Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A large number of very attractive models.
-Professionally shot videos: good lighting, good camera work, good focus, etc.
-A number of the videos feature good performances by the models: they actally seem to be enjoying the sex.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Good download speeds. I get over 5 MB/sec, which is about my maximum download speed.
-Download managers work. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
-Choice of streaming or downloading videos.
-Can choose the file definition you want to download. But since the HD Ultra definition file size is over 1 GB, I choose a lower definition, which still looks good and doesn't take as much hard drive space.
-The videos are in English. So you can understand with the models are saying.
-Each video has a matching gallery. Each gallery is a photo shoot of the video shoot, and not a separately photographed shoot where the model is posed for the best shots possible.
-Can stream a full video, or watch selected sections of the video.
Cons:
-I think the cons are basically minor. The site does a good job of featuring massage videos with hot sex.
-Not much plot. Attractive girl gets a sensual massage, she is so turned on by the masseur that he then fucks her.
-They use the same massage room setting for all the videos: some change in plot, setting, etc., would be nice.
-The download file sizes for the 1080p or HD Ultra definition files are large: can be over 1 or 2 GB, which sucks up a lot of hard drive space. But the smaller definition file sizes are completely watchable, especially if you're watching on a 20-something-inch monitor or less.
-There is a model index with thumbnails of each model, but the models are not listed alphabetically, and the index is cumbersome to use. A simpler, alphabetical listing would be helpful.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is attractive young girls getting an erotic massage and then getting fucked.
A large number of really attractive models.
site stats:
over 360 videos
over 360 galleries (1 gallery per matching video)
There are a number of massage-themed sites out there, but FuckedHard18 is one of the better ones: because the models are attractive, and the sex is hot. It doesn't get any simpler than that.
The girls have very little tattoos or piercings. They are young: late teens, early twenties. Almost all white. Slender to slightly medium build.
Site contents are high quality videos of young, attractive girls getting a massage and then having sex.
It's one guy and one girl. Some might complain there isn't more variety: 2 girls, 2 girls and a guy, group sex, sex toys, anal action, whatever.
This is like a "clean" porn site, where you are watching a girl getting hot, and then watching the guy doing her. Simple, but effective.
Giving the site a score of 90, because I really enjoyed the site. As long as you aren't expecting extreme or dirty sex, or more variety, I think you will too. The models are very attractive, the sex can be very hot.
Setting the options to display 1,000 thumbnails per page makes it easier to view the thumbnails for an entire gallery, without having to click through different pages.
I hope I did not come across as negative on my review of Erotic Beauty.
I think it's a fine site, and I've been a monthly member of the site for over 2 years now, since I was offered a very inexpensive membership price.
But I think that for most people, that a membership to MetArt is the better value, since most people will pay the same monthly or yearly fee to belong to MetArt or Erotic Beauty, and MetArt has far more content, as well as a few other advantages over Erotic Beauty.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login.
-Good download speeds. I get over 5 MB/sec download speed, which is about my maximum download connection.
-Good site structure. Easy to navigate around the site. Since there are so many models and photo sets, you need a simple structure to navigate through the massive contents.
-Alphabetical listing of models, with nice sized thumbnails to show what each model looks like.
-Each photo set has zip files for download, with 3 different definitions to choose from: high, medium, low definition.
-This is a high grade photo site.
-Over 160 contributing photographers, many of them world-class.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before you are timed out of the site due to inactivity.
-Accepts download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
Cons:
-No videos. Photo sets only.
-This is psychology, but since you have a massive amount of beautiful young models, you start to get bored with physical beauty. And many of these models are amazingly beautiful.
-Update rate: 1 photo set per day. This seems poor when compared to MetArt, which averages 4 photo sets per day. But one update per day is probably average for high-end photo sites.
-Erotic beauty has the thumbnails of a photo set presented on up to 7 different pages, so you have to click from one page to another to see the entire set. MetArt has the thumbnails of a set on 2 pages, so it's easier to examine the complete
set without a lot of mouse clicks.
Bottom Line:
I'm reviewing Erotic Beauty, but I think the most meaningful approach is to compare it to MetArt, which is a sister site in the MetArt network of sites.
I've been a member of MetArt and Erotic Beauty numerous times in the past. I finally bought a lifetime membership to MetArt, since I consider it the best softcore site on the internet. And I've been a continuous member of Erotic Beauty for over two
years, since I last joined it using a special offer that was unbelievably inexpensive.
I'm not saying I'm an expert on either site. But I've been enjoying their content for many years.
Erotic Beauty is a high end glamour site, which focuses on softcore teen/early twenties models.
It's basically a smaller version of the MetArt site.
Both sites share the same approach: find attractive teen or early twenties models, and use a wide variety of professional photographers to capture their beauty.
If MetArt didn't exist, Erotic Beauty would be an excellent site to join. But the problem is that MetArt does exist, and a comparison of the two sites shows that MetArt is the far better value for your money:
As far as I can tell, there is nothing to set Erotic Beauty apart from MetArt: nothing in themes, nothing in explicitness.
Any of the Erotic Beauty sets could easily be posted to the MetArt site. And vice versa.
In my opinion, most of the MetArt videos are boring. You have lovely young girls, in softcore poses, and the videos are mainly a waste of time. The photo sets at MetArt (and Erotic Beauty), although softcore, are far more erotic and
interesting than the videos at MetArt. I can't explain the reason the MetArt videos are so boring, although I have noticed that many softcore sites seem to specialize in making softcore videos that are a waste of time.
That's my opinion, anyway, and it seems to be shared by the PU members who have commented on how boring the MetArt videos are.
Many (probably most) of the models that appear in Erotic Beauty also appear in MetArt. Although both sites use many of the same models, the photo sets that appear at one site do not appear at the other site. Each site has exclusive content.
Both sites share the same basic structure.
Both sites offer zip files for each photo set in three definitions: low, medium, and high definition.
Both sites have an alphabetical listing of their models, with nice-sized thumbnails to illustrate each model.
But since the number of models at both sites is so large (over 1,700 at Erotic Beauty, over 3,100 at MetArt), it's exhausting looking through the alphabetical listing to see all the different models. There's just too many attractive girls, and you start to get bored by physical beauty.
Since both MetArt and Erotic Beauty cost the same for a membership, and since MetArt has a catalog of photo sets that is over four times as large, and since there is no added value in an Erotic Beauty photo set over a MetArt photo set, the
advantage obviously belongs to MetArt.
I'm giving Erotic Beauty a score of 85, because it's a good site, but MetArt is a much better value.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Very low membership fee. $7.99/month, or $27.99/year.
-A nice selection of attractive models. Mixture of amateur and professional porn models.
-CCBILL is the payment processor, a trusted name.
-Update rate averages 3-4 new photo sets per week.
-Zishy is based in L.A., California. The girls are a mixture of models and college girls.
-Easy login. After you login to the site, the following logins don't require a username and password, (with cookies enabled).
Cons:
-This is primarily a non-nude site. Do not join if you want to see full-blown nudity, or hard-core sex.
-Although there are many attractive girls, this is not a glamour site: the models are shot with little make-up, with regular-style clothes. The models appear like the girl-next-door.
You honestly would not recognize many of these girls you might have seen at other porn sites, unless you study them and compare them with photos from other sites. The average teenager at a shopping mall or on the street wears more make-up than most of the models photographed at Zishy.
-This is mainly a photo site. There are videos, but the videos are short, most under 3 minutes, some videos under a minute.
Bottom Line:
Zishy is basically a non-nude site.
Occasionally you will see a naked ass, uncovered nipples, even less will you see a naked pussy.
The site theme is less is more: the female form is better served covered, which lets the imagination free to roam.
The aim is to entertain through innocent and playful means.
What is suprising is that you can't tell the professional models from the amateurs unless you have a keen eye and a lot of history with porn models. Basically, the professional porn models are presented as amateurs, with very little of their normal make-up, in regular clothes, in non-porn poses and settings.
The truth is, you will find the average teenager in a shopping mall wears far more make-up, and is better dressed, than the models at Zishy.
In the last year or more, you are seeing a few naked breasts, a few naked asses, but the majority of the photos are still non-nude. This is not a site you should join to see nudity.
It can be interesting to compare the photo sets of the porn models at Zishy with their sets at porn sites.
It illustrates how much the photographer can influence how attractive a model will appear in a photo.
I've said it before, but it bears repeating: a model can appear average-looking, or very attractive, or extremely lovely, depending on how she is photographed. Some sites specialize in making their models as glamorous as possible. Zishy photographs their models to appear "natural", not glamorized or heavily made-up.
When I started checking how many of the models at Zishy were porn models, I was surprised at the number that were featured in soft-core and hard-core sites. Because you would not have any hint from the Zishy photo sets that many of
these girls are willing to show everything they have at more explicit porn sites.
A very few of the models at Zishy who are featured in more well-known porn sites are:
Alaina Fox
Alex Mae
Alice Wonder
Amber Sym
Bailey Rayne
Bree Daniels
Keisha Grey
Dillion Harper
Kenze Thomas
Lily Ivy
Samantha Rone
Jayden Taylors
Maybe my brain is very slow, but I found it fascinating how different a model can appear at the Zishy site versus her appearance at a regular porn site. For some models, you really have to examine the girl, to see it's the same person.
But then again, there are so many porn models out there, that some models resemble each other fairly closely.
Bottom line:
Since the price is so low ($7.99/month, or $27.99/year), it's worth joining to see what the site has to offer. As long as you are not expecting a nude site, Zishy is mainly very softcore tease.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Videos and photo sets are professionally shot: good camera work, good lighting, good sound control, etc.
-Easy navigation: since the site only has 15 videos (and matching photo sets), you can easily see all the contents.
-No DRM.
-The models are attractive. Late teens, or in their twenties.
-Content is exclusive.
-Choice of download or stream videos.
-Download options for each video include: iPod, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Zip file for each matching photo set.
Cons:
-The main drawback is the site is tiny: 15 videos (and matching photo sets). That's all you get.
-Slow update rate: 2 videos (and matching photo sets) per month.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-2-day trial membership for $1 is crippled privileges. Can only watch 10 minutes of 2 videos (and the matching photo sets), with no downloading. For more content or downloading, you must upgrade to full membership.
I don't see any notice on the signup page (before completing the transaction) that the 2-day trial membership is crippled access. I found this information at the TBP site.
-The primary biller is MG Billing, which does not have the recognition of CCBILL or EPOCH.
-Only get one definition for the zip file for each photo set.
-The zip file for each photo set is a numbered file name (e.g. 17991_pics.zip). So have to manually rename the file to add name of model, etc.
Bottom Line:
This is a tiny site.
Currently the site only has 15 videos (with matching photo sets).
The theme is a white woman having sex with a black man.
You get full access to this site with a membership in the Babes.com network.
But it would be a mistake to join this site directly.
The main problem with the site is the small amount of content.
With a fast internet connection, you can download the entire site contents in a few hours or less.
After that download, the site would have little value.
The update rate is 2 videos (and matching photo sets) per month.
There is a 2-day trial membership for $1.00.
However, The Best Porn reports that the trial membership only allows users to view the first 10 minutes of two offered videos, as well as the photos from those videos. For more content or downloads, you must upgrade to a full membership.
So the trial membership, in my opinion, is not worthwhile.
The preview page of the site give a misleading impression that the site contents are far larger than it really is.
On the preview page, you see 56 nice-sized thumbnails of videos.
So you would normally assume that site has those 56 videos, plus whatever other contents.
But--
The 56 thumbnails are showing the 15 videos the site has, with each video being shown multiple times (via a thumbnail), to give the impression there are many more videos at the site than what is real.
That might be legal advertising, but it's certainly misleading.
Anyone joining the site, based on the impression the site holds a lot of videos, would be very disappointed once they realize the site only has 15 videos.
Note: there is a different preview page for the site, that only shows thumbnails for 15 videos. Both preview pages currently exist (the one implying 56 videos, and the one showing 15 videos).
The preview model pages are not accurate. There are 15 models shown (representing the 15 individual models in the site videos). The preview model page states that some models have 1 video, some models have 2 videos, some have 3 videos, and one model has 5 videos.
But in reality, all models have only 1 video at the site.
The only explanation I can think of: is that the number of videos refers to the entire babes network, even though this is a preview page for Black Is Better (and not a preview page for the Babes network).
The bottom line is the site contents are tiny, and because of the slow update rate, the contents will remain tiny for a long time. So is the site worth joining? Not in my opinion. But as a free add-on to a subscription to Babes.com, it's worthwhile checking the site out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nice, clean site design that makes the site easy to use.
-A large selection of attractive models.
-Random updates from other sites.
-Large thumbnails of most models.
-You can download a full video, or selected clips from that video.
-Can also watch the video streaming.
-Good download speeds. I got over 4 MB/sec with DownThemAll.
-Professionally shot videos: good definition, good sound control, good focus, good lighting, etc.
-CCBill is the payment processor, a trusted name.
-Easy login. On my first login, I had to enter username, password, and captcha. On second login, I just hit the member login link, and didn't have to enter anything else. I was automatically entered into the site.
-PU discount of $17.95 for first month.
Cons:
-Captcha required for first login.
-Not sure about update frequency. Apparently, the site does not have exclusive regular updates for the site itself, but uses updates from other sites.
-Many videos download with generic filename. Need to rename the download file to know what it is.
-Can uncheck pre-checked sales offer. But this is the first one I've seen that gives three-day access for free. The free trial turns into an expensive subscription after the three days, if not cancelled. But you get three days for free. So it's worth trying.
-Navigation could be improved if they offered an alphabetical thumbnail listing of their models. Some models in their videos don't even have a name.
-No information about the models, except for their site name.
Bottom Line:
The site has a large number of hardcore videos of attractive young models. Many of the videos are from partner sites.
All of the videos I saw were professionally shot, with good lighting, camera-work, etc.
The models are uniformly attractive, from very attractive to lovely to just breathtaking. Some of the models are actual movie stars, with nude clips from their theatrical movies.
Bottom line:
The four main sites you have access to with a membership (listed above) make this a worthwhile membership. Plus you also get access to a random selection of videos from the partner sites, that give you a flavor of what those sites offer.
Because of the wide selection of site offerings, you get some tease, light hardcore, heavy hardcore.
If you like good quality videos of late teen, early twenties models, this site offers good value for the money.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-No download limits (for regular membership); trial memberships are different.
-No DRM.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Streaming offered in: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p (for newer videos).
-Download offered in: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p (for newer videos).
-Excellent download speeds. I get over 4 MB/sec with DownThemAll.
-DownThemAll download manager works with site.
-A lot of attractive models. Not too many tattoos or piercings.
-Thousands of professionally shot videos-good lighting, good editing, good sound control, etc.
-PU discount of $15 for the first month.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sell on join page.
-Captcha required on login.
-Only some content is exclusive. If you've joined many DVD sites, you will find a lot of videos you've seen before.
-The older videos don't have the newer definition choices that the new content has.
-Some people may be fans of Peter NorthPeter North considers himself a porn star, like a movie star, and his site blog shows photographs an expensive Ferrari he owns. The last announcement from Peter North on his blog was June 7, 2013-so he's not as active on his site any more.
-Many of the newer videos don't feature Peter North himself.
-Peter North also has an online store, where, if you're a fan, you can buy his DVDs, sex toys and apparel. Maybe it's a big ego, or good advertising, but I think it's strange. Strike that. If he can make money selling things, more power to him.
-One new video every 3 days to Peter North site. But the huge backlog at this site and other sites you have access to make this a minor con.
Bottom Line:
By joining this site, you get access to a boatload of hardcore videos of good quality, for a very low price. Peter North is part of the netFameSolutions network, also called the Fame Dollars network, owned and operated by Gamma Entertainment. There are over 100 sites in the network.
My understanding is that the network is broken down into two main sub-networks: When you join either sub-network, you get access to a large number of sites in that sub-network.
For simplicity's sake, I think of the two sub-networks as Devils Film and Evil Angel.
Joining Devils Film (or joining any of the sites included in the Devils Film sub-network) gives you access to all the sites in that particular sub-network.
The Devils Film sub-network also includes a number of smaller sites that are definitely worth examining.
The Devils Film sub-network also includes a number of niche sites that have smaller content, that would appeal to special tastes: Bushy Bushy (models have pubic hair) Curry Creampie (model is supposed to be Indian-from India) Granny Ghetto (older models) Tranny Pros (she-males)
etc.
Bottom line:
You get access to almost 30 different sites for a low price, which makes this a great value.
Some of the sites are worth the price of admission just by themselves:
You also have access to a number of other worthwhile sites, as well as access to the smaller niche sites that might be of interest to someone, or just too exotic for that person's tastes.
Peter North is an icon in porn. Rocco Siffredi is another legend. Silvia Saint and Silverstone are major porn names. I keep repeating myself, but you get a huge amount of professional-quality hardcore videos, for a very low price. This is not glamcore, it's more like soft-gonzo hardcore. The content is 100% different from a glamcore site like X-Art, but this site (and sub-network) is a bargain for what it offers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A large collection of attractive models, in their late teens or early twenties.
-Videos and photo sets are professionally shot: good editing, good lighting, good sound, etc.
-Models are fairly clean: not a lot of tattoos or piercings, they are young.
-Multiple choices for video downloads: ipod sp/480p/720p/1080p (MP4 format only).
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-No site timeout issues (that I am aware of. Can be logged in to site without activity for a long time.)
-Content is exclusive.
-The content (photo sets and videos) shows the posting date to site.
Cons:
-Some hot links lead to 404: Page not found error. Try clicking the hot link a second or third time to see if the video/set will come up.
-Requires capcha to login (in addition to username and password).
-Wish the listing of models was more basic: a simple, alphabetical list of the models. They do have lists, based on top rated/most viewed/my favorites, but it would be easier to search through the models if the list was alphabetical.
-Not a lot of diversity in the models. They are basically white, young, attractive. Some PU members would wish for older models, different ethnicities, body types.
-Uncheck the pre-checked trial membership offer (on the signup page), or you will be dinged for a membership you probably don't want.
-There is a zip file for each photo set, but it comes in only 1 definition, not hi/medium/low definitions many sites offer.
-The zip file for the photo set downloads with a numerical name. Need to rename each photo set file with the model's name, plus data.
Bottom Line:
This is a glamcore site, where attractive young females egage in solo, two-somes (m-f or f-f), or occasionally, three-some sex.
I prefer the X-Art site over the Babes site. The X-Art videos seem to have more heat. The X-Art photos are just more stunning. These are both glamcore sites, but the X-Art experience is grade A, while the Babes experience is grade C. Am I
being too harsh on Babes? It has fine models, but the content is just not up to the standards of X-Art. The navigation for X-Art is simpler than the Babes site. I sound like a shill for X-Art, but I am not. Whenever I join X-Art, I pay the full price for membership (except I do look around for discounts). I have joined X-Art multiple times with a 1-year membership,
because I think it's worth the money. To join Babes for a 1-year membership would be a major waste of time and money.
I joined Met-Art with a lifetime membership, because I think that site is exceptional. The Met-Art videos are boring, but the photo sets, and the models, can be lovely.
Bottom line: If you want glamcore, join X-Art instead of Babes.
Prices listed for Yonitale are wrong.
The prices I see at the Yonitale site are:
30 days no rebill $24.99
monthly rebill $19.99
6 months rebill $49.99
1 year no rebill $100.00
Even though there are many videos that I don't appreciate, I think the network has enough videos that are to my liking that I think it has value for me.
Having said that, my review implied that the network could easily have enough videos that might be appreciated by others for it to be worth joining.
Both my score and the facts/opinions I wrote implied the network has value.
But I definitely think the navigation of the network could be improved. Just my opinion. But I don't find the network as easy to use as other "mega-sites" that have a large volume of videos.
I think the navigation has been improved somewhat, because many years ago, I seem to remember that if you wanted to switch from one site to another, you had to re- login to the new site you wanted. That is no longer the case, you can now switch sites without have to re-enter your username and password.
Also, as part of the navigation, the thumbnail listing of the pornstars has improved. Several years ago, there were many blank spaces in the thumbnail listing (with no picture of the pornstar, just a name). And I believe the thumbnail images are also improved, whether it's a larger thumbnail, or a better picture of the model, from years ago.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price. First month is $14.95 with PU discount.
-Huge number of gonzo hardcore videos.
-Large number of categories or niches, including black, bubble but, shemale, granny, etc.
-Can stream or download the videos.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Download managers work. I use Down Them All.
-Good download speeds. I got over 4MB/sec.
-In site special discounts. Normally I don't bother looking at these, but there are some interesting discounts to other sites.
-Evil Angel: 30 Day Pass for $4.50.
-Club Seventeen: 30 Day Pass for $5.95.
-Team Skeet: 30 Day Pass for $12.95.
-Wide diversity of models: age, race, body type.
-A huge number of download options for some videos: 160p, 240p.360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
Cons:
-They require a captcha to log in to the site. Sometimes the images are hard to read, and you have to try several times to enter the site.
-There are 2565 videos of models who are tattooed or pierced. I don't like tattoos, or piercing.
-Navigation is poor. There are many areas it could be improved.
-Navigation is sometimes confusing. You can click on a link, and be ejected from the site.
-Navigation: You are logged in to the Devil's Film site, but it also shows scenes from other sites in the network.
-I watch porn on my laptop. The videos play, but sometimes the normal controls are not visible: I am referring to the "play", "pause", "time elapsed" controls that are normally at the bottom of the screen.
-I prefer models that are pretty to beautiful. Most models here are just OK to plain.
-Pre-check offer on the join page.
-Biller is fameaid. I prefer CCBILL or EPOCH, which are nationally recognized processors that are easy to deal with.
Focussing on the Devils Film site itself: the site specializes in gonzo sex: crude, rude, low-life sex. Many sub-niches,
almost none of which appeal to me.
So why join?
Because maybe the hardcore gonzo videos will appeal to your tastes.
You get access to several other sites that aren't quite as gonzo. And some of these sites will almost certainly have videos that you might find entertaining.
For example, the Rocco Siffredi site has some videos that are truly hot. You just have to look through the junk to find the videos that appeal.
-Which is one reason I prefer sites like X-Art, where you don't find a lot of junk:
1. the X-Art models are attractive to lovely.
2. the sex is presented in an erotic way.
3. the videos and photosets are shot in high-class, professional manner.
But sometimes you want a change of pace. And Devils Film certainly gives you the bottom of the barrel in hardcore videos.
The videos are shot in a professional manner. The lighting is good, the camera technique is good. But this is gonzo sex, often times kinky sex. And you need a strong stomach to watch a lot of it.
I am giving the site a score of 85: because the site (and the network) gives value for the money:
1. access to a huge amount of hardcore videos.
2. access to a large number of niches.
3. the videos are professionally shot-so they are good quality.
4. the site has excellent download speeds, wide range of download choices for the videos, and it's fairly easy to move around the network from one site to another (You don't have to re-login each time you switch to a different site).
You seem to have at least some experience in porn.
But what you are looking for "women OTHER than your stereotypical Hot teen/early 20s woman" is more of a niche product. Yes, there might be sites catering to that, but they are, as you implied, in the minority.
Glamcore sites are gaining interest, but the content is limited compared to mainstream teen/early 20s women.
As far as Asian, Asian women are some of the most beautiful in the world.
One problem with Japanese porn is the mosaic effect, which is required by Japan.
There are some Japanese porn sites that have some content without the mosaic.
If the mosaic bothers you, you can do google searches of PornUsers.com to see what the members have said about sites that might or might not offer some mosaic-free content.
But most Asian sites focus on the teen/early 20s models.
Do a google search (I'm not expert on Google searches) for PU members who like and have commented on sites that feature mature models. But I don't recall, off-hand, that they have mentioned sites that are combined mature models + glamcore, or non-white models + glamcore.
But like I said, the internet is big, so hopefully you will find sites that you think are worth the money to join.
When you think about it, a large part of enjoying porn is in the hunt.
When you find content that you really like, that is the payoff. But, hopefully, you will appreciate search, as well.
The Porn Users site can be a resource to check on porn sites
And most members are friendly, and willing to share their knowledge and interests.
But porn is a hobby, not a business, for most of us. LOL.
Wow Girls, Wow Porn, and 18 Only Girls are strong in hardcore videos.
Those sites cost about $30, so they are more expensive than Met-Art.
Those site are borderline glamcore.
I think 18 Only Girls is the best value of the three, because it has the most content.
There are different options to join:
You can join any one of the 3 sites by itself, or you can join all 3 sites, but it gets expensive.
Lovely models, professionally shot videos, and the quality of the photo sets has increased in recent years--but not quite to the level of Met-Art or MPL Studios.
There are a bunch of other glamcore sites that were created the last few years.
What is the best value for you is truly personal: what your likes are, what you enjoy.
Do you focus on photos, videos, what type of women do you like (age, body type, race), softcore, hardcore, fetishes, etc.
The Met-Art network, which might have sites that you would find interesting.
Can you be more specific in what you are looking for? And the truth is, I'm not a real expert on porn or glamcore: other PU members might quibble about what glamcore is, or even what softcore midcore or hardcore is. Everyone seems to have their own opinions.
I'm rambling, but you or I could write book-length replies on what "glamcore" sites you might like. :)
There are a number of glamcore sites. Most of them good, but it's a question of how much money do you want to spend.
Unlimited money, a lot to explore.
But for most people, you only join one or two sites, on a limited budget.
First, what are your interests, likes?
Do you want mainly photos, or mainly videos, or a combination of the two?
What type of women are you interested in? All ages, teen, mature, what?
Ethnicity: most sites are mainly white models, but some sites emphasize other races as well.
For teen to early 20s women, photos only, softcore, Met-Art is my favorite site.
The site also has a lot of videos of beautiful naked women, but I find the videos almost all boring, and so do most other members at PU who have commented.
But at $20/month, or $99/year if you really like the site, this is a great value.
MPL Studios is also a good choice. Mostly softcore, but the videos have a slightly harder edge than Met-Art.
$30/month membership.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The collection of models rivals any porn site on the Net, as far as attractiveness of the models.
-The videos and photosets are professionally shot: excellent lighting, good camera technique, the models are professionally made-up, the costumes are good quality, as well as the sets.
-Choice of hi, standard, low, and mobile definition for videos;
-Choice of hi, medium and low definition for photo sets.
-No download limits.
-No DRM. Download a video or photo set, it's your to keep.
-Zip files for photo sets in low, medium and high definition.
-Epoch is the biller, a respected name for payment processors.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can use download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
-Excellent download speeds. I get up to 4.6-4.9 MB/sec downloading a file.
-All content is exclusive.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor. This is mainly a well-designed site, that is easy to use.
-No search engine. A good search engine would save a lot of time for members who have specific needs.
-The models are 18 to early 20's. Mostly white. Extremely attractive. There's no variety beyond that. So if you want to see mature women, or different ethnic backgrounds, you won't find it here.
-You can sort the models by popularity, newness, name or age, but the listing order is clunky: You have to scroll down the page numerous times, to bring up more models, instead of just being able to scroll smoothly down to see all the models.
-The action might be too soft for some tastes. This is consensual sex: almost no hitting the women, slapping, spitting, forcible sex.
-Updates average one per 2-or-3 days. Would like more updates. But the site emphasizes quality over quantity, which is a good idea.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Number of models: 200+
Number of photosets: 800+
Number of videos: 600+
This is one of my favorite glamcore sites. It does an excellent job presenting the models as attractively as possible.
The models are almost all lovely to look at: they range from attractive to stunning to drop-dead gorgeous. Examine the model pages to see what I mean: these girls could be movie stars, based on their physical looks.
Note: The photographer can have a massive effect on how attractive a model appears in a photograph. The X-Art site photographers do a great job in showcasing their models. A model that might appear as just OK or slightly attractive at a different site, can appear to be alluring or beautiful or gorgeous in X-Art photos.
Most of the action is sweet, loving, gentle sex, either solo, twosome (boy-girl, girl-girl), or threesome (mainly 2 girls + 1 boy). The sex is mainly presented as between consenting adults who are giving each other pleasure. There is very
little gonzo sex. Recently, they have introduced a few videos/photosets showing a more forceful, 50-shades-of-grey style, since that seems to be the flavor of the month. But even then, you assume the sex is consensual.
When the site started, it was called "Beauty is Divine", and the content was strictly softcore photos of lovely models, but no videos.
Then the site became "X-Art", and they started adding videos, and the focus changed from softcore photography to glamcore, where they started adding sex, which over time became more and more explicit.
If you haven't tried glamcore, this site is definitely worth at least a 1-month membership, just to see what glamcore is.
The PU discount means $20/month. Considering the quality of the site (exceptionally beautiful models, professionally shot photosets and videos), you get more than your money's worth, if you are into soft, erotic sex. The site has been around since 1999, so there is a large amount of content (photosets and videos) to explore.
Excellent review.
I agree with almost everything you wrote.
Also, pleasantly surprised you gave Met-Art a score of 99.
Makes me feel that I am in good company. :)
I agree the old format is much easier and simpler to use.
Plus, it's the once I've been accustomed to.
Separately, the new format can mess up the intro page.
A few days ago, the new format page came up automatically, and everything was in tiny size. The thumbnails were tiny, the text size was tiny, and there were 2 black bars on the sides of the page that took up most of the page.
I sent an email to Met-Art support, asking how to get rid of the page and return to the old format.
Support emails me back, within a few hours, but their reply was not useful. They said they could not duplicate the effect that I was seeing for the Met-Art page.
I increased the size of the page using the VIEW-ZOOM option on my Firefox browser, and that allowed me to find the icon to return to the old format. (I couldn't read the page in the new format since everything was so tiny, except for the 2 black bars which were taking up most of the page.)
Anyway, I will use the old format as long as I can.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-In my opinion, the best softcore photo site on the internet.
-Over 3,000 models. Many of the models are lovely to stunningly beautiful.
-A wide range of professional photographers contribute to this site.
-A huge backlog of photo sets. Site started in 1998, as MostEroticTeens.com (hence the name change to Met-Art.com).
-The site updates daily with 4 to 6 photo sets + videos per day. So not only a huge backlog of content, but a truly generous update rate as well. Most updates are photo sets.
-You get a small bio sheet on the models, that includes their age when shot, body measurements, and a brief note on what they like. Not much a bio sheet, but it makes the girls more real.
-No DRM. You download a photo set, it's yours to keep.
-Excellent download speeds. I get 5.5 or 5.6 MB/sec, which is extremely fast for me.
-Fast response from technical support. You get an an email within a few hours that shows a human actually read your problem email and is helping.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-Site is basically easy to use. However, because of the huge number of models and photo sets, it can take months to search through the site to find everything you will like.
-There is an index of the models, with a large thumbnail of the model to show what she looks like.
-There is also an index of the contributing photographers. With the photo sets from each photographer.
-So you can search by the name of the model, or by the name of the photographer.
-You can comment on each photo set (or photographer). And there is an active community that discusses their likes and dislikes of the photo sets. Most comments are positive, but negative comments are allowed. And the contributing photographer sometimes responds.
-No download limits.
-CCBill is the billing agent-one of the best credit card processing agents on the Net.
-Allows the use of download managers. I use DownThemAll, a free download manager.
-The photosets are offered in three sizes for download and viewing.
Bottom Line:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-The photosets have separate zip files for low definition, medium definition, and high definition.
CONS
-The cons are basically minor. This is the best softcore erotic site on the Internet.
-Not strictly a con, but the site is softcore erotic. No hardcore porn. If you want hardcore, look elsewhere.
-The videos are boring. They have tried in recent years to make the videos more erotic. These are videos of attractive models that are naked, but the videos are disappointing, and mainly a waste of time and effort.
-Because of the huge amount of the photo sets, and the 3,000 plus number of models that are mainly attractive to stunningly lovely, it's a natural human reaction to become slightly bored with the site. Back in the day when Playboy and Penthouse were in their glory days, you only got those magazines once a month, so the impact of each issue was more potent. Because Met-Art has thousands of photo sets and thousands of lovely models, instead of appreciating how wonderful the
site is, you start to feel bored by the loveliness and attractiveness of the models and photo sets. That is human psychology. You want what you don't have, but once you get it, the value of what you have diminishes.
-Some people object that the photos don't meet the professional standards that they are seeking. Again, that is human nature. There will always be people who object or complain about any beautiful model or photo or object. The site features attractive to stunningly beautiful models that are photographed by professional photographers.
Obviously, not every photo set is a masterpiece, but you get access to a boatload of softcore photos of lovely women.
-Most models are 18 to early 20s. White, slender to medium build. You don't get a lot of variety in the models as far as age or race or build.
BOTTOM LINE:
MetArt is best site for softcore erotic photography on the Internet.
Based on a variety of factors:
1. Huge number of attractive models (over 3,000 models).
2. Huge number of photo sets (around 15,000 sets, which will take you many months to look through.
3. Over 1,000 videos, which you can use to put yourself to sleep through boredom. Maybe a few videos are truly erotic, but the erotic videos are few and far between).
4. Hundreds of contributing photographers. So you get access to a range of styles. But the overall approach is softcore erotic.
5. Site is easy to use. Can search by name of model, name of photographer, or by other attributes: hair color, age of model, eye color, ethnicity, etc.
6. A low price (with PU discount). $20/month, or $100/year.
There are other sites that are similar, that offer high grade photography and lovely models: MPL Studios and Femjoy are 2 of the closest competitors. But even though they are both Mega-sites (huge content of photo sets and large number of lovely models), Met-Art is the biggest site as far as number of photo sets and number of models.
I enjoy the photo sets at Met-Art and MPL Studios more than the photo sets at Femjoy. The Met-Art and MPL Studios photos seem fresher, the models look more attractive, than the models at Femjoy. Many of the Met-Art and MPL Studios models also
appear at Femjoy, but I normally prefer the Met-Art and MPL studios sets over the Femjoy sets.
Other people can and do appreciate the Femjoy style over the Met-Art style, and have stated so. So it's a matter of personal preference.
This is my third review of Met-Art. I gave it a score of 97 in my first review (which was also my first review for PU), a 99 in my second review (because the number of models and photo sets just keep increasing).
In this review I am giving Met-Art a score of 99.
I know many members feel that a score of 99 for any site is wrong. They believe that any site can be improved, and that a score of 99 ignores whatever faults a site may have.
But I believe that Met-Art is the best softcore site on the Internet. And that because of many
factors that I listed, it does deserve a score of 99. In spite of the boring videos.
I have been dinged a few times by the pre-checked cross sales.
From my experience, what I've learned:
You can not get a refund on a pre-checked cross sale.
Even if you call the billing company within minutes of the pre-checked cross sale going through, and even if you have never used the subscription to the pre-checked cross sale site, you will still not get a refund.
The only thing you can do is cancel the subscription to the pre-checked cross sale site as soon as possible, so you won't be billed the expensive, additional charge for the cross sale site going into the monthly rate.
Because the monthly rate for the cross sale site is almost always very expensive, much more than the normal monthly rate for the site you can find elsewhere.
So it definitely pays to examine any site join page, to make sure any pre-checked cross sells are unchecked.
A fine, professional review.
I'm putting this network on my list of sites to join.
I was put off by the stupid-sounding network name, but your review has sold me.
LOL.
Brings back fond memories of looking at photos on a CRT monitor.
Actually, my LCD monitor recently went out, and I'm now using an old CRT monitor I still have, until I buy a new LCD monitor replacement.
The LCD monitors really have a much better image than the old CRT monitors (or maybe I'm just talking about all the spots on my old CRT monitor that I am currently using).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
