Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site has a nice selection of attractive models:
Mia Malkova, Kimmy Granger, Sara Luvv, Leah Gotti, Elsa Jean, Lena Anderson, Bree Daniels, Allie Haze.
-The site is part of the New Sensations network, so you get access to the entire network:
-6,500 exclusive videos.
-2,500 porn stars.
-Multiple weekly updates.
-25+ bonus sites.
Cons:
-I was locked out of the site today, after entering my login details (username and password). I don't know what the trouble was, because I copy and paste the details into the browser window.
I wrote a ticket to email support, and got an answer in about 25 minutes, which is fast response for email. They suggested deleting cache and cookies, restarting my PC, which I did, and I then entered my login details in the site window and was admitted to the site.
So, con for being blocked from site (after entering the correct login details).
Pro, for fast response from customer support, and for unblocking the site (the site was blocked for me because I tried entering the login details several times, and then got a popup message the site was blocked for me.
-cons: ads on most pages. Hard to tell what is an ad, and what is content at the site.
When you are in a site, and click on updates, it shows you network updates, site updates, and lots of ads.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
I don't want to click on an ad and find that I've subscribed to a different site.
I certainly don't remember all these ads the last time I joined the network.
-The site is small. Only 88 videos total.
-Site is an archive site. The site stopped updating in August 2018. Before then, they had a slow, inconsistent update rate.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF)
-The videos are about 2 girls having a lesbian experience. The lead-in is usually a story about how the relation develops, that gives a little extra meaning to the sex.
Because the site is small (88 videos total), and the site stopped updating last year, I'm dinging the score. But you also get access to the entire New Sensations network of 25+ sites covering a variety of niches.
The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good sets, good camera work. So there is plenty of content to look through, in spite of The Lesbian Experience being a small, archive site.
And you get to watch some of the most beautiful girls in porn. Truthfully, these girls are young, beautiful, and appear at many porn sites, but if the action is hot, they are worth watching. On the other hand, you have to be in the mood: some PU members have expressed disappointment with the network, while other PU members appreciate the contents
and think the network is a worthwhile join.
I think that many PU members have been exposed to so many beautiful models that we are getting a little jaded. Back in the 1990s or earlier, it would have cost a fortune to be able to watch so much excellent porn. Today, with porn tube sites, and low-cost pay sites, we can pick and choose from hundreds of quality porn sites, both softcore and hardcore.
And the quality of the models is outstanding.
So even though The Lesbian Experience is a nice site with quality content, and the New Sensations network has a large amount of high quality porn, I'm giving the site (with network access) a score of 82.
I'm always looking for the next big thing in porn.
But I recommend the Adult Time network, which has a huge amount of high quality porn covering a wide variety of niches. For what is apparently a very low price. But you have to know what you are getting before signing up to the Adult Time network, because they seem to slice and dice their offerings: streaming only, streaming with downloading, and what sites you get access to is variable. Adult Time might have passed their beta testing, but they need to standardize their offering packages. Unfortunately, I can't examine the Adult Time offering packages, since, as a member, when I go to their join page, I'm immediately re-directed to the member's area.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-24/7 customer support. Support is part of the MetArt network, which is among the finest csutomer support teams for any porn site. The only upgrade I would suggest would be to start a 24/7 live chat.
-Login and member pages are https. Secure.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Choice of definitions for downloads. Low, medium, high.
-Choice of definitions for online streaming of a photoset. Low, medium, high.
The online player is fast and easy to use.
Cons:
-Cons used to be basically minor. This is part of the MetArt network, so you knew you were getting a quality product. But lately the site seems to be stumbling.
-Membership only gives you access to the Stunning18 site. No bonus sites are included.
-The update rate has really dropped off in the last year. From a lot of updates per month in previous years, the rate has dropped to maybe 4 updates a month recently.
-The chronological listing of photo set updates is jumbled. Instead of a continuous listing of updates for each month of a year, there are gaps where there is no listing for photo sets from different past year's months.
-I don't know if it's lack of funds or lack of technical staff, but the site needs to be better organized, to make searching the contents easier, to find what's available.
Bottom Line:
I believe Stunning18 was started and run by Antonio Clemens. He was the main photographer for the site. I don't know if he is suffering ill health or what the problem is, but the update rate for the Stunning18 site has dropped way down. And the site has some technical problems where the chronological listing of the updates, by year and month, is showing a lot of gaps. It looks like Thierry Murrell, another erotic photographer with experience in glam photography, has stepped in to supply much of the recent updates at Stunning18.
Thierry Murrell was the main photographer at Glam Deluxe, which was a small glam site that featured at lot of attractive teen models. But the Glam Deluxe site closed a few years ago. Thierry Murrell has previously contributed to the MetArt site.
My recommendation: which is based on a lack of knowledge of what the problems are at the Stunning18 site:
Thierry Murrell was the main photographer at Glam Deluxe. I assume he controls or owns or has some interest in the content at the closed Glam Deluxe site.
I suggest that MetArt staff make an offer to buy or lease the content from the Glam Deluxe site, and use that content to fill the gaps in the update rate for Stunning18.
There might be egos involved, legal considerations. But MetArt took over the Domai and Goddess Nudes sites, and runs other sites under the MetArt banner. I was a member of Glam Deluxe years ago: the models were very attractive, the photography seemed first rate.
This would be a way for the owners of the Glam Deluxe content to monetize the content, and for Stunning18 to fill the gaps in the update rate, and give the site time to settle whatever other problems the site might be having.
MetArt can publish a short blog explaining that they've taken control of the former Glam Deluxe site contents, with the approval of Thierry Murrell, to help fill the gaps in the current update rate. That should help explain to the Stunning18 members why MetArt is using previously published or unpublished content from another site.
Just a suggestion. But worth looking into.
Personally, I think it's a shame when a good site closes, and the contents, if worthwhile, are lost to people who would be interested in viewing or collecting those contents.
My recommendation is to wait for the update rate to pick up again, before joining the Stunning18 site. There is plenty of older photosets to browse, but if you want newer updates, wait for the update rate to return to normal.
I'm giving the Stunning18 site a score of 82, until they fix the update rate and the chronological listing of their contents.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Secure page for choosing login details.
-Secure member pages (https).
-Sometimes a great discount for membership price.
-Over 6,500 exclusive videos.
-Access to 15+ sites.
-Premium HD quality at its network.
-No captcha required for login.
-Excelllent search. Searches the entire network for a model's content, not just the site you are currently logged into.
-Multiple choices for both streaming and downloading.
-Don't have to pay extra for downloading.
-Videos have a trailer, to give you a preview.
-Nice model page, with good-sized thumbnail of the model, plus hot links to her network content.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for porn sites.
-Icons to control the video sometimes disappear (Play, pause, volume control can be hard to find).
-Need a fast internet connection to stream videos, or they can stutter or stop. My connection is fine for most other paysites, but not at this network.
-The videos have a codec that my software (including VLC media player) won't play. This is the first network I've found this problem.
-I've had problems with downloading videos.
-Ads for other paysites on the member pages.
-Once a video starts to stream, you can't do a partial rewind or fast forward: you have to re-start the video from the start. If you pause the video, you have to reload the page and restart the video from the beginning.
-The photo sets are poor-quality screencaps. Most competing paysites have better screencaps.
-The audio portion of a video sometimes cuts out during online streaming.
Bottom Line:
The videos are plot-based: You have a setup for the sex, to give meaning to the sex.
Navigation is good. The model pages have nice-sized thumbnails of the model, with hot links to her content at the network.
Most videos come with a trailer to give you a fast pre-view of the video.
Mot videos come with a photoset, but the photos are poor quality screencaps, and even if the model is attractive, the photo sets are not worth collecting.
Even though the photos in a set are poor quality screencaps, the file size of each photo can be 6 to 8 MB, which is huge. They are using a poor codec for the photos.
Sites like MetArt have high-quality photos. MetArt low definition file size for a photo is 100 KB or less. MetArt high definition file size for a photo is 200 KB or less.
But New Sensations photos, which are poor-quality screencaps, are 30 to 60 times the size of MetArt high quality photos.
I need a software program that will play the downloaded videos, because I have problems streaming the videos.
I was a previous member back in December 2016, and did not have any of my current problems with streaming or downloading the videos, or playing them once downloaded.
One of the main advantages of New Sensations is they give you a storyline that leads up to the sex, to make the sex more meaningful. And some of the videos can be hot.
For example:
From the Tabu Tales site: Raylin Ann: Deep Secret Desires Become Reality For Raylin: Posted 11/18/2016.
Raylin has been keeping her longtime crush and deep sexual desires hidden from her step brother Karlo. One massage that finally went too far opened loose her sexual awakening and her shorts. Not even a phone call from their mother could distract her from sucking on his cock, she was quickly spread wide and fucking her way from fantasy to reality and swallowing it all up.
Starring: Karlo Karrera, Raylin Ann
So you get the incest of step siblings, with the additional naughtiness of girl talking to her mother while she is seduced and fucked by her step brother.
Bottom line:
If you're lucky enough to get one of their special discounted memberships, you get a huge amount of hardcore porn covering many different niches. The video quality is good. And the price can be low.
Making this a very worthwhile join.
But technical issues (playback problems, poor quality photo sets, a clunky online player for the photosets) detract from the value of the network.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Secure login page. (https)
-Secure member pages. (https)
This keep some information safer from hacking, and leaves less of a record for your ISP.
-Superior support: live chat is 24/7, fast to respond, with knowledgeable, helpful staff.
-You can also access support by toll-free telephone, or email.
-Membership in any one of the Fame Digital network sites gives you access to over 20 sites.
-There is a trailer for most videos, to give you a quick look at the action of the video.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading are included in the basic membership price.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. But this is almost standard for any porn site.
-Sometimes will experience a poor connection. Yesterday, I could not stream videos (they stuttered and stopped), and downloading files was very slow. I checked my internet connection at a test site, was was getting about 102 to 110 Mbps, which should give smooth streaming and fast downloads, but my connection to the Devils Film network server was poor.
-They did a network update a few years ago, making the site and network harder to use: They dropped the easy-to-see-and-use dropdown menu for changing sites. And they changed the structure of the entire network, so that you are now forced to use a gateway site instead of actually entering the different sites you have access to--which makes exploring and accessing the contents of each site harder.
-Slow update rate. For the last year, 1 new video per month.
-The photosets are poor screencaps of the accompanying video.
CONS CONTINUE:
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-The software mechanism for viewing the photosets online is clumsy and poorly designed.
-The sound control of the videos can be poor: Sound can spike suddenly, making normal sounds into explosions.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
Site theme: For many years now, the bald pussy look has been the norm. HairyUndies is a niche site that features women with pubic hair.
The site is part of the Devils Film network.
-The most famous sites in this network include: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD
Access to any one of the sites listed above would justify the membership price: Access to all 5 major sites, plus over 15 more sites, means you have access to a huge amount of hardcore porn for a very low price.
PU lists this site (HairyUndies.com) as a clone of the Devils Film site.
This is probably because all the videos and photosets (the photosets are screencaps of the video) carry the Devils Film watermark.
Also, the videos are listed as "from Devilsfilm" on the gateway site.
My interpretation: The Devils Film network uses a gateway system where you are logged in to a gateway site, and access the different sites from the gateway site, instead of actually entering each separate site completely.
This means it's easier for the network to maintain the network, since they don't have to work on each separate site, but only on the network gateway.
It makes it harder for the user to explore and access the content of each site.
And also it's more confusing about which videos belong to which site, since there's some question whether any particular video is part of one site, or just randomly thrown in from a different site.
And the watermark on the video is no help, since the sites labelled under the Devils Film section all carry the Devils Film logo. (Hairy Undies is labelled under the Devils Film section.)
Maybe a software engineer could explain it more simply: but I do not believe Hairy Undies is a clone, but a listing of a site that no longer exists as a separate site, but is a listing of videos and the accompanying photosets that formerly made up the Hairy Undies site.
Anyway, I'm giving the site and network a score of 82.
This is because you get access to a huge amount of hardcore porn for a very low price.
There are some real gems at the network, but you have to slog through a lot of junk to find them.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Porn Pros Network. Joining this site gives you access to the basic Porn Pros Network sites.
-The network collection of the models is very good. Mainly young white attractive teens.
-I like the simple home page with hot links to the major categories:
Home Scenes Girls Sites Categories Favorites Live Cams Deals Blog
-Easy login, if you have cookies enabled. You still have to check the captcha box, and go through the mandatory page asking if you want to upgrade to premium status (for $70), but cookies allow you to forget the random username and password assigned to you.
-Unlimited downloading.
-All content at Cruelty Party is advertised as exclusive.
One member posted that a scene at Cruelty Party was also posted at Passion HD. I would assume that the majority of the scenes at the network are exclusive. Passion HD and Porn Pros Network share the same parent company, AMA Multimedia LLC.
Membership in Passion HD does not give access to the Porn Pros Network, and vice versa.
Cons:
-Have to enter captcha to log in to site.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page. Warning: even if you uncheck the pre-checked cross sale, you might still be charged for the pre-checked cross sale site. So check your credit card and email to see if you were signed up for a trial subscription, and be prepared to dispute the charge. If you used Epoch as the billing agent, you should be able to reverse the charge.
-Segpay is the default biller. If you can, switch to Epoch. I have little experience with Segpay. But I always found Epoch to be reliable, easy to deal with, and helpful if I had any billing problems.
-Each time you enter the site, you first have to pass through an offer to upgrade your subscription for $70 to the premium sites in the Porn Pros Network.
-Advertising for other sites on every page.
-There seems to be some elimination of basic sites over time.
A few months ago, there were 22 sites available in the basic Porn Pros network (not counting the premium sites).
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
Currently (2017-02-09), there are 16 sites shown in the sites listing.
They still advertise that you get access to 24 sites when joining. However, I've found that many porn sites advertise facts that are not true.
-They advertise daily network updates. However, when you check the network update page, you see 1 new scene per week for the last 2 months. Which is not the same as 1 new scene per day.
-User name and password are pre-selected on join. So have to copy them down to enter the site. Can't choose your own user name and password (for easier memory).
-The last update for Cruelty Party was on March 28, 2013. So this is an archive site, with no updates for almost 4 years.
-Some links lead to an Error 503 Service Unavailable.
--Sometimes videos stop streaming with the message: Network error.
-Sometimes photos fail to load: Message states: Forbidden.
We're sorry, the server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
-You have limited choices of definitions to download a video. Many videos only offer a 1080p or 480p choice.
However, when you choose the 1080p definition choice to download, and then check the videos specs of the downloaded file, it turns out that the video is really a 720p or 700p definition video.
On a small monitor, this is not a problem: My 14" laptop plays the 720p videos with sharp images and good colors and good sound. But if you play the video on a large monitor, you might be disappointed with the image quality or other factors.
-Videos download with the default name of the scene only. Does not include the name of the site, the model, or the date posted. So need to rename each video manually.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Medium sized site: 236 updates.
-Access to this site gives you access to the basic Porn Pros network, which has about 22 sites.
-The site has
-PU discounted price $17.95/month.
-No download limits.
-Site contents is advertised as 100% exclusive.
-Each scene has a matching photoset.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-The models are almost all attractive, young teens or early twenties girls.
-Most videos have a choice for download of 480p, 720p, 1080p.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Captcha on log-in page.
-Nag screen to upgrade to premium status for $70 when entering site.
-Adds for other paysites on member pages, as well as the ad to upgrade to premium status.
-Sometimes hot links lead to error pages: File not found, video file not found, html5 network error.
-Slow download speeds. I was getting less than 200 KB/sec, while at other sites I was getting over 4 MB/sec.
So to download a 1080p file (1.01 GB) can take over 2 hours. Which is ridiculous.
Bottom Line:
The site theme is two girls who are best friends. Since this is a porn site, that means a lot of lesbian sex.
And quite often, the scenes feature a guy who gets to pleasure both of the girls.
Site stats:
-236 videos.
-236 matching photosets.
I believe the photos are screencaps made from the matching video. The software used to make the screencaps is excellent: photos are nicely centered, nicely focused, well lighted.
The scenes are basically straight hardcore sex. The scene usually starts off with the two girls kissing, possibly fondling one another. And then a guy starts kissing the two girls, and they all have sex. So there's not much of a plot or buildup to the sex.
The scenes are professional shot: good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control. The sets are simple: usually a nice, clean bedroom. Costume are minimal: either the models start off naked, or they are wearing street clothes which are soon discarded.
One problem with the site is that the sex gets repetitious. There's no plot, it's just 2 girls having sex, or 2 girls and a guy having sex. A plot or backstory would give some meaning to the sex, make it more interesting.
So even though the girls are physically attractive, and young, many of the scenes lack heat.
The main value of the site is that you gain access to the basic Porn Pros network, which has over 3,000 videos.
Most of the girls are young and attractive. And there are many hot videos to be found.
My favorite site at the network is MassageCreep, which is one of the better massage-themed hardcore sites.
Other massaged-themed sites (not affiliated with Porn Pros) include Tricky Masseur (part of Teen Mega World), RubATeen (part of Team Skeet, which has many of the same videos as Tricky Masseur), and FuckedHard18 (part of Porn Master Mind).
Giving the site a score of 82, for the network access. If the site were scored as a stand-alone site, the score would be much lower.
One of the main negatives is the slow download speeds. I have been getting less than 200 KB/sec.
That is downloading a single video file, which can take over 2 hours to download.
Another negative is that many of the videos lack heat.
However, if you enjoy watching 2 girls and a guy have sex, you would probably rate the site higher than I do.
I normally enjoy watching one guy and one girl having sex, versus one guy and two girls. The fantasy just seems more real to me. And it's easier to film one on one, instead of one guy on two girls.
In my opinion, anyway.
However, if done right, one guy on 2 girls can be hot as hell, if you watch some of Rocco Siffredi's scenes (from RoccoSiffredi.com, part of the Devil's Film network).
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Primary billing agent is Epoch. A major plus, because Epoch means you can easily cancel your membership, and offers help if you have a billing problem with the site.
-Nice assortment of teen, hardcore sites. You get access to 22 sites (listed in the "Bottom Line" section of this review).
-Many of the models are late teens, early twenties. Mainly white, mostly attractive.
-Professionally shot videos: OK or good camera work, lighting, sound control, etc. But poor editing.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free, easy to use download manager.
-Good download speeds. I get around 3-5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6.25 MB/sec.
-Can stream videos in high definition or standard definition.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
Warning: I unchecked the pre-checked cross-sale on the join page when I subscribed, but found that I was charged for the cross sale anyway. I had to contact the biller to reverse the charge. The biller was Epoch, who allowed me to cancel the "fraudulent" sale, since I told them I had unchecked the cross-sale.
-$69.95 one-time charge to upgrade your membership to access all the sites in the network (as long as you keep your original membership open).
-You have to click through/decline the $69.95 upgrade page to enter your paid membership sites each time you log in to the site. Which is irritating.
-Only one definition (1080p) is offered for downloading many videos. Which is surprising. I've seen very few sites that offer such a limited choice to download a video.
-Even though the downloaded video is listed as 1080p, when you download the video, and check its specs, you find: frame width: 852 frame height: 480.
Based on those specs, I would assume
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
the video is not 1080p, but 480p.
Since I am viewing the video on a 14" laptop (that's a few years old), the videos are nice and crisp images.
But if you were watching the videos on a large-screen monitor, you might be disappointed with the quality since these are 480p videos.
-There's not a lot of buildup or plot to the videos: they are basically hardcore sex. There might be some kissing before the bj and fucking, but it's minimal. Most videos are just basically hardcore sex. A little plot would add to the videos. Even though a lot of the videos feature attractive models, the sex can get repetitious. If I were new to porn, just looking at these naked, attractive models having sex would be a real turn-on. But I'm not new.
Sites like Blacked and Tushy offer high quality models and a glamcore style of shooting that makes the videos much more appealing than the straight hardcore videos at Porn Pros.
-The editing is very abrupt: there are missing jumps in the action where the girl is naked by herself, then a guy is eating her pussy, then he is fucking her, and the action is jerky because they delete the intervening motions. The action is not continuous, but disconnected, which is poor editing.
The porn pros network is basically a collection of teen sites.
The network is mainly hardcore videos.
You also get a matching photoset for most videos. The matching photosets are quality screencaps of the video shoot. The software program used to make the screencaps from the video does an excellent job--far better than the screencaps that used to accompany hardcore videos from years ago.
Since many of the models are really attractive, many of the photosets are worth collecting.
This is not categorized as a photo network, but the quality of the screencaps is impressive.
This is a large network: you get access to over 3,000 videos.
For $17.95/month with a PU discount, you get your money's worth.
Many of the models are attractive young women. Engaged in hardcore sex.
If the videos had some plot to give the sex more meaning, it would increase the value of the network.
Even though sites like Blacked and Tushy and X Art have less content, I enjoy the videos at those sites more, because those sites make an effort to:
-select the most outstanding attractive models
-present the models in the most visually attractive way (with excellent camera-work, outstanding lighting, make-up, etc.)
-base the sex on some plot to make the video more erotic than just hardcore sex.
I'm giving the network a score of 83. That is very subjective.
If you are new to porn, the videos would have more of an impact on you, and you would rate the network higher.
But in the last few years, I've joined a number of paysites, and have seen so many attractive young models, that I want videos that have more plot or variety than straight hardcore sex. An element of eroticism.
Sites like Blacked, Tushy or X-Art are high quality glamcore sites.
But you can find gonzo sites that can have an element of eroticism, or strong visual appeal.
If you watch the videos at Rocco Siffredi, which is mainly gonzo hardcore sex, some of those videos have a potent effect because the sex seems real. Those videos do not have the ultra-refined camera-work and lighting and colors compared to Blacked, Tushy or X-Art, but some of the Rocco Siffredi videos can be very hot in spite of the lower quality, because the action/plot is so strong.
I also give Teen Mega World a higher rating, another teen hardcore network, because many of their videos appeal to me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login. No captcha required.
-Can stream and/or download the scenes.
-Multiple definitions for streaming and download: low (for mobile), medium, high, super high (1080p).
-Long time before site timeout due to inactivity.
-Professionally shot videos: good camera-work, good focus, good lighting, good colors, good sound control.
-Models are young Japanese, late teens to early twenties, attractive.
Cons:
-Sex toys are used extensively in the scenes. Both dildos and vibrators (some people say that a dildo can be a vibrator, but that's another topic).
-Squirting is messy (and smelly, I would assume). Clinical studies have shown that the liquid spraying from a girl's pussy is pee.
-This site gives you multiple long shots of the girl's pussy; but after a long time, it gets boring.
-The search needs to be improved. It has a clunky interface, and it gives poor search results when you enter a model's name.
For multiple reasons:
The Squirting Virgin site has easier navigation. You can find the videos of any model much easier.
The Squirting Virgin site videos have more heat and imagination to the sex.
The Squirting Virgin videos have a large element of sadomasochism. As I wrote in my recent Squirting Virgin review, the stunt cock is the master, and the attractive model is his sex toy to be used and abused and pleasured. The guy fucks the model like a pro. Hard and fast and long. So the fantasy element is well-played.
In the Shiofuky site, you don't get the feeling that the guy/guys are masters who are fucking the models harshly. In fact, many of the scenes show little or no fucking. The girls are being pleasured by the dildos and vibrators and fingers, and then they squirt.
I think the harsh fucking which the Squirting Virgin site emphasizes, adds a lot of heat to the scenes, and the Shiofuky scenes are mild by comparison.
The Shiofuky site is more for voyeurs who enjoy watching girls reaching orgasm.
The Squirting Virgin site adds an element of harshness, along the lines of a Pierre Woodman video, where the guy is going to fuck the brains out of the model. The girl's enjoyment is secondary, she gets pleasure because she is being used as nature intended her to be used.
I'm describing the fantasy that the male watcher is supposed to be experiencing. Although some PU members might disagree with my theory or words.
In other words, the Squirting Vigin site emphasizes heat over mildness.
Maybe I'm becoming blase to porn. Because at one time, seeing a girl squirting, by itself, would have seemed a shocking event to me. But now, it's just another porn niche.
The Pierre Woodman videos (Woodman Casting X and Wake Up N Fuck) feature hardcore pussy and ass pounding, intense fingering, forcible cock sucking, a lot of slapping by the stunt cock of the woman's face and breasts and ass cheeks.
The Woodman videos are not squirting videos.
The Squirting Vigin site is similar to the Pierre Woodman videos, with the addition of female squirting.
The Shiofuky site is just squirting videos, with little hardcore pussy or ass pounding. So it's much milder than the Squirting Virgin site, or the Pierre Woodman videos.
The Pierre Woodman sites are expensive compared to Squirting Virgin or Shiofuky. But they are worth the extra money if you enjoy harsh treatment of women with sex.
The Squirting Virgin site features the harsh treatment of women with sex, for a lower price: but that site is small, and it stopped updating years ago. However, the Squirting Virgin site also offers access to the Teen Mega World network, which has a massive amount of hardcore teen videos in different niches.
The Shiofuky site has 336 scenes, but I found them kind of boring. If they were more exciting I would give Shiofuky a higher score. But they also need to improve the search engine, and make a few other improvements to make the site easier to navigate.
Giving Shiofuky a score of 82. That is very subjective. If you find the scenes interesting, the site would score higher.
If you find the videos boring, you could score lower than I did.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Content is dated.
-Currently updating. One new scene/video per week.
-The home page and inside pages are clean, with nice thumbnails illustrating the scenes/videos on offer.
-No ads to clutter up the member pages.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Special PU discount for the first month of $9.95.
-The models are listed for each scene.
-The categories are listed for each scene. For example, one scene shows the following categories: Lesbian, Hardcore, Natural tits, Big Breast, Public nudity & voyeur. So you know who the models are, and what the action in the scene is about.
-Can watch the videos streaming, or download.
-There is a listing of the models. The listing has a nice thumbnail to show you what the model looks like.
-Click on the thumbnail of the model in the listing, you get a bigger-sized picture of the same thumbnail, plus the sites in the netFameSolutionsnetwork the model appears.
Cons:
-The next step in integrating the model listing would be to not just list the sites a model appears in, but to have a hot link for each video the model is in, at all the network sites. Teen Mega World does this, and it makes search/navigation so much easier. But with netFameSolutions network (this network), you first have to login to your signup site, then switch to the site you want to examine (because you found a listing appearance of your model), and then go to the model listing at that site, click on her name, and that will bring up links to her videos at that site.
-Sometimes a streaming video will pause or stop. Not sure why. Streaming is only 240p or 540p, my download speed is about 1.3 MB/sec, so I should
be able to stream with no problem.
But I prefer downloading over streaming, and the download options have higher definitions than the streaming.
-Uncheck the pre-checked cross-sell at signup, or you will be charged for a trial subscription to a different site.
Bottom Line:
CONS (Continued):
-Did not see a zip option for the photosets.
-If you save the photos, apparently there is only one definition offered.
No choice of low, medium or high.
You can view the photosets online. You can see each photo as a thumbnail or enlarged to a full-sized image. Then you can switch to the next photo in the series by using an arrow link.
-You can use DownThemAll (a download manager) or some other program to download the photosets. But zip files would be more convenient.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site statistics:
Movies: 297
Average length of movies: 5 - 14 - minutes
DVDs: 54
Pornstars: 263
Hours: 92
Total Size: 81 Gb
Picture sets: 283
Pictures per set: 9 - 460
Zip sets: No
High Res: No
Streaming has 2 or 3 choices:
240p
480p
540p (their version of high definition)
Download in WMV or MP4 files:
WMV
240p (low)
480p (high)
A very nice addition to the netFameSolutions network. This site emphasizes artsy, sophisticated hardcore. Not gonzo. The lighting can be dark, to add atmosphere. They aim for erotic, seductive scenes.
The scenes/videos/movies are taken from DVDs the studio, Daring Media, puts out. There is a wide variety of sex on display: blowjobs, pussy licking, fucking by couples, group sex, masturbation, lesbian, voyeur, bondage, There is variety in the settings as well: nightclub, beach, in ancient Rome. There are many attractive models in the vids, in their twenties or early thirties.
I especially enjoyed the Roma series, set in the days of ancient Rome. It teaches you the proper way to live your life. The series starts out with a noble Roman commander, who says his daughter just died giving birth, and now he needs some distraction. So he and a male companion turn to a lovely brunette, who just happens to be lying on a couch in the same tent, and the two men fuck the brunette's brains out. At the same time, a third Roman, also in the tent, starts fucking a second woman lying on a different couch. You would think the commander, being in charge, would have a woman all to himself. But I guess that Romans/Italians think a second guy is helpful in getting the woman aroused, and in finishing her off.
The acting on the videos is not always entirely realistic, but it can be interesting to watch, at times. And it gives you an idea of how large the
Roman tents were, to hold all those women on their couches, when the Romans needed some distraction from the fighting and whatnot.
You get this site with access to the netFameSolutions network. And it makes a nice change of pace from their gonzo offerings. From earlier comments and reviews, this site will appeal to some people, while others will think it's a waste of time.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Very low membership fee. $7.99/month, or $27.99/year.
-A nice selection of attractive models. Mixture of amateur and professional porn models.
-CCBILL is the payment processor, a trusted name.
-Update rate averages 3-4 new photo sets per week.
-Zishy is based in L.A., California. The girls are a mixture of models and college girls.
-Easy login. After you login to the site, the following logins don't require a username and password, (with cookies enabled).
Cons:
-This is primarily a non-nude site. Do not join if you want to see full-blown nudity, or hard-core sex.
-Although there are many attractive girls, this is not a glamour site: the models are shot with little make-up, with regular-style clothes. The models appear like the girl-next-door.
You honestly would not recognize many of these girls you might have seen at other porn sites, unless you study them and compare them with photos from other sites. The average teenager at a shopping mall or on the street wears more make-up than most of the models photographed at Zishy.
-This is mainly a photo site. There are videos, but the videos are short, most under 3 minutes, some videos under a minute.
Bottom Line:
Zishy is basically a non-nude site.
Occasionally you will see a naked ass, uncovered nipples, even less will you see a naked pussy.
The site theme is less is more: the female form is better served covered, which lets the imagination free to roam.
The aim is to entertain through innocent and playful means.
What is suprising is that you can't tell the professional models from the amateurs unless you have a keen eye and a lot of history with porn models. Basically, the professional porn models are presented as amateurs, with very little of their normal make-up, in regular clothes, in non-porn poses and settings.
The truth is, you will find the average teenager in a shopping mall wears far more make-up, and is better dressed, than the models at Zishy.
In the last year or more, you are seeing a few naked breasts, a few naked asses, but the majority of the photos are still non-nude. This is not a site you should join to see nudity.
It can be interesting to compare the photo sets of the porn models at Zishy with their sets at porn sites.
It illustrates how much the photographer can influence how attractive a model will appear in a photo.
I've said it before, but it bears repeating: a model can appear average-looking, or very attractive, or extremely lovely, depending on how she is photographed. Some sites specialize in making their models as glamorous as possible. Zishy photographs their models to appear "natural", not glamorized or heavily made-up.
When I started checking how many of the models at Zishy were porn models, I was surprised at the number that were featured in soft-core and hard-core sites. Because you would not have any hint from the Zishy photo sets that many of
these girls are willing to show everything they have at more explicit porn sites.
A very few of the models at Zishy who are featured in more well-known porn sites are:
Alaina Fox
Alex Mae
Alice Wonder
Amber Sym
Bailey Rayne
Bree Daniels
Keisha Grey
Dillion Harper
Kenze Thomas
Lily Ivy
Samantha Rone
Jayden Taylors
Maybe my brain is very slow, but I found it fascinating how different a model can appear at the Zishy site versus her appearance at a regular porn site. For some models, you really have to examine the girl, to see it's the same person.
But then again, there are so many porn models out there, that some models resemble each other fairly closely.
Bottom line:
Since the price is so low ($7.99/month, or $27.99/year), it's worth joining to see what the site has to offer. As long as you are not expecting a nude site, Zishy is mainly very softcore tease.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Erotic Beauty is part of the MetArt network. So you can expect the following:
-Excellent customer service. Fast and responsive and helpful for most questions and problems. However, this is an email service, so expect a delay of several hours or days before you get a respone. A live chat line would be much faster.
-A catalog of attractive to beautiful women. Ranging in age from late teens to about 30 years old. Mainly white. Mainly from Eastern Europe.
-High quality glamour photography. The models are not dressed up in fancy costumes, or made to look glamourous, but these are attractive women and the photos are designed to showcase their beauty.
-Site structure is designed for simple navigation: Photos can be viewed in 3 different
definitions: can also be downloaded in 3 different definitions in zip files.
-No streaming or download limits. (The streaming refers to viewing photo slide shows. The site has no videos. This is a photo only site.)
-PU discount of $19.99/month recurring.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Login and member pages are https.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are basically minor. This is part of the MetArt network, which offer sites with high standards: simple navigation, high quality photography, excellent (responsive) customer service.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-They used to update with 1 new photoset daily. But starting in 2019, they update with 2 new photosets per week. See bottom line section why this is probably the main knock against the site. They are charging full price, but giving poor service on the updates.
-Site has no videos. But truthfully, most softcore videos are boring anyway.
Bottom Line:
Erotic beauty is softcore nudity. It's a photo only site (no videos).
The bottom line: There are many fine softcore nude sites. Erotic Beauty is a good site, but the competition is fierce. MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, to name some of my favorite softcore sites, offer more bang for your porn dollars than Erotic Beauty.
MetArt is the outstanding value, with its massive catalog:
-Photosets------19,839
-Videos---------1,600 (Almost all softcore videos are boring, and a waste of time and effort. MetArt has a genius for photographing beautiful naked women and making you wonder why they bothered. Except that recently MetArt is improving, and trying to make the videos slightly more erotic, and allowing the models to touch themselves, so there is starting to be a sexual element in the videos.
-Models---------3,622
-Updates--------4 updates per day, except the first of each month, 6 updates.
Compare that to Erotic Beauty:
-Photosets----------5,066
-Videos-------------0 (none)
-Models-------------2,130
-Updates------------2 per week
MetArt blows the competition away in terms of quantity of photosets, models, updates.
And the quality of the photosets and attractiveness of the models is outstanding.
So if you are into softcore nudity, my advice is:
First, join MetArt.
Then join either MPL Studios or Femjoy. Both are outstanding sites, with gorgeous girls, high grade photography.
As I wrote, there are many good to excellent softcore erotic sites out there:
But in my opinion, MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios are best in class.
Erotic Beauty is good, but it's a second-class offering compared to the leaders in softcore nudes.
I'm giving the site a score of 80: the exact score is very subjective, but in simple comparisons, I think you get far more value for your porn dollars with MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios.
Note: If you didn't have sites like MetArt, Femjoy, and MPL Studios, Erotic Beauty would be a wonderful site. But since we live in the real world, where the average person wants the best return on his money, Erotic Beauty falls by the wayside. Yes, it has lots of attractive to beautiful models, and yes, there many outstanding photosets of these lovelies, but the competition has even more attractive models, more photosets, and a faster update rate.
On the other hand, I do recommend joining the site for a month, at $19.99 (or a lower price if you can find one during a holiday special), and downloading like mad all of your favorite models. Because the site has lots of lovely models featured in sets that are worth keeping.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Like many porn sites, they now use https for login details.
-Like many porn sites, they now use https for member pages.
-Membership in any one of the member sites of the network gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites that require extra fees.
-Search is good. You put in a model's name, it searches the entire network, not just her content at the site you are logged in to.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Unlimited streaming.
-All content is exclusive. For the site and the network.
-Multiple choices of definition and bitrate for streaming and downloading videos.
-This is a large site. 720 videos.
-Each video has a photo set, with a zip file for easy downloading.
Cons:
-No PU discount. But wait for a holiday, and you might find a discounted price
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. This is standard for most porn sites.
-You need a fast internet connection to stream the videos. My connection is too slow, so the videos stutter and stop. I have to download the videos and use a software player to watch. That is my problem, not the fault of the site.
-Archive site. Last update was in July 2015.
-The photo sets are screen shots made from the videos. So even when the model is attractive, each photo is poor quality, and not worth saving. Which is a shame, because some of these models are very attractive.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: women getting fucked and then finishing with cum sprayed on their face.
Shows how powerful the man is, and how the woman is submissive to his desires.
Side note01: Not all the scenes end with the guy shooting cum over the model's face.
Maybe if they used fake cum, and it looked real, they could have the guy shooting a massive load of cum on the girl's face, proving that he is a manly man.
Side note02: A lot of the sites have a strong backstory to set up the sex, to add some meaning beyond two or more bodies slapping against each other. But the Jizz Bomb site is more gonzo sex, with very little story before it gets into the sex.
Side note03: Although the videos are good, with crisp, clear images, the photo sets are made of screencaps of poor quality. Many hardcore sites outside of the New Sensations network have improved the quality of the photo sets made from videos, but the Jizz Bomb photo sets are poor quality screencaps.
The New Sensations network advertises:
6,500 exclusive videos.
2,500 porn stars.
Multiple weekly updates.
15+ bonus sites.
The PU price shown is $29.95/month recurring. But you can find specials.
I joined on a special discount (they come around on a lot of holidays).
For a lowered price, the network is worth joining, at least once.
But PU members reaction to the site varies a lot:
rearadmiral gave the network a score of 75.
marcdc1 and insomniacxxx gave the network a score in the 90s.
So individual opinions vary a lot.
Which is normal.
jook thinks the network is boring and a waste of his money.
Why did I join?
-I found a special discounted low price. I was a previous member, and found enough content that I enjoyed--although there is even more content that I passed on.
TheBestPorn.com site provides a valuable service that gives an over-view of many different porn sites. It also lists the PU/TBP discount, pros, cons, bottom line, and other useful facts.
Some of the facts may be out of date.
However, I don't pay a lot of attention to the exact score a site receives.
My own approach to setting a score for a site depends on my personal preferences, and there can be a wide latitude in the final score a site receives.
The main factor for increasing the score a site receives if it's part of a network, and gives access to the network contents.
To me, that is an essential factor in the score of a site: how much content does a site membership give you access to?
A second essential factor is the quality of the content, which is a more nebulous concept, since it depends on a person's perception of the content.
Then there is ease of use of the site/network contents: is the site/network easy to navigate, are there download limits, fast download speeds, streaming limits: are some sites in the network treated as premium sites, requiring extra payment to access those sites.
Minor factors: is the content exclusive, pre-checked cross-sale on join page, choice of billing agent (is the site easy to cancel, does the customer service team respond to questions or problems).
I don't bother using the formulaic approach that TBP uses, where different reviewers are able to follow set rules and get a score that matches the other reviewers' score within a point or two.
I am impressed by the criteria that TBP uses to score a site: the listing is detailed. But my mind can't process each factor into a score and then combine the scores into a total score: too much analytics for me.
I prefer a looser approach, where I try to judge the value of a site for me, personally.
But I also try to indicate factors, plus or minus, that will be of interest to someone considering joining the site.
The New Sensations network currently consists of 26 sites (counting the New Sensations Network Home site as one of the sites).
In the reply section below, I list the sites that belong to the New Sensations network.
Just reading the site titles gives you an indication that the network covers many different niches.
So you can concentrate on the sites where the titles indicate they serve your interests.
Although, it also makes sense to at least give a cursory examination of each site, to see if any of the videos appeal to you.
THE SITES IN THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK ARE LISTED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership fee with PU discount. $9.95/month, or $79/year.
However, the site sometimes offers a lifetime membership for $99.
And with the lifetime offer for $99, they usually add a 1-month membership to the Playboy site or the Naked News site.
PU lists a lifetime membership for $1,000. That is a ridiculous price.
If you want a lifetime membership, wait for a holiday, and they might offer the $99 lifetime membership. But great sites like MetArt and Hegre offer lifetime memberships that are far cheaper, especially during holiday discounts, than the $1,000 membership offer from Mr.Skin.
-The easiest way to search for nudity by actresses.
Just put the name of the actress in the search box, and you get her clips at Mr.Skin.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading of the clips. However, the clips only download in one definition.
Cons:
-Almost all clips are either softcore or non-nude. No hardcore clips.
-Most clips are short: two minutes or less. I guess the idea is to skip to the good parts, but what happens is you get a peek at a breast, and wonder: is that all?
I have some fond memories of nude scenes in films, but even the clips that supposedly feature those movies are disappointing: there is no build-up to the scene, quality of the clip is usually poor, and the impact of the clip is: so what? So instead of re-living the excitement of the original scene, you're watching a shortened, unsatisfying, poor quality version of a snippet that has lost most meaning.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
The theme of Mr.Skin is "Fast-Forwarding to the Good Parts, Since 1999!"
However, there are problems with this approach:
-The main problem is that you drop the set-up which gives most of the meaning to the scene. The clip is either non-nude, or a very brief glimpse of the actresses breasts.
Or you might see the actress' ass.
So it doesn't have the impact or meaning of the original scene.
Also, the quality of the clip is often poor. The clips, I assume are from the original DVD or movie, but the crispness and color and image-quality if often degraded from the orginal, which detracts from the impact.
If you are a fan of nude celebs, this is probably the easiest way to search for their nude content.
Although the internet has made it possible to search for nude content of celbrities (mainly actors), Mr.Skin makes it easy to find most of their nude appearances. However, there are two problems with Mr.Skin.
-The clips at Mr. Skin are very short, many of them are less than 1 or 2 minutes in runtime. So you might see a nude breast, but a lot of the clips don't feature nudity, just what Mr. Skin considers a sexy appearance.
-Many of the clips are low quality: I'm suprised at the poor quality of the clips. Since many of the clips are probably from DVDs or from an actual commercial movie, the clips should be much higher quality than they are.
And with lower quality, you lose much of the impact of the scene.
Not only do you lose the build-up to the scene, but the poor image quality reduces the value of the scene.
So, even though you have a convenient access to the nude scenes of actors, the site does not impress me very much.
There are some actresses who have done some erotic scenes, but I don't feel that the scenes shown on Mr. Skin are very erotic, because the scenes are too short or poor visual quality.
Also, almost all scenes shown on Mr. Skin are either non-nude or softcore. I certainly haven't seen all the clips at Mr. Skin, but there would be very few or no hardcore clips.
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
Many other PU members have given the site a score higher than 80.
So the value of the site is really based on personal preference:
I guess the site satisfies the element of curiousity: has this actress done a nude or semi-nude scene?
But the scene in the original movie would be far more erotic.
I bought a lifetime membership to Mr Skin for $99 about 2 years ago. The site is an easy way to check if an actress has done nudity: but for me, the clips are disappointing: they just lack impact.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Full featured site with you choice of streaming or downloading the videos in different definitions.
Downloading: 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
Streaming: 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
The videos are professionally shot: Excellent lighting, good sound control, good camera work, nice sets, etc.
-Most videos have an accompanying photo set. The photos sets are OK screencaps, but I've seen much better screen caps from other hardcore sites like Teen Mega World and Wow Girls and Wow Porn and All Fine Girls. (Actually, the Wow Girls and Wow Porn and All Fine Girls might be screen caps or actual photos, since the quality is excellent: far better than it used to be from years ago.)
Cons:
-The sex has a set-up story to make the sex more meaningful, except that some of the stories/plots are really stupid.
-Added to the stupid plots, the models are not actresses. There are a few sites where the models do a decent job of acting, but this site is not one of them.
-The models tend to overact with moans, groans, cries of fake excitement etc. during the sex, which makes the sex unrealistic. Toning it down a lot would make the sex better.
-Many of these videos are best watched while drunk, except that being drunk would make it harder to get off from the video.
-The production standard are good: nice sets, many of the models are attractive, but the stupid plots and childish acting and fake moans and groans and screams of excitement are a turn-off.
-My preference would be to watch a video where two girls meet, have sex and it's believable.
-Video files and photo sets download with a generic file name that should be changed.
File name of 96896.zip tells you nothing.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Change the file name to:
Model name_Site name_Date posted_Title of set_File definition.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
You watch a scene from Spartacus (the TV series 2010-2013), these are professional actors: in short scenes, that last only a few minutes to less than a minute, they can generate more heat and excitement than the entire video from a girlsway video. That's because, even though the Spartacus is a historical drama, the sex can seem real and immediate. The actress is desirable. The action is not hardcore porn, it's softcore porn, you don't get the close-up of the male penis or female vagina, but it can be much hotter, much more erotic, than the Girlsway videos, because of the professional plot, the good acting, the attractive actresses.
Is it fair to compare Girlsway, a porn site video to Spartacus, a professional TV production?
Yes, because many of the Spartacus scenes create more heat, more erotic content, than the Girlsway videos.
You don't need all the blood and guts of Spartacus to make heat and erotic content.
I find Teen Mega World, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls, do a better job of providing erotic content than Girlsway.
Pure Taboo, another selection of the Adult Time hub/network, does a great job of providing erotic content with high production standards.
The tone of the Pure Taboo videos is slightly dark (they use slightly dark lighting, and probably a sepia filter), and the plots involve taboos, punishment, or abuse, but this is an outstanding site.
I'm wandering away from the review of Girlsway because the site does not impress me very much.
I don't mind lesbian sex, but I want it to have some eroticism, some heat.
And, hopefully, if there's a plot, that the models can act a bit.
The models at Girlsway are attractive.
But they have limited acting skills, that destroy the believabilty of the video.
Bottom line summary:
High production values, attractive models. But the videos lack heat.
Giving Girlsway a score of 80.
Note: I have access to Girlsway through my membership in Adult Time. I did not pay a separate fee for Girlsway.
Adult Time is a fantastic deal, giving you access to many premium porn sites for a very low price or a free add-on to one of their member sites.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-First month PU discounted price of $14.95. Recurs at at $29.95/month.
-Site is part of the Fame Digital network. You get access to over 20 sites, including the main sites of: Devils Film Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silvia Saint Silverstone DVD
Any one of the sites listed above is worth the membership price. Plus you also get access to a boatload of additional hardcore porn at the other niche sites.
-The same login details (username and password) work for each of the sites you have access to.
-Login and member pages are https.
-There are trailers for the videos. So you can get a preview of the video instead of watching the entire video.
-There is 24/7 support on live chat, which is the best customer support service I've ever encountered.
Fast response, helpful agents who know how the site/network works.
Cons:
-The main con is they re-designed the site and network a few years back.
The re-design made the site and network harder to use, slower to navigate.
See the bottom line section for more details on the re-design flaws.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page. But this is standard for most porn sites.
-Billing agent is FameHelp. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are reliable and easy to deal with. However, I've used FameHelp a number of times in the past, and never had a problem with them.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Movies: 234
DVD: 58
Pornstars: 347
Those stats are for the Lesbian Factor site.
But with network access, you have thousands of videos, thousands of porn stars, thousands of pictures.
The re-design for the site/network made using the content much harder.
They eliminated the old drop-down menu that allowed you to easily switch between sites.
The old drop-down menu also made it easy to know what sites you had access to.
The contents of each site are no longer separated for each site, but you get videos from other sites shown on the content page for each site
So it's more difficult to explore what the contents of a site include (because you have random thumbnails from other network sites thrown in on each page).
If you are at this site, Lesbian Factor, the easiest way to switch to another site in the network is to open a new web page, and log in to the new site from there. Instead of simply hitting a drop-down menu to switch, which was the older design.
Not all changes were bad.
The old sites had model lists that often did not have a thumbnail for the model.
And finding her videos at the site was problematic.
The new model lists have photos for all the models I checked.
And the newer model page shows her videos at that site (not for the entire network).
Which makes it harder to find the model's content--since you have to search each site to see if she is present.
-This is a pro and a con: You get access to so much hardcore porn, that it's difficult to pore through all the content, to find what appeals to you. So you need energy and determination to slog through the material. But there are videos that can blow you away, the first time you see them. The raw energy and sex and physicality are impressive. Especially in some of the older scenes. You don't get the glamcore treatment, this is raw, hardcore sex. So it doesn't have the higher definition of current videos, expensive sets, or elaborate makeup for the models, but some of the older videos are gems.
I should mention that the site and network has an outstanding live chat support service.
The live chat support is 24/7. One of the best live chat services I've ever used.
The techs are quick to answer a chat, and are courteous and knowledgeable about using the site and network.
When I last joined, I had a few issues about the site re-design, and the live chat line was fast to respond, and answered my question easily. Much faster than waiting for an email response, and better than calling on the phone, since, for me, it's easier to read a text message on my computer than talking on the phone with no written record to refer to.
Many of the older scenes have a gonzo feel.
You can easily find some jiggering of the image (the camera is not held steady), a lack of focus (camera guy does not frame each shot very well) poor lighting, and other mistakes that take away from watching a porn scene.
The newer videos, in addition to higher definition, have better quality tech factors: focus, slightly better lighting, etc.
But don't expect the videos will match the glamcore sites like X-Art, Blacked, or Tushy in quality (definition, lighting, making the models glamourous, sound control, focus).
The Fame videos are basically gonzo hardcore sex.
Although there is a huge amount of content available in the network, because of navigation issues, it's hard to find the gems that you will appreciate.
I wish that they would go back to the old design, since it was much simpler, cleaner, easier to use.
But it's been around 4 years since they went to the new design, so that won't happen.
I'm giving the site and network a score of 80.
That's generous, because the network re-design really fucked up the value of the site and network, making it harder to find the content, to explore the content, to switch between sites, to know what specific sites you have access to, to find the content of a model.
But there are some videos that are really good, if you can find them.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you join through the Devils Film site, the price is $9.95 with a PU discount for the first month.
Note: that price has recently changed to $14.95/month with PU discount.
If you do a google search, you might be able to find a discounted price of $9.95 for the first month for Devils Film.
The price is $14.95/month with a PU discount if you join through the My Teen Oasis site.
-This is a member of the Fame Digital network. You get full access to over 20 separate sites in the Fame Digital network. Gamma Entertainment, which owns Fame Digital, also owns Evil Angel, which has a separate membership.
-Login details are the same for all the sites you have access to (don't need a separate username and password for each different site).
-Login to the site is through a secure server. Also, member pages are on a secure server.
-You are sent 2 confirming emails on joining. They contain your login details, your membership pricing details, and the last 4 digits of your credit card you used.
Cons:
-They did a network upgrade in 2017. They now use brighter thumbnail photos to make the network sites fresher and more appealing. However, the navigation is now clumsier, takes more effort to navigate within a site, and to switch between sites.
-The site/network has a ton of hardcore material. Finding the content that appeals to you requires stamina (to slog through the junk that is boring or less appetizing).
-A lot of the models have tattoos, which I don't like.
-A lot of the models have enhanced breasts, which I don't like.
-A medium-sized logo of the site appears on bottom right corner of the video.
-Poor model listing inside this site.
Bottom Line:
My Teen Oasis is a site featuring teen and twenty-something models (that are supposed to be teens, but look too old to be teens) in hardcore sex.
The sex is basically hardcore gonzo style.
Not too rough or violent, but far from the heartcore that is featured at X-Art, Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked.
I prefer the X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, Vixen or Diesel Access style videos.
Or the Teen Mega World videos, which have improved over the last few years with higher production values: the models at the competing sites are much more appealing, to me: the models at My Teen Oasis seem like whores doing their job: the models at the competing sites are less like whores, more like girls who are finding some excitement or pleasure in the sex.
Actually, a number of the models featured at My Teen Oasis are also featured at competing porn sites, but the action at the competing porn sites seems fresher, or more vivid, less gonzo. So even though My Teen Oasis features a large number of videos of hardcore sex, I prefer competing porn sites, where the videos are more appealing.
My main complaint about the site is that the recent site/network re-design made using the site/networkmore difficult: to find the contents, to see the model listings.
The old design was much more user-friendly.
Although the videos are professionally shot, I enjoy the videos at competing sites more.
Customer support is excellent: you have 24/7 access. You can use live chat, email, or the phone.
If you have any problem, I suggest live chat, since that is the fastest way to get a response. I chatted Customer Service a couple of times, and they solved my problems immediately.
The most famous sites include:
devils film
peter north
rocco siffredi
silvia saint
silverstone DVD
Access to any one of those 5 sites would justify your membership fee.
And you also get access to a number of other sites catering to special niches.
So, based on quantity alone, you are getting far more than your money's worth.
(Assuming that you are new to porn, or that you enjoy the gonzo style porn these sites feature.)
-A complete listing of the sites you currently have access to with a membership in Fame Digital network is shown on the first reply at the bottom of this review.
I'm giving the site a score of 80. This is not based on the value of the site itself, but is based on network access: a membership to My Teen Oasis gives you access to over 20+ sites in the Devils Film/Fame Digital network, thousands of hardcore gonzo videos covering many different niches.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the basic Team Skeet network.
She's New is one of the larger sites in the network, with 229 videos as of 2018-01-16.
-You have a number of choices to stream and/or download videos.
The definitions available include: low, medium, high, 720p, 1080p for download.
For streaming, the definitions include: low, medium, high, 720p.
-The photo sets can be viewed online in a slide show. Or they can be downloaded in your choice of low, medium or high definition.
-Also, for streaming or downloading, you can choose 1-minute clips of the video, or the entire video.
-There is also a trailer for the video, to give you a fast introduction of the video's content.
-So there has been a large amount of effort put into making the site user-friendly for streaming and downloading options.
Cons:
-A number of PU members have complained that the network is plagued by connection problems, making the network worthless. Slow connections resulting in inability to load pages, to stream or download site contents, etc. If you pay for a membership and are unable to view or download the contents, the money you spent for a membership is wasted.
I've been a member of the network for over 1 year, and have experienced few problems.
Some PU members have accused me of being a shill for Team Skeet, because I've stated on some of the complaints that my personal experience was good.
Anyway, it's worth noting that if you do experience connection problems with Team Skeet, you should ask for a refund of your membership fees.
-To enter the site, you have to pass through an ad-page with ads for different sites.
-Recent updates average 1 per month. But the network updates 1 per day.
-A personal quibble, but I don't like sites that split their offerings into a basic network, and a premium network.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):
Make the premium sites into a separate network, would be my solution.
-Most of the recent scenes follow the same basic script of interview, blowjob, fuck, and finish with stunt cock jisming on girl's face and tongue. Which gets repetitious.
When the site started, back in 2011, there was some variety in the sex with different set-ups.
But the current scenes are too repetitious to generate any heat or excitement. There's no tension or build-up.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line (start of):
Site theme: teens who are new to porn, or very early in their porn career.
The scene usually starts off with questions to the model about why she wants a porn career, what were her first sexual experiences, what kinds of sex does she like, etc. Then the girl strips and she gives the stunt cock a blowjob, they fuck, and the guy finishes on her face and tongue.
It's difficult to give a score to the site.
If you experience slow connection problems, and the site and network is not usable, then the score would be in the 50s.
But if you do not experience slow connection problems, the site and network is a worthwhile join, and a more reasonable score would be in the 80s.
The site and network offer a lot of attractive teen models.
The site and network structure gives many options for streaming and downloading the content.
The site gives you access to the basic team skeet network, which includes many different niches.
I'm giving the site a score of 80. That's because I personally have not experienced the slow connection speeds some PU members complain about. If I had experienced the bad connections, I would not have rejoined for a second year.
Although this site is large (229 videos and photo sets), it's not one of my favorites in the Team Skeet network.
Because I find most of the videos lack heat.
Then why give the site a score of 80? Because membership in the site gives you:
-access to the basic Team Skeet network, which currently has 27 sites covering a variety of teen niches.
-1400 models. Many of them attractive teens.
-2896 scenes. Most of the scenes are hardcore.
-A wide variety of options to use the videos and photosets: to stream and/or download.
I'm giving the site a higher score due to network access.
Also, I'm placing more weight on the huge quantity of videos and photo sets in many different niches.
If you prefer quality over quantity, you would give the site and network a lower score.
And if you experience a poor network connection, the site score would be in the 50s.
Bottom line:
I think Team Skeet is a worthwhile join.
As long as you don't experience the poor connection speeds some PU members get.
There's a large amount of teen porn, offered in many different niches.
A huge amount of teen models, many of them attractive.
Some sites should appeal to most people who are into teen porn.
In the first reply section below, I list the current sites available in the basic Team Skeet network.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO WRITE AND EDIT. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE.
-PU DISCOUNT OF $17.87/MONTH (RECURRING).
-EPOCH IS THE PRIMARY BILLER, A REPUTABLE COMPANY.
-LONG TIME BEFORE SITE TIMEOUT. THIS HELPS DOWNLOAD MANAGERS.
-DOWNLOAD MANAGERS ALLOWED.
-NO DRM.
-YOU CAN CHOOSE TO STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE VIDEOS.
-EACH VIDEO HAS A ZIPPED PHOTOSET.
-THE PHOTOSETS ARE GOOD QUALITY PHOTOS. THE MODELS ARE ATTRACTIVE.
Cons:
-THE MAJOR CON IS THAT SOME PU MEMBERS COMPLAIN ABOUT TERRIBLE CONNECTION SPEEDS WITH THE NETWORK.
THIS MEANS THEY HAVE PROBLEMS WITH DOWNLOADING FILES, STREAMING VIDEOS, AND/OR NAVIGATING THE SITE/NETWORK.
THE PROBLEMS SEEM HIT OR MISS. SOME MEMBERS EXPERIENCE THESE PROBLEMS, OTHER MEMBERS REPORT THAT THEY DO NOT. I PERSONALLY HAVE NOT HAD ANY MAJOR PROBLEMS WITH THE SITE/NETWORK, AND HAVE BEEN A CONTINUOUS MEMBER FOR OVER 12 MONTHS NOW.
-THE LUST HD SITE AVERAGES 1 UPDATED VIDEO/PHOTOSET PER MONTH. HOWEVER, THE BASIC NETWORK UPDATES DAILY (1 VIDEO/PHOTOSET PER DAY).
-MOST OF THE NETWORK CONTENTS IS EXCLUSIVE. HOWEVER, THE RUB-A-TEEN SITE CONTENTS ARE ALSO FOUND AT TEEN MEGA WORLD (THE TRICKY MASSEUR SITE) AND AT THE DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK.
SEE THE BOTTOM LINE SECTION FOR MORE EXAMPLES OF NON-EXCLUSIVE TEAM SKEET CONTENT.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
-NON-SECURE LOGIN TO MEMBER AREA.
-NON-SECURE MEMBER PAGES. WHICH MEANS YOUR ISP KEEPS A RECORD OF YOUR PAYSITE VISITS.
Bottom Line:
-THIS IS ONE OF THE BETTER SITES IN THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK.
THE SITE IS TEAM SKEET'S GLAMCORE OFFERING.
-THAT MEANS:
-THE MODELS ARE AMONG THE BEST LOOKING MODELS OF THE NETWORK.
-THE MODELS ARE MADE UP TO LOOK THEIR BEST: MAKE-UP, COSTUME, SETTING.
-THE SEX IS HARDCORE, BUT WITH A LOT OF KISSING AND EROTICISM THAT GOES BEYOND TWO BODIES SLAPPING AGAINST EACH OTHER.
THE BEST PORN (TBP) REVIEW SITE STATES THAT ALL THE CONTENT AT THIS SITE AND AT THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK IS EXCLUSIVE.
I'VE WRITTEN REVEIWS AT PU FOR SEVERAL YEARS NOW, THAT STATE THAT ALL (OR ALMOST ALL) THE CONTENT AT THE RUB A TEEN SITE (OF TEAM SKEET) IS ALSO FOUND AT TEAM MEGA WORLD (AT THE TRICKY MASSEUR SITE), AND AT DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK.
THERE ARE OTHER EXAMPLES WHERE CONTENT FROM THE TEAM SKEET SITES CAN BE FOUND AT OTHER PAY SITES.
FOR EXAMPLE:
AT LUST HD, THE VIDEO/PHOTOSET TITLED "EURO TEEN THREESOME", POSTING DATE 2016-01-11, WAS POSTED AT FIRSTBGG ON 2015-10-03 (FIRSTBGG IS PART OF THE TEEN MEGA WORLD NETWORK). THAT SAME VIDEO WAS ALSO POSTED AT TEENDREAMS ON 2016-02-23.
AT LUST HD, THE VIDEO/PHOTOSET TITLED "HOT AND HEAVENLY", POSTED 2017-09-02, HAS THE SAME PHOTOSET AT ALL FINE GIRLS (PART OF THE DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK) POSTED 2017-11-04. THE ACCOMPANYING VIDEO WILL PROBABLY BE POSTED LATER AT THE DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK.
SO THERE IS SOME NON-EXCLUSIVE CONTENT AT LUST HD AND AT OTHER SITES IN THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK.
HOWEVER, THE BULK OF THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK IS EXCLUSIVE, I BELIEVE.
BOTTOM LINE: LUST HD IS A FINE ADDITION TO THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK.
IF YOU HAVEN'T EXPERIENCED GLAMCORE PORN, THIS IS AN INEXPENSIVE INTRODUCTION: BECAUSE THE SITE MEMBERSHIP IS $17.87/MONTH (RECURRING) WITH A PU DISCOUNT. AND YOU ALSO GET ACCESS TO THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK OF OVER 20 SITES WHICH COVER A WIDE VARIETY OF TEEN NICHES.
I HATE TO KEEP REPEATING MYSELF, BUT THE MAIN PROBLEM WITH TEAM SKEET IS THAT SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE COMPLAINED ABOUT TERRIBLE CONNECTION SPEEDS, WHICH AFFECTS DOWNLOADING, STREAMING, AND NAVIGATING THE NETWORK.
IF YOU JOIN AND EXPERIENCE THESE PROBLEM, I RECOMMEND ASKING FOR A REFUND OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP PRICE.
EITHER TEAM SKEET, OR EPOCH, THEIR PRIMARY BILLER, SHOULD AGREE TO THE REFUND.
IF YOU GET ACCEPTABLE CONNECTION SPEEDS, THEN THE TEAM SKEET MEMBERSHIP TO THE 20+ SITES IS DEFINITELY A WORTHWHILE JOIN, IF YOU ARE INTO TEEN PORN.
GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 80.
1. THE SITE ITSELF IS A GOOD GLAMCORE SITE.
2. SITE MEMBERSHIP GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK OF 20+ SITES.
3. MOST OF THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK CONTENT IS EXCLUSIVE.
4. MOST OF THE TEAM SKEET CONTENT WAS PROFESSIONALLY SHOT. GOOD LIGHTING, GOOD FOCUS, GOOD COLORS, GOOD SOUND CONTROL, ETC.
5. THE SITE (AND NETWORK) OFFERS MULTIPLE CHOICES FOR BOTH STREAMING AND DOWNLOADING THE VIDEOS.
6. THE PHOTOSET FOR EACH VIDEO CAN BE VIEWED ONLINE OR DOWNLOADED IN A ZIP FILE.
THE ONLINE MECHANISM FOR VIEWING THE PHOTOS IN A PHOTOSET IS FAST AND EASY TO USE.
BOTTOM LINE: I WOULD RATE THE SITE/NETWORK HIGHER, EXCEPT THAT SOME PU MEMBERS COMPLAIN ABOUT THE NETWORK PROBLEMS.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT.
-$14.95 FOR FIRST MONTH WITH PU DISCOUNT. RECURS AT $29.95/MONTH.
-SECURE LOGIN PAGE.
-SECURE MEMBER SITE PAGES.
-SOME TRANNY MODELS CAN BE SURPRISINGLY ATTRACTIVE, ONCE YOU WRAP YOUR HEAD AROUND THE FACT THEY ARE TRANNYS. THIS IS A NICHE, BUT IT'S BEING INCREASINGLY ACCEPTED BY SOCIETY, AS SHOWN BY THE SAG AND GOLDEN GLOBE AWARDS GIVEN TO THE TRANSPARENT SERIES AND ACTORS. HAVING SAID THAT, I'M STRAIGHT, AND I THINK IT WOULD BE EASIER TO WATCH TWO GAY MEN HAVING SEX INSTEAD OF A TRANNY AND A MALE PARTNER.
-CHOICE OF DOWNLOAD DEFINITION FROM 160p TO 1080p.
-CHOICE OF STREAMING DEFINITION FROM 160p TO 1080p.
-THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT: EXCELLENT LIGHTING, GOOD FOCUS, GOOD SOUND CONTROL.
-NO DRM.
-LONG TIME BEFORE SITE TIME-OUT.
-NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-SITE ACCEPTS DOWNLOAD MANAGERS.
Cons:
-UPDATES EVERY FEW DAYS. EXCEPT NO UPDATES IN SEPTEMBER 2017.
-I CAN'T FIND A MODEL LISTING FOR THE TRANNY PROS AT THE SITE (IF YOU WANT TO FIND WHAT VIDEOS A TRANNY APPEARS IN).
-YOU CAN'T EXPECT PORN MODELS TO BE PROFESSIONAL ACTORS, BUT THE MODELS/STUNT COCKS AT TRANNY PROS WOULD BE MORE CONVINCING IF THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO SPEAK. OR YOU COULD JUST MUTE THE SOUND.
-SITE/NETWORK UPDATED THE STRUCTURE A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO. MADE THE SITE/NETWORK APPEAR BRIGHTER, MORE MODERN. EXCEPT IT MESSED UP THE NAVIGATION: MAKING IT HARDER TO FIND THE SEPARATE SITES, WHAT THE VIDEOS ARE IN A SITE, HOW TO SWITCH BETWEEN SITES.
ACCESS TO ANY ONE OF THE 5 SITES LISTED ABOVE WOULD NORMALLY BE WORTH THE LOW MEMBERSHIP PRICE OF $14.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.
HOWEVER, THE NETWORK DID AN UPDATE A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, MAKING NAVIGATING THE SITES MORE DIFFICULT. THE OLD STRUCTURE WAS MUCH EASIER TO USE, TO SEE WHAT EACH SITE HAD TO OFFER, TO ACCESS THE SITE VIDEOS. ELIMINATING THE DROP-DOWN-LISTING WAS A MAJOR MISTAKE.
TRANNY PROS SITE HAS 645 VIDEOS. THESE ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT VIDEOS, SO IT'S A LARGE SITE, AND THE UPDATES KEEP COMING. SO I ASSUME THERE IS DEMAND FOR THE NICHE.
I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 80. THAT IS BASED ON:
-THE LARGE NUMBER OF GOOD QUALITY VIDEOS;
-THE SECURE SITE LOGIN AND SECURE SITE MEMBER PAGES;
-THE ACCESS TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK SITES, WHICH IS A MAJOR HARDCORE NETWORK;
-THE CUSTOMER SUPPORT TEAM IS FIRST-RATE AND IS 24/7. THE CHAT ANSWERS IN A FEW MINUTES, AND CAN BE BOTH HELPFUL AND PATIENT.
-I'M DEDUCTING 10 POINTS FROM THE SCORE, BECAUSE I THINK THE NETWORK UPDATE IMPLEMENTED ABOUT 2 MONTHS AGO MADE NAVIGATING THE SEPARATE SITES HARDER.
I THINK THE TRANNY PROS SITE IS LARGE AND EXCELLENT FOR THE NICHE. THIS SITE/NETWORK HAS PUT A LOT OF TIME AND MONEY AND EFFORT INTO MAKING THE SITE CONTENTS.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Automatic login to site (if you have cookies enabled). When you go to the site, you are automatically logged in, without having to re-enter your username and password.
-Works with Roku.
-Homepage acts like a table of contents:
--Gives list of anchors (both lead and guest), with nice-sized thumbnails and links to their bios.
(Trying to make a connection to the member so member will be more interested in the site)
--Amateur Auditions. Follow the search for our next anchor
(Same idea of making a connection to the member.)
--Recent listing of news features.
-Bonus content from Mr. Skin, a sister site of celebrity nudity.
-Cam show for site.
-Updates 6 days a week (so 6 new shows per week).
-Multiple download options.
--You can download the entire day's show, or specific segments of the show.
--You have choice of 480p, 720p, 1080p defintion for the download.
-When the news anchor finishes her segment, she turns and walks away. So you can watch her front and back jiggle.
Cons:
-If you want to post comments about the site, there is no internal page on the site.
Instead, you are supposed to post at the Site's facebook page.
Since I don't have a facebook account, this is a negative for me.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Billing processor is third-party company I never heard of.
-This is a softcore site that features female nudity. But no sex.
-I don't know how long the strip/nudity feature will hold your interest.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: news read by anchors who strip and go nude.
So it makes the news more watchable than a regular news program.
Except that a regular news program probably covers a wider range of subjects.
If you like their models, it makes the news much more interesting, to see them strip while reporting the news.
The stripping is not a strip-tease act, the anchors/models just take off their clothes while reading the news.
You have a number of regular female anchors.
You also have a number of guest anchors.
It's a nice idea, the first few times you watch.
Except they must be doing OK. Because this site has been around since 2000. And they update 6 times a week, so they are doing much better than I would have thought.
There is a blog.
The blog is useful, because it lists some of the main headlines for each newscast.
So if you want a preview or summary of each day's newscast, this is the the best source.
You can stream or download each news cast.
$15.00/month with PU discount.
The site is not expensive, but does not appeal to me personally.
The anchors/models are not selected to be the most physically attractive. Some are good-looking, but other anchors are just average-looking.
And some models have implants, or tattoos, which I dislike. That's a personal preference.
You can do search by news anchor, by segment, by date.
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
The site structure/navigation is good.
The videos are professionally shot.
The choices to stream or download are varied.
You get 6 updates per week.
Do I recommend this site?
It's not a bad site. But I would have thought it had limited appeal. However, as I wrote, it's been around since 2000, and still updates 6 days a week, and the site is well-managed software-wise. (I did not find any dead links).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This is part of the Porn Pros network. Site membership gives you access to 22 sites.
-With 22 sites, you get a wide variety of porn niches.
-Large amount of content in the network. Over 3,00 videos.
-The models are late teens, early twenties. Mostly attractive.
-Try to select Epoch as the billing agent. A trusted name.
-You can stream videos in standard or high definition.
-You can download videos in 480p or 1080p definition.
-Each video comes with a matching photoset. The photos are high-quality screencaps.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale. Even if you uncheck the cross-sale, you might still be charged for the cross-sale.
So check your email confirmation, or your credit card company, to see if you are signed up for the cross-sale site. If you are signed up for the cross-sale site, either dispute the charge, or cancel immediately, before it turns into an expensive charge for a site you probably did not want.
-Slow update rate. About 1 new scene per week for the entire network.
-$69.95 charge to upgrade to all the premium sites in the network.
-Have to click through an offer to upgrade to premium status to enter the main member site.
-Some of the statistics given for scenes are false. Example: The time/lengh of the video titled "Tennis Tease" featuring Cece Capella is shown as 00:01 (one second). But the video has a runtime of 25 minutes 13 seconds.
Actually, most of the videos show a time/length of 0 or 1 or 2 seconds. Which makes no sense.
CONS CONTINUED BELOW:
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
My guess is that the site software engineer put a marker to show the runtime of each video.
But then did not follow through, and the static runtimes shown are 00.00 or 00.01 or 00.02.
However, when you play the video, you can see the actual runtime at the bottom of the screen.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site theme: Guys posting videos of former girlfriends for revenge. Which is fake. The girls are porn stars/models.
Actually, that might have been the original theme of the site. But for the last few years, the videos do not emphasize or show the ex-girlfriend theme. The videos are basically just a guy and girl fucking. With no background theme information to show the girl is a former girlfriend.
This is part of the Porn Pros network.
So membership to this site gives you access to the Porn Pros network. You get access to 22 sites in the Porn Pros network:
Most of the sites update rarely or not at all.
In the last 30 days, the entire network added 5 new scenes.
So that works out to 1 new scene per week.
The number of scenes per site ranges from 4 at Lolcumshots to 571 at Realexgirlfriends.
Obviously, the sites with more content have more value.
My favorite site is Massagecreep.
Many of the girls are attractive, and the sex can be hot.
Realexgirlfriends is the largest site in the network (of the basic network, not including the premium sites).
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
This is based on the large amount of network videos you have access to.
The videos are mainly professionally shot.
The models are mainly attractive.
The site navigation is easy.
So you get a lot of hardcore teen videos, for a discounted PU price of $17.95/month.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Over 1,300 models.
-The network covers a number of niche fantasies: screwing the babysitter, the naughty high school girl, small girls, teen pies, anal, blowjobs, massage, etc.
-Many of the girls are attractive. But the site does not put a lot of effort into presenting them at their most attractive.
-CCBILL is the payment processor. A trusted name.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on signup (that I can remember).
-Currently, there is a special link at TBP for a rate of $9.87/month (recurring).
I don't know how long that rate will be available.
-One update per day for the network.
-24 sites in the network.
-You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition.
-You also have the choice of low, medium or high definition for video downloads.
Cons:
-Have to pass through a upsell page (with ads) to enter the main site.
-Ads clutter the pages.
-Some of the network sites are premium sites, that you have to pay extra to access.
-The models are teens, many of them attractive. But not much effort is put into making the models appear attractive: either in make-up, costume, sets, or superior camera-work.
You have hundreds of cute models: Alice Green, Alice March, Apolonia Lapiedra, Kharlie Stone, Dillon Harper, Alexia Gold, etc. But the models appear so much more attractive when presented at some other paysites.
-The content is advertised as 100% exclusive. But many of the Rub-A-Teen site videos are found at Teen Mega World (at their Tricky Masseur site) and at Diesel network (at the All Fine Girls site).
-The camera-work of the videos is often mediocre. The video is not smooth, the lighting is just OK, the sets are inexpensive. A good amateur would shoot better videos than many of the Team Skeet videos.
Bottom Line:
Team Skeet is a network of hardcore teen sites.
-Over 20 sites.
-Over 1,300 models.
-Over 2,300 videos
With over 20 sites, you get a nice variety of teen fantasy themes.
The acting is mainly poor. The girls are usually attractive, but not much effort is put into making the girls appear attractive.
For example, Apolonia Lapiedra appears at Team Skeet and at MetArt. At MetArt, she is gorgeous: Lovely face, great body.
At Team Skeet, she appears in two videos.
I know it's the same girl, because the name is the same (which is unusual with porn models, because they often have a number of different names for different sites). And Apolonia has the same physical characteristics:
long black hair, face and body resembles the MetArt girl.
If I saw this Team Skeet girl at a shopping mall, I would not give her a second look.
She's nothing special (appearance-wise) in her Team Skeet videos.
What the fuck? I'm being serious.
She is a jewel at MetArt.
She is a piece of meat at Team Skeet.
I don't mean Team Skeet is a gonzo site.
But they took a great-looking model, and present her as a average-looking or below-average-looking teen in her videos.
It just makes you realize that not only is porn fantasy, but that the camera-work can make an incredible difference in how appealing some of these models are. Which I already knew. But what a waste of talent to take these attractive girls and present them without their natural sparkle.
That is why I give MetArt a score of 99.
And Team Skeet a score of 80.
(But there are other reasons why I give Team Skeet a score of 80):
-The poor quality of the videos: they need to hire a professional for their camera work.
-The cheap sets.
-This is a personal quirk, but I don't like "Unlock" sites in the network that require added payments to access their content. If I pay for a membership, give me access to all the sites, and don't tease me with added sites that require more money.
They are already using part of the page space to advertise other non-related sites.
So they are over-loading you with advertisements to take your money. I paid for a membership.
Let me enjoy it in peace.
End of rant.
For bread-and-butter hardcore teen porn, I much prefer Teen Mega World, over Team Skeet.
Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) is borderline between gonzo and glamcore.
Diesel has outstanding models (physically attractive), and they look great in the photos and videos.
For glamcore, X-Art and Blacked and Tushy are outstanding sites.
Lovely models, presented with care and precision to look gorgeous: with great camera-work, expensive sets, etc.
The Best Porn review writes in his latest review on Team Skeet (released Jul 22, 2016):
"One of the best networks of teen-oriented sites on the Net."
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PU shows a discounted price of $14.87/month recurring. But when you click on the link to the site, and hit the join page, it shows a join price of $17.87/month (recurring).
-This is the largest site in the Team Skeet network. 427 videos as of 2016-07-10.
-Epoch is the primary biller, a trusted name.
-Numerous options for video download: low, medium, high, 720p, 1080p.
-Good download speeds. I get 3-5 MB/sec. My max speed is about 5+ MB/sec.
-Access to the rest of the Team Skeet network with membership in any of their sites.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-The site theme is innocent high school girls having sex. But most of the models look like sluts who are too old for high school. And they sure as hell don't look innocent. So that takes away from the fantasy element of porn.
-Update rate is 2 videos per month. But you get 1 video per day for the Team Skeet network.
-Some of the models in these videos are actually pretty: Jenna Reid, Alice March, Alexa Grace,some others. But the videos don't use the attractive models to create videos that have interest or value. Part of the problem is the script/plot is so stupid, part is the acting is so terrible, it reduces the value of the videos. You don't watch porn for the acting or script, but jesus, if you have horrible actors, don't require them to act. And if you can't write a script, don't bother, just show the sex.
-A lot of ads for other paysites on every page you look at inside the site.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: innocent high school girls having sex.
Not much effort is put into making these models attractive. Even models who are normally attractive come across as not especially attractive: for example, Jenna Reid, Alice March, Alexa Grace are definitely good-looking women. But you wouldn't know it from their videos at Innocent High.
Many of the models don't look like they are in high school, unless they have been held back a few years.
The site would be better named: "horny school girls having sex".
And the models certainly don't act innocent.
This is the largest site in the Team Skeet network, with 427 scenes.
The site does offer a wide selection of definitions for download, from very low (for portable) to 720p and 1080p.
Most of the scenes take place in a classroom. The plot get repetitious fast. There's not a lot of male talent used: you get the same faces again and again. The male talent are supposed to be professional school teachers, but they look like
poor white trash.
Maybe they should name the site: "Skummy models get fucked by poor white trash"? That would be descriptive, and truthful.
I'm a fan of teen porn, softcore or hardcore. I think MetArt has great value, Teen Mega World, X-Art, Diesel and a bunch of other sites too numerous to mention are outstanding value.
But I like my teens to be attractive. To look like teens (or early twenties). Innocent High is not one of my favorite sites.
The teen models (if they are teens) look older, and not attractive.
The scenes are poorly acted, with stupid plot lines.
I'm giving the site a score of 80. That's not for the site itself, but because you have access to the entire Team Skeet network, which does have a lot of good scenes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main attraction of the site is Japanese porn that is not pixellated (no mosaic censorship over the genitals).
-PU discounted membership of $19.95/month
-Epoch is billing agent. A trusted name.
-Large site. 942 videos. Same number of accompanying galleries.
-Multiple choices for streaming: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-The same multiple choices for download: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-The file name includes the name of the model. But it's better to rename the file with the date it was posted to the site, and the name of the site.
-The videos are professionally shot. Good camera work, good lighting, sound control.
-The videos have the posting date to the site.
-There is an element of Japanese flavor to the videos, which can make them slightly more interesting than the regular American or European porn. This can be positive or negative.
-Site is part of the JAV HD network. Membership in the site gives access to the full JAV network, and vice versa.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
-Search engine is poor. Enter the name of the model, and the search returns her name a bunch of names that are not hers.
-The Japanese models can make funny noises during sex, which can be annoying.
-The Japanese are big on vibrators, of different sizes and colors, and love to use them on the models. If you don't like sex toys, you won't appreciate many of the videos.
-Some members might be disappointed that the Japanese sex scenes are not hugely different from American or European sex scenes. Like the old wives' tale how Asian women have a "sideways vagina". Women are women. There are physiological
differences between races, but there's also a lot of nonsense about the differences.
-No zip file for the photo sets.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics: 942 videos.
Site theme: girls with pubic hair.
Site contents: uncensored (no pixillation) videos and photos of Japanese models having sex.
Some people think girls with pubic hair are attractive. Other people think pubic hair is dirty or unpleasant, and think all girls should feature the "nude" pussy that is so common in today's porn models.
Actually, it's not just porn models who have the hairless pussy fashion.
I did a google search, and found what I thought was an interesting result:
From 2 studies done in 2014 on 1,100 college-student participants (671 self-reported women, and 439 self-reported men),
nearly half the men in the study said they’d shaved off all their pubic hair at least once in the previous four weeks.
I had my pubic hair shaved for an operation once (I was in a hospital at the time), but never bothered shaving or trimming it myself.
About 95% of people in the study said they’d done some sort of pubic hair removal at least once in the past four weeks.
This would include minor trimming to a complete shave.
I don't think the hair down below grows all that long, anyway. It's not like the hair on your head, which just keeps growing longer.
(This review is getting a little strange. But interesting, I hope.)
My pubic hair, which is over 30 years old (since I was shaved for that operation), is less than 2 inches long. On some hairy models, the pubic hair might be over 2 inches long, but still under 4 inches. So even with a "jungle look", pubic hair is still short.
But I have read many complaints at porn sites when a model has pubic hair. They say the model is unclean, or less attractive, and should be bald down there. As if that was the way nature intended. Or God intended. Or fashion intended.
Or some other reason, that seems to be implied, but not always stated.
There are porn sites that serve the hairy niche. Hairy AV (part of JAV HD network) is one.
ATK Natural & Hairy is another.
Love Hairy (part of MetArt network) is another site.
Japanese porn seems to love vibrators. Dildos are also popular, but not as popular as vibrators. The vibrators come in all sizes and shapes, from very tiny to the industrial-sized. They also come in all colors.
I went on the U.S. version of Amazon.com, and they have 123 pages of vibrators.
The Amazon.com page shows 24 varieties of vibrators per page.
Counting duplicate listings, that would be almost 3,000 models of vibrators.
So I guess that vibrators are more popular in America than I realized.
I've been watching porn for years now, but I still have a lot to learn.
Maybe the Japanese aren't so crazy after all. They love vibrators, just like Americans. And Europeans. And maybe Africans, as well.
Basic site overview: Hairy AV focuses on hairy Japanese models. The videos and photos are not censored, which is the primary selling point of the site. The models are attractive. The videos are professionally shot, so you get crisp, clear views of these lovely girls in a wide variety of sex acts: blowjobs, self masturbation, masturbation from one or more men on a single women (anyway from 1 to 5 or 6 men on the same woman), vaginal and anal fucking (mostly vaginal), titty fucking, etc.
So the sex can be hot. But it's not excessively forceful or cruel. It's not the hard gonzo sex you see on some European sites. The sex is more consensual, where the woman's pleasure is important, and it's not just the guys getting off.
You have access to the 942 videos at the site, with almost daily updates of a single video per day, but you also have access to all the JAV HD sites, which has 16 sites and 16,528 videos in different categories.
Note: I suspect the 16,529 videos is a slight exaggeration of the site statistic, because it probably contains some videos that are posted to different sites in the network, possibly with different titles for the same video. Because I have found some videos that are posted to more than one site, and the same video will have a different title depending on which site the video is posted to.
Note: If you join through the JAV HD site, the PU discounted price is $39.99/month. This gives access to the whole JAV HD network.
But if you join through the Hairy AV site, the PU discounted price is $19.99/month. This gives you access to the whole JAV HD network, as well.
Giving the site a score of 80. You get access to 942 videos at the site, over 15,000 at the network, uncensored, high quality videos of attractive Japanese models engaging in hot sex. So it's worth considering, if you want a change from the American or European porn you've become accustomed to.
But don't expect a massive difference between the Japanese porn and the American or European porn you've already seen, if you have at least a moderate amount of porn experience. Sex is sex. The flavor might be Japanese, but it's not watching Aliens from Beyond in sexual heat that will blow your mind.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name.
-Professionally shot videos: good camera work, sound control, editing, lighting, etc.
-Good download speeds. I averaged between 1 to 3 MB/sec.
-There is a photo set illustrating/accompanying each scene, that shows you clearly what the video scene will show.
-Can stream or download each video. Each stream or download has choices for the quality of the scene. From mobile to HD quality.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-No zip file for the photo sets.
-Poor search engine.
Bottom Line:
65 scenes
Features Japanese models in outdoor sex: in the street, at a pool, at the beach, at a park, wherever.
This would approximate the public nudity category for American/European porn.
Since there are only 65 scenes, this is a small site, and the content can be easily scanned by glancing over the thumbnail for each scene, with the brief scene description.
Even though 65 scenes seems like a small amount of content, you get a nice array of sex acts: masturbation, toys (vibrators and dildos), girl-girl, boy-girl, two-or-more-boys with one girl, blowjobs, fucking, etc.
The models are attractive young Japanese in their late teens or early twenties. Very little tattoos or piercings. Most models have pubic hair. Although the Japanese models exhibit the Asian shyness toward sex, it is evident they are enjoying the sex, with their funny noises and moans. The sex is not rough or abusive. And the girls seem to give blow jobs like they are born to it.
Because you haven't seen these models before, it adds an element of freshness to the scenes, even if the sex is not radically different from American or European sex scenes. Except:
1. the flavor is different, because these are Japanese models, which have a slightly different attitude to sex.
2. the models are Japanese, not European or American.
3. most of the models are cute or attractive. Slender bodies. Young faces.
4. no plastic breasts that I could see. These models are natural.
Some of the models, like Misaki Oosawa, have such innocent, doll-like faces, with perky bodies, that you wonder why they got into porn in the first place. I guess there's an excess of cute Japanese models that can't succeed in the gravure niche so they gravitate into AV idols (AV = Adult Video).
I think Japanese (and Chinese) models are some of the most beautiful women in the world.
Giving the site a score of 80. Because I really like how attractive some of the models are. But if you are less impressed by the models, you could easily give the site a lower score. I realize I am being very subjective about the score for this site. And I've read comments that the sex could be considered bland or raunchy. Different people can have very different opinions about this site, or about anything else, for that matter.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
