REVIEW CONTINUED:
But the sex is not excessively rough or violent.
The site is small (only 74 videos currently).
But you get access to a massive amount of hardcore teen videos.
All of the models are young, many are attractive to very attractive.
A lot the videos can be hot: these are young teens who enjoy getting fucked (or they certainly seem to give that impression).
Because of the low price, and the large contents of the network, and the level of attractiveness of the models, I think the network is definitely worth joining: it's one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
Giving the site a score of 90, because of the network access.
If the site was a stand-alone site, the score would be much lower.
I'm giving a high score, in spite of the navigation issues.
The models are attractive young teens, and some of the scenes can be erotic. Not artistic, but hot: because the models really seem to be getting off.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount $14.95/month.
-Part of the Teen Mega World network. You get access to 33 sites covering many teen niches.
There are no premium sites requiring an extra payment.
-Videos are offered in resolutions from 404p through 2160p (UHD).
-Update rate is one or two videos per month. But the network updates one video per day.
-No download limits. No limits on streaming.
-There is a photoset for each video. I assume they use a professional software program to make screenshots from the video, and the screenshots are high quality: the photos are centered, clear and crisp, and worth collecting: as opposed to years ago, when the photosets were low-quality screenshots that were poorly lighted, often out of focus, and a waste to collect.
Part of what makes the photosets worth collecting is the attractiveness of the models: the models are late teens, and often range from cute to some really attractive girls.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-They eliminated the captcha needed to enter the site; this was a recent experiment, and I'm glad they dropped it; because it made logging in to the member area more difficult, because the captchas they used were hard to solve correctly.
--Vendo is the default biller I used. I used to prefer CCBill or Epoch, since they are reliable and easy to use, but I've used Vendo many times and never had a problem with them.
Actually, Vendo has a website that makes cancelling your sub easy. And it shows your payment details, etc. So Vendo is, in my opinion, as good as CCBill and Epoch.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for most porn sites.
-Login page is non-secure. Member pages are non-secure (no https).
-Navigation could be improved. One of the site/network updates done a few years ago made navigating the site and network harder: They now use a gateway system, where you only gain partial access to the sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
This makes updating the network and site easier for the site software engineers, but harder for the customer to examine the site contents.
-You need a large and expensive monitor to get the benefit a 2160p videos. I have a 27" inch monitor, and the 540p or 720p resolutions are fine for me: I can't tell any difference for the higher resolutions, and because of the massive increase in file size for the higher resolutions, I download and keep the 540p or 720p files.
-The search is poor.
If you joined through one of the sites that was not TMW, the search in the members area only returns content from the site you joined: even when you do a partial transfer to another site, the search still returns content from the join site.
There is a work-around: from the public pages, if you open the TMW site public page, you can do a search for a model's content, and the search will return all her videos from the network. That works for the TMW site. If you open one of the public member sites, the search will only search for content at that specific site.
So you can find the network content for each model.
However, to access that content, you need to login to your join page, and then do a partial transfer to the site you want to view, and then manually scroll through the pages to find her content (because you can't use the search to find her content at that site).
A very slow and laborious way to find the contents of a model at the network.
The best solution is to join through the Teen Mega World site itself. Then you search will cover the entire network, so finding the content, and accessing the content (viewing or downloading), is so much easier.
BOTTOM LINE(start of):
The site theme is offering videos in 4K resolution (Ultra HD resolution).
The videos are also offered in lower resolutions of 405p through 1080p.
The different resolutions are offered for both downloading and streaming.
This is a small site:
The site currently has 74 videos and 74 matching photosets.
A slow update rate (1 or 2 new videos per month) means the site will grow slowly.
But: you have access to the entire Teen Mega World network, which as 33 sites currently.
So you have access to sites covering many different teen niches: massage, squirting, virtual reality, anal, creampie, boy-girl-girl, dirty doctor, dirty coach, female masturbation, lesbian, old-and-young, etc.
The network stats: 2018-08-30
videos 5085.
Over 5,000 photo sets (normally one photo set for each accompanying video).
Total photos 896,983.
Porn models 1383.
Total content: 8542.8 Gigs.
Hard drive prices keep dropping, but it's a waste of file space for me to keep video resolutions above 540p or 720p because I can't see any improvement of picture quality on my monitors.
Maybe it's my eyesight (I'm over 70 year old), or the monitors (my largest monitor is 27").
A recent video posted 2018-08-18, has a runtime of 32 minutes 02 seconds:
The file sizes for the different resolutions are:
MP4 404p 531 MB
MP4 540p 875 MB
MP4 720p 1.19 GB
MP4 1080p 2.31 GB
MP4 2160p 4.32 GB
Actually, the Teen Mega World network (TMW, for short) has been posting 2160p video updates at whatever sites have updates for years now: they started the Beauty 4K site when Ultra High Definition was just becoming popular, as a way of featuring how modern and up-to-date the network was: but the network offers the 2160p videos on all their recent videos in the last few years.
So I download files that are 720p or 540p, to save space on the hard drive.
Because I can't see any improvement in the visual quality of higher definitions on my monitors.
And when I stream videos, I stream in 720p or 540p.
Again, that's because I don't see an improvement in the visual quality from higher definitions.
And, there is less buffering of a video when streaming at 540p or 720p than at higher definitions:
the videos play more smoothly.
For me, there is no real benefit of a Ultra High Definition site, from the higher definitions offered.
Except for the content, of course. A lot of the videos are worth watching.
That is because the site and network models are young teens who are mainly attractive to very attractive.
And these are young girls who seem to be enjoying themselves while having sex.
The sex is hardcore. Not usually a lot of build-up to the sex.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE REPLY SECTION:
A note on joining the Teen Mega World (TMW) network.
If you join any site in the Teen Mega World network, you gain access to all the sites in the network.
There are currently over 30 sites.
I recommend joining through the Teen Mega World site itself.
The reason is that if you join through one of the member sites, the search at the site you joined is limited to the join site.
Even if you transfer to another site in the network, you are still logged in to the join site, and the search will still only return content from the join site.
But if you join through the Teen Mega World site itself, then the search returns content from all the network sites.
This is a big advantage.
There is a work-around in the search if you join through a site other than the Teen Mega World site,
but it requires extra effort in finding the content of a model, and then extra effort in viewing the content of the model at the different sites.
So much simpler and easier to join through the Teen Mega World site directly.
I joined through Teen Sex Movs, and it's been a real problem searching for the content of different models at the network, with more effort to viewing the content at the different sites.
A gallery of gorgeous young models.
Great quality in the videos and photo sets.
A lot of content, for a reasonable price.
And easy to use: navigation, search, model listing, streaming and downloading options, etc. etc. etc.
And a wow factor, that makes the content exciting to view.
4K would definitely bring out the imperfections of the models.
Except I usually watch videos on smaller monitors, where I watch videos at 540p, because higher definitions are mainly wasted on the monitors I use.
If I ever do get a large, hi-definition monitor, then I would consider downloading or viewing in 4K.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price: $9.95/month with PU discount. Or $7.45/month with a 1-year membership.
-Secure login. Secure membership pages (https). So no ISP record of which specific pages you visit.
-Get 2 confirming emails on joining: give you complete details of your membership: login details, price and type of membership (monthly, or longer), credit card used (last 4 digits of card).
-Excellent customer service: available 24/7. Live chat support is also 24/7, fast to answer, with knowledgeable staff to answer question. Maybe the best support staff I've ever dealt with.
-A large amount of gonzo porn at the Devils Film site.
-You also get access to over 25 sites in the Devils Film network, which means you have access to a ton of hardcore gonzo porn.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading of all content.
-The physical beauty of the models has improved in recent years.
-The search returns hits from the entire network, instead of only from the site you are logged into.
Cons:
-The Devils Film network is part of the Fame Digital network. It specializes in hardcore gonzo porn.
If your tastes run to heartcore porn, or softer-edged porn, then this site (and network) would be less appealing to you.
-Not a lot of effort is put into making the models appear attractive: if the same model appears at a heartcore site (X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, Vixen), she can be attractive to lovely to gorgeous. If she appears at Devils Film, she is not made up (with makeup or costume or setting) to appear stunning.
The natural look is what Devils Film uses.
-A few years ago, they changed the site and network structure. They removed the simple dropdown menu that made switching between sites easy and simple. The current dropdown menu is harder to use.
-The site/network update also made exploring the contents of each site more difficult. The site contents are presented in a numerical listing of site pages, that is less easy to browse than if you were able to enter each site completely.
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
-you seem to be positioned in a gateway site, that allows you to view the site contents, without actually allowing you to fully enter the site you want to examine.
My guess is that this allows the sites to be maintained more easily, since the individual sites are now virtual sites, instead of the original sites that existed on a server. So the individual sites are now maintained as a listing of videos and photosets, instead of the videos and photosets that used to form the sites.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page. But this is standard for most porn sites.
-Far too many tats and fake breasts, but this is standard for hardcore gonzo porn.
Actually, the attractiveness of the models seems to have improved recently.
-The photoset accompanying each video is made of screenshots. Competing sites have much better-quality photosets than this site/network. Which is disappointing, because even though the models are not presented at their most attractive, some of the scenes are worth saving, if the photos were better quality.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Devils Film and the Fame Digital network is hardcore gonzo porn.
For a very low price, you gain access to a ton of porn.
Any one of the sites listed above, by itself, would be worth the membership price.
So if you are a fan of hardcore gonzo porn, this site and network is a bargain.
You also get complete access to over 20 other sites that cover a variety of niches:
tranny, squirting, granny, interracial, taboo family porn, etc.
I wish they would they go back the old site/network structure, but this is doubtful, because they've used the updated structure for years now.
And it's not just this site/network that uses the gateway structure: Teen Mega World uses it also, with the same or worse problems of navigation.
Bottom line:
The site and network is a bargain for fans of hardcore gonzo porn.
As long as you don't require high-quality videos.
These network is basically a collection of DVD rips.
It emphasizes quantity over quality.
If you want heartcore, then go elsewhere.
Actually, I prefer Teen Mega World over Devils Film, because the models at Teen Mega World are younger teens who are more attractive, with less tats and implants.
And Teen Mega World also has a ton of hardcore content, with access to around 30 sites covering different niches.
I also prefer the Diesel Access network, which is another fine teen hardcore network, that has quality models and excellent video and photoset quality: the models at Diesel Access are top tier.
But like I said, Devils Film is definitely worth a join, for fans of hardcore gonzo porn.
And the price ($9.95/month) is a steal.
I've read that some sites block download managers.
But this is the first site I've heard of that tells you to disable Norton antivirus.
I'm not computer-literate: but that just seems strange to me.
And dangerous.
If you wander the Internet, you probably come across hundreds or thousands of articles describing how hackers can infect your computers and cell phones and other devices.
I use Norton antivirus.
Have used it for many years.
Every so often, it gives me a pop-up message that it blocked a website from attacking my PC.
That's without downloading anything: just visit a site, and your computer/device can be attacked.
I'm not saying Norton is the best anti-virus program out there, but I'd be nervous as heck if I didn't have it running.
So I wouldn't join the Swallowed site if they advise disabling Norton antivirus.
I've had many different credit cards declined at many different sites.
The reasons for the decline can differ.
If you really want to join the Woodman site, you can call each of your credit cards that were declined, and ask if the card charge was declined by the card company.
Many times, the decline, when applying for a porn site membership, is because the card company suspects fraud.
If the card charge was declined by the credit card company, you can tell them the charge was valid, and they will process the payment for membership.
The algorithm credit card companies use to decline charges is sometimes flawed.
I've had charges declined on one card that had a recurring charge to a payment processor, and I tried to use the card as payment for a new porn membership with the same payment processor, and those charges were declined (because of suspected fraud).
Thanks for the reply, tangub.
I was hoping for a site on the lines of MetArt, MPL Studios, Femjoy.
With attractive teen girls in glamour-style shoots.
But the 1 By Day site is, like you say, focusing on large-breasted girls and I much prefer the other glamour sites I mentioned.
Anyway, I'm cancelling my membership to DDF Network, since I was wasting my money on sites I did not use (I actually forgot I had a sub here until I saw it listed at a Vendo site I was using to cancel a different site sub).
I'm not sure what you mean. 1 By Day is included in a DDF Network subscription.
You get full access to the site, with unlimited streaming and downloading privileges, I believe.
You do not have to pay an extra fee to access the site.
At Team Skeet, they use the word "unlock" to indicate their premium sites, that you have to pay extra for to access the site. Each premium site requires a separate fee, and does not give you access to any other site in the Team Skeet network.
But I don't recall seeing "unlock" used at DDF Network. DDF Network gives you access full access to about 14 different porn sites. About 8 sites update actively, the other 6 sites are archive sites.
But there is no additional fee to "unlock" any of the 14 sites.
Again, where did you see the "unlock" phrase used?
Does DDF Network have a glamour model site like MetArt or Femjoy?
I seem to remember, back in the day, that DDF (or maybe I'm confusing it with Digital Desire) had a website that featured glamour models.
Can any past or current members of DDF tell me if the network has a glamour model site?
I'm not that interested in the hardcore gonzo videos or photo sets, of which the network has a ton.
Thanks for the detail explanation.
I'm a diamond member, and the way the web pages load, on the Updates page for All Fine Girls it shows updates-and you don't realize it's for the other sites in the network.
As I mentioned in my review, they used to have a blog where they sometimes mentioned site news, members could ask questions, post comments.
But they dropped that feature years ago.
The blog was helpful, because you could learn from it.
The sites and network at Dielse Access Network (or whatever their current name has changed to) do a poor job of telling members what the news is, any changes to the sites, whatever.
But it's an important point you brought up, and maybe you could post a comment on the PU All Fine Girls page, that the site has stopped updating for a while now.
Just to let other PU members know.
Thanks for taking the time to point it out for me.
Review serves as a useful warning to those of us with poor memories of what Naughty America has become.
Thanks for trying to save us money on worthless sites.
When I got to the updates page on All Fine Girls, I see:
Pornstar's Room (Gina Gerson) a video posting date 2018-08-02.
She is a horny pip! (Milla Azul) a photo set posting date 2018-08-02.
My Personal Chef (Nimfa) a photo set posting date 2018-08-01
plus other updates.
The site seems to average 1 new update daily, whether it's a video or a photo set.
I haven't been paying attention to this particular site, because I have too many subs.
So I'm really wasting my money with too many subs that I'm not using effectively.
But if All Fine Girls has stopped updating, that would be a significant point to make.
Are you saying that the recent updates are merely reposts of earlier content?
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-There are several factors that make this a great site for teen porn:
-The models are East European girls in their teens and early twenties. Slender white girls who are pretty to just gorgeous.
-The quality level of the videos and photo sets is high: X-Art, Blacked, Tushy and Vixen present their models at their finest, but the girls at All Fine Girls are just slightly below that level.
-The girls are young and seem to enjoy exploring their bodies and their sexuality. That adds spice to the videos and photo sets.
-Membership includes unlimited steaming and downloading. In multiple definitions.
Cons:
-PU member nikator pointed out that All Fine Girls has stopped updating since May 2018.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-Vendo is the billing agent. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are easy to use and reliable.
However, I've used Vendo many times, and never had a billing problem.
Except that CCBill and Epoch are easier to use: easier to find account details, to cancel, whatever.
-They used to have a blog inside the member's area where you could read about site news, ask questions, post comments. They eliminated it years ago: too much work on the part of the staff?
-They don't date their announcements: they tout a "new platform" that is several years old.
-They say they will restart their free cam shows, and 2 or more years later, the cam shows are still missing, and are probably forgotten.
-When they merged a lot of different sites into the All Fine Girls site, they eliminated a lot of the older content. Some of the older content was good or interesting, even if the quality was
Bottom Line:
Note: PU and TBP show a streaming only membership for $17.95/month recurring.
But when I go to the All Fine Girls site, I do not see any streaming only membership.
I know they offered it in the past, but my guess is they dropped the streaming only membership and now only offer memberships that include both streaming and downloading.
The sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) seem to have reduced their membership prices.
In 2017, it cost $89.95 for a 6 month membership, recurring, with streaming and downloading.
Now it's $44.95 for a 6 month membership, with streaming and downloading.
Current prices at All Fine Girls
$24.95/month recurring: unlimited streaming and downloading.
$29.95 for 1 month: non-recurring.
$44.95 for 6 months recurring: unlimited streaming and downloading.
The site used to be called 18 Only Girls.
When the site changed its name to All Fine Girls, the reviews of the previous name were eliminated from the PU site.
But the site itself has been around for many years, and has a large backlog of videos and photo sets.
All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn make up the Diesel Access Network.
Except that I think the Diesel Access Network name has now been dropped.
There is a fourth site, Ultra Films, that is run by the same company, but is marketed separately.
If you join All Fine Girls, and stay a member for over 2 months, you gain access to Wow Girls and Wow Porn.
That is if you join on a regular subscription.
I joined Wow Girls and Wow Porn on a special offer, and was told in an email that I would have to be a member for 12 months before I would gain access to All Fine Girls.
Or I could pay a special fee to upgrade and gain membership to All Fine Girls immediately.
Since the special fee was $19.95, I paid and gained access to all 3 sites.
If you join either Wow Girls or Wow Porn, you immediately get access to both sites.
And if you keep your membership active for over 2 months, you also get access to 18 Only Girls.
That is with a regular subscription membership.
This review is for All Fine Girls.
In truth, all 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) are interchangeable.
They feature the same models.
The subject matter of the videos from the 3 sites are the same: Teen porn: solo masturbation, lesbian of 2 or more girls, boy-girl, boy with 2 or more girls, etc.
The content of each site is basically exclusive: however, a number of videos and photo sets can also be found at Teen Mega World and at Team Skeet: these are the massage videos.
And a tiny amount of other photo sets can also be found at different sites.
So the content at Diesel Access Network is not 100% exclusive, but most of the content is exclusive.
There is no exclusive theme for any of the 3 sites. The basic theme is teen porn. A video or photo set could easily be placed in any one of the 3 sites:
Actually, a small number of videos can be found at one site, and the accompanying photo set (probably made from screen caps of the video shoot) can sometimes be found at a different site in the Diesel Access network.
And the watermark on both the video and the photo set, even though posted at different sites, is the same watermark.
One example of how a video and it's matching photo set can be placed in any one of the 3 sites:
The video and photo set for Britney S, titled "Staying Alone", has the watermark WowGirls.com, even though both are posted in the All Fine Girls site.
What I'm saying is the content of all 3 sites is similar. However, you will not find any content duplicated at more than one site.
The site and network has several main selling points:
-The level of attractiveness of the models is wonderful: These are mainly teen and early twenties, East European girls, who are young, and pretty to gorgeous looking
-The quality of the videos and photo sets are extremely good.
Many years ago, the quality of the photo sets was just OK to slightly good. But the quality has improved over the years, both from software programs and better cameras, and the photo sets are definitely worth collecting. Especially considering how attractive the girls are.
In conclusion:
I think All Fine Girls is one of the top hardcore teen sites available. Throw in the other 2 sites in the network, Wow Girls and Wow Porn, and the network offers a huge amount of hardcore teen porn.
For a very reasonable price.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Secure login page. (https)
-Secure member pages. (https)
This keep some information safer from hacking, and leaves less of a record for your ISP.
-Superior support: live chat is 24/7, fast to respond, with knowledgeable, helpful staff.
-You can also access support by toll-free telephone, or email.
-Membership in any one of the Fame Digital network sites gives you access to over 20 sites.
-There is a trailer for most videos, to give you a quick look at the action of the video.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading are included in the basic membership price.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. But this is almost standard for any porn site.
-Sometimes will experience a poor connection. Yesterday, I could not stream videos (they stuttered and stopped), and downloading files was very slow. I checked my internet connection at a test site, was was getting about 102 to 110 Mbps, which should give smooth streaming and fast downloads, but my connection to the Devils Film network server was poor.
-They did a network update a few years ago, making the site and network harder to use: They dropped the easy-to-see-and-use dropdown menu for changing sites. And they changed the structure of the entire network, so that you are now forced to use a gateway site instead of actually entering the different sites you have access to--which makes exploring and accessing the contents of each site harder.
-Slow update rate. For the last year, 1 new video per month.
-The photosets are poor screencaps of the accompanying video.
CONS CONTINUE:
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-The software mechanism for viewing the photosets online is clumsy and poorly designed.
-The sound control of the videos can be poor: Sound can spike suddenly, making normal sounds into explosions.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
Site theme: For many years now, the bald pussy look has been the norm. HairyUndies is a niche site that features women with pubic hair.
The site is part of the Devils Film network.
-The most famous sites in this network include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD
Access to any one of the sites listed above would justify the membership price: Access to all 5 major sites, plus over 15 more sites, means you have access to a huge amount of hardcore porn for a very low price.
PU lists this site (HairyUndies.com) as a clone of the Devils Film site.
This is probably because all the videos and photosets (the photosets are screencaps of the video) carry the Devils Film watermark.
Also, the videos are listed as "from Devilsfilm" on the gateway site.
My interpretation: The Devils Film network uses a gateway system where you are logged in to a gateway site, and access the different sites from the gateway site, instead of actually entering each separate site completely.
This means it's easier for the network to maintain the network, since they don't have to work on each separate site, but only on the network gateway.
It makes it harder for the user to explore and access the content of each site.
And also it's more confusing about which videos belong to which site, since there's some question whether any particular video is part of one site, or just randomly thrown in from a different site.
And the watermark on the video is no help, since the sites labelled under the Devils Film section all carry the Devils Film logo. (Hairy Undies is labelled under the Devils Film section.)
Maybe a software engineer could explain it more simply: but I do not believe Hairy Undies is a clone, but a listing of a site that no longer exists as a separate site, but is a listing of videos and the accompanying photosets that formerly made up the Hairy Undies site.
Anyway, I'm giving the site and network a score of 82.
This is because you get access to a huge amount of hardcore porn for a very low price.
There are some real gems at the network, but you have to slog through a lot of junk to find them.
Always on the hunt for new, exciting or fresh material.
So why collect, since the collection is not new or fresh?
Because some of the older stuff still has value.
Some truly beautiful photos of great looking models.
However, the thrill is in the hunt, for the newest, brightest, most wonderful porn we'll ever see.
Except that as I get older, now in my 70s, my energy is less, though I still enjoy a fantastic photo of a great looking woman, or a video that can move me.
Computers can make mistakes.
So the error message that a server is mis-configured could be worthless (I sometimes get that same mis-configured error message, and ignore it: sometimes I re-send my email, and it then goes through.)
Anyway, it might be that your account was hacked. That seems to be very common, about charges to cam shows that people never watched or requested.
Or, it could be a computer error, where your mouse flicked over some link, and that's why you are getting charged.
Or some other reason.
So, my advice, have patience, but not too much: Send a message to chat, or support, that you did not request the cam shows, did not watch them, and were billed in error.
I've never dealt with ECHST.
From what I've read (you can't put a lot of weight on internet reports about payment processors), they are far less responsive or reliable than CCBill or Epoch or Vendo.
Some of their agents can be rude with dealing with customers.
So, stand your ground.
Do not pay fraudulent charges.
If need be, if ECHST does not want to give a refund, call your credit card company, and protest the charges.
And, as a last resort, have your card cancelled, and be issued a new card account with your credit card company.
(That's if ECHST continues to make charges on your card.)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Secure login page (https).
-Secure member pages (https).
-Nice model index.
2 forms of the model index:
1: Pages with about 20 models each, name and thumbnail of model.
2. An alphabetical listing of the model by name (no thumbnail, but hot link to model's page, which has a nice-sized thumbnail of the model, plus links to whatever videos she appears in.
-All content is supposed to be exclusive. This has to be modified: content shot for the site is exclusive, but they also use some content from other sites, such as Wet and Puffy, which is obviously not exclusive.
-No download limits.
-Each video has a matching photoset.
The photosets are nice-quality photos.
The videos can be streamed and/or downloaded in multiple definitions:
-You get a confirming email on signup from Vendo (if that is the payment processor you used) with your billing details:
Cons:
-small site. No bonus material.
-currently 91 models. Most appear to be late teens, early twenties. Mainly white. Mainly slender. Not a lot of tattoos on most of the models.
-There is a small amount of data given for a model:
Name, nationality, age, breast size, weight, height.
-2 pre-checked cross-sales on join page.
-Your login details (username and password) are pre-selected by the site.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: lesbian fisting and twisting (turning your fist in the girl's pussy).
The site design is clean: the scenes are shot in a white room, with white furniture and white sheets on a white bed, making the girls stand out clearly.
There is teasing, kissing and caressing, and the use of different tools to stimulate and widen the pussy. I'm not into lesbian tools, but there are speculums, forceps, dildoes, vibrators.
This is a small site: You should be able to watch all the videos in a month. Or if you pick and choose, you can scan the contents in less than a week.
$9.95 for 1 month then $29.95 every month until cancelled.
The first month is cheap. But why you would want to renew is beyond me. Since this is a small site, with a slow update rate, and no bonus sites to explore.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
That is because of the small content.
However, the videos are photo sets are good quality, and most of the videos are exclusive.
So if you are into lesbian fisting, it might be worth a join, since the first month is only $9.95.
But I personally prefer sites with more content, or with bonus sites you can enjoy.
The models are mainly slender white teen/early twenties girls, not a lot of tattoos.
But the videos, even though professionally shot, don't have a lot of heat or passion. Not much eroticism.
So I recommend looking for a more satisfying site to spend your membership dollars.
If you are into lesbian fisting, I recommend reading PU member MargulisAZ's review and comments on the site, Fister Twister, since he seems to be a fan of the niche and has written an excellent review of the site and a couple of worthwhile comments.
That will give you a better flavor of what the site offers, it's pros and cons.
My interest is more superficial, and I thought the site was disappointing, in spite of it's low price.
"No problems using my download manager (Firefox DTA)"
Is there a new version of Down Them All that works with the current version of Firefox?
My understanding is that DTA has not worked with the newer versions of Firefox for a while.
So:
Are you using the current version of Firefox, or an older version that allows DTA to work?
If DTA has released an updated version that works with the current version of Firefox, I would be glad to know.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-$14.95 for first month, with PU discount.
-Secure login-https. Keeps your login details safe from hacking.
-Secure member pages-https. Keeps your internet activity shielded slightly from your ISP.
-Same login details (username and password) works for each site you have access to.
-Membership in any one of the Fame Digital network sites gives you access to over 20 sites.
(This is the Devils Film network, which is separate from the Evil Angel network-although they are both part of Fame Digital or Gamma Entertainment).
-Live chat support is 24\7. Fast to respond, with knowledgeable staff. When I first joined, I could not log in. Live chat quickly solved the problem: The login details from a previous membership were interferring with my current login details, and the login page did not show this clearly. Support suggested clearing cache and cookies, and that solved the problem.
-Each video has a trailer, to give you quick-view of the video.
PROS CONTINUE IN THE NEXT SECTION:
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-The site and network have choices for streaming and/or downloading.
The streaming choices are: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
The download choices are the same: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
When I watch a video on a 27" monitor, at 540p, the quality of the video is surprisingly good: the video has excellent lighting, professional focus, good sound control.
There is no need to go to a higher definition for streaming or downloading.
Maybe on a larger monitor there might be a difference: but 540p is a fine choice for downloading or streaming on a 27" monitor (or smaller).
CONS(START OF):
-A site/network update in 2014 made navigation harder. They changed the drop-down menu for switching between sites.
-The site/network update also changed the structure of the network: You now enter a gateway site, which gives you partial access to the different sites. But instead of entering any one site completely, you are held at the gateway site.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
The logic for the gateway system, I believe, it that it makes it easier to manage and update the gateway, instead of having to update each of the 20 plus sites separately.
But the gateway system makes exploring each separate site harder.
-The search function could be improved: If you search for a model's name, it returns any matches that contain either the first part of the model's name, or the last part of the model's name. So you have to filter the search results.
However, the search covers the entire network, instead of a single, specific site you are logged in to: which makes it easier to use, instead of having to do a search for each individual site.
Also, a useful feature on the search results: when you click on the thumbnail of the model's video, you open the video: you don't have to manually transfer to the the specific site the content is listed under: for example, the video, Deep Throat This #13, starring Hannah Harper, a Peter North video, opens in the gateway site: You don't have to transfer to the Peter North pseudo-site, to open or play the video.
--The models are girls in their late teens or early twenties, that are OK to good-looking, with not a lot of tattoos
The main negative is that the models are not actors: the plots are silly or stupid, and the dialogue is worthless: this is just show the girl, have her give a blow job, then fuck the girl. Not a lot of thought or lead-up to the sex, which is plain-vanilla fucking.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is the popular fake incest, where step family members have sex. Since they are not related by blood, but by marriage or adoption, it's not really incest, but fake incest. This is supposed to add an extra thrill of the forbidden to the sex. But the forbidden element seems tame, to me, since it's not incest, but fake incest. I guess that fake incest has fewer legal issues than a real incest porno (except that in a "real incest porno", the actors would not be related by blood, but only playing they were related by blood).
-This site (Out of the Family) is listed as a clone of the Devils Film site.
I believe this is wrong, and does not represent the site and network structure that is current.
The site (Out of the Family) and Devils Film are part of 20 plus sites that are members of a gateway site, that gives access to the videos and photo sets of what used to be 20 plus sites.
But the sites no longer exist as separate sites: instead, you have a gateway site, that you log in to.
And that gateway, gives you access to the videos and photo sets at each of what used to be 20+ separate sites.
But you can't enter any of the separate sites completely: you remain in the gateway site, which, when you select one of the sites, gives you content pages of the videos and photo sets that are categorized as being in that site.
So Out of the Family is not a clone site: it is, instead, one of the sites you access through the gateway site, where each individual site no longer exists as a separate site on a server, but instead is a software program that allows you access to the videos and photo sets that are categorized as different sites.
That's my interpretation: The videos and photo sets are not linked by the Devils Film site into a clone site, where you have the same videos and photo sets.
Instead, you have a completely different listing of videos and photo sets that fall under the Out of my Family site, which is separate from the listing of videos and photo sets that fall under the Devils Film site.
Access to any one of the top sites would justify the membership price of $14.95 for the first month.
If you are new to porn, or haven't joined this site in years, then, assuming you are a fan of hardcore porn, the membership is more than worth the price.
However, if your tastes are more sophisticated, then you might enjoy the heartcore style of porn offered at competing sites like X-Art, Blacked, Tushy or Vixen: Those sites offer models in their late teens and early twenties who are chosen for their physical beauty: The models are presented to be very attractive, with make-up, costumes, lighting, sets done professionally, and with a small storyline and better acting that makes the video like a well-done love scene, with sex.
The membership price is higher, the content is less, but it is comparing highest quality to middle-grade porn.
I would not consider Out of the Family to be low-grade porn, since the videos and photo sets are quite good in production values, even if the plot is stupid.
Giving the site a score of 85, because the site is a worthwhile join, and the network access makes the value even better.
I just wish they returned to the old network structure, since the navigation was faster and easier, but since it's been several years now, that seems unlikely to happen.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
