| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1926
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I don't have any but that could be because I've always stuck with the big ones and/or I have never had one of the stated problems with any of the ones I joined.
|
03-09-12 07:01am
|
Reply
1927
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think that 2 days is fine.
|
03-07-12 08:29am
|
Reply
1928
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I think this is the third person in a week who posted that he got screwed and all of them could have avoided this if they ahd done just a little bit of research before joining their respective site.
|
03-07-12 08:28am
|
Reply
1929
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
Reply of
barnlol's Comment
I can't say this any cleareer except that you must read past reviews before you join a site or you can wind up with some very unpleasant surprises. I suspect you didn't do that because if you had then you would have seen that TBP has stopped doing business with them and that is always a major red flag. Then there was a review done in 2009 that gave the site the lowest possible score.
I know that I get no greater pleasure than warning other people that a site is to be avoided. Doing a review for a good site is fun but making sure that a crappy one goes out of business doesn't compare.
|
03-06-12 06:48pm
|
Reply
1930
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Sadly the videos aren't very well shot and since this is all you get then I say save your money.
|
03-06-12 06:42pm
|
Reply
1931
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I'm not sure but I would suspect that there is more than one reason why they do. I do know that Dana Dearmond defended Nacho on another forum when a few posters started talking about his mysoginistic attitude toward female perfomers. She saying that it's an act and that he's not like that on set and yet in a later thread she bashed him for scene they shot together where she didn't appreciate the way he treated her.
|
03-05-12 10:54am
|
Reply
1932
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I agree with graymane that it's many times rather than a few. That's saying a lot when you consider that I'm a huge fan of hardcore porn.
|
03-05-12 07:25am
|
Reply
1933
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
There are some credible rumours that Timo is in fact a huge jerk so it's no surpsiee that he would be on screen what he is off screen.
I've enjoyed many Rocco Siffredi movies in my life but he sometimes comes off as one hell of a jerk in his movies and don't get me started with Nacho Vidal.
|
03-05-12 07:19am
|
Review
1934
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They currently have 147 videos.
+The majority of the models are unknowns and this is possibly the only video they will shoot.
+All the models are in their late teens to early 20's and most of them are quite beautiful.
+All the videos can be downloaded in WMV and the resolution is 720x480.
+They update with at least one new video a week. |
| Cons: |
-You must remain a member for at leat 2 months before you can stream or download the HD videos and that at the full price. They only offer a reduction in price for members that have been active for more than 3 months.
-The videos are all shot in an hotel room and the lighting is not always adequate.
-The person filming the scenes lacks imagination so the bulk of the videos are all shot in the same way so they all have the same flaws and they all shot using the same caera angles.
-Most of the models are atractive but a good percentage of them have more than one tatoo.
-There are no pics whatosever.
-The content is not dated
-The site's navigation is beyond awful. You can only move by selecting a page on the bottom of the site or clicking on the model which always reverts to the first page of the site.
-The male in the videos is never seen above the chest so that also limts the possible shots. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This is my second vist in less than a year and I think it will be my last. This is sad because the site manages to hire some really attractive young women that are willing to do hardcore porn but the guys shooting the porn is incompetent and all the sites flaws get more annoying with each visit so that it makes the experience less appealing now than when I was last a member.
*A very annoying thing is that the bulk of the videos aren't identified so you have to do some research before downloading them so that you can at least put the model's name on the file. Then there's the awfull navigation system that does not allow you to go back to where you were once you click on a particular page since the system always returns to the first page regardless of where you were on the site.
*You would think that a video that's not shot in POV or with a tripod would manage not to look as though it was but you'd be wrong because this is exactly how most of the videos look like on this site. The guy shooting the videos manages to always use the same angles and positions in the videos so that they actually look like they are shot in a POV style or filmed using a tripod.
*I can understand a site wanting to reward their long term members by offering HD videos to those that stick with the site for more than one month but if you're going to do that then make sure the second month is half the price. Otherwise it makes the site one of the most expensive one on the net when it comes to HD content.*
**If you want to see some unknown attractive young women have hardcore sex and don't care too much about the camera angles and the lighting then you should be very happy with this site. If camera angles, lighting and variety in shots is important than stay away.** |
|
03-04-12 06:41pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1935
|
Adult DVD Empire
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Review
I'm sorry but you'll have to put a lot more data than your anecdotal stories about the quality of their customer service to justify what I consider to be a very very high score. This is basically your run of the mill online dvd store who also happens to offer VOD and in mail services. their prices aren't even all that great.
|
03-04-12 06:05pm
|
Reply
1936
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I guess this makes me a kind of hypocrite but I'd be more likely to discourage a girl from getting into porn than helping her. It's no big secret that I like porn and it's a quick way to make some pretty large sums of money for what amounts to a few hours of work but the industry eats and spits out girls at an alarming rate. The number of girls that truly undertand everything that doing porn entails is insignificant comapred to those that think there's nothing to it.
|
03-03-12 09:44am
|
Reply
1937
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
I don't think you'll get lucky with PU because the last review was almsot 3 years ago while TBP's was last year. The reviewer gave a C rating to the navigation so I don't think it's much better than when you were a member.
|
03-02-12 06:48am
|
Reply
1938
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
marve75's Comment
I just want to add that if it was written somewhere on the site that a large part of the content is streaming only then Score would have a leg to stand on their policy but since they don't then all they are doing is stealing members money by promising to offer something and then not coming through.
|
03-01-12 06:23pm
|
Reply
1939
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As long as the sites is 30$ or less then I don't think the cost should be an issue. The reason why I say that is that I've joined sites that were 25$ and I only downloaded a couple of videos while I joined sites there 30$ and I downloaded a ton of content.
I've only used the price as a factor a couple of times. I know I gave the Ferro network a much lower score because I found the content in no way justified the huge cost of membership.
|
03-01-12 09:54am
|
Reply
1940
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
marve75's Comment
I wish you had read what I and some others have written about some of the Score group sites because you would have known that Score has decided to stop allowing their paying mebers the possibility of downloading videos. I got burned when I joined 40 something mag last year and I've been telling anyone that will listen that you should stay far away from any Scote group site.
Sorry for your recent problem. My suggestion for any future site is is that you should read TBP and PU reviews of the site and I also look at other reviews of the sites owned by the same webmaster so that I can get a feel for the parent company. You should also read comments because you'll often see these little bits of info not necessarily found on older reviews.
|
02-29-12 09:38am
|
Reply
1941
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
This site is new so it wasn't included in my past membership so I'll let you know once I again join the network. The site doesn'ty interest be but there are 3 others in the network that do.
|
02-29-12 07:39am
|
Reply
1942
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Panda Fuck doesn't even make it to my top 10 list. The reason why I really don't have an issue with the site is that the performers may be teens/young women but they aren't made to look like pre-teen girls. I might have a different view if they dressed the performers too look like very young girls. I think Gazette Risque said it best when he mentioned that there is a fringe group that really likes it's flurry style porn. It's kind of like cosplay but with giant mascots.
|
02-28-12 06:33pm
|
Reply
1943
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
You should look at TBP's review since it was done last Septemeber so the data should be pretty up to date.
|
02-28-12 11:39am
|
Reply
1944
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
The majority of US performers get to choose the name a site must use. There are exceptions but I find that it's normally with girls doing their first appearance in porn. We know That's not the same thing with Eastern European models because they almost always have multiple names.
|
02-28-12 11:11am
|
Reply
1945
|
Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
Let me rephrase my statement and say that the studio producing the content is dying and not the internet site. Of course at some point the site will die if they can't get new content but I know that ZT is still making movies but the number of actual new titles is very small. These days they tend to sell repackaged older videos.
|
02-28-12 11:05am
|
Reply
1946
|
Watch Me Fucked
(0)
|
Reply of
Stas RC's Reply
My pleasure. Do you know if you are going to be transfering POV videos from the other sites onto this one and updating with new videos as well?
|
02-28-12 07:09am
|
Reply
1947
|
Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I think the days of ZT releasing great movies on a regular basis are over. The studio is now on my list of dying studios so unless there are major changes in their business then you'll see less and less updates since they release less and less movies.
|
02-27-12 06:08pm
|
Review
1948
|
Watch Me Fucked
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+They have an excellent selection of models.
+You get access to 30 extra sites.
+You can download the videos in multiple formats like MP4, FLV, MKV and WMV.
+Video resolution is offered in low, medium and high quality (medium resolution is 860x480).
+You can download photosets as a complete zip file and pic resolution is 960x1440. |
| Cons: |
-A part of their content is recycled videos from some of their other sites.
-The bulk of the performers on this site already have very similar scenes on the other sites.
-There are only 19 videos at the moment.
-They opened the site in November and they were doing an update every few days and then they stopped updating from early December until early February. |
| Bottom Line: |
*This may be a very good addition to the teen mega world network one day but the owners have to stop using scenes from their other sites as new updates. I can understand if they created this site to regroup all their POV style videos under one banner but they have to be careful and update with a mixture of new scenes as well as recyled scenes and they certainly can't skip updating a brand new site for 2 months.
**Since the site is still quite small and that some of the content isn't really new then I'd recommend that anyone looking to join because of their videos wait a few months. Anyone looking for this type of porn but more the content from the main network will get more than his moneys worth.**
**I gave them a smaller score than I would have if I was including the the content from the entire network**. |
|
02-27-12 11:34am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1949
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pantsmulligan's Comment
Be advised that I believe all the Score groups sites have limits on their downloads and it's not clear which videos are streaming only and which ones can be downloaded.
|
02-27-12 07:15am
|
Reply
1950
|
Black Ice Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Comment
As far as I know. The studio is dead an has been for many months. They are part of those studios that didn't survive the bad economy.
|
02-26-12 10:15am
|
