I've been a member of Met-Art several times, even had a few one-year memberships to them. Met-Art is probably my favorite site for porn on the internet. It was also the site of my first review at PU.
I've also been a member of MetModels (now called Erotic Beauty) and at least one of their other current sites.
But I never signed up for their promotional emails.
I'm currently a member of Erotic Beauty, so I do have access for that $8.00 offer to join Rylsky.
But at the moment, I'm already subscribed to too many other sites, that I don't really have time to visit them all. A waste of money.
But when I have the time, I will put Rylsky on my watchlist.
In the meantime, I followed your implied suggestion, and just now signed up for the Met-Art emails/special offers newsletter.
Yes, that's the main stunt cock I was thinking of.
Maybe it's just me, but lately he's been a less irritating in his videos, not as cocky and arrogant in the way he treats the models he has sex with.
But I still find it a relief that I am seeing other stunt cocks are now appearing in the new videos I am seeing at different sites.
Not that Timo and his bother/cousin (?) and a third guy have disappeared. They still appear in a huge amount of Eastern European porn videos.
I just got tired of seeing them so often. (Or maybe it's a tiny bit of jealousy, because they get to bonk so many absolutley gorgeous teens (along with a number of less-attractive teens, but geez, these guys are banging some of the prettiest, loveliest, gorgeous models I've ever seen, and getting paid to do it).
But as far as joining TMW, I would wait a while. As Pat mentioned, the recent updates have not, in my opinion, been as good as the standards of the past. Most sites go through a dry spell, of updates, or lack of pretty models, or other problems.
I'm still a member of TMW, but the recent updates are not that good. The models aren't, on average, that pretty. And the videos aren't really that exciting.
I'm hoping this is a temporary thing, and that the network will regain it's momentum, and start posting better videos again.
Membership fee out of line with the site contents.
Since this is a new site that just started a few months ago, and the site has only a small amount of content, they should really offer, until the site has grown a lot, a smaller subscription fee, for at least 6 months or more.
I know that the site operators want to cover expenses and all, but considering the relative lack of content versus competing sites, it's seems like a bad business decision to charge more for a monthly membership than mega-sites like Met-Art, MPL Studios, or Femjoy, which have years of back-logged content, gorgeous models, and a lower monthly price (about $20/month with PU discount).
I know some PU members have said the recent updates at Teen Mega World are below the standards that Teen Mega World had before.
But one thing that I think is an improvement, not just at Teen Mega World but at some other sites as well, is that we are seeing some new stunt cocks appearing in these videos. I am glad that the 3 main stunt cocks at Teen Mega World are appearing less often.
Instead of calling it offensive, I'd say the dirty talk is usually irritating, obviously mechanical, or staged. It indicates a lack of originality, and the phony way the models speak detracts from the value of the scene. That's only one of many advantages photos have over videos (except that with today's technology, photos can also have a soundtrack, which in porn, is not that big of an advantage).
"Stick it in, big boy. Oooohhhweeee! Fuck my tiny pussy with that giant cock!"
This poll made me determined to make some resolutions. Still searching for what I should resolve. And have little idea on how successful I will be in keeping those resolves.
Like I said, I found an email in my inbox saying I had joined the NALive site. This was immediately after I had joined the Naughty America site, because of the special $5.00 for 1 month promotion for Naughty America. So I assume the NALive join was directly related to the Naughty America membership, even though the email stating I was now a member of NALive did not mention Naughty America.
The NALive email specifically states that there is no charge to the NALive membership.
It also states that there are free, and paid, chats at that site. And that any pay chats/offerings are clearly marked.
I haven't really explored the NALive site yet. Not enough time, with the holidays, and the other pay sites I already belong to.
But I haven't been charged anything from the NALive site.
NALive is a cam site. But it's not entirely pay-to-play. The email states there is a lot of free chats you can watch. And there are also the chats you can pay for.
PU says NALive is a re-branded version of Streamate.com.
Streamate charges $15/month to join. But the NALive membership is free. If you go to the NALive site, you will see that it states (on one of their hot links): Join Free.
I didn't join through the NALive site. I never heard of NALive, before I got the email, stating that I was now a member of the NALive site.
Years ago, I used to watch the live cam shows at Met-Art, which were free. Many of the girls were friendly. But Met-Art stopped those shows, and later put out a--I don't know what you call it--live cam offering that was very different from its first effort, and I stopped watching them, or never really got started watching them, because they were very different from the original live chat shows.
I never got into the paid chat shows, because like you said, they can get very expensive.
Babes Network is a much better choice, because it has so much more material.
Some porn companies start or run different sites, even though there might be little difference in the style of the content, as a way of generating more sales, more money.
There is no difference in the style of 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn, which are run by the Diesel network. In fact, the photoset of a video shoot might appear at one site, and the accompanying video might appear at the other site. And in the past, but not currently, material that appeared at one site sometimes migrated to the other site.
Wow Girls, even though it's marketed separately from the Diesel network, has the same style of content, even the same models, as 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn. Any of the content at one of those 3 sites could have been posted at any of the other 2 sites.
It's purely a marketing decision, splitting the content between the 3 sites, as a way to make more money.
Great to hear from you, TheSquirrel. You haven't been hanging out here as much, lately. Hope you are keeping busy. Best wishes for the holidays and the New Year.
Pre-checked cross-sales are a nuisance, but many companies use them. That's why I try to double-check and triple-check any site I sign up for. And even then, I keep my fingers crossed I won't be charged for any extras.
I took advantage of the $5.00/30 day membership to Naughty America today.
I unchecked the pre-check membership to a bonus site.
But after logging in to the Naughty America site, I found an email in my Spam folder that says:
Congratulations you have activated your bonus membership to NALive.
There are NO monthly membership fees for accessing this new site! You will ONLY be charged if you access our clearly marked premium areas at the listed per min rate.
Please log on and enjoy the Free Guest Chats and talk to all our HOT MODELS who are waiting for you!
You can point your browser to http://www.nalive.com/ to use your membership. Your account information is shown below for reference purposes. Any purchases made on your account will be discreetly billed as Epoch.com.
Thanks for your business! If you have any questions regarding your bill please contact us at: epoch.com/billingsupport/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">https://epoch.com/billingsupport/
For information regarding the site, please read our Frequently Asked Questions
But the main preview page appears to be slightly misleading.
The main preview page shows 126 nice-sized thumbnails. And there is a popup over each thumbnail which says, "HD, Play Movie", "100% Full 1080p Resolution".
So you would normally think that there would be 126 videos, instead of 11+ videos.
Maybe the site is looking ahead, to what they will have in the future, instead of what they have currently.
But you would never know that the site only has 11+ videos, from the preview pages.
Are there any bonus sites that come with a membership? TBP doesn't list any bonus sites.
And if there is not a nice selection of bonus sites, then a site that is apparently this small might not be worth even a 1-month membership.
I chose "Iffy, with tinges of dismay". For a favorite softcore model, I'd usually prefer her to remain softcore. When girls get into hardcore, they seem to age faster.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Epoch is the billing company.
-Get a confirming email on signup.
-Currently a discounted price of $17.87/month.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I average 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Videos have date they were posted to the site.
-Nice selection of attractive teen models.
Cons:
-Most of the cons are basically minor.
-Thumbnails of other sites that are being advertised are present on the members pages.
-Need to un-check the pre-checked offer at signup.
-Large watermark bottom right side of videos.
-Most of the videos at the Rub A Teen site were previously posted at Tricky Masseur(TeenMegaWorld network). But Rub A Teen offers those videos in a higher definition.
The Team Skeet network focuses on teen hardcore videos. The video quality is high grade. The videos are mainly professionally shot. Good lighting, good camera work, good focus, etc.
You get a choice of several definitions for both streaming and downloading.
For streaming, you can choose low, medium or high definition.
For download, you can choose 1080p, 720p, or lower definitions. They also offer a file for iPods.
You also get photosets of many of the videos. The photos are good quality. Below what you will find at major photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios. But better than screen caps.
Minor nitpick: The site Innocent High features models that are supposed to be in high school. But because of the models' ages, it would be better to name them College Pros. None of the models I saw showed any innocence or hesitation about fucking and sucking their brains out.
The network has over 1,000 videos. The average runtime is between 20-30 minutes. Many of the models are real teens. Some models appear to be in their early twenties. There are a large number of very attractive young girls. So for a reduced price of $17.87/month with the PU/TBP discount, you gain access to a large number of hardcore teen videos that are professionally shot.
But the site management should definitely change the non-member pages for the updates, so that each non-member updates page accurately shows what content is available inside that site.
Otherwise, as you pointed out, someone who joins a single site, might feel cheated they are not getting what was advertised in the non-member's update page.
I am currently a member of both 18OnlyGirls and YoungLegalPorn.
When I look at the updates page for each site, I see two different pages.
There are no duplicate listings of the same content (video or photo shoot) at both sites.
I am writing about going inside the member's area, and looking at the update page for each site.
If you are not a member, or if you are looking outside the member's area for each site, and you look at the update page for each site in the non-member's area, you are correct: both sites, in the non-member updates page, show the same content (the same videos and photoshoots).
You could say that is false advertising.
I believe it's more likely a simple mistake (stupid, but understandable), where someone just put up on the internet the same page of contents (videos and photoshoots) to advertise both sites, even though those videos and photoshoots would not be available at both sites.
To be more explicit, if you are seeing a photo for a photoshoot or video at one site, and a matching photo at the other site, one photo is for a video, and the other photo is for the photoshoot of that video. They often distribute their content that way, instead of making sure that the video and matching photoshoot both appear at the same site.
Not a clone.
Both sites feature the same models.
And sometimes one site has a photoshoot of a video that is featured at the other site, and vice versa.
But basically content that appears at one site does not appear at the other site.
Years ago, I believe, some content did migrate from one site to the other. But that does not happen today.
Both sites are owned by the same company, and the content at both sites are similar in style and content, but not the same exact content.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
