Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : lk2fireone (0)  

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203)

Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1326-1350 of 2840 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1326
Visit Sasha Blonde

Sasha Blonde
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Sasha is cute blonde, with fun-loving personality.
-Credit card processor: CCBILL.
-Sasha sometines appears on the Diesel Girls Live, a live chat show. Not only is it free, but you get some nudity, often get to watch the girl
posing and masturbating. Some of the shows are worth watching.
-If you are a member of the Diesel network (instead of being signed up to just one site of the Diesel network), you can switch between sites by clicking on the hot link for a video or photoset at another site. You don't have to log in to each site separately.
-Recent update rate is one video or photoset per week.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Can stream or download videos.
-The content (videos and photosets) are dated.
Cons: -If the model Sasha does not appeal to you, the site will have little value.
-Some of the videos appear to be re-mastered from older material. So the quality doesn't match what you would expect from the definition. The video can be poorly framed, sometimes out of focus, poorly lighted, like an amateur video that's poorly shot.
-No model bio. Even though this is a single-model site, and Sasha appears in every video and photoset I saw, you would like to see more of Sasha's personality come through. Instead, you get a collection of her videos and photosets, but not much feeling.
Bottom Line: The main sites in the Diesel network are 18OnlyGirls and YoungLegalPorn.
But there are other sites in the network worth viewing. IvanaFukalot, SkinnySuperGirl, AliceWonderBang, NatashaShy, VikaNymph, SashaBlonde, and BeataPorn are sites with recent updates.

SashaBlonde is a cute skinny blonde. She's been doing porn starting in 2005, but she still looks like a young teen. She's featured at Metart, MetModels, Femjoy, the Diesel network, and other sites.

If you have a network pass at Diesel, Sasha has a lot of content at 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn, in addition to the SashaBlonde and
SashaFucksDasha sites that feature Sasha.

Number of videos: 431+
Number of photosets: 528+

Most videos have several download options:
WMV 1080p
MP4 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p

Videos run from 4 to 20 minutes.
Photosets have from 40 to 80 photos per set.

Most photosets have 2 zip file options. 1000 px definition, and an original definition, which is a higher definition size.

Some photosets have 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px, plus an original size px.

You get this site if you sign up for the entire Diesel network. But unless you are a strong Sasha fan, it's probably not worth subscribing to this site by itself.

I was not impressed by the videos and photosets at this site, even though Sasha is a cute model.

08-21-12  02:32am

Replies (6)
Reply
1327
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

I mentioned in my site review that the videos would be better without the music.

I believe a few porn models are able to transition to fashion modelling, but it's pretty rare.

The Teen Mega World network has a boy-girl-girl site, firstbgg. It only has 25 videos, and is no longer updating. And the videos are presented at a slightly lower quality than at Diesel or X-art.

But if you belong to the Teen Mega World network, which has a ton of hardcore teen videos, their boy-girl-girl site is worth checking out.


08-20-12  05:46pm

Comment
1328
Visit Red City Nudes

Red City Nudes
(0)

Does this site still exist?

You click on redcitynudes link at PU/TBP and it directs you to 18magazine.

You do a google search, and the links lead to 18magazine.

08-20-12  11:55am

Replies (0)
Reply
1329
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

I think Joymii and Sexart are going for a similar "arty" erotic style. But I don't think any of those sites puts much emphasis on anal.

08-19-12  06:11pm

Comment
1330
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)

$14.99 signup special.

Apparently Metart is having a signup special.

Click on PU/TBP link, or just go to Metart signup page, and you see a price of $14.99 for 30 days, recurring at $29.99 every 30 days.

08-19-12  11:08am

Replies (1)
Reply
1331
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of elephant's Comment

Glad you like it so far.
For soft hardcore, or erotic porn. I think it's one of the better sites available.
And many of the models are drop-dead gorgeous.


08-19-12  10:18am

Reply
1332
N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

I think graymane speaks for at least some of us elder PU members.

08-18-12  09:48pm

Reply
1333
N/A Reply of pornwatcher's Poll

Maybe I'm getting jaded, but fellatio and cunnilingus often appear boring.

08-16-12  03:38am

Reply
1334
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I tried getting a refund on a pre-checked cross-sale site. But didn't get one.

08-14-12  03:18pm

Reply
1335
N/A Reply of tangub's Reply

What tangub said. It's a good thing I like skinny white chicks. Japanese models are some of the most beautiful in the world, but I don't like the mosaic blur.

08-10-12  05:52am

Reply
1336
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Claypaws's Reply

"Have you ever seen any exif data in a MET set?"

I'm not technically inclined.

I look at a photo (or video) and see whether I enjoy it or not. I pay very little attention to the technical specifications, although I do realize they can have an impact on my enjoyment.

I usually like photos that are clear and in focus. The same with videos.


08-09-12  06:14pm

Reply
1337
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Claypaws's Reply

I was merely trying to make a comment (and joke) that a few models barely seem to age over a period of 5 years or more. Most models do age quite noticeably once they are no longer teenagers.

But your explanation of a photographer shooting multiple sets of a particular model and then those sets being posted over a long period of time seems reasonable.

Occasionally I will find a new set of a model I like, and realize it was photographed years ago, because the model appears so much like she did when she was just starting out. The posting date of the set might be recent, but the set was photographed much earlier. That is different from when a site re-dates a set because they are trying to show they are posting new content, which is a lie.

When sites give a content date, that should normally mean the date the content was first posted at that site.

But even here, it's not always simple. Because some sites, when they give an updated version of some content, because it's in higher resolution or some other form of improved version, will re-date that content to the date it's currently posted.

I feel like a dog chasing its own tail.

I admire your way with words. Clear and to the point.


08-09-12  06:05pm

Reply
1338
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
Reply of tangub's Reply

Thanks for the fast response.

I posted a comment on All Gravure a couple of years ago. I wasn't a member, but from looking at the preview pages, and knowing something about some of their featured models, a lot of the pictures would be non-nude, because those models are non-nude models. They are idols, which in Japan means they have a fan base.

And a lot of the photos are non-exclusive. Apparently, this site collected photos from photo-books of Japanese models, and posted the photos at this site.


08-09-12  09:35am

Comment
1339
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)

Is Met-art using robots or clones as models?

I've been watching the model named Eufrat, also known as Becki, Euphrates, Jana Hall, Jana P., Jana Potysova, Janette, Juliette, Lenka, Marina, Monique, Patty Glower, Ragan, Tricia, Jana Potyšová.

She's been modelling at least seven years.

You compare her earliest sets to her more recent ones, and you begin to realize she's not aging like a natural human should.

Are Met-art and other porn sites saving money by using robots or androids, instead of giving us the real deal?

08-09-12  09:17am

Replies (11)
Reply
1340
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
Reply of tangub's Reply

What Japanese site or sites do you think are the best value?

I think Japanese models are some of the most beautiful in the world.

And their photography is first class.

But I don't really appreciate the mosaic blurring in their videos.


08-09-12  08:00am

Reply
1341
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
Reply of tangub's Reply

You're right.

I was being very approximate.

Several years ago I used to buy photo-books from Amazon.co.jp.

At that time, the rate was very close to 100 Japanese yen per US dollar.


08-09-12  07:54am

Reply
1342
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
Reply of op9527's Review

Interesting review. Your wife seems to sum up the site quite well: "Too little for too much time and money"

08-09-12  07:25am

Comment
1343
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)

Error in pricing.

The prices in US dollars are listed wrong at PU/TBP.

The prices shown are:

Monthly: $1980.00 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $3800.00 (2 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $5600.00 (3 months, recurring)


I believe the prices should be divided by 100:

Monthly: $19.80 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $38.00 (2 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $56.00 (3 months, recurring)

08-09-12  07:19am

Replies (6)
Reply
1344
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Mostly I go for the slender East European teen models. But normal-sized is good, too. Even the voluptuous. But I don't usually prefer models that are seriously overweight.

08-08-12  03:20pm

Reply
1345
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)
Reply of Claypaws's Review

Excellent or superb review (both adjectives apply).

Can I hire you to ghost write my reviews in the future?


08-06-12  04:06pm

Reply
1346
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I don't pay a lot of attention to the height of a model.
Maybe it would be more important if there was real-life interaction. But even then, unless the model was under 2 feet tall, or over 10 feet tall, I don't think height would matter very much.


08-06-12  07:20am

Reply
1347
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

English is my native language. But the older I get, the more I struggle with it.

08-04-12  10:28pm

Comment
1348
Visit Exclusive Teen Porn

Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)

Updated preview pages.

Just noticed that site preview pages were updated. Not only does this give fresh look, but also gives much more information about the site contents, for model's content, videos, and photosets.

08-03-12  02:42am

Replies (1)
Comment
1349
Visit In Focus Girls

In Focus Girls
(0)

Preview page needs updating.

This site has gotten some positive reviews over the years.

But the preview page is old and needs to look more attractive, as well as giving a better preview of the site contents.

08-02-12  06:42pm

Replies (1)
Reply
1350
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Dreams. Or fantasy. I kinda doubt I would have the chance.

08-02-12  06:10pm


Shown : 1326-1350 of 2840 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.56 seconds.