Yeah, I don't mind photoshopping that much, it is certainly super common, particular on the art nude sites. it is just odd to see it and then it disappears, then see it again. Its sort of half-assed photoshopping, and distracts me for some reason.
Going through a couple of photosets from here, I suddenly realized that they edit out tattoos in some of their shoots, Now, I'm no fan of tramp stamps, but it seems kind of odd. Especially given the inconsitency, it is in one shot, gone in the next. Does make me wonder how much photo modification they do here...
glad you don't hate it, man. I was fearing your wrath!
did you join the network or just 18onlygirls? there was something when i joined about getting free access to an additional site, but since i joined the network this didn't apply to me.
It isn't really a clone anymore they release material on the two sites seperately now - although the older material is pretty commonly shared. The videos I dowloaded all seemed fine to me, the camerawork can be a bit poor - given the self-shot nature of some of the shoots, but this didn't really bother me that much The mid-mp4 was plenty crisp for me.
I went all the way back to their 2007 releases, and they have both low and high h.264 videos (mp4). I'm pretty sure they had these when I was a member here last time...
I agree the login is fucking irritating, but they email you a link now that fills out all the security info for you except the captcha.
I can understand the frustration of joining a site and finding a lot of duplicate material from another site, I haven't seen any of that lately, but maybe its just new to me.
I'm not sure about your complaint on variety, there are 300 models on this site. Given they are all young, and euro, so there isn't a lot of variety in ethnicity or age. But I think it is a reasonable variety of models that is consistent with most euro sites.
Everyone has their own tastes I suppose, I think the material is pretty good here and I don't feel as though I wasted my money. I guess maybe I go against the grain sometimes, I for one can't understand why people like 21sextury so much, that place just pisses me off for some reason.
To each their own, I suppose. I also read Denner's review, and I agree with many of his cons for the site, browsing photos on the site is a nuisance, although I usually just check a couple and download the zip if it looks good so this didn't bother me. This site and Youngporn.net share a lot of the same content, especially with older material, however newer updates appear to be released seperately on each site. I am not sure why they don't just merge the two given the large amount of overlap.
I think most of their newer content has been good to me, I hope you like it if you join, I don't need any more enemies!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-attractive, mostly euro ladies
-good variety of content, ranging from very softcore to group
-reasonable update schedule usually 1 photo or video set per day
-good navigation, search, tags, model index, ratings
-custom zip downloads of photosets
-no DRM
-download managers work
-no apparent download limit
-largely original content, the newer stuff appears entirely original
-decent sized site, 308 models at the time of this review
-video quality decent, downloadable in 3 sizes for the newer videos HD wmv, high mp4, and low mp4. I usually just downloaded the high mp4 which is typically 640x360 3700 kbps and reasonably crisp.
-photo quality is good, newer photos are 4032x6048 and reasonably well photographed
Cons:
-not a fan of accessing through the deisel access site
-no bonus content unless you pay extra
-if you pay extra for the bonus content, there is a lot of duplicate scenes across the network
-some of the paid bonus sites are no longer updating
-site can load sort of slow at times, even though download speeds were always better than 1 MB/sec
-since some of the material appears to be self produced by the talent, the video and photo camerawork can get a bit iffy at times
Bottom Line:
Overall I think this site is pretty decent, my only hesitation with the site is whether or not it is worth the extra $10 to join the network.
Given that Policeman.net, Kamilla18.com, thespermlover.com, sashafucksdasha.com, and laythekat.com all appear to be no longer updating, it is probably not worth joining the network if you have been a member of it before. However, if you haven't it is probably worth considering spending the extra $10. While there is duplicate content all over the network, there are some unique scenes to each site, especially on the individual model sites.
Bottom line, I like the variety of the site, and that generally the photography is pretty good, especially with the softcore material. It would be nice if they could get some of the models to do more work in the studio with professional photographers, especially with the hardcore material. They could also do some work to fix some of their website load issues. Even with the sites drawbacks, I still think it is worth joining for a month if you are into attractive young ladies.
Just thought I'd point out your login for the trial appears to work with other TonyBucks sites aside from Spunky Bee and Rough 18 as the site says. I tried it with TinSeks and it worked fine there.
Downloads are slow, and I agree with WittyGuy, that it probably isn't worth hanging around here for long.
I agree that scoring is very subjective, and I wasn't intending to throw it out there as a disagreement with you, that was just my opinion of the network so far - sorry if I came off as compative. I have been pleasantly surprised so far, and there are a good number of models I hadn't ever seen before. The outdoor sex site and light bondage site are both pretty decent as well.
I haven't downloaded a huge amount of stuff from here yet, but I'll have to check out Klara.
I would say, that while the navigation is better than the rest of the network, it isn't exactly good (different models listed under same name, same model listed under different names, etc.). There are also some duplicate scenes across the network. Also, download speeds are a bit inconsistent for my tastes.
All the same, I agree with most of your points, I'd probably score it a smidge lower - maybe 86 or something including the bonus sites.
I agree that the material is definitely better than most euro sites, and plenty of American ones.
I hadn't really lokked at this site since it had "stream" in the name. But after looking it appears as though it isn't a streaming video site, I guess I'll have to look into it more...
I came into some fine birthday money, so I joined there and ddf, probably could have spent it a little better now that I think about it, but ah well... doubt i will be spending that kind of money on a site again.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-attractive models
-decent video quality, I mostly downloaded the "middle" quality 704x396 1200 kbps avi, reasonably crisp. The HD video is 4000 kbps and decent, but I didn't download many of these given the file size.
-decent download speeds, better than 1MB/s most times I tried
-little to no cencorship, I didn't see any in the videos I downloaded
-no drm
-download managers sort of work
-customer service is friendly and helpful
-good sized site 1672 videos at time of review
Cons:
-quite expensive
-navigation is poor, typically you just have to look through every video offered
-ads on site, some of which are in japanese, so you have to be careful where you click
-movies can be long, although this is typical of japanese porn, most are more than 40 minutes
-join process is a nuisance, can't join with a web-based email service for some reason
-billing through their company, DTI
-there is supposedly a 6-gig limit, although I must never have hit it, as I never got cut off.
-not much in the way of photosets
Bottom Line:
This was a tough site for me to review, I found the model quality overall to be very good, however it is hard to say if it is worth the price. If the price were more in-line with other sites, I would probably score this place in the high 80s. I think if you are really into Japanese porn, but don't like the mosaic that is typically found, this site might be worth joining. If it is just an occasional fancy, I would probably look for something cheaper.
Like much of the Japanese porn I have seen, the scenes can be somewhat odd to a westerner, but personally I find them pretty hot for the most part. Toy use is frequent, and creampies are the most common ending, and lesbian content is pretty rare, unless you count group as lesbian (which they do).
To answer a comment from earlier, while some of the women are shaven, I found the ratio to be pretty typical of other sites in this niche I have joined, mostly hairy, some trimmed, few shaven.
Aside from dropping the price, it would be nice if they improved the navigation. Their are some dead links, some that lead to "movie removed" pages, and their index of material types I found to be pretty worthless. It would also be nice to have some more photos, for the most part they are just screen caps, and no zips are available.
Overall I think this is a decent site, that is too highly priced. The model quality and video quality are both good, and the lack of censorship is great. It might be a place to consider if this is one of your favorite niches. However, if not, I'd probably save the money and join jsex or something of the sort for half the price (even though most of their stuff is censored). Also, this is definitely not a place for fans of photos.
yeah, that's what I'll probably try, I got an email address with my ISP a long-ass time ago, I just have to figure out what it was and what the password is and I suppose it will work.
So I was thinking of finally taking the dive on this place, but the join process requires a non-web based email... Never seen this before, certainly don't want to be using my work email for porn.
This one actually seems particularly sneaky as they start with "I agree to the purchase of adult material" so one might not closely read the rest. Not a way to win over customers I would think...
It isn't a problem with the downloads, its that they list some content that isn't available to download. I know there are several Sophie Moone and Mia Stone scenes that are listed but when you click on them there is nothing available for download. I'm sure if you look around you will see what I am talking about.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
