take a site's word when they claim exclusivity of their content. I forgive them this little oversight because I'm an old old pro when it comes to review sites and there truly is no other sites remotely close to TBP and now PU.
I only checked a couple of the videos myself and I know they are on some of the streaming sites but I don't know if they are also on sites like Videobox or VideosZ. The ones I looked at weren't but that doesn't mean that some or many aren't. If the site was a little less expensive or there was a lot more content then it might not be that bad but there doesn't seem to be more than a 130 or so videos and 20$ for non-exclusif content is high. Especially when some of it isn't all that new.
|
06-01-12 06:25pm
|
Reply
1785
|
MILF Mania XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
Although I am certain that many of these videos are available on other sites. How many of them are available on download sites? If the bulk of the videos are only available on streaming only sites then they are in the right to say exclusif since they offer their customer he ability to download the scene.
You did make some excellent point and I do think it's important to submit an error report since the review is quite new.
|
06-01-12 11:56am
|
Reply
1786
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I love small breast so A cups is my first choice but anything up to C is more than fine. I can't say that I dislike D cups per say but I find that very few woman with them appeal to me.
|
06-01-12 06:03am
|
Reply
1787
|
The Squirt Instructor
(0)
|
Reply of
chiselman's Reply
Make sure you submit an error report with the info about this being a full membership. This way TBP can make the appropriate inquiry with the site and fix it so that others don't get burned.
|
05-30-12 06:14pm
|
Reply
1788
|
The Squirt Instructor
(0)
|
Reply of
chiselman's Review
please submit an error report on TBP because they reviewed the site last month so this must be a very recent change. Let them know if you chose the trial membership or if you picked the full one.
|
05-30-12 11:57am
|
Reply
1789
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I picked the fantasy aspect because it seems to be the one that fits the most.
|
05-30-12 08:58am
|
Reply
1790
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Whoever is inside the suit must be in great health because the heat inside those suits gets high in a short amount of time. I think they created the site for the plushie market because that's the only people who will be able to enjoy the scene without laughing. The premise is kind of dumb and the finger pointing and grunting make it a joke. I agree with you that there is a Benny Hill/Monthy Python feel to the scenes. I could have seen those guys doing this but without the hardcore sex part.
Luckily most of the other sites are much better.
|
05-30-12 08:57am
|
Review
1791
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+You get access to a total of 9 sites.
+All videos can be downloaded in WMV, MP4 and they offer versions for smartphone and Ipads.
+All videos come in multiple resolution but 720P at 50fps is the highest possible.
+You can stream the videos in a flash player.
+All photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file. Resolution is 1600x1067.
+They have a good selection of well known Eastern European models in their late teens early 20`s.
+Content is in a fetish category not well represented so that can be a major plus for fans.
+You get a special priceof 19.99$ through TBP/PU |
| Cons: |
-The premise may seem a creepy to some.
-A giant man in a panda suit doesn`t make for great sex scenes.
-The name given to the performers is rarely the one they are normally known under.
-There are only 26 scenes to choose from and they update about twice a month. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This would be a pretty awful stand alone site because I don't know if the content can really appeal to more than plushie fans. You have a man dressed as a giant panda who entices a young woman normally dressed as a young girl or semi-pretends to be a young girl into having sex with him. The sex often involves a dildo of varying size and color. I know that some may find the content slightly creepy but I mostly found it stupid. I might have had a different view if the man in the suit didn't grunt like a bear through most of the scene. I laughed the first time I heard him and didn't stop laughing since the grunting is through most of the video. It makes it hard to get turned on while you are laughing.
*Another huge problem is that since the guy is wearing a full panda suit then he can't see much, can't feel anything, and can't properly use the strap on either because of these two limtations. The girl is normally the one doing most of the work. What you wind up with is a little scenario with very little dialogue except for the grunting, a lot of finger pointing, not very good sex, and limited shots of the action because the suit is often in the way.
*I honestly don't know if this type of content can appeal to anyone other than flushie fans so if you aren't one of these than you'll probably want to staw away.
**Normally I would give a bigger score simply because you get access to much better sites but since most of the girls on this site have scenes on the other sutes than I'm treating this one more as a stand alone.** |
|
05-29-12 11:14am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1792
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use IE so whichever one is included with it is the one that I use. I have the same issue that Toadsith has so it's really a part time ad-blocker
|
05-28-12 06:10am
|
Reply
1793
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I wish I could tell you that you will like the quality but I can't be certain because I'm really not that picky myself. 640x480 is more than an acceptable resolution for me.
|
05-27-12 05:47pm
|
Reply
1794
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
Thanks but this really should be in a review and not a comment. Comments are to be used for a couple of lines or info that may not be in a review or to advise us that there have been changes done to the site. The amount of work you put into this is really impressive and will sadly be lost since comments get added on a regular basis and I know that I only look at them form time to time but I always look for a review before joining a site.
|
05-27-12 11:43am
|
Reply
1795
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
If anyone has read my previous post than you know that I really don't like facials so bukkake is an even bigger no. I would say that I hate them but that may be too hard. I do know that I skip any facials and I've never actually watched a bukkake for more than one second.
I find the entire idea of facials and bukkake to be offensive in the same way that I find spitting in the girls face to be offensive.
|
05-26-12 07:43pm
|
Reply
1796
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
It's hard to tell if you would like the bulk of their content. If you aren't dead set on HD then you might go ahead but you should definetely avoid if you need HD. There is simply not enough HD on the entire network to warrant the join price.
|
05-22-12 10:20am
|
Review
1797
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+A network of 28 sites.
+You can access all the sites from the main page.
+They update with about 12 new scenes per month which are broken among their 6 active sites.
+Over 2600 scenes to choose from.
+The vast majority of the scenes have an both a video and photoset.
+Videos are in WMV and most of them are in a single WMV file.
+All photosets can be downloaded in a single zip file. Resolution is 1200x800 for most of these.
+All content is dated and they show upcoming updates. |
| Cons: |
-21 of the sites are no longer updating and the other six don't update on a weekly basis.
-It is hard to tell how much of the content is leased but there appears to be a significant amount that is.
-Most of the videos are not in HD and full downloads are only available in WMV.
-A percentage of the older videos are split in multiple video files.
-Many of the sites content could be under one banner since the content is the same as other sites.
-Scenes have no tags so no way of doing a search using tag words.
-There is no real search system since you can only look under the performer's name or the site itself.
-Most of the performers are not known under the name they are given on this network. |
| Bottom Line: |
This network has a lot of content and I don't know if it matters that a percentage of it is leased because it's stuff you might not have anyway. The bigger issue is that a lot of this content is getting old because 2 of the sites stopped updating in 2010-2011, 4 sites stopped in 2009 and 15 stopped in 2007-2008. That only leaves 7 sites still active and these update with only 2-3 scenes per month.
*I have posted a review of almost all of their active sites and these are only about a year old. I know that others have reviewed some of their sites so I'm instead posting info on some of the other sites that aren't active anymore or those that don't have or deserve a full review.
**They've added a new anal themed site called young anal tryouts but it only has 34 scenes and a percentage of these are leased. That wouldn't be so bad but some of the exclusif scenes are shot using a tripod so you get shots from the same angle and no zooming or paning during the scene. The girls are really cute but I would never join this network for their scenes because you can either get them elsewhere or they suck.
**You will notice that TBP doesn't post one of their sites called horny thief tales. I don't know why but I can guess so I will simply say that they have 46 scenes, it's exclusif content and they are still updating with about 2 scenes per month. I've never actually downloaded any of their scenes so couldn't do an honest review anyway
**young porn home videos is a site where I know that some of the content is leased because I recognize the scene. They have 84 scenes and the quality in most of them is bad to awfull. Most of the videos have an amateur feel to them with tripod only shots, night-vision cameras, bad lighting, fuzzy shots and so on.
**young lesbian porn appears to be all leased content with 69 scenes to choose from. The scenes are next to impossible to review because the content is too ecletic, quality varies a lot and only 15 of the scenes have an accompanying video.
**drilled mouths is appears to be an oral sex themed site with 46 scenes but where a large percentage of the girls also have sex with the guy so why call the sites makes no sense. Content appear to be partiallt leased and qulaity varies from scene to scene.
**creampied sweeties is exactly what it sounds like. They have 40 scenes, some of them are probably leased and quality varies.
**They have many other sites that could probably have been under one of two different site names but the recuring theme among all of them is that they are no longer updating, a lot of leased material, quality of the content varies a lot and most of the sites have very little content.
***I don't know if anyone should join the network for any of these sites because you might already have the content and even if you don't then you might not want it anyway. You should join the network for the active sites and use these as a bonus instead.***
My score is for the entire network and not based on these sites. |
|
05-22-12 08:30am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1798
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I don't follow anyone on Twitter or any other social media. I have from time to time read a few tweets from different performers but it's usually when someone asks a question and they reference something the performer wrote on Twitter.
|
05-22-12 06:23am
|
Reply
1799
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
I'm not a computer guy so I can't tell you the cost but don't forget that these guys own a few more sites with the same design so it would require them to make the chan4ages on all of their sites and that's likely to make it a lot more expensive.
|
05-22-12 06:20am
|
Reply
1800
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I've made a couple of mistakes lately in joining sites based solely on a couple of models and that was a mistake because I can't say that I really liked their content and sadly didn't much like the rest of the content either. The back tattoo would be a turn off for me so as much as a girl might be amazing from the front. I would know that she has the back tattoo and even if i could overlook it then sooner or later they would shoot her from an angle where it's impossible to miss and I'd be right back at square one.
I tried FTV once but their type of porn does little for me because it's mostly all solo stuff and frankly it's almost all midcore style porn.
|
05-20-12 12:28pm
|
