Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login.
-Good download speeds. I get over 5 MB/sec download speed, which is about my maximum download connection.
-Good site structure. Easy to navigate around the site. Since there are so many models and photo sets, you need a simple structure to navigate through the massive contents.
-Alphabetical listing of models, with nice sized thumbnails to show what each model looks like.
-Each photo set has zip files for download, with 3 different definitions to choose from: high, medium, low definition.
-This is a high grade photo site.
-Over 160 contributing photographers, many of them world-class.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before you are timed out of the site due to inactivity.
-Accepts download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
Cons:
-No videos. Photo sets only.
-This is psychology, but since you have a massive amount of beautiful young models, you start to get bored with physical beauty. And many of these models are amazingly beautiful.
-Update rate: 1 photo set per day. This seems poor when compared to MetArt, which averages 4 photo sets per day. But one update per day is probably average for high-end photo sites.
-Erotic beauty has the thumbnails of a photo set presented on up to 7 different pages, so you have to click from one page to another to see the entire set. MetArt has the thumbnails of a set on 2 pages, so it's easier to examine the complete
set without a lot of mouse clicks.
Bottom Line:
I'm reviewing Erotic Beauty, but I think the most meaningful approach is to compare it to MetArt, which is a sister site in the MetArt network of sites.
I've been a member of MetArt and Erotic Beauty numerous times in the past. I finally bought a lifetime membership to MetArt, since I consider it the best softcore site on the internet. And I've been a continuous member of Erotic Beauty for over two
years, since I last joined it using a special offer that was unbelievably inexpensive.
I'm not saying I'm an expert on either site. But I've been enjoying their content for many years.
Erotic Beauty is a high end glamour site, which focuses on softcore teen/early twenties models.
It's basically a smaller version of the MetArt site.
Both sites share the same approach: find attractive teen or early twenties models, and use a wide variety of professional photographers to capture their beauty.
If MetArt didn't exist, Erotic Beauty would be an excellent site to join. But the problem is that MetArt does exist, and a comparison of the two sites shows that MetArt is the far better value for your money:
As far as I can tell, there is nothing to set Erotic Beauty apart from MetArt: nothing in themes, nothing in explicitness.
Any of the Erotic Beauty sets could easily be posted to the MetArt site. And vice versa.
In my opinion, most of the MetArt videos are boring. You have lovely young girls, in softcore poses, and the videos are mainly a waste of time. The photo sets at MetArt (and Erotic Beauty), although softcore, are far more erotic and
interesting than the videos at MetArt. I can't explain the reason the MetArt videos are so boring, although I have noticed that many softcore sites seem to specialize in making softcore videos that are a waste of time.
That's my opinion, anyway, and it seems to be shared by the PU members who have commented on how boring the MetArt videos are.
Many (probably most) of the models that appear in Erotic Beauty also appear in MetArt. Although both sites use many of the same models, the photo sets that appear at one site do not appear at the other site. Each site has exclusive content.
Both sites share the same basic structure.
Both sites offer zip files for each photo set in three definitions: low, medium, and high definition.
Both sites have an alphabetical listing of their models, with nice-sized thumbnails to illustrate each model.
But since the number of models at both sites is so large (over 1,700 at Erotic Beauty, over 3,100 at MetArt), it's exhausting looking through the alphabetical listing to see all the different models. There's just too many attractive girls, and you start to get bored by physical beauty.
Since both MetArt and Erotic Beauty cost the same for a membership, and since MetArt has a catalog of photo sets that is over four times as large, and since there is no added value in an Erotic Beauty photo set over a MetArt photo set, the
advantage obviously belongs to MetArt.
I'm giving Erotic Beauty a score of 85, because it's a good site, but MetArt is a much better value.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-No download limits (for regular membership); trial memberships are different.
-No DRM.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Streaming offered in: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p (for newer videos).
-Download offered in: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p (for newer videos).
-Excellent download speeds. I get over 4 MB/sec with DownThemAll.
-DownThemAll download manager works with site.
-A lot of attractive models. Not too many tattoos or piercings.
-Thousands of professionally shot videos-good lighting, good editing, good sound control, etc.
-PU discount of $15 for the first month.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sell on join page.
-Captcha required on login.
-Only some content is exclusive. If you've joined many DVD sites, you will find a lot of videos you've seen before.
-The older videos don't have the newer definition choices that the new content has.
-Some people may be fans of Peter NorthPeter North considers himself a porn star, like a movie star, and his site blog shows photographs an expensive Ferrari he owns. The last announcement from Peter North on his blog was June 7, 2013-so he's not as active on his site any more.
-Many of the newer videos don't feature Peter North himself.
-Peter North also has an online store, where, if you're a fan, you can buy his DVDs, sex toys and apparel. Maybe it's a big ego, or good advertising, but I think it's strange. Strike that. If he can make money selling things, more power to him.
-One new video every 3 days to Peter North site. But the huge backlog at this site and other sites you have access to make this a minor con.
Bottom Line:
By joining this site, you get access to a boatload of hardcore videos of good quality, for a very low price. Peter North is part of the netFameSolutions network, also called the Fame Dollars network, owned and operated by Gamma Entertainment. There are over 100 sites in the network.
My understanding is that the network is broken down into two main sub-networks: When you join either sub-network, you get access to a large number of sites in that sub-network.
For simplicity's sake, I think of the two sub-networks as Devils Film and Evil Angel.
Joining Devils Film (or joining any of the sites included in the Devils Film sub-network) gives you access to all the sites in that particular sub-network.
The Devils Film sub-network also includes a number of smaller sites that are definitely worth examining.
The Devils Film sub-network also includes a number of niche sites that have smaller content, that would appeal to special tastes: Bushy Bushy (models have pubic hair) Curry Creampie (model is supposed to be Indian-from India) Granny Ghetto (older models) Tranny Pros (she-males)
etc.
Bottom line:
You get access to almost 30 different sites for a low price, which makes this a great value.
Some of the sites are worth the price of admission just by themselves:
You also have access to a number of other worthwhile sites, as well as access to the smaller niche sites that might be of interest to someone, or just too exotic for that person's tastes.
Peter North is an icon in porn. Rocco Siffredi is another legend. Silvia Saint and Silverstone are major porn names. I keep repeating myself, but you get a huge amount of professional-quality hardcore videos, for a very low price. This is not glamcore, it's more like soft-gonzo hardcore. The content is 100% different from a glamcore site like X-Art, but this site (and sub-network) is a bargain for what it offers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price. First month is $14.95 with PU discount.
-Huge number of gonzo hardcore videos.
-Large number of categories or niches, including black, bubble but, shemale, granny, etc.
-Can stream or download the videos.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Download managers work. I use Down Them All.
-Good download speeds. I got over 4MB/sec.
-In site special discounts. Normally I don't bother looking at these, but there are some interesting discounts to other sites.
-Evil Angel: 30 Day Pass for $4.50.
-Club Seventeen: 30 Day Pass for $5.95.
-Team Skeet: 30 Day Pass for $12.95.
-Wide diversity of models: age, race, body type.
-A huge number of download options for some videos: 160p, 240p.360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
Cons:
-They require a captcha to log in to the site. Sometimes the images are hard to read, and you have to try several times to enter the site.
-There are 2565 videos of models who are tattooed or pierced. I don't like tattoos, or piercing.
-Navigation is poor. There are many areas it could be improved.
-Navigation is sometimes confusing. You can click on a link, and be ejected from the site.
-Navigation: You are logged in to the Devil's Film site, but it also shows scenes from other sites in the network.
-I watch porn on my laptop. The videos play, but sometimes the normal controls are not visible: I am referring to the "play", "pause", "time elapsed" controls that are normally at the bottom of the screen.
-I prefer models that are pretty to beautiful. Most models here are just OK to plain.
-Pre-check offer on the join page.
-Biller is fameaid. I prefer CCBILL or EPOCH, which are nationally recognized processors that are easy to deal with.
Focussing on the Devils Film site itself: the site specializes in gonzo sex: crude, rude, low-life sex. Many sub-niches,
almost none of which appeal to me.
So why join?
Because maybe the hardcore gonzo videos will appeal to your tastes.
You get access to several other sites that aren't quite as gonzo. And some of these sites will almost certainly have videos that you might find entertaining.
For example, the Rocco Siffredi site has some videos that are truly hot. You just have to look through the junk to find the videos that appeal.
-Which is one reason I prefer sites like X-Art, where you don't find a lot of junk:
1. the X-Art models are attractive to lovely.
2. the sex is presented in an erotic way.
3. the videos and photosets are shot in high-class, professional manner.
But sometimes you want a change of pace. And Devils Film certainly gives you the bottom of the barrel in hardcore videos.
The videos are shot in a professional manner. The lighting is good, the camera technique is good. But this is gonzo sex, often times kinky sex. And you need a strong stomach to watch a lot of it.
I am giving the site a score of 85: because the site (and the network) gives value for the money:
1. access to a huge amount of hardcore videos.
2. access to a large number of niches.
3. the videos are professionally shot-so they are good quality.
4. the site has excellent download speeds, wide range of download choices for the videos, and it's fairly easy to move around the network from one site to another (You don't have to re-login each time you switch to a different site).
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Most of the videos I saw had models who appear to be real latin teens or early twenties.
-This site is part of the Team Skeet network. Access to any site in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Easy login to site. Once you have logged in, you do not have to re-enter your login information, just click the "members" link to re-enter the site.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I got 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Can stream or download many videos in multiple definitions.
-$17.87/month recurring discounted price through PU.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor.
-Content does not have a posting date.
-In many of the videos the guys are wearing condoms. Doesn't bother me, but some viewers might not like it.
-When you log into the site, the first page you see is a cross-sell to some other porn site. If you click the "No thanks" link, you then enter the members area. This is minor, but it's one of
the few porn paysites I've seen where you have to bypass an advertising screen before you can enter the members area.
But then again, I believe that Amazon sells some e-readers or other branded devices, that come with automatic advertising. And if you pay a one-time fee, you get rid of the automatic advertising.
-Most of the videos are in Spanish. But who cares what the models or stunt cocks are saying? It's probably better if you don't understand, because that gives the videos an exotic flavor. Also, you have to admit, these latina models sure speak a lot more, and more naturally, than the Eastern European porn models.
Bottom Line:
This is a teen hardcore site featuring latina models.
The models are late teens or early twenties.
There are a lot of attractive models.
The body types are latin: so you don't get the preponderance of skinny white teens you have at many teen sites. At this site, you get a cross-section of skinny and medium-sized girls. Most of the girls have little or no tattoos. Very little piercing on most girls.
Most of the videos are 1 guy - 1 girl. There are a few 1 guy - 2 girls.
Videos
Number of videos: 168+
Runtime: about 20 to 40 minutes.
They have a number of different ways you can view a video.
For streaming, some have a choice of watching in low, medium, or high definition.
You can also choose to watch the entire video, a preview of the video, or break the video into which segment you want to watch.
For a video that run 29 minutes, you can select your starting point to watch at 0 (the start of the video), at 05.55 which means 5 minutes 55 seconds), at 11:54, 17:51, or 23:48.
Or you can choose to download:
1080p MP4; 720p MP4; HI mpg4; LOW mpg4; low WMV; IPod file.
They have a photo gallery for each video.
They also have a screen cap gallery for each video.
I'm not sure why they have both a photo gallery as well as a screen cap gallery. That seems like overkill.
But this site is geared more for videos than photos.
The photo galleries and the screencap galleries, for me, are a waste of resources and site space. I realize that the operators are trying to provide a complete resource for their members. But I appreciate photos from sites like Metart, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., where they try to present the models as attractively as possible.
At this site, they are presenting the models in a "natural" way.
So this approach might have fans, but I'm not one of them. If you can put your mind into a frame that the photo sets and the screen caps are like a stop-motion record of a latin guy getting ready to have sex with a latina, and then having the sex, then maybe you would appreciate the photos and screen caps. But I think it's just a waste of time, since you can watch the video directly.
Models have only 1 video at Oye Loca. But a few models might have a second video at another site in the network, and still fewer could have 3 or 4 videos scattered throughout the network.
They do provide a limited amount of data for each model. For example: for the model Sienna West:
Birthday: November 6
Birth Location: Orange County
Measurements: 34DD-24-34
Height: 160 cm - 5 feet and 3 inches
Weight: 55 kg - 121 lbs
Haircolor: Red
Nationality: Uruguay
Ethicity: Caucasian
Tatoos: Stars on both wrist; back of neck
Piercings: Navel, nose, upper lip
If you are into latina girls, or if you are tired of watching the slender young white teens featured at many other sites, then this site could provide a nice change of pace.
And with the other 13 sites that are included with a membership, you also get a nice variety of teen-early twenty models in a variety of settings and situations.
Giving the site a score of 85. That's highly subjective. Some users might rate it higher. Other users could rate it lower.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Teen Mega World network.
-PU discount gives you access for $19.95/month through Teen Mega World. If you join lollyhardcore directly, you pay $29.95/month.
-Content is dated.
-No dowload limits.
-No DRM.
-Simple navigation, because the site is small.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Zip files for photosets.
Cons:
-This is an archive site. Last update was 2010-08-20.
-Small site. Only 39 videos.
-Photosets are basically a capture of the video shoot. The photos are better quality than a screen capture, but little effort is made to frame them properly.
-Zip files only have one definition. No choice of low, medium or high.
Bottom Line:
-This is a single-model site featuring Lolly, a cute teen. She can be found at many different sites, under a number of different names:
Alicia A, Alisa, Jenny, Juli, Katie, Lolli, Lolli A., Lolly A, Loly, Sveta, Yana. A few sites she appears at are Diesel network, Metart, Teen Mega World, Zemani, etc.
As I said, you get this site with the Teen Mega World/Royal Cash network, which gives you access to a large number of sites. Almost all these sites focus on teens, but you also might get access to a few niche sites, such as Boys Love 18 (gay), Latin Shemales, and El Porno Latino.
The Teen Mega World network is one of the best bargains in teen hardcore videos, because it gives you a huge number of quality videos for a very low price. And there are a large number of models, many of them very attractive.
-Site Statistics:
Number of videos: 39
Video runtime: 11 to 20 minutes.
Sexual action: solo girl, boy-girl sex, 1 girl-2 guys, girl-girl, blow job, masturbation, etc.
Vids are offered as downloads in low, medium and high quality. But the high quality vids are 400 MB or less, for runtimes up to 20 minutes. So the definition is far less than what is offered at other Teen Mega World/Royal Cash sites. But the videos are still good, because Lolly is so cute, and she gives an enthusiastic performance.
This is another offering from the Teen Mega World network, and it's worth visiting. Lolly is a cute blonde teen, from Eastern Europe. Her videos show a lovely young teen who really enjoys her sexual encounters. Whether it's acting or not, she comes across as a bubbly, fun-loving girl, and that personality makes her videos more real and believable and exciting.
The only downside would be, if I could find a girl like her in real life, I'd be dead or in a hospital after one or two days. It would take a teenager or someone in their twenties to handle a girl like her.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price with PU discount. $9.95 for first month.
-Easy logon.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Membership in Devils Film gives you network access to many sites in the netFame Solutions network.
-This one site, not counting other sites in the network, gives you a huge amount of hardcore videos and photosets.
-It updates every day.
Cons:
-Make sure to uncheck the pre-checked cross-sell when signing up, or you will automatically be signed up to a different site as well, which will turn into an expensive membership once the trial period ends.
-Little effort is made to make the models attractive. For example, Ashlyn Rae has photosets at other sites where she is really attractive, and hardcore videos as well. At this network, she is plain-looking, and you have to look twice to see it's the same girl.
-Navigation is lousy.
Too much content to search through, with poor search engine.
-Listing of models is poor: you get small thumbnails that don't give you a clear picture of the model. Many thumbnails are missing, so there is no picture of the model. Also, under the name of a model, it can often show videos of the wrong model.
-Many times, the models in the videos are not identified, so you don't know their names, and searching for other videos featuring them is difficult.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):
-You can download videos as MP4 or WMV files, in 240p or 480p. 480p is much less high definition than the videos at Nubiles or Teen Mega World or many other sites.
-Sometimes have to re-enter your login information (username and password) when changing sites within the network. Other networks can make changing between sites easy.
-When watching streaming videos,even though the resolution is only 480p and my download speed is about 1.3MB/sec, the videos will often start and stop, start and stop. So streaming is a poor option for me.
-The monthly renewal price is $29.95, so be sure to cancel your membership before your first month's membership is renewed at the higher price.
Bottom Line:
Site Statistics:
Movies: 5608
DVDs: 1107
Pornstars: 2826
Pictures: 262010
For $10 the first month, you get a huge amount of hardcore videos. With the network access, you also get a wide variety of different niches. So it's well worth the price.
With so much material to browse, I wish the search was easier to use. And I wish the video definition was higher. And that the models were presented more attractively.
Giving the site a score of 85. You get access to a boatload of hardcore gonzo videos in many categories, as well as access to some other very worthwhile network sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Streaming option.
-Multiple download options: High, medium, low quality WMV file. A low quality MP4 file for portable devices.
-Simple navigation. Could be improved, but fairly easy to examine site contents.
-Nice integration into rest of network. A search on model's name returns all her content at the network, instead of just the single site's content.
Cons:
-No model bios.
-Some plot or buildup to the sex would add value to the videos.
-The action becomes predictable after watching a number of videos. These are mainly attractive girls getting fucked, but you need some variety or freshness to give the video meaning.
-The videos and photosets are true to the site theme of amateur teen action. That is both a plus and a minus. I wish the videos had higher production value, because these are attractive young girls. Their freshness and physical attractiveness is not emphasized in the videos and photos.
-Archive site. No updates since 2010-06-15.
Bottom Line:
This is part of the Teen Mega World (Royal Cash) network. The site used to be called Amateur Teen Movs, was renamed ATMovs. The site structure was also reformatted to the more easily usable form
found at most of the Teen Mega World sites.
Many models at the nework used to have multiple names. Which made searching for their content harder. Someone put in some good effort and
gave most of the models a single name. Also, a search was added that
searches throughout the network sites for content under a model's name, instead of a search specific to a single site. And the search returns not just the videos for a model, but hot links to those videos.
Not all the models' content has been renamed. Jelena has a video at ATMOVS. She is also the same model named Willa found at Teen Sex Movs, Teen Sex Mania, Beauty Angels and other sites in this network. But most of the models I checked did have a single name, which makes searching so much easier.
Site content is hardcore teen sex. Mainly boy-girl, with a few 2 boys-1 girl or 1 boy-2 girls or 2 boys 2-girls. This is straight hardcore sex,with no buildup or tease factor or plot. The girls are real teens, Eastern European, many are attractive. There are very few tattoos or piercings.
The site style is a good representation of the site's original name: amateur teen movs. The models are fresh young teens who are captured
fucking on video. The camera-style and setting is amateur, home style.
Site statistics:
Number of videos: 159.
Video runtime: around 25 minutes.
Number of photosets: 159 (Photoset is a photo record of a video shoot).
Number of photos per photoset: 87-200.
Individual photo: 45-70 KB.
Photo width x height: 720 x 576 pixels.
Note: the photos are nice-quality screencaps, but not worth saving.
Multiple download options for video:
High quality WMV, medium quality WMV, low quality WMV, low quality MP4 (for portable devices).
File size for high quality 15 minute clip: 372 MB = 24.8MB/minute.
File size for high quality 21 minute clip: 509 MB = 24.2MB/minute.
File size for high quality 26 minute clip: 631 MB = 24.3MB/minute.
High quality video:
Frame width x height: 720x576.
Total bitrate: 3168kbps.
You can join this site directly or through Teen Mega World. Using the PU/TBP discount link a membership costs $19.95/month. A membership through this site or through Teen Mega World gives you access to most of the network sites.
Most of the network sites are no longer updating. But there are several sites in the network that are updating. So you get access to a large amount of teen content, with a nice update schedule from the sites that are updating.
The network access raises this site's score to 85.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of videos for a site of this type.
-Site advertises more than 500 videos, more than 300 photosets.
-Note: TBP update 09-20-10 states 296+ videos, 37+photosets.
Why the big difference in the numbers, I don't know.
Looking at the site, without actually counting the separate videos, it seems the site contents is much smaller.
-Site advertises daily updates. The update rate is actually about 1 update every 7 days.
-Free live cams with models. You pay USD $2.95 (EUR € 2.30) for 30 days of access to several hours per day of nude public shows. Private chats are optional and cost extra.
-There is also a separate "Models online" service that offers a xxx webcam live show.
-Large number of cute models.
-Search engine: can search by model's name, month and year, video or photoset.
-Content is dated.
-Model's name is clearly listed for each video.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
Cons:
-No streaming.
-A simple text list of the models at this site, with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, would be very helpful.
-Single size for photos. No choice of low, medium or high resolution.
-No biography. Models identified by name only.
-Basic search. Can search by model's name or when video/photoset was posted. But can't search by description of model, type of sex, or any other factors.
-A faq page would be helpful, listing basic site facts: number of videos, number of photosets, number of photos, total size (GB) of videos, total size of photos, number of male models, number of female models.
-No text on the site identifies which videos are high definition. The HD videos are the ones that are 1 GB+ when you download them.
Bottom Line:
Photos are 1643 x 2464 pixels
Videos 720x576 (1100kbps)
File Sizes (HQ):
WMV = 200MB-1GB
This is the town where I should have grown up. Lovely, nubile chicks that fuck at the drop of a hat. Or the glance of an eye.
This is a hardcore teen video site. The videos far outnumber the photosets. Most of the videos are a boy and a girl.
Each video/photoset has a few thumbnails to show what's inside the file. It is difficult to get a clear idea of what the model looks like from the thumbnails that are actually furnished by the site. A much better system would be to have a nice-sized photo of the model that shows her clearly, plus 4 thumbnails that clearly show the model from the video/photoset.
The videos are good quality.
The technical factors are handled well: lighting, focus, action, a lot of good looking teens.
The photos are high quality: the size of a single photo is around 300-500 KB. I was surprised the photo size is so large, because the photos sure don't look high quality to me.I am not talking about the attractiveness of the model, or her makeup or costume. I am talking about the extreme clarity that photos can have, which is not found here. The colors are not brilliant or sharp. I just find the photos at major softcore glamor sites so much more appealing than the photos at this site.
If you are into hardcore teen action, this site has a lot of videos. The videos are good quality. The sex is gentler than the gonzo sites, and the teens actually talk and kiss before getting down to the action. The teens are ok to nice looking, very little tattoos or piercings.
The site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. Membership in any one site will normally give you access to some of the other sites. How many bonus sites you get, and what those bonus sites are, varies depending on which site you join through. It definitely pays to check each site for the bonus details. One site will offer 2 bonus sites, a different site might offer 6 bonus sites, another might offer 9 bonus sites.
I joined through Spunky Bee, which charged me the same or lower price for the membership, as joining a different TonyBucks site. And I got access to 9 bonus sites (10 sites total).
I am giving the site a score of 85, because it's part of a network that has a number of attractive models, and a large number of good quality videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-Some attractive models.
-Photosets are a visual record of a video shoot.
-Captcha very easy to read, and can be entered in either uppercase or lowercase.
-Site is currently updating.
-Have high quality videos (nice, clear definition, good lighting, etc.)
-Access to public chats, paid private chats
-Planning on making blu-ray DVDs of scenes available
Cons:
-Only 1 size picture for the photoset.
-No zip file for photosets.
-No streaming option for videos.
-A small amount of duplicate files from other TonyBucks network sites.
-High quality videos are large, 1-2GB+
Bottom Line:
This is a teen hardcore site.
Apparently 1 video a and matching photoset for each session. The photoset is apparently photos taken during a video shoot.
Most of the action is 1 boy-1 girl, or 2 boys-2 girls. But there is also some 2 boys-1 girl.
Video download options:
WMV: high, medium, low quality
MPEG
QuickTime
WMV high quality: 1440x1080, 8256 kbps
1920x1080, 6256 kbps
The videos are mainly crisp definition, good lighting, good skin tones on the models, little background noise (no music track, not a lot of random noise from the street as sirens or car sounds or whatever). The sets are simple: bedroom or living room. The models are all late teen or very early 20s. Very little tattoos on the female models, very little piercings.
Denner mentioned in a reply there is duplication of video files at different TonyBucks sites. He stated that some of these videos can be also be found at non-TonyBucks sites as well, such as TeenMegaWorld sites. I've seen some videos which were posted at more than one TonyBucks site.
But even though I've been a member of TeenMegaWorld a couple of times, there is material I never bothered to look through, and Denner's hardcore experience is far greater than mine. Does that make him a porn hound? Is that a compliment? Perhaps we should rather call him a connoisseur of hardcore porn. But he seems to slurp it down in large quantities. You only have to look at his PU score (currently 208), and realize his devotion to porn is extremely serious. Denner claims to be Danish, but his enthusiasm seems to be Teutonic. I always thought the Danes were supposed to be laid back and casual, but he is hardcore to the core. (Either I am channeling Wittyguy's PU Forum Awards, or some evil spirit has overcome me momentarily.) :)
As a pro feature, I mentioned there is access to public and private chats. I got away from chats a few years ago. I was spending too much time
watching the girls at Met-art chats. Public chats were free. There were some very attractive, friendly girls at Met-art chats. I was just spending too much time at the public shows. But here is another entry to those chats: some very pretty girls put on softcore shows. It's easy to get addicted to these shows and spend hours watching the girls. Some people find the chats boring, since they are softcore. But I enjoy them too much, and don't want to get hooked again.
There is a current bonus offer that allows you access to differing numbers of bonus sites, depending on which site you join through.
Use the SpunkyBee site to join through:
$29.95 for 30 days membership
10 sites included in your membership (including 18Stream)
Use the 18Stream site to join through:
$34.95/month for 30 days membership
3 sites in your membership
If the site were a solo offering, it would be extemely expensive. But with the current bonus offer of up to 10 of the TonyBucks sites for the price of one, this is a worthwhile network to join.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-3 sizes for photosets: 800, 1200, 4000 px.
-zip file for each size px for each photoset.
-Online slideshow for photosets.
-Can download the videos or view as streaming.
-Material is exclusive.
-Tiny, unobtrusive watermark bottom right hand corner of photos.
-Vids have a larger watermark than the photos, small but not tiny, placed at bottom right corner of the picture.
-No DRM.
-No timeout from site.
-Can rate the model, photoset, and video. But this is a matter of personal taste, and I don't agree with a lot of the scores.
-Simple site navigation. Easy to get to the sets and videos of each model.
-One update per day (photoset or video).
-Most photosets have 100+ pictures each.
Cons:
-Videos download as avi files. No other choice of format.
-Videos download as one file size only (no choice of high, medium, low resolution).
-Downloaded files have no descriptive name. Instead, the download file name is a number with "big", "medium" or "small" attatched, depending on whether you are downloading the big, medium or small px set. Downloaded videos are named with a number and the prefix "zemani-v".
-Search is basic but adequate. Can search by model name, age, or hair color. There is a limited number of models and photosets and videos, so this is not a big con.
Bottom Line:
I resisted joining zemani as long as I could. But some of the models at this site are absolutely mouth-watering. I want to sink my teeth and other
body parts into these gorgeous creatures.
Although there are a nice number of photos and photosets for a site that started in 2006, I can't help wishing there were more photosets for my favorite models. Most models only have 1 or 2 photosets.
Site stats (April 4, 2010):
photos 64,806
galleries 471
videos 130
130 videos sounds like a lot of videos. But like many other softcore sites, the videos are short, most less than 10 minutes in runtime. Even
though the videos might have a gorgeous model as the subject, like most softcore sites, the videos are mainly forgettable. The real value lies in the photosets.
The photographic quality of the videos is good to high, but the videos are just ok. I'm much more into softcore than hardcore, but at most softcore
sites, the videos are just plain boring, no matter how attractive the model is. I don't really understand the psychology of why softcore
photosets of a model can be arousing, but a softcore video of the same model is usually boring. That is my reaction to the videos at softcore teen mega-sites.
The TBP review of this site, release date 6 Mar 2010, states the video "content ranges from softcore nude portraits to pussy spreads, girl-girl erotic posing, and more." I saw a number of videos, not all, and the only
content I saw was strictly softcore: no pussy spread, no girl-girl interaction that went beyond two girls that were nude. I found no solitary
or mutual masturbation, no toys, nothing that remotely approached hardcore porn.
There are some videos where the model performs a strip-tease. But you get better, more exciting strip tease at college night at a bar, where the
strippers are non-professional, probably less attractive than the zemani models, but they put on a much better show than the zemani models.
Also, the canned soundtrack on the videos is obtrusive; it adds nothing to the video, and often sounds annoying.
The models are 18 to very early 20s. Almost all Caucasian.
There is a nice mix of different settings/backgrounds for the photoshoots and videos: interior in a house, in a field, a stream, a lake or sea. Most photosets make nice use of colors in the background, the photosets are mainly nicely focused, the model is nicely featured in the shots. Not all shots are perfect, of course, but the photosets are equal to what you find at met-art, mplstudios, high quality glamor-style softcore photosets.
If you are looking for something more explicit than very softcore nudity, go elsewhere. If you are looking for softcore tease or strip tease, you are better off at a different site.
On a value basis, because the softcore teen mega-sites have far greater content, you are better off joining them first. But this is a nice
addition to the category, and the content will build over time. And the site does feature some absolutely yummy girls.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you get tired of lovely Euro teens, look at Japanese teens for fresh models. I have nothing against Latino and other types, but Japan makes an art form of photographs and videos of lovely young Japanese girls.
-Huge amount of content. Just like Met-art, you get exhausted looking through all the pictures/videos on this site, and know you can't see all the gorgeous girls there are to see. There just isn't enough time, or enough space on your hard drive to download it all, unless your handle is badandy400.
Advertise:
-daily updates. Minimum of 2 movies daily.
-high res DVD quality movies in either AVI or WMV format
-24/7 customer support. All emails answered by a human within 48 hours.
-can search by terms and keywords. Can search by model, photoset, video, censored video, uncensored video, or by category (interracial, amateur, cosplay, popular actress, school girl, mature, etc.).
-no DRM
-easy cancellation
-signup thru CCBill or Verotel
Cons:
-Mosaic (a form of censorship for genitalia) takes getting used to.
-Acting/attitude of female models different from American and Euro style, takes getting used to.
-The photosets are high quality: lovely photos, but not enough of them. This is more of a video site than a photo site.
-The model, movie and photoset information is embedded in the page as a photograph, so it can't be copied and pasted manually into a text file on
your PC. Name of file, model(s), title of movie/photoset, etc. have to be manually typed into your personally created database to keep track of what the downloaded movies/photosets are.
-1 file size for zip photosets. No choice of low, medium, high res photos.
-1 file size for video files. No choice of low, medium, high res video.
-No choice of file type for videos. Some video files download as AVI, some download as WMV.
-Only 10 movie captures (screenshots) to illustrate a movie which could be 2-4 hours.
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-No online streaming to watch the movie.
-Apparently viewing a photoset online counts against your daily download limit of 12 GB. I sent an email asking for verification of this, got no reply from support.
-The 12 GB daily download limit is a lie:
-Day 1 of my membership, I was banned for rest of the day after downloading less than 3 GB. The site states that if you download more than 1 thread at a time, you are counted for each thread. The site does not state that you are mis-counted for muli-thread downloads.
-Day 3 of my membership, banned again for rest of day after downloading less than 3 GB. The form BAN message stated either I exceeded 12 GB or my account had been hacked. I had been careful to only download 1 file at a time before starting the next download.
-Day 4 of membership banned for rest of day before I reached the 12 GB limit. Again, I had been careful to only download 1 file at a time, but was improperly banned anyway.
-Email support is a lie. The site claims the email support is 24/7, and that a human will respond to each email request within 48 hours. I sent numerous requests to email support. I check my email several times a day, both regular in-box and the spam-box. I never received an email response from support. Since I did not get a response after 3 emails to support, I sent an email requesting help to their accounts email address, explaining my problems and the lack of response from support email. Have not received any reply from accounts email.
-No confirmation email of membership purchase from CCBill.
BOTTOM LINE:
The photosets and videos are good-to-high quality (dvd quality, not the super high visual quality of specialty sites like Femjoy for photosets and videos)
stats:
photos: dimensions 768x1050 to 1200x1800
video:resolution: 640x480
Site ease of use: This is a site with a large number of files (videos and photosets) you will want to download. Using a download manager is the only reasonable way to handle the downloading chores, unless you are willing to spend a massive number of hours at the computer keyboard manually
downloading each separate file.
The form BAN message states you are banned from site for 15 hours because you exceeded bandwidth usage or your account was hacked. You are issued username and password by CCBill, and have no control over them.
I paid for a service, access to a site, and did not receive what I paid for. What does the large amount of good quality site content matter to me, if I can't access the content for large periods of time? I believe my score is fair based on the lousy service I am getting. I was generous only because of the large quality content that it is hard as hell to get to.
Edit 1: Was told in an email that multi-thread counter was fixed, you no longer get early ban for using a download manager.
Also, I was given 10 free days because of my site problems.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
pros:
-a lot of content is exclusive to this site
-multiple downloading formats: divx, windows media player, ipod, quicktime
-The videos are in high definition, mainly clear focus, good lighting, good color
-hi def video is listed as 1280x720
-hi def pics listed as up to 2900x4300
-Very attractive European teen models with lovely faces and slender bodies
-Content quantity- Huge number of pix sets and vids.
models : 620
photos : 101282
HDV films : 179
(The HDV films are really video clips of the models, these are not hardcore or softcore movies with a storyline.)
-No DRM
-No downloading limits
Cons:
pros (continued):
-secret word is easy to read.
-small, unobtrusive watermarks.
-updates: a new photoset or vid every 1-2 days.
Cons:
-expensive. $34.95 (recurring) monthly fee. This gives you membership to 2 sites, justteensite and justeenmovie. But the justteenmovie site has tiny content, that you can download entire site in a few days, if you think any of the content is worth downloading and keeping. There were no updates at justteenmovie in the 30 days that I belonged to that site.
-advertise friendly support, but I sent email asking for help over 30 days ago, never got a response.
-basic site navigation is OK, but could be much easier to use. Met-art has more models and picture sets, but it's easier to find models and picture sets at Met-art than at Justteensite.
The search feature could be improved a great deal.
-jitter in some of the HDV vids. While you get very sharp images, it's annoying to see the images jittering on the screen while you watch the video.
Bottom Line:
cons (continued):
-minor annoyance-Timeout disconnected from the site and have to re-login.
-no resume support for zip file downloads of picture sets. These are large zip files, so if you get disconnected, have to restart the download from the start.
-zip files for the high resolution pic sets only. No zip file for the low resolution pics in a photoset.
-model bio data can often have errors or fantasy. Age of model is often given as 18 or 19, because
this is a teen site. But I've seen models who are in their 20s listed as 18 or 19 (these are
models I've seen on other sites or in pornstar databases). Also, country of origin can be wrongly listed. The site is selling youth, so don't let the facts get in the way, as for age. As for country, I've seen Russian girls listed as being from Argentina at 1 site. Porn is fantasy anyway, so why not Argentina?
Bottom line:
This is a major teen softcore site. Huge number of very attractive models, photosets, videos. Well worth a 1-month membership if you've never belonged to it.
Also it's worth revisiting the site after a 6-12 month absence to catch up on the updated photosets and videos.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: if you join any one of the TMW (Teen Mega World) sites, I recommend joining through the main portal, the TMW site itself.
This makes navigation and searching the content far easier, than if you joined one of the satellite sites. The price to join is the same for all the sites, so do yourself a favor and join through the main TMW site directly.
These are pros for the TMW network:
-Daily update.
-High resolution images (in the photo sets).
-UHD 4K videos in the last few years.
-HTTPS login and member pages. Note: sometimes the site is HTTPS, sometimes it's not. I've never seen a site or network act like this.
-5,000+ videos.
-2000+ models: the average model is a female teen, and the girls range from slightly above average to cute to very attractive.
-30+ sites covering a wide variety of teen niches.
Membership in any one of the TMW sites gives you full access to all the network sites. There are no sites requiring a premium membership.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
Cons:
-The main con is that the last update was 2011-05-30. This is an archive site.
-The second major con is that the site is small: 31 videos (with matching photosets) total.
-The photosets are screencaps, that are not good quality. The clarity and focus could definitely be improved. Which is a shame, because a lot of the models are cute, and the site has a large photoset for each video.
-No zip file for the photosets. But I doubt you would want to collect these photosets: even though the girls are cute, the photos are poor-quality screencaps made from the video.
-Login and member pages are sometimes not secure. Which makes hacking easier.
-Vendo and other billing agents are the default billers. I've never had a problem with Vendo (or with any of their other billing agents), but I'm more familiar with CCBill and Epoch, who make cancelling easy.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
There are many reason why TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks:
-The models range from slightly above average to cute to really attractive.
-The network has spent a lot of time and effort and money upgrading their content in the last few years. This is reflected in the improved quality of the videos and photosets. They now offer videos posted in the last few years in definitions ranging from 360p through 2160p (Ultra High Defintion).
The sets are clean and they use good-quality equipment to film and photograph the models.
-The models are Russian girls (or from the surrounding area). Russian girls are taught from a young age how to respond to stunt cock: the stunt cock slips his tongue or fingers into the girl's pussy, and she's ready to rock and roll.
Sometimes it doesn't even take a tongue or finger to turn her on: the stunt cock slipping his cock out of his pants is also a sure turn-on with these prime Russian sluts.
Until I started watching porn, I never realized that teen Russian girls can be just as horny as any American male teen.
-The membership price is low: PU has a discounted first month's membership price of 14.95/month, renews at $14.95/month.
-The teens are not just mainly cute, but also enthusiastic about the sex, and seem to really be getting off. There isn't a lot of harshness and cruelty in the sex, and the girls show their enjoyment with a lot of the moans, squeals, and cries while getting pounded by the stunt cocks.
-If you are willing to pay for a 1 year membership, you can sometimes find a very discounted price for $90 or less for a 1-year membership.
The theme of the Squirting Virgin is girls who squirt (ejaculate) during orgasm.
I always thought that the squirting was more like the girls were pissing, rather than having some sexual fluid eject from the vagina. Which would be smelly as hell, as well as messy.
But some people believe that the squirting is not pissing.
There are fans of girls who squirt.
So for those fans, this site would be interesting: cute girls who squirt during orgasm.
Except the site is small (31 videos total), and has not updated since May 2011.
The videos come in the following definitions: 360p, 480p, 720p.
That is for streaming and downloading.
The sets are cheap, because the vids were shot when the network was still a low-budget platform for cheap, hardcore teen porn.
You can easly tell the vids were made years ago, compared to the higher quality videos and photosets that have been posted the last several years.
But if you are a fan of squirting, it's still worthwhile to view the vids because the models are cute and the action can be hot.
The basic action is that the stunt cock starts by arousing the girl, fondling her all over, sticking his fingers in her pussy, ass, mouth.
Then he uses his cock to fuck her mercilessly, in her pussy, ass, mouth, squeezing and slapping her tits and face and ass, tieing her with ropes, gagging her with her panties or a rag, forcing her into uncomfortable positions to show her he is her master. Also, the stunt cock often uses a dildo to arouse the girl. There is a strong element of bdsm in these videos: the stunt cock treats the girl like a piece of meat, but she willingly goes along, and even though uncomfortable, she is able to smile and laugh when it's over.
The main problems with the site: it's small, only 31 videos. And stopped updating in 2011.
So I'm giving the site a score of 84.
However, the network updates daily, and there is a ton of good-quality teen hardcore videos at the other sites, covering a wide variety of niches.
If the site started updating again, the score would be raised.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discounted price of $14.95 for the first month, recurs at $29.95/month.
-The model catalog is mainly attractive girls in late teens to twenties.
-Downloading is unlimited and free with membership, unlike some sites that want to charge extra for downloading. I'm excluding the 2-day trial membership, which does not allow downloading and limits to 10 the number of videos you can watch.
-Unlimited streaming.
-You might be given a membership to Adult Time network, which is the crown jewel of porn network sites. Membership is apparently given out randomly when joining one of the Adult Time network sites.
-Customer and technical support is 24/7.
-Videos have a photoset. The photoset has 2 zip files, one in regular definition, one in high-res definition.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor. This is a high-grade site of professional porn with mainly attractive models in hardcore porn.
-Pre-checked cross-sale. But this is standard for porn sites.
-If you join 21 Naturals and don't get the Adult Time membership for free, you should be really disappointed: The Adult Time network is the crown jewel of porn sites, with an amazing amount of porn (over 50,000 videos, sites covering a wide range of niches).
-This is hardcore porn, but some PU members would prefer a harder, rougher edge to the porn. The site approach is more heartcore, where the man makes love to the girl, instead of having rough sex.
-Also, the man often kisses the model's feet, sucks on them, whatever. While it's not a turn-off, to me it's a waste of time. Tits, pussy and ass are what the guy should be focusing on.
Bottom Line:
Site theme:
The site theme: Natural models with natural beauty.
3 sub-themes: sex, anal sex, and foot fetish.
Mainly European models.
The site used to be part of a network of around 15 sites.
But last year, the site was folded into the Adult Time network, which has over 100 sites (Adult Time calls its sites "channels").
However, the Adult Time network, even though it ended the beta testing in January 2019,
seems to be somewhat random in what it offers:
-If you join one of the Adult Time member sites, you might be given a free add-on membership to Adult Time. Or not. One PU member recently stated that he joined 21 Sextury while the site was advertising that members would get access to the Adult Time network.
He never got access to Adult Time. He emailed customer support, and received no reply.
I believe that free memberships to Adult Time when you join one of their member sites are still being given out on a random basis: you either get it, or not.
As I've mentioned in several earlier reviews, Adult Time is a massive network:
If you can get it for free as an add-on to a discounted membership price to one of its member sites (holidays are the best time to get discounted porn site memberships), or directly through the Adult Time site with a discounted membership price, I think that is probably the best bargain in porn sites today:
-Adult Time has over 140 channels (sites are called channels in the Adult Time network).
You get access to over 50,000 hardcore videos: many of which are of excellent video quality.
The Adult Time network is not a massive collection of low grade sites
Instead, it's a massive collection of high grade sites, many of which would be joining separately, except that an Adult Time membership gives you access to them in a single join (assuming you get Adult Time network access).
I believe that Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today.
However, opinions vary, and others might feel the network is disappointing, or just OK.
Opinions vary, tastes differ.
I'm giving 21 Naturels a score of 83.
But if you get the Adult Time network for free as a bonus with a membership to 21 Naturals, then the score rises to 95.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND EDIT. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE. MY EYES ARE OLD, BUT MY HEART STILL GOES PITTER PAT FOR A LOVELY WOMAN.
(BUT MY WILLY IS ALSO GETTING OLD, AND DOESN'T RESPOND AS FAST AS MY HEART.)
SMELL THE ROSES WHILE YOU CAN, BOYS AND GIRLS. YOUTH IS FOR THE YOUNG. OLD AGE IS FOR THE MEMORIES. SO GATHER YE ROSEBUDS WHILE YE MAY.
MY THOUGHTS ON THE WORLD OF PORN TODAY:
PROS
-OVERVIEW: THE LIFE EROTIC IS PART OF THE METART NETWORK.
THE CUSTOMER SUPPORT IS FAST TO RESPOND, POLITE, AND NORMALLY HELPFUL. THE ONLY MAIN IMPROVEMENT I CAN SEE IS TO OFFER A LIVE CHAT VERSION OF CUSTOMER SUPPORT, SO THE RESPONSE TIME WOULD BE EVEN FASTER THAN EMAIL.
-YOU GET THE BASIC METART STRUCTURE FOR THE SITE:
-EASY NAVIGATION FOR THE SITE.
-PHOTO SETS ARE OFFERED IN 3 DEFINITIONS: LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH.
-HIGH QUALITY PHOTO SETS.
-OUTSTANDING PHYSICAL BEAUTY OF THE MODELS: METART AND ITS SATELLITE SITES HAVE SOME OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN ON THE PLANET.
Cons:
-CONS ARE BASICALLY MINOR.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. THIS IS STANDARD FOR PORN SITES. EVEN THOUGH THE METART SITES ARE PREMIUM SITES, THEY STILL USE THIS LOW-GRADE MARKETING TRICK TO HOOK THE UNWARY SUBSCRIBER.
-THIS IS PLUS AND MINUS. ON A PSYCHOLOGICAL BASIS, A PERSON TENDS TO GET BORED WITH PHYSICAL BEAUTY AFTER A WHILE, SINCE ITS ON DISPLAY SO FREQUENTLY BY SO MANY WOMEN.
-THE SITE OFFERS "STAFF SELECTION" VIDEOS FOR SALE. PRICED AT $3.99 AND $4.99 FOR 720P AND 1080P VERSIONS. RUNTIME 15-20 MINUTES.
THEY SAY "OWN IT NOW", "YOURS TO KEEP FOREVER". BUT THE LIFE EROTIC DOES NOT USE DRM (DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE), SO ANY VIDEOS YOU DOWNLOAD FROM THE SITE ARE "YOURS TO OWN" ANYWAY.
-SLOW UPDATE RATE.
YOU GET ONE NEW PHOTOSET EVERY 2 OR 3 DAYS.
YOU GET ONE NEW (FREE) VIDEO EVERY 1 OR 2 DAYS.
Bottom Line:
THERE ARE MANY COMPETING SOFTCORE SITES (MPL STUDIOS, FEMJOY, ETC.) THAT OFFER A CATALOG OF WOMEN WHO ARE CUTE TO ATTRACTIVE TO GORGEOUS TO BEAUTIFUL.
CALL IT AN EMBARRASSMENT OF RICHES. YOU JUST DON'T VALUE WAS IS SO READILY AVAILABLE THE WAY YOU SHOULD.
WHAT SITES GIVE YOU THE MOST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK?
WE ARE FOCUSING ON SOFTCORE HERE.
THE MAIN SOFTCORE SITES, IN MY OPINION INCLUDE: METART (THE MAIN METART SITE), MPLSTUDIOS, FEMJOY. THERE ARE PLENTY OF OTHER GOOD SOFTCORE SITES ON THE INTERNET, BUT THE 3 I LISTED ARE THE GIANTS OF THE FIELD: WITH A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF BACKLOG PHOTO SETS COVERING OVER 10 YEARS OF HISTORY.
THE 3 SITES EMPHASIZE LATE TEEN MODELS (ALTHOUGH SOME MODELS IN THE SOFTCORE FIELD CAN LAST MUCH LONGER THAN HARDCORE MODELS. SOME OF THE FAVORITE SOFTCORE MODELS CAN LAST 10 YEARS OR MORE, AND HAVE DEBUT SETS AND SETS COVERING OVER 10 YEARS WORTH OF APPEARANCES.
-CAN THE LIFE EROTIC MEASURE UP TO THE 3 GIANTS OF THE SOFTCORE FIELD?
ON A REALISTIC BASIS, THE LIFE EROTIC IS LIKE A SECOND TIER OFFERING:
IT'S A FINE SITE, BUT IN COMPARISON THE METART, MPL STUDIOS, AND FEMJOY, THE LIFE EROTIC COMES IN A DISTANT 4TH PLACE.
-METART HAS 19,517 PHOTO SETS.
-METART HAS 3,588 MODELS.
-METART HAS 285 CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHERS, SO YOU GET A WIDE VARIETY OF ARTISTIC STYLES.
YOU PROBABLY WON'T APPRECIATE ALL THE PHOTO SETS OFFERED, BECAUSE SOME OF THEM GET TOO ARTISTIC OR FANCIFUL. BUT THESE ARE PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHERS WHO HAVE TO PASS METART'S STANDARDS FOR SUBMISSION. METART HAS 1,576 FILMS (SHORT VIDEOS WITH A RUNTIME OF 10-15 MINUTES).
EVEN THOUGH THE FILMS USUALLY FEATURE LOVELY TO GORGEOUS MODELS THAT ARE NAKED, MOST OF THE VIDEOS ARE BORING AND A WASTE OF TIME VIEWING. THE MORE RECENT VIDEOS ARE MAKING AN EFFORT TO BE MORE EROTIC: THE MODELS ARE ALLOWED TO TOUCH THEMSELVES (NOT HARD MASTURBATION, BUT A HINT OF MASTURBATION, A HINT OF EROTIC TEASE).
-METART CON-A LOT OF CURRENT PHOTOGRAPHERS PUT THE MODELS INTO TWISTED POSITIONS TO HIGHLIGHT THE PUSSY OR ASSHOLD OF THE MODELS. THAT'S WHAT METART MEMBERS SEEM TO WANT. IT'S NOT MY CUP OF TEA. I PREFER A STANDARD SHOT OF THE ENTIRE MODEL, EITHER FRONT OR BACK, WITHOUT A LOT OF TWISTS OR CONTORTIONS TO FOCUS ON AN ASSHOLE OR PUSSY. YES, THOSE ARE EROTIC FEATURES, BUT GIVE IT SOME CLASS, PEOPLE. THIS IS NOT HARDCORE, BUT THE EDGES ARE STARTING TO BLUR BETWEEN SOFTCORE AND HARDCORE. AND METART IS DEFINITELY ADDING A SLIGHT HARDCORE EDGE TO THEIR SITE.
-MPL STUDIOS
-AN OUTSTANDING SOFTCORE SITE.
-GREAT PHOTOGRAPHY THAT SHOWCASES THE NATURAL BEAUTY OF MODELS.
-740 VIDEOS. THE VIDEOS ARE MORE EROTIC THAN THE OLDER METART VIDEOS.
-ALMOST 324,000 IMAGES.
-THE MODELS ARE OUTSTANDING. ALL 3 TOP SOFTCORE SITES FEATURE GIRLS THAT ARE CUTE TO GORGEOUS.
-419 MODELS
-ABOUT 5,000 PHOTOSETS.
FEMJOY
UPDATES:1 OR 2 PHOTO SETS PER DAY.
1 VIDEO PER WEEK.
MODELS: 1614+
PHOTO SETS: 8,763+
VIDEOS: 715+
SITE STARTED IN 2004, SO YOU HAVE A HUGE BACKLOG OF PHOTO SETS AND VIDEOS, FEATURING LOVELY YOUNG WOMEN.
THE TOP 3 SOFTCORE SITES BLOW THE LIFE EROTIC OUT OF THE WATER ON 2 FACTORS:
THE AMOUNT OF CONTENT
THE NUMBER OF MODELS
THE TOP SITE, IN MY OPINION, IS METART:
IT HAS AN UPDATE RATE OF 4 NEW UPDATES PER DAY.
THAT WOULD BE EITHER PHOTO SETS ONLY, OR A COMBINATION OF PHOTOSETS PLUS A VIDEO.
ON THE FIRST DAY OF EACH MONTH, METART HAS 6 UPDATES FOR THAT DAY.
METART HAS THE MOST BACKLOG OF PHOTOSETS OF ANY SOFTCORE GLAMOR SITE.
IN MY OPINION, MPL STUDIOS IS SECOND. FANTASTIC MODELS, GREAT PHOTOGRAPHY, VIDEOS ARE SLIGHTLY MORE EROTIC THAN THE VIDEOS AT METART.
FEMJOY IS THIRD. THAT IS VERY SUBJECTIVE. FEMJOY FEATURES A CATALOG OF MODELS THAT IS OUTSTANDING.
A HUGE NUMBER OF PHOTO SETS.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Advertises:
-6,000+ exclusive videos
-2,000+ pornstars. Many of them attractive.
-Unlimited access (no download limit).
-Weekly updates
-14+ bonus sites.
-Videos have a matching photoset.
-Content is advertised as exclusive. This is in spite of the fact that much of the content is from DVDs.
-Can post comments on the scenes and photos. Negative comments are allowed (other sites often remove negative comments)
-Long time before site timeout due to inactivity.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Video quality varies. Site has been around since 1998, so the newer content is much higher quality.
-Because of the massive amount of content, it can get exhausting to search through the material.
The basic site structure is plain: They have an excellent model index: Nice-sized thumbnails to picture each model, with links to her videos. But with 2,000+ models, it's a lot of work going through all the pretty girls to find what you want. You can organize the model list alphabetically. Can search by model name, most popular, most recent, etc.
-A large part of each page is filled with ads for site models. It would be better to use the space to show only what is useful to the member.
-The photosets are screencaps of an individual scene. The quality of the screencaps is just OK. The screencaps at Teen Mega World (another long-time hardcore teen network) are much better. And the screencaps at a few other hardcore sites are much better.
Bottom Line:
Many of the videos have a plotline or backstory.
The pornstars are not Academy-award winning actresses yet, but the plot gives meaning to the sex.
And many of the plots are interesting.
"From A First Love To A Distant Memory", starring Melissa Moore and Kimmy Granger, is a wonderful example:
You learn how Melissa and Kimmy met and began a passionate love affair. However, Kimmy has to move far away, and Melissa will miss her. This makes their current sex both sad and sweet.
There are other videos of Melissa where she is seen with other girls. And one scene with her and 5 or more men in a gang bang. So the love life of a pornstar can be complicated.
It helps if the pornstar is bisexual, because then the search for new partners will be less of a burden.(joke).
Actually, the plotlines can be interesting beyond a simple tale of lust or seduction.
For example, " Deep Secret Desires Become Reality For Raylin", featuring Raylin Ann.
Raylin is a sweet, innocent girl who is getting a massage from her step brother, Karlo.
The massage is innocent. But Karlo's hands drop down Raylin's shoulders to just above her breasts.
Will they have sex?
But then the phone rings, and Raylin's mother is on the line.
The tension rises: will this phone call spell the end of Karlo's attempt to seduce Raylin?
But as the Website text explains: "Not even a phone call from their mother could distract her from sucking on his cock, she was quickly spread wide and fucking her way from fantasy to reality and swallowing it all up."
What a great story line! The actors are not yet Academy-award level, but the writers certainly are.
What surprises me, though, is that obviously Raylin and her step brother have not previously had sex.
When the brother stops massaging Raylin's shoulders to allow her to speak to the mother on the cell phone.
he unzips his pants and pulls out his cock.
This so excites Raylin that she does not need any further seduction, just the sight of her step brother's cock (and maybe the sound of her mother's voice on the phone) is sufficient to make her start sucking and humping with glee).
These videos explore the inner cravings of the female animal.
Which I never understood before watching porn videos.
Although the videos have more of a storyline/plot than most hardcore sites, the site is not really glamcore or heartcore. The plot is there, where there is supposed to be a romantic or sexual relationship between the girl and her partners, but what is lacking is the high quality visuals of a glamcore site: X-Art, Blacked, Tushy and some other sites put a major focus on high quality visuals: great lighting, great definition, solid colors, good camera-work, expensive or nice costuming, etc.
New Sensations does not reach those levels for any of those factors.
New Sensations has many of the most attractive models in the industry.
But they don't present each model to make her appear like a vision of loveliness.
Before the appearance of glamcore sites a few years back, New Sensations would have been an outstanding site:
based on the quality of their models, the storyline, the professional level of the scenes. The photo shoots would be slightly disappointing compared to what's now available at hardcore sites.
However, compared to the glamcore sites, New Sensations score drops because the visuals are below what's offered at the newer glamcore sites.
Giving the site a score of 83. That's very subjective. How much you will enjoy the site depends on your personal preferences. There is a huge amount of content. Professionally shot. With a storyline that is more interesting than the visual scene itself. If they could combine the storylines with a glamcore approach, New Sensations could be an outstanding network. However, that would be very expensive, with money spent on more expensive sets, better costumes, more professional camera-work, etc.
And the storylines would have to agree with each other. Which would be a major problem.
For example, a girl is a lesbian: she loves another girl, who moves away.
Then the girl has a gang-bang with 5 men.
Does that make sense?
(I think I may have overdosed on Porn, because I'm asking for Porn scenes to make sense.)
Based on the amount of content, which is professionally shot, and the level of attraciveness of the models, the network gives you good value for your money. But I personally prefer more glamcore sites, like Blacked, Tushy, or X-Art, where you get less content, but higher quality visuals and models who are made to appear stunning.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A huge number of clips of nude women in movies and tv shows.
-You can do searches in a number of ways. But I am not a fan of their search, or the site structure. See my cons.
-Low membership price with PU discount: $9.95/month.
-This is a very brief tag to describe each scene: Sexy; Sexy, underwear; Sexy, thong; Sexy, bikini; Nude, breasts;
The tags are basically helpful, except sometimes they aren't. For example, some tags state "Nude, breasts", but the clip just shows a breast that is covered by a bra. I don't consider that nude. Just like I don't consider a woman wearing a bikini or underwear as nude, which is what some "nude" tagged clips are.
-You can do search by many different factors:
Actress name. title. keyword(age, nationality, hair color, etc.)
-Automatic login to site (if cookies are enabled).
Don't need to enter username and password.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Navigation is poor.
I don't know why more people haven't complained about the site structure, which was designed by an idiot.
-The quality/definition of the clips varies. Some clips are high definition, other clips are standard definition. A lot of the value of a nude clip depends on how well you can view the images, and the colorization (and degradation) from the original source).
-This is a personal opinion. But even though some of the clips show nudity, they often lose the impact and potency of the original scene. Maybe it's because the clips are too short: They lose the build-up to the scene.
There is no automatic notice that you are logged in to the site.
Most sites have some indicator (in the address bar or someplace else) that tells you you are logged in to the site.
I was searching for the log-in link a couple of times, before I realized I was already in the site itself.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION BELOW:
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
-The site was not designed for members ease of use.
One example:
There is a blog. One blog entry is "Top Ten Nude Debuts of 2016".
To show you the top ten nude debuts of 2016, the site does not give you a list of the actresses/models.
Instead, it gives you a slideshow of screencaps of the actresses. That you have to click through.
The name of each actress is in tiny letters at the bottom of the screencap, that is difficult to read.
One member comment on this blog entry:
"How about you make the name and titles big enough to read. Doesn't help me if I don't know where to look."
If you fiddle around, you can enlarge each screen cap (with a few mouse-clicks), to be able to read the name of the actress, and the movie she appears nude in.
But why not make it easy for members to read the actress name and movie, without the mouse clicks?
And without additional clicks to find the next actress on the list?
-There is a learning curve to using this site. I am getting old. So it's irritating if the site navigation is not simple and easy to use. If I have problems searching the site contents, I enjoy the site less than otherwise. And this site was created by someone who knew the foibles of the site structure, and figured the members would figure out the foibles by themselves.
-Many of the photos are screencaps.
-Most clips are very short. Two or three minutes runtime. Many clips are 30 seconds or shorter.
-Most of content is softcore.
BOTTOM LINE:
The Mr. Skin clips are both good and bad: Good, to give you a slight taste of the nude appearances of these celebreties/actresses, but not enough to fill your appetite if you remember the original movies in any detail.
-Cons: the quality in some the clips is just OK. The clips are not high definition, even when taken from a standard commercial movie. Either the copying is done poorly, or some other factor controls the poor image quality. Todays porn consumers are accustomed to the high quality or ultra high quality available at many porn sites.
For example, the Two Moon Junction (1988) clips seem poor definition.
Two Moon Junction (1988) was directed and written by Zalman King, who also did 9½ Weeks (1986), Wild Orchid (1989), and the Red Shoe Diary series (1990s) on cable.
Part of the appeal of Zalman King's work was the high definition (for the time), vivid images, strong colors, erotic content, along with main-stream actors/actresses and plot structure.
The Zalman King clips should be one of the site highlights. But they are disappointing.
-The site will appeal mainly to fans of celebrity nudity.
The problem is:
For a softcore site, the site does not offer high-grade photos or clips that we want.
There is probably no hardcore sex offered for hardcore fans.
So bottom line: this is mainly for celebrity softcore fans, who want to see their idols in brief nude scenes.
I doubt that many PU members would remain a member for more than one month.
This site would have much more value if this were not the internet age: where the internet will give you many of these same images and clips for free.
Yahoo now allows nudity in its clips and movies.
But for a simple way to access brief celebrity nudity, the site will have its fans.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-High definition videos.
-Videos have good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control.
-Content is dated.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Easy login to site.
-Can watch videos streaming or download.
-Member pages are ad free.
-Has a link to "Free Cams" and to "Live Cams".
-List of models, with thumbnail of the model.
Cons:
-Last updated on 2012-01-07. So this is an archive site.
-Has links to Rabbit's Porn Reviews. Not really a negative, but why the site has links to a porn review site seems odd.
-Search is OK, but could be improved. You click on a model's name, and it lists the network sites she appears in. But it doesn't list her appearances at each site. And to get to the sites listed, have to manually switch to the specific site (instead of using a simple hot link). And then you can search for the model's appearances at that specific site. The Teen Mega World network, by contrast, makes it easier to switch between sites, and also to find the model's appearances, by using simple hot links.
-Uncheck the pre-checked cross-sale at signup, or you will have subscribed to a trial offer you probably don't want.
-In the categories search, they list 22 videos under college. But out of the 22 videos, all the models looked like porn models. No teens or fresh-faced girls at this site.
Bottom Line:
Videos sex scenes: man and woman having sex, lesbian, masturbation, toys, etc.
42 of the 82 videos are lesbian.
Instead of calling the site lowartfilms, they could just as easily called it highartfilms. The sex is raw, but there is an erotic or sensous element in the videos. It goes beyond bread and butter fucking, and tries to make the sex passionate or exciting. They do this by providing unusual settings for the model, and by using costumes that are sensual or erotic. And the sex, while raw, has a buildup with a lot of kissing and touching.
Models are in their twenties or thirties. Medium to large breasts.
Site statistics:
Stopped updating 2012-01-07. So this is an archive site.
Number of videos: 82
80 of the 82 videos have high definition file option available.
The main sites include a boatload of hardcore videos.
And the secondary and niche sites, while smaller, have a variety of videos that will give you plenty of videos to browse through.
So for $9.95 for the first month (with the PU discount), you get a massive amount of hardcore videos.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-Content is dated.
-Because it's a small site, easy to navigate.
-The nylons the girls wear add dash of color to their costumes.
-Member pages are relatively ad free.
-Can watch videos streaming or download.
-Download speeds are good. I regularly get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-Has a link to "free" live cam shows. But these are mainly a waste of time.
Cons:
-Small site. Only 25 videos.
-No regular updates. Last update was 2012-04-05. So it's more like a small archive site.
-Needs more stunt cocks. Only 3 or 4 stunt cocks featured.
-Videos can be streamed, but only one definition: no choice of high, medium or low quality.
-Videos can be downloaded, in high or medium quality. No low quality option. Also, judging from the file size of the download videos, the
quality of the "high quality" files is really more like a medium quality video at other sites. And the file size of the "medium quality" videos is more like a low quality video at other sites.
For example, a video with a run time of 15 minutes has a high quality file size of 558 MB. And the medium quality file size is 170 MB.
-Only one file size for the photos. And since the photosets are a record of the video shoot, the photos themselves have little artistic or erotic
value. But if all you want is photos of naked girls, the pics will do the job.
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-Photos have a medium-sized watermark on lower right side.
-No biograhical data on the models except for age. But the age given is not tied to any date or video the model appears in.
BOTTOM LINE:
-Theme is girls wearing nylons having sex.
-Small site catering to people with a fetish for nylons.
There is the normal variety of sex shown: masturbation, boy-girl vaginal and anal sex, blowjobs.
Site stats:
Videos: 25
Photosets: 25
The photosets are a record of the video shoot.
Most of the sites in the Teen Mega World network are integrated. So can search for a single model, and the results will include her appearances at all the network sites. Can also search by top rated scenes, your personal favorite scenes, type of sex scene (lesbian, anal, group, squirting, toys, etc.).
Join through the Teen Mega World site for $19.95/month, with the PU discount, which gives access to the NylonsX site.
Joining directly through the NylonsX site costs $29.95/month, and does not give you anything more than the Teen Mega World membership.
-Most valuable feature is that access to this site is included with a Teen Mega World membership. Teen Mega World, with a PU discount of 19.95/month, recurring, offers a huge network of hardcore teen videos. Many of the videos are good quality, and the network has hundreds of Eastern European teen models, many of which are very attractive.
Giving this site a score of 83. Site deserves that score because it's part of the Teen Mega World network. If the site was a standalone site, the score would be much lower, maybe 70 or less.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Videos: Small watermark appears briefly at different times in a video.
Not obtrusive.
-Photos: Small watermark.
-No DRM.
-Videos and photosets have posting date.
-Site has a models list, which is a an alphabetical list/pages of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, with the number of photosets and videos for each model.
-Very long period before site timeout.
-Can watch videos streaming or download. The streaming option is not very good. You get a small window to watch the video. Much better to download the video and watch it on your PC. Streaming option is OK to watch briefly to see if the video will be of interest. But trying to fast-forward the streaming video does not work well: the video stops playing, and it's hard to get it to resume at the place you want to try next.
-Zip file for photosets.
-Large number of models (320+).
Cons:
-The software for viewing individual photos is clunky. There should be an easier way to view individual photos.
-Navigation is basic. It should be easier to browse through the photosets and videos. The videos and photosets are split into two separate sections, but it should be easier to browse through the site contents.
-The search is basic, and could be improved by being able to search for the title of a photoset or video, or being able to search for a specific
type of content such as type of sex action, etc.
-No model bio or information on the model is offered.
-One size only for each photoset. No choice of low, medium, high quality photosets.
Bottom Line:
There are a number of attractive models at this site. The site theme is young teen girls who are amateurs. These are not girls being naughty, but
attractive young girls who are filmed on camera enjoying their sexuality: by themselves (masturbation), with their female friends (lesbian), less often with a boy. It's good clean enjoyment and fun, not dirty, not abusive, not rough.
-Large number of models (320+). The models are teen or early twenties, white Eastern European girls. Mainly slender, mainly small-breasted.
Number of models at this site: 320
Number of photos per photoset: 40 - 100 photos.
videos:
number: 800+
runtime: 15-20 minutes
size: 200 MB - 1 GB+, depending on which quality you choose.
Format: WMV
Definition/quality: medium, high, HD (the best, highest quality)
Photosets:
number: 1,000+
Photo dimensions: 1000 x 1500 pixels width x height.
Photo size: about 200 KB.
-Update rate:
1 photoset per day, average.
1 video every 2 days, average.
I don't know why the the photosets at 18 Only Girls are so unsatisfying.
The quality of the photosets is far below what you find at a glamor-style site like Met-art or MPL Studios, in terms of definition, appeal, etc. The style of the photosets is like what is shown at sites like Teen Stars Magazine (an archive site) or My Precious Virgins. Except that what
is shown at Teen Stars Magazine and My Precious Virgins is done much better. The photosets at 18 Only Girls are like a pale imitation of the
much better photosets at the other two sites. And compared to glamor photo sites like Met-art or MPL Studios, the photosets at 18 Only Girls are
almost worthless. The photosets are like snapshots from the 1960s or 1970s. Even though they are nude photosets, the 18 Only Girls photosets lack sexiness. My guess is that the lack of sexual appeal is due to the washed-out appearance of the colors in the photos.
Content appears to be shared between the 18 Only Girls site and the Young Legal Porn site. This is true of photosets and videos. I am looking at a
recent photoset at 18 Only Girls, titled
"Horny_coed_girl_striping_and_toying_her_snatch_1295819441_only_674", with the model named Drew. But even though the photoset is posted at 18 Only
Girls, each photo has a YoungPorn.net watermark.
There seems to be some confusion in naming The Young Legal Porn site: The Young Legal Porn site is called both Young Legal Porn and is also called Young Porn. The site is advertised as Young Legal Porn, but the address bar of the site itself uses YoungPorn instead, and the watermarks on the photosets show YoungPorn.net.
The videos, unlike the photosets, have value. The videos are professionally shot, and are very high quality: Good to excellent lighting, focus, definition, camera-work. There are a large number of videos at this site worth watching, as long as
you are satisfied with a softcore approach to pretty young teens: the sex is solo, or lesbian, or some boy-girl, but it's not hard-edged or abusive.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Multiple download formats:
--WMV: low, medium, high quality.
--MPG.
--MOV.
-Streaming: low, medium, high quality.
-Videos and photosets are paired.
-Content is dated.
-Screenshots and a photoset to illustrate each video.
-Zip files for photosets.
-No site timeout. Edit: there is a site timeout, but it takes hours of inactivity before you have to re-login.
-Videos are very high definition: Size 1GB+. But you get high clarity.
Cons:
-Last update is dated 05 September, 2010. That's 2 months ago. Before that, they were updating about every 5 days with a video or photoset.
-Only 1 size for photos.
-Slow-loading system for viewing photos.
-The members page listing the site contents is cluttered with advertising for other sites.
-Models not listed for some videos and photosets.
-No model bios.
-Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Other search parameters are fairly useless (date added, title, top rated, most viewed).
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. About a year ago I posted a comment that joining this site made little economic sense because you only gained access to this single site, and not to any of the other sites in this network, for a price of $29.95/month. And the contents of this site, by itself, did not justify a price of $29.95/month. A year later, for the same price, you can get access to up to 10 of the sites in this network, depending on which site you join through.
The TonyBucks network is teen sites. What makes this site different from the other sites in the network? I don't know. Many of the sites are interchangeable. But as a marketing ploy, they put some videos in this site, some in a different site, and each site is supposed to have a different theme. You could put most of the TonyBucks videos into one giant site, but then it would be much harder to search through all the videos. So separating the videos into different sites makes good consumer sense, except when they rename a video clip and put it into more than one site. But the duplicated videos are not very common.
There are around 73 videos and 73 photosets at this site.
Sample data for a high definition video:
runtime: 25 minutes 14 seconds
size: 1.12 GB
frame width x height: 1600 x 900
total bitrate: 6336 kbps
frame rate: 25 frames/sec
Type of content:
Sex in most normal varieties: vaginal, anal, bj, cunnilingus.
Mainly boy-girl. Some scenes where you have "group" sex, but it's not very groupy: you have a boy-girl having sex, and maybe 1 or more other people watching them, or maybe the other people are having boy-girl sex. A limited amount of 2 guys on a single girl. A few scenes of solo female masturbation or 2-girl lesbian action. But the basic theme is one couple (boy-girl) sex.
The sex is not rough or abusive. It's friendly sex between two horny teens.
The site is your basic hardcore teen site, with high definition videos that are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus, good colors.
The photosets are basically a record of the video shoot. But the photos are high quality, not screencaps, and worth viewing for themselves. This site has the best quality photos of the entire network. I don't know who the photographer is, but he should have been hired to do all the photos at this network. The photos are large size (about 400-1,000 KB each).
You are not getting the glamor-style videos of X-art or the glamor photos of Met-Art. But the quality is very good at this site.
On the other hand, the sex action is your basic sex, with less roughness than at many hardcore sites, but it doesn't grab your interest, or impress you.
I'm giving this site a score of 83, for the value of the site contents, and the network contents. The site would be very expensive to join if it didn't include network access.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login. Enter username and password, which can be saved.
-Updates with new series and older series. Offering parodies of Mad Men, Fast Times At Ridgemont High, Twilight, etc.
-Huge amount of content. 1722 Gb.
-Wide variety of content. 4637 movies, with wide variation of sexual activity.
-Can stream or download videos:
--Stream in high or low definition. Many videos can be streamed in HD (supposed to be higher than the regular "high definition" used at their site).
--Can download as high or low definition WMV file.
-No DRM
-No download limits.
-No site timeout.
Cons:
-Uncheck the pre-checked agreement to join another site on signup, or you will be charged for a trial membership to another site.
-Poor search engine.
-Video quality (definition) could be improved. This is basic DVD quality video. Many PU members want better quality videos to watch, and will
complain about much of the video content at this site. But the newer material is higher definition.
-The only download format is WMV.
-No zip file for photosets.
Bottom Line:
This is a major site in the netFameSolutions network. There are about 5 sites in the network that update consistently. The other sites have few to no updates. Many of the updates at the smaller sites are older clips from one of the 5 main sites.
The 5 main sites in this network: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD
The other sites in the network are niche sites.
Each of the 5 main sites is large, with a large number of DVD quality video clips. These are professionally shot videos, with good basic
technical features: good lighting, good focus, etc. There are a number of attractive models at each of the main sites.
The video quality is good, not great. Don't expect high-quality definition, because you will be seriously disappointed if you have that
expectation. Most of the video content is from 5-10 years ago or more. The videos have not been remastered to today's higher quality standards. But if you are familiar with the DVDs from 5-10 years ago, you will have a huge selection of video clips that cater to a wide range of sexual
preferences: mainly boy-girl, but also group sex (meaning 3 or more people in a sex scene); and there are niche sites that offer tranny, granny,
lesbian, MILF, Indian, etc. The quality of the newer videos is better than for the older videos. You do not get the HD quality of some sites, but the newer videos are nice quality.
The high quality clips are about
-400 MB for a 27 minute clip.
-total bitrate of about 2100 kbps.
-frame width x height: 720 x 400
Devils Film itself, like the other 4 main sites, has a wide variety of content. The content is mainly separated by category or series.
There are photosets, but they are useful for illustrating what the model looks like, and what the video action is. The site uses a software system where you can view each photo. But the system is really clunky and slow. You slowly load each photo as a thumbnail separately. You are supposed to be able to enlarge the thumbnail by clicking an icon, which might or might not work to enlarge the thumbnail. And to get to the next thumbnail, you click an icon, and wait for the thumbnail to load. A really stupid and slow system.
No zip file for the photosets, but most of the models in the photosets are not attractive anyway.
Search is basic and could be vastly improved. You can search by series, by name of model. The results for searching by name of model bring up clips at the Devils Film site plus other sites in the network the model is featured. But you have to know the name of the model for this to work. Not all models are listed for every clip. And there are other problems with the search. The model named Barbara at DevilsFilm is supposed to be in a clip at RoccoSiffredi, but the model named Barbara at RoccoSiffredi is a different model.
The price to join the network is $9.95/month, through PU/TBP. That gives you access to a huge amount of content of wide variety.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. You get access to all the sites in the network. No premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Secure login, secure member pages. HTTPS. So your ISP does not have a record of all the pages you visit, to hand to your friendly government to track your porn usage (Except they do have a record of your visit to the site, itself).
-6,500+ exclusive videos.
-2,500+ porn stars.
-Multiple weekly updates.
-The video quality is professional. Good lighting, good focus, good camera-work, nice sets.
-Fast response from customer service for email help. I was blocked from one of their sites, and customer service helped unblock me within 25 minutes.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
Cons:
-Too many ads on most pages.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-European members are charged higher prices.
-Navigation could be simpler. It's hard to know how many sites you have access to.
(The sites are listed below in the first reply to this review.)
-Navigation: trying to enter some of the specific sites can be a problem.
-Most sites are not updating. Some sites stopped updating 7 years ago.
-The videos have a long runtime. The TRU: A XXX Parody (a parody of True Blood TV series)
has a runtime of 2 hours 15 minutes 25 seconds. I don't mind expanding the Wham-Bam-Thank-You-Ma'am experience, but 2 hours plus is a lot of time spent watching models who are not actresses.
-The file sizes of the parodies are huge. The TRU: A XXX Parody download file runs from 1.6 GB to 11.6 GB, for 720p and 1080p file definitions.
-Site stopped updating in 2018.
Bottom Line:
The main sites of the New Sensations network include: The Tabu Tales
The Lesbian Experience
HotwifeXXX
Tales From The Edge
The Romance Series
Shane Diesel's Bangin'
Plus there are about 19 other sites covering different niches
Parody Pass features parodies of some of the main shows on TV or movies: X-Files, True Blood, Star Trek, Anchorman, The Flintstones, etc.
A parody of True Blood
TRU: A XXX Parody The simple life is shaken when death comes to the small, quiet Louisiana town of Bon Temps -- where civilians, vampires, shape-shifters, and mind readers clash in an orgy of sex & mystery. When a dead body is found with the heart ripped out, local waitress, Sookie (Ashlynn Brooke), who has a talent for reading minds, her best friend, Tara (Misty Stone), and her Vampire boyfriend, Bill (James Deen), try to unravel the supernatural web and find the murderer. Sookie and her friends find themselves pushing all their limits, both mentally and sexually, in a climax you'll have to see to believe! The mix of sex, horror, and action is so hot, it must be TRU: A XXX Parody
Starring: Ashlynn Brooke, Gracie Glam, Lana Violet, Lindy Lane, Missy Stone, Shay Sights, Vanessa Naughty
Released: 10/10/2018
Average Rating: 4.0
Categories: Anal, Asian, Big Tits, Blonde, Brunette, Cum On Tits, Facial, Full Movie, Group Sex, Latina, Natural Tits, Parody, Teens, Tiny Tits
I have a slow internet connection, so it's easier for me to download the videos and watch them with a player program (usually Windows Media Player or VLC Media Player) rather than wait and watch the video buffering a lot.
Except the downloaded file size is so large (1.6 GB for the smallest version of the file) that, because of my slow download speed and limited amount of hard drive space, make downloading and watching files from this site a problem.
That's just me.
I signed up with AT&T recently for an internet account, supposed to get 75 Mbps connection, but I often get less than 1 Mbps speeds for downloading.
So I need to go back to Time Warner, which I wasn't happy with because I was paying for 100 Mbps connection speed but getting far slower speeds.
Far slower speeds, but everything is relative: Slow at Time Warner is zoomy-zoom compared to AT&T service, in my case.
I'm giving the site a score of 82.
Some of the problems with the site are because of my slow internet connection (which I can fix by moving back to Time Warner). But the files sizes are huge at this site (1.6 GB for the smallest file of one parody, going up to 11.6 GB for a 1080 definition version of the same parody.
So you need a fast internet connection, and plenty of hard drive space if you want to collect these videos.
Plus, the ads can be annoying. On the other hand, some of the ads offer a membership price that is often lower than you will find at most places: Pure Taboo for $9.95 for the first month (renewing at $29.95/month thereafter).
But I get access to Pure Taboo through my Adult Time membership: Adult Time membership is one of the great bargains in porn, giving you access to over 140 channels (Adult Time calls sites "channels").
I like the idea of a porn parody. But the runtime on these files is just too long: 2 hours plus.
Normally, you watch porn to get hot. But 2 hours is too long, and the video needs to be split up into sections that are 1 hour or less. 30 minutes sounds like a good idea. 30 minutes of high grade sex would be the perfect solution.
So cut "TRU: A XXX Parody" into 4 or 5 sections, that can be viewed in order, to make a complete whole. You would need to adjust for pacing and plot, so it would be a lot of work, but the site would be improved.
Giving the site a score of 82, because of network access.
If you don't like the site, there are plenty of other sites in the network that you might find more to your liking.
See the first reply for a listing of all the sites you get access to.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large site. Over 1,500 scenes.
-Each scene comes with a photo set.
-PU discount for the first month
-Exclusive content. However, many tube sites might feature some of the Burning Angel content, as a form of cross-advertising.
-Actively updating. 1 new video per week.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale. Standard for porn sites.
-You don't get bonus sites with a membership.
-This is not precisely a con. Burning Angel is one of the over 140 channels (sites are called channels by the Adult Time network) included in an Adult Time membership.
So if you get Adult Time membership thrown in as an add-on by joining one of its members sites, this is a great deal. But Adult Time membership is random, even though Adult Time ended its beta testing in January 2019. So if you get Adult Time for free (through a membership in one of its satellite sites, that is a great deal. If you don't get Adult Time for free through a membership in one of its satellite sites, that's a lousy deal.
Bottom Line:
Site focuses on punk rock porn: what does that mean? Most models feature lots of tats, piercings, and are young models who love to get banged.
The girls or women don't care if they are banged by one guy, or more than one. The more the merrier, so the girls can fill their pussy, mouth, ass, hands, and if one or more girls want to join in, the more the merrier.
This is not a heartcore site. The girls get off of hard rock sex, not love or tenderness.
And if the sex turns kinky, go for it:
The Burning Angel site also encourages a community interest for fans.
There is a store where you can purchase items for the fan base, a blog where fans can discuss their likes and dislikes, and even live events where fans can meet some real live angels in person.
So one of the main selling points for the site is the sense of community it creates.
You can post ideas and opinions to like-minded fans about punk rock porn. Even get to meet and greet some of the performers from the Burning Angel site at live events.
As far as the videos and photo sets, they are professionally shot:
Are the videos and photo sets worth keeping?
If you are a fan of alt rock porn, the videos and photo sets are definitely worth keeping.
This is a niche that is far removed from heartcore porn.
Maybe it's an acquired taste, or if you're bored with traditional porn, you can check out this offering.
Some of the videos are definitely weird.
Not the normal erotic or hardcore porn.
There is a video of Chloe Cherry (also known as Chloe Courture) where she's wearing heavy black make-up (Chloe Cherry is a slim, cute blonde normally) who cuts up and destroys her dolls, then masturbates like she fucking nuts, than a man comes into the room. He's supposed to be her father, at least he's called Daddy Small Hands, and he fucks her pussy and ass in punishment for her bad behavior. Except Chloe loves to fuck, so it's not really punishment. Weird video, I'm still trying to understand it, and how it's supposed to be erotic. I don't mind dark videos, but what's supposed to turn me on here?
Fantasizing about brutally fucking a cute girl who's sick in the head?
Or maybe she's just bored, not sick in the head.
Whatever.
Second thoughts: Chloe is bored. And she is a goth chick. That's why the heavy black make-up and the clown-like costume. So she cuts up her dolls. Her "Daddy" comes in, sees the mess that her cut-up dolls make, and treats Chloe roughly. She loves being dominated.
The rough and harsh tone of his voice. He rips off her clothes, she licks and sucks his cock, then he fucks her pussy and ass, and she's in heaven: Daddy loves her, after all.
She's so happy now, that when Daddy finishes fucking her, she sticks one of the dolls up her ass.
End of story. Great action. Great plot. A twisted love story. (That was supposed to be ironic.)
A contrasting video: featuring Lola Fae as a goth chick (Lola Fae is a cute, slender white chick) with Steve Holmes playing her man servant. The video is titled: Goth Anal Whores 2 - Arya Fae.
Arya plays a goth chick who is not crazy, just bored. Holmes, who is in his 40s, is her personal man servant. He serves her wine, then caresses her all over with his fingers and tongue (in her ass and pussy and tits and mouth), then fucks her like crazy.
She is moaning and groaning and screaming with fake excitement.
This video is easier to understand than the Chloe Cherry video, but not much more exciting.
These videos have to fit into your fantasy to turn you on.
I appreciate more the videos at Teen Mega World and the Diesel network: those videos offer cute young teens, with less make-up, less tattoos, less fake moans and groans. The action, although fantasy, is more real.
Porn is personal. I once read that Michael Rennie, the actor in The Day the Earth Stood Still, put on a rubber wet suit to have sex with some heiress (this was many years ago).
I think she threw him out of the room. Not her thing. True story.
So porn is personal. Sex is personal. What rocks your boat can make the other person seasick (or just laugh).
The goth chick or heavy make-up or heavy tattoos or piercings or loud fake moans and fake groans and fake screams of excitement that Burning Angel features is not my thing.
But if you are into anal, goth chicks getting fucked, you can see if these videos have any interest for you.
My interest was that I got this as a free offering in the Adult Time network, that was given to me as a free offering with 21 Sextury.
I was told by 21 Sextury customer support that anyone joining any of the Adult Time member sites would get an Adult Time membership.
This was proved wrong:
I have a 1-year membership in Devils Film.
I also have a 1-year membership in New Sensations.
Membership in either one of those two sites should, according to 21 Sextury customer support, have given me a membership in Adult Time.
REVIEW CONTINES IN REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A large site. Currently 569 videos.
-Still updating. About 1 video per week.
-The videos are professionally hot: this is a premium site: Everything is first class: nice sets, good camera work, good lighting, clear, crisp images.
-streaming is offered in 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
-downloading is offered in 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
-All content is exclusive.
Let me note exclusive content: many tube sites can have some edited videos from Nuru Massage (and many other porn sites). The tube sites can offer good samples of the content of porn sites, giving you an idea of what those porn sites offer.
-The quality of the models is good: the models are mainly in their late teens or twenties. Many of them are attractive women. Mostly white.
-Each video has a good quality photo set. The photos seem excellent quality, probably from a camera instead of the more common screen-cap conversion software program found at many hardcore sites.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-There is a lower-cost streaming only membership offered through Adult Time.
As well as a higher-priced streaming plus downloading membership from Adult Time.
I don't see a streaming-only membership offered from Nuru Massage: the memberships seem to be streaming plus downloading.
-Even though I said there was good sound control (meaning there not a lot of loud, extraneous noises in the video, and even though the models are speaking in English, it's sometimes hard to understand the spoken words. Maybe it's an echo effect, or something.
But except for hearing the moans and groans and grunts of sex (which, if believable, help increase the heat of the video), the meaning of most dialogue is basically irrelevant to the action: it's the sex that counts, not what the models are saying (except in unusual situations, where the plot can add meaning, so it's nice to be able to follow the plot, if there is one).
Bottom Line:
This is a massage-themed porn sites.
There is a brief back story which sets up the action, which is a nuru massage (a sexual massage).
Nuru massage is an actual massage technique from Japan.
But Nuru Massage is a porn site that is part of the Fantasy Massage network from Gamma Entertainment.
The site and network was folded into Adult Time network last year.
A membership in Adult Time should give you access to the Fantasy Massage network.
However, it seems that Adult Time slices and dices the Gamma sites that are offered in different memberships: the basic membership offers streaming only. Unlimited.
The premium membership (at a higher price) offers streaming and downloading. Unlimited.
The Adult Time memberships are still given out on a random basis, if you join one of the satellite sites in the network.
You can join Adult Time directly but you will pay a higher price than if you join a member site during a discounted holiday special.
Adult Time network is the crown jewel, offering access to 142 channels (sites).
As far as content, you should have access to around 48,869 hardcore videos that were professionally shot: this means, mainly, good camera work, good lighting, good sets, good sound control, etc.
So the Adult Time network is a fantastic deal if you can get it at a reduced price.
A ton of good hardcore videos, covering a wide variety of niches, with thousands of porn stars, many of them well-known or famous.
If you don't get access to the Adult Time network with your membership to Nuru Massage or Fantasy Massage, then you are missing out on a huge amount of quality porn in the rest of the Adult Time network.
Sorry to keep repeating myself: But the important point is:
Adult Time network is the jewel: vast amount of hardcore porn, covering a wide variety of niches, with a large number of female porn stars.
Any membership in one of the Adult Time sites that does not include access to the entire Adult Time network means you are paying a high price for the limited amount of content you have access to.
The porn landscape has changed dramatically since the introduction of Adult Time.
A competing network, Lets Doe It (which recently changed its name from Porn Doe Premium), has over 40 sites, some of which are really outstanding (The White Boxxx does a great job presenting its models as gorgeous creatures), but Adult Time has far more content, and the quality of the porn at some of the sites is truly outstanding.
Of course, porn is a matter of personal taste: so what appeals to me might be boring to you, and vice versa.
But if you had to join only one porn site, my choice would be the Adult Time network.
Except to get a lower price, you should probably join through one of the member sites.
But first get a confirmation you will be getting access to the Adult Time network.
Getting back to the Nuru Massage site: Nuru Massage has 569 so it's a large site.
Most of the videos are Boy/Girl massage.
But there are also some Girl/Girl and Girl/Girl/Boy videos, for variety.
The Boy/Girl videos, although supposedly a Nuru massage, have less massage and more girl grabs boy's cock, licks and kisses it, partial blowjob, short fuck, and what else can they do?
I actually found many of the massage videos at Tricky Masseur (part of Teen Mega World), which are also found at the Diesel Network and at Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network) to be more erotic.
I prefer the Tricky Masseur videos to the Nuru massage videos, because the action seems more realistic, and hotter.
I'm giving the Nuru Massage a score of 82. If you add in access to the entire Adult Time network, streaming and downloading, at a discounted price, then the score jumps to 95.
I'm not impressed with Nuru Massage.
I am impressed with some of the sites and some content of Adult Time.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
