-Good download speeds. I get 4-5 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Zip file for each photo set.
Cons:
The cons are basically minor. The site (and network) offers excellent value for your money.
-Pre-checked cross-sell on join page.
-There is no information about the models (except for links to their content). Some bio would help to establish a connection to the girls in the viewer's mind. A large part of porn is psychological (in addition to the physical part).
-Use of toys. This is frequent in lesbian sex. Some members dislike toys. It's a non-issue for me.
-Teen Mega World is basically bread-and-butter hardcore sex. There is little glamour. Not much effort is made to present the girls as attractively as possible, either in costumes, make-up, settings, whatever. But these girls are, in the main, naturally young and attractive. So their attractiveness shines through.
-Site started in late 2007, and stopped updating in early 2009. This is common in the Teen Mega World network: they start a site, and stop updating not long afterward. But it's a marketing decision.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
The network has so many different sites, they don't have the financial resources to update them. And they believe that a large number of sites will attract subscribers, even if most of those sites are not updating. So that policy breeds some resentment from members, who want their favorite sites to keep updating.
-Video files and photo sets download with a generic filename. So have to rename the files to identify the models, date posted, site.
-The streaming quality of the earliest videos is poor. Better to download in the high definition, and watch the file with your PC software.
In spite of the grainy visuals and fake moaning, the girls are having fun, giggling and being playful with each other, and it helps the scenes.
BOTTOM LINE:
The site is part of the Teen Mega World network.
The site theme is lesbian love. Or lesbian sex.
Site stats:
60 videos.
60 photo sets (a matching photo set for each video).
-The main selling points for the site (and the network)
1. Cute Eastern European girls--mainly Russian and surrounding areas. These are young teenagers, white, slender, suprisingly attractive.
2. Many of the scenes are enjoyable or hot. The girls really seem to be enjoying the sex.
3. Easy navigation. There is an excellent model page listing, with nice-sized thumbnails of each model, hot links to her videos (and matching photosets). Simple site layout. Easy to switch between sites, without having to re-login to each new site with your username and password
4. Lesbian sex is a change of pace from the usual boy-girl or boy-girl-girl or other variations on boys-girls sex.
5. Can download videos in choice of high or medium definition. Choose the high definition. The file size is not that large, and the videos were shot years ago, so the quality is below what is seen for most high definition videos.
The bottom line is the site (and the network) offers excellent value for your money. As long as you know what to expect.
The network offers a wide variety of niches, of hardcore teen sex. Bread-and-butter. Not glamorized. But often times hot. And with a lot of attractive young girls. For a very low price.
Giving the site a score of 85. That is because the site is part of Teen Mega World, and you get access to the Teen Mega World network. But the site itself would be in the 90s if they added more content in the same vein as the older content.
Micky D charges about $1 for their coffee or iced tea. With free refills.
So if you add a lot of sugar, it's OK to drink.
Except I've been reading lately that sugar is bad for your health. Bad for blood pressure and other problems.
The older I get, the fewer things I find that are good for you. Except porn?
I've started commenting on some of the photo sets at Met-Art recently.
But I almost never rate the photo sets/videos. For any of the paysites I join.
And I pay almost no attention to the scores for the photo sets/videos, since they have almost zero value for my appreciation of the photo seta/videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-High quality photography, mostly softcore approach, more erotic than the MetArt style.
-PU discounted price $19.99/month.
Occasionally MetArt will send out emails for discounted prices to one or more of their sites.
-The main attraction of this site (and the Met-Art network) is the quality of the models: these are late teens or early twenties girls who are attractive to extremely attractive. The girls are natural: almost no boob jobs. Young. Fresh. Very few tattoos or piercings.
-Zip files for each photoset. Choice of definition of low, medium, or high.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded.
If downloaded, offered a choice of low, medium or high definition.
If streamed, offered a choice of low, medium or high definition.
-Excellent download speeds. I get 4-5 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Zip files filename includes: NameOfSite_DatePosted_SetTitle_Model'sName_Photographer'sName_FileDefinition.
So the name of the file includes all the data needed.
Cons:
-Pre-checked offer on join page for subscription to a different site.
This pre-checked offer is slightly different from the normal pre-checked offer.
Instead of using a checked box, you see a drop-down box, that states: "Yes, add 30 days of Met-Art.com for $29.99, rebilling monthly". So change that option to "No thanks, I'm not interested in this special offer".
Because there are cheaper ways to join Met-Art.com, with PU discount, or otherwise.
-I'm not a fan of their software mechanism to view the photosets online. I think it's slow and clunky. Much easier to just download the gallery as a zip file and then browse the photos. Teen Mega World has a much easier and faster system to view the photos online. Suprising, because The Life Erotic is a high-level photo site, and Teen Mega World is a bread-and-butter hardcore site.
-The site often uses low lighting for the photo sets. This is an artistic choice. But sometimes the photos are too dark.
Bottom Line:
The Life Erotic is part of the MetArt network.
As such, expect high quality photo sets.
The photo sets and videos are more erotic than MetArt's softcore approach.
I feel the photo sets and videos at The Life Erotic are basically in the softcore style.
These are very attractive models, and instead of admiring them like you would at MetArt, you
want to do naughty things to the girls (appealing to the baser instincts in the audience).
I've said this is a softcore site. But the site is actually borderline softcore/midcore.
The girls often masturbate. They can stick fingers or a dildo inside their pussy. They can use a vibrator. They can have lesbian sex with another girl. There can be a slight bondage theme. These actions go far beyond what is at MetArt.
Take Julla, for example. The set titled "My Hideaway", posted 2015-06-15. Julla is small (5'3") with short blonde hair. Cute face. Slender body. Small breasts. She's laying back on a couch, legs spread wide, her bra halfway down her
waist. It's a slow strip-tease. But instead of admiring her lovely form, you want to jump on that body and fuck her brains out. Dirty thoughts. But she is to blame. The set is softcore. There is no overt masturbation. But it does have heat.
You don't think that way looking at most MetArt sets. The MetArt girls are lovely, but semi-detached visions. So the dirty thoughts are less often. You just think how lovely and delectable the MetArt girls are.
I'm not saying all the The Life Erotic sets have this level of eroticism, but the overall approach at this site is more erotic than the MetArt photosets. That's for sure.
A short MetArt review:
Even though the models range from attractive to absolutlely stunning, the photosets are softcore, and lack heat.
The videos are mainly a waste of time. The girls may be stunning, they are naked, but the videos are boring.
I'm not saying MetArt is poor. I think it's the best site on the internet for softcore, high grade photography of nude teens. I paid for a lifetime membership to MetArt because I was tired of paying for monthly and yearly subscriptions.
But there are other sites that feature high grade photography, that often have more heat or eroticism.
MetArt is a megasite
Galleries: 15,645
Videos: 1,286
Models: 3,189
The Life Erotic is smaller than MetArt, but it's still a large site:
Galleries: 1,739
Videos: 629
Models: 850
I definitely think The Life Erotic is worth at least a one-month membership, if you can find the galleries or videos that appeal to your personal taste. 1,739 galleries is a lot to examine in one month's time, so maybe you might think the site
is worth a longer subscription.
Especially if you come across one of the random offers to join at a very discounted price.
A few years ago, I found an offer to join Erotic Beauty (part of the MetArt network) for $1/month, and I've been a member of that site since that time. $1/month won't even pay for a cup of coffee at McDonald's. I went to a restaurant today,
ordered an iced tea (non-alcoholic), and they charged me $3.00. It pays to look at the prices before you order. Except some restaurants leave off the prices for some items, like non-alcoholic drinks, from the menu.
I'm giving The Life Erotic a score of 90. This is a site with high-grade photography of teen and early-twenties models who are attractive to lovely. It's a large site, with a lot of galleries and videos to browse. The style is more erotic than MetArt, but it's still softcore (or maybe midcore). You find solo female masturbation, with fingers or toys. Also lesbian
sex. But no boy-girl sex that I have found.
Minor note: The Julla photo set that I referred to: She does stick a finger inside her pussy near the end of the photo set. But this is a photo set, not a video. And I think it's more like a tease. Not masturbation. But you could call it borderline masturbation.
Using the PU link to Goddess Nudes, and then hitting the join page link, you see the prices:
$29.99/month recurring
$39.99 for 1 month (non-recurring)
$99.99/year recurring
This is a big jump for the monthly price, which used to be $9.99 (recurring).
I was a member 1 or 2 years ago (my memory is getting terrible as I get older), and they had a banner on the site that counted off the days before I would have access to all three sites.
As i wrote in my review:
1. Join Teen Mega World directly (through PU link) for $14.95. That gives you access to NylonsX as well.
2. If you join NylonsX directly (through PU link), that costs $19.95/month.
I gave NylonsX a high score, because I was really giving the score to Teen Mega World. NylonsX is a small site, stopped updating years ago.
Do not expect a lot of content from NylonsX. Do not expect videos that focus on nylons, women's underwear, strip tease, or eroticism.
The girls start out wearing nylons or some underwear, but little attention is paid to the nylons or underwear--it's just a gimmick to create a new site. Teen Mega World has many different sites, and they try to supply material for most niches, as a marketing tool.
If you like Teen Mega World, and I do, it's because of the attractive young models. There are lesbian videos (and at least one lesbian site) at TMW, but most of the content is Boy-Girl.
There are no lesbian videos at NylonsX.
There are 2 videos of a female model masturbating by herself.
But all the other videos are Boy-Girl sex.
Join Teen Mega World for hardcore teen sex. On a more bread-and-butter style than the Diesel network.
But with your membership to Diesel network, you already have access to a ton of high quality teen hardcore sex, that is usually more glamorized than Teen Mega World. And the models at Diesel can be stunning to lovely.
If you haven't explored the three sites you have access to at Diesel, you really should.
All three sites, as far as I can tell, have the same basic focus: attractive teens in softcore or hardcore sex. Years ago, there were many more sites in the Diesel network, but then they merged the sites into 18 Only Girls (they dropped some of the old sites completely, and dropped some of the content from the sites they did merge).
But you really should examine each Diesel site, because there is a ton of worthwhile content at all three sites.
It used to be that if you stayed a member of 18OnlyGirls, WowGirls, or WowPorn for a certain amount of time, you automatically became a member of all three sites.
Is that still the way it works?
And how long do you have to stay a member at one of the sites, to automatically gain access to all three sites?
There was a separate method of gaining access to all three sites, if you paid a higher membership fee.
Or if you paid an upgrade fee after you joined one of their sites, to get access to all three sites.
I assume, since your membership is over 3 months, that you now have access to all 3 sites.
Correct?
The girls at the 3 sites are extremely attractive. And the videos, as you wrote, are top quality, as well.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Uncensored Japanese porn (no mosaic effect to hide the genitals).
-$19.95/month with PU discount.
-Epoch is the biller. A trusted name.
-Can stream or download the videos.
--Each video gives you streaming choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Each video download gives you choice of 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-The codec for the files is extremely efficient. The file size for a download is amazingly small.
For example, a video with a runtime of 12 minutes 48 seconds, has a file size of:
240p 56 MB
480p 102 MB
720p 195 MB
1080p 377 MB
-Each video has a matching photoset.
-The software mechanism to view all the photos in a photoset online is easy to use.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sell on the join page.
-Poor search engine. If you enter a model's name, it returns her name and many different names.
-No zip file for any photo set.
-Some of the photos are not well-focused. Not well cropped. I'm assuming there is some software that creates a photo set from a video, and that is how the photo sets are produced--instead of using the traditional method of shooting a photo set with a camera, you shoot a video, and use software to create the photo set from the video. That is my guess on how the photo sets are created at some porn sites. This makes a better-looking product than the older style screencaps.
If anyone has knowledge about this process, I would certainly appreciate either denial or confirmation of my theory.
-Download speeds average 1 to 2 MB/sec. Not terrible, but could be improved.
Bottom Line:
Site themes: blowjobs. facials. cum swallowing. asian models. uncensored (no mosaic) hd porn.
Site statistics: 1,138 videos.
There's not a lot of variety in the scenes.
The videos are mainly a girl giving a blowjob to one or more guys.
You have one girl doing one guy, two guys, three guys, a bunch of guys.
Personally, this is not my favorite niche. I don't care how cute the girl is, it's hard for the girl to look cute or attractive when she has one or more cocks stuffed in her mouth. That's just my opinion.
You have over 1,100 scenes of models giving blowjobs. To add a little variety, you can throw in some masturbation with toys. Also some fucking.
In one scene, a Japanese schoolgirl is playing a video game on her cellphone, and licking an ice cream cone. She is so engrossed in the game, that when a boy pulls down his pants and puts his cock against her lips and against the ice cream
cone, she starts licking the cock as well as the ice cream.
Then the boy takes the ice cream cone away from her, and she continues licking his cock, while still staring at the cellphone game she has continued to play. Finally, the boy pushes his cock against her lips a few times, and she seems to notice his cock for the first time, and says "What are you doing?" (I'm guessing at what she says, because the language is Japanese.)
She pushes the boy away, lays down on the couch, and continues playing her cellphone game. The boy and another guy come back, touch her ass. she ignores them while playing the video game. The two guys use vibrators on her pussy, and undress
her, and she gives one a blow job.
There's almost a zen-like quality to the video. The first guy, who puts his penis against the girl's mouth while she is licking the ice cream cone, seems almost simple-minded.
However, the girl is almost simple-minded as well, because when the boy puts his penis against her mouth, she continues to lick the ice cream cone, as well as the boy's penis, and she seems unaware that she is licking a penis.
It's not like she is being naughty or mischievous, she is acting as if she's completely unaware there is a penis on her tongue, and she is totally focused on the cell phone game she is playing (as well as the ice cream cone she's licking).
I think the porn director is referencing George Lucas' Jedi wisdom, that states "Your focus is your reality".
The girl's reality is the video game, plus the ice cream cone. And the penis does not intrude.
I can't say the video is that hot or sexy. But it can be amusing.
For one thing, you wonder when the girl will wake up and notice she is licking the guy's penis. Even when he takes the ice cream cone away from her, she continues playing the video game, and licking his penis, but pretending the guy is not there.
Only when he pushes his penis against her, trying to force it into her mouth, does she seem to wake up and realize what is going on, and she tells the guy and his buddy (the buddy has been watching the action) to get lost.
The two guys leave the room momentarily, then return while the girl is stretched out on a couch still playing the game.
The guys remove the girl's panties, use a vibrator on her, and she finally wakes up to what they are doing, protests, but then is forced (with no violence) to give one a blowjob while the other guy fucks her with a vibrating dildo.
This is a strange or amusing video, but it's not really hot. It's more like: What the fuck????
If you like watching blowjobs or facials, this might hit your button.
Otherwise, the site gets boring very fast.
As I said, I don't think it improves a girl's allure when she has one or more penises stuck in her mouth. I much prefer traditional fucking.
Let me compare this site to Rocco Siffredi site. Almost all the Rocco Siffredi videos feature some cocksucking or blowjobs, along with vaginal and/or anal fucking, plus ass rimming. The Rocco Siffredi videos can be very hot. The sex is forceful. The videos are professionally shot, but with an amateur feel. The lighting and colors and camera work are just OK, but far below what you can get at sites like X-Art or ferame. But that is deliberate, Rocco Siffredi is trying to give you an atmosphere of "You are there, watching the action". And the action can be intense. It's not as cruel as Pierre Woodman, but the girls are definitely feeling some pain when the stunt cock (mainly Rocco Siffredi) rams his cock down their throat and makes them gag. Or pushes his penis into their ass or vagina with force.
Whereas ferame is almost entirely cocksucking. But on a much milder level than Rocco Siffredi. So there's less heat in the ferame videos.
Giving the ferame site a score of 70. That is very subjective. If you are a fan of blowjobs or facials, this site probably deserves a much higher score. You get over 1,100 videos, professionally shot, well lighted, good camera-work, good sound control. The video quality is excellent, but the content gets boring fast.
I think fans should choose what appeals to them.
However, I pay almost no attention to porn awards.
And even though I sometimes watch the Academy Awards, I pay little attention to them regarding what movies I watch.
Because my enjoyment of a particular movie bears no relation to its Academy Award performance.
Also, my enjoyment of a particular movie bears no relation to its box office performance.
-Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name.
-Zip file for each photo set.
-Fast download speeds. I was getting 5 MB/sec download speeds, which is my maximum download speed.
-Download managers are allowed at site. I use Down Them All, a free download manager which is easy to use.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded.
-The site (and network) are easy to navigate. Even though the network is huge (over 4,000 videos), the model index, hot links, and search engine make it easy to find good videos of your favorite models or type of sex.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Remember to uncheck if you don't want the trial subscription.
-The site advertises "Constant Updates With Fresh Teen Videos". This is misleading. You get updates for the Teen Mega World network, but NylonsX site stopped updating in 2012. Teen Mega World network updates with one video and matching photo set per day.
-Because the site stopped updating in 2012, the site offers fewer choices in the download file definitions for videos:
Many of the other sites in the network offer 1080p, 720p, 540p, and 405p (for mobile).
At NylonsX, the choices are limited to 720p and 540p.
-Only one definition for the zip file photo set. At many porn sites, you get a choice of high, medium or low definition for zip file download.
-Photo set zips and videos download with generic numeric file names. So you have to re-name each file with model's name, date posted, site.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics: 32 videos and matching galleries.
Site theme: girls wearing pantyhose or stockings having sex.
The site was started in February 2012, and stopped updating in October 2012.
That is a shame. Because some of the models that appear at the site are very attractive and the sex can be hot.
The sex can be a single girl masturbating, with her fingers or a toy, or a boy and girl fucking (vaginal or anal), with some cocksucking for variety.
The site (and Teen Mega World network) features what I think of as bread-and-butter sex:
The videos are plain: the costumes are inexpensive, the storyline/plot is almost non-existent. The production values are basic.
However, the videos are professionally shot: the lighting is good, good sound control, good camera-work (not a lot of jerky movements, mainly good framing of the sex action, good focus), etc.
You don't get the high-end glamour videos you will find at a site like X-Art, where the videos are not just professionally shot, but the production values are much higher, and the lighting, costumes (what costumes there are), and sets are more expensive. The videos at X-Art are high-quality porn of extremely good-looking girls having sex. Even at X-Art there is almost no plot or story, before the girl starts masturbating or the girl and guy start fucking. But X-Art is high quality porn, where they choose their models for the physical attractiveness, and then put extra effort into tapeing or photographing the girls to emphasize their beauty.
Teen Mega World gives you over 4,000 videos for a very low price, of hardcore teen sex, in a variety of niches. X-Art gives you over 700 videos for a higher price. But the models range from attractive to lovely, and it's one of the best glamcore sites available.
Both sites feature young models, with sex that can be interesting or hot. Both sites are worth joining. But it depends on personal taste, which site will give you the best value.
Note: If you join NylonsX directly with a PU discount, the price is $19.95/month.
If you join Teen Mega World directly (with a PU discount), the price is $14.95/month.
I'm giving NylonsX a score of 92, because it's part of the Teen Mega World network, and I'm really giving the score to the network. My personal opinion is that Teen Mega World gives a lot of value for your porn dollars. As long as you know what you are getting, and enjoy bread-and-butter teen hardcore sex. Of young, pretty girls.
If NylonsX was a separate, stand-alone site, with no access to other sites, I would give NylonsX a score in the 50s or 60s, because it's a small site that stopped updating years ago. And the few videos at the site are not exceptional enough
to raise the score to the 70s. But I am a sucker for some of the models in the videos. I don't know how to explain it, but even though this is not a glamcore site, I think some of these models are extremely desirable. This is personal taste. If you don't find the models attractive, you could rate the stand-alone site in the 50s.
I use Firefox exclusively, and DownThemAll is also my exclusive download manager.
So your comment holds extra meaning for me.
If a site has streaming problems, that obviously makes it less attractive for me.
I'm not a member of Sexy Hub or Dane Jones.
Lately, I seem to have playback issues with smooth streaming at some paysites I do belong to. I suspect it's because I have too many programs running on my PC, or because I've overloaded my drive too much, and it needs more free space to run streaming smoothly.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main attraction of the site is Japanese porn that is not pixellated (no mosaic censorship over the genitals).
-PU discounted membership of $19.95/month
-Epoch is billing agent. A trusted name.
-Large site. 942 videos. Same number of accompanying galleries.
-Multiple choices for streaming: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-The same multiple choices for download: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-The file name includes the name of the model. But it's better to rename the file with the date it was posted to the site, and the name of the site.
-The videos are professionally shot. Good camera work, good lighting, sound control.
-The videos have the posting date to the site.
-There is an element of Japanese flavor to the videos, which can make them slightly more interesting than the regular American or European porn. This can be positive or negative.
-Site is part of the JAV HD network. Membership in the site gives access to the full JAV network, and vice versa.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Search engine is poor. Enter the name of the model, and the search returns her name a bunch of names that are not hers.
-The Japanese models can make funny noises during sex, which can be annoying.
-The Japanese are big on vibrators, of different sizes and colors, and love to use them on the models. If you don't like sex toys, you won't appreciate many of the videos.
-Some members might be disappointed that the Japanese sex scenes are not hugely different from American or European sex scenes. Like the old wives' tale how Asian women have a "sideways vagina". Women are women. There are physiological
differences between races, but there's also a lot of nonsense about the differences.
-No zip file for the photo sets.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics: 942 videos.
Site theme: girls with pubic hair.
Site contents: uncensored (no pixillation) videos and photos of Japanese models having sex.
Some people think girls with pubic hair are attractive. Other people think pubic hair is dirty or unpleasant, and think all girls should feature the "nude" pussy that is so common in today's porn models.
Actually, it's not just porn models who have the hairless pussy fashion.
I did a google search, and found what I thought was an interesting result:
From 2 studies done in 2014 on 1,100 college-student participants (671 self-reported women, and 439 self-reported men),
nearly half the men in the study said they’d shaved off all their pubic hair at least once in the previous four weeks.
I had my pubic hair shaved for an operation once (I was in a hospital at the time), but never bothered shaving or trimming it myself.
About 95% of people in the study said they’d done some sort of pubic hair removal at least once in the past four weeks.
This would include minor trimming to a complete shave.
I don't think the hair down below grows all that long, anyway. It's not like the hair on your head, which just keeps growing longer.
(This review is getting a little strange. But interesting, I hope.)
My pubic hair, which is over 30 years old (since I was shaved for that operation), is less than 2 inches long. On some hairy models, the pubic hair might be over 2 inches long, but still under 4 inches. So even with a "jungle look", pubic hair is still short.
But I have read many complaints at porn sites when a model has pubic hair. They say the model is unclean, or less attractive, and should be bald down there. As if that was the way nature intended. Or God intended. Or fashion intended.
Or some other reason, that seems to be implied, but not always stated.
There are porn sites that serve the hairy niche. Hairy AV (part of JAV HD network) is one.
ATK Natural & Hairy is another.
Love Hairy (part of MetArt network) is another site.
Japanese porn seems to love vibrators. Dildos are also popular, but not as popular as vibrators. The vibrators come in all sizes and shapes, from very tiny to the industrial-sized. They also come in all colors.
I went on the U.S. version of Amazon.com, and they have 123 pages of vibrators.
The Amazon.com page shows 24 varieties of vibrators per page.
Counting duplicate listings, that would be almost 3,000 models of vibrators.
So I guess that vibrators are more popular in America than I realized.
I've been watching porn for years now, but I still have a lot to learn.
Maybe the Japanese aren't so crazy after all. They love vibrators, just like Americans. And Europeans. And maybe Africans, as well.
Basic site overview: Hairy AV focuses on hairy Japanese models. The videos and photos are not censored, which is the primary selling point of the site. The models are attractive. The videos are professionally shot, so you get crisp, clear views of these lovely girls in a wide variety of sex acts: blowjobs, self masturbation, masturbation from one or more men on a single women (anyway from 1 to 5 or 6 men on the same woman), vaginal and anal fucking (mostly vaginal), titty fucking, etc.
So the sex can be hot. But it's not excessively forceful or cruel. It's not the hard gonzo sex you see on some European sites. The sex is more consensual, where the woman's pleasure is important, and it's not just the guys getting off.
You have access to the 942 videos at the site, with almost daily updates of a single video per day, but you also have access to all the JAV HD sites, which has 16 sites and 16,528 videos in different categories.
Note: I suspect the 16,529 videos is a slight exaggeration of the site statistic, because it probably contains some videos that are posted to different sites in the network, possibly with different titles for the same video. Because I have found some videos that are posted to more than one site, and the same video will have a different title depending on which site the video is posted to.
Note: If you join through the JAV HD site, the PU discounted price is $39.99/month. This gives access to the whole JAV HD network.
But if you join through the Hairy AV site, the PU discounted price is $19.99/month. This gives you access to the whole JAV HD network, as well.
Giving the site a score of 80. You get access to 942 videos at the site, over 15,000 at the network, uncensored, high quality videos of attractive Japanese models engaging in hot sex. So it's worth considering, if you want a change from the American or European porn you've become accustomed to.
But don't expect a massive difference between the Japanese porn and the American or European porn you've already seen, if you have at least a moderate amount of porn experience. Sex is sex. The flavor might be Japanese, but it's not watching Aliens from Beyond in sexual heat that will blow your mind.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount for $19.95/month if you join the site directly.
But join through Teen Mega World site for $14.95/month, which gives you full access to First BGG and all the other sites in the Teen Mega World network.
-Can stream or download the videos.
-Videos have multiple choices of definition for download.
For download, all videos have low, medium, and high definition. The newer videos from June 2014 on have a 1080p definition as well.
-A major plus is that the models are attractive to very attractive.
These are young, white teenagers from Eastern Europe, slender bodies. Natural. Very few tattoos, little piercing. Almost no fake breasts. Not a huge amount of annoying fake moans and groans.
-There is a gallery to illustrate each video. Gives you a clear, fast idea of what the action is. The photos are crisp, good quality.
-Zip file for each gallery.
Cons:
-Infrequent updates. Recent update rate is one video in a month or in two months.
-Small site. Only 82 videos (and matching photo sets).
-Videos stream in only one definition. No choice of low, medium or high.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics: Site has 82 videos and matching photo sets.
The recent update rate is erratic: maybe one video plus photo set in one or two months.
Site theme: The videos are supposed to be the first time a boy and 2 girls have sex together, at the same time.
So there's obviously a bit of fantasy element here, that these girls are first-timers having sex with each other and a boy, since you've seen these girls in many other videos having sex, and it's not that big a stretch to think these girls
are porn pros who've done it all.
But suspend your disbelief, and enjoy the action. The girls are cute, and they are not shy. They are kissing and petting and fingering each other, and the boy is just another sex tool for the girls to get off. A sex tool they enjoy sharing in creative ways. And the boy is a young stud, who does his best to satisfy both of the girls, as well as satisfying himself.
The first videos at the site are dated April and May, 2009.
The earliest videos have 3 definitions for download: low (for mobile), medium, and high definition. Low definition is 405p, medium definition is 540p, and high definition is 720p.
Starting in June 2014, they began offering 1080p downloads for their newer videos.
The models can be attractive to very attractive.
Sheri Vi, Juliya B, Ada, Angel, Caroline, Grace C, Rebecca, Dora C, Izi, Gabi, Taissia, Inga E, Alice C, Milana Fox, Ariadna and some of the other teens can be featured at sites like MetArt, 18OnlyGirls, DigitalDesire, and other well-known
porn sites.
So the girls are mainly good-looking teenagers.
With firm bodies: firm ass, pert tits, cute faces, and the enthusiasm to fuck-fuck-fuck.
The stunt cocks do a good job with the girls.
The videos are professionally shot. Good camera work, good lighting, good colors, good sound control.
This is not a glamour site (or network), it's bread-and-butter sex, little or no romance to the sex, but the girls are both hot and willing.
The site (and network) is well-designed, to make it easy to use. There is a model listing, with nice-sized thumbnails to show you what the models look like, with hot links to all the models videos. There is a basic search, and an advanced
search.
The site only has 82 videos, but you also get access to the full Teen Mega World network, which has 4285 videos of mainly hardcore teen sex, in many different niches. So you will get a huge amount of content for your money. If you like teen sex, hardcore, without a lot of glamour, this site/network should be a candidate for your porn dollars.
Note: A lot of the sites in the network either do not update or update rarely. This can annoy some members.
Almost all the videos are in some Eastern European language, when the models speak.
The videos at some of the sites are very old, and in poor quality. The models might be attractive, but it's annoying that the video quality is so poor. Because those models retired years ago, and you won't be able to find better quality videos
of those models.
Some members are annoyed by the adds for other porn sites on each page at the site.
Some members are annoyed by the fake cum shots in the videos.
So there can be negative psychological elements about enjoying this site or network.
But: put these annoying elements aside. Enjoy the site and network for what it is. A boatload of hardcore teen sex of attractive girls, for a very low price ($14.95/month if you join through the Teen Mega World site, $19.95/month if you join through the First BGG site).
I'm giving the site a score of 92. Because of the very attractive models. Because of the hot sex. Because you get full access to the Teen Mega World network. Because of the low price.
Add it all up, and I think it's a great value, for your money. That's my opinion, anyway.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discounted price $14.95/month.
-Good download speeds. I get 3-4 MB/sec, and my max download speed is about 5 MB/sec.
-Multiple choices for download videos: low (for mobile), medium, high resolution.
-No download limits.
-Professionally shot videos and photo sets. Good camera-work, good lighting, good colors, good focus, good sound control.
-Excellent model page with nice-sized thumbnails for each model, with links to her videos.
Cons:
-As long as you like young white teens who enjoy sex, this site has only minor flaws.
-Pre-checked cross sale on the join page.
-Not a lot of diversity in the models: they are late teens, early twenties, mainly attractive to very attractive.
Mainly white Eastern European girls.
-The videos download with a numerical file name. Have to rename the files to know who the model is, posting date to site, etc.
-The earliest dated videos are not as sharp as the later ones, but the quality improved rapidly over time.
-Only one definition for streaming videos.
-Streaming videos stutter. So download the file, and watch the downloaded file.
Edit: I suspect the stuttering is my fault: I've probably overloaded my PC drive with too many files, and that might be the cause of the stuttering. So my apologies to the TMW server.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: anal intercourse.
Site statistics:
168 videos.
168 matching galleries.
Teen Mega World has found angels to perform for us sex-starved fans.
The models are slender, attractive Russian or Eastern European girls, who display enthusiasm for getting fucked in the vagina, the ass, the mouth, and getting splattered with cum.
The girls are not only young teens, they are also hot.
The girls are mainly natural: Very little tattoos, piercings, or fake breasts.
There's a comment section for the videos and galleries.
There's not a lot of comments for each video or gallery, but it gives you an idea of what members think.
The comments are generally positive.
The members like how attractive the models are, how hot they can be in the sex scenes.
Each video has an accompanying gallery, which is a photo record of the video. But the gallery photos are surprisingly good: The photos are not the typical screen shots you see at some of
the older porn sites, but nicely framed, crisp photos. I assume they are buying/using some automatic software program that
makes excellent photos from a video shoot. Because you don't see the photo flashes that were evident from years ago when people were making a video shoot and a photo shoot at the same time, and the result was annoying flashing lights going off in the video shoot.
With a membership to Anal Angels, you also get access to the entire Teen Mega World network. And vice versa. Membership to Teen Mega World gives you full access to Anal Angels.
That is important, because even though Anal Angels has 168 videos, you get access to over 4,000 videos at Teen Mega World, in many different teen niches. Which increases the value of a membership greatly.
Anal Angels focuses on anal sex. But it also throws in pussy fucking and cock licking and pussy licking.
So the site is for porn members who love this niche.
With 168 videos (and matching galleries), there's a lot of content.
But anal lovers also get another site in the Teen Mega World network called Anal Beauty, which has 69 videos (and matching galleries).
The Gag-n-Gape site also features a lot of anal sex.
And there are also anal scenes mixed in with the other sites in the Teen Mega World network.
So for fans of anal sex, Teen Mega World gives you a lot of interesting content for your money.
I'm not a fan of anal sex, but because the models are so attractive, and the sex can be so hot, I think even people who don't care for anal sex will find a lot to like at this site, and the Teen Mega World network as a whole.
You get a real smorgasbord of niches at Teen Mega World. Although the emphasis is on young teen girls, you also get a few sites that are off the beaten road:
Old-n-Young, where older men make it with young girls.
el Porno Latino, featuring latino girls.
Latin Shemales, a shemale site.
Shemale Access, another shemale site. Boys Love 18, a gay site for boys.
The sites above are tiny, are not updating, and have older content. If you want to scan the contents, since you already have a membership to the network, go ahead. But you wouldn't join the site or network for acccess to those sites, since the content is so small, and the quality is poor (poor visuals, poor sound control).
Giving the site and network a score of 92. Because you get a huge amount of good quality videos and galleries for your money, in the anal and other niches, of attractive teen girls who do a good job of demonstrating their appetite for sex.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $14.95/month. Regular price is $29.95/month. But I have also seen where the "regular price" is $39.95/month.
-Epoch is the payment processor, a trusted name.
-There is an accompanying gallery for each video. The quality of the photos is quite good, especially for a hardcore teen video site. Good focus, good definition, good lighting.
-There is a zip file for each gallery.
-I really like the software mechanism the site uses, to allow you to easily view online each photo in any gallery, or to enlarge the photo with a single click.
-The quality of the models is extremely good. The models are mainly late teens, mainly attractive to very attractive. White Eastern European females.
-Female models have very little tattoos or piercings.
-The sex can be good to very hot.
-There is a good model index, which has nice-sized thumbnails of the model and hot links to her videos.
-Good download speeds. I average 3-4 MB/sec.
Cons:
-Some members complain the creampies are obviously fake.
-Pre-checked offer on join page, that renews at high price unless you un-check the offer, or cancel very fast.
-I have what I consider a fast connection (which might be slow compared to some PU members: My max download speed is about 5 MB/sec, which is the equivalent of 40 Mb/sec. Capital B stands for byte. Lower case b stands for bit.)
But when I stream some videos, the video stutters or plays unevenly. It's not a smooth experience. I don't know if this is a personal computer problem, or whether the site servers have some problem.
So the solution is to download the video file, and watch the playback on Windows Media Player, or VLC Player. But it's not as convenient as streaming the video.
-No model biography or personal data.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: creampies. A creampie is the guy ejaculating inside the girl's pussy or anus, or when the cum drips out.
The site started in May, 2011. So it's been around almost 5 years now. The site currently has 167 videos. The update rate varies. You get between 0 or 3 videos per month. So don't expect a lot of updates in a month.
However, you have 167 videos to browse at the site. And the more important thing is that you have access to the complete Teen Mega World network, which currently has 4,279 videos covering many niches.
You can join this site directly, or access it through the Teen Mega World network. Either approach costs you $14.95/month, with a PU discount. The site (and the network) gives you, for a low price, a large amount of good-quality videos (and galleries) of attractive teen models enjoying hardcore sex.
This is not a glamour site. You don't get photo shop or fancy costumes or a story-line plot to build the excitement or eroticism: this site (and the network) features what I think of as bread-and-butter hardcore sex. But the models are attractive teens. And the sex can be very hot.
So if you are in the mood for hardcore teen sex, this site (and network) is worth your money.
I am giving the site (combined with network access) a score of 92, because you get a huge amount of professionally shot videos of young teens who are attractive and hot in hardcore sex. For a very low price.
For what it offers, the network is one of the best bargains for teen hardcore sex.
But there are other sites or networks that are also excellent. Such as X-Art, or the Diesel network, that cover the glamour style for hardcore teen porn, at a higher price. And the selection of models at those sites can be incredibly lovely.
So the internet has many possibilities to cover your porn needs. And to fit your budget.
I am not a member of Club MetArt.
I am a member of MetArt.
The preview page for Club MetArt gives very little information.
But what the preview page appears to show includes the 4 galleries for today's update at Club MetArt.
Those 4 galleries are the same 4 galleries for today's update at MetArt.
So I don't understand what the reason is for Club MetArt to exist.
Or why anyone would join the site - because the membership price for Club MetArt is higher than for MetArt, and Club MetArt gives you far less content.
Separately, what is your normal download speed? Just curious to compare it to my download speed.
I know you told me before, but my brain has trouble retaining facts (and ideas).
Just one of the benefits of growing older, I guess.
Still more separately: You state in your review you scored MetArt high.
You gave it a score of 88.
In my last review of MetArt, I gave it a score of 99.
In my first review of MetArt, which was also my first review at PU, I gave it a score of 97.
I've said that, in my opinion, MetArt is the best softcore photo site on the internet.
I paid for a lifetime membership to MetArt. Because I was tired of paying a monthly or yearly fee to join.
But you gave an excellent review of MetArt, and I can certainly understand why you scored it 88. And you were being generous, because, as you explained very clearly, the site contents did not appeal to your tastes. But your review of MetArt was detailed and informative, and clearly spelled out its strengths and weaknesses.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login. No captcha required.
-Can stream and/or download the scenes.
-Multiple definitions for streaming and download: low (for mobile), medium, high, super high (1080p).
-Long time before site timeout due to inactivity.
-Professionally shot videos: good camera-work, good focus, good lighting, good colors, good sound control.
-Models are young Japanese, late teens to early twenties, attractive.
Cons:
-Sex toys are used extensively in the scenes. Both dildos and vibrators (some people say that a dildo can be a vibrator, but that's another topic).
-Squirting is messy (and smelly, I would assume). Clinical studies have shown that the liquid spraying from a girl's pussy is pee.
-This site gives you multiple long shots of the girl's pussy; but after a long time, it gets boring.
-The search needs to be improved. It has a clunky interface, and it gives poor search results when you enter a model's name.
For multiple reasons:
The Squirting Virgin site has easier navigation. You can find the videos of any model much easier.
The Squirting Virgin site videos have more heat and imagination to the sex.
The Squirting Virgin videos have a large element of sadomasochism. As I wrote in my recent Squirting Virgin review, the stunt cock is the master, and the attractive model is his sex toy to be used and abused and pleasured. The guy fucks the model like a pro. Hard and fast and long. So the fantasy element is well-played.
In the Shiofuky site, you don't get the feeling that the guy/guys are masters who are fucking the models harshly. In fact, many of the scenes show little or no fucking. The girls are being pleasured by the dildos and vibrators and fingers, and then they squirt.
I think the harsh fucking which the Squirting Virgin site emphasizes, adds a lot of heat to the scenes, and the Shiofuky scenes are mild by comparison.
The Shiofuky site is more for voyeurs who enjoy watching girls reaching orgasm.
The Squirting Virgin site adds an element of harshness, along the lines of a Pierre Woodman video, where the guy is going to fuck the brains out of the model. The girl's enjoyment is secondary, she gets pleasure because she is being used as nature intended her to be used.
I'm describing the fantasy that the male watcher is supposed to be experiencing. Although some PU members might disagree with my theory or words.
In other words, the Squirting Vigin site emphasizes heat over mildness.
Maybe I'm becoming blase to porn. Because at one time, seeing a girl squirting, by itself, would have seemed a shocking event to me. But now, it's just another porn niche.
The Pierre Woodman videos (Woodman Casting X and Wake Up N Fuck) feature hardcore pussy and ass pounding, intense fingering, forcible cock sucking, a lot of slapping by the stunt cock of the woman's face and breasts and ass cheeks.
The Woodman videos are not squirting videos.
The Squirting Vigin site is similar to the Pierre Woodman videos, with the addition of female squirting.
The Shiofuky site is just squirting videos, with little hardcore pussy or ass pounding. So it's much milder than the Squirting Virgin site, or the Pierre Woodman videos.
The Pierre Woodman sites are expensive compared to Squirting Virgin or Shiofuky. But they are worth the extra money if you enjoy harsh treatment of women with sex.
The Squirting Virgin site features the harsh treatment of women with sex, for a lower price: but that site is small, and it stopped updating years ago. However, the Squirting Virgin site also offers access to the Teen Mega World network, which has a massive amount of hardcore teen videos in different niches.
The Shiofuky site has 336 scenes, but I found them kind of boring. If they were more exciting I would give Shiofuky a higher score. But they also need to improve the search engine, and make a few other improvements to make the site easier to navigate.
Giving Shiofuky a score of 82. That is very subjective. If you find the scenes interesting, the site would score higher.
If you find the videos boring, you could score lower than I did.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Join this site directly, PU discount is $19.95/month.
-But join Teen Mega World directly, PU discount is $14.95/month, and you get full access to Dirty Coach.
-Epoch is payment processor, a trusted name.
-Attractive teen models. White Eastern European girls.
-There is an active comment section, where you can read what other members think of the model, the sex.
-Zip file for each gallery.
-A matching gallery for each video. Good quality photos. The photos are like excellent screen shots. Good focus. Good definition. Don't expect MetArt or MPL Studio quality photos, but these are surprisingly good screen shots of the video.
The gallery gives you not only a fast impression of the what the video will be, but the photos are worth keeping as well, because the models are attractive, and the photos are crisp and well-framed. There must be some software program that does a good job of making these photos from a video, because there were no annoying flash shots during the video shoot.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-Another good feature is the software used to display each gallery. You can easily view each image, and enlarge it if wanted.
-The site owners have spent a lot of time and money making improvements to the network, trying to make it easy to use.
-Good download speeds. I averaged 3-4 MB/s.
CONS:
-Pre-checked cross sale to VideosZ on join page, which renews at $39.97/month after 2 day trial.
-Or you can join VideosZ for $17.95/month with PU discount.
-Small site. Only 56 videos.
-Last update was in 2014.
-The basic plot is thin. A guy is training a girl. He puts his hands on her, she is attracted to him, and they have sex.
Very little build-up or eroticism. This is the Russian equivalent of foreplay: a guy presses his hard-on against a girl, and she is so turned on, that she gives him a blow job, and then they fuck.
Why didn't I get to watch these videos in high school, so that I would have learned the basic techniques of how to seduce Russian girls?
Bottom Line:
Site theme: a male coach or trainer seduces a girl he is coaching.
There is almost no plot. The girl is ready to fuck. So the guy does what guys do, and fucks her strongly.
I don't want to sound like a broken record, but I find the girls at this site (and Teen Mega World network) attractive to very attractive. They are almost all white, slender teens who enthusiastically enjoy sex.
The site (and network) is easy to use. They've put a lot of time into making the navigation easy. And over time they have built a massive collection for the network of good quality hardcore teen videos. If you go back several years, the quality goes down, of course. But for the last few years, the quality is very good for basic hardcore teenage sex. This is not a glamcore site or network. The stories are basic to non-existent. So there is very little build-up to the sex, not much eroticism. It's strictly bread-and-butter fucking (in most positions, with toys or without toys, usually with female cocksucking as well).
Dirty Coach site is small, but you get access to the Teen Mega World network, which is huge.
To the best of my knowledge, the content at Dirty Coach is exclusive. Scenes from other sites in the network are not necessarily exclusive, and I know I've seen some of them at Diesel network and Team Skeet and at 18X Girls. But I believe the material was first posted to Teen Mega World.
Based on a low price for a huge amount of good quality videos and photo sets at the network, of hardcore teen sex, I am giving the site a score of 92. Because membership at the site gives access to the Teen Mega World network.
However, please remember that you save $5/month if you join Teen Mega World directly, instead of joining Dirty Coach directly.
Excellent review.
Interesting read that gives the flavor and essentials for the site.
Completely agree that Reiley Reed and Alex Grey are stunning models, who are seriously hot in their sex scenes.
I'm not a member of this site, but I've seen plenty of videos of them at other sites.
I don't know why the file sizes are so big. They should have a better encoding, where the file size won't take up so much space.
A maximum of five downloads per month seems like a deal-breaker to me.
The truth is, I download a lot of scenes from different sites that I am a member of, but hardly ever watch my downloaded videos.
So I don't know why I think that downloading is so important.
But I guess I am a packrat, who like to collect videos and galleries.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-668 scenes (and matching photo sets). This is a large site.
-A large number of very attractive models. Sheri Vi, Shelby, Kamila, Caroline, Milana Fox, and so many other lovelies you want to bounce on for yourself.
-PU discounted price of $14.95/month.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Excellent download speeds. I average 2 to 3 MB/sec.
-Download managers work.
-Scenes with most variations of girls with boys: 1 girl-1 boy; 1 girl-2 boys; 2 girls-2 boys; 3 girls-1 boy.
-Multiple choice of definition to download the video.
-Zip file for the matching photo set for each scene.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor.
-If you think slender white teens are attractive, this site is for you. But if you want greater variety in the models, or don't enjoy slender white teens having sex, this site is not for you. It's a matter of personal taste. I think most of the models at the site are attractive to very attractive. Some of the models are great looking to lovely. This is not a glamcore site, so the models are not presented at their most attractive, but their youth, freshness, and general physical appeal are undeniable.
-There's almost no plot in the scenes. It's basically teens fucking. There's very little romance or tease or eroticism. X-Art is glamcore. That site tries to present fucking with glamor. Teen Sex Movie is bread-and-butter sex. Very little glamor, but a lot of fucking.
Bottom Line:
The site is an excellent value for hardcore teen sex.
You get 668 scenes (and matching photo sets) for $14.95/month.
You also get access to the rest of the Teen Mega World network, which means access to over 4,000 scenes.
-I've read some comments by people who don't enjoy this site. They complain that the models are too thin. That the models are poor performers, who don't give a convincing performance that the sex is real. The models are not professional actors. The models are young teenage girls who are fucking, giving blowjobs, whatever. This is porn.
-The James Bond movies, and most movies, are fiction. It's not real. You want to criticize the movies as fiction, go ahead. Porn is fiction. It's meant to be enjoyed. A lot of the value of the porn comes from the audience. If you want great acting, don't bother watching most porn.
-Personally, I think the slender white Eastern European models at Teen Sex Movies (and the Teen Mega World network Teen Sex Movies is part of) are mainly attractive to very attractive. The scenes are professionally shot: good camera work, good lighting, good sound control. The scripts are basic or meaningless. You are watching young people having sex. If you like watching this, the site is excellent. You get a fantastic amount of scenes (over 4,000 scenes in the network) for a very low price.
But if you want glamcore, or some other type of porn, look elsewhere.
Giving the site a score of 92. Could they improve the site? Certainly. If they would send over to my house some of the best-looking models, I would increase the score to 95. Maybe even 99.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
