A nice, sensible review that clearly shows the problems at this site.
I just don't have the patience anymore to keep looking for content by a particular model that I might like.
Years ago, I would look through a site searching for material from my favorites, but not any more. I get frustrated and just give up.
I used to love JAV (not the mosaic, but how attractive the models were). But I need a model index that is fast and easy to use.
Not a fan of bukkake.
Also, I don't like the noises the girls make during sex. I know it's supposed to mean they are hot, but it just seems like they are uncomfortable, or protesting against the pleasure, or being forced against their will. Whatever. Maybe I should learn to turn to sound off, but sound normally adds to a video, unless it's really fake, or poorly done.
Could you explain more clearly how to get the discounted price? Or what the discount price is?
If Metart reported that other subscribers using Comcast were having trouble accessing the Metart site, it seems likely that Comcast was the source of your connection problem.
I have used AT&T and DSL Extreme, and have never had any problem connecting to Metart. And I've been a Metart subscriber many times over the years.
Maybe you should consider using another internet provider, if you have any other problems with your connections. If that is a possibility.
The sender was listed as Alex.
The subject title was "Good news to [Your Name]".
Date sent was Sat 4:21 AM. (That was Jun 7, yesterday).
The offer was to join X-Angels, which is part of the Teen Mega World network.
You join X-Angels, you get access to the total network, which is over 30+ sites.
The new site, X-Angels, looks like a winner. The models featured are great-looking teens.
I also got a duplicate of the same email (same sender, subject title, body of email) sent on Fri 10:32 AM.
The emails went to my Inbox, not my Spam box. I don't have the sender in my contact/address book, but maybe it went to my Inbox because the header included my real name.
The body of the email was:
Our Dear [Your Name],
We are glad to inform you that we’ve just launched a new site X-Angels which is full of perfect and amazing DSLR Movies. This site is updated regularly with brand new, steaming hot sets with the most beautiful teenage models! Beauty is our business and we provide you only with alluring, arousing, and high definition video clips and pictures galleries starring a steady stream of stunning young ladies with perfect bodies.
Rejoin now just for $14.95
Come Back Now for only 14.95
This letter was sent to you because you were subscribed to the one of our sites. Click Here To Unsibscribe.
Maybe it was a momentary glitch, but I now see a link for the discounted prices ($10/month) to join other sites in the MetArt network, if you are already a member of one of the sites in the network.
Did MetArt drop their discount plan for joining other sites in the network?
It used to be, if you were a member of any of their sites, you could join any other site in the network for a discounted price of $10.00 per month.
But I don't see that being offered any more.
Edit: I noted in a comment that when I entered MetArt later, I found the link for the reduced subscription prices.
However, I now enter the MetArt site, and the link for the reduced subscription prices is now missing again.
I don't know if this is because my PC has stored a copy of the site page without the link, or whether the MetArt site server is being updated, or what the problem is.
But I think the discount link is really valuable, and I would hate to see it go.
I did not "literally" mean to ask "advertise a fate worse than death". I just meant that there used to be an expression "a fate worse than death", and what did the expression mean.
So my meaning was definitely not clear, based on the replies given.
And when I gave the poll choices, I was trying to inject a bit of humor or oblique thought in the choices, because the common historical meaning was a woman who had been violated, but in today's culture, it could be interpreted as any crime or transgression against a person that was terrible.
jberryl69, in some of my reviews I tend to ramble, but your comment goes all over the place.
I read Tarzan when I was an early teen, and I don't remember Jane being raped. And I'm sure (because ERB was writing in a different climate than the current one) that Jane was utterly pure when she married Tarzan. Tarzan might have kissed her before marriage, but even though they were both living together in the jungle before they were married, there was absolutely no hanky-panky going on. Not like modern times.
Your comment reminds me that I enjoyed Tarzan and also John Carter of Mars when I was much younger. I will try to read some of them again, to see if I can still find pleasure in reading them today, or if my tastes (and ideas) have changed too much.
Yes, I signed up for the MerArt newsletter earlier this year, after belonging to MetArt many times over the years.
The thumbnails in the newsletter are easy to see. And clicking on a thumbnail brings up a sample gallery of the model's photosets, with nice sized thumbnails.
Clicking on any thumbnail in the sample gallery brings up a 1/3 full-sized photo of the thumbnail. Which is easier to use than the slideshow display for viewing galleries at MetArt.
Even though I am currently a MetArt member, I sometimes use the newsletter thumbnail system to look for new models.
There aren't a lot of sites that offer public preview thumbnails of their galleries.
I am more interested in whether a site offers a complete listing of their models, with a nice thumbnail to show what they look that.
I like to use the slideshow that many sites offer, to view the galleries, to see what the photos look like, before I decide whether to download the set or not.
Because at too many sites, when I look at the thumbnails of the individual photos, the thumbnails are too small to see what the photos looks like.
Even at Metart, which is still primarily a photo site (even though a few of their newer videos are almost interesting), I can barely make out what the model looks like from the thumbnail.
Years ago, the model thumbnails seemed larger. Maybe it's my eyes, but the thumbnails today are just too small at Metart to clearly see what the model (or her individual thumbnail photos) looks like.
You can increase the image size, but that means part of the page is offscreen, and then you have to return to normal size or fiddle with the mouse if you view different pages. Normal size means less fiddling.
If you've been a member of Metart, you've probably seen and admired his photo sets.
At this site, he has an eye for lovely young models (late teens, early 20s).
Softcore glamor style.
There's enough content (photo sets and videos) for a 1-month membership.
But the site is small compared to MPL Studios or Femjoy, and tiny compared to Metart.
For a while they had an offer of $9.99/month. But that apparently expired.
I was just a member, and they sent me an email inviting me back, at a special price of $24.99/month, which is their regular price.
PU offers a discounted price of $14.95/month (recurring).
(Automated programs sometimes don't make a lot of sense. It's nice that they have a automated program offering a special price to former members. But when the special price turns out to be the same as the regular price, you sometimes wonder if anyone is asleep at the wheel driving your machine.)
Unrelated topic:
Why do they have a captcha when you want to check the balance on your gift card?
You have to enter the number of the gift card.
Then you have to enter the captcha.
Who the heck is going to use this service to steal something, or play games, or whatever. Why add a captcha, when some of them are so fricking hard to read, you have to enter the captcha several times before you guess it correctly.
If I were God, I'd design to world to suit me better. First, I would assign 100 of the most beautiful girls to satisfy my wants. Then I would increase my wants to satisfy those lovely girls.
Glad you found some of the new content to your liking.
I always thought the selection of models was very good.
The videos are normally good quality. Not as fine as what's shown at X-Art or Diesel Access, but still good quality.
Some of the videos ar Diesel are also at Teen Mega World, but the Diesel site offers those videos in higher definition, and I think the colors and lighting of those duplicated videos is slightly better at Diesel.
I don't know how that works. I assume that Teen Mega World and Diesel both bought a license for those videos, and the Diesel sites are set up to offer the videos in a wider choice of definitions than the Teen Mega World sites.
What is the site that licenses those videos? Is it still in business?
I always thought that the price to license those videos/photosets was surprisingly low.
Because those models were generally extremely attractive. And the videos and photosets were professionally shot.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low intro price of $9.95 first month, recurring $29.95/monthly.
-Loads of attractive models.
-Wide variety of models. You get some content of your popular porn stars, and loads other girls as
well.
-Fast download speeds. I get over 2MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout (I just got timed out. Lost my place. So this site is not as generous as some in site timeout.)
-Professionally shot videos. Good lighting, good colors, good focus, good sound control, etc.
-Lots of niches covered.
-Easy navigation. But there are so many attractive models, you get tired looking through the videos, trying to decide which to view.
-Lots of viewing options. Can stream, or download in different definitions.
-Zip file for photosets.
-Content is basically exclusive.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor.
-The $9.95 for first month is a great bargain for a great network. But renewing at $29.95/month
makes you wonder about renewing.
-There is a pre-checked cross-sell, but it was easy to see and uncheck.
-Initial signup was a little strange. I was rejected 4 times when I tried to use a Master card to sign up. I switched to a Visa card and was accepted the first time.
-For some videos, I get the message: "A plugin is needed to display this content". Most videos will
stream, but a few don't.
-The ultra high quality video files can be large. 1.4 GB for a runtime of 32 minutes.
-The search box returns can be buggy sometimes. You enter "Mia Malkova", who has 2 videos and 2
matching photosets, and the search returns, "Your search - Mia Malkova - did not match any documents." The search box is supposed to search the entire network, not just the site you are currently logged in to.
-The default filename is a random number.
Bottom Line:
The site/network is easy to use, once you get over how many models and videos and photosets there are. It should be a real pleasure going through the high quality contents of attractive women doing dirty sex. But the sheer magnitude of the contents-strangely-almost makes it seem like work.
Sites like X-Art and Diesel Access network, while far smaller, just seem easier to use, because,
psychologically, you know there's less material. And I like or appreciate the models at X-Art and
Diesel Access network more. The videos at those sites seem more intimate, the approach is more
glamcore/heartcore. I don't mean the 21SexTury videos are gonzo. But the models at 21Sextury appear more hardcore pros, while the models at the other two sites I mentioned just seem to give a softer, more real vibe to their performances.
-The best things about this network/site: A large number of lovely models. The videos are crystal
sharp, well focused, good lighting, professionally shot, good colors.
-What is unusual, is that the accompanying photosets are really high quality. The photos are taken by professional photographers who know what they are doing. So you have high quality photos of lovely young models in sexual situations.
Most of the sites focus on a particular niche. At other networks, there might be little attempt to focus the content. But this network makes an effort to supply content specific to the theme of the site.
-Can view the photos online, or download the photoset in a zip file.
-The photoset zip files give two options: normal, and high resolution definitions. (Older photosets
might have just a normal definition zip file).
-Photosets have 100+ photos per set.
-Can stream or download the videos.
-Video runtime averages 30+ minutes per video.
Older videos give you a choice of medium or high definition for download.
Newer videos give you more choices for definition for download:
Low quality H.264
Medium quality wmv
Medium quality H.264
High quality wmv
Ultra high quality wmv
Ultra high quality H.264
-You can download the entire video, or can select partial scenes from the video for download.
-With so many sites (you get access to 39 sites), and so many models, and so many videos and photosets to examine, it's easy to feel overwhelmed. Just bite the bullet, and keep looking, and you will almost certainly find models and videos and photosets that will appeal.
The introductory price of $9.95 for the first month (recurring at $29.95/month thereafter) makes this a real bargain. I don't know why I haven't tried this site before.
I clicked on the email that said I should verify my eamil address.
It did not sign me up to any other sites.
Tangub (a fellow PU member) said he didn't bother clicking on the email, and it made no difference. He was still able to access the site with his password and username, anyway.
So I don't think they are trying to trick anyone.
You do have to uncheck the pre-checked cross-sell on sign-up, or you will be charged and subscribed to a trial offer to a different site.
But the pre-checked cross-sell is easy to see on sign-up. Some sites hide the pre-checked cross-sell in lots of fine print.
$9.95 for the first month is a great deal. There are tons of hardcore videos, and a few of the models are incredibly attractive. Searching though the videos can be exhausting, because there must be thousands. A lot of attractive models. Lots of different niches. So I would think there would be more than enough to satisfy most people for 1 month, if they can find the videos or photographs or models that appeal to them.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
