| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1901
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I picked other but any of the first 3 are the main reasons why I visit and participate at PU.
|
03-21-12 11:00am
|
Reply
1902
|
Tiny Becky
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks and I'm crossing my fingers that you find some of the sites decent.
|
03-21-12 10:58am
|
Reply
1903
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
pornuserfb's Comment
You should definetely do a review rather than post a comment. This way we would have the review to look at and you could put a lot more data. The last review goes back to 2008.
|
03-20-12 06:07pm
|
Reply
1904
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
The first thing is the preview section because new sites usually don't have any reviews so unless I can see what's available inside then I won't bother joining for any amount. The second most important thing is the quantity of videos and/or pics. The price is rarely an issue for me because
if I find the price too high then it won`t really matter the quantity of quality of the content because I won`t want to pay this.
|
03-20-12 06:52am
|
Reply
1905
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I hope you enjoy them and I look forward to reading your review.
|
03-19-12 06:09pm
|
Reply
1906
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I can't say that I noticed too many problems in regards to zooming but the crappy angles and shaking is all there to be disliked by people like me. Mofo's let's try anal does a kind of similar types of videos and yet the guy at Mofo still manages to do a better job than this one. It's still POV and still crappy but there are levels of crappiness.
|
03-18-12 05:39pm
|
Reply
1907
|
Watch Me Fucked
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I give networks like teen mega world a lot of leeway when it comes to updates and such because they are only 20$ and you get more than your money's worth at the end of each month. That's why it doesn't bother me too much that the bulk of their sites only update a few times each week or month while others stopped updating years ago. This particular site is one of those that didn't really need to exist unless they mean to remove some sites by incorporating their content under other sites whitnin the network.
|
03-18-12 05:35pm
|
Reply
1908
|
Tiny Becky
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
If you decide to take a bullet then please let me know if it's half decent. There are some really cute models in the network so I could live with just a few videos from most of them and videos in 640x360 resolution is fine by me.
|
03-18-12 05:29pm
|
Reply
1909
|
Tiny Becky
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I've never been a member but I certainly been tempted. I have never seen one positive review of any of the other sites in the network so I'm affraid of wasting 30$ on stuff that may not appeal. It's seems pretty clear that the bulk of the sites are dead and the content is at least a couple of years old. That's not necessarily a bad thing but the best resolutrion I saw for the videos is 640x360 so that might not appeal to many.
|
03-18-12 09:44am
|
Reply
1910
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think I'll be signing a lot less simply because I'm finding less stuff that I like and the sites that I keep track of are updating less often with stuff that I want. The recession has seriously hurt the porn industry and all those torrents sites didn't help.
|
03-18-12 09:13am
|
Reply
1911
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I know of a couple of these girls went further in their porn career so it's kind of interesting to see them in their beginning. The thing that kills it for me is the POV. I prefer when the porn is shot by someone other than the performer himself.
|
03-18-12 09:08am
|
Reply
1912
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The only way to see the backroom casting couch offer is on the sites join page. I checked my past charges and that's why I know that it used to be 25$ for jus this site. of course it would be better if they offered the two options so that you can get just this site for 25$ and 35$ if you want both.
|
03-18-12 09:06am
|
Reply
1913
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
It used to be that you had to join both sites seperately if you wanted to get access to both but they increased the price on ECG by about 10$ and gave their members access to both sites. If you enjoy the content on both sites then it's a great deal because it's 35$ instead of the 50$ you'd have spent a couple of years ago. I don't know if it's a temporary thing but the deal has been there fr a few months already.
I'll answer your other questions at the same time and say that there are no pics on any of the sites. All the videos on BCC are shot by himself so the best you could get would be screen grabs from the video camera but the quality would be awful and the reason is the same as for why you will never see HD content. The cameras he uses look like models you can buy at Best Buy so I don't think they are professional models needed for quality pic grabs. It's about the same thing on ECG but I think the guy could still take a few pics because the content is a little different. Mind you ECG uses the same type of cameras so quality is not likely to be any better.
|
03-16-12 09:50am
|
Reply
1914
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Hi Cybertoad. Take a look at the review because you'll notice that it has completely changed since I screwed up my review. I used the info for backroom casting couch for exploited college girl. I have corrected my error and made a review for the other site. You will see that exploited gets a better score and review than it's sister site.
|
03-16-12 06:14am
|
Review
1915
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Content is all exclusif.
+there are more than 190 scenes.
+The vast majority of the girls are amateurs and this is one of the few places you'll see them do hardcore.
+They have a wide variety of teen models. |
| Cons: |
-They don't seem to updating very often but I can't say how often they do because they don't put dates on their content.
-The videos can only be downloaded in WMV and resolution is a rather poor 640x360.
-All the videos are shot in POV and the guy doesn't really know how use a camera.
-The interview part of the video is a complete waste of time and pure BS.
-All the scenes are shot in the same office and on the same couch and desk.
-There is no editing so a good chunk of the video is the guy moving the camera or tripod around the room.
-The sex is mediocre at best.
-Still no pics of any kind. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I only joined this site because I got a deal when I joined exploited college girls because you also get this one. This is my second time on this site and it will also be my final time.
*The premise for the site is very interesting and someone with talent should be able to make a killing but the guy responsible for this mess either doesn't have any talent or simply doesn't care about the final product. You would think that someone who's been doing this for as long as he has would get better with time but I did not see a difference between the newer videos and the older stuff.
*All the flaws that were there in 2010 are still there. You have the stupid interview where it's hard to believe the BS being said. You have his hiden face whenever it's in the shot. The videos are all POV and tripod shot so that's already a negative. There are many bad camera angles, weird cut in the action, bad camera position during the action so that the shots are wasted, he likes to talk during the video.
*Shooting in an office environment with a chair, desk and the typical casting couch is such a bad idea because the room is small, the performer is never really made comfortable and this nis especially true during the sex because she will either be on her back on the hard desk(no padding of any kind), bent forward over the desk or having sex on the sofa which happens to be a few feet in front of the sofa whcih means that you can't really use the tripoid appropriately during what should be the most comfortable part of the video for the girl.
**It's hard to recommend this mess to anyone but anyone who wants to see amateurs have sex and don't really mind if the sex is badly shot, not very intense, where the male is not a good sex performer and where each video looks like the previous one might get something out of it. Everyone else should stay far away.** |
|
03-16-12 06:11am
Replies (11)
|
Review
1916
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
03-15-12 07:07pm (Update History)
Reason: I completely screwed up my reviews because this is for backroom casting couch. and not exploited college girl
|
| Pros: |
+The content is all exclusif.
+The majority of the models are amateurs and this is one of the only places where you'll see them do porn. (although a few of them have had porn careers after this)
+There are some truly good looking models and there is also a good variety.
+They update with one new video a week.
+All updates are dated.
+Videos can be downloaded a sa complete file or you can download certain sections. |
| Cons: |
-The shooting style is very similar to backroom casting couch so it's all handheld POV, on a tripod or on the bed.
-Because the performer doesn't want his face to be seen then all the shots either avoid shooting above a certain height or his face his hidden.
-Videos can be dowloaded in MP4 or WMV but resolution is still only 640x360.
-The girls attempting anal tend to all be trying this for the first time so it's more often than not a fail or hard to watch because of pain. |
| Bottom Line: |
*I chose to join this site because you got access to backroom casting couch(see my next review). It's my second time here and it will be my last. The content still has potential but it can't overhsadow the unapealing ponr inside.
*The site is similar to backroom casting couch and girls do porn. It is superior to BCC but it is inferior to girl do porn. The problem is that the guy has to be in the videos so he has to be both cameraman and performer. I can see the appeal for any guy to want to have sex with these girls but that also means you mostly get handheld POV shots with less than steallar angles and that's when the camera isn't moving from left to right or being dep[osited on the bed to get a face shot.
*The one positive about this site vs back room casting couch is that the guy appears to want to make the girls happy and comfortable and that helps with the scene but not if anal is in it.
I only saw a couple of the girls appeared to be enjoying themselves during the anal. The bulk of the other videos are hard to watch or listen to because you can see and hear the gilrs in pain.
**If you like POV shot porn and you also like to see amateurs and can overlook the errors in the way the videos are shot then you might enjoy the site but be advised that it's 35$ and that is not a cheap amount to pay. It would be a lot easier to recommedn if it was in the 20$ to 25$ dollar range.** |
|
03-15-12 12:25pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
1917
|
Saffron Taylor
(0)
|
Reply of
Latex Addict's Review
This is your first review and you seem to you really like her but the score you gave the site seems very high for what you wrote and it's significantly higher than what TBP gave the site. Giving such a high score without corroborating data tends to make people believe that your review is just there for marketing purposes.
You might want to take a look at other reviews and see how they are so that you can at least emulate them until you find your own way of doing things.
|
03-15-12 10:23am
|
Reply
1918
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I do the same thing like jberryl69.
|
03-15-12 10:06am
|
Reply
1919
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
The site is honest about content so if you didn't see it anywhere then it's not there. I believe that each site has a certain number of exclusif movies so unless you want to join both site then you have to pick which one has the movies you want.
|
03-14-12 07:32am
|
Reply
1920
|
Natasha Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
There might be someone but I rather doubt it so here is what I think you should do. You should stay far away from this site. That is unless you have 25$ dollars that's buring a hole in your pocket and you really don't know what to do with it and even then I think you could find a lot better things to invest in then this site. This is your typical solo model site with a few clothed, semi-nude or all nude photos and videos and not much else. Now that might just be what you want but I still think you can find better. I'm including a link to a another members review of the other site owned by the same company. You'll see that the site didn't get avery good score and i don't think her's will be any better.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=64579
You could start a thread in the forum on what you are looking for and if you are looking for a model that looks like Natasha then reference her site so that people get an idea of what type of model you like.
|
03-13-12 07:22pm
|
Reply
1921
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I chose mature because this is a niche that seems to be slowly disapearing.
|
03-13-12 12:01pm
|
Reply
1922
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I think that a membership to 21sextury and teen mega world would more than surpasses anything you'd get out of DDF. Which is too bad because I used to be a huge fan of Hands on Hardcore. Mind you that was many years ago. I knew it was over the day that scenes started disapearing from one site and reapearing as new updates on another site.
Ah well it was good while it lasted and may one day get good again.
|
03-11-12 06:33pm
|
Reply
1923
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
DDF lost me as a possible member a long time ago. I visit maybe once a month to see if they have added anything that might interest me and I haven't seen anything that I can't get elsewhere for a lot less. Their glory days are far behind them now. If they go the route of the 54$ then I feel pretty comfortable in saying that it won't be long until they go out of business. The economy is still in major trouble and people can't afford to spend 3 times the amount on this network that they spend elsewhere.
New customers are great for sites but repeat business is where you make your money. A newbie joining for the first time should get his money's worth at 54$ but how many returning members will want to pay that price?
|
03-11-12 09:22am
|
Reply
1924
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I'm with Cybertoad on this one...HUH???
|
03-11-12 09:13am
|
Reply
1925
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
This stype of stuff is actually quite old because Ed Power or Pierre Woodman was doing this years before this site existed and doing significantly better.
The fact that the girls are all amateurs isn't the problem. It's because the guy responsible for shooting the videos is an idiot. You'd think that a guy who has been doing this type of content for nearly 2 years would have gotten better but he isn't. At least he is not getting worse but that's not necessarily a compliment.
The first big mistake I can see is that they make sure that none of the shots include the face of the male performers. This limits the possible angles you can shoot from to the point where you might as well be doing POV or tripod only videos.
I didn't use the cost of the site in my review because I would still think the videos suck at 20$ but it would be easier to tell someone to give it a try if is wasn't 30$.
|
03-09-12 06:24pm
|
