If you paid for a trial membership to MYGF and you got no privileges for your membership, I would assume you should be able to get a refund from your credit card.
If you can neither view nor download any videos or photos, I mean.
But at least you posted a useful warning to PU members.
Personally, I try to avoid all trial memberships, because you never know in advance how limited they are. And trial memberships normally convert into high priced memberships at the end of the trial, unless you cancel them.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $14.95/month.
-Features teen angels from heaven who came to Earth to show us humans the joys of sex. These are heavenly young girls with lean white bodies that are the answer to every horny male's prayer.
-The models are young teens, without a lot of makeup. But they mainly attractive young teens. Young, fresh, with nice to very attractive
faces and healthy young bodies. They don't look like sluts, but are attractive young teens you might see in a mall or shopping square.
-The site started in early 2013. All the videos have a definition choice of:
405p(for portable devices); 540p; 720p; 1080p.
-The videos and galleries are professionally shot. Good lighting, good sound control, good camera-work. Little or no airbrushing.
-Download managers allowed. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
-Zip file for galleries.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Slow, irregular update rate. You only get 1 site update every 2-4 weeks or less often. However, the network averages 1 update per day.
-Some scenes only have a video or a gallery (a photo gallery), instead of a video plus matching gallery. I suspect they bought the video or gallery, and didn't have the money to buy the matching video or gallery from the producer/owner.
I'm guessing they have maybe 100 videos, maybe 100 galleries. I'm too lazy to click through the entire site to count. Which could easily take 45 minutes or more, and that's assuming all the links are exposed and active.
-Videos download with a generic numeric filename. Instead, the filename should include: NameOfModel-DatePosted-SitePosted-DefinitionChosen.
-Variable download speeds. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec, depending on time of day and whatever other factors might be controlling the download speeds.
Bottom Line:
-Site theme: My favorite Angels from Heaven, coming to Earth to satisfy our human lusts. Except they landed in Russia, instead of coming to California. Which was a big mistake. But I am willing to overlook God's mistakes, and still give the site (and network) an outstanding score, because I am really an Angel myself. (Joke)
The site (and network) is easy to use.
In spite of the massive amount of content (over 4,000 videos and photosets), it's fairly easy to search through the model listing, which has nice-sized thumbnails that give you a good idea of what the girls look like. The fact that you
have access to over 1,200 models in the network can make the search tiring, but the fact that so many of these girls are attractive to lovely makes the search worthwhile. If the models were sluts, or unattractive, the network would have little value, but these girls are good-looking to really outstanding.
-The cons are basically minor. This is a very nice site, and you get access to the entire Teen Mega World network, which makes this an outstanding value for your money. This is assuming you enjoy watching hardcore teen videos of attractive young girls. This is not a glamcore/heartcore site, it's mainly a bread-and-butter teen hardcore site, but the girls are
very attractive, and the network (Teen Mega World) gives you access to over 4,000 videos and galleries in a variety of teen niches for a very low price.
Some members might complain that the scenes are repetitious, that there should be a plot or story to the video to give the sex added meaning, that the models should be made to appear more attractive (with better costumes, make-up, more expensive settings, etc.). But this is basically, as I keep saying, a bread-and-butter teen hardcore network, that somehow built up
a massive collection of attractive young girls who are having sex. That's human nature: we always want more than what we are getting.
I am giving the site (but mainly the network) a score of 92. If the site were a stand-alone site, the score would be much lower. But it's not a stand-alone site, it's part of a network, and you gain access to the entire network with membership
in any one of its sites, for a very low price.
I've never been a member of MetArtX, and don't plan on being one any time soon.
I've been a member of MetArt for many years, on the monthly, yearly and finally a lifetime subscription.
MetArtX is a newish site, and I would suspect that you would get a lot more content from one of the other sites in the MA network that features harder content than what MA features.
Actually, since you are a MA member already, I suggest you log in to the MA site itself.
Once you log in, I assume you will see the "free access" advertisement, that gives you access to one or more of the MA sites as a trial offer.
I am doing that right now, and I am being offered 2 free days to three sites:
MetArtX Viv Thomas
Love Hairy
So I assume you should have the same opportunity to explore MetArtX for free for 2 days.
If you don't see that offer when logging in, I suggest you send an email to MetArt support, asking if they will give you 2 free days to MetArtX to sample their wares.
I see no reason they would deny this request.
And maybe you can post your experience with MetArtX in a comment at PU: whether you liked what you found.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $19.95/month.
-Join instead with PU discount of $14.95/month through Teen Mega World (which gives complete access to 18 First Sex).
-Part of Teen Mega World network, one of my favorite teen hardcore sites.
-No download limits.
-Good download speeds. I average 3-4 MB/sec, which is close to my download limit.
-Download managers accepted.
-Exclusive videos at this site, to best of my knowledge.
Cons:
-There are cons. As with any site. But you should understand the cons in relation to what the site has to offer, in comparison to the low priced membership.
-Many sites do not update, or update only rarely. 18 First Sex has not updated since 2010.
-Small number of videos at this site. Only 51. But you get access to all of Teen Mega World sites.
-The definition of the videos are from years ago. Would be great if they could re-master the videos to today's standards. But probably not cost-effective.
Bottom Line:
I'm giving the site statistics for Teen Mega World, not the site statistics for 18 First Sex:
4,200+ videos.
700,000+ photos.
1,100+ models.
Updates daily.
6,800+ GB content.
Site theme is young girls new to sex.
The Best Porn site gives 18 First Sex a score of 64.5.
I think that's slightly harsh.
18 First Sex is part of the Teen Mega World network.
So joining 18 First Sex gives you access to the entire Teen Mega World network, and vice versa (joining Teen Mega World network gives you access to 18 First Sex).
So access to Teen Mega World is worth a score of 90 or higher, since it's one of my favorite teen hardcore sites.
Along with Diesel network, and X-Art, you get a lot of bang for your buck at any one of those three sites/networks.
To review or score 18 First Sex as a stand-alone site does not recognize that it's part of the Teen Mega World network.
You get access to all of Teen Mega World network sites by joining any one of the sites.
So, it's better to think of the Teen Mega World network as whole.
Many years ago, when you joined one of the Teen Mega World network sites, it was a different experience. You did not know beforehand what sites in the network you would have access to. You would gain access to most of the network sites, but not all of them, and the sites you would have access to depended on what site you joined through. And there was no easy way to
tell beforehand, what sites you would gain access to.
Then, Teen Mega World changed its policy, and granted access to all the network sites when you joined any of its sites.
Which was a big advantage, and a simplification. Because I (and other PU members) had been asking the webmaster to list the specific sites you get access to by joining which specific sites.
Over time (over the years), Teen Mega World has made definite improvements to the network, making it much easier to use.
Improving navigation so you don't have to re-log-in to each individual site with a username and password when you want to switch sites. And making the model indexes easier to use with more complete thumbnails and hot links. Adding higher
definition video files, and better, more professional gallery photos. And adding more sites that cater to different niches.
One problem with having so many different sites in a network: many or most of the sites either don't update, or update only infrequently. This is an economic issue, because there is no way a network with 30 sites can afford to update all of their sites. So this draws a lot of criticism because members want all the sites to update, or just want more updates in general.
18 First Sex site:
The first video was added 2010-05-01.
The last video was added 2010-08-05.
The site only has 51 videos (and 51 matching galleries).
So they only posted videos to the site for about 3 months. That was in 2010. And no videos have been added since.So a lot of people wonder why the site exists, or complain that the site is not being updated.
You need to understand their business model, why they are opening a site, and then no longer updating it: it's a marketing decision. To have more sites that cater to different niches, to appeal to a wider audience. And there's no economic way the network can afford to update all their sites. They would go broke fast. So the fact that a lot of sites do not update generates criticism.
If you understand their business model, that might help to reduce your criticism of the site and network. Or not.
If you have an elevated expectation, that often reduces your enjoyment of a product. That's human nature.
But I think it's reasonable to score 18 First Sex as a part of Teen Mega World network, instead of as a stand-alone site.
If it were a stand-alone site, it might deserve the score of 64.5 that The Best Porn gives it.
But as a site with access to the entire Teen Mega World network, I believe a more fitting score is 92. As long as you understand that I am giving that score to the network. And that any criticisms of the network, while understandable,
should compare the site value versus the membership price, which I believe supports a score in the 90s, because you get a lot of value for your money.
Edit01: Personally, even though the site only has 51 videos, I think many of them are worth watching. Don't expect masterpiece sex videos. But you can find videos of attractive teen girls exploring sex. I compare these videos with most
videos from Naughty America, and even though both networks are hardcore sites, the videos at Teen Mega World are so much more enjoyable or watchable.
I realize I should give more details to back up my opinion, to make it more understandable, but I think of the videos at Naughty America as low-grade porn. And the videos at Teen Mega World as higher grade porn. Based mainly on the
attractiveness of the models.
This is not a glamcore network. But the average level of attractiveness of the models is outstanding.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount $9.95 first month (recurs at $24.95/mo).
-The female porn star's name is given for each video.
-The posting date is given for each video.
-The galleries are low quality screen caps, not photoshopped or glamorized. So you can see what the models look like without makeup or fancy costumes. A dose of reality TV. If you like your sex raw.
-All videos have a clip option where you can download parts of the entire video.
-There is a rating system for the videos. But many videos have a high rating, which is suspect. Why give a video a rating of 8 or 8.5, when the model has below-average looks, and the video is like a porn flick from the 1970s when you got a visual of crude sex?
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Not all videos have a streaming option. The earliest videos have to be downloaded and then watched on your PC.
-There is no zip file for the earliest galleries.
-But the earliest galleries are low quality screencaps, so who would want to save them anyway?
-Early videos only have a WMV or MPEG file option to download. No higher quality definition to download.
-Female porn stars have below-average attractiveness.
-Even when you have a model who is naturally pretty, there is no effort made to make her look attractive.
Jassie (AKA Jassie James) is a naturally pretty, young-looking girl--but in her scene at Naughty America she does not appear to be attractive.
This is a girl who has 24 galleries at MetArt, under the name of Jassie A, as well as galleries at ddgirls and digitaldesire.
-Download speeds varies. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec, which is below average for my connection.
-Quality of the older videos is poor.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: naughty schoolgirls having sex.
Site statistics: 514 videos + matching galleries.
I much prefer the models at Teen Mega World, Diesel network, X-Art, or almost any other hardcore or heartcore site, because the models at other sites are much more attractive. Even the models at Rocco Siffredi and the Devils Film network (which includes Peter North, Rocco Siffredi, Silvia Saint and Silverstone DVD) are presented more attractively, even though the sex is often raw and crude.
I don't know why, I just think that Naughty Bookworms is bottom of the barrel sex. But that's a personal observation. Many other people think the videos at Naughty Books are just fine.
Giving the site a score of 78. Because it has a hugh amount of content. For a low introductory price.
You should cancel the trial subscription immediately, before it converts to the $40/month fee.
I'm guessing that the sign-up page you were directed to was for a trial offer.
So in spite of un-checking the pre-checked cross-sale to some site, you were still agreeing to a trial offer to 21Sextury.
I doubt that Epoch will be able to refund your $3 trial membership fee (or whatever it was).
Epoch is a professional organization with a fine reputation. But paysites love to hold on to trial membership fees.
If you let the 3-day trial membership convert to the $40/month membership, you can probably kiss the $40 good-bye.
So contact Epoch immediately, to cancel your membership.
Cancelling through Epoch is easy. And they should send you a confirming email of that cancellation (which is done automatically).
Contact your credit card company and tell them your story.
That you cancelled the service and are still being billed.
The credit card company should refund the amount you were last charged.
Thanks for the positive words.
I was afraid I was letting my personal bias flavor the review too much.
But the site criticism is justified: why have a site with only 8 videos?
Unless those videos are truly exceptional, which these are not.
One of the problems of getting older is that people start to die.
Many of the models that were Playboy centerfolds have died, from different causes.
A lot of them were very attractive women.
So you have to accept that death is part of life. And that as you get older, it will one day happen to you.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $24.95/month for this site.
Join Naughty Amnerica for $9.95 for the first month, and you get full access to this site.
-Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name. Easy to cancel, easy to work with.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Can choose between multiple definitions for download.
-Choice of multiple definitions for download of full movie.
-Choice of multiple definitions for download of specific clips from each movie.
-Each video has an accompanying photoset that illustrates the action of the video.
-Zip file for each gallery.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-I don't find the models attractive. That's personal taste. I don't like fake boobs. Don't like tattoos. The models are below average in looks. They aren't cute or pretty or lovely--unlike many porn models at glamor sites or hardcore sites like Teen Mega World or Diesel network.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
8 videos.
8 matching galleries.
Lesbian Girl on Girl is one of my favorite sites on Naughty America.
The site has 8 videos and 8 matching photo sets. That's it.
The first video has a posting date of 2012-12-12.
The last video has a posting date of 2013-01-15.
The reason it is my favorite site at Naughty America is that it gives me faith that I can open up my own porn site.
And maybe make a lot of money.
If Naughty America can offer a site with only 8 videos (and matching photo sets), there nothing to stop me from doing it as well.
To open my site, I would be willing to buy 10 videos, which is two more than what Lesbian Girl on Girl boasts.
Edit: some of my remarks are meant as tongue in cheek.
Why have a site with only 8 videos? The owners probably thought it would be a useful site to offer some content in this niche. So they opened the site, and posted 8 videos. And stopped posting new videos within the first month.
So, why keep it as a separate site? The main reason would be to advertise that Naughty America has one additional site to offer customers. And you don't find out that this site is so tiny until after you sign up.
As far the videos are concerned:
I actually prefer these videos over some of the other niches that Naughty America features.
The reason is the story or plot is minimal. So there is less of the bad acting these models do in leading up to the sex.
The sex itself is not very believable. These are porn stars getting paid to act sexy, make a lot of fake moaning noises to show how aroused they are. The acting is not convincing, the sex is not hot. Some lesbian porn can be hot, but none of the videos at this site are very interesting. They are basically a waste of time to watch.
This is personal opinion, but I don't find most of the models at Lesbian Girl on Girl (or Naughty America) that attractive. I don't like fake boobs. I don't like tattoos on women.
Bottom line: Even if you like lesbian porn, I doubt this site will have much value, because it's so tiny. And the videos are plain vanilla. They have no heat. No interest.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price.
PU lists discounted price of $24.95/month (recurring) for My Dad's Hot Girlfriend.
Join through Naughty America instead of through My Dad's Hot Girlfriend, and save $15.
-Multiple definition choices to download a video:
For the full movie: 4k, 1080p, 720p, 480p.
For specific clips of the movie: Quicktime (Apple), DVD, Normal, Mobile.
-Can stream videos on Roku on your TV.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Epoch is the billing agent. A trusted name.
-The site (and network) offers a guarantee: if you are not completely satisfied for any reason within 30 days of purchasing a membership, contact customer service and they will refund your membership price.
I purchased a membership. I don't like their videos. But that is personal preference. The videos are professionally shot. With a lot of big-name porn stars. With high production values. So I think it would be wrong for me to ask for a refund. The site offers a lot of value for people who like their videos.
Cons:
-Navigation could be much simpler.
-Too many ads on each page.
-Very large files for the video downloads.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Site has 315 videos.
Site has 315 matching galleries.
Starting around October 2013, the site offers 4k definition for some videos.
Starting in late December 2013, all the videos from that date on are offered in 4k definition.
My Dad's Hot Girlfriend theme is about guys making it with their dads' hot girlfriends.
So I guess the fantasy is that you are getting revenge on your dad for whatever he did to you in the past.
Showing him that you are a bigger man than he is.
With the added bonus that this is behind his back, the more fool him.
If that fantasy rocks your boat, then this site was made for you.
Otherwise, it's just a lame premise.
However, not all the videos feature a woman playing the girlfriend of a man who fucks the son.
Some of the videos have the woman playing the wife of the man.
So--depending on the audience, that might be a con, because it breaks the theme of site.
These are porn actors. So don't expect Academy award performances. The script is usually lame, the dialog is lame, the plot is lame, the actors are lame.
As I mentioned in my review of Naughty America, it helps to drink a few beers (or some hard liquor) before watching these videos, to help suspend your disbelief. That way you are more free to enjoy these stupid videos.
Personally, I think the videos at most other porn sites are easier to enjoy. The many other sites give you straight porn videos, whether it's gonzo sex or glamcore sex or some other variation. But I have a hard time watching the My Dad's Hot Girlfriend videos and getting in the mood to appreciate what I'm watching.
The site offers multiple download options:
For the full movie: 4k, 1080p, 720p, 480p.
For clips of the movie: Quicktime (Apple), DVD, Normal, Mobile.
Some PU members have reported problems downloading files from Naughty America. They say that downloading a file can crash their computer, or that the download speed is extremely slow.
From most porn paysites other than Naughty America, I can often get 3-5 MB/sec.
At Naughty America, I average around 1-2 MB/sec download speeds.
That is far faster than what other PU members report.
There was a recent comment (dated 2016-05-22) by PU member Divinx on Naughty America that reports "Downloads below 50 KB/s. Nobody does it worse."
If that is what I experienced, I would ask for a refund. Because the file sizes of a video are so large, that it would make downloading a video extremely difficult.
For example, a single video, runtime 29 minutes 39 seconds, 720p definition, has a file size of 1.11 GB.
That is a huge file size for a single video of that definition and runtime.
The file size for the 1080p definition of the same file would be 2.57 GB. So even at today's prices, you would quickly run out of storage space if you want to archive many of these videos.
The only way that someone can store these videos is because hard drive storage prices keep dropping. 5 or 10 years ago, it would have been far too expensive to buy the drives to store many of these videos.
Even at today's prices, you really should use some program to compress the files, if you want to store them on a personal hard drive.
When I report the specifications for my download speeds, I should note that I am not downloading more than one file at a time. Also, I am not streaming any videos while I am downloading.
On a simple basis, I can report that if I am streaming a video and downloading a video at the same time, the video I am streaming can exhibit playback problems: the video can stutter during playback. And the download speeds will drop. So the fact that I am not downloading multiple files at the same time, and not streaming at the same time I am downloading, might help to explain why I am getting faster download speeds than some people report.
But I do get slower download speeds at Naughty America, and its sites, than I get from other paysites. Most other paysites will give me a download speed of 4-5 MB/sec.
Theodore Sturgeon (the science fiction author and critc) wrote Sturgeon's Revelation (commonly referred to as Sturgeon's Law): 90% of SF is crap. But he also said that applies to most other fields: 90% of film, literature, consumer goods, etc. is crap.
In my opinion, 100% of My Dad's Hot Girlfriend is crap.
Naughty America is a low-priced network. It has a low membership price of $9.95 for the first month with a PU discount. And you can sometimes find special offers with an even lower introductory price.
Is it worth joining the network?
Even at that low price point, unless you like the videos offered, it is not worth joining.
But if you do like the videos, then it's a worthwhile join. Unless you experience the problems that other people have reported.
Thanks for your clear and intelligent reply.
I was afraid that my review was misleading. That is didn't show clearly the pros and cons of the site.
And I have doubts about the value or validity of a site score.
How the score should be used.
I've read most of your site reviews in the past.
And while I don't agree 100% with all the ideas and scores expressed, I think they are useful to help choosing which sites to join.
What I like most is that your ideas and viewpoint are fresh to me.
I feel like I've got into a rut in my reviews.
I am not trying to sell you on the site.
You look at my score of 90, and think that is a site recommendation.
It's not.
The score of 90 means that, if you personally enjoy the type of videos they offer, then you are getting a large amount of
professionally shot videos for a low price. Which would be good value for your money.
Except: If you experience the download problems that you experienced, that would reduce the value of the site.
Also, the large file sizes reduces the value.
Also, if the overpowering ads make the site harder to use, that is negative value.
I was trying to be honest and fair in my review. But it's really misleading to think that a score implies how much an
individual will enjoy a site. Personal preference is far more important in how each individual will enjoy a particular
site. But I think that if you enjoy the type of content that Naughty America does provide, it's deserves a high score--because the negatives that I experienced are less important than what the site has to offer.
I don't enjoy the site. It was a mistake for me to join-in spite of the low membership price. But again, that is based on my personal preference. Which should not be the controlling factor in rating the site. The rating or score should try to indicate how much a site is worth, versus what you are paying for access. It can get complicated trying to come up with a fair value of the site's score. But that would be a topic for another day.
I thought my review has value. It's not entirely comprehensive, but I think it tries to be an honest opinion of my thoughts.
I've read your review of the site.
I don't think anything has changed since you did your review.
I did list some cons or negative factors about the network:
1. The overpowering presence of ads on every page.
2. The over-large file sizes for videos.
3. Slow download speeds.
I gave the network a score of 90 based on the following:
Huge amount of content.
Professionally shot videos.
Wide range of niches.
Access to 4K videos.
Access to virtual reality porn.
If you joined the network, I doubt that you would enjoy the network any more than you did in your previous experience.
But---
I did not experience any PC problems while downloading files.
I did experience slow download speeds, but probably not as bad as what you experienced.
If you didn't enjoy most of the sex scenes before, there's no reason I can think of why you would appreciate them more today.
I thought I made it pretty clear in my review that I did not enjoy the network. But I believe that many people would appreciate the site/network for what it has to offer. And that was the controlling factor on why I gave the network a high score.
I mentioned that if I had remembered joining the site before, I would not have re-joined recently. But that is personal preference. I don't enjoy most of their videos.
I'm not a person who understands the finer points of photography.
I look at photos and videos on a low-priced laptop.
Even if I had high-end monitors and expensivwe computers, I don't know if my eyes would notice a measurable difference from what I'm seeing today--because of advancing age, etc.
I respect the people who can appreciate the higher qualities of photos or videos, but it's not my thing. I'm not trying to be rude or disrespectful. I'm just stating that experience (to be able to view and enjoy artwork at a higher level) is beyond me.
Open a browser window.
Paste into the address bar the following: metartx.com/
This brings up a metartx page for visitors.
The page has thumbnails of this week's videos and photo sets.
However, if you click on any of the thumbnails, instead of getting a short video or sample gallery, you are re-directed to the Metartx signup page.
My guess is that the visitor page is very elementary, and just has the introductory page with a few thumbnails, that leads to the join page.
Maybe in the future they will expand the visitor page with actual sample videos and sample galleries.
But unless one of the Metart staff lists the content statistics of Metartx in a reply on the comments section or blog, I don't know how you will determine what the contents of Metartx are.
And since the join prices of Metartx are very high, I think it will be expensive to join, without having a clear idea of what you are paying for.
MetArtX features models in masturbation photosets and videos. So it's a little harder than MetArt. But many of the models should be familiar from the MetArt site.
Since it's a new site, the membership fees should be smaller than a membership to one of MetArt's older sites which have larger content. But apparently they are charging the same - or more - than what you would pay with a PU discount for the older sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-$9.99/month membership fee with PU discount. Very cheap price.
-Ccbill is the billing agent. A trusted name.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Goddess Nudes is part of the MetArt network. The customer service at MetArt network is outstanding. If you have any problems, send an email to customer service, and they will probably respond in a few hours. I've never joined any site or network that had a better or more responsive Customer Service department. The truth is, the customer service at many paysites is either non-responsive or non-existent.
-Fast download speeds. I get 4-5 MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download speed.
-Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor, if you know what the site is.
-No videos.
-Site navigation could be improved.
-After Goddess Nudes became part of MetArt network, they included a txt file to the zip file for a gallery that includes the physical characteristics of the model. But they could also include a short bio on the model, which is what they do at MetArt. And since many of the models at Goddess Nudes are also at MetArt.com or other sites in the MetArt network, that should take very little work to do.
Bottom Line:
Domai was started around 1997. Goddess Nudes was started in 2010. Both were started by Eolake Stobblehouse. Stobblehouse said he appreciated looking at beautiful women, and he wanted to share this pleasure with others. He started Domai as a hobby, and only later started selling memberships. So it became a business. He wanted to proselytize that nudity is not sinful. That beauty is to be enjoyed. That life is to be enjoyed. He argued that tasteful, nude art is not porn, but art. Domai (and later Goddess Nudes) focused on innocent nudes of attractive young women. Both sites became owned by the MetArt network in 2014, after Eolake Stobblehouse became ill and could no longer operate them.
Domai and Goddess Nudes are similar sites:
-they both feature young women (late teens, early twenties) in nude, tasteful poses (extreme softcore) in a variety of natural settings.
-As the older site, Domai has the larger backlog of galleries and models. But Goddess Nudes has a large amount of content as well:
Both sites are photos only. No videos.
Both sites feature simple, natural photos shot by a variety of professional photographers,
Both sites advertise exclusive content.
Both sites are softcore only. Goddess Nudes is supposed to be more explicit, but it's still strictly softcore.
The navigation (and site layout) for both sites is similar.
Both sites update with one photo set per day on weekdays.
Both sites have the photosets categorized by the year posted.
Both sites have the models and photosets categorized by the contributing photographer.
Both sites also have thumbnails of the models in a downside listing in a row of thumbnails. Which takes a long while to click through.
Both sites share many of the models and contributing photographers.
Neither site has a search engine to find models by categories or traits. You can put the name of a model into a basic search engine, and that will return the model, but then you have to click to find her galleries.
So what are the major differences between the two site?
One: Domai has more content than Goddess Nudes.
Two: The content at each site is exclusive to that site.
Three: Goddess Nudes is supposed to be more explicit than Domai, but they are both softcore photo sites.
So why choose one site over the other?
The simple answer is: If you like Domai, you will almost certainly like Goddess Nudes.
So, join Domai first, because it has more content.
Then, assuming you liked Domai, join Goddess Nudes, because you will get access to the same type of content, but with material that will be new to you.
I'm giving Goddess Nudes a score of 85. Based on:
The attractive models.
The photography that is professional, simple and natural.
The low membership price of $9.99/month.
Do not join either site if you want videos. Neither site has them.
Do not join either site if you want more than extremely softcore photos of attractive women.
Do not join either site if you want the models made to look glamourous or exotic. These are lovely young women who are photographed in simple settings, without a lot of artifice.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount $9.95 for 1 month, recurs at $24.95/monthly
-Membership includes over 30 porn sites.
-Over 4,000 scenes.
-Epoch is billing agent. A trusted name.
-Can download videos in different definitions: 480p, 720p, 1080p, (some are 4K).
-Can also chose the file format for download: Quicktime (Apple), Windows format, Mobile.
-Can download the full video, or selected clips from the movie.
-Can stream the movie in 720p or 4K.
-Zip file for each gallery
-Photos can be viewed in a slideshow
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded.
-The streaming option has low, medium and high definition.
-The download option has multiple choices for definition: mobile, medium, high, (and for some videos, ultra high).
-You can download the entire video, or choose which clips you want from that video.
Cons:
-Ads, ads, and more ads.
I don't remember any site or network that had so many ads.
-Have to remember, that when a thumbnail shows a scene, with the caption "Unlock", that is another ad. If you click on the unlock or the thumbnail, you are charged for that scene, or a membership fee to whatever site it connects to.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-File sizes are large. For a video with runtime of 37 min 23 sec, downloading in 1080p, the size is 3.25 GB.
-Slow download speeds. I get between 1-2 MB/sec. At many other sites I get 4-5 MB/sec.
Bottom Line:
This is a mega network, with over 30 sites.
7610 Porn Videos,
2650 Porn Stars,
Updated Daily. Unlike many sites that advertise frequent updates and have stopped updating, this network does update each day, with a new video and a photo set.
Low membership price: $9.95 for first month. Recurs at $24.95/month.
If you like to sip a few beers or some harder alcohol, kick off your shoes and watch hardcore porn of women doing nasty things, this network is right up your alley.
The network advertises:
Big tits, big asses, big tattoos, big name stars.
None of those hits my buttons. But the network is popular. Is it worth investing $10 dollars for a month's entertainment?
Yes, if you enjoy this type of porn. And if you are willing to search through the huge amount of content to find what might appeal to your tastes.
I dimly remember being a member of Naughty America before, and wonder why I rejoined. This is not my kind of site. I like attractive teens.
Actually, I do know why I rejoined. I was attracted by the cheap join price, and forgot that I didn't enjoy the network.
But--forget me and my personal likes. This network is more than worth the price if you enjoy their content.
They cover most niches. They have a wide variety of models, of race, age, body type, etc.
They cover a wide variety of fantasies:
The network offers live sex shows with famous porn stars.
The network offers virtual reality porn.
And it has 4K videos (the Ultra High Definition videos).
The videos are professionally shot: excellent camera-work, good lighting, good set design, good sound control,
The network is easy to navigate, once you learn to ignore the overpowering ads that are everywhere.
The site and network theme is girls/women being naughty. Behaving like sluts. Having hardcore sex. Raw and raunchy.
There's not a lot of eroticism or tenderness or affection. There is an attempt to add a story to the sex, but the story is not believable or realistic. But with a few beers, the story or setup might seem amusing.
I'm giving the network a score of 90. Because it's a mega site, with 7610 videos that are professionally shot. 2650 porn stars. They also offer Ultra High Definition videos. And virtual reality porn. And cam shows. This is one of the
leading networks for hard core porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-$9.95/month PU discount.
-Update rate: 1 photoset per day Monday through Friday.
-Ccbill is payment processor. A trusted name.
-There was no pre-checked cross-sell on sign-up page, when I joined.
-Excellent download speeds. I get 4-5 MB/sec, which is close to my maximum download speed.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Large collection of attractive girls, in simple settings.
-Zip file downloads with a file name that shows:
Site name - Date posted - Photoset title - Model name - Photographer name - file definition.
Cons:
Cons are basically minor. But slightly annoying.
-I keep getting logged out of the site. I get a page telling me "Access the full set of 60 photos by joining today!"
I am already a member. How many times do I have to join--before they remember that I already paid?
I have cookies enabled. I don't have this problem with MetArt, The Life Erotic, or Erotic Beauty.
-Once Domai became of part of MetArt, they added a text file to the zip download, that shows the models physical statistics:
Age when shot: Eye color: Hair color: Height: Weight:
But there is no personal history for the model. Which might make a connection in the audience mind to the model. Her hobbies, profession, likes and dislikes, etc.
Note: The zip files of model galleries posted before Domai became part of MetArt, and for a short while after, the text file only includes the name of the model, with no other information.
-No videos. Photo sets only.
-Navigation is basic. It could be improved a lot.
Bottom Line:
I did a review of Domai for PU on 2008-11-17. So it's been almost 8 years since my first review of this site.
Has anything changed for the site since then?
I've gotten 8 years older.
(Joke)
Domai was started by Eolake Stobblehouse in 1997. It was one of the first softcore sites. It contained nude pictures of attractive women, with stories and articles about nudity, beauty, and culture. It promoted the simple enjoyment of life's pleasures, and the enjoyment of nude photography of women.
Stobblehouse became ill, and he sold Domai (and Goddess Nudes) to the MetArt network in 2014. He stated that he could not continue to run the sites because of his illness, but that he believed MetArt would continue to operate the sites in the same manner and style he had done.
Basically, that has been the case.
The membership price has gone up over the years, and MetArt dropped the membership loyalty discounts that Stobblehouse offered. But that is to be expected.
The monthly membership price for Domain is $9.99/month (recurring).
Domai offers a simple, natural approach to female nudity. It is softcore. Mainly solo female sets, but there are some sets of two girls together. But the two girls are not engaged in any sexual activity. And the solo sets are strictly softcore.
No female masturbation or explicit poses. The models are photographed in a wide variety of settings: in a house, at the beach or lake, in a park or woods, in an artist's studio.
The style of the photos is very simple, very natural. The models are not heavily made up, they are not glamorized. They don't wear exotic costumes.
The models are attractive to very attractive young women, in their late teens or early twenties. Mostly white. Mostly natural. I haven't found a single model who has an obvious boob job. Most of the models are tattoo-free. Not a lot of
piercing.
So the models would fit the girl-next-door description, except they are uniformly attractive to extremely attractive.
A better description of the site models would be the prettiest girls in high school or college.
Except they are nude.
And I haven't visited any nude high schools or colleges that I can recall.
(Another joke)
Domai has a cam site, domaicams, that is basically the same type of cam site offered by many porn sites.
You can watch the free cam portions, where the girls basically do nothing of interest, or you can pay for the private shows. The private shows can be expensive. Even the "free" part of the shows encourage tipping the models.
I haven't bothered to join any of the private shows. From what I've read, it can be cheaper to go to a live strip club or nudie bar and watch live girls, instead paying for cam shows. Cam shows are not a habit I want to support, because it can get expensive in a short time.
Years ago, MetArt had cam shows, that were basically free. You could tip the models, but the shows were like 30 minutes or an hour, and the girls were friendly, and attractive, there might be nudity or not, but it was far different from today's cam shows that are designed to get as much money from the viewers as possible.
The MetArt shows from years ago were designed to offer a free experience of the MetArt girls on cam. It was a simpler, less greedy mind-set that seems quaint. You could also pay for a private show in the old MetArt cam, but I never did.
The public cam shows were popular, and watched by a large number of MetArt members per session.
The photo sets are exclusive to this site. I've only seen 1 Domai photoset of a model that was later posted at a different pay site. Alinda had 1 photoset at Domai, and an expanded version of the photoset was posted at Amour Angels under the name of Alina. But that photo set is no longer posted at Domai. Although it's still posted at Amour Angels.
-Navigation is based on the structure that Eolake Stobblehouse had for many years. If they re-
designed the site to follow the Met-Art.com structure, the site navigation would be simpler and faster, and the search engine would be improved.
-Each photo set has multiple choice for download: low and medium until May 2013.
Starting in May 2013, low, medium and high definition for download.
-The file size for download is small. Two factors control this:
1. The number of photos in a set is small. Usually 60 photos or less, many being 20-50+ pictures.
2. The encoding is good.
For a price of $10 for a month, you can enjoy a large selection of naked girls in natural settings. The girls are not glamorized, but they are attractive. If you have extensive experience in softcore porn, you will recognize many of the
models. If you are in the mood for extremely softcore photos of beautiful women, Domai is worth trying.
Giving the site a score of 85.
There are a large number of attractive models (994).
There are a large number of contributing, professional photographers to the site (133).
The photography, although simple and natural, is professional.
About a year ago, I tried to join a porn site, and I was declined by 3 different credit cards.
Using a fourth card, the join was finally accepted.
It was frustrating.
I don't remember if any of the credit card accounts were frozen on that particular day. Because my memory is not great. But all the credit card accounts were valid, in good order, and the payments were still declined automatically, when I hit the accept the payment link on the join page.
You might not have been black-listed by CCBILL.
Instead, it might have been the credit card company that blocked the transaction from going through.
I've had many of my attempts to join a site declined, because the credit card I was trying to use declined the payment. Many credit card companies view a payment to CCBILL or Epoch or any payment processor that works with porn sites as suspect.
Either they will automatically decline the suspected payment.
Or they will freeze the credit card account for possible fraudulent activity.
Not only have I had many of my credit cards declined by Epoch and CCBILL, but I've also had many of my credit card accounts frozen, and I had to telephone the credit card company itself, and state the attempted charge was a valid transaction (even when the transaction was not approved).
This can happen, even when I have a monthly charge to Epoch or CCBILL on that particular credit card. If I try to add another charge to Epoch or CCBILL to a credit card (through a new join to a paysite).
Credit card companies view almost any payment to CCBILL or Epoch as a red flag, and can refuse payment, freeze the account, or do both at the same time.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount $14.95/month.
Currently, when I hit the PU link to Beauty4K and then hit the join link, I see a price of $29.95/month.
So, instead, use the PU link to Teen Mega World, then hit the join link, and you see $14.95/month.
Membership in Teen Mega World gives you full access to Beauty4K.
-Attractive teen models.
-The network is upgrading the sets, lighting, camera-equipment, etc to produce these videos.
-Zip file for each photo set.
-Can stream or download each video.
-Multiple choices for definition of download.
Cons:
-You need a 4K compatible device to get the benefit of a 4K video. Duh. Otherwise, you can watch the videos on a 1080p device, or a 720p device.
Note: 4K is 2160p.
-4K files take a huge amount of storage space.
A simple example from the Beauty 4K site:
A video has a runtime of 43 min 25 secs.
The file size of the video, for different definitions:
UHD 2160p 4599.97 Mb
HD 1080p 2923.89 Mb
HQ 720p 1675.17 Mb
Med. Quality 540p 1018.97 Mb
Portable Devices 405p 564.16 Mb
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
I realize that the prices of hard drives keep dropping, but a lot of people now have SSDs.
And a single video in UHD takes a lot of space.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-This is a small site. Only 27 videos (and matching photo sets).
-Update rate varies. You might get a new video in 8 days, or 32 days.
The first video is dated 2015-06-08. It's now 2016-04-22. So don't expect the site to grow very fast.
-Most of the videos use the same stunt cock. If you don't like his approach, it takes away from the videos. He comes across as a typical Russian thug. Blunt. Cocksure.
-Streaming option is only offered in one definition.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site theme: The site features videos in 4K UHD (Ultra High Definition).
The videos are young teen girls doing hardcore sex.
Each video is a guy having sex with a girl. That keeps it simple.
-You need a 4K compatible device to get the benefit of a 4K video.
So I imagine that cuts the size of the potential audience by a lot.
Also, this is basically hardcore teen porn. It's not glamcore. There is almost no plot. The visuals are crystal clear, excellent lighting, but it's a guy fucking a girl, with not a lot of variation. No romance or heartcore or eroticism.
Personally, it's more like a gimmick, than a site I would want to join.
However, it's part of the Teen Mega World network. So if you join Teen Mega World, you get access to this site.
Or if you join this site directly, you get access to the rest of the Teen Mega World network.
But--check the price of joining the site directly.
Compare it to the price of joining Teen Mega World directly.
PU/TBP links will give you a discounted price for Teen Mega World of $14.95/month.
Often times, the PU/TBP discounts to individual sites in the Teen Mega World network have a higher price.
I'm giving the site a score of 75. Normally, I give sites in the Teen Mega World network a much higher score, because they all have access to the Teen Mega World network. But if it costs more to produce one of these Beauty 4K videos than a
regular video for one of their other sites, my preference would be for them to put their resources into producing the videos for the other sites, because you get more bang for the buck at the other sites.
I can see if Teen Mega World wanted to produce a softcore or hardcore film like people made in the 1970s with Emmanuelle (1974) or The Story of O (1975). That would be a massive gamble.
But I don't see the sense of putting a lot of resources into a 4K site from Teen Mega World.
It doesn't fit the style of their regular product.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
