Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I enjoy a variety of porn but the kind that I love above anything else is good or if I'm lucky great scenario driven porn. Sadly that doesn't really exist anymore. For that reason I would have a site that is dedicated to shooting long scenario driven movies. I would have script and dialogue writers, professionally trained makeup artist, prop and costumer managers, multiple camera operators, good editors and most importantly a group of performers that can also act the various roles my writers would come up with.
I would have many days of rehearsal set aside to prepare the performers before shooting the various scenes. The sex scenes would be for the most part hardcore and some might even be extreme but they would have to look as fluid as possible and above all else there should be some passion happening between the various performers. In essence I want what mainstream filmmakers can do with a movie but with the added hardcore sex scenes that they can't do.
|
09-19-17 11:11am
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'll second RA's comment and add that this is a niche that is not even represented so you could corner the market. You could even be bold and maybe have some of the scenes shot in some sort of outdoor waterfall like shower or in pools.
If you think about it. You can't be the only person who has thought about what you described so if it's something you would like to see than it's almost guaranteed that it's also something that others would like to see. On a purely business point of view. Shooting that type of content would be extremely cheap because there is no sex involved. As a bonus. You could probably get more than just gay performers to appear on the site because there is no sex involved.
|
09-19-17 10:47am
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I think that inter-office dating is fine in most cases because this has the potential to become a committed relationship but a hooking up is a major no-no because it's literally the opposite and can only lead to serious issues the day after.
That said anyone considering dating a co-worker would have to make sure that neither one is a subordinate of the other, neither one works in the same department at the same time(shift-work would be okay and last but not least. Both parties have to realise that if the relationship sours and breaks up that working environment may be so bad that one or both may have to leave or worse get fired.
|
09-15-17 06:52pm
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
This one is tricky because if you are someone like me with years of surfing for porn then you are less likely to fall for a site's claims without being able to actually verify those claims. That's why when a site's main page promises great content but then don't actually show you anything then I assume that they don't have anything worth showing and move on. So for me the lack of an informative tour page is as useful as if they had multiple pages worth of info because I know exactly what I'm getting with both types of tour pages.
|
09-12-17 11:40am
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
No...No... and No.
|
09-12-17 11:22am
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
I agree that watching porn isn't cheating per say because ultimately there is no relationship between the viewer and the performers but it's a very different thing if you are interacting with a cam model or in a private booth with a stripper because there is now an actual back and forth discussion between you and those women. I'm willing to bet that you return to those same cam models and strippers on a pretty regular basis which to me means that your relationship is even deeper than you may realise.
You don't necessarily have to have sex with another woman for it to be cheating because if you interact on a personal basis with a woman that isn't your wife, girlfriend or analyst than you are going down a very slippery road that could lead to an accident.
|
09-08-17 07:52am
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not sure but exactly how would you get access to that persons computer. I could understand if this was in regards to a library computer or some kind of internet café but in both of those cases I have a strong feeling that they will have some pretty limiting filters to prevent people from surfing for porn and even if they wouldn't then why would you want to surf for porn in those venues?
|
09-05-17 08:28am
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Although billing and bandwidth are two things that could be an issue. They rarely are for me because I only join sites who used certain CC Processor and I've only got burned once due to slow bandwidth.
My biggest fear with most networks is terrible navigation because by their very nature these networks have huge libraries of content and if it's difficult or complicated to find that content then ultimately I will be very disappointed with my membership.
|
09-05-17 08:25am
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Usually it's the model featured on thumbnail that is at the core of why I might be interested.
|
08-26-17 09:42am
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Since there are so few new sites then what I mostly do is keep track of updates on existing sites so the date of the content is usually what I use as my main search tool.
|
08-24-17 06:26am
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I've been watching a wide variety of porn for three decades so it can be argued that I probably did but
it wasn't be any insight on my part so much as it was something new to watch and I did. That said I would love to know what kind of niche that was once unpopular or non-existent and became popular the poster is thinking about in his poll question.
|
08-21-17 07:47am
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I think it would be a great addition to the site but it might be wise to advise the webmasters that although we are a polite group of people. We are also a very knowledgeable and opinionated group as well.
|
08-19-17 09:40am
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I wouldn't be surprised if Cercei met with a well deserved death but they may want to keep it for the last season. The one that is unlikely to survive beyond this season is Littlefinger. If last nights episode is anything to go by then Arya is about to show him her power of disguise.
|
08-14-17 07:27am
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
I picked location because none of the others are even remotely important to me. That said I prefer that the cum shot be as fluid as possible so that means that if it's a vaginal penetration scene than the cum shot should be either internal or near the vagina. If it's anal than the cum shot should be on the ass or back. Internal anal cum shots are fairly unhealthy. If it's a BJ with cum shot than anywhere other than the face because I really like REALLY dislike facial cum shots.
|
08-12-17 08:33am
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I haven't and I don't plan to. At least not for the immediate future.
|
08-08-17 11:05am
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I don't necessarily dislike those types of scenes but ultimately I prefer scenario driven porn and that kind of thing doesn't make any sense in porn with a story so I prefer not to see it. Mind you it's quite rare to see this in todays porn than it was in the late 90's early 2000. I remember studios like Extreme Associates and JM productions who had plenty of movies with girls drinking multiple cum shots out of glasses.
|
08-06-17 10:32am
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
It's probably around 30% but I've been watching porn for a few decades now so the number of bygone performers VS new ones is so much higher that it's no contest. In fact I much prefer older porn to the stuff made in the last decade that it makes sense for me to prefer older performers.
The only kind of porn that is superior to anything from the past is lesbian porn.
|
08-04-17 05:28pm
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I tend to agree with Jay and l2k that the hunt is a lot of fun because there is always the hope that there is something better just over the next rise.
Sadly for me is that there often isn't anything better.
|
08-02-17 03:04pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I dislike POV because ultimately it limits the kind of shots that are possible and it's these extra shots that when use properly can significantly increase the quality of a scene.
The only director who uses POV on a regular basis and whose work I enjoy is Pierre Woodman.
|
07-31-17 06:02pm
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer to click on links but I'll gladly write the link if I have to.
|
07-27-17 05:58pm
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I like the "what's hot" section because I will sometime find a site that I didn't know existed or see an offer for a site that I was curious about but would not have joined at their original price.
That said I don' think any site with a score that's below 70% should be included in the section because the site barely gets a passable note so ultimately there is nothing hot about the site. I will add that sites without scores should also be excluded from this section because if there is no score than exactly how sure can anyone be that the offer is hot?
|
07-26-17 06:28am
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
For me the cost is the measuring stick I use when it comes to exclusive content. I don't mind paying more for something that I can't get anywhere else but balk if I'm expected to pay a lot of money for content that is leased.
|
07-24-17 11:54am
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
The bigger a site is the more important the option is because having to go through dozens of pages of video file to find what you want is one thing but when that number is in the hundreds than that is another thing completely.
|
07-24-17 11:46am
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I got my learner at 16 and my driver licence at 17.
|
07-19-17 07:50am
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I don't like watching orgies on TV so I sure as hell don't want to participate in one.
|
07-18-17 11:21am
|