Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Most of the videos I saw had models who appear to be real latin teens or early twenties.
-This site is part of the Team Skeet network. Access to any site in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Easy login to site. Once you have logged in, you do not have to re-enter your login information, just click the "members" link to re-enter the site.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I got 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Can stream or download many videos in multiple definitions.
-$17.87/month recurring discounted price through PU.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor.
-Content does not have a posting date.
-In many of the videos the guys are wearing condoms. Doesn't bother me, but some viewers might not like it.
-When you log into the site, the first page you see is a cross-sell to some other porn site. If you click the "No thanks" link, you then enter the members area. This is minor, but it's one of
the few porn paysites I've seen where you have to bypass an advertising screen before you can enter the members area.
But then again, I believe that Amazon sells some e-readers or other branded devices, that come with automatic advertising. And if you pay a one-time fee, you get rid of the automatic advertising.
-Most of the videos are in Spanish. But who cares what the models or stunt cocks are saying? It's probably better if you don't understand, because that gives the videos an exotic flavor. Also, you have to admit, these latina models sure speak a lot more, and more naturally, than the Eastern European porn models.
Bottom Line:
This is a teen hardcore site featuring latina models.
The models are late teens or early twenties.
There are a lot of attractive models.
The body types are latin: so you don't get the preponderance of skinny white teens you have at many teen sites. At this site, you get a cross-section of skinny and medium-sized girls. Most of the girls have little or no tattoos. Very little piercing on most girls.
Most of the videos are 1 guy - 1 girl. There are a few 1 guy - 2 girls.
Videos
Number of videos: 168+
Runtime: about 20 to 40 minutes.
They have a number of different ways you can view a video.
For streaming, some have a choice of watching in low, medium, or high definition.
You can also choose to watch the entire video, a preview of the video, or break the video into which segment you want to watch.
For a video that run 29 minutes, you can select your starting point to watch at 0 (the start of the video), at 05.55 which means 5 minutes 55 seconds), at 11:54, 17:51, or 23:48.
Or you can choose to download:
1080p MP4; 720p MP4; HI mpg4; LOW mpg4; low WMV; IPod file.
They have a photo gallery for each video.
They also have a screen cap gallery for each video.
I'm not sure why they have both a photo gallery as well as a screen cap gallery. That seems like overkill.
But this site is geared more for videos than photos.
The photo galleries and the screencap galleries, for me, are a waste of resources and site space. I realize that the operators are trying to provide a complete resource for their members. But I appreciate photos from sites like Metart, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., where they try to present the models as attractively as possible.
At this site, they are presenting the models in a "natural" way.
So this approach might have fans, but I'm not one of them. If you can put your mind into a frame that the photo sets and the screen caps are like a stop-motion record of a latin guy getting ready to have sex with a latina, and then having the sex, then maybe you would appreciate the photos and screen caps. But I think it's just a waste of time, since you can watch the video directly.
Models have only 1 video at Oye Loca. But a few models might have a second video at another site in the network, and still fewer could have 3 or 4 videos scattered throughout the network.
They do provide a limited amount of data for each model. For example: for the model Sienna West:
Birthday: November 6
Birth Location: Orange County
Measurements: 34DD-24-34
Height: 160 cm - 5 feet and 3 inches
Weight: 55 kg - 121 lbs
Haircolor: Red
Nationality: Uruguay
Ethicity: Caucasian
Tatoos: Stars on both wrist; back of neck
Piercings: Navel, nose, upper lip
If you are into latina girls, or if you are tired of watching the slender young white teens featured at many other sites, then this site could provide a nice change of pace.
And with the other 13 sites that are included with a membership, you also get a nice variety of teen-early twenty models in a variety of settings and situations.
Giving the site a score of 85. That's highly subjective. Some users might rate it higher. Other users could rate it lower.
I always preferred Metart over Femjoy. I certainly don't look at every photoset, and I skip most Metart videos without looking at them because I've found very few videos at Metart that I really like, no matter how much I might like their models.
But I haven't noticed any toys at Metart recently. I'm currently a Metart member.
If I do find a Metart photoset with toys, I will try to post this warning to the PU site.
I had a little time on my hands, so I was re-reading some old reviews.
This review of yours is excellent. Gives lots of the site details and useful opinions. And is very readable.
Maybe this is off topic, but I joined Muse.org for a 1-year membership in 2009. The price for a 1-year membership was a little more than the cost of 2-month membership, so I chose the 1-year membership.
My mistake.
There were almost no updates during my membership period of 1 year.
I also had a difficult time trying to gain access to the site. The site continually gave me an error message saying: "Sorry, the
page you requested could not be found or you do not have the necessary authorization."
The emails I sent to technical support/customer service were never answered.
But finally, the site did post a notice that because the site hadn't updated for such a long period, they were offering a free extended membership to members, for either 6 months or 1 year.
I sent emails to customer service/technical support at the site asking for my "free" extended membership.
I never got any response. Never got the "free" extended membership that was being advertised.
I should have requested a refund from CCBill, because they are a reputable billing agent. If I ever have a similar problem, I will definitely ask for a refund.
I wasted my membership money, and was left with a bitter aftertaste.
According to The Best Porn, muse hasn't updated the site since 2009.
I'd say it is just part of the fallout from the economic downturn that has affected porn sites. A lot of porn sites are giving less frequent updates. And to try to hide that fact or make it less obvious, some sites might be recycling some of their older content, or posting content that was previously posted on other sites or networks.
But that is slightly different from a site that offers an improved version of a photoset or video, in a higher definition, or some other improvement of the content. In that case, at least in my opinion, a new posting date for the content is warranted.
But the worst case, in my opinion, is where the site has run out of funds, or is in financial difficulty, and they stop posting new content entirely. Which makes the site an archive site. And then you just have to hope, if you join the site, that you didn't sign up for more than a 1-month membership. And you have to hope that they are still working on the site to keep it working properly, so that you don't have broken links to the photosets and videos, download problems, etc.
I don't understand file size. For years, the file size of photosets kept increasing. But lately, at least on Metart, the file size has been getting smaller. Maybe the site is using a better compression program for their photos. And I certainly wish more sites tried to reduce the file size for their videos and photosets, while still keeping the quality.
I've never been a member. But from the preview area, I think I prefer X-Art or Diesel Access (the Diesel network) for this type of erotic video. That's just a guess, because, like I say, I've never been a member of this site.
But if you are a member of any of the MetArt sites, you can usually get a discounted membership to any of the other sites in their network. So that's a good thing to remember.
The only female teacher I ever saw outside of the school environment, from kindergarten through high school, was a woman who I saw a few times in church. She wasn't wearing a bikini, that I can recall. Just very conservative clothes.
Maybe if I had seen some "hot babe" teachers back then it might have been different. Or maybe I was just backward. But teachers back in the 1950s and 1960s were authority figures. Not like the teachers and parents that are being portrayed in films from the 1980s on, where the kids and teens are cool and smart and the adults are clueless idiots.
Actually, though, that's a great description: magnificent 35-40 year old blond ... in a small yellow bikini - and hips like..wow.
That could still give me something to dream about. Lol.
Regarding "Surely you can roughly work out the models age from the time it was first published?"
My mind is focused on enjoying these natural beauties.
Taking the current age of the model, then subtracting the number of years the photoset was published to get the model's approximate age at the time of the photoshoot, somehow interferes with that enjoyment. If my mind could perform these calculations automatically, that would be different. But I have to think about the different dates to calculate, and why should I have to?
In that case, it's easier to ignore the exact age of the model, both current and at the time of the photoshoot.
I'm talking about my personal psychology. Someone else could easily have a different point of view.
I'm a bit older than you are. So if I'm still around in 20 years time, I might be thinking these 40+ year old models are looking damn fine. That's if I can still see and think in my 80s. :)
Depending on where you look on the Metart site, you can find the current age of the model, and also the age of the model at the time of each photoshoot.
When you download a zip file of a photoshoot, you get a text file of the model's bio included. That text file bio lists the current age of the model, instead of her age at the time of the photoshoot.
It would be better for the downloaded text file included with each photoshoot to give the age of the model at the time when the photoshoot was shot, instead of her current age.
Too many laws and restrictions about buying a handgun in California. You even need to check to see if the handgun you are thinking of buying is on the approved list of handguns that can be sold in the state. To buy or to sell, legally, you need to fill out forms, and it has to be done through a registered dealer.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some very nice, attractive models.
-Choice of streaming or download for videos.
-Streaming offers low, medium and high definition.
-Download offers low, medium, high (720p), and very high (1080p).
-There is also an iPod file type for download.
-Easy login. Once you have logged in to this network, for subsequent logins, just hit the members link and you are inside the site without having to enter your username or password.
-No DRM.
-Fast download speeds. I usually get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Content appears to be exclusive to this site.
-Many of the models are early in their career in porn.
-PU discount of $17.87/month recurring.
-The network is dropping the pre-checked cross-selling agreements that are found when you join the network sites.
Cons:
-Most cons are basically minor - if you can get past the amateur or homemade flavor of the site contents, or appreciate that approach.
-The names of a few models are not their most common names.
Tiff Love is better known as Tiffany Thompson or Tiffany. Many porn models have multiple names, but a major starlet like Tiffany Thompson should be given the name of Tiffany, or Tiffany Thompson, instead of creating a new name of Tiff Love.
-The video camera operator is amateur quality: he needs to learn
to frame the model better, to move the camera smoothly so the picture doesn't jerk, to move back from the actors so the picture shows more of the model instead of cutting off parts of the model's body from the picture. The overall effect is that you are watching an amateur home video, instead of a professionally shot video. The site is pretending to show you home made videos. But I much prefer to watch professional videos that are shot correctly.
Bottom Line:
Note: I was specifically referring to the poor camera work at the She's New site of the network. The camera work at the Rub A Teen site, of this network, is professional quality.
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the Team Skeet network. Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites in the network.
There are currently 14 sites in the network. The network focuses on models in their teens or early twenties.
Number of videos at site: 50+
Rate of updates: 1 video per week.
Video runtime: 11 to 32 minutes. Many are 15 minutes or less.
The options for viewing and downloading the videos at this site (and network) are extensive.
You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition.
You can download in low, medium, high (720p) and very high (1080p) definitions. There is also an iPod file format for downloading.
The site description states:
"We've got the hottest teens, first timers, and complete amateurs getting nice and nasty. We get submissions everyday from couples, ex's, and horny exhibitionist who want to spice things up!"
You also get a photoset of photos for each video, as well as a gallery of screencaps for each video. But the photosets, like the videos themselves, appear to be taken by a poor amateur
photographer. If the amateur approach turns you on, maybe the photosets are worth keeping. Otherwise, the photos are just poorly framed, poorly lighted, poorly colored pictures that are
not worth keeping.
I much prefer the professional quality photosets at sites like Met-Art, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., versus the amateur approach that She's New tries to emulate. Actually, most amateur photos and videos I've seen (which are non-nude) show much more professional technique than the photos and videos at the She's New site.
I am judging the site by my enjoyment of the videos and photosets. If, instead, I was rating the site on how well the site is emulating that these videos and photosets were submitted by amateurs, who had poor techniques for filming, I would rate the site higher. But like I said, most (non-nude) videos and photosets I have seen, taken by amateurs, show much higher professionalism in the results.
By joining any site in the network, you gain access to all the sites in the network. You get a wide range of hardcore themes for the teen/young twenties models: high school, amateur, latina, black, big tits, blow job.
It varies. There are some forums I look at regularly, like the one on upcoming movies. And I sometimes sometimes check back over past posts to refresh my memory, or just to see what people might have said about some movie I am interested in.
No. I saw some anime porn (photos and videos) years ago, and it was very artistic. Maybe even collectible. But my regular porn collection is based on real human models.
Maybe they are running out of money, and that's why the updates have slowed and then stopped.
A lot of sites that I liked, in the past, stopped updating, and then became archive sites that no longer updated, but they were still on the internet, accepting memberships, without changing their splash pages that promised daily/weekly/whatever updates. And many of them had longer-term membership offerings of multi-month or even a yearly membership. So anyone joining for a longer-term membership probably felt cheated.
So you can say this site has a trust problem, or, more likely, that it has had financial problems. In that case, if you don't think the site contents are worth a 1-month membership, then give it a pass.
Quite often, when a site has financial problems, they don't work on the site to keep it working properly. And then you can have broken links, problems with videos or photosets that you might not be able to access, etc.
It's a shame, but a lot of sites that I really liked, that had what was good content at the time, just fall on hard times, and either stumble on, or disappear.
(I'm not saying that this site was one of my former favorites. I've never been a member here, and even if it was still in good condition, I've got other sites that I like better.)
But even if this site has content that might appeal to you, you are probably better off looking for sites that are in better financial health, where you can hope for a better membership experience.
If you are still a member of Wow Girls, or one of the Diesel Access Sites, then you can see the Live Shows the girls put on. It's a live chat show put on by Diesel, that features a few of the Diesel model girls live. This is different from the link that Diesel provides to a commercial live chat forum, that is called diesel.livetopcams.
On the Diesel Live Shows, which features actual Diesel models, Angelica performs occasionally.
I don't usually watch the Diesel Live Shows, but I caught one with Angelica recently. It was the first Angelica show I have watched. She had a guy with her (her boyfriend, I would assume), and they were going at it.
Completely free show. Not a private show. Just a regular live chat show.
The other Diesel girls strip completely, and masturbate, or talk/type with the audience. Completely free.
But this was the first time I saw a Diesel Live Show where the model had a guy with her and they were doing it.
Angelica looks as good in the Live Show as she does in her photosets and videos. And she is hot.
She has a live show scheduled for tomorrow, Friday, 02:00 am - 4:00 am, Eastern Standard time.
Sometimes the models don't show up for a live show. But if you are awake at this time, with access to the live show, you might want to tune in.
If you can't watch it live, Diesel (at the Diesel Access network, and also at Wow Girls site) has "Live Show Archive", where you can see a tape of past shows.
But in that case, I prefer to watch a regular taped studio video of the girl, because the production values, the definition, the lighting, the colors, etc., are better quality.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
