| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2301
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Mina has 2 scenes at BoB. She did one in June 2010 which was a
one-on-one and in July 2010 she did a three-on-one. The first ends with cum swallowing and the other in a multiple cum shot to the face. No anal in either case. She also has a gloryhole scene so she actually has 3 scenes available for streaming or download.
**I suspect that the 199$ offer is for a year membership. I seem to remember getting something from them a while back with a similar offer. I don't do year membership so I simply deleted the email.**
|
07-14-11 11:32am
|
Reply
2302
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Hi eelephant.
I'm a current member so I can tell you about the scene if you give me the models name. I'm not sure where you saw the trial membership because I just checked their site and I didn't see that option. They have that 19.99$ per month but that's for a 3 month membership.
|
07-14-11 07:19am
|
Review
2303
|
Shy Angela
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Angela is such an amazingly cute teen model.
-This is probably the only place where you can find her on the net. At least I certainly have never seen her anywhere else.
-She may look young and innocent but she has no problem with having some pretty intense sex with boys. (she has only two lez scene at the moment)
-The site offers some really impressive options for video download: WMV 640x360 (2000 kbps), WMV 1280x720(6000kbps), FLV 640x360 (1300 kbps), FLV 640x360(2500kbps), iphone3G 640x360(1500kbps), ipod 320x180 (512kbps) and H.264 1280x720 (8000 kbps).
-You can download the phototsets as complete zip files. Resolution is 1600x1067.
-You can view photosets online and they offer them in 4 resolutions: 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768
and the standard 1600x1067. The majority of the photosets have over 120 pics per set and some have over 200. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest problem with the site is that it`s tiny with only 23 videos and 24 photosets.
-Another problem is that 14 of the scenes are solo in nature and mostly midcore.
-Updates are also a problem because they don`t have a set date and they don`t come very often. TBP says the site was launched in October 2010 and they had 9 videos and photosets at that time. that means only 15 updates since October of 2010.
-Normally I don`t use price as a con but 29.95$ is way too expensive for what is available at the moment. It`s hard to tell if and when it might be worth it because their update schedule is uncertain. 15 updates in 9 months is not a good track record.
-They have a bonus section where you can view or download scenes from many dvd's but it's all leased content that can be found elsewhere. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Shy Angela was an impulse join for me. I saw her site`s banner on another site and I just hasd to join. I had high hope that it would be better than what I finally got but that`s what happens when you choose a site based on impulse.
-I think the site has potential even as a stand alone but it will require a significantly larger amount of content before it gets there. I know there is more to be released because there is a B/B/G picture on the preview page and that's not part of the current updates.
-If you think she's too beautiful to past up and don't mind paying 30$ to see her now then go ahead. Otherwise I would recommend waiting at least until the end of this year or beginning of next year to join. hopefully by then she will have more content. |
|
07-14-11 07:15am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
2304
|
Let's Play Lez
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
So do I but here's are some examples that add to my fear. The new anal queen Alyssa was added recently and we haven't seen any updates to the site let's play lez. Both sites have identical content. The only difference between them is that Alyssa is in more content on her site but she's not in all the updates. They have 3 sites that center on lesbian sex. lez cuties, let's play lez and anal queen
Alyssa but the content is somewhat simialr on all of them except that lez cuties is a little less intense and normally centers on only teen models.
They have 4 sites that are centered on one model. Aletta Ocean, Blue Angel, Sophie Moon and Kathia Nobili. I'm not including Club Sandy because Sandy hasn't been the main attraction to that site in years. I'm also not adding Alyssa because her site is still too new and I'll need to see a little more from them before I judge it as a viable addition. Of the 4 I named. Only Aletta is still updating regularly with new content. Blue Angel's last update is in march, Kathia has 3 updates since january and most of Sophie's updates are usually backsatage stuff for shoots that will apear on the other 21sextury sites. You have 5 filler sites that have old content and most of it is leased material.
Now it's not all bad because there are still six sites that update regularly and these are all amazing sites. I would much prefer they drop the filler crap that isn't worth looking at and work on the sites that do.
|
07-14-11 05:49am
|
Reply
2305
|
Let's Play Lez
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
There is an upcoming gapeland update that is with a super cute girl and that's good news but for some strange reason I get the feeling that things aren't all that rosy at 21Sextury. The recession is still going very strong and that means less and less people who have availble porn funds.
|
07-13-11 07:28pm
|
Reply
2306
|
Let's Play Lez
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
I don't know if you've noticed but the site has already stopped posting new updates. Their last one was on June 15. That's a major drop when you consider that they use to post at least 2 uopdates per month.
|
07-13-11 10:35am
|
Reply
2307
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I simply can't watch pixelation porn. The strange part is that the Japanese film some of the most intense type of porn possible and yet they use pixels to hide the penetration parts.
|
07-13-11 06:54am
|
Reply
2308
|
Claudia Marie
(0)
|
Reply of
robbie's Reply
Hi Robbie.
I have amended my review to show that the lower resolution is only on the downloaded videos. I appreciate what you are saying about the streaming content is at a higher resolution but couldn't give a rats ass since I don't join sites to enjoy streaming content. Like most other reviewers on this site. I join sites to download their content which I can enjoy at a later date. I can assure you that if your site had been a streaming only site then my score would have been significantly lower and I would never have recommended it.
|
07-11-11 09:18pm
|
Review
2309
|
Claudia Marie
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Claudia Marie is a super hot 37 yrs old woman with huge breast who loves to have hardcore sex on film.
-All the content is exclusif and most of the videos have a little scenario.
-There are currently 135 videos which can be downloaded or viewd online. The average run time is 20 minutes and more.
-You get access to 17 other sites.
-All content is dated.
-They are still updating with more videos.
-They have a nice interface for searching different types of fetish or sex act.
- |
| Cons: |
-The biggest con has to be Claudia-marie because if you don't like her looks than you certainly won't enjoy any of the videos. She's an above 30 years old woman with huge (now fake) breast who's a little on the chubby side.
-Resolution for downloaded videos is only 368x272.
-The sites offers high resolution photos which are usually 1024x768 or 1152x768 but you can't download them as a single zip file. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Claudia Marie is not the type of model that I'm normally attracted to. I'm not a fan of huge breast whether real or fake but Claudia-marie is such an amazing sex performer that I overlooked that aspect and found myself enjoying her videos.
-Her looks is about the only thing that might be an issue for some people. It's for sure that if you prefer younger models with petite figures than you'll never enjoy the site.
-If you like Claudia-marie's looks and enjoy seeing a woman that craves IR, anal and the more intense B/G sex than you'll really enkjoy this site. Anyone interested in teen sites should stay away.
-The only key improvement would be if they could remaster their videos into a higher resolution.
**Please join site through Celeste Fox since her join price is only 24.96$ instead of 29.99$ for Claudia-Marie's site.** |
|
07-11-11 12:47pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2310
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Without a doubt. I still buy dvd's from time to time and the average price is about 20$ to 25$.
For that price you get maybe 4 to 5 scenes unless it's a comp. You can get hundreds of scene for a similar amount.
|
07-11-11 06:41am
|
Comment
2311
|
Barbi's Slutty Adventures
(0)
|
|
07-10-11 11:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2312
|
Sindy Fox
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-All exclusif content.
-You get access to 17 other sites.
-They have a very good navigation system that allows users to search for a scene by looking under different categories like BJ, anal, group sex and so on.
-Content is all dated.
-They are still updating. |
| Cons: |
-The site has only 18 videos and the longest one is just over 11 minutes long.
-There are only 26 photosets and to make things worse. You can't even download them as a complete zip file.
-The site appears to still be updating but there are no set date and updates don't some often. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is the kind of site that can only survive because it's included in a network and adds to the overall amount of content you get with one membership. There is technically no content on this site since there are almost no videos and since they average about 6 minutes a piece than why bother. Add the fact that you can't even download the photsets as a complete zip file and you have a real crappy site on your hand.
-I can't recommend this site as a stand alone one but there are many other models who have significantly more content on their site and of greater quality than this one.
**My score is based on the network access only** |
|
07-10-11 11:03am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2313
|
Slut Wife Training
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I agree with you since most of the updates is stuff from Porno dan and that may not be exclusif. Mind you there is still a lot of content for a first time member but I see no reason to ever come back.
|
07-10-11 09:35am
|
Review
2314
|
Katie Reynolds
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Katie is a super cute teen model. Her looks remind me a lot of Stoya, Sasha Grey and Sasha rose.
-She has a couple of midcore/hardcore solo vidoes.
-You get access to 25 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-The site is slow to surf. It takes 4-5 seconds for something to happen once you click an icon.
-There are only 50 photosets and to make things worse. You can't even download them as a single zip file.(on a side note TBP's March 2011 review had 59 pic sets)
-There are only 37 videos and most of them are softcore to midcore in nature.(on a side note TBP's March 2011 review had 46 videos).
-None of the content is dated so there's no way of knowing if the site is still updating or what kind of schedule she uses. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Katie has the perfect body for my taste and if she was really seriuous about porn and there was decent content then I'd have a hard staying away. As it is this site is not worth visiting let alone paying to access the measly amount of content.
-My score is based purely on this site as a stand alone since the content on the other sites in the network might not appeal to the people looking at this site.
**The only great thing about this site is that
I got access to the network for 13$ less than if I'd joined through another site. The trick is to visit this site and once you click to leave then a pop up screen appears with the special offer.** |
|
07-09-11 07:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2315
|
Amateur Creampies
(0)
|
Reply of
Shasta90418's Comment
If you really feel passionate about this site then I recommend you do a review. The last one was in 2010 and the score given is not likely to entice too many people to try the site.
|
07-09-11 08:16am
|
Reply
2316
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I picked wmv because that's the one I usually find on most sites. I really like the new h.264 format and that's one I will pick above wmv. The main reason is that the file size is often a little smaller than a wmv file of the same video.
|
07-09-11 08:05am
|
Review
2317
|
Gang Bang Dee
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Dee is a gorgeous red head milf who loves sex in all it's varied form from a simple BJ to a G/G shoot followed by B/G vaginal and then to the more intense anal, DP's and gang bangs.
-It's all exclusif content.
-There are 144 videos which can be viewed online or downloaded.
-All videos can be downloaded as wmv files and they now also offer flash for some videos. The resolution on the wmv is 640x480.
-99% of all the videos come with a derscription of the action.
-You get access to 25 other sites with your membership. |
| Cons: |
The site is slow to surf. I counted 4-5 seconds for something to happen once you click an icon. That's more frustrating than anything else.
-Dee is an older woman and some might consider her a little chubbier than your average porn girl.
-You have 210 photosets but they don't offer the option of downloading as a complete zip file. You'd have to be a pretty patient fan to want to download each pic one at a time.
-The content on some of the other sites is leased and not necessarily of great quality.
-Some of the other sites offered might not appeal to most people
-I can't confirm that the site is till updating with new content except to say that some of the stuff was dated 2010.(on a side note: TBP says that the site was launched in 2010 but there is content going back to 2006) |
| Bottom Line: |
-Dee is an amazing woman with a voracious sexual appetite who seems to really like IR performers and definetly enjoys it when there is more than one person at a time. She really gets off during her shoots because you can clearly see her have orgasms. I'm not sure who films her videos but he's good enough that the camera is often in the right place at the right time.
-This site should appeal to anyone looking for a 30 to 40yrs old woman who loves to have sex in front of a camera.
-To be avoided by anyone looking for waif thin teen girls having sex.
**I got access to the network for 17$ instead of 30$ by joining katie reynolds site. You simply visit Katie's site and once you click to leave then you get a pop up offer for the special price** Although I undertand why sites don't offer it upfront. I still think they'd get more business by offering it right away. |
|
07-08-11 08:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2318
|
Slut Wife Training
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The content is all exclusif.
-Most of the models appear to be true unknows so that adds a little to the sites premise.
-They have a good selection of models.
-They have 73 videos and they are at a decent 720x480 resolution.
-You get acccess to 31 other sites. |
| Cons: |
-They don't update very often. They have only added 10 videos since mbaya's June 2009 review.
-A large amount of the content on the other sites is leased material and most of it is of poor quality and pretty old.
-The models on this site also appear on a couple of the other sites and they perform similar sex acts so might not be worth downloading.
-The content isn't really dated. It's possible to find the info but it's time consuming research through the update pages.
-They have photos at a 1024x768 resolution but these can only be downloaded individually. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a decent site with some pretty well shot sex scenes. The premise is that men are sending their wives/girlfriends to Dirty D to be trained in the fine art of satisfying them. The sex is on the raunchy side with a blowbangs in most of them and anal in over a dozen videos.
-There is a lot of material to be found on some of the other sites and most of it is of similar quality as this one.
-My score is in part because you get access to many other sites and I also enjoyed the content on those sites.
**I was able to get access to the network for half the price by visiting skunk riley's site and trying to leave it. There is apop up that appears and offers you a discount. I just wish they would forgo these gimmicks and simply offer it upfront but I won't refuse the discount.** |
|
07-08-11 08:27am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
2319
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm as anal as they come about typos. I'm usually good at finding them in others text and they annoy me so there's no way I'm not going to correct them if I see them in my own
|
07-07-11 01:40pm
|
Reply
2320
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
The Collector's Comment
I recommend that you read the most recent review for her site. It was done in May of last year and I think most of your questions will be answered.
|
07-06-11 05:58am
|
Review
2321
|
The Nympho
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Alanna is a rather cute 30+ yrs old blond woman with a penchant for swinging.
-There are more than 200 videos.
There are over 400 photosets and they can all be downloaded as a complete zip file. The resolution varies a lot from set to set so it's difficult. I can confirm that many of them are at least 1152x864.
-You get access to the TAC amateur and chickpass networks. |
| Cons: |
-Their updates are dated but those dates are not worth anything since the content found on it is often much older than the date posted. I found videos from 2007 that are dated 2011.
-Their navigation system is a little confusing. You can search for videos and photosets by different categories but if that scene includes interacial, anal, and a cumshot than it's going to be located in all of these locations. Members have to be carefull not to download the same content multiple times.
-Too many of the videos are broken into 2 or more parts and they aren't huge files.
-They claim that some of their videos have dvd quality but that false. They barely qualify for moderate qulaity. I found that many videos had below average quality.
-Some of their content are scenes from swinging parties that star other internet performers so its also available on their site as well as Alanna's. |
| Bottom Line: |
-Maybe my expectation are too high for these types of sites. I mean this is suppose to be an amateur site but then again can you really call yourself an amateur if you've been doing this for more than 5 years. I think that Alanna is a cute above 30 woman with a nice body that suits her age. If only the content on this site was as good as her than she would have something special.
-I found far too many videos that were filmed using a lower quality video camera and poor lighting so that most of the videos cannot be watched full screen and often the action is difficult to make out. Then you add a less than stellar camera guy and you get a video that's blurry, semi-dark, bad camera angles and the always pleasant swinging camera because we don't want to edit that from the video.
-I downloaded about half a dozen videos but I'll only keep about 2 of those. The rest aren't worth the hard disk space.
**The only reason I gave the site a higher score than my review seems to imply it deserves is in large part because of the bonus content and the join price is less than 20$.** |
|
07-04-11 09:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2322
|
Naughty At Home
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Desirae is a hot blond all natural woman in her 40`s who does vaginal and anal sex.
-The site has restarted updating with new photos and videos.
-There are over 150 videos at the moment.
-There are over 300 photosets(see cons).
-Desirae also post info on her blog?journal |
| Cons: |
-All the videos are filmed using a tripod or an handheld camera so it's always the same shots with the same angles.
-Many of the videos have little scenarios like fucking my boss and so forth but they were all with her husband. It's pretty obvious because of the above con.
-She does have many photosets but you can only download them pic by pic. She does not offer them as a single zip file.
-Only the new content is dated and that's 4 videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
-I have had my eye on Desirae's site for many years and I thought that now would be a good time to try it since I'm in solo model site mode.
Desirae is an attractive 40 years old woman with an active sex drive and knows how to play to the camera. There is clearly a lot of great things to like about this type of site for anyone that likes or at least doesn't mind videos filmed in POV or tripod only.
-The biggest problem for me is that I don't like POV and tripod only porn. I find that it's too limiting to the viewer because there are only so many different ways to film a scene using those 2 methods. It also makes believing any scenario porn impossible because it's filmed in such a way that the fantasy is ruined.
-Desirae mentions that she recently got divorced so that could explain why she stopped updating and some of the recent changes on the site.
-My score is based on what the site offers and not what I took from it. |
|
07-03-11 12:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2323
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
A discount is the main reason why I've recently joined a couple of sites. Since these aren't well known sites then paying 30$ for content that might be less than appealing is hard to swallow but much easier if it's 15$ to 20$.
|
07-03-11 10:15am
|
Reply
2324
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
What I like the most is that if you click on the "next tour" button then it brings you to the sign up page without showing anything except that first page. Add that the fact that prior to the coming soon stuff all you had were 2 photo sets from November.
My vote is dead and major scam.
|
07-02-11 06:13pm
|
Reply
2325
|
Anal Lick Fest
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Amen Brother. PU and TBP have managed to save me a lot of money over the last few years with all the reviews of sites that I was seriously thinking of joining. There are some sites that seem to be good from the outside but are so awful once you pay your membership that many people get taken in. It's up to guys like you, me and all the other PU/TBP reviewers to warn others.
|
07-02-11 06:14am
|
