Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-In my opinion, the finest softcore glamour site on the internet.
-The site is best of breed. For softcore teen photos. No other site comes close in terms of number of sets, frequency of updates. MPL Studios and Femjoy and some other sites are great, but MetArt is number one.
-Currently, MetArt has a PU discount of $9.99 for the first month, recurring at $19.99/month.
This is one of the lowest prices I seen for MetArt at $9.99 for the first month.
-The largest catalog of softcore glamour photo sets on the Internet. See bottom line for the current statistics.
-A large number of contributing photographers. So you get a variety of approaches. Not all sets will appeal to any one person, but if you are into softcore teen photos, this site should have plenty of content that will satisfy your needs.
I paid for a lifetime membership several years back, because I was tired of paying for monthly and yearly memberships. It was the first porn site I paid for a lifetime membership.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-A large catalog of models: some of the cutest or most attractive teens on the planet.
However, you can also find a huge number of attractive teens at competing sites such as MPL Studios or Femjoy or other glamour style sites.
-Secure login and member pages: https.
-Customer service is 24/7. One of the finest customer services of any porn site I've ever dealt with.
The reps are friendly and helpful.
CONS -The cons are stricly minor.
-The sheer size of the site: it's the largest softcore teen site on the internet. You stare at thousands of photos of gorgeous girls, and your brain starts to shut down. You can't appreciate how lovely these girls are. It's human nature, or human psychology.
-Site is strictly for soft, softcore teen. No hardcore action.
-Almost all models are white. Very little variation in race, or age. Most models start at around 18, and some can continue shooting into the late 20s. But no older models in upper 30s or above.
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. But this is standard for porn sites.
-The MetArt network used to have a system where if you were a member of one of their sites, you had access to membership plans to join most of the other sites for a discounted price of around $10/month. But they dropped that system years ago.
-MetArt used to have a live cam show offering where some MetArt models or other models would put on free shows. The models also offered private shows, but the free shows lasted 30 minutes or more, and the girls were friendly. There wasn't a lot of nudity in those shows, but it gave you a chance to interact with the models. They dropped that system many years ago, and went with a more commercial type cam show, where the performers and the sytem itself encourages the viewer to pay: These shows, both public and private, can become very expensive. It can be cheaper to go to a strip club and watch the strippers versus watching the modern live cam show.
BOTTOM LINE (start of):
On 2017-01-25, the stats are as follows:
Models: 3,285
Galleries: 16,678
Videos: 1,362
Contributing photographers: 272
On 2018-10-30, the stats are as follows:
Models: 3,548
Galleries: 19,089
Videos: 1,544
Contributing photographers: 283
Models are 18-30 years old.
Mostly Eastern European.
Most of the models start out at around 18, but many continue to be shot at MetArt for years, so you have some models that started at 18 that are still shooting at 30.
Some models have over 50 sets at MetArt.
Galleries: 19,089
Galleries include indoor and outoor locations.
The technical quality of the galleries is usually outstanding.
Videos: 1,544
Most videos are a waste of time.
You have beautiful girls, getting naked, and the Wow factor is zero: almost all videos are boring.
A lot of time and money are spent making these videos: I don't know how photo sets of a model can be erotic or beautiful, while a video of the same model is almost always boring, but MetArt has perfected the Art of Making Boring Videos of beautiful naked women.
I have found a few videos that were slightly interesting: Must have been a mistake on MetArt's part, because I've stopped watching their videos.
Also, the background music on these videos is often jarring.
If you're going to watch a video, I recommend turning off the sound.
Contributing photographers: 283
Instead of one or a few photographers contributing to the site, you have access to almost 300 professional photographers of erotic beauty.
I'm giving the site a score of 95.
The site is for soft, softcore teen porn fanatics.
As such, it's such a fantasic site, for a low price, that it deserves a score of 95 or even higher.
Not all sets or photographic styles will appeal to everyone, but you have access to:
-A huge backlog of galleries of teen models.
-A huge number of attractive models: Some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-A huge number of daily updates: 4 updates daily, except the first day of the month is 6 updates.
-A very low membership price: PU discounted membership is $19.99/recurring monthly. There is currently a PU discounted price of $9.99 for the first month.
If you do a google search, you can sometimes find a discounted price under $10.00 for the first month.
One problem with such a large mega-site: you become bored with physical beauty. You have such a catalog of beutiful girls, thousands of galleries, that you just don't appreciate what you have.
That's human nature.
Except some of the models are freaking hot; other models are freaking cute.
Unless you are dead inside, there should be plenty of sets that will appeal to you.
But if you want hardcore, MetArt is strictly soft, softcore.
In my opinion, MetArt is the finest softcore site on the internet.
It deserves a score in the high 90s.
The only major flaw are the boring videos. But I've never found a good site for softcore videos.
I posted this same message for your comment on the Team Skeet site.
Team Skeet sometimes has problems.
Some PU members complain of poor connection speeds.
But in the past, PU members have written that Team Skeet customer service was friendly and helpful.
So maybe you could contact them that you are having login problems, and would they help?
You should, at least, get some free extended membership days added to your account, because of login problems. Say you deserve the free days because the site would not let you in.
I'm not a Team Skeet member currently, don't work for them, am not a shill.
(Although, if I stick up for a site, I'm sometimes accused of being a liar or a shill.)
Team Skeet sometimes has problems.
Some PU members complain of poor connection speeds.
But in the past, PU members have written that Team Skeet customer service was friendly and helpful.
So maybe you could contact them that you are having login problems, and would they help?
You should, at least, get some free extended membership days added to your account, because of login problems. Say you deserve the free days because the site would not let you in.
I'm not a Team Skeet member currently, don't work for them, am not a shill.
(Although, if I stick up for a site, I'm sometimes accused of being a liar or a shill.)
What sites do you recommend for French and German porn?
And are they in English, or in their native language?
The site, I mean, not the videos (not what the models speak in their videos).
Thanks in advance.
I'd check out the sites, if they are in English (with instructions for English-speaking people).
Less important is what the models say in their videos.
For a lot of porn, what the actors/models are saying has very little value or meaning.
The action is the thing.
However, there are some scenes where the dialogue does add meaning to the sex.
That's the minority of cases.
In those scenes, it can make an impact.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Errotica Archives is part of the MetArt network.
-This basically means you get a first-class site with all the photo glamour trimmings:
-Excellent customer support: fast to respond, helpful responses.
-24/7 customer support.
-Good site navigation: easy to navigate.
-Regular updates:
-One photo set per day.
-Averages one new video per week.
-The site features high-grade glamour models. The style is softcore erotic.
-You can stream videos online in your choice of 1080p, 720p, 480p, or mobile.
-You can also download the videos in 1080p, 480p, or mobile.
-The photo sets have three choices of high, medium or low definition for viewing online or downloading in a zip file.
-There are no limits for streaming or downloading.
-The quality (attractiveness) of the models is superb.
-Site uses https for login and member pages.
Cons:
-I believe the cons are basically minor. The site deserves a high score.
-Limited model information.
-Gorgeous models. But little variation in age or race. Teens to middle twenties (so no older models represented). Almost all models are white.
-Very softcore site. No hardcore. This will only appeal to teen softcore addicts.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for most porn sites, however.
Bottom Line:
The MetArt site is the softest of softcore teen sites. Errotica Archives tries a slightly more errotic apprach than MetArt, but still very soft softcore.
No toys. Just a hint of self touching. You're viewing gorgeous girls who either strip or start naked, and they are just lovely.
However, this is strictly softcore.
No hardcore action.
So if your tastes run to softcore, this site is worth visiting.
But if you want hardcore sex, then the site will disappoint.
Most of the photo sets are solo model photo shoots.
Just lovely girls displaying their charms.
I came across a very low membership offer of $4.99 for the first month.
And since the day's model was Jerricka, a small, absolutely adorable young teen, I joined immediately.
$4.99 for a month's membership, and the chance to enjoy a great site.
Great price. Great site filled with lovely models.
If you are a fan of softcore errotica, this is a fantastic deal.
The site has been around since 2004, so there is a large catalog of models and photo sets.
The main MetArt site has 4 updates per day (except on the first day of each month, when it has 6 updates).
So the main MetArt site has a huge catalog of photo sets and videos that far surpass Errotica Archives in quantity.
Except that if you haven't been a member of Errotica Archives before, and if you are a fan of softcore teens, then, with a PU discounted price, the site is definitely worth joining to see what it has to offer.
And if you can find one of the special introductory offers that is under $10 for the first month, that would be an even better offer for a quality softcore teen site.
I'm giving the site a score of 90.
That's because:
-The quality of the teen models is outstanding.
-The large number of teen models.
-The quality of the photo sets is outstanding.
-The quality of the videos is outstanding.
-The site is easy to use. Navigation is simple. Search is easy.
-A large catalog of teen models in photo sets and videos.
However, you have to be a fan of softcore teen.
There is no hardcore action.
And the site, although it features a lot of nudity, does not feature the explicit photography that some PU members prefer. This is strictly a very soft, softcore teen site.
Got an email for Teen Dreams. $9.95 for first month.
This is mainly a photo site.
But also has videos.
Many years since I was a member.
But I'm tempted.
This was a great site years ago,
A lot of really cute teen models.
This isn't porn, but the movie, Purple Rain (1984), with Prince, has that emotional glamcore approach.
You might watch it with your wife as a date-movie.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Teen Mega World network.
Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites.
There are no premium sites that require an extra payment.
-Teen Mega World is probably my favorite teen hardcore porn site for bread-and-butter sex. They don't glamorize the models, but the girls are naturally attractive, and some of them are real beauties.
Why is Teen Mega World (TMW) one of my favorite porn networks?:
-The quality of the models. Teens that are naturally attractive to very attractive.
-The quality of the videos and photosets have improved massively over the last few years:The network is spending time and money for more expensive sets, higher production values, better costumes, better lighting (which is part of the higher production values), better sound control, etc.
-They've been offering 4K definition the last couple of years, as well as lower definition videos. I stick with the 540p and 720p videos, because they look good on my 27" monitor,
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
The higher definitions are just wasted on my monitors and waste hard disk space to store.
-The also have a virtual reality site, started a couple of years ago.
I don't have any virtual reality computer equipment, so I watch the video on regular monitor, as a "normal" video.
-The network covers many different teen porn niches: creampie, lesbian, squirting, threesome, masturbation, etc.
CONS (START OF):
-I've said it before: if you join the Teen Mega World network, join through the Teen Mega World site itself: if you join through any of the other sites in the network, your search function is limited to results from the join site, even when you switch to another site in the network. Which makes searching and viewing the content of a model a real chore.
-They have over 30 sites. Most of them are no longer updating. The ones that do update average about 1 new video and photoset per month.
However, the network has a daily update of 1 new video and photoset.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The login and member pages are not secure (non https).
-Sometimes they require a captcha to login.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
Site theme: a boy and girl are studying together. The boy is the tutor. The girl is attracted to the boy. Or the boy is attracted to the girl. Or he's just horny.
Not a lot of plot. Or motivation. This is basically bread-and-butter teen sex. Except the couple is supposed to start off studying. As if that makes any difference.
The videos are watchable because the boy and the girl are teens. The girls are usually cute. Some are really cute.
I just wish I had met some of these cute girls when I was in high school.
But I was a slow learner, didn't meet any of these girls until I hit college.
The site is not one of my favorites in the Teen Mega World network. Tricky Masseur is probably my favorite. The massage theme, where a male masseur gives a teen girl a massage that turns sensual, and they they fuck, can be believable and erotic and hot. And some of these girls are really hot.
The network has over 1,300 models. Almost all of them are real teens.
And many range from cute to really cute.
The attractive level of the teens is as high as any teen site.
The girls are not made to look glamourous, but their natural attractiveness shines through.
And they enjoy sex. If not, they are putting on a very good show.
Giving the site a score of 90.
That is because of network access.
If you had to score the site by itself, without network access, it would be maybe 78,
not worth joining because there would be better values for your money.
Except it's a site in the Teen Mega World network, which means you get access to the entire network.
That's one reason I avoid most trials.
I also try to make sure that I avoid pre-checked trials on signup.
Because a pre-checked trial will turn into a very expensive membership unless you cancel in time.
But you can try to have your full access membership cancelled, with a refund, depending on the payment processor that was used.
If that doesn't work, you can dispute the payment with your credit card company, if you think the charge was fraudulent.
Up to you.
But with a PU discount, you pay $20 for the first month, recurring at $50/month.
There have been negative comments about the site, so it's probably not worth paying $50/month for the site.
There are many better sites that cost far less.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Teen Mega World network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites. There are no premium sites that cost extra.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Over 2,000 Eastern European teen models that are mainly attractive to extremely attractive.
This is not a glamor network, the girls are not made up with make-up or costumes to appear glamourous, but their natural beauty makes the quality of the models as good as any teen hardcore site.
And the girls appear to enjoy having sex: it's not crude, or excessively violent: the girls love getting pounded--sort of bread and butter, but with a happy flavor.
-For a low price with a PU discount, $14.95/month, you get access to thousands of hardcore teen videos and photosets.
-Each video has an accompanying photoset. The photosets are screencaps from the video, but the quality of the photosets has improved massively over the last few years.
Cons:
-If you want to join this network or this site, join through the Teen Mega World site.
Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites.
But if you join through any site except the Teen Mega World site, your search results are limited to the site you joined through. A Teen Mega World membership gives you search results for the entire network.
So, if you join through any site other than the Teen Mega World network, it will be difficult and time-consuming to search for a model's content.
And once you find her content, it will be difficult to access that content.
Much faster and easier to search through Teen Mega World site.
I joined through Teen Sex Movs site, but the Teen Mega World support was kind enough to give me a direct membership to Teen Mega World, and therefore easier searches and faster navigation to the model content.
-FXBilling is the default billing processor. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, names I am more familiar with.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
But I've been a member of the network many times, and never had a problem with any of its billing agents (which seem to vary a lot).
--Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. But this is standard for most porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is anal sex.
-The network updates daily. The Anal Beauty site averages one video and photoset per month.
-The video definition selection is from 404p up to 2160p (Ultra High Definiton).
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Simple, easy to use, fast software for viewing slideshow of a photoset online.
Again, I want to emphasize that you should join through the Teen Mega World site directly, because it makes searching and viewing the content so much easier.
The site and network should do a software update to make the search cover the entire network, instead of the site you join through. Which also makes viewing the contents of each model so much easier.
You have over 30 separate sites. Most of the sites do not update. However, the network has spent a lot of time and money and effort to update the network, with more expensive sets, better lighting and better visual quality for the videos and photosets. As well as offering the latest fads in porn: they started offering 4K UHD videos around 2015, and even have one site devoted to that.
They started a VR site in 2016.
Based on the low price ($14.95/month with PU discount), the huge amount of good quality hardcore teen videos covering many different niches, and the good navigation (if you remember to join through the Teen Mega World site, and not through one of the satellite sites), I'm giving the site a score of 90. That is because you get access to the entire Teen Mega World network when you join any one of its member sites.
But, again, I wish they would update the search function, so that joining through any one of the sites gives you a search that covers the entire network. Because it's a real hassle if you join one of the member sites to search and navigate to a model's contents.
You write: "No problems using my download manager."
So: what is your browser (and is it the newest version, or an older version)?
And what is your download manager?
The name.
Is it free?
I used DownThemAll for many years, but it's not compatible with recent versions of Firefox.
I've used Firefox for many years. Maybe I should try another browser, but familiarity, ease of use, etc. keeps me with Firefox.
They have been working on an updated DownThemAll that will work with the new Firefox, but it's already been at least a couple of years they've been saying that.
And I don't want to run an older version of Firefox, because I'm afraid of viruses, malware, etc.
Even though I also run the Norton Security suite.
Thanks in advance.
My memory is poor. Did I already ask you this previously?
I seem to remember that you are running an older version of Firefox, and that's why you can use DownThemAll.
Before I used the VPN, that page showed my city and ISP.
Now, after opening the VPN automatically, my city and ISP are no longer shown.
So I guess the VPN is working.
Again, many thanks for recommending Nord VPN as an easy to use, low-cost VPN.
It will take me a while to learn to use it, because it seems to have a lot of bells and whistles.
But for now, all I want is some basic protection.
I don't really need a lot of the bells and whistles, because I mainly use my PCs at home, not at public WiFi places.
But thanks for taking the time to advise on a good VPN (price and reliability and ease of use), and links to test it out.
@jook,
I just signed up with NordVPN.
Wish me luck.
Cause I'm a newbie, have no idea how to use it.
LOL.
(I opened the app, but there aren't any bright flashing lights to tell me I am now invisible and protected, although I did sign in with email and password.)
I also read in one of the Google Play reviews, after signing up:
MelDan
September 15, 2018
NordVPN is probably one of the best easy to use VPN service providers. It generally is fast and effective with very few issues. The only small issue I have is some sites will absolutely not load up while the VPN is active. I got a special price last year for what worked out to be only around $1 a mo...
---------------
---------------
I wish I had seen that special price.
Well, I will keep looking.
But I paid $95.75 for 2 years, so I don't feel terrible.
As long as I can get some use out of it.
Or somehow, see that I am protected.
I'm planning on using the VPN you recommended, but haven't signed up yet.
I'm over 70, and my mind can lose track of details, or mis-remember.
I've used VLC media player for many years.
I said my FLV player would not work with these videos, but that was a mistake:
It's my VLC media player that will not play these videos.
The FLV player program is on my computer.
Why it's on my computer I don't remember, because I don't remember ever using it.
VLC media player, and the Windows Media Player (part of the Windows system from Microsoft) are the 2 programs I use to play videos.
So I'm correcting that error in my review: changing FLC player to VLC media player.
Thanks for pointing that out. And for taking the time to read my review.
But the problem of playing the videos might be because I'm making a mistake when I try to download the video file.
I used to use Down Them All download manager, which does not work with Windows 10.
And trying to download a file manually, which should be easy, from this network sometimes gives me an empty file (the filename is correct, for the video download, but the file itself is empty.).
I did not have any of these problems the when I joined the network a couple of years ago, when streaming the videos, or downloading them (because it was easy to download with Down Them All).
The main reason I joined the network was because I came across a very low-priced membership offer, and thought it was a good value.
Not expecting that I would have problems with streaming the videos, the poor online player for the photos, or problems with downloading and playing the videos because the streaming player does not work very well.
I have a 100 Mbps connection to the Internet, so I should be able to stream videos with no problems.
But at this network, I do have problems streaming a video: if I pause the video, I have to re-start it from the beginning. I can't fast forward or skip forward. The video controls (volume, etc.) sometimes disappear if I pause or try to fast forward.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Secure page for choosing login details.
-Secure member pages (https).
-Sometimes a great discount for membership price.
-Over 6,500 exclusive videos.
-Access to 15+ sites.
-Premium HD quality at its network.
-No captcha required for login.
-Excelllent search. Searches the entire network for a model's content, not just the site you are currently logged into.
-Multiple choices for both streaming and downloading.
-Don't have to pay extra for downloading.
-Videos have a trailer, to give you a preview.
-Nice model page, with good-sized thumbnail of the model, plus hot links to her network content.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for porn sites.
-Icons to control the video sometimes disappear (Play, pause, volume control can be hard to find).
-Need a fast internet connection to stream videos, or they can stutter or stop. My connection is fine for most other paysites, but not at this network.
-The videos have a codec that my software (including VLC media player) won't play. This is the first network I've found this problem.
-I've had problems with downloading videos.
-Ads for other paysites on the member pages.
-Once a video starts to stream, you can't do a partial rewind or fast forward: you have to re-start the video from the start. If you pause the video, you have to reload the page and restart the video from the beginning.
-The photo sets are poor-quality screencaps. Most competing paysites have better screencaps.
-The audio portion of a video sometimes cuts out during online streaming.
Bottom Line:
The videos are plot-based: You have a setup for the sex, to give meaning to the sex.
Navigation is good. The model pages have nice-sized thumbnails of the model, with hot links to her content at the network.
Most videos come with a trailer to give you a fast pre-view of the video.
Mot videos come with a photoset, but the photos are poor quality screencaps, and even if the model is attractive, the photo sets are not worth collecting.
Even though the photos in a set are poor quality screencaps, the file size of each photo can be 6 to 8 MB, which is huge. They are using a poor codec for the photos.
Sites like MetArt have high-quality photos. MetArt low definition file size for a photo is 100 KB or less. MetArt high definition file size for a photo is 200 KB or less.
But New Sensations photos, which are poor-quality screencaps, are 30 to 60 times the size of MetArt high quality photos.
I need a software program that will play the downloaded videos, because I have problems streaming the videos.
I was a previous member back in December 2016, and did not have any of my current problems with streaming or downloading the videos, or playing them once downloaded.
One of the main advantages of New Sensations is they give you a storyline that leads up to the sex, to make the sex more meaningful. And some of the videos can be hot.
For example:
From the Tabu Tales site: Raylin Ann: Deep Secret Desires Become Reality For Raylin: Posted 11/18/2016.
Raylin has been keeping her longtime crush and deep sexual desires hidden from her step brother Karlo. One massage that finally went too far opened loose her sexual awakening and her shorts. Not even a phone call from their mother could distract her from sucking on his cock, she was quickly spread wide and fucking her way from fantasy to reality and swallowing it all up.
Starring: Karlo Karrera, Raylin Ann
So you get the incest of step siblings, with the additional naughtiness of girl talking to her mother while she is seduced and fucked by her step brother.
Bottom line:
If you're lucky enough to get one of their special discounted memberships, you get a huge amount of hardcore porn covering many different niches. The video quality is good. And the price can be low.
Making this a very worthwhile join.
But technical issues (playback problems, poor quality photo sets, a clunky online player for the photosets) detract from the value of the network.
If you're an expert with Photo Shop, maybe you can transfer some of the hair on the model's head to where you would rather see it: armpits, legs, crotch, buttocks.
I thought you grew up after the hairy phase of the 1970s and maybe the 1980s had passed.
So it must be an esthetic choice that you prefer the ultra-heavy hair from that period, rather than nostalgia.
I admit that I often grow tired of the bald-faced pussy, because I was in my prime when women still had pubic hair.
But maybe the fashion will turn once more, while I'm still alive to enjoy it.
Some of my favorite models were from the pages of Playboy and Penthouse from the 1970s. They were not only gorgeous, but the pubic hair gave them an element of mystery and eroticism that the bald-faced look does not have.
Nice to see you submitting another review.
This is an excellent review.
The major con for this site is the high price.
If you are into hairy models, the MetArt network offers a LoveHairy.com site.
This is mainly hairy sets that were previously posted on one of the other MetArt sites.
I doubt that you have subscribed to most of the MetArt network sites recently.
So almost all of the content at Love Hairy should be new for you.
The update rate is irregular, not daily. More like once a week.
The main attraction of Love Hairy is the low price:
$7.99 monthly recurring.
But you can cancel the first month, if you don't want the sub to continue.
Or $60/year, if you are willing to pay for a long term sub.
Either way, this is a very low-priced site with excellent content:
Quality, high grade photography, lovely models, excellent customer support.
I did a PU review of the site on 09-24-17, that might give a few more details, if the site interests you.
The preview pages are a good way to see the quality of the models, and to give you an idea of the type of photography the site offers. This is a softcore glamour photo site. Although they do have a few videos, it's mainly photo sets.
I'm not a lawyer, but I always assumed it was illegal to trade downloaded videos of copyrighted material.
I don't know how often that law is enforced.
Actually, I think it's illegal to photocopy copyrighted books, but most students do it all the time.
Again, I don't know how often that law is enforced.
Probably not often, but just like jaywalking, it's against the law.
And of course, when you rent a DVD of a movie, there is an FBI warning that copying the DVD is illegal, with a possible $250,000 fine if you are caught.
Politicians and businessmen can steal millions of dollars, or hundreds of millions of dollars, and pay less fines than $250,000 if they are caught.
But copy a DVD of a movie, and they can fine you $250,000, plus prison time, I think.
Got to admire the law: punish the weak with a sledgehammer, but punish a politician or businessman with a slap on the wrist for stealing millions.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
